Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 2;14:1725392. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1725392

Table 2.

Presence of sustainment practices (definition and so on) in follow-up studies, reported by the sustainment period.

EBI (follow-up paper author, year) Long-term follow-up planned Y/N (description) Sustainment defined Y/N (reference) Sustainment term used in original papers Y/N, term used (paper type, author, year) Sustainment framework or theory used Y/N Level of external support at the sustainment follow-up time point Strategies reported at follow-up
Studies reporting at maintenance timepoint (6–12 months)
PACE (Nathan, 2022) (8) Y (planned 6-month follow-up in this paper) Y (Proctor et al.) (16) Y, sustainability (Protocol, Nathan, 2019) N Lower than implementation Online resources, telephone support
Bihar School
Teachers Study (Sorensen 2013) (36)
Y (planned 6-month follow-up in implementation effect study) N Y, maintenance, (outcomes, Mathur, 2016) (41) N No ongoing support None reported
Studies reporting at early sustainment timepoint (12–24 months)
PLAY (Farmer 2017) (38) Y (planned 12-month follow-up in this paper) N N N No ongoing support None reported
Wolfenden (Wolfenden 2019) (37) N (long-term follow-up not mentioned in papers) N N N No ongoing support None reported
SPARK (McKenzie 1997) (39) N (long-term follow-up not mentioned in papers) N N N No ongoing support None reported
Studies reporting at the sustainment timepoint (24 months or greater)
Nathan V&F (author supplied data 2024) Y, repeated cross-sectional surveys (correspondence) N N N No ongoing support None reported