Abstract
Vegetables are essential for human nutrition due to their low fat content and high levels of vitamins, minerals, and dietary fiber. However, studies have shown that vegetables are vulnerable to PTE contamination as a result of anthropogenic activities. This study determined the concentrations and health impacts associated with potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in specific vegetables (green beans, spinach, green pepper, carrots, and onions). A total of 90 vegetable samples were randomly selected and purchased from local markets and analyzed for potentially toxic elements (PTEs) (Cd, Fe, Cr, Pb, Cu, Zn, Co, and Ni) using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). The mean concentrations (mg·kg-1) of PTEs ranged from 0.006 - 0.021 for Cd, 2.27 - 12.32 for Fe, 0.05 - 0.150 for Cr, 0.087 - 0.254 for Pb, 0.035 - 0.062 for Cu, 2.65 - 15.61 for Zn, 0.010 - 0.050 for Co, and 0.012 - 0.058 for Ni. The abundance of PTEs was found to be in the following declining order: Zn >Fe >Cu >Cr >Ni >Co >Pb >Cd. The hazard index (HI) for both children and adults was <1, suggesting that there is no likely non-carcinogenic effect from consuming these vegetables. Similarly, the carcinogenic risk was below the acceptable value range of 1.0 × 10-6 - 1.0 × 10-4. Based on the results of this study, it is unlikely that the vegetables analyzed pose a health risk to consumers. However, monitoring and continuous stringent regulations of PTEs on foodstuff for public health protection.
Keywords: Assessment, Determination, Market, PTEs, Vegetables
Introduction
Vegetables are edible plants with nutrient reserves in leaves, roots, steams, and fruits that provide essential minerals and vitamins for a healthy life [1]. Vegetables are a trendy food among consumers due to their importance in the human diet and their provision of essential nutrients, including fiber, vitamins, minerals, proteins, and carbohydrates, as well as their antioxidative effects. These nutrients are necessary for human health and can help lower the risk of chronic diseases [2-4]. However, several studies have found that vegetables are susceptible to contamination with potentially toxic elements (PTEs) [3,5,6]. PTEs are significant contaminants that can enter the environment through the application of pesticides and chemical fertilizers, mining, and irrigation water are the main sources of PTEs in agricultural produce [7-9]. Studies conducted in Nigeria and other parts of the world have reported significant concentrations of PTEs in different vegetables [2,3,10-13].
The consumption of these PTE contaminated vegetables is considered an important route of exposure and can lead to various illnesses in consumers [14-17]. PTEs pose significant health risks to humans as they can enter the body through the food chain [9]. Food contamination with PTEs can cause the accumulation of PTEs in the kidneys and livers of individuals, interfering with numerous biochemical processes that can result in diseases of the heart, brain, kidneys, and bones [18-20]. For example, exposure to Cd can lead to cancer and other harmful health effects, such as harm to the testicles, brain, liver, lung, and blood system [21-25]. Copper causes anemia, metabolic problems, liver and kidney damage, and stomach pain [26,27]. Lead (Pb) affects the nervous system, particularly resulting in deficiencies in the intelligence quotient (IQ) in children [9,28,29]. Therefore, it is important to investigate PTE contamination in vegetables and evaluate the harm to human health.
However, several studies have found that vegetables are susceptible to contamination with PTEs in Nigeria and other parts of the world have reported significant concentrations of PTEs in different vegetables [2,3,30-35]. However, limited or no studies have been reported on the carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk assessments of the PTE on the studied vegetables from the study area. Hence, it is important to determine PTE contamination and evaluate the health risk of PTEs in vegetables to assess the safety of the vegetables consumed. The aim of this study was to determine the concentrations of PTEs in vegetables sold in Gombe markets, Nigeria and to assess the health risks associated with the consumption of these vegetable samples.
Materials and Methods
Study Area
The study was conducted in the old and main markets within the Gombe metropolis, the capital of Gombe State in northern Nigeria (Fig. 1). The markets in the metropolis draw regional items from the farming and business sectors in the surrounding districts. The metropolis spans an area of roughly 52 km² and is located between latitudes 10°17′05.88''N and 11°10′36.78''E. The study area was characterized by two distinct wet and dry seasons: May-October and November-April, respectively. The research region has a tropical climate. The meteorological parameters include an annual temperature range of 18.5-39°C, an average precipitation of 903 mm, and a relative humidity that varies from 15% to 20% in December to 70% to 80% in August [36].
Figure 1.
A map of the study area showing sample points.
Sample collection, preparation, and analysis
Five vegetables: green beans (Pisum sativum), spinach (Amaranthus hybridus), green pepper (Capsicum annuum), carrots (Daucus carota subsp. sativus), and onion (Allium cepa) were purchased at random from three major vendors at the main and old markets (grown locally). A total of 90 samples, consisting of six samples for each of the five vegetables, were collected three times over the course of a month. The samples were obtained from both the main market and the old market and were analyzed for PTE concentrations. The vegetable samples were placed in polybags and transported to the laboratory. The samples were dried in an oven at 80 °C for 2 to 3 days, and their weight was periodically checked until it reached a constant value. The dried samples were first pulverized using a mortar and pestle until they became a fine powder. The sample powder was then sifted through a 2 mm filter and finally sealed in polythene bags.
Approximately 1.0 g of each dried vegetable sample was measured and placed into the digestion flasks. Then, 5 mL of H2SO4 and 15 mL of HNO3 were added. In addition, a blank sample was produced in the same way. The flasks were placed on an electric hot plate and heated at 80 to 90 °C for 2 h. The samples were boiled until a clear solution was achieved [3]. The digest was allowed to cool and filtered using Whatman' No. 42. The resulting solutions were then topped up to 50 mL with deionized water and analyzed for the PTE concentration using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS model AA320N, Wincom Coy Ltd., China).
Quality assurance
All reagents used were of analytical grade, and quality control procedures were implemented to ensure the validity of the study results. For the recovery investigation, the concentrations of PTEs in both the spiked and unspiked samples were measured in triplicate. A blank solution was analyzed in triplicate to determine the quantification and detection limits of AAS. The conditions of the operations are summarized in Table 1. The detection limit (LOD) for each PTE was evaluated as follows: LOD = 3.3 standard deviation (SD)/b [37]. The mean recovery of the PTEs ranged from 93% to 114%, and the limits of detection for Cd, Fe, Ni, Cr, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Co were 0.001, 0.008, 0.005, 0.008, 0.010, 0.007, 0.008, 0.004, and mg/L, respectively.
Table 1.
Operation conditions of AAS for the analysis of the potentially toxic elements.
| Elements | λ (nm) | Slit (nm) | Flame type | Lamp current (mA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 228.8 | 0.7 | Air-acetylene | 8 |
| Fe | 248.3 | 0.2 | Air-acetylene | 10 |
| Cr | 357.9 | 0.7 | Air-acetylene | 10 |
| Pb | 283.3 | 0.7 | Air-acetylene | 10 |
| Cu | 324.7 | 0.7 | Air-acetylene | 10 |
| Zn | 213.9 | 0.7 | Air-acetylene | 10 |
| Co | 193.7 | 0.2 | Air-acetylene | 10 |
| Ni | 232.0 | 0.2 | Air-acetylene | 10 |
Data analysis
Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and the obtained mean values were compared with the permissible limit, and inferential statistics (Duncan, Person correlation, and principal components analysis) were used to measure the relationship and possible sources of the investigated PTEs using SPSS version 25.
Health risk assessment
Health risk assessment involves assessing data related to human health [27,38] and provides useful information about exposure to contaminants. The risk exposure of PTEs is estimated via oral, inhalation, and dermal contact, but the exposure assessment carried out in this study is via oral exposure for children and adults were used in this study.
To evaluate the potential health hazards associated with the prolonged consumption of PTE contaminated vegetables, the estimated daily intake (EDI) of PTEs was calculated using the USEPA model and data from previous studies [2,4,12,32], with the equation 1 below.
| (1) |
The hazard quotient (HQ) of the PTEs in the vegetables was used to estimate the non-carcinogenic health risk.
| (2) |
For any PTE under investigation, the hazard index (HI) is the sum of the HQ values. If the value of HI <1, there are no probable non-carcinogenic consequences [27].
| (3) |
The carcinogenic risk (CR) is estimated by evaluating the likelihood of developing cancer over a lifetime. The estimation is calculated using the equation provided below.
| (4) |
A CR greater than 1 × 10⁻⁴ is considered unacceptable, risks less than 1 × 10⁻⁶ are considered to pose no major health hazards, and risks falling within the safe range are those between 1 × 10⁻⁴ and 1 × 10⁻⁶. where EDI = estimated daily intake dose of PTEs, HQ = hazard quotient, HI = hazard index, RfD = reference dose, and CSF = cancer slope factor. The meaning and units of all variables used in the equations are presented in Table 2 and S1 (in the supplementary information).
Table 2.
The parameters and input assumptions for exposure assessment of elements via ingestion routes.
| Parameters | Meaning | Units | Value |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non Cancer |
Cancer |
||||
| Adults | Children | ||||
| C | Measured elements concentration | mg/kg | |||
| IRing | Daily consumption rate | mg/day | 0.75 | 0.25 | |
| BW | Body weight | kg | 70 | 15 | |
| EF | Exposure frequency | days/year | 365 | 365 | |
| ED | Exposure duration | years | 24 | 6 | 70 |
| ATnc | Average time for non-carcinogens | days | ED × 365 days | ED × 365 days | |
| ATc | Average time for carcinogens | days | ED × 365 days | ED × 365 days | 70 × 365 days |
Results and Discussion
Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) concentrations in vegetables
Tables 3 and 4 present the mean concentrations of PTEs in vegetable samples from the Gombe markets in northern Nigeria. The mean concentrations of PTEs in the vegetable samples ranged from 0.006 - 0.021 mg·kg-1, 2.27 - 12.32 mg·kg-1, 0.05 - 0.150 mg·kg-1, 0.087 - 0.254 mg·kg-1, 0.035 - 0.062 mg·kg-1, 2.65 - 15.61 mg·kg-1, 0.010 - 0.050 mg·kg-1, and 0.012 - 0.058 mg·kg-1 for Cd, Fe, Cr, Pb, Cu, Zn, Co, and Ni, respectively, in the vegetable samples. The mean PTE concentrations showed the following trend: Zn > Fe > Cu > Cr > Ni > Co > Pb > Cd.
Table 3.
Descriptive statistics of potentially toxic elements (mg·kg-1) in vegetable samples from the main market.
| Vegetables | Statistic | Cd | Fe | Cr | Pb | Cu | Zn | Co | Ni |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green beans | Min. | 0.005 | 10.530 | 0.020 | 0.083 | 0.051 | 10.050 | 0.011 | 0.011 |
| Max | 0.009 | 11.380 | 0.080 | 0.090 | 0.060 | 11.000 | 0.013 | 0.013 | |
| Mean | 0.007 | 10.955 | 0.050 | 0.087 | 0.056 | 10.525 | 0.012 | 0.012 | |
| SD | 0.003 | 0.601 | 0.042 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.672 | 0.001 | 0.001 | |
| Spinach | Min. | 0.009 | 9.050 | 0.051 | 0.090 | 0.030 | 9.980 | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Max | 0.010 | 10.370 | 0.080 | 0.135 | 0.040 | 11.340 | 0.012 | 0.023 | |
| Mean | 0.010 | 9.710 | 0.066 | 0.113 | 0.035 | 10.660 | 0.011 | 0.019 | |
| SD | 0.001 | 0.933 | 0.021 | 0.032 | 0.007 | 0.962 | 0.002 | 0.006 | |
| Green pepper | Min. | 0.008 | 7.020 | 0.110 | 0.210 | 0.046 | 6.830 | 0.008 | 0.020 |
| Max | 0.010 | 8.010 | 0.130 | 0.230 | 0.051 | 7.870 | 0.018 | 0.031 | |
| Mean | 0.009 | 7.515 | 0.120 | 0.220 | 0.049 | 7.350 | 0.013 | 0.026 | |
| SD | 0.001 | 0.700 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.735 | 0.007 | 0.008 | |
| Carrot | Min. | 0.003 | 8.530 | 0.110 | 0.115 | 0.038 | 4.080 | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Max | 0.008 | 10.310 | 0.170 | 0.150 | 0.053 | 5.310 | 0.018 | 0.060 | |
| Mean | 0.006 | 9.420 | 0.140 | 0.133 | 0.046 | 4.695 | 0.012 | 0.037 | |
| SD | 0.004 | 1.259 | 0.042 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.870 | 0.009 | 0.033 | |
| Onion | Min. | 0.006 | 3.230 | 0.090 | 0.089 | 0.043 | 3.890 | 0.006 | 0.025 |
| Max | 0.009 | 5.380 | 0.110 | 0.123 | 0.054 | 4.530 | 0.019 | 0.033 | |
| Mean | 0.008 | 4.305 | 0.100 | 0.106 | 0.049 | 4.210 | 0.013 | 0.029 | |
| SD | 0.002 | 1.520 | 0.014 | 0.024 | 0.008 | 0.453 | 0.009 | 0.006 | |
| WHO/FAO (2007) | 0.2 | 450 | 5 | 0.3 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 10 | |
WHO/FAO values represent the maximum permissible limit of PTEs in the vegetables.
Table 4.
Descriptive statistics of potentially toxic elements (mg·kg-1) in vegetable samples from the old Market.
| Vegetables | Statistic | Cd | Fe | Cr | Pb | Cu | Zn | Co | Ni |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green beans | Min. | 0.009 | 11.830 | 0.025 | 0.090 | 0.050 | 2.560 | 0.015 | 0.019 |
| Max | 0.011 | 12.810 | 0.092 | 0.110 | 0.061 | 2.740 | 0.018 | 0.020 | |
| Mean | 0.010 | 12.320 | 0.059 | 0.100 | 0.056 | 2.650 | 0.017 | 0.020 | |
| SD | 0.001 | 0.693 | 0.047 | 0.014 | 0.008 | 0.127 | 0.002 | 0.001 | |
| Spinach | Min. | 0.008 | 8.980 | 0.058 | 0.150 | 0.030 | 15.370 | 0.009 | 0.023 |
| Max | 0.012 | 10.530 | 0.084 | 0.170 | 0.050 | 15.850 | 0.011 | 0.027 | |
| Mean | 0.010 | 9.755 | 0.071 | 0.160 | 0.040 | 15.610 | 0.010 | 0.025 | |
| SD | 0.003 | 1.096 | 0.018 | 0.014 | 0.014 | 0.339 | 0.001 | 0.003 | |
| Green pepper | Min. | 0.010 | 2.090 | 0.101 | 0.190 | 0.053 | 11.580 | 0.048 | 0.019 |
| Max | 0.011 | 2.450 | 0.130 | 0.230 | 0.061 | 12.830 | 0.050 | 0.023 | |
| Mean | 0.011 | 2.270 | 0.116 | 0.210 | 0.057 | 12.205 | 0.049 | 0.021 | |
| SD | 0.001 | 0.255 | 0.021 | 0.028 | 0.006 | 0.884 | 0.001 | 0.003 | |
| Carrot | Min. | 0.013 | 8.990 | 0.130 | 0.228 | 0.059 | 10.550 | 0.011 | 0.056 |
| Max | 0.020 | 11.000 | 0.170 | 0.280 | 0.065 | 11.080 | 0.017 | 0.060 | |
| Mean | 0.017 | 9.995 | 0.150 | 0.254 | 0.062 | 10.815 | 0.014 | 0.058 | |
| SD | 0.005 | 1.421 | 0.028 | 0.037 | 0.004 | 0.375 | 0.004 | 0.003 | |
| Onion | Min. | 0.019 | 9.530 | 0.110 | 0.150 | 0.051 | 3.530 | 0.043 | 0.048 |
| Max | 0.023 | 10.350 | 0.140 | 0.190 | 0.058 | 5.350 | 0.057 | 0.051 | |
| Mean | 0.021 | 9.940 | 0.125 | 0.170 | 0.055 | 4.440 | 0.050 | 0.050 | |
| SD | 0.003 | 0.580 | 0.021 | 0.028 | 0.005 | 1.287 | 0.010 | 0.002 | |
| WHO/FAO (2007) | 0.2 | 450 | 5 | 0.3 | 40 | 50 | 50 | 10 | |
WHO/FAO values represent the maximum permissible limit of PTEs in the vegetables.
The mean concentration of Cd in this study was 17.90% - 19.40% lower than the permissible limit of 0.2 mg·kg-1 [39]. However, the mean Cd concentration determined in onion (0.021 ± 0.003 mg·kg-1) and carrot (0.017 ± 0.005 mg·kg-1) from the old market was higher (p < 0.05) than those from the main market. This may be attributed to the cultivation of vegetables in contaminated soil or the excessive application of chemical fertilizers [40,41]. Moreover, the Cd levels in green beans, spinach, and green pepper were not significantly different (p < 0.05). In contrast, the mean Cd concentrations of 0.30 mg·kg-1 (spinach) and 0.05 mg·kg-1 (onion), 0.20 mg·kg-1 (pepper), and 0.05 mg·kg-1 (leafy vegetables), reported by Zarei et al. [41], Abubakar et al. [33], and Moa et al. [4], respectively, were higher than those obtained in this study. It has been reported that even a low level of exposure to Cd can cause hearing and vision loss and be detrimental to the kidneys, liver, skeletal system, and cardiovascular system [23,26,43,44].
The highest Fe concentration was obtained in amaranth (12.320 ± 0.693 mg·kg-1) from the old market (Table 4). The concentration of Fe in various vegetables was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those from the main market, except for spinach. This may be attributed to the use of irrigation water containing suspended Fr-rich sediments, which can enhance Fe accumulation in plants. Similarly, Taiwo et al. [1] measured high concentrations of Fe in spinach samples from southwestern Nigeria. It has been reported that Fe is one of the most abundant elements in Nigerian soil [45], which can result in high uptake and accumulation in the vegetables. It has been reported that spinach naturally accumulates high levels of Fe due to its physiological characteristics [46]. However, the Fe concentrations obtained in the study were 885% - 358,668% lower than those reported previously [12,31,33]. On the other hand, the values obtained were 548% - 785% higher than those reported by Ametepey et al. [2] and Lere et al. [43]. Iron is an essential element that plays a significant role in an organism’s metabolism [47]. However, elevated intake of Fe can result in gastrointestinal issues such as cramping and bleeding and have a negative impact on the metabolic processes and cardiovascular systems [47,48].
Chromium is essential for regulating the metabolism of nucleic acids, carbohydrates, and lipoproteins, as well as the enhancing the insulin action for glucose metabolism [49,50]. However, Cr is a biogenic microelement in the form of Cr (III). In contrast, Cr (VI) is highly toxic and carcinogenic to humans [51,52]. Moreover, excessive intake of Cr can lead to cardiovascular disorders, reduced blood glucose levels, and digestive problems [53]. In addition, long-term consumption of Cr has been associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal cancer [54,56]. Fortunately, the concentration of Cr in the samples examined was found to be within the permissible limit of 5 mg·kg-1 [39]. The shighest concentration of Cr was observed in amaranth (0.150 ± 0.028 mg·kg-1) from the old market (Table 4). Furthermore, the levels of Cr in green beans, onions, carrots, spinach, and green pepper were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05). The old market environments are frequently exposed to vehicular emissions and dust, which can settle on the vegetables surface and contribute to elevated Cr concentrations. In a study conducted by Ametepey et al. in Tamale Metropolis, Ghana, the concentration of Cr in vegetables ranged from 0.03-0.64 mg·kg-1 [2]. Moreover, the mean concentrations of Cr reported by Ashraf et al. [31], Bambara et al. [57], Najmi et al. [17], and Osae et al. [12] were 0.41 - 0.67 mg·kg-1, 4.00 mg·kg-1, 0.22 - 4.46 mg·kg-1, and 1.49 - 17.42 mg·kg-1, respectively, which exceeded the values obtained in this study.
The mean concentrations of Pb, Cu, Zn, and Co were below the permissible limits of 0.3 mg·kg-1, 40 mg·kg-1, 50 mg·kg-1, and 50 mg·kg-1, respectively [39]. The vegetable may have grown in minimally contaminated soil, reducing element accumulation and phytotoxicity risk, which also minimizes exposure through consumption of the vegetable samples. However, there were significant differences (p < 0.05) in the levels of Pb, Zn, and Co in amaranth, onion, carrot, spinach, and green beans. Copper content, on the other hand, was generally higher in vegetables from the old market, with no significant difference (p < 0.05) observed in the content in green bean, onion, carrot, spinach, and green pepper samples between the two markets. In comparison to previous studies, Ametepey et al. [2] and Fabiano et al. [57] were consistent with the results of our study. However, the values reported by Ashraf et al. [31], Lere et al. [45], Gupta et al. [32], Najimi et al. [17], and Bambara et al. [53] were 19.60% - 1,126% higher than the findings in this study. Lead has detrimental effects on the nervous system, particularly causing IQ deficiencies in children [19,27,28]. Furthermore, the concentrations of Cu, Zn, and Co in this study were notably lower than the values reported by Ashraf et al. [31], Najmi et al. [17], and Adhikari et al. [34], with differences ranging from 158.8% - 4,645.8%, 475% - 22,303%, and 6% - 632%, respectively.
Nickel (Ni) plays a vital role as an activator of the enzyme urease, making it a vital micronutrient for plants [57]. However, high concentrations of Ni can have negative effects on seed germination and overall plant growth, including the growth of roots, shoots, biomass, and final production [59]. In this study, the highest average Ni concentration was observed in carrots (0.058 ± 0.003 mg·kg-1) from the old market (Table 3). In addition, the levels of Cr in green beans, carrots, spinach, green pepper, and onions varied significantly (p < 0.05). A previous study has shown that vegetables have lower levels of Ni contamination [12,31,32,56]. In fact, the concentration of Ni in the samples studied was below the permissible limit of 10 mg·kg-1 [39]. Similarly, Ashraf et al. [31] reported low Ni concentrations ranging from 1.36 - 3.12 mg·kg-1. Furthermore, other studies by Gupta et al. [32], Osae et al. [12], and Bambara et al. [56] reported mean Ni concentrations of 0.54 - 0.89 mg·kg-1, 8.82 mg·kg-1, and 0.38 - 6.5 mg·kg-1, respectively. However, Adhikari et al. [34] found significantly higher mean Ni concentrations ranging from 8.00 - 198.71 mg·kg-1, exceeding the permissible limit of 10 mg·kg-1 [39]. The observed Ni levels may be associated with the application of phosphate fertilizers, which are recognized s major sources of Ni to agricultural soil, along with other potential sources such as wastewater irrigation, and industrial emissions that can further enhance Ni accumulation in vegetables.
Source identification of PTEs in vegetables
Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to determine the interrelationships between the PTEs in the vegetable samples, and the results are presented in Table 5. Most element pairs demonstrated strong positive correlations (r > 0.6), including Pb-Cr, Cu-Cd, Co-Cr, and Ni-Cr (p < 0.001). Additionally, the Co-Pb, Ni-Pb, and Ni-Co pairs showed a significant correlation at p < 0.05. The strong positive correlation coefficient among the PTEs indicates a similar source and nearly identical PTE accumulation in the samples.
Table 5.
Correlation analysis for the potentially toxic elements in the vegetable samples.
| Elements | Cd | Fe | Cr | Pb | Cu | Zn | Co | Ni |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | 1 | |||||||
| Fe | 0.133 | 1 | ||||||
| Cr | 0.513 | -0.284 | 1 | |||||
| Pb | 0.342 | -0.483 | .653a | 1 | ||||
| Cu | .705a | 0.099 | 0.183 | -0.044 | 1 | |||
| Zn | -0.328 | -0.461 | 0.074 | 0.478 | -0.365 | 1 | ||
| Co | 0.342 | -0.483 | .653a | 1.000b | -0.044 | 0.478 | 1 | |
| Ni | 0.342 | -0.483 | .653a | 1.000b | -0.044 | 0.478 | 1.000b | 1 |
Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).;
Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
The results of the principal components analysis (PCA) are presented in Table 6 and Fig. 2. The results identified two principal components (PC) with a total cumulative variance of 92.603% of the source analysis for the various PTEs in the samples. PC1 shows a significant correlation between Cr, Pb, Zn, Co, and Ni, with a total variance of 51.781%. PC2 was correlated with Cd and Cu, with a total variance of 27.033%. The sources of PC1 and PC2 are considered to be a combination of fertilizer application and other anthropogenic activities, such as industrial pollution and vehicle emissions.
Table 6.
Principal component analysis of PTEs in the vegetable samples.
| Elements | Component |
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| Cd | 0.321 | 0.896 |
| Fe | -0.593 | 0.336 |
| Cr | 0.715 | 0.397 |
| Pb | 0.980 | 0.030 |
| Cu | -0.034 | 0.831 |
| Zn | 0.540 | -0.628 |
| Co | 0.980 | 0.030 |
| Ni | 0.980 | 0.030 |
| Eigenvalues | 4.142 | 2.163 |
| % of Variance | 51.781 | 27.033 |
| Cumulative % | 51.781 | 78.814 |
Figure 2.

Rotated component loading plot of component analysis of PTEs of vegetable samples.
Health risk assessment
The USEPA has implemented health risk parameters, including carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks, to assess the potential health risks associated with prolonged exposure to elements [31]. Tables S2 and S3, and S4 and S5 present the values of EDI and CDI for non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks, respectively. The EDI values of Cd, Fe, Cr, Pb, Cu, Zn, Co, and Ni were below their respective oral RfD values of 0.001, 0.07, 0.003, 0.004, 0.035, 0.04, 0.02, and 0.02 mg·kg-1day-1, respectively [32,56]. The EDI values of the elements obtained are comparable with those of similar studies previously reported by Ametepey et al. [2] and Gupta et al. [32], but lower than those reported by Ashraf et al. [31]; Manwani et al. [10], Bambara et al. [56], and Fabiano et al. [57].
Additionally, the HQs and HIs of the PTEs in vegetables are presented in Tables 7 and 8. The HQ values for both children and adults are ranked in the following order: Pb > Zn > Cr > Fe > Cd > Ni > Co > Cu for the main market, and Pb > Cr > Zn > Fe > Cd > Ni > Co > Cu for the old market, in both children and adults. The hazard quotient (HQ) was used to evaluate the samples' non-carcinogenic risk in both adults and children. In all the investigated samples, the HQ values for each PTE monitored in the samples were <1. The values of HI in the studied samples ranged from 4.06×10-05 - 2.07×10-03.
Table 7.
Target hazard quotient (THQ) and hazard index (HI) of PTEs in vegetables from the main market.
| Vegetables | Age group | HQ |
HI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Fe | Cr | Pb | Cu | Zn | Co | Ni | |||
| Green beans | Children | 4.67 × 10-05 | 1.04 × 10-04 | 1.11 × 10-04 | 1.66 × 10-04 | 9.33 × 10-07 | 2.34 × 10-04 | 4.00 × 10-06 | 1.42 × 10-06 | 1.19 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 2.08 × 10-05 | 4.47 × 10-05 | 4.77 × 10-05 | 7.11 × 10-05 | 4.00 × 10-07 | 1.00 × 10-04 | 1.72 × 10-06 | 6.35 × 10-06 | 5.02 × 10-04 | |
| Spinach | Children | 6.67 × 10-05 | 9.24 × 10-05 | 1.47 × 10-04 | 2.15 × 10-04 | 5.83 × 10-07 | 2.37 × 10-04 | 3.67 × 10-06 | 2.72 × 10-06 | 1.27 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 2.86 × 10-05 | 3.96 × 10-05 | 6.23 × 10-05 | 9.23 × 10-04 | 2.50 × 10-07 | 1.02 × 10-04 | 1.57 × 10-06 | 6.35 × 10-06 | 2.26 × 10-03 | |
| Green pepper | Children | 6.00 × 10-05 | 7.16 × 10-05 | 2.67 × 10-05 | 4.20 × 10-04 | 8.15 × 10-07 | 1.63 × 10-04 | 4.33 × 10-06 | 3.72 × 10-06 | 1.37 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 2.57 × 10-05 | 3.07 × 10-05 | 1.14 × 10-05 | 1.80 × 10-04 | 3.50 × 10-07 | 7.05 × 10-05 | 1.86 × 10-06 | 8.65 × 10-06 | 6.02 × 10-04 | |
| Carrot | Children | 4.00 × 10-05 | 8.97 × 10-05 | 3.11 × 10-04 | 2.53 × 10-04 | 7.18 × 10-07 | 1.04 × 10-04 | 4.00 × 10-06 | 5.30 × 10-06 | 1.49 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 1.71 × 10-05 | 3.84 × 10-05 | 1.33 × 10-05 | 1.09 × 10-04 | 3.28 × 10-07 | 4.47 × 10-05 | 1.72 × 10-06 | 1.24 × 10-06 | 3.96 × 10-04 | |
| Onion | Children | 5.33 × 10-05 | 3.67 × 10-05 | 2.22 × 10-04 | 2.02 × 10-04 | 8.18 × 10-07 | 9.37 × 10-05 | 4.33 × 10-06 | 4.15 × 10-06 | 1.14 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 2.29 × 10-05 | 1.76 × 10-05 | 9.53 × 10-05 | 8.66 × 10-04 | 3.50 × 10-07 | 4.00 × 10-05 | 1.86 × 10-06 | 9.65 × 10-06 | 2.07 × 10-03 | |
Table 8.
Target hazard quotient (THQ) and hazard index (HI) of PTEs in vegetables from the old market.
| Vegetables | Age group | HQ |
HI | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Fe | Cr | Pb | Cu | Zn | Co | Ni | |||
| Green beans | Children | 6.67 × 10-05 | 1.17 × 10-04 | 1.31 × 10-04 | 1.91 × 10-04 | 9.33 × 10-07 | 5.90 × 10-05 | 5.65 × 10-06 | 2.86 × 10-06 | 9.65 × 10-04 |
| Adults | 2.86 × 10-05 | 5.03 × 10-05 | 5.63 × 10-05 | 8.17 × 10-05 | 4.00 × 10-07 | 2.52 × 10-05 | 2.44 × 10-06 | 6.65 × 10-06 | 4.24 × 10-04 | |
| Spinach | Children | 6.67 × 10-05 | 8.56 × 10-05 | 1.58 × 10-04 | 3.06 × 10-04 | 6.68 × 10-07 | 3.47 × 10-05 | 3.34 × 10-06 | 3.57 × 10-06 | 1.16 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 2.86 × 10-05 | 3.99 × 10-05 | 6.77 × 10-05 | 1.31 × 10-04 | 2.85 × 10-07 | 1.49 × 10-05 | 1.43 × 10-06 | 8.35 × 10-06 | 5.16 × 10-04 | |
| Green pepper | Children | 7.33 × 10-05 | 2.16 × 10-05 | 2.58 × 10-04 | 4.04 × 10-04 | 9.50 × 10-07 | 2.71 × 10-04 | 1.14 × 10-05 | 3.00 × 10-06 | 4.13 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 3.14 × 10-05 | 9.27 × 10-06 | 1.10 × 10-04 | 1.71 × 10-04 | 4.08 × 10-07 | 1.49 × 10-05 | 7.00 × 10-06 | 7.00 × 10-06 | 6.61 × 10-04 | |
| Carrot | Children | 1.13 × 10-04 | 9.51 × 10-05 | 3.33 × 10-04 | 2.07 × 10-04 | 1.03 × 10-07 | 2.40 × 10-04 | 4.67 × 10-06 | 8.30 × 10-06 | 1.79 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 4.86 × 10-05 | 4.09 × 10-05 | 1.43 × 10-04 | 3.33 × 10-05 | 4.43 × 10-07 | 1.49 × 10-05 | 2.00 × 10-06 | 1.84 × 10-05 | 5.14 × 10-04 | |
| Onion | Children | 1.40 × 10-04 | 9.47 × 10-05 | 2.78 × 10-04 | 1.39 × 10-04 | 9.23 × 10-07 | 9.87 × 10-05 | 1.80 × 10-06 | 7.15 × 10-06 | 1.29 × 10-03 |
| Adults | 6.00 × 10-05 | 4.06 × 10-05 | 1.19 × 10-04 | 2.78 × 10-04 | 3.93 × 10-07 | 4.23 × 10-05 | 7.15 × 10-04 | 1.67 × 10-05 | 4.06 × 10-05 | |
These HI values were all below 1, suggesting no probable non-carcinogenic adverse health risks. Conversely, children were more susceptible to PTE contamination than adults.
The estimates for the CR of the PTEs studied in children and adults are presented in Table 9. For children, the CR values ranged from 9.91 × 10-09 - 5.62 × 10-6, while for adults they ranged from 9.16 × 10-10 - 3.28 × 10-6 in the main market, and 4.77 × 10-8 - 6.03 × 10-6 in children, while for adults the range was from 5.92 × 10-9 - 3.51 × 10-6 in the old market. The examined PTEs in this study for children and adults were found to be lower than the threshold value of 1 × 10-6 – 1 × 10-4, suggesting that the risk of cancer development is unlikely to occur. However, monitoring of PTEs on foodstuffs to reduce the impact of bioaccumulation and protect public health. The contribution to cancer by the investigated PTEs in the vegetable samples is shown in Figs. 3 and 4. The contribution of individual PTEs to HI (Fig. 3) and CR (Fig. 4) were calculated by expressing HI and CR value of each element as a percentage for each vegetable. Chromium makes the highest fraction of the CR in carrot, onion and green pepper from both old and main markets for children. Cr constituted of 25.76% - 94.92%, Pb contributed about 9.05% - 25.66%. The Cd and Ni contributed a lower fraction of around 0.53% - 65.00% and 0.04% - 1.14%, respectively. Notable differences in contribution between main and old markets samples were observed. For instance, Cr was generally higher in vegetables from the old market compared with main market. These differences may be attributed to environmental and anthropogenic factors such as the use of wastewater for irrigation, phosphate fertilizer application, or atmospheric deposition from vehicular emissions, which are more pronounced around the old market. Post-harvest handling and storage conditions, which differ between the two markets, may also play a role in influencing the observed variations . The CR values obtained in our study are consistent with the trends reported in a previous study reported by Abubakar et al. [33] and Said et al. [60], but lower than the values reported by Taiwo et al. [1], Ashraf et al. [31], Manwani et al. [10], Bambara et al. [56], and Adhikari et al. [34].
Table 9.
Cancer risk (CR) of PTEs in vegetables from main and old markets.
| Vegetables | Age group | Main market (CR) |
Old market (CR) |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cd | Pb | Cr | Ni | Cd | Pb | Cr | Ni | ||
| Green beans | Children | 4.18×10-08 | 7.24×10-07 | 2.01×10-06 | 9.91×10-09 | 5.98×10-06 | 8.33×10-07 | 2.37×10-06 | 1.65×10-08 |
| Adults | 2.44×10-08 | 4.22×10-07 | 1.17×10-06 | 5.76×10-09 | 3.48×10-08 | 4.85×10-07 | 1.38×10-06 | 1.18×10-08 | |
| Spinach | Children | 5.98×10-08 | 9.44×10-07 | 2.65×10-06 | 1.56×10-08 | 5.98×10-06 | 1.33×10-06 | 2.85×10-06 | 2.06×10-08 |
| Adults | 3.48×10-08 | 5.47×10-07 | 1.55×10-06 | 9.16×10-10 | 3.48×10-08 | 7.77×10-07 | 1.71×10-06 | 1.20×10-08 | |
| Green pepper | Children | 5.38×10-08 | 1.84×10-07 | 4.84×10-06 | 2.14×10-08 | 6.69×10-06 | 1.75×10-06 | 4.67×10-06 | 1.73×10-08 |
| Adults | 3.14×10-08 | 1.07×10-07 | 2.81×10-06 | 1.25×10-08 | 3.84×10-08 | 1.02×10-06 | 2.72×10-06 | 1.01×10-08 | |
| Carrot | Children | 3.59×10-08 | 1.11×10-07 | 5.62×10-06 | 3.04×10-08 | 1.02×10-07 | 2.12×10-06 | 6.03×10-06 | 4.77×10-08 |
| Adults | 2.09×10-08 | 6.46×10-07 | 3.28×10-06 | 1.77×10-08 | 5.92×10-09 | 1.23×10-06 | 3.51×10-06 | 2.78×10-08 | |
| Onion | Children | 4.18×10-08 | 7.24×10-07 | 2.01×10-06 | 9.91×10-09 | 5.98×10-06 | 8.33×10-07 | 2.37×10-06 | 1.65×10-08 |
| Adults | 2.44×10-08 | 4.22×10-07 | 1.17×10-06 | 5.76×10-09 | 3.48×10-08 | 4.85×10-07 | 1.38×10-06 | 1.18×10-08 | |
Figure 3.
Contribution of cancer risk by PTEs in vegetables from main market.
Figure 4.
Contribution of cancer risk by PTEs in vegetables from old market.
Conclusions
This study determined the concentration and assessed the health risk associated with PTEs (Cd, Fe, Cr, Pb, Cu, Zn, Co, and Ni) in vegetables sold in markets in Gombe, Northern Nigeria. The results revealed that the mean concentrations of Pb, Cu, Zn, and Co were below the permissible limits set by the FAO/WHO. The concentration treads followed the order: Zn > Fe > Cu > Cr > Ni > Co > Pb > Cd, with Zn and Fe being the most abundant elements among the investigated PTEs. The health risk assessment showed that both non-carcinogenic (HI < 1) and carcinogenic health risks for children and adults were lower than the threshold value of 1 × 10-6 - 1 × 10-4, suggesting no probable non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks. However, children showed higher susceptibility to the potential risks than adults. Despite the negligible current risk, the potential for bioaccumulation and long-term exposure underscores the need to continually monitor the vegetables being sold in the market to ensure that only wholesome and safe vegetables are available for human consumption.
These findings make a significant contribution to health and food safety research by bridging a key knowledge gap in Northern Nigeria, particularly in Gombe State, where there is limited assessment of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks associated with PTEs in the vegetables, advancing knowledge on food safety, risk communication and offering data for regulation decision-making and public health policy. However, the study was limited to PTEs in vegetable samples from markets in the Gombe metropolis, and no speciation study was conducted. We recommend that future work include multi-seasonal motoring across urban and rural markets and to evaluate the chemical speciation.
Footnotes
Acknowledgement
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.~
Conflict of interest
Please state any conflict of interest.
CRediT author statement
All authors contributed equally to the study design and conception. MBS: Methodology, investigation, analysis, original draft preparation; AUM : conceptualization, review & editing; ABR: software, data curation; IAM: visualization, review & editing; ATF: review & editing, TIU: recourses, review & editing, and AMB: supervision review & editing; all authors reviewed the manuscript and approved its final version.
Supplementary Material
This material is available online at www.eaht.org.
The parameters and input assumptions for exposure assessment of metals via ingestion routes.
Estimated daily intakes (EDI) of the PTEs in the in vegetable samples from main market.
Estimated daily intakes (EDI) of the PTEs in the in vegetable samples from old market.
Chronic daily intake (CDI) and cancer slope factor (CSF) of PTEs in the in vegetable samples from main market.
Chronic daily intake (CDI) and cancer slope factor (CSF) of PTEs in the in vegetable samples from old market.
References
- 1.Taiwo AM, Adekola MB, Olatunde KA, Abdullahi KL, Ogunkoya PK, Lawal ER, et al. Human health risk assessment of essential and non-essential metals in vegetables (Jute Mallow, Onions, Celosia, Spinach and Tomatoes) from Ogun, Lagos and Oyo states, southwestern Nigeria. Vegetos. 2021;34:390–403. doi: 10.1007/s42535-021-00217-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ametepey ST, Cobbina SJ, Akpabey FJ, Duwiejuah AB, Abuntori ZN. Health risk assessment and heavy metal contamination levels in vegetables from Tamale Metropolis, Ghana. Int J Food Contam. 2018;5:5. doi: 10.1186/s40550-018-0067-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sulaiman MB, Maigari IA, Yahaya Y. Health risk assessment of heavy metals accumulation in tomatoes irrigation farms at Kwadon, Gombe, Nigeria. ATBU, Journal of Science, Technology & Education. 2019;7(2):271–280. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mao Y, Wang M, Wei H, Gong N, Wang F, Zhu C. Heavy metal pollution and risk assessment of vegetables and soil in Jinhua City of China. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4241. doi: 10.3390/su15054241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maigari AU, Sulaiman MB, Buhari M, Abdullahi AO. Pesticide residues in selected vegetables from Gombe markets, Gombe State, Nigeria: assessing the health impact. Ife Journal of Science. 2021;23(1):77–87. doi: 10.4314/ijs.v23i1.8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sulaiman BA, Sulaiman MB, Ahmed A, Maigari IA, Tijjani AF. Levels of heavy metals in soil, water and vegetables around Industrial area in Bauchi, Northeastern Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 2021;25(8):1527–1533. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v25i8.37. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.El-Radaideh NM, Al-Taani AAA. Geo-environmental study of heavy metals of the agricultural highway soils, NW Jordan. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2018;11:787. doi: 10.1007/s12517-018-4099-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Timothy N, Williams ET. Environmental pollution by heavy metal: An overview. International Journal of Environmental Chemistry. 2019;3(2):72–82. doi: 10.11648/j.ijec.20190302.14. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu P, Zhang Y, Feng N, Zhu M, Tian J. Potentially toxic element (PTE) levels in maize, soil, and irrigation water and health risks through maize consumption in northern Ningxia, China. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1729. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09845-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manwani S, Vanisree CR, Jaiman V, Awasthi KK, Yadav CS, Sankhla MS, et al. Heavy metal contamination in vegetables and their toxic effects on human health. In: Meena VS, Choudhary M, Yadav RP, Meena SM, editots. Sustainable crop production - Recent advances. IntechOpen; 2022. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kouame AK, Nindjin C, Konan GA, Bouatenin MJK, Koussemon M. Chemical risk assessment of conventionally and organically grown tomatoes in Côte d'Ivoire. The North African Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2023;7(16):130–135. doi: 10.51745/najfnr.7.16. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Osae R, Nukpezah D, Darko DA, Koranteng SS, Mensah A. Accumulation of heavy metals and human health risk assessment of vegetable consumption from a farm within the Korle lagoon catchment. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e16005. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hassan J, Rajib MMR, Khan MN, Khandaker S, Zubayer M, Ashab KR, et al. Assessment of heavy metals accumulation by vegetables irrigated with different stages of textile wastewater for evaluation of food and health risk. J Environ Manage. 2024;353:120206. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Verma RK, Sankhla MS, Kumar R. Mercury contamination in water and its impact on public health. International Journal of Forensic Science. 2018;1(2):72–78. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jiang HH, Cai LM, Wen HH, Hu GC, Chen LG, Luo J. An integrated approach to quantifying ecological and human health risks from different sources of soil heavy metals. Sci Total Environ. 2020;701:134466. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pateriya A, Verma RK, Sankhla MS, Kumar R. Heavy metal toxicity in rice and its effects on human health. Letters in Applied NanoBioScience. 2021;10(1):1833–1845. doi: 10.33263/LIANBS101.18331845. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Najmi A, Albratty M, Al-Rajab AJ, Alhazmi HA, Javed SA, Ahsan W, et al. Heavy metal contamination in leafy vegetables grown in Jazan Region of Saudi Arabia: Assessment of possible human health hazards. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):2984. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20042984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Satarug S, Gobe GC, Vesey D, Phelps KR. Cadmium and lead exposure, nephrotoxicity, and mortality. Toxics. 2020;8(4):86. doi: 10.3390/toxics8040086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sulaiman M, Maigari A, Ihedioha J, Lawal R, Gimba A, Shuhaibu A. Levels and health risk assessment of organochlorine pesticide residues in vegetables from Yamaltu area in Gombe, Nigeria. French-Ukrainian Journal of Chemistry. 2021;9(1):19–30. doi: 10.17721/fujcV9I1P19-30. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Obayomi OO, Sulaiman MB, Oluwasola HO, Sulaiman AB, Akpomie KG, Odewole OA, et al. Ecological risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in the bottom sediments of a stream in Oke-Ere, Kogi State, North Central Nigeria. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. 2023;20:13107–13118. doi: 10.1007/s13762-023-04851-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li C, Zhou K, Qin W, Tian C, Qi M, Yan X, et al. A review on heavy metals contamination in soil: Effects, sources, and remediation techniques. Soil Sediment Contam. 2019;28(4):380–394. doi: 10.1080/15320383.2019.1592108. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sulaiman MB, Asegbeloyin JN, Ihedioha JN, Oyeka EE, Oji EO. Trace metals content of soil around a municipal solid waste dumpsite in Gombe, Nigeria: Assessing the ecological and human health impact. J Chem Health Risks. 2019;9(3):173–190. doi: 10.22034/jchr.2019.668183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alsubih M, El Morabet R, Khan RA, Khan NA, Khan MUH, Ahmed S, et al. Occurrence and health risk assessment of arsenic and heavy metals in groundwater of three industrial areas in Delhi, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(44):63017–63031. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Thai VN, Dehbandi R, Fakhri Y, Sarafraz M, Nematolahi A, Dehghani SS, et al. Potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in the fillet of narrow-barred Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus commerson): a global systematic review, meta-analysis and risk assessment. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2021;199(9):3497–3509. doi: 10.1007/s12011-020-02476-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sulaiman MB, Okoye COB, Asegbeloyin JN. Geochemical, ecological, and health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements (PTEs) in the surrounding soil of a cement plant. Discov Environ. 2024;2:34. doi: 10.1007/s44274-024-00053-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Shahkarami S, Goudarzi F, Amiri-Ardekani E, Dehghani S. Heavy metals contamination in two species of medicinal plants in the Iranian market. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2023;103(19):8532–8541. doi: 10.1080/03067319.2021.1990903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sulaiman MB, Adamu AM, Ali SB, Ezenobi UV, Akinlotan OO, et al. Heavy metal contamination in medicinal plants: assessing carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risks. Discov Environ. 2024;2:11. doi: 10.1007/s44274-024-00035-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Flora G, Gupta D, Tiwari A. Toxicity of lead: A review with recent updates. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2012;5(2):47–58. doi: 10.2478/v10102-012-0009-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Collin MS, Venkatraman SK, Vijayakumar N, Kanimozhi V, Arbaaz SM, Stacey RGS. Bioaccumulation of lead (Pb) and its effects on human: A review. J Hazard Mater Adv. 2022;7:100094. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100094. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Isiuku BO, Enyoh CE. Monitoring and modeling of heavy metal contents in vegetables collected from markets in Imo State, Nigeria. Environ Anal Health Toxicol. 2020;35(1):e2020003. doi: 10.5620/eaht.e2020003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ashraf I, Ahmad F, Sharif A, Altaf AR, Teng H. Heavy metals assessment in water, soil, vegetables and their associated health risks via consumption of vegetables, District Kasur, Pakistan. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3:552. doi: 10.1007/s42452-021-04547-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gupta N, Yadav KK, Kumar V, Prasad S, Cabral-Pinto MMS, Jeon BH, et al. Investigation of heavy metal accumulation in vegetables and health risk to humans From their consumption. Front Environ Sci. 2022;10:791052. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.791052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Abubakar AA, Abdullahi M, Albashir Y. Assessing heavy metal contamination risk in selected vegetables marketed in Dutsin-Ma, Katsina State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management. 2023;27(6):1147–1152. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v27i6.13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Adhikari S, Struwig M. Concentrations and health risks of selected elements in leafy vegetables: a comparison between roadside open-air markets and large stores in Johannesburg, South Africa. Environ Monit Assess. 2024;196(2):170. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-12283-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Alegbe PJ, Appiah-Brempong M, Awuah E. Heavy metal contamination in vegetables and associated health risks. Sci Afr. 2025;27:e02603. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sulaiman MB, Maigari AU, Sai'du D. Impact of municipal solid waste dumps on surrounding soil and groundwater in Gombe, Nigeria. Int J Sci Environ Technol. 2016;5(5):3059–3068. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sulaiman MB, Santuraki AH, Gimba AM, Ali SB, Barambu AU. Pollution profile, ecological and health risk assessment of trace metals in soils of auto mechanic workshops at Gombe metropolis, Gombe State, Northeastern Nigeria. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2022;15:1549. doi: 10.1007/s12517-022-10833-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sulaiman MB, Salawu K, Isa Z. Assessment of potential health risks associated with remediated and non-remediated soils at illegal mining compound in Dareta, Zamfara, Nigeria. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2016;3(9):151–160. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35007.71841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations(FAO), World Health Organization (WHO). Food additives and contaminants, joint codex alimentarius commission. [cited Aug 5, 2025]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/input/download/report/27/Al0112Ae.pdf.
- 40.Rahman MA, Rahman MM, Reichman SM, Lim RP, Naidu R. Heavy metals in Australian grown and imported rice and vegetables on sale in Australia: health hazard. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2014;100:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zarei A, Qasemi M, Mardaneh J, Taghavi M, Farhang M, Allahdadi M, et al. Metal(oid)s in vegetables: Human health risks though vegetable consumption. Biol Trace Elem Res; 2025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Balali-Mood M, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z, Khazdair MR, Sadeghi M. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: Mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:643972. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.643972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Genchi G, Sinicropi MS, Lauria G, Carocci A, Catalano A. The effects of cadmium toxicity. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3782. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sulaiman MB, Santuraki AH, Isa KA, Oluwasola OH. Geo-accumulation and contamination status of heavy metals in selected MSW dumpsites soil in Gombe, Nigeria. Bima Journal of Science and Technology. 2018;2(2):31–41. doi: 10.56892/bima.v2i02.89. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lere BK, Basira I, Abdulkadir S, Tahir SM, Ari HA, Ugya AY. Health risk assessment of heavy metals in irrigated fruits and vegetables cultivated in selected farms around Kaduna metropolis, Nigeria. Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2021;8(1):317–329. doi: 10.1080/2314808X.2021.1992956. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bibi A, Rasul F, Shahzad S. Sakrabani R, ud Din W, Mckenna P, et al. Toxicity, bioaccumulation and mitigating strategies of heavy metals stress on morpho-physiology of spinach. Discov Plants. 2024;1:74. doi: 10.1007/s44372-024-00083-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kohzadi S, Shahmoradi B, Ghaderi E, Loqmani H, Maleki A. Concentration, Source, and Potential Human Health Risk of Heavy Metals in the Commonly Consumed Medicinal Plants. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2019;187(1):41–50. doi: 10.1007/s12011-018-1357-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Marin S, Griswold W. Human health effects of heavy metals. [cited Aug 5, 2025]. Available from: https://engg.k-state.edu/chsr/outreach/resources/docs/15HumanHealthEffectsofHeavyMetals.pdf.
- 49.Maigari IA, Auwal MA, Sulaiman MB, Nwankwo DK. Determination and heavy metals some Nigerian medical plants. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences. 2021;13(1):153–157. doi: 10.4314/bajopas.v13i1.21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Singh KP, Bhattacharya S, Sharma P. Assessment of heavy metal contents of some Indian medicinal plants. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2014;14(10):1125–1129. doi: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2014.14.10.12447. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sawicka E, Jurkowska K, Piwowar A. Chromium (III) and chromium (VI) as important players in the induction of genotoxicity - current view. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2021;28(1):1–10. doi: 10.26444/aaem/118228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Georgaki MN, Charalambous M, Kazakis N, Talias MA, Georgakis C, Papamitsou T, et al. Chromium in water and carcinogenic human health risk. Environments. 2023;10(2):33. doi: 10.3390/environments10020033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ghani A, Ali Z, Ishtiaq M, Maqbool M, Parveen S. Estimation of macro and micro nutrients in some important medicinal plants of Soon Valley, District Khushab, Pakistan. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11(78):14386–14391. doi: 10.5897/AJB12.762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ribeiro LDS, Brandão FZ, Carvalheira LR, Goes TJF, Filho RAT, Quintão CCR, et al. Chromium supplementation improves glucose metabolism and vaginal temperature regulation in Girolando cows under heat stress conditions in a climatic chamber. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020;52(4):1661–1668. doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-02173-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ssempijja F, Kasozi KI, Eze ED, Tamale A, Ewuzie SA, Matama K, et al. Consumption of raw herbal medicines is associated with major public health risks amongst Ugandans. J Environ Public Health. 2020;2020:8516105. doi: 10.1155/2020/8516105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bambara TL, Derra M, Kaboré K, Tougma KA, Cissé OI, Zougmoré F. Levels of heavy metals in some vegetables and human health risk assessment in Loumbila Area, Burkina Faso. Open J Appl Sci. 2023;13(9):1498–1511. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2023.139119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Fabiano CC, Tezotto T, Favarin JL, Polacco JC, Mazzafera P. Essentiality of nickel in plants: a role in plant stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:754. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Hassan MU, Chattha MU, Khan I, Chattha MB, Aamer M, Nawaz M, et al. Nickel toxicity in plants: reasons, toxic effects, tolerance mechanisms, and remediation possibilities-a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019;26(13):12673–12688. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04892-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. United States, Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)-Generic Tables. [cited Aug 5, 2025]. Available from: https://www.epa.gov/risk/regional-screening-levels-rsls-generic-tables.
- 60.Said S, Benazzouz B, Bounouira H, Amsil H, Moussaif A. Comprehensive analysis of heavy metals content in organic and conventional vegetables and their health risk assessment. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2025:1–17. doi: 10.1080/03067319.2025.2463998. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
The parameters and input assumptions for exposure assessment of metals via ingestion routes.
Estimated daily intakes (EDI) of the PTEs in the in vegetable samples from main market.
Estimated daily intakes (EDI) of the PTEs in the in vegetable samples from old market.
Chronic daily intake (CDI) and cancer slope factor (CSF) of PTEs in the in vegetable samples from main market.
Chronic daily intake (CDI) and cancer slope factor (CSF) of PTEs in the in vegetable samples from old market.



