Skip to main content
. 2005 Nov;43(11):5779–5781. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5779-5781.2005

TABLE 2.

Clusters of isolates based on identical MIRU and spoligotyping alleles

Family designationa Cluster no. VIT no. SIT no. No. of isolates % of clustered isolates
Central Europe 1 1 220 39 3 2
    LAM3 2 236 33 6 4
    LAM3 3 213 33 32 22
    LAM4 4 249 130 2 1
    LAM3 5 213 719 13 9
    LAM3 6 213 1294 2 1
    LAM3 7 213 2014 2 1
Russia 1 8 140 254 3 2
    S 9 212 34 3 2
    S 10 250 71 2 1
    S 11 252 71 2 1
    S 12 262 71 2 1
    T3 13 257 73 2 1
Tuscanyb 14 140 1737 2 1
W-Beijing 15 104 1 24 16
W-Beijing 16 223 1 5 3
W-Beijing 17 254 1 2 1
W-Beijing 18 83 1 3 2
W-Beijing 19 238 1 5 3
W-Beijing 20 17 1 9 6
W-Beijing 21 99 1 7 5
W-Beijing 22 245 1 2 1
    X1 23 112 119 5 3
    X1 24 117 119 2 1
    X1 25 258 2019 2 1
    X3 26 34 92 4 3
    Z 27 237 811 2 1
a

Family and VIT-SIT designations are from SpolDB4 (Brudley et al, unpublished).

b

Data are from reference 8.