Skip to main content
. 1999 Sep 9;65(4):1096–1103. doi: 10.1086/302579

Table 3.

Maximum Pairwise LOD Scores for Schizophrenia and Chromosome 8 Markers[Note]

Model
Recessive-Narrow
Recessive-Broad
Dominant-Narrow
Dominant-Broad
Locus MarkerPositiona Hetero-zygosityb LOD (hLODc) θ(αc) LOD (hLOD) θ (α) LOD (hLOD) θ(α) LOD (hLOD) θ(α)
D8S264 0 .85 .73 (.74) .2 (.90) .26 .3 .35 .3 .30 (.38) .3 (.70)
D8S1469 15 .82 .03 .4 0 .5 0 .5 .14 .4
D8S1130 21 .71 .57 (.61) .2 (.80) .11 (.12) .3 (.90) .52 (.53) .2 (.85) .32 (.54) .3 (.35)
D8S1106 25 .69 .72 .2 0 .5 0 (.18) .5 (.15) .67 (.88) .3 (.45)
D8S1145 36 .75 .81 (.81) .2 (.95) .39 (.53) .3 (.30) .50 .2 .35 (.38) .3 (.75)
D8S560d 43 .80 1.33 .2 .37 .3 .82 .2 .38 (.40) .2 (.35)
D8S136 43 .80 3.11 .1 .56 .3 3.49 .1 1.29 (1.31) .2 (.90)
D8S298d 44 .72 .90 .2 .98 .2 1.43 (1.47) .1 (.5) .87 (1.21) .3 (.55)
D8S1477 59 .81 .40 (.66) .3 (.30) 0 .5 .26 (.52) .3 (.30) .20 (.20) .4 (.75)
D8S1110 66 .78 .26 (.27) .3 (.15) 0 .5 .70 .3 .17 .4
D8S1113 77 .78 .06 .4 .08 .4 0 (0) .5 (.20) 0 .5
D8S1136 81 .70 .09 (.09) .3 (.95) 0 (0) .5 (.50) .21 .3 0 .5
D8S2324 93 .79 .08 .3 .25 .3 .02 .4 0 (0) .5 (.25)
D8S1119 100 .83 0 .5 0 .5 .10 .4 .06 .4
C8S14.2 109 .66 .44 (.46) .2 (.75) 0 .5 0 .5 0 .5
D8S1132 118 .87 .05 (.11) .3 (.40) 0 .5 .30 .3 0 .5
D8S592 124 .67 .05 (.05) .4 (.60) .15 (.21) .3 (.15) .15 .3 .08 .4
D8S1179 134 .78 0 .5 0 .5 0 .5 0 .5
D8S1128 138 .75 0 .5 .06 .4 .32 .3 .05 (.05) .4 (.95)
D8S256 147 .76 .08 (.10) .3 (.25) 0 (.06) .5 (.10) 0 .5 0 .5
D8S373 163 .73 .07 .4 .33 .3 0 .5 0 .5

Note.LOD=maximum homogeneity LOD score; hLOD=maximum heterogeneity LOD score.

a

In Kosambi centimorgans.

b

Determined from 30 unrelated family members.

c

For HOMOG analyses with α<1.

d

Not part of the Weber screening set.