Table 4.
Application of different ML models through different data and species.
| Data type | ML model | Modeling output | Species | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruminants | Pigs | Poultry | |||
| Production records, feed intake, phenotypic traits. | regularizing models | Production and genomic performance prediction | (44–48, 81, 82) | (49–55) | (56, 83–87) |
| Sensor data, farm records, health, and management data | Tree-based models | Condition estimation and behavior classification, risk monitoring, and assessment | (88–91) | (92–97) | (98–102) |
| Accelerometer data, sample spectra, and imaging features. | Support Vector Machines (SVM) | Animal status, carcass, and body condition scoring | (103–108) | (49, 53, 55, 109–112) | (100, 113–116) |
| Production, metabolic, and environmental data. | Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) | Production and reproduction traits, and environmental impacts, Prediction | (117–126) | (54, 127–135) | (102, 136–140) |
| Visual/time-series and sensor data. | Deep learning models | Visual identification, status monitoring, and early detection. | (141–149) | (150–158) | (116, 159–165) |
| Multi-sensor data, omics datasets. | Unsupervised learning | Animal phenotyping, anomaly detection, | (166–171) | (154, 172–177) | (178–184) |