Table 2.
Growth performance of Tibetan lambs (n = 30)
| Items1 | Treatments2 | SEM | P-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CON | L-HMB | M-HMB | H-HMB | |||
| Initial weight, kg | 16.71 | 16.88 | 16.62 | 16.62 | 0.072 | 0.532 |
| Final weight, kg | 37.19c | 38.05b | 38.96a | 37.43bc | 0.123 | < 0.001 |
| ADG, g/d | 228.89c | 234.90bc | 247.38a | 235.67b | 1.036 | < 0.001 |
| ADFI, g/d | 1761.73 | 1789.32 | 1,730.25 | 1754.06 | 9.695 | 0.193 |
| FCR | 7.70a | 7.62a | 7.01b | 7.46a | 0.054 | < 0.001 |
1ADG Average daily gain, ADFI Average daily feed intake, FCR Feed conversion ratio, ADFI/ADG
2HMB was supplemented at 0 mg/kg (CON group), 430 mg/kg (L-HMB), 715 mg/kg (M-HMB), and 1,000 mg/kg (H-HMB) of diet
a,b,cDifferent letters represent significant differences (P < 0.05)