Table 6.
Percentage (%) of Correct Identification of True Interval Location ata |
|||||||
20% Perturbation |
50% Perturbation |
||||||
Degree of Dominance (β) | NP | P1 | P2 | NP | P1 | P2 | |
0 | .5 | 95.1 | 98.3 | 98.9 | 94.8 | 98.1 | 98.6 |
2 | .9 | 91.2 | 81.7 | 83.2 | 88.0 | 81.3 | 84.0 |
4 | .7 | 73.6 | 48.5 | 50.6 | 71.7 | 46.4 | 48.8 |
Note.—Simulation parameter values were α=5, σ2=1, and θ1=θ2=θ3=θ4=θ5=.01, ρ=.7.
Definitions of abbreviations are the same as those given in table 1.