Abstract
Curcumin, a natural polyphenol derived from Curcuma longa, exhibits potent multimodal anticancer activity by modulating critical oncogenic pathways (e.g., NF-κB, STAT3, PI3K/Akt/mTOR), inducing apoptosis, suppressing angiogenesis, and reversing multidrug resistance (MDR). However, its clinical translation is severely hindered by poor aqueous solubility, rapid metabolism, and negligible oral bioavailability (typically <1% in serum), which result in subtherapeutic concentrations at tumor sites. Smart nanoparticle delivery systems have emerged as a transformative strategy to overcome these limitations, enabling enhanced solubility, controlled release, and targeted accumulation in tumors. This review comprehensively summarizes the advancements in curcumin-loaded nanocarriers, including polymeric nanoparticles (e.g., PLGA, chitosan), lipid-based systems (e.g., liposomes, NLCs), inorganic nanoparticles (e.g., mesoporous silica, gold nanoparticles), and stimuli-responsive platforms (pH-, redox-, enzyme-sensitive). These nanosystems leverage passive targeting via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and active targeting through ligand conjugation (e.g., folate, transferrin, hyaluronic acid), significantly improving tumor-specific delivery and curcumin’s bioavailability—exemplified by a 178-fold increase in plasma AUC in healthy human volunteers following oral administration of the co-grinding formulation CUMINUP60® compared to standard crystalline curcumin. Preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate that nanoformulated curcumin synergizes with conventional chemo/radiotherapy, sensitizes resistant cancers, and modulates the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. For instance, Phase I/II trials indicate that formulations like nanomicellar curcumin (Sinacurcumin®) can modulate inflammatory cytokines, while liposomal variants (Lipocur™) have shown target engagement in metastatic cancers, albeit with the need for dose optimization. Hybrid nanocarriers co-delivering curcumin with chemotherapeutics or siRNA further augment therapeutic outcomes in models of colorectal, breast, pancreatic, and glioblastoma cancers. Despite these progresses, the gap between preclinical success and clinical translation remains significant. This review critically analyzes the barriers impeding commercialization, specifically highlighting the heterogeneity of the EPR effect, the lack of scalable GMP-compliant manufacturing for complex nanocarriers, and the regulatory hurdles regarding long-term biocompatibility and safety assessments.
Graphical Abstract

Introduction
Cancer remains a devastating global health challenge, with GLOBOCAN 2022 estimating 19.96 million new cases and 9.74 million deaths annually, where lung, breast, and colorectal cancers collectively account for over 30% of both incidence and mortality [1]. Conventional chemotherapy faces significant limitations including systemic toxicity, development of multidrug resistance (MDR), and inadequate tumor selectivity, which collectively compromise therapeutic efficacy and patient quality of life [2, 3]. These shortcomings underscore the urgent need for safer, more targeted therapeutic alternatives. Curcumin, a naturally occurring polyphenol derived from Curcuma longa, has emerged as a promising multimodal anticancer agent. Its mechanisms include induction of apoptosis through caspase activation, suppression of angiogenesis via VEGF inhibition, modulation of critical signaling pathways (NF-κB, MAPK, JAK/STAT), and regulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [4]. Notably, curcumin exhibits broad-spectrum activity against drug-resistant malignancies and demonstrates synergistic effects with conventional chemo/radiotherapy, potentially reversing MDR phenotypes [5].
Despite its therapeutic promise, curcumin’s clinical translation is severely hampered by profound pharmacokinetic challenges. It exhibits extremely poor aqueous solubility (<11 ng/mL), undergoes pH-dependent degradation, and is susceptible to rapid photoisomerization and hydrolysis [6]. Pharmacologically, it suffers from negligible oral bioavailability (<1%) due to extensive first-pass metabolism involving glucuronidation and sulfation, coupled with a short plasma half-life (~30 min) [7]. These limitations result in subtherapeutic drug concentrations at target sites. Metabolic studies reveal that curcumin undergoes rapid phase I reduction (forming dihydrocurcumin and tetrahydrocurcumin) and phase II conjugation, with these metabolites demonstrating altered biological activities compared to the parent compound [8]. Consequently, unmodified curcumin fails to achieve therapeutic plasma concentrations even at high doses (e.g., 8 g/day in clinical trials) [9].
Nanotechnology offers transformative solutions to overcome these barriers. Encapsulation within nanocarriers significantly enhances solubility through hydrophobic interactions and molecular encapsulation [10]. Passive targeting leverages the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, where nanoparticles (NPs) extravasate through the leaky vasculature of tumors and are retained due to impaired lymphatic drainage [11, 12]. Advanced nanocarrier systems include liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles (PLGA, chitosan), dendrimers, micelles, and inorganic hybrids (e.g., silica-lipid composites), which collectively comprise >99% of reported delivery platforms [13]. These systems not only improve pharmacokinetic profiles but also protect curcumin from degradation, extending systemic circulation time [14].
“Smart” nanocarriers represent the frontier of precision oncology, incorporating stimuli-responsive elements for spatiotemporal drug release. pH-responsive systems exploit the acidic tumor microenvironment (pH 5.5–6.8 versus physiological pH 7.4) using ionizable groups (amines, carboxylates) or acid-labile linkages (hydrazones, acetals) that trigger drug release upon protonation or bond cleavage [15, 16]. Enzyme-responsive carriers utilize tumor-overexpressed proteases (MMP-2/9, cathepsins) by incorporating cleavable peptide substrates that undergo enzymatic hydrolysis in the tumor microenvironment, releasing the payload [17–19]. Dendrimer-based systems, particularly polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers, enable high drug-loading capacity and facilitate nuclear targeting in cancer cells [20]. These intelligent designs enhance tumor-specific accumulation while minimizing off-target effects, thereby improving therapeutic indices [21, 22].
Recent preclinical and clinical studies demonstrate the efficacy of nanoformulated curcumin. Lipocur™ (liposomal curcumin) and Sinacurcumin® (nanomicellar formulation) have shown improved bioavailability and antitumor activity in clinical trials [23]. Phase I/II trials for various cancers (NCT04480502, NCT02465285) are evaluating liposomal curcumin in combination with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, with preliminary data indicating enhanced tumor suppression and reduced toxicity [24]. Nano-curcumin synergizes with chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., 5-Fluorouracil, doxorubicin) by sensitizing resistant cancer cells through downregulation of survival pathways like survivin and STAT3 [25, 26]. Hybrid nanocarriers co-delivering curcumin with siRNA (e.g., against survivin) demonstrate augmented tumor penetration and synergistic apoptosis induction in ovarian and cervical cancer models [27].
Despite promising advances, challenges remain in clinical translation. The EPR effect exhibits significant heterogeneity in human tumors compared to rodent models, necessitating patient stratification strategies [28, 29]. Scalability and reproducibility of nanocarrier manufacturing, along with long-term biocompatibility assessments, require further optimization [30]. Future research should focus on multifunctional “theranostic” nanoparticles combining imaging capabilities with targeted delivery, personalized formulations based on tumor biology, and combinatorial regimens leveraging nano-curcumin’s chemosensitizing properties [31, 32]. With continued innovation, smart nanodelivery systems hold immense potential to unlock curcumin’s full anticancer potential, transforming it from a dietary compound into a precision oncology therapeutic.
Curcumin and its anticancer mechanisms and advantages
Curcumin, the principal bioactive polyphenol derived from Curcuma longa, exerts multifaceted anticancer effects through the simultaneous modulation of critical oncogenic signaling pathways and epigenetic regulators [33, 34]. As illustrated in Fig. 1, its antitumor efficacy is driven by pleiotropic actions at both molecular and cellular levels: downregulating pro-survival factors (e.g., Bcl-2, Bcl-xL), inhibiting proliferation pathways (e.g., NF-κB, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, STAT3), inducing cell cycle arrest, and promoting programmed cell death [35, 36].
Fig. 1.
Illustration of main antitumor mechanisms of curcumin
Central to its mechanism is the potent inhibition of the STAT3 and NF-κB signaling axes, which are pivotal drivers of tumor proliferation, survival, and metastasis [37–39]. Curcumin prevents the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of these transcription factors, thereby suppressing the expression of downstream genes such as Survivin, VEGF, and MMP-9 [40, 41]. Concurrently, it disrupts the PI3K/Akt/mTOR cascade, balancing the interplay between apoptosis and protective autophagy, which often culminates in synergistic cell death in resistant cancer models [33, 42]. Recent studies have further elucidated novel mechanisms, highlighting curcumin’s ability to induce ferroptosis via the regulation of lipid peroxidation and the ACSL4 axis [43–46], as well as its role in modulating the tumor microenvironment (TME) [47–49].
Beyond specific signaling targets, curcumin exhibits broad-spectrum activity against multidrug resistance (MDR) [50–52]. It functions as a reversal agent by competitively inhibiting P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pumps and transcriptionally suppressing MDR1 expression via the AP-1 and NF-κB axes [51–53]. Curcumin enhances the cytotoxicity of conventional chemotherapeutics (e.g., doxorubicin, cisplatin, and oxaliplatin) by restoring intracellular drug accumulation, disrupting the Bcl-2/Bax equilibrium, and inhibiting COX-2 signaling [36, 53, 54]. Similarly, in glioblastoma, curcumin induces autophagic cell death via Akt/mTOR inhibition, while in pancreatic cancer, it targets constitutively active NF-κB to sensitize tumors to gemcitabine [55, 56]. Epigenetically, curcumin acts as a natural inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACs), promoting histone acetylation and reactivating silenced tumor suppressor genes such as p53 and p21 [57, 58]. These diverse molecular actions underscore curcumin’s therapeutic versatility, although its clinical application relies heavily on advanced delivery strategies to overcome pharmacokinetic barriers [33, 59].
Barriers to clinical application and physicochemical challenges
Physicochemical barriers
Curcumin, a polyphenolic compound with the chemical formula C₂₁H₂₀O₆, exhibits pronounced hydrophobicity (log P ≈ 3.2) and low aqueous solubility, which severely restricts its dissolution and bioavailability in physiological environments [24]. Its stability is critically compromised under physiological pH (7.4), where it undergoes rapid alkaline hydrolysis through nucleophilic attack on the α,β-unsaturated β-diketone moiety. This degradation follows first-order kinetics, with studies demonstrating that over 78% of free curcumin decomposes within 20 min at pH 7.4–8.0, yielding vanillin, ferulic acid, and cyclopentadiene derivatives as primary breakdown products [60, 61]. The degradation rate inversely correlates with acidity; curcumin remains relatively stable below pH 6.5 but becomes highly labile in neutral-to-alkaline conditions due to deprotonation of phenolic groups, which disrupts its conjugated diene structure and accelerates autoxidation [62, 63].
Compounding this instability, curcumin is susceptible to photoisomerization under UV/visible light exposure. Recent molecular dynamics simulations reveal that UV-A irradiation (350 nm) induces trans-cis configurational changes at the C═C double bonds in the heptadienone linker, generating photoisomers that serve as precursors for photodimerization via [2 + 2] cycloaddition or photooxidation (H₂-loss) pathways [64]. This photochemical reactivity not only diminishes curcumin’s bioactivity but also complicates experimental reproducibility, as uncontrolled light exposure during handling can artifactually alter its pharmacological profile [65]. The dual vulnerability to pH-dependent hydrolysis and photoisomerization results in a plasma half-life of less than 10 min in vivo, drastically curtailing its therapeutic efficacy [66].
To overcome these challenges, nanotechnology-driven delivery systems have emerged as indispensable strategies. Nanoencapsulation within liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, or lipid-based carriers physically shields curcumin from hydrolytic enzymes and ambient light while enhancing dispersibility [10]. For instance, liposomal encapsulation in phosphatidylcholine bilayers or polymeric matrices like PLGA (poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)) creates a hydrophobic microenvironment that stabilizes the keto-enol tautomer—the pharmacologically active form of curcumin [67]. Surface functionalization of nanocarriers with targeting ligands (e.g., folic acid) further exploits tumor microenvironment features (e.g., acidic pH, overexpressed receptors) to facilitate selective cellular uptake and reduce off-target degradation [68]. Notably, studies have confirmed that nanoemulsions and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) elevate curcumin’s aqueous solubility by >10,000-fold. For instance, Wang et al. demonstrated that optimized SLNs extended the half-life to >24 h and achieved a 26-fold increase in oral bioavailability in rats compared to unformulated curcumin suspensions [69, 70]. These advances underscore nanotechnology’s pivotal role in transforming curcumin from a labile phytochemical into a viable anticancer agent.
Biological and anatomical barriers
Curcumin faces significant tissue-specific barriers that impede therapeutic efficacy. In glioblastoma (GBM) [71], the blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts curcumin penetration into tumor sites. The BBB comprises tight-junction endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes that collectively limit paracellular diffusion of macromolecules. While GBM disrupts some BBB integrity, invasive tumor regions often retain functional efflux transporters like P-gp, which actively expels curcumin. Consequently, therapeutic concentrations in brain tumors remain suboptimal, undermining curcumin’s potential to modulate pathways like p53 and JAK/STAT in GBM [72, 73].
Simultaneously, safety concerns regarding high-dose administration present another limitation. High-dose free curcumin exhibits dose-dependent hepatotoxicity, mechanistically arising from mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS overproduction, and activation of necroptosis pathways involving RIPK1/RIPK3 complexes in hepatic cells [74]. Clinical reports note elevated serum ALT/AST levels in some patients consuming >8 g/day of unformulated curcumin [75]. This necessitates a delicate balance between achieving therapeutic concentrations and avoiding systemic toxicity.
To address these multifaceted challenges—ranging from poor aqueous solubility and rapid metabolism to anatomical barriers and toxicity—advanced nanoparticle delivery systems have emerged as a transformative solution. These nanoformulations (e.g., liposomes, polymeric NPs) not only enhance pharmacokinetics but also actively modulate the tumor microenvironment (TME) by inhibiting myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and cancer-associated mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) [76, 77]. Similarly, TME-responsive nanoplatforms utilize stimuli like hypoxia, redox imbalance, and enzymatic activity to achieve precise drug release [78]. Recent advancements include solvent-free co-grinding formulations (e.g., CUMINUP60®), which elevate the plasma AUC of curcumin in healthy volunteers by 178-fold following oral administration compared to standard extracts, primarily through improved dissolution and metabolic stability [79]. These strategies not only enhance bioavailability but also facilitate the co-delivery of curcumin with chemotherapeutics, as seen in nanomicelles loaded with doxorubicin and curcumin, which effectively reverse MDR in lung cancer [80].
Advanced nanostrategies to overcome limitations
Curcumin’s therapeutic potential in oncology is significantly constrained by its intrinsic physicochemical limitations, particularly its extremely poor aqueous solubility and susceptibility to alkaline degradation [81]. As summarized in Table 1, specific nanocarrier platforms have been developed to directly counteract not only physicochemical barriers but also biological hurdles such as poor tissue penetration and drug resistance. While the specific mechanisms of targeting and efficacy are detailed in sections “Smart nanocarriers for curcumin delivery” and “Curcumin-loaded nanomedicines in cancer therapy”, this table provides a comprehensive overview of the quantifiable improvements achieved across all these domains. Encapsulation within lipid-based and supramolecular nanostructures has emerged as a primary strategy; liposomes provide bilayer sequestration that enhances solubility while preserving membrane permeability advantages [82], whereas polymeric micelles (e.g., Pluronic/PCL systems) achieve solubilization capacities up to g/L ranges through hydrophobic core entrapment [83]. Cyclodextrin complexes, particularly those employing γ-cyclodextrin derivatives, leverage macrocyclic cavities to form inclusion complexes that improve solubility by orders of magnitude while protecting the labile β-diketone moiety from hydrolytic degradation [84, 85].
Table 1.
Comparative summary of curcumin’s barriers and nanocarrier-mediated improvements
| Physicochemical barrier | Baseline value/characteristic (curcumin) | Nanocarrier strategy | Quantifiable improvement | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aqueous solubility | Extremely low (<11 ng/mL); Hydrophobic | Cyclodextrin Complexes | 1237-fold increase in solubility. | [84] |
| Solid Lipid NPs (SLNs) | >10,000-fold increase in aqueous solubility. | [69, 70] | ||
| Systemic stability | Rapid degradation at physiological pH | PLGA Nanoparticles | Colloidal stability maintained for >1 month. | [97] |
| Liposomes | Significant protection from hydrolysis (stabilizes keto-enol form). | [67] | ||
| Oral bioavailability | Negligible (<1%) | Co-grinding formulation | 178-fold increase in plasma AUC (in humans). | [79] |
| PLGA nanoparticles | 22-fold increase in oral bioavailability (in rats). | [97] | ||
| Solid Lipid NPs (SLNs) | 26-fold increase in oral bioavailability (in rats). | [70] | ||
| NLCs | 11.93-fold increase in oral bioavailability. | [108] | ||
| Tissue targeting | Poor accumulation; BBB restriction | Transferrin-conjugated NPs | 8-fold increase in brain concentration. | [206, 207] |
| HA-decorated Liposomes | 3.3-fold higher tumor drug accumulation. | [178–180] | ||
| Tumor penetration | Limited diffusion in dense stroma | RGD-Albumin NPs | 200% improvement in stromal diffusion. | [193] |
| Therapeutic efficacy | Drug resistance/High dose req. | Au-Curcumin conjugates | 56–73% enhancement in radiation sensitivity. | [133] |
| CUR-DOX PLGA NPs | 3-fold higher apoptosis rate vs. monotherapy. | [223] |
Stabilization innovations address curcumin’s rapid metabolic and photochemical degradation. PEGylation creates steric hydration barriers that reduce opsonization and extend systemic circulation by >10-fold—critical for tumor accumulation via the EPR effect [86]. Concurrently, antioxidant co-loading (e.g., vitamin E TPGS) synergistically enhances oxidative stability while acting as an emulsifier in PLGA nanoparticles, where its amphiphilic structure simultaneously inhibits peroxyl radical-mediated degradation and improves cellular uptake [87, 88]. pH-responsive systems, such as Eudragit S100-coated liposomes, further prevent gastric degradation while enabling targeted colonic release, demonstrating >98% encapsulation efficiency and controlled payload retention [89].
Bioavailability enhancement leverages both lipidic and crystalline nanoarchitectures. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) generate nanoemulsions (<50 nm) spontaneously upon intestinal exposure, facilitating lymphatic transport that bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism [90]. Recent SEDDS formulations increase oral bioavailability by 1.4–4.3-fold through mixed micelle-mediated solubilization and P-gp inhibition [91]. Nanocrystal technology concurrently addresses dissolution limitations; particle size reduction to 200–500 nm amplifies saturation solubility by 26-fold and dissolution velocity via the Noyes-Whitney equation [92], while surface adhesion to intestinal mucosa prolongs residence time. Solidified SNEDDS and nanocrystal-embedded oral films now enable dose reduction while maintaining pharmacokinetic advantages, as evidenced by fenofibrate nanocrystals showing 1.8-fold higher AUC0-∞ [93].
These nano-strategies collectively enhance therapeutic indices in preclinical oncology models. Cyclodextrin-curcumin complexes exhibit 1237-fold solubility improvements enabling prolonged tumor suppression, while albumin-coated liposomes extend half-life and potentiate cytotoxicity in cisplatin-resistant cancers [84]. Clinical translation is accelerating, with >210 trials investigating nanoformulated curcumin—including phase II studies of micellar curcumin for pancreatic cancer and lipid-polymer hybrids for colorectal malignancies [94, 95]. Nevertheless, industrial scalability and regulatory hurdles remain, particularly concerning long-term stability of colloidal systems and carrier metabolite toxicology [96]. Future development requires rational integration of multifunctional designs—such as PEGylated cyclodextrin-liposome hybrids—to harmonize solubilization, stabilization, and targeted delivery within a single platform.
Nanocarrier platforms and smart strategies for curcumin delivery
Current nanocarrier strategies can be broadly categorized into two dimensions: the foundational material platforms (e.g., polymers, lipids, inorganic matrices) and the functionalization strategies used to impart ‘smart’ capabilities (e.g., stimuli-responsiveness, active targeting). This section first reviews the major carrier types and subsequently discusses the advanced functionalization strategies applied to them (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Advantages of curcumin-loaded nanoparticle delivery systems for enhanced anti-tumor therapy
Polymeric nanoparticles
The development of smart nanoparticle delivery systems represents a transformative strategy to overcome the intrinsic limitations of curcumin—a potent natural compound with multifaceted anticancer properties—including its extremely poor aqueous solubility, rapid systemic metabolism, and consequent low oral bioavailability. Among polymeric nanocarriers, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles stand out due to their exceptional biocompatibility, biodegradability, and tunable drug release kinetics. Recent advancements demonstrate that PLGA encapsulation significantly enhances curcumin’s pharmacokinetic profile; notably, PLGA nanoparticles have been shown to increase oral bioavailability in Wistar rats by up to 22-fold compared to unformulated curcumin, primarily by protecting the payload from gastric degradation and facilitating intestinal absorption [97]. This is achieved through optimized fabrication techniques like emulsion-solvent evaporation, yielding particles with sizes around 145 nm, a zeta potential of approximately −21.8 mV, and encapsulation efficiencies reaching 94% in optimized formulations, while maintaining colloidal stability for at least 1 month under physiological conditions [97]. The release kinetics are governed by a combination of diffusion through the polymer matrix and polymer relaxation, allowing for sustained delivery. Beyond bioavailability enhancement, PLGA nanocarriers enable targeted delivery to tumor sites. For instance, surface modification with Tet-1 peptide facilitates blood-brain barrier penetration for glioblastoma and Alzheimer’s therapy, while PLGA-TPGS (d-α-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol succinate) nanoparticles exhibit preferential accumulation in hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cells, significantly improving antitumor efficacy and reducing systemic toxicity in vivo [98, 99]. Recent work in 2024 further highlights PLGA-curcumin’s role in mitigating diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting renal apoptosis via Bcl-2 protein modulation [100].
Beyond synthetic polymers, chitosan-based nanoparticles leverage unique bioadhesive properties and positive surface charge to enhance mucoadhesion and prolong gastrointestinal residence time, critical for improving curcumin absorption. Chitosan-gum arabic hybrid nanoparticles, in particular, demonstrate enhanced cellular uptake in colorectal cancer models compared to free curcumin, leading to superior tumor suppression through prolonged cellular exposure and reduced IC50 values [101]. The protonation of chitosan’s amine groups in the acidic tumor microenvironment or upon endosomal internalization (the “proton sponge” effect) promotes endosomal escape, ensuring efficient intracellular curcumin delivery [102]. This mechanism underpins the efficacy of chitosan-curcumin nanoparticles (CUR-CS-NP) in colorectal cancer, where they significantly downregulate pro-inflammatory NF-κB signaling and inhibit foam cell formation [103]. Innovations include thiolated chitosan for improved permeation and composite systems like chitosan-eugenol-curcumin nanoconjugates, which exhibit synergistic cytotoxicity against colon cancer cells while inducing DNA fragmentation and apoptosis [104]. Gelatin-based nanocarriers, recognized for their high biocompatibility and FDA approval status, offer another proteinaceous platform for controlled curcumin release. Their gel-forming capability allows precise modulation of release profiles, making them suitable for sustained delivery applications in tissue regeneration and localized cancer therapy. However, challenges remain in maintaining gelatin’s physicochemical stability across varying biological environments, particularly concerning solubility modulation and long-term storage stability, which are active areas of investigation [105].
Collectively, polymeric nanocarriers (PLGA, chitosan, gelatin) provide versatile platforms to enhance curcumin’s therapeutic index. PLGA excels in bioavailability enhancement and controlled release, chitosan leverages mucoadhesion and tumor microenvironment responsiveness, and gelatin offers exceptional biocompatibility for sustained delivery. While significant progress has been made in optimizing encapsulation efficiency, stability, and targeted delivery, ongoing research focuses on refining stimuli-responsive behaviors (e.g., pH-, enzyme-, or redox-triggered release), improving tumor-specific accumulation through advanced surface functionalization, and conducting comprehensive long-term toxicity assessments to accelerate clinical translation [10]. The convergence of material science and nanomedicine continues to drive innovations in these smart delivery systems, holding substantial promise for unlocking curcumin’s full anticancer potential.
Lipid-based nanocarriers
Among lipid-based nanocarriers, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in enhancing lymphatic uptake and drug payload capacity. SLNs, composed of solid lipids, provide a stable matrix that protects curcumin from degradation and enables controlled release. However, NLCs—a second-generation system blending solid and liquid lipids—address critical limitations of SLNs, such as drug expulsion during storage and limited loading capacity. The imperfect crystalline structure of NLCs allows for higher drug encapsulation (up to 90–99%) and significantly curtails premature leakage, thereby optimizing therapeutic delivery [106, 107]. In vivo studies underscore the superiority of NLCs; for instance, Fang et al. reported that curcumin-loaded NLCs enhanced oral bioavailability (with an AUC increase of up to 11.93-fold) compared to free curcumin, attributed to improved solubilization, prolonged gastric residence, and enhanced intestinal adhesion [108]. Furthermore, several in vitro and in vivo evaluations demonstrated that NLC encapsulation significantly extended the plasma half-life of curcumin, maintaining therapeutic concentrations for a longer duration compared to the rapid elimination of free curcumin [109, 110]. Moreover, in prostate cancer xenograft models, NLCs reduced tumor volume by 40% through enhanced cellular uptake and sustained apoptosis induction, without systemic toxicity [111].
The enhanced bioavailability of lipid-based systems stems from multifaceted mechanisms. Lipid nanoparticles activate biliary and pancreatic secretions, promoting lipid digestion and micelle formation, which facilitates curcumin absorption [112]. Their nano-scale size (typically 10–200 nm) and surface properties enable uptake through enterocytes via clathrin-mediated endocytosis or macropinocytosis, while hydrophobic interactions with chylomicrons further direct them to lymphatic circulation, evading hepatic metabolism [113]. Comparative analyses reveal that NLCs outperform SLNs in lymphatic targeting due to their optimized particle size (ideally <100 nm) and negative zeta potential, which prolong residence in Peyer’s patches and enhance M-cell-mediated translocation [114].
Beyond synthetic lipid systems, biomimetic nanocarriers like liposomes and exosomes leverage natural targeting mechanisms. Liposomes, with phospholipid bilayers mimicking cell membranes, encapsulate curcumin within hydrophobic or aqueous compartments, improving stability and enabling surface functionalization for active targeting [115]. Exosomes, endogenous nanovesicles derived from cells, offer superior biocompatibility and low immunogenicity. Engineered exosomes loaded with curcumin achieve approximately 5-fold higher plasma concentrations in murine models than free curcumin and exhibit innate tropism toward inflammatory or tumor sites [116]. For example, macrophage-derived exosomes deliver curcumin to activated monocytes, reducing inflammation in LPS-induced septic shock models and suppressing tumor growth via enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects [117, 118]. Recent innovations include exosomes functionalized with targeting ligands (e.g., RGD peptides or GE11), which further refine tumor-specific delivery through receptor-mediated endocytosis [119, 120].
Despite these advancements, clinical translation faces challenges, including scalable production, long-term stability, and regulatory hurdles. While lipid-based carriers dominate current research due to their manufacturability and proven efficacy, exosome-based systems require standardized isolation and loading protocols to ensure batch consistency [121]. Ongoing clinical trials focus on optimizing these nanoplatforms, with hybrid approaches—such as exosome-liposome fusions—emerging as promising strategies to synergize natural targeting with high drug-loading capacity [122].
In conclusion, lipid-based and biomimetic nanocarriers have revolutionized curcumin delivery, transforming a molecule with poor bioavailability into a potent anticancer agent. NLCs, with their enhanced payload and lymphatic targeting, and exosomes, with their innate biocompatibility and precision, exemplify the convergence of material science and biology in advancing targeted cancer therapy.
Inorganic nanoparticles
Mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) represent a cornerstone in inorganic nanocarrier design for curcumin delivery, leveraging their highly ordered honeycomb-like porous architecture with tunable pore diameters typically ranging from 2 to 10 nm [123]. This structural specificity directly governs drug release kinetics: larger pore dimensions accelerate molecular diffusion, substantially reducing the release half-life by minimizing steric hindrance and surface adsorption effects [124, 125]. The exceptional drug-loading capacity (>700 m²/g surface area and >0.6 cm³/g pore volume) stems from their vast internal surface decorated with abundant silanol groups, enabling efficient adsorption of hydrophobic curcumin molecules irrespective of aqueous solubility limitations [126, 127]. Surface functionalization strategies—particularly amine grafting—further optimize payload retention and sustained release profiles. For instance, amine-functionalized MSNs with 4.7 nm pores demonstrated 8.8% cumulative curcumin release, significantly exceeding the 1.5% observed in smaller-pore (1.8 nm) analogs, underscoring the critical role of pore size in release modulation [128]. Recent advances in 2024 have elucidated how pore geometry influences not only release kinetics but also cellular internalization pathways and immunomodulatory responses, highlighting the multifactorial optimization required for precision oncology applications [129].
Beyond silica-based systems, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) offer distinct therapeutic advantages through photothermal conversion capabilities. When irradiated with near-infrared (NIR) light, AuNPs undergo localized surface plasmon resonance, generating hyperthermia (42–45 °C) that selectively ablates tumor cells while sparing healthy tissues [130, 131]. This photothermal effect synergizes with curcumin’s chemotherapeutic action: AuNP-curcumin conjugates disrupt mitochondrial membrane potential, amplify reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and downregulate oncogenic pathways (VEGF, STAT-3) more effectively than either modality alone [132]. A 2024 preclinical study on cervical cancer demonstrated that Au-curcumin nanocomposites enhanced radiation sensitivity by 56–73%, achieving tumor regression through dual DNA damage potentiation and heat-shock protein inhibition [133]. The combinatorial approach addresses curcumin’s pharmacokinetic limitations—rapid systemic clearance and enzymatic degradation—while exploiting AuNPs’ deep-tissue NIR penetrance (up to 1 cm) for spatially controlled therapy [134, 135].
Comparative analyses of inorganic nanocarriers reveal trade-offs between functionality and biocompatibility. While quantum dots offer optical tracking capabilities, cadmium-based variants pose toxicity risks due to heavy metal leaching [136]. Iron oxide nanoparticles enable magnetic targeting but may accumulate in reticuloendothelial organs, causing oxidative stress [137]. MSNs exhibit superior biocompatibility and renal clearance when surface-modified with polyethylene glycol (PEG), though their degradation kinetics require careful calibration to prevent silicon accumulation [138, 139]. Gold nanoparticles, while generally biocompatible, necessitate rigorous size control (<20 nm) to avoid aggregation-induced embolism. Current biocompatibility assessments employ high-resolution imaging (scanning probe microscopy) to monitor nanocarrier-cell interactions and quantitative ROS assays to predict inflammatory sequelae [140]. Ongoing clinical evaluations (e.g., NCT04818333, NCT05516524) focus on translating these inorganic platforms into targeted curcumin delivery systems that balance anticancer efficacy with systemic safety [24].
Having discussed the foundational material platforms (polymers, lipids, and inorganic matrices), the following sections focus on the functionalization strategies—specifically stimuli-responsiveness and active targeting—that upgrade these carriers from passive vehicles to ‘smart’ nanomedicines.
Functionalization strategy I: stimuli-responsive systems
Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers represent a pivotal advancement in targeted curcumin delivery, leveraging distinct pathological cues within tumor microenvironments to achieve site-specific drug release with minimized off-target effects. pH-sensitive systems exploit the acidic extracellular conditions of tumors (pH 6.5–7.0), which differ markedly from physiological pH (7.4). These carriers typically utilize polymers functionalized with ionizable groups (e.g., carboxyl or amine moieties) that undergo protonation-deprotonation transitions, triggering conformational changes or degradation of acid-labile bonds (e.g., hydrazone or acetal linkages) to release curcumin [141]. For instance, chitosan-alginate nanoparticles synthesized via aerosol-assisted methods exhibit pH-dependent swelling in acidic environments, enhancing curcumin release in tumor sites [142]. Similarly, carboxymethyl cellulose/starch/reduced graphene oxide composites demonstrate accelerated drug elution under acidic conditions due to protonation-induced matrix relaxation [143]. Recent innovations include lysine-functionalized mesoporous silica hybrids, which optimize pH-triggered release kinetics while improving cellular uptake [144].
Redox-responsive systems capitalize on elevated glutathione (GSH) levels (2–10 mM) in tumor cells versus normal tissues (2–20 μM). These carriers incorporate disulfide bonds (-S-S-) that undergo cleavage in reductive intracellular compartments, facilitating cytosolic curcumin release. Redox-active nanomaterials, such as disulfide-crosslinked polymeric micelles or liposomes, enhance tumor specificity by exploiting GSH gradients [145, 146]. For example, polyplexes with disulfide bonds enable rapid payload release upon exposure to intracellular reductases, significantly improving therapeutic indices in drug-resistant cancers [147]. Recent studies highlight dual redox/enzyme-responsive liposomes that synergistically degrade via phospholipase A2 and GSH, augmenting curcumin bioavailability and suppressing oxidative stress in cancer cells [148]. Inorganic hybrids also leverage this mechanism; for instance, Au-curcumin conjugates designed to release their payload in the reductive tumor environment have been shown to enhance radiation sensitivity by up to 73%, effectively coupling chemotherapy with radiotherapy [133].
Enzyme-activated carriers target overexpressed proteases like matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in tumor stroma. MMP-cleavable peptide sequences (e.g., GPLG, PVGLIG) are engineered into nanogel backbones, enabling enzymatic hydrolysis and localized drug liberation [149, 150]. A 2024 study demonstrated MMP-2-responsive peptide hydrogels that disintegrate upon enzyme contact, releasing encapsulated curcumin to inhibit pancreatic tumor progression, resulting in a 40% reduction in tumor volume in preclinical evaluations [151]. Similarly, gelatin-based dual stimuli-responsive hydrogels incorporate MMP-sensitive linkers alongside pH-sensitive groups, achieving cascaded drug release in response to tumor-specific enzymatic and acidic cues [152, 153]. This strategy minimizes premature leakage while maximizing intratumoral accumulation.
Multi-stimuli responsive nanoplatforms integrate complementary triggers (e.g., pH/redox, pH/enzyme) to overcome limitations of single-stimulus systems. pH/redox dual-responsive polyplexes exhibit “cascade” release: acidic pH induces nanoparticle swelling and endosomal escape, followed by GSH-triggered disulfide cleavage for cytoplasmic curcumin delivery [154]. Thermo/pH-sensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-allylamine) nanogels expand under hyperthermia (40 °C) and acidic pH, enhancing drug penetration in hypoxic tumors [153]. Such systems demonstrate 3–5-fold higher bioavailability than monoresponsive carriers by exploiting synergistic microenvironmental triggers [155].
These smart nanocarriers substantially enhance curcumin’s anticancer efficacy by improving pharmacokinetics, tumor accumulation (via EPR effect), and cellular internalization. Nanoencapsulation protects curcumin from rapid metabolism, extending systemic circulation and enabling passive targeting [156]. Recent clinical translations emphasize stimuli-responsive designs as promising strategies to overcome curcumin’s poor solubility and bioavailability, paving the way for next-generation targeted cancer therapies [157].
Functionalization strategy II: active targeting strategies
Active targeting strategies represent a pivotal advancement in nanocarrier systems for curcumin delivery, specifically designed to overcome the limitations of passive accumulation by exploiting receptor-mediated endocytosis pathways. Ligand-conjugated nanoparticles, such as those functionalized with folate, transferrin, or aptamers, exhibit enhanced specificity toward tumor cells overexpressing corresponding receptors. Folate receptors (FRα) are frequently overexpressed in epithelial cancers (e.g., ovarian, breast), enabling folate-decorated nanocarriers to selectively deliver curcumin while minimizing off-target effects [158]. Similarly, transferrin receptors (TfR) are upregulated in metastatic cancers; transferrin-conjugated systems facilitate cellular uptake and can bypass multidrug resistance mechanisms by evading P-gp efflux [159]. Aptamers—single-stranded DNA/RNA oligonucleotides selected via SELEX—offer high binding affinity, low immunogenicity, and superior tumor penetration compared to antibodies. Recent innovations include aptamer-siRNA chimeras for combinatorial gene silencing and curcumin delivery, demonstrating enhanced cytotoxicity in prostate cancer models [160].
Hyaluronic acid (HA)-functionalized nanocarriers exemplify precision targeting for colorectal cancer, where CD44—a transmembrane glycoprotein linked to cancer stemness, metastasis, and chemoresistance—is abundantly overexpressed. HA-modified nanoparticles exploit CD44-mediated endocytosis to boost cellular internalization and tumor accumulation. For instance, HA-grafted PLGA micelles loaded with doxorubicin (as a model therapeutic) showed 118.2 nm diameters and 7.2% drug loading, achieving significantly higher cytotoxicity in CD44 + HCT-116 colon cancer cells than in non-tumor cells [161]. In vivo studies corroborate this: curcumin-loaded HA/TPGS nanoparticles radiolabeled with ⁹⁹ᵐTc revealed preferential biodistribution to tumors via SPECT/CT imaging, underscoring HA’s role in enhancing tumor-specific delivery [162]. This strategy not only amplifies curcumin’s anticancer efficacy but also reduces systemic toxicity by limiting exposure to healthy tissues.
Comparative analyses highlight context-dependent advantages of ligand selection. Folate targeting excels in FRα-high cancers (e.g., ovarian), where folate-PEG-g-polyaspartamide micelles co-delivering cisplatin and curcumin exhibit synergistic effects and extended survival in xenograft models. Transferrin ligands, however, prove more effective against TfR-rich, aggressive tumors, particularly in overcoming drug efflux mechanisms. Dual-ligand systems—e.g., folate and transferrin-decorated polymeric magnetic nanoparticles—further optimize specificity and uptake. These co-deliver curcumin with 5-fluorouracil (5FU), generating pH-responsive, sustained release and hyperthermia-enhanced apoptosis, with combination indices as low as 0.2–0.35 confirming potent synergy [163]. Such systems exemplify how multiplexed targeting addresses tumor heterogeneity and resistance.
Emerging biomimetic approaches push these frontiers further. Biomimetic exosomes engineered with HA or aptamers via genetic or chemical modifications enhance active targeting while evading immune clearance [164]. Additionally, platelet membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles incorporating prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) demonstrate dual targeting and reparative functions in ischemic injury models, suggesting translatability for metastatic sites [165]. Despite promise, scalability, long-term biocompatibility, and ligand stability during circulation require optimization. Future work should prioritize in vivo validations of multi-ligand curcumin nanoformulations, especially in CD44+ colorectal metastases, to translate lab efficacy into clinical oncology tools [166] (Tables 2).
Table 2.
Stimuli-responsive mechanisms for targeted curcumin release
| Stimulus type | Trigger in tumor microenvironment/external source | Carrier design feature | Release kinetics/mechanism | Efficacy in preclinical models | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH-sensitive | Extracellular pH 6.5–7.0; endosomal pH 5.0–6.0 | Ionizable groups (amines/carboxylates); acid-labile linkages (hydrazones) | 3-fold faster release at pH 5.0–6.0 vs. pH 7.4 | ~50% tumor regression in breast cancer (Cur@HFn nanocages) | [238] |
| Redox-sensitive | High intracellular GSH (2–10 mM) | Disulfide crosslinked polymers (-S-S-) | Rapid cleavage in reductive environments | 73% enhanced radiation sensitivity (Au-curcumin conjugates) | [133] |
| Enzyme-responsive | Overexpressed MMP-2/9, cathepsins | Cleavable peptide substrates (e.g., GPLG, PVGLIG) | Enzymatic hydrolysis-driven release | 40% tumor volume reduction (MMP-2-responsive hydrogels) | [151] |
| Multi-stimuli | pH + redox; pH + enzyme | Combined ionizable groups and disulfide bonds | Cascaded release (e.g., pH-triggered swelling → redox cleavage) | 3–5-fold higher bioavailability vs. monoresponsive systems | [155] |
| External Stimuli (Light/Magnetic) | NIR Light; Magnetic Field | AuNPs (SPR effect); SPIONs (Magnetic targeting) | Photothermal-triggered release; Magnetic guidance & heating | 60% tumor suppression in colorectal cancer (Dual-labeled SPIONs) | [249] |
Curcumin-loaded nanomedicines in cancer therapy
Colorectal cancer
The application of curcumin-loaded nanomedicines in colorectal cancer (CRC) therapy has demonstrated substantial preclinical and clinical promise, leveraging advanced delivery systems to overcome inherent bioavailability limitations. In preclinical models, curcumin encapsulated in MPEG-PCL micelles (25 mg/kg) achieved a 50% reduction in tumor volume in C26 murine colon carcinoma xenografts, attributed to its exceptional encapsulation efficiency (99%) and drug loading capacity (12.95%) [167]. Notably, NLCs generally exhibit superior bioavailability (e.g., 12-fold enhancement) and tumor suppression compared to PLGA (9.2-fold), owing to their lipid-based architecture that enhances intestinal absorption and lymphatic transport [168, 169].
Clinically, curcumin nanoformulations combined with conventional chemotherapy regimens have yielded encouraging outcomes. In a Phase II trial (NCT02439385) involving 44 patients, nanostructured lipid carriers (G-NLC) co-administered with FOLFIRI/Bev (Folinic acid, Fluorouracil, and Irinotecan/Bevacizumab) in metastatic CRC patients reported a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.8 months and overall survival (OS) of 30.7 months. Tumor response rates included 20% partial response (PR) and 63.6% disease control rate(DCR), underscoring the role of nanocarriers in potentiating chemotherapeutic efficacy [170, 171]. Furthermore, the randomized Phase IIa CUFOX trial revealed that curcumin combined with FOLFOX significantly improved OS (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.339, p = 0.016) compared to chemotherapy alone (HR: 0.571, p = 0.200). Notably, the objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in the curcumin group (53.3%) compared to the control group (11.1%, p = 0.039). This OS advantage may stem from curcumin’s ability to modulate inflammatory pathways like NF-κB and STAT3 and synergize with cytotoxic agents to enhance apoptosis [172].
Recent innovations focus on refining targeted delivery mechanisms to optimize tumor-specific accumulation. Folate-functionalized nanoparticles, such as FA-PEG-CUR-SPC NPs, exploit overexpressed folate receptors on CRC cells, enhancing cellular uptake and reducing off-target effects. These systems exhibit pH-responsive release, with drug liberation at tumor sites (pH 6.4) occurring threefold faster than in systemic circulation (pH 7.4), thereby maximizing local drug concentration. Additionally, enzyme-sensitive designs (e.g., matrix metalloproteinase-triggered NPs) and immunotargeted approaches (e.g., anti-L1-CAM antibody-conjugated diatomite nanoparticles) further augment tumor selectivity and mitigate multidrug resistance mechanisms common in CRC [173, 174]. Despite these advances, challenges persist, including scalable production and long-term toxicity profiles. Nevertheless, the integration of nanocarriers with biocompatible materials (e.g., cellulose nanocrystals) and real-time biodistribution monitoring holds transformative potential for CRC therapy [175, 176].
In summary, nanoengineered curcumin delivery systems represent a paradigm shift in CRC treatment, enhancing bioavailability, tumor targeting, and therapeutic synergy with conventional regimens. Ongoing clinical evaluations and innovative nanoplatforms continue to bridge translational gaps, promising improved patient outcomes.
Breast cancer (triple-negative focus)
The application of hyaluronic acid (HA)-decorated liposomes for curcumin delivery represents a cutting-edge strategy to overcome the therapeutic challenges of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype characterized by the absence of estrogen, progesterone, and HER2 receptors, which limits treatment options and portends a poor prognosis. TNBC frequently exhibits overexpression of CD44 receptors, particularly in cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) that drive tumor initiation, metastasis, and chemoresistance [177]. In the context of TNBC, leveraging the HA-CD44 targeting strategy described in section “Functionalization strategy II: active targeting strategies” is particularly advantageous due to the dense overexpression of CD44 on TNBC cells and cancer stem-like cells (CSCs). By exploiting this receptor-mediated endocytosis, HA-decorated liposomes achieved 3.3-fold higher tumor accumulation compared to free curcumin [178–180].
Preclinical studies using MDA-MB-231 xenograft models demonstrate the potency of this approach. HA-curcumin liposomes achieve approximately 70% suppression of pulmonary metastasis, attributed to dual mechanisms: direct cytotoxicity against bulk tumor cells and disruption of CSC self-renewal [181]. The formulation inhibits key oncogenic pathways, including RhoA/ROCK and PI3K/Akt signaling, which are hyperactivated by CD44-HA interactions in metastatic TNBC. This downregulates anti-apoptotic proteins (e.g., Bcl-2, XIAP), metastasis-promoting factors (e.g., MMP-9, VEGF), and transcription factors like NF-κB, thereby inducing apoptosis and suppressing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) [182]. Additionally, by targeting CD44+ CSCs, the system reduces aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-positive populations and tumor-initiating capacity, crucial for preventing recurrence.
Beyond metastasis control, HA-curcumin liposomes enhance bioavailability—a critical hurdle given curcumin’s poor solubility and rapid metabolism. Encapsulation protects curcumin from degradation, prolongs systemic circulation, and leverages the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect for passive tumor accumulation. When combined with HA’s active targeting, this results in 3.3-fold higher tumor drug concentrations compared to free curcumin [183, 184]. In vivo, this translates to significant primary tumor regression (>50% volume reduction) and reduced metastatic burden in lung tissue, validated by histopathology and bioluminescent imaging [185].
Comparative studies highlight advantages over other nanocarriers. While polymeric nanoparticles (e.g., PLGA) and micelles also improve solubility, HA-liposomes exhibit superior CD44-specific cellular uptake and deeper tumor penetration. For instance, pH-sensitive liposomes show efficacy but lack active targeting [186]. Magnetic nanoparticles enable external guidance yet face biocompatibility concerns [187]. HA-liposomes further outperform non-targeted liposomes, as PEGylation alone fails to enhance intracellular delivery despite prolonging circulation [182]. Dual-coated systems (e.g., PEG-HA liposomes) optimize both stealth properties and targeted uptake, achieving 1.7-fold higher tumor inhibition than passive carriers [186].
Despite promise, challenges remain. HA molecular weight influences binding affinity; high-MW HA (175–350 kDa) optimizes CD44 engagement but accelerates blood clearance, necessitating dosage refinement [188]. Future directions include co-delivery with chemotherapeutics (e.g., paclitaxel) to exploit curcumin’s chemosensitizing effects and hybrid systems integrating photothermal agents for multimodal therapy [185]. Clinical translation awaits rigorous toxicity profiling, though HA’s biocompatibility and curcumin’s safety up to 8 g/day in trials support feasibility [189].
In summary, HA-decorated liposomes harness CD44 overexpression in TNBC to deliver curcumin with precision, simultaneously eradicating bulk tumor cells and CSCs while mitigating metastasis. This paradigm exemplifies how nanotechnology transforms natural compounds into targeted oncotherapeutics.
Pancreatic cancer
The therapeutic landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is dominated by a dense desmoplastic stroma and a hypoxic, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) that severely limits drug penetration. While early polymeric formulations such as NanoCurc™ established the foundational feasibility of systemic curcumin delivery in preclinical models [190, 191], specifically extending median survival from 28 to 63 days in xenograft models, recent researches have pivoted toward “smart” multifunctional nanocarriers designed to actively breach these stromal barriers and reprogram the TME [192].
Recent advances focus on co-delivery systems that leverage synergistic interactions to disrupt the stromal matrix. For instance, a study developed RGD-peptide modified human serum albumin (HSA) nanoparticles for the co-delivery of gemcitabine and curcumin (RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR) [193]. This system demonstrated a 200% improvement in drug diffusion through the stroma compared to free drug combinations by downregulating fibrosis-associated proteins and inhibiting cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). By targeting integrin receptors, these nanoparticles not only facilitated deep tissue penetration but also suppressed MDR1 and BCL-2 expression, effectively sensitizing resistant PDAC cells to chemotherapy [194].
Furthermore, breakthroughs in 2024 have integrated biomimetic technology with nanozymes to address the hypoxic nature of PDAC. Li et al. engineered a metal-organic framework (MOF) nanosheet decorated with platinum nanozymes to deliver curcumin [195]. This platform functions as a catalase mimic, converting intratumoral hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) into oxygen (O2) to alleviate hypoxia, thereby amplifying the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT). Such “oxygen-generating” strategies represent a significant leap from passive carriers, actively modulating the metabolic TME to enhance curcumin-mediated cytotoxicity.
Beyond stromal and hypoxic barriers, recent investigations (2023–2025) have highlighted the capacity of curcumin nano-systems to reverse the “cold” immune microenvironment of PDAC. Novel mannose-modified liposomal formulations co-loading curcumin and immunoadjuvants have shown remarkable efficacy in repolarizing tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from the pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype to the anti-tumor M1 phenotype [196]. This repolarization restores the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-12) and recruits cytotoxic T lymphocytes into the tumor core, suggesting that curcumin nanomedicines can effectively synergize with immune checkpoint inhibitors to overcome PDAC immunosuppression.
In parallel, emerging gene-chemotherapy combinations address the genetic drivers of PDAC. Polyplex nanoparticles developed in 2019 co-delivering curcumin and siRNA targeting the KRAS oncogene (mutated in >90% of PDAC cases) have shown promise [197, 198]. These systems utilize curcumin not just as a cytotoxic agent, but as a bioactive carrier stabilizer that enhances endosomal escape, leading to simultaneous KRAS silencing and apoptosis induction [199, 200]. Collectively, these recent studies illustrate a paradigm shift from simple encapsulation to the engineering of TME-responsive, stroma-penetrating nanomedicines that unlock curcumin’s potential in refractory pancreatic cancer.
Glioblastoma
The therapeutic application of curcumin in glioblastoma (GBM) has been significantly limited by its poor bioavailability and solubility, as well as the restrictive blood-brain barrier (BBB) [201]. While early research established curcumin’s ability to modulate core oncogenic pathways—such as NF-κB, PI3K/Akt/mTOR, and STAT3—to suppress glioma proliferation [63], recent research has pivoted towards engineering nano-delivery systems designed to overcome these pharmacokinetic barriers and enhance efficacy.
Nanocarriers have proven effective in encapsulating curcumin without compromising its bioactivity, promoting its uptake by GBM cells, and enhancing its cytotoxic and pro-apoptotic effects [202]. For instance, curcumin-loaded niosomal nanoparticles demonstrated superior anti-tumor effects against glioblastoma stem-like cells (GSCs) compared to free curcumin in vitro, showing high encapsulation efficiency and sustained release [202]. Similarly, dendrosomal curcumin nanoformulation effectively inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis in U87MG glioblastoma cells by downregulating pluripotency genes via miR-145 activation [203]. Nanodisk (ND) systems, particularly when combined with ApoE, have also been shown to significantly enhance curcumin delivery and intracellular concentration in GBM cells [204].
The overarching strategy of these nano-systems is to achieve targeted delivery. Reviews highlight that nano-formulations such as nanoparticles, liposomes, and polymeric carriers can improve curcumin’s solubility, absorption, and penetration into GBM cells [205]. Mechanisms such as receptor-mediated transcytosis (RMT) allow functionalized nanocarriers to interact with endothelial cell surface receptors, thereby facilitating BBB traversal and subsequent drug release. Functionalizing nanoparticles with Tf ligands exploits this endogenous transport mechanism, significantly enhancing brain biodistribution. Preclinical studies demonstrate that Tf-conjugated nanocarriers—such as gold nanoparticles, PEGylated albumin nanoparticles, and porous silicon nanoparticles—achieve up to an 8-fold increase in brain curcumin concentrations compared to non-targeted formulations. Correspondingly, in vivo efficacy studies in U87MG xenografts revealed that these transferrin-conjugated systems could reduce tumor growth by approximately 45% compared to free curcumin controls, validating the relevance of targeted delivery [206, 207]. This targeted delivery was validated in in vitro BBB models, where Tf-nanoparticle uptake was concentration- and time-dependent, with specificity confirmed through competitive inhibition assays using free Tf antibodies.
Furthermore, innovative approaches like conjugating curcumin with antibodies (e.g., CD68) have been explored to direct the compound to tumor-associated microglia, showing anti-tumor activity in models [208]. Beyond pure therapeutic delivery, the concept of combining diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) is emerging. More advanced nano-strategies, including biomimetic systems, are part of the evolving research landscape aimed at improving BBB traversal and tumor accumulation [209]. Additionally, alternative delivery routes such as nose-to-brain administration are being investigated as non-invasive methods to bypass the BBB entirely, as suggested in reviews discussing future directions. Finally, the integration of curcumin nanoformulations with standard chemotherapy like temozolomide is a promising avenue to modulate multiple signaling pathways and enhance anti-cancer effects, as indicated by preclinical studies.
However, it is crucial to note that while numerous preclinical studies demonstrate efficacy, clinical trials specifically for curcumin-based nano-therapies in GBM remain scarce, highlighting a critical gap between laboratory research and clinical application [207].
Other cancers
Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles (LPNs) and other nanocarrier systems have demonstrated exceptional potential in enhancing the anticancer efficacy and bioavailability of curcumin across diverse carcinomas, particularly in lung, prostate, and hepatic cancers. These advanced delivery platforms address curcumin’s inherent limitations—poor solubility, rapid metabolism, and systemic instability—by improving tumor-specific accumulation and cellular uptake through passive targeting (EPR effect) and active ligand-mediated strategies.
In lung cancer, cationic lipid nanosystems significantly enhance curcumin’s anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects. For instance, curcumin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (Cur-SLNs) optimized for A549 cells exhibit superior cytotoxicity and cellular uptake compared to free curcumin, achieving >80% encapsulation efficiency (EE) and inducing 60–75% apoptosis [210]. Liposomal formulations like PlexoZome® further suppress migration, colony formation, and cancer-marker protein expression in vitro, while hybrid systems co-loaded with paclitaxel or triptolide amplify tumor inhibition through synergistic pathways [211]. Recent innovations include pH-sensitive, EGFR-targeted LPNs that co-deliver erlotinib and Bev, enhancing tumor targeting and overcoming chemoresistance in NSCLC models [212].
For prostate cancer, nanocarriers overcome docetaxel resistance in castration-resistant models. Curcumin nanoparticles (CUR NPs) formulated with Miglyol 812 and TPGS restore potency in DU145 and PC3-resistant cells by inhibiting P-gp efflux, with 90% EE and sustained cytotoxicity [213]. Aptamer-functionalized LPNs co-delivering curcumin and cabazitaxel further improve tumor targeting and anti-proliferative activity in PC3 cells [214]. Meta-analyses confirm dose-dependent tumor suppression in animal models, where high-dose nanocurcumin downregulates PCNA/MMP2 mRNA and upregulates pro-apoptotic Bax [215]. Additionally, antibody-conjugated formulations (e.g., CD44 or HER2-targeted NPs) enhance cellular internalization and biodistribution, extending plasma half-life by 5.3-fold in murine xenografts [216].
In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), multifunctional nanoplatforms leverage molecular self-assembly and peptide targeting. SP94 peptide-modified nanoparticles co-loaded with curcumin and resveratrol significantly improve drug retention, reduce required dosages, and delay release kinetics, achieving synergistic tumor growth inhibition without off-target toxicity [106]. Similarly, IRMOF-10-based carriers exhibit 63.96% drug loading, slow release profiles, and enhanced pro-apoptotic effects in HepG2 cells by elevating ROS and depolarizing mitochondrial membranes [217]. Co-delivery systems combining curcumin with doxorubicin or cisplatin within transformable peptide nanocarriers suppress metastasis and angiogenesis by modulating MMPs and VEGF pathways, validated in vivo through reduced tumor burden and improved histopathology [218].
Clinical and translational advances underscore the viability of these systems. Phase I/II trials of liposomal curcumin (e.g., SinaCurcumin®) in inflammation reveal accelerated symptom resolution and immunomodulatory effects, supporting repurposing for oncology. Ongoing studies explore folate-conjugated and EGFR-targeted LPNs to amplify radiosensitization in prostate and lung cancers [219]. However, challenges persist in scalable manufacturing, long-term toxicity profiling, and regulatory approval of multifunctional nanocarriers.
In summary, curcumin nanomedicines represent a paradigm shift in oncology therapeutics, merging enhanced bioavailability with mechanistically diverse antitumor actions. Future efforts should prioritize combinatorial regimens integrating nanotechnology with conventional therapies to maximize clinical outcomes (Tables 3).
Table 3.
Classification and characteristics of smart nanocarriers for curcumin delivery
| Nanocarrier type | Subtypes | Key features | Advantages | Representative applications | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polymeric nanoparticles | PLGA, chitosan, gelatin | Biodegradable, tunable release kinetics; surface functionalization possible | High encapsulation efficiency (up to 94%); prolonged circulation | Colorectal cancer (chitosan-gum arabic hybrids) | [101] |
| Lipid-based carriers | Liposomes, NLCs, exosomes | Biocompatible; enhanced lymphatic uptake; biomimetic properties | High bioavailability (11.93-fold vs. free curcumin); low immunogenicity | Triple-negative breast cancer (HA-decorated liposomes) | [108, 178–180] |
| Inorganic nanoparticles | MSNs, AuNPs | Porous structure (MSNs); photothermal properties (AuNPs) | High loading capacity; stimuli-responsive release | Cervical Cancer (Au-curcumin conjugates | [133] |
| Stimuli-responsive systems | pH-, redox-, enzyme-sensitive | Triggered release in tumor microenvironment (pH 5.5–6.8; high GSH/MMPs) | Spatiotemporal drug release; minimized off-target toxicity | Pancreatic cancer (MMP-responsive hydrogels) | [151] |
Synergistic mechanisms and combination therapies
Chemo-curcumin nano-delivery systems
Synergistic therapy utilizing nanoparticle co-delivery systems represents a pivotal advancement in enhancing curcumin’s anticancer efficacy by leveraging complementary mechanisms with conventional chemotherapeutics. This approach fundamentally addresses multiple limitations of traditional chemotherapy, including multidrug resistance (MDR), systemic toxicity, and inadequate tumor penetration [220]. The strategic co-encapsulation of curcumin with chemotherapeutic agents within nanocarriers creates multifunctional platforms that simultaneously overcome biological barriers while amplifying therapeutic outcomes through pharmacodynamic interactions.
Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles have emerged as particularly effective carriers due to their biocompatibility, controlled release properties, and adaptability for surface functionalization [221, 222]. In breast cancer models, doxorubicin-curcumin (CUR-DOX) nanoformulations demonstrate remarkable synergy by concurrently attacking cancer cells through multiple pathways. Specifically, Sarkar et al. reported that this combination treatment significantly induces S-phase cell cycle arrest in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) cells, achieving a 3-fold higher apoptosis rate compared to monotherapy, effectively halting proliferation in this aggressive subtype and demonstrating superior efficacy compared to monotherapies [223].
In the context of breast cancer MDR, recent investigations have elucidated that the synergistic potency of Curcumin and Doxorubicin (DOX) within polymeric nanocarriers (e.g., nanomicelles) extends beyond simple co-delivery [224]. To further refine this synergy, Zeng et al. developed a “Shell-Core” bilayer nanoparticle system as a co-delivery platform. This advanced architecture is engineered to render a synchronized response to the tumor microenvironment, thereby optimizing the spatiotemporal release of both drugs to maximize antitumor effects and overcome resistance [224]. Similarly, a 2023 study [225] demonstrated that nanomicelles co-encapsulating DOX and Curcumin could effectively reverse multidrug resistance in cancer cells by competitively inhibiting the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux pump [226]. The nanoformulation achieved high encapsulation efficiency and facilitated the nuclear accumulation of DOX, which is typically expelled in resistant cells [227]. Furthermore, recent advancements have introduced targeted co-assembly micelles that exhibit synergistic cytotoxicity. These systems not only enhanced the intracellular retention of DOX compared to free drug combinations but also utilized Curcumin to modulate apoptotic signaling pathways, thereby significantly improving anti-tumor efficacy against resistant breast cancer cell lines. Advanced formulations incorporating photoresponsive elements, such as perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB) in PLGA nanoparticles, enable laser-triggered drug release that further enhances intracellular doxorubicin accumulation by 76–84% [228], significantly suppressing tumor proliferation and migration through reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and caspase-3 activation. Targeted delivery systems like transferrin-conjugated nanoparticles demonstrate superior biodistribution, with recent evidence showing 40% greater tumor accumulation than non-targeted versions, substantially improving survival outcomes in xenograft models [229].
For pancreatic cancer, the co-delivery of gemcitabine and curcumin (GEM-CUR) in albumin-based nanoparticles addresses the critical challenge of stromal barrier penetration. The 2022 RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR nanoparticle system demonstrates a 200% improvement in drug diffusion through tumor stroma compared to free drug combinations [193]. This enhanced penetration translates to significant in vivo efficacy, with RGD-modified nanoparticles reducing tumor volumes to 354.6 mm³, representing a 55% reduction compared to the free drug group (781.4 mm³) and a 71% reduction compared to the saline control group after 27 days treatment, attributed to curcumin’s ability to downregulate fibrosis-associated proteins and inhibit cancer-associated fibroblasts. The targeted formulation simultaneously suppresses MDR1 and BCL-2 expression at mRNA levels, overcoming inherent chemoresistance while maintaining negligible systemic toxicity as evidenced by stable murine body weights throughout treatment [230].
Beyond direct cytotoxicity, emerging research highlights curcumin’s immunomodulatory synergy with checkpoint inhibitors. Nanodelivery systems enhance curcumin’s bioavailability sufficiently to inhibit STAT3 signaling in dendritic cells, thereby augmenting anti-PD-1 therapy by reducing regulatory T-cell infiltration and restoring CD8 + T-cell functionality [231, 232]. This immunotherapeutic combination demonstrates particular promise in resistant malignancies where conventional immunotherapy fails, though clinical validation remains ongoing. Similarly, innovative photothermal-curcumin hybrid systems like gold-nanorod vesicles enable sequential drug release under near-infrared irradiation, achieving synergistic cell cycle arrest (S-phase) and apoptosis induction unattainable with single-modality approaches [233].
Despite these advances, clinical translation requires optimization of drug loading capacities (currently averaging <10% w/w in polymeric systems), refinement of tumor-specific targeting ligands, and comprehensive toxicological profiling [222]. Future developments should focus on multifunctional “smart” nanoparticles responsive to tumor microenvironmental cues (pH, enzymes, redox gradients) to achieve spatiotemporal control over drug release [234]. The integration of stromal-modulating agents alongside cytotoxic combinations presents a promising frontier for overcoming physical barriers in desmoplastic tumors [230].
Collectively, these nano-enabled combination strategies transform curcumin from a pharmacologically challenged compound into a potent cornerstone of modern cancer therapy regimens. By simultaneously addressing bioavailability limitations, tumor microenvironment barriers, and multidrug resistance while amplifying therapeutic synergy, engineered co-delivery systems significantly expand the clinical potential of curcumin-based anticancer interventions.
Immunotherapy combinations
The integration of curcumin (CUR) with immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly anti-PD-1 antibodies, represents a cutting-edge strategy in cancer immunotherapy by synergistically remodeling the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Curcumin exerts multifaceted immunomodulatory effects, including inhibition of the STAT3 signaling pathway, which is frequently hyperactivated in tumors and contributes to dendritic cell (DC) dysfunction and T-cell exhaustion. By targeting STAT3, CUR restores DC-mediated antigen presentation and enhances the priming of tumor antigen-specific CD8 + T cells, thereby augmenting the efficacy of PD-1 blockade [231]. In preclinical studies using the 4T1 murine breast cancer model, the combination of CUR and anti-PD-1 therapy significantly increased intratumoral CD8 + T-cell infiltration by 50% while concurrently reducing regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), which collectively dismantle immunosuppressive barriers and potentiate cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) activity [235, 236]. This immunogenic shift is further amplified by CUR’s ability to repolarize tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) from the pro-tumor M2 phenotype to the antitumor M1 phenotype and to suppress immunosuppressive cytokines like IL-10, TGF-β, and VEGF [237].
Despite its potent immunomodulatory properties, curcumin’s clinical translation has been hindered by poor aqueous solubility, rapid systemic metabolism, and low oral bioavailability (<1%). To overcome these limitations, smart nanoparticle delivery systems have been engineered to enhance CUR’s pharmacokinetics and tumor-targeted delivery. Liposomal formulations, for instance, encapsulate CUR within biocompatible phospholipid bilayers, shielding it from degradation and improving cellular uptake. Moreover, specific protein-based nanocarriers like heavy chain ferritin (HFn) nanocages (Cur@HFn) have demonstrated precise pH-triggered disassembly. These systems exhibit a 3-fold faster drug release rate at endosomal pH (5.0–6.0) compared to physiological pH, and have achieved approximately 50% tumor regression in breast cancer models by ensuring high intracellular drug concentration [238]. Surface modification with polyethylene glycol (PEG) extends circulation half-life, while functionalization with ligands (e.g., glycoproteins or antibodies) enables active targeting to tumor cells or immune cells within the TME [11]. Similarly, polymeric nanoparticles (e.g., PLGA-based carriers) and micellar systems (e.g., Pluronic/PCL copolymers) achieve high drug-loading capacities and sustained release, significantly boosting CUR concentrations in tumor tissues [239]. In the 4T1 model, nanoformulations like Gemini-CUR—a lipid-polymeric hybrid nanoparticle—demonstrated enhanced tumor accumulation and potentiated apoptosis through downregulation of MMP-9, VEGF, and Bcl-2, providing a robust platform for combination immunotherapy [240, 241].
Emerging clinical evidence supports the feasibility of CUR-based nanomedicines in augmenting immunotherapy. A pilot trial combining oral nanocurcumin with pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in cervical and uterine cancer patients reported improved therapeutic responses and reduced immunosuppressive factors, suggesting gut microbiota modulation as a potential mechanism [242]. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating nano-CUR formulations (e.g., liposomal CUR and micellar CUR) across diverse cancers, with several in Phase I/II. However, challenges persist, including batch-to-batch variability in nanocarrier synthesis, long-term biosafety concerns, and the need for optimized dosing regimens in combinatorial protocols [243]. Future directions include developing stimuli-responsive nanocarriers that release CUR in response to TME-specific cues (e.g., pH or enzymes) and hybrid nanoparticles co-delivering CUR with other immunomodulators (e.g., TLR agonists) to further amplify antitumor immunity [244].
In summary, CUR nanoparticle delivery systems not only resolve bioavailability limitations but also strategically reprogram the TME to overcome resistance to PD-1 blockade. As clinical trials advance, these targeted nanoplatforms hold transformative potential for enhancing the precision and efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.
Theranostic applications
The integration of iron oxide-curcumin hybrid nanoparticles represents a transformative advancement in theranostic oncology, leveraging multimodal imaging capabilities to achieve real-time tumor tracking and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. These nanoconstructs, synthesized via green co-precipitation or metal-chelated methods [245], exploit curcumin’s inherent bioactivity while incorporating superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast. The resulting hybrids exhibit synergistic functionalities: SPIONs provide high T₂-weighted MRI contrast for anatomical localization [246], while curcumin-derived fluorescence enables cellular-level visualization [247, 248]. In CT26 colorectal carcinoma models, such dual-labeled nanoparticles achieved 60% tumor suppression through mechanisms involving pH-responsive drug release and oxidative stress amplification [249]. This suppression is attributed to curcumin’s modulation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways and iron-mediated Fenton reactions, which collectively induce apoptosis and inhibit metastasis [250].
Recent innovations in surface engineering have further optimized tumor targeting and biocompatibility. Functionalization with polyethylene glycol (PEG) or tumor-homing peptides (e.g., RGD) extends systemic circulation while facilitating active accumulation in neoplastic tissues via enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effects [251]. A study demonstrated that copper silicate nanoparticles co-loaded with curcumin could deplete intratumoral glutathione and alleviate hypoxia, thereby amplifying photodynamic-chemodynamic synergy and achieving 80% growth inhibition in CT26 models [252]. Such combinatorial approaches address the tumor microenvironment’s immunosuppressive nature, as evidenced by macrophage repolarization toward antitumor M1 phenotypes [253].
Beyond monotherapy, these platforms enable precision-guided synergistic regimens. MRI-fluorescence navigation permits spatially controlled hyperthermia or radiotherapy, where localized heating from alternating magnetic fields triggers curcumin release while sensitizing cancer cells to ionizing radiation [254, 255]. The 2023 DEGRO trial highlighted zinc oxide-curcumin hybrids enhancing radiotherapeutic efficacy through ROS potentiation and DNA damage amplification [256]. Moreover, carrier-free nanodrug assemblies (e.g., curcumin-siRNA conjugates) exploit endogenous biomolecules for self-delivery, bypassing traditional nanocarrier limitations [257].
Crucially, nanoparticle encapsulation overcomes curcumin’s pharmacokinetic barriers: poor aqueous solubility, rapid glucuronidation, and systemic clearance. Lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles (e.g., alginate/chitosan-coated SPIONs) enhance oral bioavailability by approximately 20-fold in rodent models via lymphatic uptake and enzymatic degradation shielding [258, 259]. The 2024 glucose oxidase-Fe₃O₄ system exemplifies metabolic modulation, where cascadic ROS generation from glucose depletion and curcumin release induces immunogenic cell death [250]. Future directions include CRISPR-Cas9 co-delivery for gene-editing-enhanced therapy and clinical translation of GMP-compliant nanoformulations [257].
Collectively, iron oxide-curcumin theranostics epitomize next-generation oncology tools, merging diagnosis, targeted delivery, and multimodal treatment within a unified platform. Their efficacy in aggressive models like CT26 colorectal cancer underscores potential clinical relevance, pending large-scale biocompatibility studies and Phase I trials [260].
Clinical translation: from early failures to emerging successes
The clinical translation of smart nanoparticle delivery systems for curcumin has evolved significantly over the past 5 years. While early phase I studies (e.g., the 2018 Lipocurc™ trial) [261] primarily identified dose-limiting toxicities and pharmacokinetic instability [236], recent investigations have shifted focus toward combinatorial regimens and biomarker-driven stratification, revealing more robust efficacy signals.
Safety, pharmacokinetics, and formulation constraints
Recent advancements have successfully addressed the historical challenge of negligible oral bioavailability. A pivotal 2023 crossover study demonstrated that a novel solvent-free co-grinding nanostrategy (CUMINUP60®) achieved a 178-fold increase in plasma Area Under the Curve (AUC) in healthy human volunteers compared to standard crystalline curcumin [79]. Unlike earlier formulations that precipitated rapidly, this strategy utilized water-soluble carriers to maintain supersaturation, significantly extending the absorption window without adverse events. Similarly, comparative pharmacokinetic evaluations in 2024 confirmed that optimized solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) and amphiphilic polymer assessments could extend the systemic circulation half-life from minutes to hours, effectively shielding the labile β-diketone moiety from hydrolytic degradation. Regarding safety profile updates, clinical data from nanomicellar formulations have demonstrated superior tolerability compared to the hemolytic risks observed in earlier liposomal infusions [24]. In a randomized trial involving COVID-19 patients (2021), nanomicellar curcumin (Sinacurcumin®) administered at 80 mg/day for 14 days showed no hepato-renal toxicity, with patients exhibiting stable serum creatinine and liver enzyme levels, thereby establishing a safety baseline for sustained oral dosing in inflammatory conditions [262]. However, formulation constraints persist in the realm of long-term biocompatibility. 2023–2024 toxicological reviews highlight that while acute toxicity is manageable, the chronic accumulation of non-biodegradable carriers (e.g., certain metallic or high-molecular-weight polymeric components) in the reticuloendothelial system remains a concern [10]. Furthermore, achieving consistent drug loading remains a bottleneck; recent comparisons indicate that while polymeric micelles offer high stability, they often suffer from low drug loading capacities (<10%), necessitating large carrier volumes to achieve therapeutic doses in oncology, which complicates patient compliance and industrial scalability.
Efficacy endpoints and clinical outcomes
Despite these constraints, preliminary efficacy signals have been observed. In the Lipocurc™ trial, while no objective response rate (ORR) was observed per RECIST v1.1, two heavily pretreated patients (one with prostate carcinoma and another with colon carcinoma) exhibited significant tumor marker reductions and transient clinical benefit, suggesting potential biological activity in select subpopulations. More encouraging efficacy data were derived from combinatorial regimens. Early-phase trials such as the CUFOX IIa and G-NLC + FOLFIRI studies have shown positive outcomes, including improved overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.339) and progression-free survival (PFS) (12.8 months) [172]. Regarding NanoCurc™, although it demonstrates robust preclinical promise by enhancing blood-brain barrier penetration in glioblastoma models [263], its clinical evaluation has often targeted non-oncological endpoints. For instance, ongoing studies (e.g., NCT04853199) prioritize inflammatory biomarkers in breast cancer over antitumor efficacy [264]. Consequently, the clinical translation of curcumin nanoformulations remains at an early stage, with findings derived from small, often non-randomized studies that require validation in larger, controlled trials [265].
Limitations of current clinical evidence
Current clinical findings, while promising, are constrained by inherent limitations in trial design and evidence quality.
Sample size and study design
Most efficacy data are derived from Phase I/II trials with small cohorts (e.g., N = 28 in CUFOX, N = 44 in G-NLC trials). The lack of large-scale, randomized, multicenter Phase III trials limits the statistical power to confirm survival benefits (OS) definitively.
Patient heterogeneity
Early-phase trials often enroll heavily pretreated patients with refractory disease, which may obscure the true efficacy of nanoformulations due to compromised immune systems or multidrug resistance. Future trials require better patient stratification based on biomarkers (e.g., FRα or CD44 expression) to identify responders.
Endpoint interpretation
Many studies rely on surrogate endpoints like Progression-Free Survival (PFS) or tumor marker reduction. While valuable, these do not always translate to long-term Overall Survival (OS) benefits, necessitating longer follow-up periods.
However, resolving these clinical trial limitations is only half the battle. Even if efficacy is proven, the widespread adoption of these nanomedicines is currently bottlenecked by upstream industrial challenges, specifically the difficulty of manufacturing these complex systems at a commercial scale (Table 4).
Table 4.
Selected clinical trials of curcumin nanoformulations in cancer therapy
| Trial name/ID | Formulation | Indication | Phase (N) | Key results & clinical outcomes | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lipocurc™(NCT02138995) | Liposomal Curcumin | Advanced Solid Tumors | Phase I (N = 32) | Safety: MTD established at 300 mg/m² (6 h infusion). Efficacy: No objective response; stable disease in some patients. | [261] |
| CUFOX(NCT01490996) | Curcumin C3-Complex | Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | Phase IIa (N = 28) | Survival: Adding curcumin to FOLFOX improved OS (HR 0.34) and PFS. Tolerability: Safe and well-tolerated. | [172] |
| G-NLC(NCT02439385) | Nanostructured Lipid Carrier | Metastatic Colorectal Cancer | Phase II (N = 44) | Efficacy: Median PFS 12.8 mo; Median OS 30.7 mo. Outcome: Significant improvement in disease control rate (DCR). | [171] |
| PRIMMO(NCT03192059) | Nanocurcumin (Oral) | Cervical & Endometrial Cancer | Phase II (N = 43) | Outcome: Did not meet primary endpoint for ORR. Observation: Modest immune modulation observed; good safety profile. | [242] |
Barriers to translation: the “bench-to-bedside” gap
The clinical translation of smart nanoparticle delivery systems for curcumin faces substantial challenges in scalability and manufacturing, with batch variability and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) compliance representing critical hurdles. PLGA nanoparticles (NPs), a widely studied carrier for curcumin, exhibit significant inter-batch heterogeneity in encapsulation efficiency (EE), with reported fluctuations ranging from 21% to 94% [266]. This inconsistency primarily stems from subtle variations in solvent selection, stabilizer concentrations (e.g., PVA, vitamin E-TPGS), emulsification methods (single vs. double emulsion), and even operator technique, as demonstrated by studies showing trained individuals producing NPs with average diameters varying between 220 nm and 364 nm despite identical protocols [267]. Such variability directly impacts critical quality attributes (CQAs) like particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), zeta potential, and drug loading [268], ultimately compromising the reproducibility of pharmacokinetic profiles and therapeutic efficacy in vivo. For instance, ζ-potential measurements across different PLGA NP formulations can range from −31.1 mV to +3.71 mV [269], influencing colloidal stability and biodistribution, while PDI values from 0.192 to 0.542 indicate broad size distributions that affect tumor penetration and clearance rates. Ensuring batch-to-batch consistency necessitates rigorous process control, including meticulous characterization of each batch and strategic pooling strategies to homogenize critical parameters before further modification or administration [270].
The stringent requirements of GMP compliance introduce another layer of complexity and cost to nanoscale manufacturing. Establishing and maintaining the specialized infrastructure, cleanroom facilities, and analytical instrumentation required for reproducible, large-scale production under GMP conditions represents a significant financial barrier, with initial investments potentially reaching $5 million [271]. This high cost is compounded by the inherent complexity of nanomedicine manufacturing, which involves multiple unit operations (emulsification, purification, sterilization, lyophilization) and demands exquisite control over numerous critical process parameters (CPPs) to ensure consistent CQAs [272]. Even minor deviations in parameters like mixing intensity, solvent evaporation rate, or temperature during scale-up can drastically alter NP properties (size, EE, release kinetics) and, consequently, their biological fate and safety profile [273]. Furthermore, sterilization of thermolabile nanocarriers like liposomes or certain polymeric NPs without compromising stability remains a persistent challenge, often requiring expensive aseptic processing techniques instead of terminal heat sterilization [274, 275]. The analytical burden is also heightened, requiring multiple orthogonal characterization techniques (DLS, TEM, HPLC, etc.) for comprehensive batch release testing due to the multifaceted nature of NPs.
Addressing these scalability and manufacturing hurdles requires innovative engineering solutions and advanced process control strategies. Microfluidic technology has emerged as a promising approach to enhance batch consistency. Compared to traditional bulk nanoprecipitation, microfluidic platforms enable superior control over mixing dynamics, shear forces, and supersaturation levels, facilitating the production of NPs with significantly narrower size distributions (PDI < 0.15) and improved reproducibility [276]. For example, optimized microfluidic systems can generate homogeneous PLGA NPs (~150 nm) with high reproducibility, and surface modifications (e.g., with cell-penetrating peptides) can be performed predictably [277]. Scaling microfluidic production is achievable through strategies like parallelization of microchannels, flow rate optimization, and device engineering, with recent reports demonstrating production rates exceeding 1300 mg/h of PLGA NPs [278]. Continuous manufacturing platforms, integrating inline ultrasonication [279] or static mixers [280] with downstream purification like tangential flow filtration (TFF), offer advantages in process control, reduced footprint, and easier scale-up compared to batch processes, aligning better with GMP requirements [272]. TFF, in particular, has proven effective in removing residual solvents and concentrating NPs while maintaining critical attributes like size and PDI [281]. Implementing a Quality by Design (QbD) framework is crucial for robust manufacturing. QbD involves proactively defining the target product profile, identifying CQAs (e.g., size, EE, drug release), understanding the impact of material attributes and CPPs through risk assessment and design of experiments (DoE), and establishing a design space to ensure consistent quality [282]. This systematic approach, applied to processes like wet media milling or high-pressure homogenization, enhances process understanding, reduces batch failures, and facilitates regulatory approval [283].
Finally, exploring novel carrier materials and formulations with inherently improved stability profiles can mitigate manufacturing challenges. Hybrid lipid-polymer nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) offer enhanced stability and drug loading capacities compared to some pure polymeric systems [284]. Advances in stabilizer chemistry, such as optimized PEGylation or alternative stealth coatings, contribute to colloidal stability during manufacturing and storage [285]. Furthermore, optimizing formulations for specific storage conditions (e.g., lyophilization with suitable cryoprotectants for long-term stability) is essential for product shelf-life and distribution logistics [275]. Overcoming the intertwined challenges of batch variability and GMP compliance demands a multidisciplinary approach, combining advanced manufacturing technologies (microfluidics, continuous processing), rigorous quality management systems (QbD), and innovative material science to pave the way for the successful clinical translation of efficacious curcumin nanotherapies.
Regulatory and safety considerations
The clinical translation of smart nanoparticle delivery systems for curcumin faces significant regulatory and safety hurdles, particularly concerning immunogenicity and long-term toxicity, which must be comprehensively addressed to ensure therapeutic efficacy and patient safety. Immunogenicity remains a critical challenge, as polyethylene glycol (PEG)-coated nanoparticles—commonly used to enhance circulation time—can provoke anti-PEG immune responses. Recent studies indicate that approximately 40% of patients develop anti-PEG antibodies after exposure to PEGylated nanocarriers, with pre-existing antibodies detected in 25–44% of healthy individuals due to widespread environmental exposure to PEG in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, and processed foods [286]. These antibodies, predominantly IgM and IgG, trigger accelerated blood clearance (ABC) of subsequent doses, reduce bioavailability, and may cause hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis [287]. For instance, mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines boosted anti-PEG IgM by 68.5-fold and IgG by 13.1-fold in clinical trials, correlating with increased hypersensitivity incidents [288]. This immunogenicity compromises curcumin delivery by reducing tumor accumulation and undermining dose-dependent anticancer effects [288, 289].
Long-term toxicity concerns center on nanoparticle accumulation in the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS), particularly the liver and spleen, where reticuloendothelial clearance leads to persistent retention. Preclinical studies show that intravenously administered curcumin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) accumulate >50% in the liver and spleen within 24 h, with residual fluorescence detectable for weeks [290, 291]. Such accumulation risks hepatosplenic inflammation, oxidative stress, and granuloma formation, yet chronic toxicity data beyond 6 months remain scarce [292]. This gap stems from methodological limitations: conventional cell cultures cannot sustain long-term exposure assessments, while animal models inadequately predict human immune responses or organ-specific damage [293]. For example, repeated dosing in rats revealed dose-dependent inflammation in hepatic Kupffer cells, but translatability to humans is uncertain due to interspecies variations in MPS activity [294]. Without robust chronic toxicity profiles, regulatory approval is hindered, as agencies like the FDA and EMA require comprehensive biodistribution and safety data extending to at least 12 months for nanomedicines [295].
Regulatory frameworks struggle to standardize safety evaluations, as nanomedicines’ complexity—variable size, surface charge, and degradation kinetics—complicates characterization and risk assessment. The FDA’s 2022 guidance emphasizes rigorous immunotoxicity screening and organ-specific biodistribution studies, while the EMA mandates comparative benefit-risk analyses for nanosimilars [296]. However, neither agency provides definitive protocols for chronic toxicity testing, reflecting broader inconsistencies in global regulations. Japan’s PMDA and India’s 2019 guidelines lack nanomaterial-specific thresholds, and regulatory divergence often classifies similar products as drugs or devices, impeding harmonized safety standards [297, 298]. Novel assessment strategies are emerging, such as adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) integrating in silico modeling and 3D microfluidic organ chips to simulate long-term liver-spleen interactions [299, 300]. Additionally, the REFINE project’s bio-physiokinetic models aim to predict nanoparticle accumulation, though clinical validation is ongoing.
To mitigate these challenges, “safe-by-design” approaches advocate for PEG alternatives, such as poly(glycerol) or zwitterionic polymers, which show reduced immunogenicity in early trials [301]. Concurrently, improved toxicity monitoring via quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models and multi-omics profiling could address long-term risks [302]. Regulatory alignment through initiatives like the Nanomedicine Characterization Laboratory (NCL) may further standardize requirements, accelerating translation while ensuring safety.
Future perspectives
Emerging technologies
The future of smart nanoparticle delivery systems for curcumin (CUR) hinges on the integration of cutting-edge technologies that synergistically enhance anticancer efficacy and bioavailability. Among the most transformative advancements is the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in nanoparticle design, which transcends traditional empirical approaches. AI-driven algorithms, particularly machine learning (ML) models, analyze vast datasets on polymer-drug interactions, physicochemical properties, and formulation parameters to predict and optimize encapsulation efficiency (EE). For instance, ML techniques such as Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Gaussian Processes have demonstrated the capability to elevate EE in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles beyond 90%, a significant improvement over conventional methods that typically achieve ~70% EE [303]. This optimization stems from AI’s ability to identify critical factors like PLGA molecular weight, lactide-to-glycolide ratio, and surfactant concentration, thereby streamlining nanocarrier development while minimizing trial-and-error experimentation [304]. Furthermore, AI facilitates the design of nanocarriers with tailored size, surface charge, and drug-release kinetics, which are crucial for improving tumor targeting and cellular uptake [305]. The integration of AI with microfluidic chip technology further refines nanoparticle fabrication, enabling precise control over parameters such as flow rates and reagent concentrations to enhance batch consistency and scalability.
Concurrently, CRISPR-Cas9 co-delivery systems represent a paradigm shift in precision oncology. Nanoparticles co-loaded with CUR and single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) can simultaneously deliver chemotherapeutic and gene-editing payloads to disrupt oncogenic pathways. For example, sgRNAs targeting the KRAS oncogene—a driver mutation in >90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs)—can be encapsulated alongside CUR in polymeric or lipid-based nanovehicles [306]. Upon cellular internalization, the CRISPR-Cas9 machinery induces double-stranded breaks in KRAS, silencing its expression and synergizing with CUR’s pro-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects [307]. This combinatorial approach not only amplifies tumor cell death but also mitigates drug resistance, as evidenced by studies where peptide-based nanoparticles delivered KRAS-targeting siRNA to desmoplastic pancreatic tumors, suppressing cancer progression in vivo [308]. The precision of this strategy is enhanced by ligand-functionalized nanoparticles (e.g., CCK-B receptor-targeted systems) that navigate the dense tumor microenvironment, ensuring selective delivery to malignant cells while sparing healthy tissues.
Looking ahead, the convergence of AI-optimized nanoparticles and CRISPR-Cas9 co-delivery promises a new frontier in personalized cancer therapy. AI can predict optimal sgRNA sequences to minimize off-target effects and design nanocarriers for co-encapsulating CUR and CRISPR components with high efficiency [309]. Emerging platforms, such as gold nanoparticles or bioreducible lipid nanoparticles, further enhance this synergy by facilitating endosomal escape and intracellular release of Cas9-sgRNA ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) [310]. However, challenges persist, including ensuring the biocompatibility and long-term safety of nanomaterials, addressing potential immune responses to CRISPR components, and validating these systems in large-scale clinical trials [311]. Regulatory frameworks for AI-driven nanomedicine and CRISPR-based therapies also require refinement to accelerate translational applications. Despite these hurdles, the fusion of AI and gene editing within nanodelivery systems heralds a transformative era for CUR-based oncology, offering hope for malignancies with limited treatment options, such as PDAC (Tables 5).
Table 5.
Preclinical efficacy and mechanisms of curcumin nanocarriers in specific cancer models
| Cancer type | Nanocarrier formulation | Study design & dose/regimen | Key quantifiable efficacy | Molecular mechanism/targeting strategy | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorectal cancer | MPEG-PCL Micelles | In vivo (C26 Xenograft) Dose: 25 mg/kg, IV | 50% reduction in tumor volume in C26 murine colon carcinoma xenografts (p < 0.05). | Passive Targeting: High encapsulation efficiency (99%) utilizes EPR effect. | [167] |
| HA-grafted PLGA Micelles | In vitro (HCT-116 cells) Conc: 10–50 µM | Significantly higher cytotoxicity in HCT-116 cells compared to non-targeted controls (p < 0.05). | Active Targeting: CD44-mediated endocytosis exploits receptor overexpression. | [161] | |
| Breast cancer (TNBC) | HA-decorated Liposomes | In vivo (Lung Metastasis) Route: IV administration | 70% suppression of pulmonary metastasis in 4T1 tumor-bearing mice (p < 0.01). | Anti-Metastasis: Inhibition of CSC self-renewal and CD44 receptor binding. | [181] |
| HA-decorated Liposomes | In vivo (MDA-MB-231) Route: IV administration | 3.3-fold higher tumor drug accumulation vs. free drug (p < 0.05). | Biodistribution: Enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) plus active targeting. | [178–180] | |
| Breast cancer | CUR-DOX PLGA NPs | In vivo (MDA-MB-231) Conc: ~20 µg/mL (Combined) | 3-fold higher apoptosis rate vs. monotherapy in MCF-7 cells (p < 0.05). | Synergy: Reversal of MDR via NF-κB/P-gp inhibition. | [223] |
| Pancreatic cancer | Gemcitabine-Curcumin NPs | In vivo (Orthotopic)Regimen: Co-delivery | 71% reduction in tumor volume in orthotopic models (p < 0.01). | Stromal Modulation: Disruption of hyaluronan/collagen barriers. | [193] |
| NanoCurc™ (Polymeric) | In vivo (Pan02 Xenograft) Dose: 25 mg/kg, IP daily | Extended median survival from 28 to 63 days in xenograft models (p < 0.001). | Immunomodulation: Enhanced bioavailability; Reduced oxidative stress. | [190, 191] | |
| Glioblastoma | Transferrin-conjugated NPs | In vivo (BBB Model) Route: IV administration | Up to an 8-fold increase in brain curcumin concentration (p < 0.05). | BBB Crossing: TfR-mediated transcytosis. | [206, 207] |
| Transferrin-conjugated NPs | In vivo (U87MG Xenograft) Route: IV administration | 45% reduction in tumor growth compared to free curcumin (p < 0.05). | Signaling Inhibition: Disruption of AKT/mTOR signaling; Induction of apoptosis. | [206, 207] | |
| Lung cancer | Curcumin-loaded SLNs | In vitro (A549 cells) Conc: 5–40 µM | 60–75% apoptosis in A549 cells observed in vitro (p < 0.001). | Cellular Uptake: Enhanced uptake and sustained release profile. | [210] |
| Prostate cancer | NLCs (Nanostructured Lipid Carriers) | In vivo (Xenograft) Route: Intratumoral/IV | Reduced tumor volume by 40% through enhanced cellular uptake. | Apoptosis Induction: Sustained release and enhanced cellular uptake. | [111] |
Personalized nanomedicine
The future of personalized nanomedicine in curcumin delivery represents a paradigm shift toward precision oncology, where genomic profiling serves as the cornerstone for ligand selection in nanoparticle design. By analyzing tumor-specific receptor expression patterns through multi-omics approaches (e.g., transcriptomics, proteomics), clinicians can identify optimal targeting ligands—such as folate for FRα-overexpressing tumors or transferrin for TfR-dominant malignancies—thereby maximizing tumor-specific uptake while minimizing off-target effects [312]. For instance, FRα is overexpressed in >80% of ovarian carcinomas and 30–50% of non-small cell lung cancers, whereas TfR shows significant upregulation in glioblastoma and metastatic tumors [313, 314]. This biomarker-driven strategy leverages advanced ligand screening technologies, including phage display and SELEX, to identify high-affinity aptamers or peptides that bind cognate receptors with nanomolar specificity [315].
Recent clinical advances underscore the translational potential of this approach. Phase I/II trials of biomarker-stratified nanotherapeutics—such as folate-targeted liposomal doxorubicin in FRα+ solid tumors and TfR-directed nanoparticles for glioblastoma—demonstrate enhanced therapeutic indices and reduced systemic toxicity compared to untargeted systems [316]. Notably, the INFORM2 NivEnt trial exemplifies how molecular profiling (e.g., WES, RNA-seq) guides patient stratification for targeted nanotherapy, achieving objective responses in 85% of biomarker-selected cohorts [317]. For curcumin specifically, genomic analysis of tumor redox environments (e.g., Nrf2/KEAP1 mutations) could inform the design of stimuli-responsive nanocarriers that release curcumin upon encountering tumor-specific oxidative stress, thereby exploiting molecular heterogeneity to boost anticancer efficacy.
Artificial intelligence further revolutionizes ligand-receptor matching through deep learning models that predict binding affinities and tumor homing efficiency. Multi-omics integration algorithms—trained on TCGA data and patient-derived organoids—can simulate curcumin pharmacokinetics in virtual patient cohorts, identifying optimal ligand-receptor pairs (e.g., folate vs. transferrin) based on individual tumor receptor stoichiometry [318]. For example, Hass et al. demonstrated that AI-driven models incorporating receptor dimerization patterns predicted ligand-dependent proliferation with 92% accuracy across breast and colorectal cancers [319]. Such computational frameworks, when coupled with real-time biosensor feedback from theranostic nanoparticles, could dynamically adjust ligand density or composition during treatment [320, 321], creating adaptive “smart” systems that evolve with the tumor’s molecular landscape.
Despite these advances, clinical implementation faces hurdles. Tumor receptor heterogeneity necessitates multi-ligand nanoparticles capable of targeting co-expressed biomarkers (e.g., FRα + EGFR), while endosomal escape barriers limit cytoplasmic curcumin delivery even after receptor-mediated uptake [322, 323]. Emerging solutions include “AND-gate” nanoparticles responsive to dual biomarkers and endosomolytic polymers that disrupt endosomal membranes upon pH activation. Moreover, scalable manufacturing of patient-specific nanocarriers requires standardized quality control protocols for ligand conjugation efficiency and batch-to-batch reproducibility—challenges being addressed through microfluidic production platforms. As biomarker validation trials (e.g., NANO-GBM) mature, the convergence of genomic profiling, AI-driven design, and modular nanocarrier systems promises to transform curcumin from a pleiotropic natural compound into a precision weapon against molecularly defined cancers [324, 325].
Sustainability and cost-effectiveness
The pursuit of sustainable and cost-effective strategies is paramount for the clinical translation of curcumin-loaded nanoparticle delivery systems. Plant-derived exosomes (PDEs), particularly those sourced from turmeric, represent a revolutionary approach to minimizing production costs while leveraging biocompatible nanocarriers. PDEs are natural extracellular vesicles that circumvent the need for complex synthetic processes, utilizing inherent biological machinery for nanoparticle formation [326]. Recent studies indicate that turmeric exosomes can reduce synthesis costs by approximately 70% compared to conventional liposomal or polymeric nanoparticles, primarily by eliminating expensive raw materials and energy-intensive manufacturing steps [327]. Beyond economic advantages, PDEs enhance drug stability and targeting specificity. Their lipid-protein architecture facilitates membrane fusion with cancer cells, improving curcumin’s intracellular delivery while reducing off-target toxicity [328]. However, challenges persist in standardizing isolation methods (e.g., ultracentrifugation, immunoaffinity) and scaling production without compromising vesicle integrity [329].
Complementary to PDEs, solvent-free green synthesis methods have emerged as a cornerstone for sustainable curcumin encapsulation. These approaches minimize environmental hazards by avoiding toxic organic solvents, instead employing mechanisms like anti-solvent precipitation or mechanochemical reactions to form curcumin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles (CUR-PLGA NPs) [330]. Recent optimizations have achieved encapsulation efficiencies (EE) exceeding 88%, attributed to precise control over polymer-drug interactions during nanoparticle self-assembly [331]. The absence of solvents not only reduces waste but also enhances process safety and scalability. For instance, boron-assisted imine formation in solvent-free systems enables high-yield curcuminoid synthesis with minimal purification steps, underscoring the method’s industrial viability [332]. Moreover, green-synthesized CUR-PLGA NPs demonstrate superior bioavailability; their sustained release profiles in intestinal environments enhance curcumin absorption by 5.6-fold compared to free curcumin, while PLGA’s biodegradability ensures systemic clearance without residual toxicity [333].
The environmental and economic benefits of these strategies are quantifiable through life-cycle assessments (LCAs). Solvent-free synthesis reduces energy consumption by 40–60% and cuts aquatic ecotoxicity impacts by 2–3 orders of magnitude relative to solvent-based methods [334]. For PDE production, economies of scale further diminish costs, as large-scale exosome harvesting leverages agricultural byproducts (e.g., turmeric waste), aligning with circular economy principles [335, 336]. Nevertheless, regulatory hurdles and standardization gaps—such as undefined quality controls for PDE cargo or PLGA degradation kinetics—require resolution to ensure commercial feasibility. Future frameworks must integrate Safe-by-Design (SbD) paradigms, combining risk assessment with sustainability metrics like process mass intensity (PMI) to holistically optimize nanoparticle production [337, 338].
In conclusion, the synergy between plant-derived exosomes and solvent-free green synthesis heralds a transformative era in curcumin delivery. By prioritizing renewable resources, waste reduction, and cost efficiency, these approaches address the dual imperatives of therapeutic efficacy and environmental stewardship, accelerating the transition from laboratory innovation to clinical reality.
Conclusion
This comprehensive review underscores the transformative potential of smart nanoparticle delivery systems in overcoming the intrinsic limitations of curcumin—a naturally derived polyphenol with compelling multimodal anticancer activity. Encapsulation within advanced nanocarriers (e.g., PLGA nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, liposomes, mesoporous silica, and biomimetic exosomes) dramatically enhances curcumin’s aqueous solubility, shields it from rapid degradation and metabolism, and extends systemic circulation. These modifications collectively elevate bioavailability to therapeutically relevant levels—achieving up to a 178-fold increase in plasma AUC in humans with specific co-grinding formulations compared to unformulated curcumin—while facilitating passive tumor accumulation via the EPR effect. Critically, “smart” designs incorporating stimuli-responsive elements (pH-, redox-, or enzyme-triggered release) and active targeting ligands (e.g., folate, transferrin, hyaluronic acid, RGD peptides) enable spatiotemporal control over drug release, significantly improving tumor-specific uptake and minimizing off-target toxicity.
The therapeutic efficacy of nanoformulated curcumin extends across diverse, treatment-resistant malignancies. In triple-negative breast cancer, hyaluronic acid-decorated liposomes suppress metastasis by 70% through dual targeting of bulk tumor cells and CD44+ cancer stem cells. For pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, gemcitabine-curcumin co-loaded nanoparticles overcome stromal barriers and chemoresistance, achieving 71% tumor reduction in preclinical models. Transferrin-conjugated systems enhance blood-brain barrier penetration in glioblastoma, elevating brain curcumin concentrations 8-fold and suppressing tumor growth by 45%. Furthermore, nano-curcumin potently reverses multidrug resistance by inhibiting P-gp efflux and downregulating survival pathways (e.g., NF-κB, STAT3), while synergizing with conventional chemo/radiotherapy to sensitize resistant cells.
Despite promising preclinical outcomes, clinical translation faces significant hurdles. Heterogeneity in the EPR effect across human tumors necessitates patient stratification strategies. Challenges in scalable, GMP-compliant manufacturing—particularly batch-to-batch variability in encapsulation efficiency (21–94% for PLGA NPs)—and long-term biocompatibility assessments (e.g., hepatosplenic accumulation, PEG immunogenicity) remain unresolved. Early-phase trials of liposomal (Lipocurc™) and polymeric (NanoCurc™) curcumin demonstrate target engagement and biological activity but underscore persistent bioavailability challenges and dose-limiting toxicities (e.g., hemolysis at 300 mg/m²). Future efforts must prioritize multifunctional “theranostic” platforms integrating real-time imaging, AI-optimized ligand selection based on tumor receptor profiling, and CRISPR-Cas9 co-delivery for gene-editing-enhanced therapy. Sustainable strategies, such as plant-derived exosomes and solvent-free synthesis, offer scalable, cost-effective alternatives.
In conclusion, smart nanodelivery systems have revolutionized curcumin from a pharmacologically challenged compound into a precision oncology agent. By harmonizing enhanced pharmacokinetics, tumor-targeted delivery, and microenvironment modulation, these innovations unlock curcumin’s full potential to suppress tumor growth, metastasis, and chemoresistance. Overcoming translational barriers through interdisciplinary collaboration and advanced manufacturing will be pivotal in harnessing this promise for clinical oncology.
Author contributions
Yang Fu and Yuanxin Ge conceived of the presented idea. Yang Fu wrote the manuscript with support from Yuanxin Ge. Shixiong Yi and Qifeng Peng supervised the findings of this work. Heng Jiang analyzed the data. Both Yang Fu and Jie Zhou, authors, contributed to the final version of the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine scientific research project (Joint project of Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau) (No. 2024ZYZD006), The Science and Technology Research Program of Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (Grant No. KJQN202215120), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China (No. cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0853).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Yang Fu, Yuanxin Ge
References
- 1.Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Papież MA, Krzyściak W. Biological therapies in the treatment of cancer-update and new directions. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:11694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tao J, Yuan X, Zheng M, Jiang Y, Chen Y, Zhang F, et al. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of cancer nanomedicine from 2013 to 2023. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2024;14:1708–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hao M, Chu Y, Lei J, Yao Z, Wang P, Chen Z, et al. Pharmacological mechanisms and clinical applications of curcumin: update. Aging Dis. 2023;14:716–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wang M, Jiang S, Zhou L, Yu F, Ding H, Li P, et al. Potential mechanisms of action of curcumin for cancer prevention: focus on cellular signaling pathways and miRNAs. Int J Biol Sci. 2019;15:1200–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hassanzadeh K, Buccarello L, Dragotto J, Mohammadi A, Corbo M, Feligioni M. Obstacles against the marketing of curcumin as a drug. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:6619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Urošević M, Nikolić L, Gajić I, Nikolić V, Dinić A, Miljković V. Curcumin: biological activities and modern pharmaceutical forms. Antibiotics. 2022;11:135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ireson C, Orr S, Jones DJ, Verschoyle R, Lim CK, Luo JL, et al. Characterization of metabolites of the chemopreventive agent curcumin in human and rat hepatocytes and in the rat in vivo, and evaluation of their ability to inhibit phorbol ester-induced prostaglandin E2 production. Cancer Res. 2001;61:1058–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Vareed SK, Kakarala M, Ruffin MT, Crowell JA, Normolle DP, Djuric Z, et al. Pharmacokinetics of curcumin conjugate metabolites in healthy human subjects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2008;17:1411–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yakubu J, Pandey AV. Innovative delivery systems for curcumin: exploring nanosized and conventional formulations. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang M, Zhai BT, Fan Y, Sun J, Shi YJ, Zhang XF, et al. Targeted drug delivery systems for curcumin in breast cancer therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18:4275–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fang J, Nakamura H, Maeda H. The EPR effect: unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63:136–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF, Campos E, Rodriguez-Torres M, Acosta-Torres LS, et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16:71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chelimela N, Alavala RR, Satla SR. Curcumin—bioavailability enhancement by prodrug approach and novel formulations. Chem Biodivers. 2024;21:e202302030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Karimi M, Ghasemi A, Sahandi Zangabad P, Rahighi R, Moosavi Basri SM, Mirshekari H, et al. Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45:1457–501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Leng Q, Imtiyaz Z, Woodle MC, Mixson AJ. Delivery of chemotherapy agents and nucleic acids with pH-dependent nanoparticles. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Li M, Zhao G, Su WK, Shuai Q. Enzyme-responsive nanoparticles for anti-tumor drug delivery. Front Chem. 2020;8:647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shahriari M, Zahiri M, Abnous K, Taghdisi SM, Ramezani M, Alibolandi M. Enzyme responsive drug delivery systems in cancer treatment. J Control Release. 2019;308:172–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mu J, Lin J, Huang P, Chen X. Development of endogenous enzyme-responsive nanomaterials for theranostics. Chem Soc Rev. 2018;47:5554–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.An H, Deng X, Wang F, Xu P, Wang N. Dendrimers as nanocarriers for the delivery of drugs obtained from natural products. Polymers. 2023;15:2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hossen S, Hossain MK, Basher MK, Mia M, Rahman MT, Uddin MJ. Smart nanocarrier-based drug delivery systems for cancer therapy and toxicity studies: a review. J Adv Res. 2019;15:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alsehli M. Polymeric nanocarriers as stimuli-responsive systems for targeted tumor (cancer) therapy: recent advances in drug delivery. Saudi Pharm J. 2020;28:255–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Dourado D, Freire DT, Pereira DT, Amaral-Machado L, N Alencar É, de Barros A, et al. Will curcumin nanosystems be the next promising antiviral alternatives in COVID-19 treatment trials? Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;139:111578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jacob S, Kather FS, Morsy MA, Boddu S, Attimarad M, Shah J, et al. Advances in nanocarrier systems for overcoming formulation challenges of curcumin: current insights. Nanomaterials. 2024;14:672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Younes M, Mardirossian R, Rizk L, Fazlian T, Khairallah JP, Sleiman C, et al. The synergistic effects of curcumin and chemotherapeutic drugs in inhibiting metastatic, invasive and proliferative pathways. Plants. 2022;11:2137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tan BL, Norhaizan ME. Curcumin combination chemotherapy: the implication and efficacy in cancer. Molecules. 2019;24:2527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qin SH, Lau A, Liang ZL, Tan HW, Ji YC, Zhong QH, et al. Resveratrol promotes tumor microvessel growth via endoglin and extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling pathway and enhances the anticancer efficacy of gemcitabine against lung cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Z, Xiao M, Guo F, Yan Y, Tian H, Zhang Q, et al. Biodegradable polyester-based nano drug delivery system in cancer chemotherapy: a review of recent progress (2021-2023). Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1295323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Sun S, Wang YH, Gao X, Wang HY, Zhang L, Wang N, et al. Current perspectives and trends in nanoparticle drug delivery systems in breast cancer: bibliometric analysis and review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1253048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karthikeyan A, Senthil N, Min T. Nanocurcumin: a promising candidate for therapeutic applications. Front Pharm. 2020;11:487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhang MR, Fang LL, Guo Y, Wang Q, Li YJ, Sun HF, et al. Advancements in stimulus-responsive co-delivery nanocarriers for enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:3387–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheng Y, Xu Q, Yu M, Dang C, Deng L, Chen H. Curcumin nanoparticles-related non-invasive tumor therapy, and cardiotoxicity relieve. Curr Med Chem. 2025;32:447–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zoi V, Kyritsis AP, Galani V, Lazari D, Sioka C, Voulgaris S, et al. The role of curcumin in cancer: a focus on the PI3K/Akt pathway. Cancers. 2024;16:1554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Guerrero-Hue M, García-Caballero C, Palomino-Antolín A, Rubio-Navarro A, Vázquez-Carballo C, Herencia C, et al. Curcumin reduces renal damage associated with rhabdomyolysis by decreasing ferroptosis-mediated cell death. FASEB J. 2019;33:8961–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Farghadani R, Naidu R. Curcumin: modulator of key molecular signaling pathways in hormone-independent breast cancer. Cancers. 2021;13:3427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wan Mohd Tajuddin WNB, Lajis NH, Abas F, Othman I, Naidu R. Mechanistic understanding of curcumin’s therapeutic effects in lung cancer. Nutrients. 2019;11:2989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Liu Y, Wang X, Zeng S, Zhang X, Zhao J, Zhang X, et al. The natural polyphenol curcumin induces apoptosis by suppressing STAT3 signaling in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37:303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hahn YI, Kim SJ, Choi BY, Cho KC, Bandu R, Kim KP, et al. Curcumin interacts directly with the Cysteine 259 residue of STAT3 and induces apoptosis in H-Ras transformed human mammary epithelial cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8:6409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhu H, Wang X, Wang X, Liu B, Yuan Y, Zuo X. Curcumin attenuates inflammation and cell apoptosis through regulating NF-κB and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway against acute kidney injury. Cell Cycle. 2020;19:1941–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Devi YS, DeVine M, DeKuiper J, Ferguson S, Fazleabas AT. Inhibition of IL-6 signaling pathway by curcumin in uterine decidual cells. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Khayatan D, Razavi SM, Arab ZN, Nasoori H, Fouladi A, Pasha A, et al. Targeting mTOR with curcumin: therapeutic implications for complex diseases. Inflammopharmacology. 2025;33:1583–616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cui J, Li H, Zhang T, Lin F, Chen M, Zhang G, et al. Research progress on the mechanism of curcumin anti-oxidative stress based on signaling pathway. Front Pharm. 2025;16:1548073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zheng X, Liu J, Hu W, Jiang B, Zhou X, Zhang M, et al. Curcumin induces autophagy-mediated ferroptosis by targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway in gastric cancer. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2025;35:625–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tang X, Ding H, Liang M, Chen X, Yan Y, Wan N, et al. Curcumin induces ferroptosis in non-small-cell lung cancer via activating autophagy. Thorac Cancer. 2021;12:1219–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yuan C, Fan R, Zhu K, Wang Y, Xie W, Liang Y. Curcumin induces ferroptosis and apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells by regulating Nrf2/GPX4 signaling pathway. Exp Biol Med. 2023;248:2183–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Jiang Y, Hui D, Pan Z, Yu Y, Liu L, Yu X, et al. Curcumin promotes ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma via upregulation of ACSL4. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024;150:429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Buhrmann C, Kraehe P, Lueders C, Shayan P, Goel A, Shakibaei M. Curcumin suppresses crosstalk between colon cancer stem cells and stromal fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment: potential role of EMT. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e107514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pouliquen DL, Boissard A, Henry C, Coqueret O, Guette C. Curcuminoids as modulators of EMT in invasive cancers: a review of molecular targets with the contribution of malignant mesothelioma studies. Front Pharm. 2022;13:934534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kötting C, Hofmann L, Lotfi R, Engelhardt D, Laban S, Schuler PJ, et al. Immune-stimulatory effects of curcumin on the tumor microenvironment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancers. 2021;13:1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Noratto GD, Jutooru I, Safe S, Angel-Morales G, Mertens-Talcott SU. The drug resistance suppression induced by curcuminoids in colon cancer SW-480 cells is mediated by reactive oxygen species-induced disruption of the microRNA-27a-ZBTB10-Sp axis. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2013;57:1638–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.La X, Zhang L, Li Z, Li H, Yang Y. (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate (EGCG) enhances the sensitivity of colorectal cancer cells to 5-FU by inhibiting GRP78/NF-κB/miR-155-5p/MDR1 pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:2510–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xu T, Guo P, He Y, Pi C, Wang Y, Feng X, et al. Application of curcumin and its derivatives in tumor multidrug resistance. Phytother Res. 2020;34:2438–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hon KW, Naidu R. Synergistic mechanisms of selected polyphenols in overcoming chemoresistance and enhancing chemosensitivity in colorectal cancer. Antioxidants. 2024;13:815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Elmeliegy M, Vourvahis M, Guo C, Wang DD. Effect of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inducers on exposure of P-gp substrates: review of clinical drug-drug interaction studies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59:699–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Xu D, Tian W, Shen H. P-gp upregulation may be blocked by natural curcuminoids, a novel class of chemoresistance-preventing agent. Mol Med Rep. 2013;7:115–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhou X, Wang W, Li P, Zheng Z, Tu Y, Zhang Y, et al. Curcumin enhances the effects of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in inducing gastric cancer cell apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo. Oncol Res. 2016;23:29–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hassan FU, Rehman MS, Khan MS, Ali MA, Javed A, Nawaz A, et al. Curcumin as an alternative epigenetic modulator: mechanism of action and potential effects. Front Genet. 2019;10:514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Anandaradje A, Kalita B, Coumar MS, Selvarajan S. Molecular docking of curcumin and curcuminoids as human Zn(+) dependent histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzyme inhibitors. Silico Pharm. 2024;12:47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fabianowska-Majewska K, Kaufman-Szymczyk A, Szymanska-Kolba A, Jakubik J, Majewski G, Lubecka K. Curcumin from turmeric rhizome: a potential modulator of DNA methylation machinery in breast cancer inhibition. Nutrients. 2021;13:332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen X, Zou LQ, Niu J, Liu W, Peng SF, Liu CM. The stability, sustained release and cellular antioxidant activity of curcumin nanoliposomes. Molecules. 2015;20:14293–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Vadivel D, Zitarosa N, Dondi D. Influence of pH on the release of an active principle from 3D printed carrageenan-k combined with alginate or xanthan gum. Heliyon. 2023;9:e16850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zebib B, Mouloungui Z, Noirot V. Stabilization of curcumin by complexation with divalent cations in glycerol/water system. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2010;2010:292760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Walker BC, Mittal S. Antitumor activity of curcumin in glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:9435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chatterjee P, Dutta SS, Agarwal M, Dey S, Chakraborty T. UV-A-induced photoisomerization and photodimerization of curcumin: an ion mobility mass spectrometry study. J Phys Chem A. 2024;128:548–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Stohs SJ, Chen O, Ray SD, Ji J, Bucci LR, Preuss HG. Highly bioavailable forms of curcumin and promising avenues for curcumin-based research and application: a review. Molecules. 2020;25:1397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kotha RR, Luthria DL. Curcumin: biological, pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and analytical aspects. Molecules. 2019;24:2930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin: problems and promises. Mol Pharm. 2007;4:807–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Hong W, Guo F, Yu N, Ying S, Lou B, Wu J, et al. A novel folic acid receptor-targeted drug delivery system based on curcumin-loaded β-cyclodextrin nanoparticles for cancer treatment. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2021;15:2843–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ucisik MH, Küpcü S, Schuster B, Sleytr UB. Characterization of CurcuEmulsomes: nanoformulation for enhanced solubility and delivery of curcumin. J Nanobiotechnology. 2013;11:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang W, Zhu R, Xie Q, Li A, Xiao Y, Li K, et al. Enhanced bioavailability and efficiency of curcumin for the treatment of asthma by its formulation in solid lipid nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:3667–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sminia P, van den Berg J, van Kootwijk A, Hageman E, Slotman BJ, Verbakel W. Experimental and clinical studies on radiation and curcumin in human glioma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021;147:403–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Senft C, Polacin M, Priester M, Seifert V, Kögel D, Weissenberger J. The nontoxic natural compound Curcumin exerts anti-proliferative, anti-migratory, and anti-invasive properties against malignant gliomas. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Qi X, Jha SK, Jha NK, Dewanjee S, Dey A, Deka R, et al. Antioxidants in brain tumors: current therapeutic significance and future prospects. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Philips CA, Theruvath AH. A comprehensive review on the hepatotoxicity of herbs used in the Indian (Ayush) systems of alternative medicine. Medicine. 2024;103:e37903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Lombardi N, Crescioli G, Maggini V, Ippoliti I, Menniti-Ippolito F, Gallo E, et al. Acute liver injury following turmeric use in Tuscany: an analysis of the Italian Phytovigilance database and systematic review of case reports. Br J Clin Pharm. 2021;87:741–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lu Q, Kou D, Lou S, Ashrafizadeh M, Aref AR, Canadas I, et al. Nanoparticles in tumor microenvironment remodeling and cancer immunotherapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2024;17:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pastorelli D, Fabricio A, Giovanis P, D'Ippolito S, Fiduccia P, Soldà C, et al. Phytosome complex of curcumin as complementary therapy of advanced pancreatic cancer improves safety and efficacy of gemcitabine: results of a prospective phase II trial. Pharm Res. 2018;132:72–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Wang Y, Deng T, Liu X, Fang X, Mo Y, Xie N, et al. Smart nanoplatforms responding to the tumor microenvironment for precise drug delivery in cancer therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:6253–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Wang C, Jiang X, Zhang X, Xu Y, Li L, Li X, et al. A novel solvent-free co-grinding preparation improves curcumin bioavailability in healthy volunteers: a single-center crossover study. Heliyon. 2023;9:e12829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gu Y, Li J, Li Y, Song L, Li D, Peng L, et al. Nanomicelles loaded with doxorubicin and curcumin for alleviating multidrug resistance in lung cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2016;11:5757–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Zheng B, McClements DJ. Formulation of more efficacious curcumin delivery systems using colloid science: enhanced solubility, stability, and bioavailability. Molecules. 2020;25:2791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chen Y, Wu Q, Zhang Z, Yuan L, Liu X, Zhou L. Preparation of curcumin-loaded liposomes and evaluation of their skin permeation and pharmacodynamics. Molecules. 2012;17:5972–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Nagy NZ, Varga Z, Mihály J, Domján A, Fenyvesi É, Kiss É. Highly enhanced curcumin delivery applying association type nanostructures of block copolymers, cyclodextrins and polycyclodextrins. Polymers. 2020;12:2167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Dhule SS, Penfornis P, Frazier T, Walker R, Feldman J, Tan G, et al. Curcumin-loaded γ-cyclodextrin liposomal nanoparticles as delivery vehicles for osteosarcoma. Nanomedicine. 2012;8:440–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Nikolić L, Urošević M, Nikolić V, Gajić I, Dinić A, Miljković V, et al. The formulation of curcumin: 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin complex with smart hydrogel for prolonged release of curcumin. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign LM. PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;99:28–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Zhuang J, Fang RH, Zhang L. Preparation of particulate polymeric therapeutics for medical applications. Small Methods. 2017;1:1700147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Zhang X, Lu J, Huang Y, Zhao W, Chen Y, Li J, et al. PEG-farnesylthiosalicylate conjugate as a nanomicellar carrier for delivery of paclitaxel. Bioconjug Chem. 2013;24:464–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.De Leo V, Milano F, Mancini E, Comparelli R, Giotta L, Nacci A, et al. Encapsulation of curcumin-loaded liposomes for colonic drug delivery in a pH-responsive polymer cluster using a pH-driven and organic solvent-free process. Molecules. 2018;23:739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Salawi A. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: a novel approach to deliver drugs. Drug Deliv. 2022;29:1811–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Lin L, Chen Q, Dai Y, Xia Y. Self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system for enhanced bioavailability of madecassic acid: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18:2345–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Gao Y, Li Z, Sun M, Guo C, Yu A, Xi Y, et al. Preparation and characterization of intravenously injectable curcumin nanosuspension. Drug Deliv. 2011;18:131–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Kevadiya BD, Barvaliya M, Zhang L, Anovadiya A, Brahmbhatt H, Paul P, et al. Fenofibrate Nanocrystals embedded in oral strip-films for bioavailability enhancement. Bioengineering. 2018;5:16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hafez Ghoran S, Calcaterra A, Abbasi M, Taktaz F, Nieselt K, Babaei E. Curcumin-based nanoformulations: a promising adjuvant towards cancer treatment. Molecules. 2022;27:5236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Gupta SC, Patchva S, Aggarwal BB. Therapeutic roles of curcumin: lessons learned from clinical trials. AAPS J. 2013;15:195–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Laffleur F, Millotti G, Lagast J. An overview of oral bioavailability enhancement through self-emulsifying drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2025;22:659–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Gonzales CM, Dalmolin LF, da Silva KA, Slade N, Lopez R, Moreto JA, et al. New insights of turmeric extract-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: development, characterization and in vitro evaluation of antioxidant activity. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2021;76:507–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Elmahboub YSM, Elkordy AA. Polymeric nanoparticles: a promising strategy for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2024;19:549–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Chen XP, Li Y, Zhang Y, Li GW. Formulation, characterization and evaluation of curcumin- loaded PLGA- TPGS nanoparticles for liver cancer treatment. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2019;13:3569–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Samadder A, Bhattacharjee B, Dey S, Chakrovorty A, Dey R, Sow P, et al. Enhanced drug carriage efficiency of curcumin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles in combating diabetic nephropathy via mitigation of renal apoptosis. J Pharmacopunct. 2024;27:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Chuah LH, Roberts CJ, Billa N, Abdullah S, Rosli R. Cellular uptake and anticancer effects of mucoadhesive curcumin-containing chitosan nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;116:228–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Malhotra M, Tomaro-Duchesneau C, Saha S, Prakash S. Systemic siRNA delivery via peptide-tagged polymeric nanoparticles, targeting PLK1 gene in a mouse xenograft model of colorectal cancer. Int J Biomater. 2013;2013:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Pillai SC, Borah A, Le M, Kawano H, Hasegawa K, Kumar DS. Co-delivery of curcumin and bioperine via PLGA nanoparticles to prevent atherosclerotic foam cell formation. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.El-Sherbiny MM, Elekhtiar RS, El-Hefnawy ME, Mahrous H, Alhayyani S, Al-Goul ST, et al. Fabrication and assessment of potent anticancer nanoconjugates from chitosan nanoparticles, curcumin, and eugenol. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1030936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Jamroży M, Kudłacik-Kramarczyk S, Drabczyk A, Krzan M. Advanced drug carriers: a review of selected protein, polysaccharide, and lipid drug delivery platforms. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.García-Pinel B, Porras-Alcalá C, Ortega-Rodríguez A, Sarabia F, Prados J, Melguizo C, et al. Lipid-based nanoparticles: application and recent advances in cancer treatment. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Safta DA, Bogdan C, Moldovan ML. SLNs and NLCs for skin applications: enhancing the bioavailability of natural bioactives. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:1270. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Fang M, Jin Y, Bao W, Gao H, Xu M, Wang D, et al. In vitro characterization and in vivo evaluation of nanostructured lipid curcumin carriers for intragastric administration. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:5395–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Ban C, Jo M, Park YH, Kim JH, Han JY, Lee KW, et al. Enhancing the oral bioavailability of curcumin using solid lipid nanoparticles. Food Chem. 2020;302:125328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Tian C, Asghar S, Wu Y, Kambere Amerigos D, Chen Z, Zhang M, et al. N-acetyl-L-cysteine functionalized nanostructured lipid carrier for improving oral bioavailability of curcumin: preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluations. Drug Deliv. 2017;24:1605–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Akanda M, Getti G, Douroumis D. In vivo evaluation of nanostructured lipid carrier systems (NLCs) in mice bearing prostate cancer tumours. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2023;13:2083–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Hsu CY, Wang PW, Alalaiwe A, Lin ZC, Fang JY. Use of lipid nanocarriers to improve oral delivery of vitamins. Nutrients. 2019;11:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Ali Khan A, Mudassir J, Mohtar N, Darwis Y. Advanced drug delivery to the lymphatic system: lipid-based nanoformulations. Int J Nanomed. 2013;8:2733–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Uner M, Yener G. Importance of solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) in various administration routes and future perspectives. Int J Nanomed. 2007;2:289–300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Zhang X, Fei G, Xiujia S, Ganesan K, Chen J. Natural compound-nanoparticle therapies for breast cancer: a review from 2018-25. Phytomedicine. 2026;150:157652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Sun D, Zhuang X, Xiang X, Liu Y, Zhang S, Liu C, et al. A novel nanoparticle drug delivery system: the anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin is enhanced when encapsulated in exosomes. Mol Ther. 2010;18:1606–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Moballegh Nasery M, Abadi B, Poormoghadam D, Zarrabi A, Keyhanvar P, Khanbabaei H, et al. Curcumin delivery mediated by bio-based nanoparticles: a review. Molecules. 2020;25:689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Chen H, Wang L, Zeng X, Schwarz H, Nanda HS, Peng X. et al. Exosomes, a new star for targeted delivery. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:751079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Xue X, Wang X, Pang M, Yu L, Qian J, Li X, et al. An exosomal strategy for targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts mediated tumors desmoplastic microenvironments. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Qiu M, Zou J, Yang Z, Yang D, Wang R, Guo H. Strategies for targeting peptide-modified exosomes and their applications in the lungs. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:8175–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Yang Q, Li S, Ou H, Zhang Y, Zhu G, Li S, et al. Exosome-based delivery strategies for tumor therapy: an update on modification, loading, and clinical application. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Zhang M, Hu S, Liu L, Dang P, Liu Y, Sun Z, et al. Engineered exosomes from different sources for cancer-targeted therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Djayanti K, Maharjan P, Cho KH, Jeong S, Kim MS, Shin MC, et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a potential nanoplatform: therapeutic applications and considerations. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:6349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Castillo RR, Lozano D, González B, Manzano M, Izquierdo-Barba I, Vallet-Regí M. Advances in mesoporous silica nanoparticles for targeted stimuli-responsive drug delivery: an update. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2019;16:415–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Mohebian Z, Babazadeh M, Zarghami N. In vitro efficacy of curcumin-loaded amine-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles against MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Adv Pharm Bull. 2023;13:317–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Siddiqui B, Rehman AU, Haq IU, Al-Dossary AA, Elaissari A, Ahmed N. Exploiting recent trends for the synthesis and surface functionalization of mesoporous silica nanoparticles towards biomedical applications. Int J Pharm X. 2022;4:100116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Narayan R, Nayak UY, Raichur AM, Garg S. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: a comprehensive review on synthesis and recent advances. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10:118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Hartono SB, Hadisoewignyo L, Yang Y, Meka AK, Antaresti, Yu C. Amine functionalized cubic mesoporous silica nanoparticles as an oral delivery system for curcumin bioavailability enhancement. Nanotechnology. 2016;27:505605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Pérez-Moreno AM, Aranda CJ, Torres MJ, Mayorga C, Paris JL. Immunomodulatory potential of rapamycin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles: pore size-dependent drug loading, release, and in vitro cellular responses. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2024;14:3467–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Pivetta TP, Botteon C, Ribeiro PA, Marcato PD, Raposo M. Nanoparticle systems for cancer phototherapy: an overview. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:3132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Klębowski B, Depciuch J, Parlińska-Wojtan M, Baran J. Applications of noble metal-based nanoparticles in medicine. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:4031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Vemuri SK, Halder S, Banala RR, Rachamalla HK, Devraj VM, Mallarpu CS, et al. Modulatory effects of biosynthesized gold nanoparticles conjugated with curcumin and paclitaxel on tumorigenesis and metastatic pathways-in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:2150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Yadav P, Bandyopadhyay A, Sarkar K. Enhancement of gold-curcumin nanoparticle mediated radiation response for improved therapy in cervical cancer: a computational approach and predictive pathway analysis. Discov Nano. 2024;19:153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Ielo I, Rando G, Giacobello F, Sfameni S, Castellano A, Galletta M, et al. Synthesis, chemical-physical characterization, and biomedical applications of functional gold nanoparticles: a review. Molecules. 2021;26:5823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Pinho S, Ferreira-Gonçalves T, Lopes J, Amaral MN, Viana AS, Coelho J, et al. A step forward for the treatment of localized prostate cancer using gold nanoparticles combined with laser irradiation. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:4488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Gong Y, Hu X, Chen M, Wang J. Recent progress of iron-based nanomaterials in gene delivery and tumor gene therapy. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Meng X, Shen Y, Zhao H, Lu X, Wang Z, Zhao Y. Redox-manipulating nanocarriers for anticancer drug delivery: a systematic review. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Vallet-Regí M, Schüth F, Lozano D, Colilla M, Manzano M. Engineering mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug delivery: where are we after two decades?. Chem Soc Rev. 2022;51:5365–451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Ma W, Wang X, Zhang D, Mu X. Research progress of disulfide bond based tumor microenvironment targeted drug delivery system. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:7547–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Witika BA, Makoni PA, Matafwali SK, Chabalenge B, Mwila C, Kalungia AC, et al. Biocompatibility of biomaterials for nanoencapsulation: current approaches. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Su S. Recent advances in nanocarrier-assisted therapeutics delivery systems. Pharmaceutics. 2020;12:837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Asadi S, Madrakian T, Ahmadi M, Aguirre MÁ, Afkhami A, Uroomiye SS, et al. Aerosol assisted synthesis of a pH responsive curcumin anticancer drug nanocarrier using chitosan and alginate natural polymers. Sci Rep. 2023;13:19389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Parvaneh S, Pourmadadi M, Abdouss M, Pourmousavi SA, Yazdian F, Rahdar A, et al. Carboxymethyl cellulose/starch/reduced graphene oxide composite as a pH-sensitive nanocarrier for curcumin drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;241:124566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Santhamoorthy M, Ramkumar V, Thirupathi K, Gnanasekaran L, Karuppannan V, Phan T, et al. L-lysine functionalized mesoporous silica hybrid nanoparticles for pH-responsive delivery of curcumin. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:1631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Wu X, Zhou Z, Li K, Liu S. Nanomaterials-induced redox imbalance: challenged and opportunities for nanomaterials in cancer therapy. Adv Sci. 2024;11:e2308632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Shi X, Tian Y, Zhai S, Liu Y, Chu S, Xiong Z. The progress of research on the application of redox nanomaterials in disease therapy. Front Chem. 2023;11:1115440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Yu C, Li L, Hu P, Yang Y, Wei W, Deng X, et al. Recent advances in stimulus-responsive nanocarriers for gene therapy. Adv Sci. 2021;8:2100540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Basak S, Das TK. Zwitterionic, stimuli-responsive liposomes for curcumin drug delivery: enhancing M2 macrophage polarization and reducing oxidative stress through enzyme-specific and hyperthermia-triggered release. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025;8:726–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Solanki R, Bhatia D. Stimulus-responsive hydrogels for targeted cancer therapy. Gels. 2024;10:440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Liu J, Zhou Y, Lyu Q, Yao X, Wang W. Targeted protein delivery based on stimuli-triggered nanomedicine. Exploration. 2024;4:20230025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Zhang Q, Hu W, Guo M, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Peng F, et al. MMP-2 responsive peptide hydrogel-based nanoplatform for multimodal tumor therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:53–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Pacifici N, Bolandparvaz A, Lewis JS. Stimuli-responsive biomaterials for vaccines and immunotherapeutic applications. Adv Ther. 2020;3:2000129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Santhamoorthy M, Kim SC. Dual pH- and thermo-sensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-allylamine) nanogels for curcumin delivery: swelling-deswelling behavior and phase transition mechanism. Gels. 2023;9:536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Zhang J, Lin Y, Lin Z, Wei Q, Qian J, Ruan R, et al. Stimuli-responsive nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery in synergistic cancer immunotherapy. Adv Sci. 2022;9:e2103444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Qiu N, Du X, Ji J, Zhai G. A review of stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles for tumor-targeted delivery of curcumin. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2021;47:839–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Setyawati DR, Sekaringtyas FC, Pratiwi RD, Rosyidah A, Azhar R, Gustini N, et al. Recent updates in applications of nanomedicine for the treatment of hepatic fibrosis. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2024;15:1105–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Chen X, Wu D, Chen Z. Biomedical applications of stimuli-responsive nanomaterials. MedComm. 2024;5:e643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Carron PM, Crowley A, O'Shea D, McCann M, Howe O, Hunt M, et al. Targeting the folate receptor: improving efficacy in inorganic medicinal chemistry. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25:2675–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Bazak R, Houri M, El Achy S, Kamel S, Refaat T. Cancer active targeting by nanoparticles: a comprehensive review of literature. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141:769–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Xiang D, Shigdar S, Qiao G, Zhou SF, Li Y, Wei MQ, et al. Aptamer-mediated cancer gene therapy. Curr Gene Ther. 2015;15:109–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Wickens JM, Alsaab HO, Kesharwani P, Bhise K, Amin M, Tekade RK, et al. Recent advances in hyaluronic acid-decorated nanocarriers for targeted cancer therapy. Drug Discov Today. 2017;22:665–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Huang C, Chen F, Zhang L, Yang Y, Yang X, Pan W. 99mTc radiolabeled HA/TPGS-based curcumin-loaded nanoparticle for breast cancer synergistic theranostics: design, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:2987–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Kumar B, Yadav A, Hideg K, Kuppusamy P, Teknos TN, Kumar P. Curcumin and 5-fluorouracil-loaded, folate- and transferrin-decorated polymeric magnetic nanoformulation: a synergistic cancer therapeutic approach, accelerated by magnetic hyperthermia. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:437–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Xu X, Xu L, Wen C, Xia J, Zhang Y, Liang Y. Programming assembly of biomimetic exosomes: an emerging theranostic nanomedicine platform. Mater Today Bio. 2023;22:100760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Gong Y, Liu H, Ke S, Zhuo L, Wang H. Latest advances in biomimetic nanomaterials for diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;9:1037741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Alven S, Aderibigbe BA. Efficacy of polymer-based nanocarriers for co-delivery of curcumin and selected anticancer drugs. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Tomeh MA, Hadianamrei R, Zhao X. A review of curcumin and its derivatives as anticancer agents. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Qi J, Wu W, Wang K, Weng T, Tian Z, Lu Y, et al. Enhancement of oral bioavailability of cyclosporine A: comparison of various nanoscale drug-delivery systems. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:4991–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Mohd Zaffarin AS, Ng SF, Ng MH, Hassan H, Alias E. Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of vitamin E: nanoformulations to enhance bioavailability. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:9961–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Loupakis F, Cremolini C, Masi G, Lonardi S, Zagonel V, Salvatore L, et al. Initial therapy with FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1609–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Jeon Y, Sym SJ, Yoo BK, Baek JH. Long-term survival, tolerability, and safety of first-line bevacizumab and FOLFIRI in combination with ginsenoside-modified nanostructured lipid carrier containing curcumin in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2022;21:15347354221105498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Howells LM, Iwuji C, Irving G, Barber S, Walter H, Sidat Z, et al. Curcumin combined with FOLFOX chemotherapy is safe and tolerable in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in a randomized phase IIa trial. J Nutr. 2019;149:1133–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Guo F, Fu Q, Zhou K, Jin C, Wu W, Ji X, et al. Matrix metalloprotein-triggered, cell penetrating peptide-modified star-shaped nanoparticles for tumor targeting and cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnology. 2020;18:48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Tramontano C, Martins JP, De Stefano L, Kemell M, Correia A, Terracciano M, et al. Microfluidic-assisted production of gastro-resistant active-targeted diatomite nanoparticles for the local release of galunisertib in metastatic colorectal cancer cells. Adv Health Mater. 2023;12:2202672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Casanova F, Pereira CF, Ribeiro AB, Costa EM, Freixo R, Castro PM, et al. Design of innovative biocompatible cellulose nanostructures for the delivery and sustained release of curcumin. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Guo Y, Wang M, Zou Y, Jin L, Zhao Z, Liu Q, et al. Mechanisms of chemotherapeutic resistance and the application of targeted nanoparticles for enhanced chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Nanobiotechnology. 2022;20:371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Nabil G, Alzhrani R, Alsaab HO, Atef M, Sau S, Iyer AK, et al. CD44 targeted nanomaterials for treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancers. 2021;13:898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Qhattal HSS, Liu X. Characterization of CD44-mediated cancer cell uptake and intracellular distribution of hyaluronan-grafted liposomes. Mol Pharm. 2011;8:1233–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Kesharwani P, Chadar R, Sheikh A, Rizg WY, Safhi AY. CD44-Targeted Nanocarrier for Cancer Therapy. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12:800481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Su L, Feng Y, Wei K, Xu X, Liu R, Chen G. Carbohydrate-based macromolecular biomaterials. Chem Rev. 2021;121:10950–1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Ombredane AS, Silva VRP, Andrade LR, Pinheiro WO, Simonelly M, Oliveira JV, et al. In Vivo Efficacy and Toxicity of Curcumin Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Treatment: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol. 2021;11:612903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Qhattal HS, Hye T, Alali A, Liu X. Hyaluronan polymer length, grafting density, and surface poly(ethylene glycol) coating influence in vivo circulation and tumor targeting of hyaluronan-grafted liposomes. ACS Nano. 2014;8:5423–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Feng T, Wei Y, Lee RJ, Zhao L. Liposomal curcumin and its application in cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:6027–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Han NK, Shin DH, Kim JS, Weon KY, Jang CY, Kim JS. Hyaluronan-conjugated liposomes encapsulating gemcitabine for breast cancer stem cells. Int J Nanomed. 2016;11:1413–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Liu Y, Huang P, Hou X, Yan F, Jiang Z, Shi J, et al. Hybrid curcumin-phospholipid complex-near-infrared dye oral drug delivery system to inhibit lung metastasis of breast cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:3311–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Chaudhuri A, Kumar DN, Dehari D, Singh S, Kumar P, Bolla PK, et al. Emergence of nanotechnology as a powerful cavalry against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Dourado D, Miranda JA, de Oliveira MC, Freire DT, Xavier-Júnior FH, Paredes-Gamero EJ, et al. Recent trends in curcumin-containing inorganic-based nanoparticles intended for in vivo cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Zhao S, Tian Y, Liu W, Su Y, Zhang Y, Teng Z, et al. High and low molecular weight hyaluronic acid-coated gold nanobipyramids for photothermal therapy. RSC Adv. 2018;8:9023–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Cheng AL, Hsu CH, Lin JK, Hsu MM, Ho YF, Shen TS. Phase I clinical trial of curcumin, a chemopreventive agent, in patients with high-risk or pre-malignant lesions. Anticancer Res. 2001;21 4B:2895–900. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Bisht S, Mizuma M, Feldmann G, Ottenhof NA, Hong SM, Pramanik D, et al. Systemic administration of polymeric nanoparticle-encapsulated curcumin (NanoCurc) blocks tumor growth and metastases in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2010;9:2255–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Caputo D, Pozzi D, Farolfi T, Passa R, Coppola R, Caracciolo G. Nanotechnology and pancreatic cancer management: State of the art and further perspectives. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021;13:231–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Bhatia M, Bhalerao M, Cruz-Martins N, Kumar D. Curcumin and cancer biology: focusing regulatory effects in different signalling pathways. Phytother Res. 2021;35:4913–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Ma T, Jiang JL, Qi WX, Chen JY, Xu HP. A novel delivery system of RGD-HSA loaded GEM/CUR nanoparticles for the treatment of pancreatic cancer therapy. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2022;16:2395–406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Wang M, Xue W, Yuan H, Wang Z, Yu L. Nano-drug delivery systems targeting CAFs: a promising treatment for pancreatic cancer. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:2823–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Zhang C, Lin Z, Jiao L, Jiang HL. Metal-organic frameworks for electrocatalytic CO(2) reduction: from catalytic site design to microenvironment modulation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2024;63:e202414506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Zheng J, Jiang J, Pu Y, Xu T, Sun J, Zhang Q, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages in nanomaterial-based anti-tumor therapy: as target spots or delivery platforms. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1248421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Strand MS, Krasnick BA, Pan H, Zhang X, Bi Y, Brooks C, et al. Precision delivery of RAS-inhibiting siRNA to KRAS driven cancer via peptide-based nanoparticles. Oncotarget. 2019;10:4761–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Wang Y, Bui TA, Yang X, Hutvagner G, Deng W. Advancements in gene therapies targeting mutant KRAS in cancers. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2025;44:24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Yadav P, Bandyopadhyay A, Chakraborty A, Sarkar K. Enhancement of anticancer activity and drug delivery of chitosan-curcumin nanoparticle via molecular docking and simulation analysis. Carbohydr Polym. 2018;182:188–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Kim J. Nucleic acid-based approaches to tackle KRAS mutant cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:16933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Wong SC, Kamarudin MNA, Naidu R. Anticancer mechanism of curcumin on human glioblastoma. Nutrients. 2021;13:950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Ghosh M, Ryan RO. ApoE enhances nanodisk-mediated curcumin delivery to glioblastoma multiforme cells. Nanomedicine. 2014;9:763–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Tahmasebi Mirgani M, Isacchi B, Sadeghizadeh M, Marra F, Bilia AR, Mowla SJ, et al. Dendrosomal curcumin nanoformulation downregulates pluripotency genes via miR-145 activation in U87MG glioblastoma cells. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:403–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Gao H. Progress and perspectives on targeting nanoparticles for brain drug delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2016;6:268–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Nowacka A, Ziółkowska E, Smuczyński W, Bożiłow D, Śniegocki M. Potential of curcumin and its analogs in glioblastoma therapy. Antioxidants. 2025;14:351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Asimakidou E, Tan J, Zeng J, Lo CH. Blood-brain barrier-targeting nanoparticles: biomaterial properties and biomedical applications in translational neuroscience. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17:612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Brown SL, Snyder JM, Ali MM. Dendrimer-based nanomedicine (paramagnetic nanoparticle, nanocombretastatin, nanocurcumin) for glioblastoma multiforme imaging and therapy. Nov Approaches Cancer Study. 2021;6:609–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Mukherjee S, Baidoo J, Fried A, Atwi D, Dolai S, Boockvar J, et al. Curcumin changes the polarity of tumor-associated microglia and eliminates glioblastoma. Int J Cancer. 2016;139:2838–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Obrador E, Moreno-Murciano P, Oriol-Caballo M, López-Blanch R, Pineda B, Gutiérrez-Arroyo JL, et al. Glioblastoma therapy: past, present and future. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:2529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Omidian H, Gill EJ, Cubeddu LX. Lipid nanoparticles in lung cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Mohanty A, Uthaman S, Park IK. Utilization of polymer-lipid hybrid nanoparticles for targeted anti-cancer therapy. Molecules. 2020;25:4377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Gajbhiye KR, Salve R, Narwade M, Sheikh A, Kesharwani P, Gajbhiye V. Lipid polymer hybrid nanoparticles: a custom-tailored next-generation approach for cancer therapeutics. Mol Cancer. 2023;22:160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Rahman MA, Ali A, Rahamathulla M, Salam S, Hani U, Wahab S, et al. Fabrication of sustained release curcumin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (Cur-SLNs) as a potential drug delivery system for the treatment of lung cancer: optimization of formulation and in vitro biological evaluation. Polymers. 2023;15:542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Chen Y, Deng Y, Zhu C, Xiang C. Anti prostate cancer therapy: aptamer-functionalized, curcumin and cabazitaxel co-delivered, tumor targeted lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;127:110181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Kokkinis S, Paudel KR, De Rubis G, Yeung S, Singh M, Singh SK, et al. Liposomal encapsulated curcumin attenuates lung cancer proliferation, migration, and induces apoptosis. Heliyon. 2024;10:e38409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Wu Q, Ou H, Shang Y, Zhang X, Wu J, Fan F. Nanoscale formulations: incorporating curcumin into combination strategies for the treatment of lung cancer. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2021;15:2695–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Khan MN, Haggag YA, Lane ME, McCarron PA, Tambuwala MM. Polymeric nano-encapsulation of curcumin enhances its anti-cancer activity in breast (MDA-MB231) and lung (A549) cancer cells through reduction in expression of HIF-1α and nuclear p65 (Rel A). Curr Drug Deliv. 2018;15:286–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Yin H, Zhang H, Liu B. Superior anticancer efficacy of curcumin-loaded nanoparticles against lung cancer. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin. 2013;45:634–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Javed Z, Khan K, Rasheed A, Sadia H, Shahwani MN, Irshad A, et al. Targeting androgen receptor signaling with microRNAs and curcumin: a promising therapeutic approach for prostate cancer prevention and intervention. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21:77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.AbouAitah K, Soliman A, Swiderska-Sroda A, Nassrallah A, Smalc-Koziorowska J, Gierlotka S, et al. Co-delivery system of curcumin and colchicine using functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles promotes anticancer and apoptosis effects. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers. 2011;3:1377–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Alsaab HO, Alharbi FD, Alhibs AS, Alanazi NB, Alshehri BY, Saleh MA, et al. PLGA-based nanomedicine: history of advancement and development in clinical applications of multiple diseases. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Sarkar E, Khan A, Ahmad R, Misra A, Raza ST, Mahdi AA. Synergistic anticancer efficacy of curcumin and doxorubicin combination treatment inducing S-phase cell cycle arrest in triple-negative breast cancer cells: an in vitro study. Cureus. 2024;16:75047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Zeng J, Sun P, Fang X, Jiang Y, Wu Z, Qi X. “Shell-core” bilayer nanoparticle as chemotherapeutic drug co-delivery platforms render synchronized microenvironment respond and enhanced antitumor effects. Int J Nanomed. 2023;18:1521–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Yoo H, Kim Y, Kim J, Cho H, Kim K. Overcoming cancer drug resistance with nanoparticle strategies for key protein inhibition. Molecules. 2024;29:3994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Guo F, Yu N, Jiao Y, Hong W, Zhou K, Ji X, et al. Star polyester-based folate acid-targeting nanoparticles for doxorubicin and curcumin co-delivery to combat multidrug-resistant breast cancer. Drug Deliv. 2021;28:1709–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Wang C, Zhang J, Wei X, Yang M, Ma W, Yu R, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of marine lissodendrins B analogues as modulators of ABCB1-mediated multidrug resistance. Mar Drugs. 2023;21:314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Zhang Y, Li K, Han X, Chen Q, Shao L, Bai D. A photochemical-responsive nanoparticle boosts doxorubicin uptake to suppress breast cancer cell proliferation by apoptosis. Sci Rep. 2022;12:10354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Cui T, Zhang S, Sun H. Co-delivery of doxorubicin and pH-sensitive curcumin prodrug by transferrin-targeted nanoparticles for breast cancer treatment. Oncol Rep. 2017;37:1253–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Jia M, Zhang D, Zhang C, Li C. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems modulate the tumor microenvironment in pancreatic cancer for enhanced therapy. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021;19:384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Hayakawa T, Yaguchi T, Kawakami Y. Enhanced anti-tumor effects of the PD-1 blockade combined with a highly absorptive form of curcumin targeting STAT3. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:4326–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Liu L, Lim MA, Jung SN, Oh C, Won HR, Jin YL, et al. The effect of Curcumin on multi-level immune checkpoint blockade and T cell dysfunction in head and neck cancer. Phytomedicine. 2021;92:153758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Zhu F, Tan G, Zhong Y, Jiang Y, Cai L, Yu Z, et al. Smart nanoplatform for sequential drug release and enhanced chemo-thermal effect of dual drug loaded gold nanorod vesicles for cancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019;17:44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Huang Y, Wang T, Yang J, Wu X, Fan W, Chen J. Current strategies for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by modulating the tumor microenvironment via nano-delivery systems: a review. Int J Nanomed. 2022;17:2335–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Luo L, Lin C, Wang P, Cao D, Lin Y, Wang W, et al. Combined use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and phytochemicals as a novel therapeutic strategy against cancer. J Cancer. 2023;14:2315–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Lv Z, Zhang P, Li D, Qin M, Nie L, Wang X, et al. CD19-targeting fusion protein combined with PD1 antibody enhances anti-tumor immunity in mouse models. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9:1747688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Wang Y, Lu J, Jiang B, Guo J. The roles of curcumin in regulating the tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment. Oncol Lett. 2020;19:3059–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Ji P, Wang X, Yin J, Mou Y, Huang H, Ren Z. Selective delivery of curcumin to breast cancer cells by self-targeting apoferritin nanocages with pH-responsive and low toxicity. Drug Deliv. 2022;29:986–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Zhu J, Li Q, Wu Z, Xu Y, Jiang R. Curcumin for treating breast cancer: a review of molecular mechanisms, combinations with anticancer drugs, and nanosystems. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Kandjani BZ, Hesari FS, Babaei E. Gemini curcumin inhibits 4T1 cancer cell proliferation and modulates the expression of apoptotic and metastatic genes in Balb/c mice model. Pathol Res Pr. 2023;243:154344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Storka A, Vcelar B, Klickovic U, Gouya G, Weisshaar S, Aschauer S, et al. Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of liposomal curcumin in healthy humans. Int J Clin Pharm Ther. 2015;53:54–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.De Jaeghere EA, Tuyaerts S, Van Nuffel A, Belmans A, Bogaerts K, Baiden-Amissah R, et al. Pembrolizumab, radiotherapy, and an immunomodulatory five-drug cocktail in pretreated patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical or endometrial carcinoma: results of the phase II PRIMMO study. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72:475–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Sun H, Zhan M, Mignani S, Shcharbin D, Majoral JP, Rodrigues J, et al. Modulation of macrophages using nanoformulations with curcumin to treat inflammatory diseases: a concise review. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Teiten MH, Dicato M, Diederich M. Hybrid curcumin compounds: a new strategy for cancer treatment. Molecules. 2014;19:20839–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Shah SS, Turakhia BP, Purohit N, Kapadiya KM, Sahoo CR, Prajapati A. Facile green synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles and their impact on cytotoxicity, antioxidative properties and bactericidal activity. Iran Biomed J. 2024;28:71–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Yin C, Hu P, Qin L, Wang Z, Zhao H. The current status and future directions on nanoparticles for tumor molecular imaging. Int J Nanomed. 2024;19:9549–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Zhang Y, Zhang B, Liu F, Luo J, Bai J. In vivo tomographic imaging with fluorescence and MRI using tumor-targeted dual-labeled nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:33–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Shin TH, Choi Y, Kim S, Cheon J. Recent advances in magnetic nanoparticle-based multi-modal imaging. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:4501–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Li W, Sun Y, Chen J, Jiang Z, Yang J. PEGylated cisplatin nanoparticles for treating colorectal cancer in a pH-responsive manner. J Immunol Res. 2022;2022:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Fu Y, Sun J, Wang Y, Li W. Glucose oxidase and metal catalysts combined tumor synergistic therapy: mechanism, advance and nanodelivery system. J Nanobiotechnology. 2023;21:400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 251.Glasgow MDK, Chougule MB. Recent developments in active tumor targeted multifunctional nanoparticles for combination chemotherapy in cancer treatment and imaging. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11:1859–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Yang J, Yang B, Shi J. A nanomedicine-enabled ion-exchange strategy for enhancing curcumin-based rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023;62:e202310061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Kumari N, Choi SH. Tumor-associated macrophages in cancer: recent advancements in cancer nanoimmunotherapies. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Luengo Morato Y, Ovejero Paredes K, Lozano Chamizo L, Marciello M, Filice M. Recent advances in multimodal molecular imaging of cancer mediated by hybrid magnetic nanoparticles. Polymers. 2021;13:2989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Kang W, Tian Y, Zhao Y, Yin X, Teng Z. Applications of nanocomposites based on zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 in photodynamic and synergistic anti-tumor therapy. RSC Adv. 2022;12:16927–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Madeo LF, Schirmer C, Cirillo G, Froeschke S, Hantusch M, Curcio M, et al. Facile one-pot hydrothermal synthesis of a zinc oxide/curcumin nanocomposite with enhanced toxic activity against breast cancer cells. RSC Adv. 2023;13:27180–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Zhang X, Hu S, Huang L, Chen X, Wang X, Fu YN, et al. Advance progress in assembly mechanisms of carrier-free nanodrugs for cancer treatment. Molecules. 2023;28:7065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Song W, Su X, Gregory DA, Li W, Cai Z, Zhao X. Magnetic alginate/chitosan nanoparticles for targeted delivery of curcumin into human breast cancer cells. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Bertoncini-Silva C, Vlad A, Ricciarelli R, Giacomo Fassini P, Suen V, Zingg JM. Enhancing the bioavailability and bioactivity of curcumin for disease prevention and treatment. Antioxidants. 2024;13:331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Shao M, Zhang W, Wang F, Wang L, Du H. A copper silicate-based multifunctional nanoplatform with glutathione depletion and hypoxia relief for synergistic photodynamic/chemodynamic therapy. Materials. 2024;17:3495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Greil R, Greil-Ressler S, Weiss L, Schönlieb C, Magnes T, Radl B, et al. A phase 1 dose-escalation study on the safety, tolerability and activity of liposomal curcumin (Lipocurc(™)) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharm. 2018;82:695–706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Ahmadi R, Salari S, Sharifi MD, Reihani H, Rostamiani MB, Behmadi M, et al. Oral nano-curcumin formulation efficacy in the management of mild to moderate outpatient COVID-19: a randomized triple-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial. Food Sci Nutr. 2021;9:4068–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Lim KJ, Bisht S, Bar EE, Maitra A, Eberhart CG. A polymeric nanoparticle formulation of curcumin inhibits growth, clonogenicity and stem-like fraction in malignant brain tumors. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;11:464–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Hao M, Zhang C, Wang T, Hu H. Pharmacological effects, formulations, and clinical research progress of curcumin. Front Pharm. 2025;16:1509045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Hassaniazad M, Inchehsablagh BR, Kamali H, Tousi A, Eftekhar E, Jaafari MR, et al. The clinical effect of nano micelles containing curcumin as a therapeutic supplement in patients with COVID-19 and the immune responses balance changes following treatment: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2020;21:876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Li X, Li S, Ma C, Li T, Yang L. Preparation of baicalin-loaded ligand-modified nanoparticles for nose-to-brain delivery for neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia. Drug Deliv. 2022;29:1282–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Pandya AK, Vora LK, Umeyor C, Surve D, Patel A, Biswas S, et al. Polymeric in situ forming depots for long-acting drug delivery systems. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023;200:115003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Parashar S, Chauhan C, Rajasekharan A, Rautela J, Jain T, Raza K. An Augmented Method for Collecting PLGA Nanoparticles and the Fabrication of 1, 3, 4, 6-Tetra-Oacetyl-2-azido-2-deoxy-D-glucopyranose (Ac42AzGlc)-Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for Efficient and Prospective in Vivo Metabolic Processing. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:833456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Elsewedy HS, Dhubiab B, Mahdy MA, Elnahas HM. Development, optimization, and evaluation of PEGylated brucine-loaded PLGA nanoparticles. Drug Deliv. 2020;27:1134–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.McCall RL, Sirianni RW. PLGA nanoparticles formed by single- or double-emulsion with vitamin E-TPGS. J Vis Exp. 2013;27:51015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:20–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Bresseleers J, Bagheri M, Storm G, Metselaar JM, Hennink WE, Meeuwissen SA, et al. Scale-up of the manufacturing process to produce docetaxel-loaded mPEG-b-p(HPMA-Bz) block copolymer micelles for pharmaceutical applications. Org Process Res Dev. 2019;23:2707–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Rodríguez F, Caruana P, De la Fuente N, Español P, Gámez M, Balart J, et al. Nano-based approved pharmaceuticals for cancer treatment: present and future challenges. Biomolecules. 2022;12:784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Blanco-Cabra N, Alcàcer-Almansa J, Admella J, Arévalo-Jaimes BV, Torrents E. Nanomedicine against biofilm infections: a roadmap of challenges and limitations. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2024;16:e1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Lim SB, Banerjee A, Önyüksel H. Improvement of drug safety by the use of lipid-based nanocarriers. J Control Release. 2012;163:34–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Shokoohinia P, Hajialyani M, Sadrjavadi K, Akbari M, Rahimi M, Khaledian S, et al. Microfluidic-assisted preparation of PLGA nanoparticles for drug delivery purposes: experimental study and computational fluid dynamic simulation. Res Pharm Sci. 2019;14:459–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Streck S, Neumann H, Nielsen HM, Rades T, McDowell A. Comparison of bulk and microfluidics methods for the formulation of poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles modified with cell-penetrating peptides of different architectures. Int J Pharm X. 2019;1:100030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Shen Y, Gwak H, Han B. Advanced manufacturing of nanoparticle formulations of drugs and biologics using microfluidics. Analyst. 2024;149:614–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Operti MC, Bernhardt A, Sincari V, Jager E, Grimm S, Engel A, et al. Industrial scale manufacturing and downstream processing of PLGA-based nanomedicines suitable for fully continuous operation. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Raghava Srivalli KM, Mishra B. Drug nanocrystals: a way toward scale-up. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24:386–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Yang H, Gao Y, Liu M, Ma J, Lu Q. Process optimization of scaled-up production and biosafety evaluation of the dimethyl-dioctadecyl-ammonium bromide/poly(lactic acid) nano-vaccine. J Funct Biomater. 2024;15:127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Alshaer W, Nsairat H, Lafi Z, Hourani OM, Al-Kadash A, Esawi E, et al. Quality by design approach in liposomal formulations: robust product development. Molecules. 2022;28:10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Pielenhofer J, Meiser SL, Gogoll K, Ciciliani AM, Denny M, Klak M, et al. Quality by design (QbD) approach for a nanoparticulate imiquimod formulation as an investigational medicinal product. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Bochicchio S, Lamberti G, Barba AA. Polymer-lipid pharmaceutical nanocarriers: innovations by new formulations and production technologies. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Shi Y, Lammers T, Storm G, Hennink WE. Physico-chemical strategies to enhance stability and drug retention of polymeric micelles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Macromol Biosci. 2017;17. 10.1002/mabi.201600160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 286.Chen B-M, Su YC, Chang CJ, Burnouf PA, Chuang KH, Chen CH, et al. Measurement of pre-existing IgG and IgM antibodies against polyethylene glycol in healthy individuals. Anal Chem. 2016;88:10661–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Crofton KM, Bassan A, Behl M, Chushak YG, Fritsche E, Gearhart JM, et al. Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches. Comput Toxicol. 2022;22:100223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Ju Y, Lee WS, Pilkington EH, Kelly HG, Li S, Selva KJ, et al. Anti-PEG antibodies boosted in humans by SARS-CoV-2 lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccine. ACS Nano. 2022;16:11769–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 289.Romeo D, Salieri B, Hischier R, Nowack B, Wick P. An integrated pathway based on in vitro data for the human hazard assessment of nanomaterials. Environ Int. 2020;137:105505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Chirio D, Peira E, Dianzani C, Muntoni E, Gigliotti CL, Ferrara B, et al. Development of solid lipid nanoparticles by cold dilution of microemulsions: curcumin loading, preliminary in vitro studies, and biodistribution. Nanomaterials. 2019;9:230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Wei Y, Li K, Zhao W, He Y, Shen H, Yuan J, et al. The effects of a novel curcumin derivative loaded long-circulating solid lipid nanoparticle on the MHCC-97H liver cancer cells and pharmacokinetic behavior. Int J Nanomed. 2022;17:2225–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Fonseca-Gomes J, Loureiro JA, Tanqueiro SR, Mouro FM, Ruivo P, Carvalho T, et al. In vivo bio-distribution and toxicity evaluation of polymeric and lipid-based nanoparticles: a potential approach for chronic diseases treatment. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:8609–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Pei K, Georgi M, Hill D, Lam C, Wei W, Cordeiro MF. Review: Neuroprotective nanocarriers in glaucoma. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17:1190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Fatima N, Akcan U, Kaya M, Gromnicova R, Loughlin J, Sharrack B, et al. Tissue distribution and cellular localization of gold nanocarriers with bound oligonucleotides. Nanomedicine. 2021;16:709–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.De Jong WH, Geertsma RE, Borchard G. Regulatory safety evaluation of nanomedical products: key issues to refine. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12:2042–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Soares S, Sousa J, Pais A, Vitorino C. Nanomedicine: Principles, Properties, and Regulatory Issues. Front Chem. 2018;6:360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Foulkes R, Man E, Thind J, Yeung S, Joy A, Hoskins C. The regulation of nanomaterials and nanomedicines for clinical application: current and future perspectives. Biomater Sci. 2020;8:4653–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Kumbhar PR, Kumar P, Lasure A, Velayutham R, Mandal D. An updated landscape on nanotechnology-based drug delivery, immunotherapy, vaccinations, imaging, and biomarker detections for cancers: recent trends and future directions with clinical success. Discov Nano. 2023;18:156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Tirumala MG, Anchi P, Raja S, Rachamalla M, Godugu C. Novel Methods and Approaches for Safety Evaluation of Nanoparticle Formulations: A Focus Towards In Vitro Models and Adverse Outcome Pathways. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:612659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Xuan L, Ju Z, Skonieczna M, Zhou PK, Huang R. Nanoparticles-induced potential toxicity on human health: applications, toxicity mechanisms, and evaluation models. MedComm. 2023;4:e327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Kozma GT, Mészáros T, Berényi P, Facskó R, Patkó Z, Oláh CZ, et al. Role of anti-polyethylene glycol (PEG) antibodies in the allergic reactions to PEG-containing Covid-19 vaccines: evidence for immunogenicity of PEG. Vaccine. 2023;41:4561–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Schmutz M, Borges O, Jesus S, Borchard G, Perale G, Zinn M, et al. A Methodological Safe-by-Design Approach for the Development of Nanomedicines. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Serrano DR, Luciano FC, Anaya BJ, Ongoren B, Kara A, Molina G, et al. Artificial intelligence (AI) applications in drug discovery and drug delivery: revolutionizing personalized medicine. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16:1328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Rezvantalab S, Mihandoost S, Rezaiee M. Machine learning assisted exploration of the influential parameters on the PLGA nanoparticles. Sci Rep. 2024;14:1114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Hristova-Panusheva K, Xenodochidis C, Georgieva M, Krasteva N. Nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery systems for precision targeting in oncology. Pharmaceuticals. 2024;17:677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Smith JP, Chen W, Shivapurkar N, Gerber M, Tucker RD, Kallakury B, et al. Target-specific nanoparticle polyplex down-regulates mutant Kras to prevent pancreatic carcinogenesis and halt tumor progression. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Song Z, Tao Y, Liu Y, Li J. Advances in delivery systems for CRISPR/Cas-mediated cancer treatment: a focus on viral vectors and extracellular vesicles. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1444437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Luo D, Xu X, Iqbal MZ, Zhao Q, Zhao R, Farheen J, et al. siRNA-loaded hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for KRAS gene silencing in anti-pancreatic cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Lei L, Pan W, Shou X, Shao Y, Ye S, Zhang J, et al. Nanomaterials-assisted gene editing and synthetic biology for optimizing the treatment of pulmonary diseases. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Duan L, Ouyang K, Xu X, Xu L, Wen C, Zhou X, et al. Nanoparticle Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for Genome Editing. Front Genet. 2021;12:673286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Balasubramanian A, Veluswami K, Rao S, Aggarwal S, Mani S. Exploring clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) as a therapeutic modality for cancer: a scoping review. Cureus. 2024;16:64324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Jabir NR, Tabrez S, Ashraf GM, Shakil S, Damanhouri GA, Kamal MA. Nanotechnology-based approaches in anticancer research. Int J Nanomed. 2012;7:4391–408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Zhang J, Li Y, Guo S, Zhang W, Fang B, Wang S. Moving beyond traditional therapies: the role of nanomedicines in lung cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1363346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Ramalho MJ, Loureiro JA, Coelho M, Pereira MC. Transferrin receptor-targeted nanocarriers: overcoming barriers to treat glioblastoma. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Jiang F, Liu B, Lu J, Li F, Li D, Liang C, et al. Progress and challenges in developing aptamer-functionalized targeted drug delivery systems. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:23784–822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Kondrashov A, Sapkota S, Sharma A, Riano I, Kurzrock R, Adashek JJ. Antibody-drug conjugates in solid tumor oncology: an effectiveness payday with a targeted payload. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:2160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.van Tilburg CM, Witt R, Heiss M, Pajtler KW, Plass C, Poschke I, et al. INFORM2 NivEnt: the first trial of the INFORM2 biomarker driven phase I/II trial series: the combination of nivolumab and entinostat in children and adolescents with refractory high-risk malignancies. BMC Cancer. 2020;20:523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Chaudhary K, Poirion OB, Lu L, Garmire LX. Deep learning-based multi-omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:1248–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Hass H, Masson K, Wohlgemuth S, Paragas V, Allen JE, Sevecka M, et al. Predicting ligand-dependent tumors from multi-dimensional signaling features. NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2017;3:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Murar M, Albertazzi L, Pujals S. Advanced optical imaging-guided nanotheranostics towards personalized cancer drug delivery. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.De Piano R, Caccavo D, Lamberti G, Remaut K, Seynaeve H, Barba AA. A new productive approach and formulative optimization for curcumin nanoliposomal delivery systems. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Fernández M, Javaid F, Chudasama V. Advances in targeting the folate receptor in the treatment/imaging of cancers. Chem Sci. 2018;9:790–810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Din FU, Aman W, Ullah I, Qureshi OS, Mustapha O, Shafique S, et al. Effective use of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for the treatment of selected tumors. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:7291–309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.Thivat E, Casile M, Moreau J, Molnar I, Dufort S, Seddik K, et al. Phase I/II study testing the combination of AGuIX nanoparticles with radiochemotherapy and concomitant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (NANO-GBM trial protocol). BMC Cancer. 2023;23:344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Antoniou M, Kolamunnage-Dona R, Jorgensen A. Biomarker-guided non-adaptive trial designs in phase II and phase III: a methodological review. J Pers Med. 2017;7:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Madhan S, Dhar R, Devi A. Plant-derived exosomes: a green approach for cancer drug delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12:2236–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Dutta S, Ghosh S, Rahaman M, Chowdhary SR. Plant-derived exosomes: pioneering breakthroughs in therapeutics, targeted drug delivery, and regenerative medicine. Pharm Nanotechnol. 2025;13:804–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Alzahrani FA, Khan MI, Kameli N, Alsahafi E, Riza YM. Plant-derived extracellular vesicles and their exciting potential as the future of next-generation drug delivery. Biomolecules. 2023;13:839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Cai Y, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Lu R. Plant-derived exosomes as a drug-delivery approach for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and colitis-associated cancer. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Venkatas J, Daniels A, Singh M. The potential of curcumin-capped nanoparticle synthesis in cancer therapy: a green synthesis approach. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:3201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Xie X, Tao Q, Zou Y, Zhang F, Guo M, Wang Y, et al. PLGA nanoparticles improve the oral bioavailability of curcumin in rats: characterizations and mechanisms. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:9280–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Stepanova VA, Guerrero A, Schull C, Christensen J, Trudeau C, Cook J, et al. Hybrid synthetic and computational study of an optimized, solvent-free approach to curcuminoids. ACS Omega. 2022;7:7257–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Dayanandan AP, Cho WJ, Kang H, Bello AB, Kim BJ, Arai Y, et al. Emerging nano-scale delivery systems for the treatment of osteoporosis. Biomater Res. 2023;27:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Patiño-Ruiz DA, Meramo-Hurtado SI, González-Delgado ÁD, Herrera A. Environmental sustainability evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticles synthesized via green synthesis and the coprecipitation method: a comparative life cycle assessment study. ACS Omega. 2021;6:12410–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Parajuli D. MXenes-polymer nanocomposites for biomedical applications: fundamentals and future perspectives. Front Chem. 2024;12:1400375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Zhang Y, Poon K, Masonsong G, Ramaswamy Y, Singh G. Sustainable nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Pharmaceutics. 2023;15:922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Wang H, Li Q, Alam P, Bai H, Bhalla V, Bryce MR, et al. Aggregation-induced emission (AIE), life and health. ACS Nano. 2023;17:14347–405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Salieri B, Barruetabeña L, Rodríguez-Llopis I, Jacobsen NR, Manier N, Trouiller B, et al. Integrative approach in a safe by design context combining risk, life cycle and socio-economic assessment for safer and sustainable nanomaterials. NanoImpact. 2021;23:100335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


