Table 5.
Model fit indices for latent profile analysis of future work self-salience and professional identity.
| Profile | AIC | BIC | aBIC | Entropy | LMR (p) | BLRT (p) | Proportion of potential subgroups |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 31209.121 | 31408.859 | 31262.830 | – | – | – | – |
| 2 | 27207.994 | 27511.943 | 27289.725 | 0.956 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 46.2%/53.8% |
| 3 | 25701.872 | 26110.032 | 25811.625 | 0.957 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 38.5%/50.3%/11.2% |
| 4 | 25130.579 | 25642.949 | 25268.354 | 0.945 | 0.058 | <0.001 | 21.9%/22.5%/44.8%/10.8% |
| 5 | 24652.572 | 25269.154 | 24818.369 | 0.951 | 0.579 | <0.001 | 1.1%/21.5%/22.2%/44.4%/10.8% |
AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; aBIC = sample-size adjusted BIC; LMR = Lo–Mendell–Rubin likelihood ratio test; BLRT = bootstrap likelihood ratio test. The 3-profile model (in bold) was selected as the optimal solution.