Skip to main content
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2026 Jan 30;1267:355–372. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1267.174100

Systematic position of the enigmatic Mirlatia arcuata moth resolved: a monotypic tribe within the basal branches of Larentiinae (Lepidoptera, Geometridae)

Pasi Sihvonen 1,✉, Kyung Min Lee 1, Balázs Tóth 2, Gergely Katona 2, Elina Laiho 1, Axel Hausmann 3
PMCID: PMC12881918  PMID: 41659380

Abstract

Recently, a new monotypic geometrid moth genus and species, Mirlatia arcuata Hausmann, László, Mayr & Huemer, 2023, were described from Croatia. The description was based on a single male collected in 1983, and a single female collected in 1982. The discovery of an isolated lineage in Europe was unexpected because the Geometridae fauna of the continent is likely the best explored in the world. Upon description, the systematic position of Mirlatia arcuata remained unresolved due to its peculiar morphology and lack of suitable molecular data to study its phylogenetic position. Based on a new specimen collected in 2024, we studied its phylogeny, including it in a maximum likelihood multi-gene global phylogenetic dataset of 1206 taxa, and comparative morphological analysis. Based on the results of our integrative approach, we propose to classify this enigmatic species in a monotypic tribe Mirlatiini Sihvonen & Hausmann, tribe nov. within the basal Larentiinae as the sister to Brabirodini. Other proposed taxonomic changes include reclassification of Brabira Moore, 1888 in Brabirodini and Tyloptera Christoph, 1881 in Larentiinae: incertae sedis. We illustrate closely related genera in Mirlatiini, Brabirodini and Dyspteridini, for taxonomic clarity.

Key words: Classification, Europe, integrative taxonomy, Mirlatiini , molecular, morphology, new tribe, phylogeny

Introduction

The European Lepidoptera fauna is likely the best explored in the world, and the family Geometridae is no exception, thanks to a systematic revision published in the Geometrid Moths of Europe monographic series (Hausmann 2001; Mironov 2003; Hausmann 2004; Hausmann and Viidalepp 2012; Skou and Sihvonen 2015; Müller et al. 2019). The fauna was concluded to contain 999 species (Hausmann and Sihvonen 2019), and after the publication of the systematic checklist, a few more species have been added to the fauna of Europe and adjacent areas (e.g., Hausmann 2020; Falck and Hausmann 2020; Rajaei et al. 2021; Guerrero et al. 2021; Scalercio et al. 2021; Beshkov 2022; Werner et al. 2023). Also, phylogenetic relationships of the fauna are relatively well established (e.g., Hausmann and Sihvonen 2019; Murillo-Ramos et al. 2019; Õunap et al. 2025).

Against this background, the discovery of a distinct unknown geometrid species from Croatia was unexpected (Hausmann et al. 2023). The description was based on a single male collected in 1983 and a single female collected in 1982. The formal description highlighted the isolation, as Mirlatia arcuata Hausmann, László, Mayr & Huemer, 2023 was described in a monotypic genus, and its systematic position remained unresolved due to its peculiar morphology and lack of suitable molecular data. Mirlatia arcuata was tentatively placed in the subfamily Larentiinae based on morphological characters, including the fusion of hindwing veins Sc+R1 and Rs, and a double forewing areole supporting this. The structure of the tympanal organs, which is often diagnostic at the subfamily level, is unique: the very broad base and the lack of apical dilation of the tympanal ansa are different from any other geometrid moth. A broad ansa base is found in Archiearinae, Desmobathrinae and Ennominae: Alsophilini, but these groups have an ansa with a pointed tip (Hausmann 2001), while it is truncate in Mirlatia. The peculiar structures also include long bipectination in the female antennae.

A fresh male specimen of Mirlatia arcuata was found in Croatia on 14 March 2024 by Róbert Enyedi, Gergely Katona, Tamás Korompai and Balázs Tóth (Tóth et al. 2025), and again on 9 March 2025 (Fig. 1). We used tissue from the specimen collected on 14 March 2024 to analyse both mitochondrial and nuclear genes in a molecular phylogenetic dataset, which includes representatives from all continents except Antarctica; it covers all known geometrid subfamilies and the majority of tribes. We present the results of this work in this paper, in addition to the morphological examination of selected structures of M. arcuata and species most closely related to it as indicated by the molecular data and literature (see below), and propose a revised classification for M. arcuata in the Geometridae tree of life.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A. Voucher specimen of Mirlatia arcuataHausmann et al. 2023 used in the molecular study; B. Mirlatia arcuata and Coenotephria ablutaria (Boisduval, 1840) specimens on rock, showing the strikingly cryptic coloration of both species (Croatia: Dalmatia, Drvenik, 43.1713°N, 17.2355°E, 9.3.2025). Photo 1A by Balázs Tóth, 1B by Gergely Katona.

Material and methods

Abbreviations

HNHM Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary

NHMV The Natural History Museum, Vienna, Austria

NHMUK The Natural History Museum, London, UK

TLMF Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeum, Innsbruck, Austria

ZSM SNSB - Bavarian State Collection of Zoology (Zoologische Staatssammlung München), Munich, Germany.

Label data of examined specimens are presented verbatim as they appear on the labels, a forward slash denoting separate lines and a double forward slash separating labels, and additional information about specimens or labels is enclosed in square brackets.

Molecular analyses

Genomic DNA was extracted from a leg of the specimen collected in 2024. The procedure for DNA extraction, purification, amplification, cleaning and sequencing of both mitochondrial (COI) and protein-coding nuclear gene regions (ArgK, Wingless, RpS5, Ca-ATPase, Nex9, and EF-1alpha) (Table 1) followed the protocols described by Sihvonen et al. (2020) and Lee et al. (2024). All molecular work was conducted at the DNA laboratory of the Finnish Museum of Natural History. PCR products were sequenced at the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland – FIMM (Helsinki, Finland). Sequence alignment, cleaning, model selection, tree search strategies using maximum likelihood (ML), node support estimation, and tree visualization also followed the aforementioned protocols.

Table 1.

GenBank accession numbers for the new sequences used in this study.

Voucher COI RpS5 Wgl EF-1alpha Ca-ATPase Nex9 ArgK
PMS10002A PX412926 PX434320 PX434321 PX434318 PX434316 PX434319 PX434317

Molecular data for Mirlatia arcuata were analysed using a maximum likelihood approach implemented in IQ-TREE (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016), using the 1206-taxon dataset compiled by Murillo-Ramos et al. (2019). The best-fitting substitution models were selected by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017), with each partition assigned its own evolutionary rate. The resulting phylogenetic tree was rooted using representative species of the families Sematuridae, Epicopeiidae, Pseudobistonidae and Uraniidae. The tree was visualized and rooted in FigTree (ver. 1.4.3, Rambaut 2015) and edited for presentation in CorelDRAW (ver. 24).

Examined material and its systematic position prior to our analyses

Following the molecular analysis (Fig. 2), we examined the morphology of Brabirodes near peruviana Warren, 1904, which was recovered as the sister to Mirlatia arcuata. We also examined the morphology of Brabira Moore, 1888 and Tyloptera Christoph, 1881, which are assumed to be closely related based on the literature (Scoble 1999: Appendix; Viidalepp 2011; Beljaev 2016), and species of Dyspteridini based on literature (Hausmann and Viidalepp 2012; Hall et al. 2025). Metadata for the examined specimens, illustrated in this paper, are listed below.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A. Phylogenetic position of Mirlatia arcuataHausmann et al. 2023 and the monotypic Mirlatiini within the basal Larentiinae in the 1206 taxa dataset of Murillo-Ramos et al. (2019) covering Geometroidea on global scale. Only relevant branches are shown, the full tree is provided in Supplementary Material 1. The phylogenetic hypothesis is based on maximum likelihood approach of up to 11 mitochondrial and nuclear genes. Numbers above branches indicate ultrafast bootstrap support; B. Brabirodes sp. (Costa Rica: San José, 15.3.2025, photo by Jason Hafstad, used under CC-BY-NC license from iNaturalist) CMirlatia arcuata (Croatia: Drvenik, 43.1713°N, 17.2355°E, 8.3.2025, photo by Balázs Tóth).

Mirlatia arcuata Hausmann et al., 2023

Systematic position unclear, tentatively Larentiinae (Hausmann et al. 2023). Holotype male (DNA barcode and morphology examined): Podgora – Drvenik / YU [southern Croatia, 25 km SE Makarska] [leg. Robert] Hentscholek / [handwritten] 18.3.1983” // DNA barcode sample ID BC_ZSM_Lep_115293 // gen. prp. [genitalia preparation] Hausm. [Hausmann] G 22091 // coll. TLMF. Male (multi-gene and morphology examined): Croatia, Dalmatia, Drvenik, southern slope // ca. 360 m // light trap // 43.1713°N, 17.2355°E // 14.iii.2024 // leg. Róbert Enyedi, Gergely Katona, Tamás Korompai & Balázs Tóth; id. No HNHM-LEP-12110 // coll. HNHM. Paratype female (morphology examined): Podgora – Drvenik / YU [southern Croatia, 25 km SE Makarska] [leg. Robert] Hentscholek / [handwritten] 27.3.1982” // [gen. prp. nr. László] 3352 ♀ // coll. NHMV.

DNA barcodes available to us on BOLD https://boldsystems.org/ with the following voucher codes were examined: BC ZSM Lep 115293 (Croatia, 19.3.1983, holotype), and BC ZSM Lep 120137 (Croatia, 10.3.2024).

Brabirodes near peruviana Warren, 1904

Systematic position earlier Cidariini (Viidalepp 2011, based on Brabirodes cerevia (Druce, 1893)), now Brabirodini (Brehm et al. 2019). Male (morphology examined): ECUADOR/ Route Baeza – Lumbaqui / au Puente Axuela / 1530 m - 6 et 7.ii.1975 / C. Herbulot // Brabirodes / cerevia Druce / ssp. Peruviana / Warr.// Pasi Sihvonen / prep. number 2974 // coll. ZSM. Female (morphology examined): BOLIVIE Nor. Yungas / Rte. Mururata-Sta. Rosa / Rio Suapi 1200m / 1-[19]84 Lachause Porion // Pasi Sihvonen / prep. number 2975 // coll. ZSM.

DNA barcodes available to us on BOLD https://boldsystems.org/ with the following voucher codes were examined: ID 19269 (Ecuador, 5.2.2013), and MK739303 (=gb ID 19269, Ecuador, 5.2.2013).

Note: Brabirodes Warren, 1904 includes three taxa (Scoble 1999, Rajaei et al. 2022), which were originally validated as species (Druce 1893a, Druce 1893b, Warren 1904). In the recent literature (Rajaei et al. 2022), only two species are considered valid because taxon peruviana Warren, 1904 (type locality in Peru) is considered a subspecies of ceravia Druce, 1893 (type locality in Mexico). We have examined the type specimens of these three similar taxa in coll. NHMUK externally, but the type specimens are not dissected or DNA barcoded, and therefore, we cannot confirm the exact identity of our study specimens. Further, Viidalepp (2011) illustrated the male genitalia of Brabirodes cerevia from Nicaragua (type species of the genus), which he classified in Cidariini. Cidariini and Brabirodini are not closely related (Brehm et al. 2019), and the structures illustrated by Viidalepp (2011) are notably different from the Ecuadorian material we examined. Because the species-level taxonomy of genus Brabirodes is unclear, we named our study specimens as “Brabirodes near peruviana”.

Brabira atkinsoni Moore, 1888

Systematic position Dyspteridini (Beljaev 2016). Male (morphology examined): NEPAL / 18 Km SSE Katmandu / Route du Phulchoki / 2100 m, 1.X.1983 / C. Herbulot // Pasi Sihvonen / prep. number 2976 // coll. ZSM. Female (morphology examined): Nepal / Prov. Nr. 1 East / Pultschuk 23.–2500m / 12.VI.1967 leg. / Dierl-Forster-Schacht / Staatsslg. München // Pasi Sihvonen / prep. number 2977 // coll. ZSM.

DNA barcodes available to us on BOLD https://boldsystems.org/ with the following voucher codes were examined: BC ZSM Lep 29780 (China: Sichuan, 17.7.2009), BC ZSM Lep 29989 (China: Sichuan, 13.7.2009), BC ZSM Lep 29992 (China: Sichuan, 13.7.2009), Brabira AH01Ch (China: Sichuan, 13.7.2009), BC ZSM Lep 38274 (Bhutan, 25.10.2009), BC ZSM Lep 68687 (Nepal, 15.7.1995). These belong to three different BINs: BOLD:AAJ8062, BOLD:AAP1598, BOLD:ACL9748.

Tyloptera bella (Butler, 1878)

Systematic position Dyspteridini (Viidalepp 2016). Male (morphology examined): Russia S.B. / Vladivostok dist. 20 / Nachodka / 07.[19]94. / leg. Kuznezov // Pasi Sihvonen / prep. number 2978 // coll. ZSM. Female (morphology examined): [RUSSIA] Vladivostok / Siberie Or. / 2-VIII-1925 // Pasi Sihvonen / prep. number 2979 // coll. ZSM.

DNA barcodes available to us on BOLD https://boldsystems.org/ with the following voucher codes were examined: AYK-04-1013-13 (Japan, 1.8.2004), AYK-06-7336 (Japan, 26.8.2006), 09-JDWGEO-095 (Japan, 26.8.2006), BC ZSM Lep 29687 (China: Sichuan, 12.7.2009), BC ZSM Lep 29945 (China: Sichuan, 12.7.2009), BC ZSM Lep 68691 (Russia: Vladivostok, 31.7.1994). These belong to two different BINs: BOLD:AAF0396, BOLD:AAI9155.

Morphological analyses

Adult specimens, genitalia, and abdomens were prepared and photographed following methods summarized in Sihvonen et al. (2020). Uneverted vesica and tympanal organs were photographed in situ during dissection to allow an optimal angle for observation and illustration.

One pair of wings was removed from the dry specimen and submerged in 99% ethanol for a few seconds, and then submerged in 2.7% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution for a few minutes for bleaching. Following this, the wings were submerged in 99% ethanol to remove NaClO and to physically remove the remaining scales with delicate brushes. The wing slides were left unstained and mounted in Euparal.

Photographs were edited in Adobe Photoshop (ver. CS6), and figure plates were compiled in CorelDRAW (ver. 24).

Results

Biology

Specimens caught in 2024 and 2025 were attracted to portable UV light tubes, placed in forest patches with Ostrya carpinifoloa Scop. and herbaceous vegetation with Erica spp. right at the edge of a scree at about 360 meters. Potential habitats of M. arcuata include steep slopes, cliffs and screes. The collecting locality and vegetation are described in more detail in Tóth et al. (2025). The co-occurring moth fauna included overwintering species, typical of late winter and early and mid-spring.

Mirlatia arcuata has a planiform resting position, i.e., the wings are parallel to the ground, and it camouflages itself against the rocks (Figs 1, 2).

Phylogenetic analysis

Inclusion of Mirlatia arcuata in a global, multi-gene molecular analysis of Geometroidea dataset of 1206 terminal taxa placed the species within the basal Larentiinae, as sister to Brabirodini (ultrafast bootstrap support = 88) (Fig. 2). Genera Brabirodes + Mirlatia were recovered as sister to Dyspteridini (ultrafast bootstrap support = 87). The full phylogeny is provided in Suppl. material 1.

Morphology

Comparative morphological analysis revealed the uniqueness of Mirlatia arcuata (Figs 7–10, 11–14, 15–18). When compared to Brabirodes near peruviana, Brabira atkinsoni and Tyloptera bella, or more widely to Dyspteridini (Viidalepp 2011; Hausmann and Viidalepp 2012; Hall et al. 2025), autapomorphic characters in the male genitalia include a bilobed uncus, densely spinose juxta and a bundle of cornuti. In the female genitalia, the diagnostic characters (when compared to other basal Larentiinae) include anterior apophyses, which are interconnected by a narrow, strongly sclerotized, evenly-arched band, and a corpus bursae with a striated posterior part. Further, the apex of the ansa in the tympanal organ is not expanded laterally.

Figures 7–10.

Figures 7–10.

Male genitalia (not to scale) of the examined species, with specimen metadata below. 7. Mirlatia arcuata. 7a. Genitalia; 7b. Aedeagus; 7c. Еnlarged juxta. Holotype, Croatia: Podgora - Drvenik, 18.3.1983 (coll. TLMF, dissection Hausmann G 22091). 8. Brabirodes near peruviana. 8a. Genitalia; 8b. Aedeagus; 8c. Vesica; 8d. Enlarged spinose structure. Ecuador: Puente Azuela, 6–7.2.1975 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2974). 9. Brabira atkinsoni. 9a. Genitalia; 9b. Aedeagus; 9c. Vesica; 9d. Enlarged juxta and socii. Nepal: 18 km SSE Kathmandu, 2100 m, 1.10.1983 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2976). 10. Tyloptera bella. 10a. Genitalia; 10b. Aedeagus; 10c. Vesica; 10d. Enlarged socii. Russia: Vladivostok, Nakhodka, July 1994 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2978).

The examined basal Larentiinae taxa share characters, which are potential synapomorphies waiting to be tested in an analytical context: forewing with two areoles (Mirlatia + Brabirodes + Brabira) and the narrow sclerotized, evenly-arched band between anterior apophyses (Mirlatia + Brabirodes).

Brabirodes and Brabira are the most similar among the examined taxa, sharing, for instance, greenish wings, reduced hindwings with crenulate margins, an anal margin of the hindwing with a lobe, reduced venation on the hindwing, two forewing areoles and long labial palps. Further structural similarities include, for instance, in the male genitalia a large vesica, in which the ductus ejaculatorius opens laterally near the base and is basally narrow and restricted (Figs 8, 9).

Tyloptera bella is morphologically different from the other examined genera: the forewing has only one areole, the hindwing has three M veins, the gnathos arms are fused, the ductus ejaculatorius does not open laterally, the apex of the ansa is expanded laterally and “frilled” (margins are not smooth), and the margin of the membrane in the tympanal organ is crown-shaped (Figs 10, 14, 18).

Figures 11–14.

Figures 11–14.

Female genitalia (not to scale) of the examined species, with specimen metadata below. 11. Mirlatia arcuata. 11a. Genitalia; 11b. Ostium bursae and adjacent structures. Croatia: Pogdora - Drvenik, 27.3.1982 (coll. NHMV, dissection László 3352). 12. Brabirodes near peruviana. 12a. Genitalia; 12b. Ostium bursae and adjacent structures. Bolivia: Rio Suapi, 1200 m, January 1984 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2975). 13. Brabira atkinsoni. 13a. Genitalia; 13b. Ostium bursae and adjacent structures. Nepal: East Pultschuk, 2500 m, 12.6.1967 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2977). 14. Tyloptera bella. 14a. Genitalia; 14b. Ostium bursae and adjacent structures. Russia: Vladivostok, 2.8.1925 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2979).

Figures 15–18.

Figures 15–18.

Tympanal organs (not to scale) of the examined species, with specimen metadata below. 15. Mirlatia arcuata, female. Croatia: Pogdora - Drvenik, 27.3.1982 (coll. NHMV, dissection László 3352). 16. Brabirodes near peruviana, female. Bolivia: Rio Suapi, 1200 m, January 1984 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2975). 17. Brabira atkinsoni, female. Nepal: East Pultschuk, 2500 m, 12.6.1967 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2977). 18. Tyloptera bella, female. Russia: Vladivostok, 2.8.1925 (coll. ZSM, dissection Sihvonen PMS2979).

Classification

Integrative data based on molecules and morphology (Figs 2, 3–6, 7–10, 11–14, 15–18, 19–20, 21–22) support the view that Mirlatia is a monotypic tribe, morphologically distinct from the sister lineage Brabirodini: Brabirodes + Brabira. We classify Mirlatia here in a monotypic tribe Mirlatiini Sihvonen & Hausmann, tribe nov. (Table 2). Among the European Geometridae, we place Mirlatiini: Mirlatia arcuata in the linear list of taxa (Hausmann and Sihvonen 2019; the phylogenetic relationships are refined in Õunap et al. (2025) before Celonoptera mirificaria Lederer, 1862, which is currently classified in Dyspteridini (Õunap et al. 2025).

Table 2.

Summary of formally proposed taxonomic changes and diagnostic morphological characters of the basal Larentiinae. Taxonomic changes are arranged alphabetically in “Explanation” column. Diagnostic morphological characters are based on the literature and on the present study. Most of the listed characters are unambiguous at the tribe level and show exceptions, but when considered together, they allow delimitation of tribes as monophyletic groups. The classification of all listed genera in the tribes has not been tested analytically; therefore it is tentative. Species diversity derived from Rajaei et al. (2022); biogeographic realms after Olson et al. (2001).

Explanation Taxonomic change
Brabira Moore, 1888 is transferred from Dyspteridini (Beljaev 2016) to Brabirodini. reclassification to Mirlatiini tribe nov.
We propose Mirlatiini Sihvonen & Hausmann as a valid tribe, based on Mirlatia arcuataHausmann et al. 2023. The diagnostic characters of Mirlatia also apply at the tribe level (Hausmann et al. 2023). tribe nov.
Tyloptera Christoph, 1881 is transferred from Dyspteridini (Beljaev 2016) to Larentiinae: incertae sedis. Tribe classification awaits further studies. tribe combination incertae sedis.
Tribe Diagnostic (synapomorphic) characters Diversity and distribution
Mirlatiini Uncus dilated, spoon-shaped; apex of ansa not dilated; juxta rugose, spinulose; vesica with group of cornuti; base of abdomen not specialized; hindwing margin crenulate; forewing with two areoles; female antennae bipectinate; papillae anales connected by strongly sclerotized ridge (Hausmann et al. 2023, present study). 1 genus, 1 species: Mirlatia arcuata. West Palearctic (Europe)
Brabirodini Wings dominantly greenish; hindwings reduced; hindwing margin crenulate; forewing with two areoles; apex of ansa dilated, wide; juxta membranous; cornuti absent; ductus ejaculatorius opens laterally; base of abdomen not specialized; female antennae filiform (present study). 2 genera, 12 species: Brabirodes 3, Brabira, 9. Neotropical, Indo-Malay, East Palearctic
Dyspteridini Base of abdomen with long, setose apodeme; hollow sac on A2 absent; wings dominantly green; hindwing margin smooth; vesica with bundle of small cornuti (Viidalepp 2011). Apex of ansa dilated, wide; hindwings reduced; forewings with two areoles; female antennae filiform (present study). 5 genera, 40 species: Heterophleps 36, Celonoptera 1, Paradetis 1, Chlorotimandra 1, Dyspteris 1. Indo-Malay, Nearctic, Palearctic, Australasia, Neotropical

Figures 19, 20.

Figures 19, 20.

Wing venations (not to scale) of the examined species, with specimen metadata below. 19. Mirlatia arcuata, holotype male. Croatia: Podgora-Drvenik, 18.3.1983 (coll. TLMF, gen. prep. Hausm. G 22091). 20. Brabirodes near peruviana, male. Ecuador: Puente Azuela, 6–7.2.1975 (coll. ZSM, dissection PMS2980).

Figures 21, 22.

Figures 21, 22.

Wing venations (not to scale) of the examined species, with specimen metadata below. 21. Brabira atkinsoni, male. Nepal: 18 kkm SSE Kathmandu, 1.10.1983 (coll. ZSM, dissection PMS2981). 22. Tyloptera bella, male. Russia: Vladivostok, July 1994 (coll. ZSM, dissection PMS2982).

Brabira has recently been classified in Trichopterygini (Holloway 1997, Viidalepp 2011) or in Dyspteridini (Beljaev 2016). Here we demonstrate that at least the type species of Brabira (B. atkinsoni Moore, 1888) is morphologically similar to the type species of Brabirodini: Brabirodes (B. peruviana Warren, 1904). The similarity concerns external characters such as elongated labial palps, wing color and pattern and shape, and wing venation. In the male genitalia, these two genera share, for instance, the vesica shape with a laterally opening ductus ejaculatorius (Figs 4, 5, 8, 9, Table 2). The close connection of these genera was noted already by Warren (1904). Holloway (1997) illustrates Brabira emerita Prout, 1926 from Borneo, in which the corpus bursae of the female genitalia is similarly striated to that of Mirlatia arcuata. We transfer Brabira Moore, 1888 to Brabirodini new classification.

Figures 3–6.

Figures 3–6.

Adults of the examined species, with specimen metadata below. 3a. Mirlatia arcuata ♂ (holotype), Croatia: Podgora - Drvenik, 18.3.1983 (coll. TLMF). Barcoded (BC_ZSM_Lep_15293), dissected (Hausmann G 22091); 3b. M. arcuata ♀ (paratype), Croatia: Pogdora - Drvenik, 27.3.1982 (coll. NHMV). Dissected (László 3352). 4a. Brabirodes near peruviana ♂, Ecuador: Puente Azuela, 6–7.2.1975 (coll. ZSM). Dissected (Sihvonen PMS2974); 4b. B. near peruviana ♀, Bolivia: Rio Suapi, 1200 m, January 1984 (coll. ZSM). Dissected (Sihvonen PMS2975). 5a. Brabira atkinsoni ♂, Nepal: 18 km SSE Kathmandu, 2100 m, 1.10.1983 (coll. ZSM). Dissected (Sihvonen PMS2976); 5b. B. atkinsoni ♀, Nepal: East Pultschuk, 2500 m, 12.6.1967 (coll. ZSM). Dissected (Sihvonen PMS2977). 6a. Tyloptera bella ♂, Russia: Vladivostok, Nakhodka, July 1994 (coll. ZSM). Dissected (Sihvonen PMS2978); 6b. T. bella ♀, Russia: Vladivostok, 2.8.1925 (coll. ZSM). Dissected (Sihvonen PMS2979).

Based on the morphological data, we note that Tyloptera bella, which has been classified earlier in Trichopterygini (Viidalepp 2011) and Dyspteridini (Beljaev 2016), does not have diagnostic characters of either of these tribes, nor Brabirodini or Mirlatiini (Table 2). The tympanal organ is unique, having a membrane with a spiked margin, and the apex of the ansa is membrane-like, frilled, and wide. The authors have not seen such a spiked margin (crown-shaped) elsewhere in Geometridae. Tyloptera bella also has one areole on the forewing (other examined Larentiinae have two), the inner margin of the hindwing is without a lobe, it has a well-developed uncus, paired socii, and fused gnathos arms. The closest non-congeneric DNA barcode matches are Afroracotis lydiae László et al. 2023 (Ennominae: Boarmiini, 5.56%; due to long-branch attraction) and the closest Larentiinae is Heterophleps triguttaria Herrich-Schäffer, 1854 (Dyspteridini, 6.38%). Tyloptera bella has not yet been included in a multi-gene molecular phylogeny. We classify it as Larentiinae: incertae sedis, noting that further research is needed to clarify its systematic position.

Discussion

In this paper, we examined the phylogeny of the monotypic Mirlatia arcuata from Croatia and provided evidence that it belongs to the basal evolutionary lineage within the subfamily Larentiinae. In general, understanding phylogeny is significant because it depicts the evolutionary relationships between organisms, thereby providing a framework for understanding how life has diversified. This knowledge can be used, for instance, to study the evolutionary history of species and the evolution of traits over time, and it can be applied, for instance, in nature conservation by identifying isolated lineages. Mirlatia arcuata is a case in point: it is a phylogenetically isolated evolutionary lineage and therefore of potential conservation value, which we highlight as a priority for further research. Its biology, habitat and life history need to be investigated; the host plant of the caterpillar needs to be identified; its phenology must be understood; and its distribution needs to be mapped. These are prerequisites for making knowledge-based decisions about its conservation.

Our study also demonstrates that an integrative approach is needed to understand how an isolated lineage in the phylogenetic tree should be classified. If the molecular phylogenetic hypothesis is used alone, we cannot infer from the tree whether Mirlatia arcuata and its sister lineage should be classified as a single taxonomic entity. Morphology shows clearly that the sister lineages are structurally different, and therefore it is logical to classify them in different taxonomic entities, in this case different tribes.

The basal Larentiinae have interesting biogeographic patterns. In the molecular analysis, the West-Palearctic Mirlatia arcuata was recovered as sister to the Neotropical Brabirodes near peruviana. Our morphological analysis, however, shows that Brabirodes is closely related to the East Palearctic Brabira; therefore, M. arcuata has connections to both the East Palearctic and Neotropical faunas. The connection between Palearctic and Neotropical biogeographical realms is rare in geometrid moths, but a somewhat similar cross-Atlantic connection was identified recently for a geometrid moth in the Canary Islands (Sihvonen et al. 2025) and earlier for the predominantly Palaearctic genus Rhodostrophia with three, clearly congeneric species in Chile (Trusch and Hausmann 2007). We note that the current taxon sampling in our multi-gene molecular phylogeny remains limited, and the addition of new taxa could potentially change the relationships.

Finally, we note that the socii are present in all examined species (Figs 7–10, including enlarged photos) and the gnathos is present in Tyloptera bella (Fig. 10). Traditionally, Larentiinae have been considered to lack a gnathos (Agnathoi group sensu Pierce 1914), and this view has been repeated in recent literature (see Schmidt 2015 for review and references). Similarly, many publications have assumed that the socii are generally lacking in Larentiinae (Schmidt 2017). Our results support the views of Schmidt (2015, 2017) that both structures are widely present in Larentiinae. Maybe the socii have been overlooked previously because of their small size, but the presence of small and setose lobes at the base of the uncus are diagnostic (Figs 9d, 10d).

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Toni Mayr, Peter Huemer and Gyula László who were the first to realize that the specimens of Mirlatia arcuata were of particular interest. We thank CSC-IT Center for Science Ltd., Espoo, Finland, for the allocation of computational resources. Sequencing was performed at the Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) Genomics unit, supported by HiLIFE and Biocenter Finland. We also thank our friends Róbert Enyedi and Tamás Korompai for their invaluable assistance in the fieldwork and for their help in the rediscovery of the species. We thank the reviewers (one anonymous and Dominic Wanke) and the editor Gunnar Brehm for constructive comments, which clarified and improved the content of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

Pasi Sihvonen acknowledges funding from the Research Council of Finland (decision number 331995), which supported the molecular work of the study.

Additional information

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Ethical statement

No ethical statement was reported.

Use of AI

No use of AI was reported.

Funding

Pasi Sihvonen acknowledges funding from the Research Council of Finland (decision number 331995), which supported the molecular work of the study.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: AH, PS. Data curation: PS, BT, EL, GK, AH, KML. Formal analysis: KML, PS. Funding acquisition: PS. Investigation: PS, GK, BT, AH, KML. Methodology: EL, PS, KML. Project administration: PS, KML, AH. Resources: PS, AH, GK, BT. Software: KML. Validation: PS, AH. Visualization: PS. Writing– original draft: PS. Writing – review and editing: GK, EL, KML, BT.

Author ORCIDs

Pasi Sihvonen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2237-9325

Kyung Min Lee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-1073

Balázs Tóth https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6089-1218

Gergely Katona https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3161-8060

Elina Laiho https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6497-4178

Axel Hausmann https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0358-9928

Data availability

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1

Molecular maximum likelihood phylogenetic hypothesis, including Mirlatia arcuata (highlighted in orange), inference by gene, full tree of 1206 terminal taxa

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Pasi Sihvonen, Kyung Min Lee, Balázs Tóth, Gergely Katona, Elina Laiho, Axel Hausmann

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

The analysis includes up to seven genes per terminal taxa. Numbers under the branches are support values SH-aLRT support (%) / ultrafast bootstrap support (%) from IQTREE2. A small part of the tree is shown in Fig. 2.

References

  1. Beljaev E (2016): Annotated catalogue of the insects of Russian Far East. Volume II. Lepidoptera. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 812 p. https://ru.scribd.com/document/425671079/Annotated-catalogue-of-the-insects-of-Russian-Far-East-Volume-II-~~~PROTECTED_TN_198~~~-Vladivostok-Dalnauka-2016-812-p-ISBN-978-5-8044-1576-2
  2. Beshkov SV (2022) Dyscia intermedia sp. n. – a new Geometrid species from Europe (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Ennominae). Ecologica Montenegrina 53: 56–72. 10.37828/em.2022.53.7 [DOI]
  3. Brehm G, Murillo-Ramos L, Sihvonen P, Hausmann A, Schmidt BC, Õunap E, Moser A, Mörtter R, Bolt D, Bodner F, Lindt A, Parra LE, Wahlberg N (2019) New World geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): molecular phylogeny, biogeography, taxonomic updates and description of 11 new tribes. Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 77(3): 457–486. 10.26049/ASP77-3-2019-5 [DOI]
  4. Druce H (1893a) Biologia Centrali-America (Zoology), Insecta, Lepidoptera-Heterocera 2 (text). 622 p. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/14625#page/3/mode/1up
  5. Druce H (1893b) Biologia Centrali-America (Zoology), Insecta, Lepidoptera-Heterocera 3 (plates), 101 p. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/14626#page/103/mode/1up
  6. Falck P, Hausmann A (2020) Scopula villumi Falck & Hausmann, sp. n. from Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Sterrhinae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología 48(191): 507–511. 10.57065/shilap.359 [DOI]
  7. Guerrero J-J, Hausmann A, Ortiz AS (2021) Description of Idaea josephinae sp. n. from the Iberian Peninsula (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zootaxa 4990(2): 369–377. 10.11646/zootaxa.4990.2.10 [DOI] [PubMed]
  8. Hall SP, Sullivan JB, Petranka JW, Feldman T, George D, Niznik J, Backstrom P, Howard T (2025) The Moths of North Carolina. North Carolina Biodiversity Project and North Carolina State. https://auth1.dpr.ncparks.gov/moths/index.php
  9. Hausmann A (2001) Introduction. Archiearinae, Orthostixinae, Desmobathrinae, Alsophilinae, Geometrinae. In Hausmann A (Ed.) The Geometrid Moths of Europe 1: 1–282. Apollo Books, Stenstrup. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3423-2_1 [DOI]
  10. Hausmann A (2004) Sterrhinae. In Hausmann A (Ed.) The Geometrid Moths of Europe 2: 1–600. Apollo Books, Stenstrup. https://brill.com/display/title/23989
  11. Hausmann A (2020) Revision of the West Palaearctic Idaea nocturna species group (Lepidoptera, Geometridae, Sterrhinae). Mitteilungen der Munchner Entomologischen Gesellschaft. Munchner Entomologische Gesellschaft 110: 71–80.
  12. Hausmann A, Sihvonen P [Eds] (2019) Revised, annotated systematic checklist of the Geometridae of Europe and adjacent areas (Vols 1–6, pp. 795–871). In: Müller B, Erlacher S, Hausmann A, Rajaei, Sihvonen P, Skou P. Ennominae II. [Eds: Hausmann P, Sihvonen H, Rajaei P, Skou P], Geometrid Moths of Europe (Vol. 6). Brill. 10.1163/9789004387485_016 [DOI]
  13. Hausmann A, Viidalepp J (2012) Larentiinae I. In Hausmann A (Ed.) The Geometrid Moths of Europe 3: 1–743. Apollo Books, Vester Skerninge. https://brill.com/display/title/23990
  14. Hausmann A, László GM, Mayr T, Huemer P (2023) Surprising discovery of an enigmatic geometrid in Croatia: Mirlatia arcuata, gen. nov., sp. nov. (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). ZooKeys 1183: 99–110. 10.3897/zookeys.1183.110163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  15. Holloway JD (1997) The Moths of Borneo. Part 10: Family Geometridae, subfamilies Sterrhinae and Larentiinae. Malayan Nature Journal 51: 1–242. https://www.mothsofborneo.com/vol_10.php
  16. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14(6): 587–589. 10.1038/nmeth.4285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  17. Lee KM, Murillo-Ramos L, Huemer P, Hausmann A, Staude HS, Mayr T, Sihvonen P (2024) Complex evolution in thin air: Investigating female flightlessness and diel behaviour in geometrid moths (Lepidoptera). Systematic Entomology 2024(4): 1–14. 10.1111/syen.12633 [DOI]
  18. Mironov V (2003) Larentinae II. In: Hausmann A (Ed.) The Geometrid Moths of Europe 4: 1–464. Apollo Books, Stenstrup. https://brill.com/display/title/23991
  19. Müller B, Erlacher S, Hausmann A, Rajaei H, Sihvonen P, Skou P (2019) Ennominae II. In: Hausmann A, Sihvonen P, Rajaei H, Skou P (Eds) Geometrid Moths of Europe, vol. 6. Brill, Leiden, 906 pp. 10.1163/9789004387485 [DOI]
  20. Murillo-Ramos L, Brehm G, Sihvonen P, Hausmann A, Holm S, Ghanavi HR, Õunap E, Truuverk A, Staude H, Friedrich E, Tammaru T, Wahlberg N (2019) A comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Geometridae (Lepidoptera) with a focus on enigmatic small subfamilies. PeerJ 7: e7386. 10.7717/peerj.7386 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  21. Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN, Underwood EC, D’amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ, Allnutt TF, Ricketts TH, Kura Y, Lamoreux JF, Wettengel WW, Hedao P, Kassem KR (2001) Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth. Bioscience 51(11): 933–938. 10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2 [DOI]
  22. Õunap E, Nedumpally V, Yapar E, Lemmon AR, Tammaru T (2025) Molecular phylogeny of north European Geometridae (Lepidoptera: Geometroidea). Systematic Entomology 50(1): 32–67. 10.1111/syen.12638 [DOI]
  23. Pierce FN (1914) The Genitalia of the Group Geometridae of the Lepidoptera of the British Islands. F.N. Pierce, The Elms, Dingle, Liverpool, 230 pp.
  24. Rajaei H, Gelbrecht J, Schulz N, Hausmann A (2021) Minoa lutea Schwingenschuss, 1954 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae: Larentiinae) recognized as bona species. Zootaxa 4903(2): 255–264. 10.11646/zootaxa.4903.2.5 [DOI] [PubMed]
  25. Rajaei H, Hausmann A, Scoble M, Wanke D, Plotkin D, Brehm G, Murillo-Ramos L, Sihvonen P (2022) An online taxonomic facility of Geometridae (Lepidoptera), with an overview of global species richness and systematics. Integrative Systematics: Stuttgart Contributions to Natural History 5(2): 145–192. 10.18476/2022.577933 [DOI]
  26. Rambaut A (2015) FigTree, v1. 4.2: tree figure drawing tool. Molecular evolution, phylogenetics and epidemiology. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
  27. Scalercio S, Infusino M, Huemer P, Mutanen M (2021) Pruning the Barcode Index Numbers tree: Morphological and genetic evidence clarifies species boundaries in the Eupithecia conterminata complex (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in Europe. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 2021(8): 1–20. 10.1111/jzs.12568 [DOI]
  28. Schmidt O (2015) One century after: a reappraisal of the gnathos (sensu Pierce, 1914) in Larentiinae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zootaxa 3974(3): 328–340. 10.11646/zootaxa.3974.3.2 [DOI] [PubMed]
  29. Schmidt O (2017) Myths and facts about the absence of socii in the male genitalia of Larentiinae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zootaxa 4286(2): 254–266. 10.11646/zootaxa.4286.2.8 [DOI]
  30. Scoble MJ (Ed.) (1999) Geometrid Moths of the World: A Catalogue (Lepidoptera, Geometridae), Collingwood, Victoria, Australia (CSIRO Publishing), 1200 pp. 10.1071/9780643101050 [DOI]
  31. Sihvonen P, Murillo-Ramos L, Brehm G, Staude H, Wahlberg N (2020) Molecular phylogeny of Sterrhinae moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae): towards a global classification. Systematic Entomology 45(3): 606–634. 10.1111/syen.12418 [DOI]
  32. Sihvonen P, Skou P, Falck P, Murillo-Ramos L, Laiho E, Söderholm M, Staude HS, Englund M (2025) A phylogenetically isolated and endemic Geometridae discovered from montane forests in the Canary Island of Tenerife (Spain) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae, Larentiinae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología 53(210): 295–314. 10.57065/shilap.1052 [DOI]
  33. Skou P, Sihvonen P (2015) Ennominae I. In: Hausmann A (Ed.) Geometrid Moths of Europe, vol. 5, Brill, Leiden, 1–657. https://brill.com/display/title/24162
  34. Tóth B, Enyedi R, Katona G, Korompai T (2025) Revealing miracle: news on the dalmatian geometrid moth Mirlatia arcuata Hausmann, Mayr, László & Huemer, 2023 (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Natura Croatica 34(2): 277–290. 10.20302/NC.2025.34.20 [DOI]
  35. Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen LT, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44(W1): W232–W235. 10.1093/nar/gkw256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  36. Trusch R, Hausmann A (2007) A new species of the genus Rhodostrophia Hübner, 1823 from Iran (Geometridae: Sterrhinae). Nota Lepidopterologica 30: 7–16.
  37. Viidalepp J (2011) A morphological review of tribes in Larentiinae (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Zootaxa 3136(1): 1–44. 10.11646/zootaxa.3136.1.1 [DOI]
  38. Warren W (1904) New American Thyrididae, Uraniidae, and Geometridae. Novitates Zoologicae 11: 493–582. https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/24181#page/506/mode/1up
  39. Werner MJ, Hausmann A, Kostjuk I, Wanke D, Rajaei H (2023) Integrative taxonomic revision of the genus Phaselia Guenée, [1858] (Geometridae: Ennominae) in the Middle East and Central Asia. Zootaxa 5326(1): 1–66. 10.11646/zootaxa.5326.1.1 [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Molecular maximum likelihood phylogenetic hypothesis, including Mirlatia arcuata (highlighted in orange), inference by gene, full tree of 1206 terminal taxa

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0/). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this Dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.

Pasi Sihvonen, Kyung Min Lee, Balázs Tóth, Gergely Katona, Elina Laiho, Axel Hausmann

Data type

pdf

Explanation note

The analysis includes up to seven genes per terminal taxa. Numbers under the branches are support values SH-aLRT support (%) / ultrafast bootstrap support (%) from IQTREE2. A small part of the tree is shown in Fig. 2.

Data Availability Statement

All of the data that support the findings of this study are available in the main text or Supplementary Information.


Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES