Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 21;33(4):1353–1364. doi: 10.1007/s11356-026-37427-2

Table 3.

Comparison of metals’ concentrations (mg kg−1) among the studied tree species, inside the airport area. Within the same metal, values followed by different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05, Duncan's test)

Mean concentration (Std error of mean in parenthesis), in mg kg−1 dry matter
Urban Forest Trees Cr Cu Co Zn Ni Pb Fe Mn Cd
Pinus brutia 1.481 a (0.111) 5.542 (0.182) 0.092 bc (0.006) 20.773 b (1.466) 1.164 a (0.087) 1.155 a (0.407) 227.533 a (20.914) 21.743 b (2.457)

0.009 c

(0.006)

Populus alba 0.309 b (0.014) 5.334 (0.559) 0.728 a (0.083) 55.463 a (1.755) 1.094 a (0.256) 0.062 b (0.013) 62.093 c (5.307) 30.287 ab (2.774) 0.030 b (0.013)
Tamarix sp. 0.499 b (0.097) 6.345 (0.416) 0.171 b (0.066) 13.149 c (1.973) 0.495 b (0.068) 0.268 b (0.127) 167.166 b (14.042) 32.400 a (3.176) 0.330 a (0.247)
Olea europaea 0.398 b (0.059) 5.427 (0.639) 0.019 bc (0.007) 15.046 c (1.291) 0.779 ab (0.200) 0.133 b (0.075) 97.410 c (12.252) 23.163 ab (2.786) 0.003 c (0.000)
Nerium oleander 0.418 b (0.009) 6.609 (0.597) 0.006 c (0.000) 18.070 bc (1.149) 0.958 ab (0.014) 0.062 b (0.013) 87.840 c (5.672) 28.123 ab (3.563) 0.003 c (0.000)