Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 3;27(6):448–456. doi: 10.1007/s12603-023-1927-8

Table 3.

Cross-sectional associations between nut consumption and depression in the Seniors-ENRICA-I and Seniors-ENRICA-II studies

Cross-sectional analysis Seniors-ENRICA-I Seniors-ENRICA-II
Total n (prevalent cases of depression) Odds ratio (95% CI) Total n (prevalent cases of depression) Odds ratio (95% CI)
Total 2278 (233) 2726 (407)
Crude model
Nut consumption (servingsa per week)
0 to < 1 1568 (156) 1.00 1331 (226) 1.00
1 to < 3 247 (30) 1.27 (0.80, 2.03) 429 (60) 0.80 (0.58, 1.08)
≥ 3 463 (47) 1.03 (0.68, 1.55) 966 (121) 0.70 (0.55, 0.89)*
p-for-trend 0.832 0.014
Adjusted model 1
Nut consumption (servingsa per week)
0 to < 1 1568 (156) 1.00 1331 (226) 1.00
1 to < 3 247 (30) 1.27 (0.79, 2.04) 429 (60) 0.78 (0.57, 1.07)
≥ 3 463 (47) 1.06 (0.69, 1.61) 966 (121) 0.74 (0.58, 0.94)*
p-for-trend 0.951 0.062
Adjusted model 2
Nut consumption (servingsa per week)
0 to < 1 1568 (156) 1.00 1331 (226) 1.00
1 to < 3 247 (30) 1.33 (0.80, 2.20) 429 (60) 0.83 (0.60, 1.16)
≥ 3 463 (47) 1.33 (0.85, 2.08) 966 (121) 0.86 (0.66, 1.12)
p-for-trend 0.278 0.545

Model 1 adjusted for sex, age, educational level and living alone. Model 2 included the variables of Model 1 and smoking status, alcohol consumption, sleep duration, physical inactivity, body mass index, MEDAS score, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, cancer at any site, and neurodegenerative disease. a 1 serving = 30 g. * p <0.05.