Table 5.
Lowered odds of having incident neurocognitive disorder among tea drinkers as compared with non-tea drinkers: stratifed analyses based on gender and APOE ɛ4 status at baseline
| Subgroup | Subgroup N | Tea consumption N | NCD N (%) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | 367 | Yes No | 289 78 | 23 (8.0) 9 (11.5) | 0.91 (0.34 – 2.49) | |
| Women | 590 | Yes No | 371 219 | 16 (4.3) 24 (11) | 0.32 (0.15 – 0.69) | |
| APOE ɛ4 carriers | 177 | Yes No | 128 49 | 5 (3.9) 6 (12.2) | 0.14 (0.02 – 0.93) | |
| Non APOE ɛ4 carriers | 722 | Yes No | 494 228 | 31 (6.3) 24 (10.5) | 0.56 (0.30 – 1.04) | |
Odds Ratios and 95% confdence intervals of incident NCD for tea drinkers, calculated using multiple logistic regression; Variables that were adjusted for in the model are: age, gender, education, smoking, Alcohol consumption, BMI (continuous), Hypertension, Diabetes, Heart disease, Stroke, Depression (GDS ≥5), APOE ɛ4, Physical activities, social and productive activities, vegetables and fruits consumption, fsh consumption, coffee consumption; The two interaction terms were tested in the logistic regression model for the entire study sample, both interactions were not signifcant at alpha=0.05 level. P value for the interaction term tea-gender was 0.089; P value for the interaction term tea*APOE ɛ4 was 0.431.