Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 2;13:1707035. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1707035

Table 2.

Basic features of the prediction models of the included studies.

Author (year) Modeling methods Variable screening method Modeling methods EPV AUC (training/validation) Model validation method Model calibration method Missing data processing method Continuous data processing method Model presentation
Li Yinglong* (2020) (17) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 30.333 0.805/0.816 Internal validation Hosmer Lemeshow test, Calibration plot Exclusion included Continuous variable Nomogram
Huang Tingping* (2022) (18) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR, SVM, RF 4.667 0.770/− – Hosmer Lemeshow test, Calibration plot – Continuous variable Nomogram
Li Xinyi* (2024) (19) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 8.000 0.875/− Internal validation – – Continuous variable –
Yong Liao (2023) (20) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 11.800 0.828/0.846 Internal validation (Bootstrap) Calibration plot Exclusion included Continuous variable Nomogram
Yang Yang (2021) (16) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 14.000 0.978/0.969 Internal validation Calibration plot Exclusion included Continuous variable Nomogram
Kejia Li (2024) (21) Prognostic model Single-factor analysis Cox regression 12.333 0.806/0.751 Internal validation Calibration plot - Continuous variable Nomogram
Yang Yang (2022) (22) Classification model Lasso regression, backward selection LR 7.286 0.901/0.903 Internal validation Hosmer Lemeshow test, Calibration plot Exclusion included Continuous variable Nomogram
Okan İnce (2023) (23) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR, SVM, CatBoost 15.000 SVM: 0.830/0.820 LR: 0.840/0.830 CATBOOST: 0.900/0.830 Internal validation (K-fold cross validation) – Exclusion included Continuous variable –
Sihang Cheng (2024) (24) Classification model Single-factor analysis, lasso regression LR, SVM, RF 2.818 SVM: 0.990/0.800 LR: 0.910/0.830 RF: 1.000/0.690 External validation – Exclusion included Continuous variable –
Chongtu Yang (2022) (25) Classification model Lasso regression LR 15.250 0.770/0.750 External verification Hosmer Lemeshow test, Calibration plot, Brier score Multiple interpolation Continuous variable Nomogram
Sihang Cheng (2022) (26) Classification model – LR 6.000 0.899/0.955 Internal validation (K-fold cross validation) – – Continuous variable –
Xiaochun Yin (2020) (27) Prognostic model Single-factor analysis Cox regression 23.400 0.809/0.783 Internal validation (Bootstrap) Calibration plot Exclusion included Continuous variable Nomogram
Huan Tong (2021) (28) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 12.167 0.783/− Internal validation – censored-data analysis Continuous variable Formula of risk score
Xiaoqiong Chen (2024) (29) Classification model Lasso regression LR 47.000 0.814/0.781 External validation Calibration plot Exclusion included Continuous variable Web calculator
Yuan Wei* (2021) (30) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 13.667 0.828/− – Calibration plot – Continuous variable Formula of risk score
Zhuo Songbo* (2023) (31) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 11.600 0.841/− – – – Continuous variable Formula of risk score
Yu Xiang* (2021) (32) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 12.000 0.723/− – – – Continuous variable Formula of risk score
Zhang Wenjing* (2024) (33) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 13.500 0.800/− – – Exclusion included Continuous variable Formula of risk score
Wang Lanjing* (2024) (34) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 16.250 0.716/− – – – Continuous variable Nomogram
Silvia Nardelli (2016) (35) Prognostic model Single-factor analysis Fine-Gray test 11.667 0.750/− – – – Continuous variable Formula of risk score
Chuhan Wang (2022) (36) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR 22.250 Model 1: 0.64/−
Model 2: 0.76/−
– Calibration plot Exclusion included Categorical variables Nomogram
Chang Peng* (2025) (39) Classification model Lasso regression LR 8.500 0.933/0.944 Internal validation Hosmer Lemeshow test – Continuous variable Nomogram
DeJia Liu (2025) (38) Classification model Single-factor analysis LR, RF, XGBoost 11.000 −/0.825 Internal validation Hosmer Lemeshow test, Calibration plot, Brier score – Continuous variable SHAP
Gianvincenzo Sparacia (2025) (37) Classification model Principal component analysis MLP, RF, SVC, DT 3.800 KNN: −/0.77 Internal validation – – Continuous variable –

*Published in China; –, Not reported in the literature; LR, Logistic regression; SVM, Support vector machine; RF, Random forest; MLP, Multilayer perceptron; KNN, K-nearest neighbor; SVC, Support vector classifier; DT, Decision tree.