Abstract
This study evaluated the potential of the diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique to assess radiogenic strontium (Sr) and lead (Pb) isotope signatures in bioavailable soil fractions as a proxy for plant uptake. Concentrations (cDGT) and isotope ratios of Sr (87Sr/86Sr) and Pb (207Pb/206Pb, 208Pb/206Pb, 206Pb/204Pb) assessed by DGT (TK100, Chelex), along with extractable (NH4NO3, NH4OAc, EDTA) and total Sr and Pb mass fractions and isotope ratios, were compared to those in Lactuca sativa L. (lettuce), Triticum aestivum L. (wheat), and Raphanus sativus L. (radish) grown on five geochemically distinct soils. Relative to conventional soil extraction, DGT significantly reduced matrix loads, facilitating isotope ratio measurements by multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. DGT-labile Sr and Pb concentrations and isotope ratios reflected soil-specific geochemical signatures, allowing for clear differentiation among soils. Importantly, DGT-labile isotope ratios closely matched those in plant tissues across soils and species within analytical uncertainty, demonstrating that DGT captures the isotopically relevant bioavailable Sr and Pb pool without inducing significant mass-dependent isotopic fractionation. These findings establish DGT as a practical tool for bioavailable multi-isotope tracing with strong potential for applications in environmental forensics, food authentication, and archaeological provenance research.
Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00216-026-06315-6.
Keywords: Passive sampling, Soil extraction, Metal stable isotopes, Geographical origin, MC-ICP-MS
Introduction
Radiogenic isotope ratios of strontium (i.e., 87Sr/86Sr) and lead (e.g., 207Pb/206Pb, 208Pb/206Pb, 206Pb/204Pb) vary systematically across the Earth’s surface due to differences in bedrock age, geochemical evolution, and atmospheric deposition [1–3]. Initially applied in the geosciences [4, 5], radiogenic Sr and Pb isotope variations are now widely used to trace biological mobility, material provenance, and contaminant sources in applications ranging from archaeology and ecology to environmental forensics and food authentication [6–11]. In soils, Sr isotopes are particularly informative for quantifying weathering regimes and agricultural inputs from liming and irrigation [12–15], while Pb isotopes are sensitive tracers of anthropogenic pollution pathways and legacy contamination from industrial and mining activities [16–18]. The growing range of such applications has been mainly driven by advances in multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (MC-ICP-MS), enabling high-precision isotope ratio measurements with high sample throughput [19].
To assign radiogenic Sr and Pb isotope signatures in biological samples to their geographic origin, they must be compared against local baselines that reflect the bioavailable isotopic composition of the environment [2]. Bioavailable soil fractions are increasingly used for this purpose [20–22], as they incorporate both the regional geogenic and atmospheric isotopic signatures [23, 24], while reducing complications introduced by species-specific uptake mechanisms, trophic mixing, and physiological or ecological variability associated with plant or animal proxies [14, 25, 26]. However, for such baselines to be reliable, the bioavailable soil pools must be characterized using methods that accurately assess the isotopic fractions of Sr and Pb accessible to plants.
Uptake of Sr and Pb in plants occurs primarily via root absorption of soluble, exchangeable, and weakly complexed species in the rhizosphere. Traditional chemical soil extraction methods using neutral salt solutions (e.g., NH4NO3, NH4OAc) or chelating agents (e.g., EDTA) are commonly applied to approximate these bioavailable pools [27–29]. For example, 87Sr/86Sr ratios in NH4NO3 soil extracts have been shown to correspond with those in plant tissues and plant-derived food products [22, 30–32]. However, such methods are operationally defined, vary in selectivity, and do not mimic the kinetic uptake mechanisms of plant roots [33]. Furthermore, they typically require large soil quantities (20–100 g), are prone to elevated blanks from multistep reagent-intensive workflows, and yield complex matrices rich in major cations (e.g., Na+, K+, Ca2+) and/or organic compounds (e.g., acetate, EDTA) that cause spectral and non-spectral interferences during isotope ratio measurements [19, 27–29]. These limitations highlight the need for alternative sampling approaches that more closely mimic kinetic root uptake, require less sample material, and generate cleaner, low-matrix solutions that can be either analyzed directly or are easy to process for isotopic analysis.
The diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) technique is an established analytical tool for assessing the dynamic availability of elements in soils to plants [33–35]. Acting as an infinite sink, DGT induces diffusion of labile species from soil solution into the sampler and desorption from soil solid phases upon solute depletion, mimicking plant root uptake under diffusion-limited conditions [33, 36]. Moreover, the capability of selective DGT techniques for targeted analyte sampling effectively reduces matrix interferences, potentially enabling more straightforward isotope ratio analysis via MC-ICP-MS by reducing or eliminating the need for laborious matrix separation procedures [37, 38]. Despite DGT’s established role in assessing metal bioavailability, its application for isotope ratio analysis remains largely underexplored, with only a few studies assessing stable isotope ratios in labile soil fractions [37–41]. Thus, a gap remains in understanding whether DGT-labile Sr and Pb fractions carry isotopic signatures that are reliably mirrored in plant tissues, and whether this relationship holds across different plant species and soil types.
The present study addresses this question by evaluating if radiogenic Sr and Pb isotope signatures assessed by DGT reflect those taken up in plants. We evaluated two DGT techniques, the recently developed TK100 DGT [38] and the widely used Chelex DGT [42], alongside traditional extraction and digestion methods across six geochemically distinct soils in comparison to plants grown in selected soils under controlled conditions. Our hypotheses included the following: (1) The DGT techniques enable selective sampling of labile, bioavailable Sr and Pb and reduce analytical interferences; (2) DGT-labile isotope ratios reflect environmental sources consistent with traditional methods of soil analysis; and (3) isotope ratios in plants match those of the DGT-labile soil fraction, independent of plant species or tissue type.
Materials and methods
To comply with notation conventions in DGT literature, the symbol c is used throughout this work for both molar and mass concentrations in solution instead of the designated symbols c and γ recommended by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC). For isotope ratios and isotopic differences between two samples, the small delta (δ) and capital delta (∆) symbols are used, respectively. This notation expresses isotope ratios relative to an internationally accepted reference material, ensuring consistency and comparability of the reported data [43]. For completeness and further comparability, absolute isotope amount ratios are also provided. Details on general laboratory procedures, solutions, and materials are provided in the Supplementary Information (Text S1).
Soil sampling and characterization
Six soil samples (~ 30–80 kg; 0–30 cm depth) were collected in 2018 from different sites in Austria (AT), Czechia (CZ), Germany (DE), and Slovenia (SI) (Fig. 1, Table S1). Soils TU, SL, and ST were collected from uncontaminated agricultural sites, whereas AS, MZ, and PR were collected from contaminated sites with elevated Pb levels due to historic Pb mining and smelting activities [44–46]. The soils were air-dried, sieved to either ≤ 2 mm for soil analyses or ≤ 4 mm for plant experiments, and stored in the dark at room temperature until use. Soils were digested according to Prohaska et al. [16]. Extractable Sr was determined using NH4NO3 (c = 1 mol L−1) and NH4OAc (c = 1 mol L−1, pH 7) extraction [27, 28]. Extractable Pb was determined using NH4NO3 (c = 1 mol L−1) and EDTA (c = 0.05 mol L−1) extraction [27, 29]. Soil digests and extracts were analyzed for Ca, Rb, Sr, and Pb using ICP-MS (measurement details are provided in section “Mass spectrometric analysis”). Both NH4OAc and EDTA extracts were subjected to microwave-assisted acid digestion to decompose dissolved organic compounds and the organic matrix that could interfere in matrix separation by column chromatography for subsequent isotope ratio measurements. Details of the total soil and extract digestion procedures are provided in the Supplementary Information (Text S2). Soil pH, CaCO3, organic C, clay, silt, and sand contents, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and water holding capacity (WHC) were determined following routine procedures [28, 47]. Geolithological and chronological information was retrieved from databases and literature references [44, 48].
Fig. 1.

Geographical location of the soil sampling sites, with agricultural soils (TU, SL, ST) marked in green and contaminated soils (AS, MZ, PR) marked in red. Additional soil details are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S1)
DGT application in soils
The TK100 DGT [38] and Chelex DGT [42] techniques were used to assess the capability of DGT as a proxy for Sr and Pb bioavailability and their radiogenic isotope signatures in plants. Both devices contained a binding layer, agarose cross-linked polyacrylamide (APA) diffusive gel (thickness 0.8 mm), and PES membrane (pore size 0.45 µm, thickness 0.15 mm). For TK100 DGTs, the binding layer was a TK100 membrane (thickness 0.7 mm; TrisKem International, FR), prepared as described in Wagner et al. [38]. For Chelex DGTs, the binding layer was a polyacrylamide gel (thickness 0.4 mm) containing milled Chelex-100 resin (particle size ≤ 10 µm) to provide a more homogeneous resin distribution while maintaining an adequate binding capacity compared to the original gel formulation [49]. Milling of the original Chelex-100 (sodium form, particle size 37–75 µm; Sigma-Aldrich, AT) was accomplished according to Doolette et al. [50]. Diffusive gels and PES membranes were preconditioned in NaNO3 (c = 0.01 mol L−1) for ≥ 24 h before assembly. For deployment, ~ 150 g of each soil was mixed with ultrapure water to reach 100% WHC, incubated at 24 °C for 24 h, and applied as a ~ 2-mm-thick layer (~ 2 g dry weight) on the DGT devices. The DGTs were gently tapped to ensure continuous soil contact and then placed in closed plastic boxes for 24 h at 24 °C in an incubator. Subsamples (V = ~ 20 mL) of the incubated soils were used to collect soil solution as described previously [38].
After deployment, DGTs were cleaned of soil and disassembled, and the binding layers were retrieved. TK100 membranes were eluted in three consecutive steps: first with 10 mL HCl (c = 0.01 mol L−1) for 1 h to desorb co-bound matrix elements, second with 10 mL HCl (c = 2 mol L−1) for 24 h to desorb Sr and partly Pb, and third with 10 mL HCl (c = 6 mol L−1) for 24 h to desorb residual Pb [38]. For isotope ratio analysis, the second fraction was used for Sr (fe = 0.75), whereas for Pb, the second and third fractions were pooled to obtain adequate elution recovery (fe = 0.87). Chelex gels were subjected to single-step elution in 10 mL HNO3 (c = 1 mol L−1) for 24 h, as quantitative elution of both Sr (fe = 1.00) [51] and Pb (fe = 0.95) [52] has been reported under these conditions. DGT-labile concentrations (cDGT) were calculated from the analyte mass bound to the binding layer (mbl) using Eqs. 1 and 2, and R values were calculated as the ratio of cDGT values and soil solution concentrations (csoln) using Eq. 3:
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
where ce is the analyte mass concentration in the eluate, Vbl is the binding layer volume, Ve is the eluate volume, fe is the elution recovery, Δg is the diffusion layer thickness, Ap is the exposure window area, D is the diffusion coefficient, and t is the deployment time. For fe, the second eluate fraction was considered for Sr (fe = 0.75) and the third fraction for Pb (fe = 0.56). Diffusion coefficients for Sr and Pb at 24 °C were taken from Wagner et al. [38]. DGTs treated as samples but without soil contact were included as blanks. Background equivalent concentrations (BECs), limits of detection (xL), and limits of quantification (xQ) of the TK100 and Chelex DGT for Sr and Pb were consistent with previous reports [38] and are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S2).
Plant experiment and sample preparation
The experimental plant species were Lactuca sativa L. var. crispa (lettuce), Triticum aestivum L. cv. gr70 (wheat), and Raphanus sativus L. cv. Cherry Belle (radish). These plant species were chosen as representative crops to investigate the suitability of the DGT techniques and soil extraction methods for isotopic tracing of plant origin. Seeds were purchased from Vielfalt erleben GmbH (Vienna, AT) and Samen Maier GmbH (Taiskirchen im Innkreis, AT) and germinated for 5 days on moist tissue in Petri dishes. Four uniform seedlings per species were transplanted in 1.45-L pots filled with ~ 1200 g of each of the six experimental soils (bulk density ~ 1.1 g cm−3), amended with acid-washed quartz sand (w = 10%) to improve aeration and avoid reducing conditions that could affect metal speciation and lability as well as root development. Each species-soil combination had four replicates. Plant growth was conducted in a controlled greenhouse environment with average day/night temperatures of 21 °C/16 °C (14 h/10 h), relative humidity of 55–70%, and a minimum photosynthetic active radiation intensity of 300 µmol m−2 s−1. At the time of seedling transplantation, soils were fertilized with a mixed NH4NO3 and NH4H2PO4 solution to provide adequate amounts of N (w = 150 mg kg−1) and P (w = 133 mg kg−1) for plant growth. Soil moisture was maintained at 50–60% WHC by gravimetric irrigation twice per week using deionized water.
Plants were harvested 30–52 days after planting, depending on the development status and the formation of necrosis indicating toxicity when grown in the contaminated soils. Replicates of the same plant species were harvested at the same time. Plants were cut immediately above the soil surface and separated into belowground and aboveground tissues. For lettuce and wheat, only the aboveground tissues (shoots) were further processed, while radish included both shoots and fully developed bulbs. Details on plant sample preparation and digestion are provided in the Supplementary Information (Text S3).
Plant growth in the PR soil was severely inhibited by the high Pb mass fraction in this soil (w(Pb)total = 5009 ± 113 mg kg−1; Table S1), which exceeds typical safety limits by more than one order of magnitude and falls well within the range known to impair root development and net photosynthesis [53]. Therefore, no plant data could be collected for this soil.
Matrix separation
To obtain purified Sr and Pb fractions for isotope ratio analysis, soil extracts, soil digests, and plant digests were processed using an automated Sr-Pb/matrix separation method based on DGA resin (TrisKem International, FR) and the prepFAST MC system (Elemental Scientific, USA) [54, 55]. Sr eluates from TK100 DGTs were subjected to manual column separation using the Sr spec resin (TrisKem International, FR) [56], while Pb eluates of TK100 and Chelex DGTs were analyzed without additional purification. Procedural details are provided in the Supplementary Information (Text S4, Table S3).
Mass spectrometric analysis
Elemental analysis was performed using quadrupole ICP-MS (Elan 9000 DRCe, Perkin Elmer, USA) and sector-field ICP-MS (Element XR, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with internal normalization and external calibration as described previously [38]. Isotope ratio analysis of Sr and Pb was performed using MC-ICP-MS (Nu Sapphire or Nu Plasma HR, Nu Instruments, UK) coupled to a membrane desolvator (Aridus II, Teledyne CETAC, USA; or Apex Omega, ESI, USA). Optimization procedures and instrumental parameters of all MC-ICP-MS measurements are provided in the Supplementary Information (Text S5, Table S4). Correction of blank levels and residual isobaric interferences was accomplished as reported previously [54, 57]. To account for instrumental isotopic fractionation (IIF) and potential natural mass-dependent fractionation (MDF), 87Sr/86Sr was corrected internally using a fixed 88Sr/86Sr ratio of 8.37861 from the SRM 987 certificate [57]. IIF of 207Pb/206Pb, 208Pb/206Pb, and 206Pb/204Pb was corrected by standard-sample bracketing (SSB) [54]. Measurements were performed in a SSB sequence at Sr and Pb concentrations in samples and bracketing standards (matched at ± 10%) of 10–50 µg L−1 and 1.5–25 µg L−1, respectively, in HNO3 (w = 2%) for digests, extracts, and Chelex DGT eluates, or HCl (w = 2%) for TK100 DGT eluates. Isotope ratios and isotopic differences are reported as δ- and ∆-values (both in ‰), respectively, according to Eqs. 4 and 5:
| 4 |
| 5 |
where iE/jE refers to 87Sr/86Sr, 207Pb/206Pb, 208Pb/206Pb, or 206Pb/204Pb and R’ is the blank-, interference-, and IIF-corrected isotope amount ratio n(iE)/n(jE) of the sample (spl) or isotopic standard (std). Because the same isotopic standards were used in all Sr (SRM 987, NIST, USA) and Pb (SRM 981, NIST, USA) isotope ratio analyses, the index std is omitted for simplicity. Absolute Sr and Pb isotope amount ratios are provided in the Supplementary Information.
Analytical performance
The analytical performance of elemental and isotope ratio analysis was assessed using certified reference materials (CRMs) and in-house quality controls (QCs). For elemental analyses, QCs were prepared by mixing certified single- and multi-element solutions and measured every 6–12 samples [38], yielding recoveries within ± 10% of target values across runs. To validate elemental quantification in digests, soil (ISE 885; WEPAL, NL) and plant (SRM 1547, NIST; IPE 200, WEPAL) CRMs were included, resulting in quantitative Sr and Pb recoveries. Isotope ratio accuracy was verified through repeated analysis of isotopic CRMs (SRM 987, SRM 981), providing δ-values covering the certified value (δ = 0‰) within the measurement uncertainty. Matrix separation efficiency and potential on-column isotopic fractionation were evaluated by processing spiked SRM 987 and SRM 981 solutions under representative sample conditions in each separation batch, yielding δ-values between −0.19 and 0.14‰. Measured 87Sr/86Sr and 207Pb/206Pb ratios of SRM 1547 agreed with literature values [22, 58], while for ISE 885 and IPE 200, these values are reported here for the first time. Full validation data are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S5, S6).
Uncertainty calculation and statistical analysis
Expanded uncertainties (U, k = 2) of isotope ratios were calculated using a Kragten approach [57, 59] and included both the combined measurement uncertainty and repeatability between sample replicates [38]. For reporting U (k = 2) on ∆-values, U (k = 2) of both soil and plant samples were combined. Statistical differences in elemental data were assessed by Welch’s ANOVA (one-way) followed by Games-Howell post hoc test due to unequal variances using Jamovi (version 2.3.28). Statistical differences between two mean values of relative isotope ratio data were assessed considering their U (k = 2) [37, 60]. Linear regressions were computed and visualized using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, USA). Unless stated otherwise, elemental concentrations, mass fractions, and their ratios are reported as means ± standard deviations (s), and isotope ratios as means ± U (k = 2).
Results and discussion
Soil properties
The six soils covered a range of geographical, geological, and physicochemical conditions, reflecting diverse land use histories, parent materials, and soil types across Central Europe (Table S1). Total Sr mass fractions ranged from 52.0 (PR) to 163 mg kg−1 (SL), consistent with global background values [61]. Extractable Sr, assessed by NH4NO3 and NH4OAc, accounted for 2–7% of total Sr. NH4NO3-extractable Sr was 8–16% lower (SL, ST, MZ; p < 0.05), 18% higher (PR; p < 0.001), or not significantly different (TU, AS; p > 0.05) than NH4OAc-extractable Sr. These variable differences indicate that Sr extractability from exchangeable pools is strongly soil-dependent, likely reflecting differences in mineral composition and surface reactivity between the soils. Mass fraction ratios of Rb/Sr in total soil fractions varied from 0.57 (MZ) to 2.20 (ST), reflecting distinct lithological backgrounds [62].
Total Pb mass fractions ranged from 27.6 to 45.9 mg kg−1 in the uncontaminated agricultural soils TU, SL, and ST, up to 1040 to 5009 mg kg−1 in the contaminated soils AS, MZ, and PR. Thus, the three contaminated soils had Pb mass fractions more than ten times above the Austrian guideline limit of 100 mg kg−1 for Pb in agricultural soils [63]. However, NH4NO3-extractable Pb in AS, MZ, and PR was low, varying from 0.50 to 12.8 mg kg−1 and constituting < 1% of total Pb. EDTA-extractable Pb mirrored the total Pb pattern, ranging from 4.04 to 2810 mg kg−1 and accounting for 14–66% of total Pb. Extractability of Pb by EDTA was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in contaminated soils (61.9 ± 4.7%, n = 9) than in uncontaminated soils (21.8 ± 11.6%, n = 9), reflecting the greater lability and potential bioavailability of Pb with increasing total Pb in soil [64].
The soils also varied substantially in pH, including four acidic soils (SL, ST, AS, PR) with pH between 4.5 and 5.0, and two soils (TU, MZ) with close to neutral pH, varying from 7.0 to 7.3, which also contained significant amounts of CaCO3 between 83 and 115 g kg−1. Soil organic carbon ranged from 9.85 g kg−1 in ST to 67.1 g kg−1 in MZ. Cation exchange capacity ranged from 51 mmolc kg−1 in PR to 340 mmolc kg−1 in TU, generally aligning with clay content, which ranged from 82 (PR, MZ) to 268 g kg−1 (TU).
DGT concentrations of Sr and Pb
DGT concentrations (cDGT) of Sr and Pb in the six soils differed markedly between the two applied DGT techniques, with consistently higher cDGT and R values for both Sr and Pb determined by TK100 DGT compared to Chelex DGT (Table 1). This difference was particularly striking for Sr, where cDGT(Sr) values ranged from 42.9 to 174 µg L−1 for TK100 DGT but remained ≤ 10 µg L−1 for Chelex DGT across all soils. The observed difference was most pronounced for the calcareous soils TU and MZ, where cDGT(Sr) was 23 and 30 times higher for TK100 DGT than for Chelex DGT, respectively. This finding is consistent with nonquantitative uptake of Sr by Chelex DGT due to competitive effects between Sr2+ and other divalent metal cations with either higher selectivity for the iminodiacetate groups in the Chelex resin (e.g., Cu2+, Pb2+, Zn2+) [65] or higher relative abundance in labile element fractions in the soil (e.g., Ca2+, Mg2+) [66]. Accordingly, the weakly adsorbed Sr2+ on the Chelex binding layer was replaced via ion exchange during sampling, resulting in a significant underestimation of labile Sr by Chelex DGT, especially under the highly competitive conditions of calcareous soils. The high selectivity and capacity of the TK100 DGT for Sr2+ effectively overcomes this limitation, allowing for quantitative analysis of labile Sr across different soil types.
For Pb, DGT concentrations in the agricultural soils TU and ST were below the limit of detection (xL) and in SL below the limit of quantification (xQ) (Table S2), which is consistent with the ultra-low levels of Pb in soil solutions typically found under uncontaminated conditions [66]. In the contaminated soils AS, MZ, and PR, DGT-labile Pb was high, with cDGT(Pb) values ranging from 74.8 to 575 µg L−1 for TK100 DGT and 26.1 to 77.3 µg L−1 for Chelex DGT (Table 1). Thus, as for Sr, DGT-labile Pb was significantly higher when assessed with TK100 DGT compared to Chelex DGT, reaching up to ten times higher cDGT(Pb) values in the highly contaminated PR soil. Despite the similar results for Sr and Pb, competitive effects are unlikely to explain this observation for Pb, given the high selectivity of Chelex for Pb2+ [67]. In a previous laboratory experiment deploying TK100 DGTs (n = 3) for 24 h in unbuffered media (V = 2 L), we found a decrease in solution pH from ~ 5 to ~ 4 during the deployment period [38], suggesting that the TK100 DGT affects pH via proton exchange at the di(2-ethyl-hexyl)phosphoric acid phase of the TK100 resin. Depending on the soil buffering capacity, this mechanism may locally acidify the soil during sampling, resulting in enhanced Pb resupply from the soil solid phase into the soil solution due to the pH-dependent release of sorbed Pb [68]. Consequently, significantly higher R values were obtained for Pb assessed by TK100 DGT compared to Chelex DGT (Table 1), even exceeding a value of 1 for the weakly buffered PR soil, demonstrating Pb mobilization by the TK100 DGT. These findings indicate that proton exchange at the TK100 binding phase can modify metal resupply kinetics via altered acid-base equilibria at the sampling interface, resulting in cDGT values that may deviate from those obtained under strictly passive sampling conditions. The magnitude of this effect can, however, be quantified using speciation models and analytical expressions [69, 70], allowing its influence on metal lability to be constrained rather than treated as an uncontrolled artifact. Auspiciously, this effect also offers a unique opportunity to probe environmentally relevant mobilization mechanisms, as comparable microscale acidification is well documented in soils due to root activity and microbially mediated proton or organic acid exudation [71–73]. Conversely, in environmental systems with large and well-mixed aqueous reservoirs, such as rivers, any proton release from the binding phase is expected to be rapidly dissipated by advective transport, such that TK100 DGT effectively operates as a purely passive sampler.
Table 1.
DGT concentrations (cDGT) and R values (cDGT/csoln) of Sr and Pb in soilsa
| Soil | Sr | Pb | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TK100 DGT | Chelex DGT | TK100 DGT | Chelex DGT | |||||
| cDGT / (µg L−1) | R | cDGT / (µg L−1) | R | cDGT / (µg L−1) | R | cDGT / (µg L−1) | R | |
| TU | 174 ± 23 | 0.66 ± 0.07 | 7.58 ± 1.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | < xL | n.a | < xL | n.a |
| SL | 57.8 ± 2.4 | 0.32 ± 0.04 | 10.5 ± 0.2 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| ST | 42.9 ± 2.4 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 6.65 ± 0.68 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | < xL | n.a | < xL | n.a |
| AS | 46.6 ± 3.0 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 8.90 ± 0.26 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 231 ± 13 | 0.64 ± 0.05 | 77.3 ± 5.2 | 0.21 ± 0.01 |
| MZ | 168 ± 22 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 5.80 ± 0.73 | 0.01 ± < 0.01 | 74.8 ± 6.8 | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 26.1 ± 2.7 | 0.24 ± 0.02 |
| PR | 52.2 ± 3.2 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 7.62 ± 0.35 | 0.05 ± < 0.01 | 575 ± 42 | 1.66 ± 0.16 | 56.0 ± 1.3 | 0.16 ± 0.01 |
aValues are means ± s (n = 3). TK100 DGT data for soils SL, AS, and MZ was taken from Wagner et al. [38]. No errors are shown for values < xQ. n.a not analyzed
Plant uptake of Sr and Pb in relation to soil bioavailability
The mass uptake of Sr and Pb in plant tissues varied significantly between soils, plant species, and plant parts (Table S7). Across all soils (n = 6), maximum Sr mass fractions were found in radish shoots (82.2 ± 8.8 mg kg−1) followed by lettuce shoots (29.8 ± 7.2 mg kg−1), radish bulbs (25.2 ± 10.2 mg kg−1), and wheat shoots (20.7 ± 11.7 mg kg−1). For Pb, tissue mass fractions in uncontaminated soils (n = 3) followed: lettuce shoots (0.25 ± 0.27 mg kg−1) > radish bulbs (0.16 ± 0.06 mg kg−1) > radish shoots (0.11 ± 0.01 mg kg−1) > wheat shoots (0.08 ± 0.04 mg kg−1), while in contaminated soils (n = 3) the trend was: radish bulbs (236 ± 281 mg kg−1) > lettuce shoots (23.6 ± 21.6 mg kg−1) > radish shoots (18.4 ± 11.6 mg kg−1) > wheat shoots (15.9 ± 14.5 mg kg−1). These values generally agree with reported literature ranges for these plant species grown in soils with comparable total Sr and Pb mass fractions (Table S1) [61, 74, 75].
The uptake of Sr was soil-dependent for all plant species (p < 0.01) except radish shoots (p > 0.05) (Table S7). However, Sr uptake did not correlate with the TK100 DGT-labile or NH4NO3- and NH4OAc-extractable fractions (p > 0.05) (Table S8). This lack of correlation is consistent with the understanding that Sr uptake follows that of Ca and is primarily controlled by mass flow [76–78], a process driven by transpiration-induced water flux. Under such conditions, the elemental concentration in the soil solution and the rate of water uptake are more critical than the size of the labile or exchangeable pool [79]. Thus, for elements such as Sr, whose uptake is driven by mass flow and subject to complex ion competition, methods such as DGT may have limited predictive power for elemental mass uptake in plants because they do not mechanistically mimic root uptake under mass flow-controlled conditions [33].
For Pb, plant uptake was also soil-dependent (p < 0.01), with significantly elevated mass fractions in plants grown in the contaminated soils AS and MZ (Table S7). Noteworthy, Pb mass fractions in all plants grown on these soils clearly exceeded the maximum level of 0.1 mg kg−1 (wet weight) for Pb in most edible plant parts set by the European Commission [80], considering a conservative water content estimate of 95% [81], highlighting the risk posed by legacy contamination. Although not significant (p > 0.05), the consistently higher Pb mass fractions in radish bulbs compared to shoots are confirmed by previous studies [74, 82] and indicate restricted Pb translocation from belowground to aboveground tissues, possibly as a mechanism to cope with Pb toxicity via sequestration in rhizodermal or cortical cells [83].
Maximum Pb mass fractions were consistently observed in plants grown on AS, despite the two times lower total Pb mass fraction in AS compared to MZ (Table S1). This is consistent with the lower pH and CEC of AS compared to MZ and confirms previous work showing that Pb bioavailability is primarily controlled by its solubility rather than its total content in soil [61, 84]. The bioavailability indices differed considerably in their ability to indicate this soil dependency of Pb availability. EDTA extraction did not indicate this difference in bioavailability but rather reflected the total Pb content, with about two times lower EDTA-extractable Pb in AS than MZ. Conversely, NH4NO3 extraction overestimated Pb bioavailability by almost an order of magnitude (Table S1). In contrast, labile Pb assessed by the two DGT techniques corresponded well with the observed differences in plant uptake, as evidenced by similar ratios of cDGT(Pb) and plant shoot w(Pb) between AS and MZ (TK100 DGT = 3.1 ± 0.2, Chelex DGT = 3.0 ± 0.5, plant shoot average = 4.0 ± 1.2). This confirms that DGT samples the Pb pool most relevant for plant uptake, providing a more robust and predictive indicator of Pb bioavailability than the applied extraction methods.
Matrix composition of DGT eluates compared to soil extracts
A potential advantage of DGT for isotope ratio analysis is its ability to selectively accumulate target analytes while reducing matrix interferences. To evaluate this, DGT eluates and soil extracts were analyzed for Ca and Rb, which are the primary matrix elements interfering with accurate Sr isotope ratio measurements in bioavailable soil fractions [30, 38, 54]. For Pb, elevated Ca can suppress ICP-MS signals and compromise the efficiency of column-based purification procedures [55]. Because Pb concentrations in DGT eluates of uncontaminated soils were < xQ (Table S2), only samples of the contaminated soils (AS, MZ, PR) were considered for Pb in this evaluation.
As shown in Fig. 2, TK100 DGT eluates had the lowest overall matrix load, demonstrating effective matrix reduction via selective sampling and three-step elution. Across all soils (n = 6), mean Ca/Sr mass fraction ratios in TK100 eluates (54.4 ± 12.6) were significantly lower than those in NH4NO3 (320 ± 83) and NH4OAc extracts (314 ± 104) (p < 0.001), reflecting discrimination of the Ca matrix (Fig. 2a). Likewise, Rb/Sr × 1000 ratios were significantly lower in TK100 eluates (4.12 ± 3.82) than in NH4NO3 (304 ± 274) and NH4OAc extracts (300 ± 258) (p < 0.001), showing reduction of the isobaric Rb interference (Fig. 2b). The Chelex DGT was excluded from this comparison due to nonquantitative Sr uptake (Table 1).
Fig. 2.

Mass fraction (w) ratios of Ca/Sr (a), Rb/Sr × 1000 (b), and Ca/Pb (c) in the DGT eluates and soil extracts of the three uncontaminated agricultural soils (TU, SL, ST) and three contaminated soils (AS, MZ, PR). Values are means ± s (n = 3). Exact values are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S9)
For Pb, a similar pattern was observed (Fig. 2c). Across the contaminated soils AS, MZ, and PR (n = 3), mean Ca/Pb ratios in pooled (fractions 2 and 3) TK100 eluates (64.3 ± 97.1) were lower than those in Chelex eluates (93.5 ± 106.8) and especially NH4NO3 extracts (1545 ± 2587). EDTA extracts provided the lowest Ca/Pb ratios (5.27 ± 7.98), consistent with its strong Pb chelation (log KPb-EDTA ≈ 18) and efficient displacement of matrix cations [85]. However, while EDTA provides high extraction efficiency, it introduces a concentrated organic matrix that may interfere with chromatographic separation and requires complete ligand degradation to enable Pb isolation. In contrast, DGT eluates provide a simple inorganic acid matrix, offering enhanced analytical compatibility with column chemistry and MC-ICP-MS analysis.
Sr and Pb isotope ratios in DGT-labile, extractable, and total soil fractions
The relationship between DGT-labile, extractable, and total soil Sr and Pb isotope ratios was evaluated to assess whether DGT provides representative isotope signatures of bioavailable Sr and Pb. As shown in Fig. 3 and Table S10, the Sr and Pb isotope ratios in DGT-labile soil fractions varied significantly, with δ(87Sr/86Sr)DGT ranging from −1.51 to 12.6‰ across all soils, and δ(207Pb/206Pb)DGT from −67.3 to −58.2‰, δ(208Pb/206Pb)DGT from −32.4 to −27.6‰, and δ(206Pb/204Pb)DGT from 68.4 to 83.5‰ across contaminated soils (AS, MZ, PR). These values closely matched those in extractable soil fractions. For Sr, strong correlations were obtained for δ(87Sr/86Sr) between TK100 DGT and both NH4NO3 and NH4OAc (R2 > 0.999; Fig. 3a, b), without significant differences between these fractions (Table S10). For Pb, all isotope ratios overlapped with the corresponding line of identity (Fig. 3d–i), showing overall no significant differences between TK100 and Chelex DGT (Table S10), thus confirming that Pb mobilization by the TK100 DGT (Table 1) did not cause significant isotopic fractionation. These results indicate that the applied DGT techniques and conventional soil extraction methods sample similar radiogenic Sr and Pb isotope pools, ensuring data comparability.
Fig. 3.
Relationship between Sr and Pb isotope ratios in DGT-labile soil fractions (y-axes) and those in extractable and total soil fractions (x-axes), including NH4NO3 and NH4OAc extracts and total digests for δ(87Sr/86Sr) (a–c), and NH4NO3 and EDTA extracts and total digests for δ(207Pb/206Pb) (d–f), δ(208Pb/206Pb) (g–i), and δ(206Pb/204Pb) (j–l). Values are means (n = 3) ± U (k = 2). Dashed lines indicate the 1:1 relationship (= line of identity). Solid lines and grey areas in a and b indicate the linear regression curve and 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Exact δ-values and absolute Sr and Pb isotope ratios of soils are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S10, S11)
In contrast, significant differences between DGT-labile/extractable and total soil fractions were observed consistently for δ(87Sr/86Sr) across all soils (Fig. 3c, Table S10), but not for δ(207Pb/206Pb) (Fig. 3f, Table S10), and only partially for δ(208Pb/206Pb) (Fig. 3i, Table S10) and δ(206Pb/204Pb) across contaminated soils (Fig. 3l, Table S10). This agrees with findings from previous studies [7, 30, 31, 86, 87] and reflects the differential contribution of Sr and Pb incorporated in isotopically distinct, mineral-bound pools. For Sr, the apparent differences clearly show the presence of these insoluble pools across all soils, which are not accessed by TK100 DGT or soil extraction. Interestingly, soil SL was the only case where the total soil fraction had significantly lower δ(87Sr/86Sr) than its DGT-labile and extractable counterparts. For the remaining soils, total fractions had significantly higher δ(87Sr/86Sr), suggesting variable, soil-dependent isotopic partitioning. These patterns may be attributed to differential mineral weathering in relation to pedogenetic processes, leading to varying isotopic differences in labile versus bulk pools, which become less distinct with increasing radiogenic contribution [20]. For Pb, little isotopic heterogeneity across fractions in contaminated soils suggests that the contribution of the mineral-bound pool is negligible compared to the labile pool, thereby minimizing isotopic partitioning [7, 87, 88]. In contrast, in uncontaminated soils, total fractions showed lower δ(207Pb/206Pb) and δ(208Pb/206Pb) and higher δ(206Pb/204Pb) than EDTA-extractable fractions, which were consistently significant for δ(207Pb/206Pb) and δ(206Pb/204Pb) and partially significant for δ(208Pb/206Pb). This pattern points to a stronger influence of Pb incorporated in the silicate fraction on the isotopic composition of the bulk pool under uncontaminated conditions [88].
The observed isotopic variability reflected differences in the lithological backgrounds and histories of the sampling sites (Table S1). For example, the relatively high δ(87Sr/86Sr) in soil SL reflected weathering of the Carboniferous granite bedrock [38], while the elevated δ(87Sr/86Sr) in ST can be attributed to the influence of Rb-bearing minerals such as biotite and muscovite originating from the underlying mica-schist and paragneiss. In comparison, soils TU and MZ showed low δ(87Sr/86Sr) values due to carbonate- and siliciclastic-rich alluvial parent materials with low Rb/Sr ratios, as confirmed by their total soil composition (Table S1). The Pb isotope ratios of the contaminated soils AS and MZ were nearly identical across all methods (Table S10), reflecting a common geological influence linked to the extensive carbonate-hosted Pb-Zn mineralization prevalent in both regions [38, 89]. This deposit is characterized by a homogeneous Pb isotope composition [90], which appears to dominate the bioavailable Pb isotope signature of local soils. In contrast, soil PR had significantly higher δ(207Pb/206Pb) and δ(208Pb/206Pb) and lower δ(206Pb/204Pb) values (Table S10), reflecting vein-type mineralization and distinct anthropogenic inputs from historical Pb mining and smelting [17, 91, 92]. Despite the similarity in Pb isotope ratios between soils AS and MZ, their δ(87Sr/86Sr) values differed significantly (Table S10), enabling effective differentiation. This highlights the strength of a multi-isotope approach, where radiogenic Sr and Pb isotope signatures provide complementary information. Notably, both systems can be assessed simultaneously from the same sample using the TK100 DGT.
Relationship between DGT and plant Sr and Pb isotope ratios
To validate DGT as a proxy for radiogenic Sr and Pb isotope ratios in plants, it must be demonstrated that the DGT-labile pool accurately represents the isotopic composition of the fraction taken up by plants. If this relationship holds across different soil types and plant species, DGT can serve as a species-independent predictor of Sr and Pb isotope signatures in plants, eliminating the need for site-specific plant cultivation and analysis. As shown in Fig. 4, Sr and Pb isotope ratios in plant tissues closely matched those of the DGT-labile soil fractions, confirming that DGT provides a robust approach for predicting the radiogenic Sr and Pb isotope composition of plants across diverse soil-plant systems.
Fig. 4.
Relationship between Sr and Pb isotope ratios in DGT-labile soil fractions (y-axes) and those in plants (x-axes), including lettuce (shoot), wheat (shoot), and radish (shoot and bulb), for δ(87Sr/86Sr) (a–d), δ(207Pb/206Pb) (e–h), δ(208Pb/206Pb) (i–l), and δ(206Pb/204Pb) (m–p). Values are means (n = 3 for DGT, n = 4 for plants) ± U (k = 2). Dashed lines indicate the 1:1 relationship (= line of identity). Solid lines and grey areas in a–d indicate the linear regression curve and 95% confidence intervals, respectively. Exact δ-values and absolute Sr and Pb isotope ratios of plants are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S12, S13)
For Sr, δ(87Sr/86Sr) values in plants ranged from −1.12 to 13.4‰, with generally no significant differences between plant species or plant parts grown on the same soil (Table S12). Plant δ(87Sr/86Sr) values correlated strongly (p < 0.0001) with the TK100 DGT-labile soil fractions across all soils and plant species, as shown by R2 values > 0.999 and slopes close to 1 (Fig. 4a–d). This strong isotopic correlation contrasts with the lack of correlation between Sr mass fractions in plants and those in DGT-labile or extractable soil fractions (Table S8), indicating that, while Sr uptake is strongly influenced by soil physicochemical properties and plant physiological factors [78], the 87Sr/86Sr ratio remains a passive tracer of the bioavailable pool’s geochemical signature and is independent of the uptake magnitude. The close agreement in δ(87Sr/86Sr) between plant and TK100 DGT was also confirmed by the low isotopic difference (∆(87Sr/86Sr)DGT-plant = −0.26 ± 0.38‰; mean ± 2s, n = 20) across all soil-plant combinations (Fig. 5a, Table S14). Consequently, the radiogenic Sr isotope composition of plants was determined predominantly by the radiogenic isotopic signature of the labile Sr pool sampled by the TK100 DGT. Potential natural MDF, as previously reported for Sr uptake and translocation in plants [20], or diffusion, resin binding, and elution in different DGT methods [40, 93, 94], is further accounted for by internal correction of the 87Sr/86Sr ratio [57], providing an accurate reflection of the radiogenic isotope variations causing biogeochemical 87Sr/86Sr variability [21].
Fig. 5.

Isotopic differences, ∆(87Sr/86Sr)DGT-plant (a) and ∆(207Pb/206Pb)DGT-plant (b), between TK100 and/or Chelex DGT-labile soil fractions and plant tissues. Values are means ± U (k = 2). Grey areas indicate the average U (k = 2) of the shown ∆-values. Exact ∆-values, also including ∆(208Pb/206Pb)DGT-plant and ∆(206Pb/204Pb)DGT-plant, are provided in the Supplementary Information (Table S14)
For Pb, no regression was computed due to the limited sample size, with combined DGT-plant data being available for soils AS and MZ only (Table S10, Table S12). The data for lettuce, wheat, and radish grown on these soils demonstrated that δ(207Pb/206Pb), δ(208Pb/206Pb), and δ(206Pb/204Pb) in plant tissues agreed with those assessed by DGT with respect to the uncertainty (Fig. 4e–p). For the uncontaminated soils TU, SL, and ST, comparison of Pb isotope ratios in plants with EDTA-extractable and total fractions showed substantial offsets between −15.6 and 33.9‰ (Table S10, Table S12). Moreover, the Pb isotopic composition of these soils was characterized by high uncertainty due to large variability between the sample replicates, resulting in little isotopic differentiation between soils and especially plants grown on these soils (Table S10, Table S12). This indicates that Pb isotopes may have limited power for precise source tracing in uncontaminated soil-plant systems, where minor differences in soil homogeneity and plant uptake may cause substantial isotopic variability. In comparison, in the contaminated soils AS and MZ, the isotopic differences between DGT-labile soil fractions and plants were low, with average ∆(207Pb/206Pb)DGT-plant, ∆(208Pb/206Pb)DGT-plant, and ∆(206Pb/204Pb)DGT-plant values of 0.20 ± 0.19‰, 0.26 ± 0.16‰, and −0.31 ± 0.57‰ (mean ± 2s, n = 8) for TK100 DGT, and −0.11 ± 0.30‰, −0.11 ± 0.48‰, and 0.15 ± 0.36‰ (mean ± 2s, n = 8) for Chelex DGT, respectively (Fig. 5b, Table S14). Thus, the close agreement was independent of the DGT technique used, as evidenced by the low average difference between the TK100 and Chelex DGT of 0.07 ± 0.82‰ (expressed as ∆TK100 DGT−∆Chelex DGT; mean ± 2s, n = 24) across all assessed Pb isotope ratios. This demonstrates that plants accessed the same isotopically distinct labile Pb pools as those sampled by the DGT techniques and indicates that MDF during Pb translocation from soils AS and MZ to plants was not significant with respect to the uncertainty. Even within radish, large differences in Pb mass fractions between shoots and bulbs (Table S7) were not accompanied by significant isotopic differences (Fig. 5b, Table S12, Table S14), confirming the absence of relevant within-plant MDF under contaminated soil conditions.
From an applied perspective, these findings have direct relevance for applications such as food authentication, provenance tracing, and forensic case work, where bioavailable Sr and Pb isotope baselines are often based on the direct analysis of plant material [2, 25]. However, plants take up Sr and Pb from multiple and variably accessed soil layers, influenced by species-specific uptake or translocation processes, all of which can introduce variability and reduce isotopic discrimination power [14, 25, 26]. DGT, in contrast, provides a plant-independent assessment of the labile, bioavailable isotopic pool in soils, reducing biological and environmental variability while offering reproducible, low-uncertainty isotope ratios across soil types. This enables more standardized and representative assessments, supporting the establishment of robust bioavailable isotope baselines with improved comparability among sampling sites.
Conclusions
Radiogenic isotope signatures of bioavailable Sr and Pb in soils are powerful tracers of biogeochemical processes, contamination sources, and material provenance. Conventional extraction methods can access these signatures but are resource-intensive, lack mechanistic specificity, and yield complex solutions that complicate isotopic analysis. This study demonstrates that DGT provides an effective alternative. The isotope signatures of Sr and Pb in soils assessed by DGT were geochemically site-specific and closely mirrored those in plants, confirming that the DGT-labile pool reflects the isotopic composition available for plant uptake for both elements. Concomitantly, contrasting elemental mass uptake patterns revealed distinct mechanisms: Sr uptake showed no correlation with the DGT-labile fraction, indicating mass flow control, whereas Pb uptake followed DGT-labile concentrations, consistent with diffusion control. Together, these findings show that combining DGT with both elemental and isotopic analyses provides a mechanistic framework for a more comprehensive appreciation of metal bioavailability in soils.
Besides mechanistic insights, DGT provides several analytical and practical advantages. First, effective matrix reduction via selective sampling by DGT minimizes purification needs and analytical interferences. For Pb, DGT eluates were sufficiently clean for direct isotopic analysis, while Sr still required column purification but with substantially lower matrix loads than conventional extracts. Among the tested methods, the TK100 DGT proved most effective, enabling quantitative assessment of both isotopic systems from the same sample. Moreover, DGT offers strong potential for field applications: it is portable, low-waste, and minimally invasive, requiring only ~ 2 g of soil per sampler. It can be deployed in undisturbed field soils, preserving in situ conditions, and is well suited for spatially resolved isotope ratio analysis in heterogeneous or remote environments. These assets position DGT as a powerful tool for establishing bioavailable isotopic baselines and resolving mixed geogenic and anthropogenic sources often masked in bulk soil analyses. Future studies should extend its application across a wider range of natural soil-plant systems under field conditions to fully assess their potential for isotope tracing in environmental forensics, food authentication, and archaeological provenance research.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Supplementary file1 Additional details on laboratory procedures, solutions, and materials; total soil and extract digestion; plant sample preparation and digestion; matrix separation; optimization procedures of MC-ICP-MS measurements; characteristics of soils; background equivalent concentrations, limits of detection, and limits of quantification of TK100 and Chelex DGT; elution parameters of automated matrix separation; instrumental parameters of MC-ICP-MS measurements; elemental and isotope ratio analysis results of certified reference materials; Sr and Pb mass fractions in plant tissues; relationships between Sr plant uptake and soil bioavailability indices; Ca/Sr, Rb/Sr, and Ca/Pb mass fraction ratios in DGT eluates and extracts; relative and absolute Sr and Pb isotope ratios in DGT-labile, extractable, and total soil fractions; relative and absolute Sr and Pb isotope ratios in lettuce, wheat, and radish tissues; isotopic differences of Sr and Pb between DGT-labile soil fractions and plant tissues. (PDF 472 KB)
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Heribert Bauer, Wolfgang Friesl-Hanl, Christina Hummel, Domen Leštan, and Martina Vítková for their assistance with soil collection. We gratefully acknowledge Anika Retzmann for sharing her expertise on the prepFAST MC, as well as Anna Siebenbrunner and Antonia Siebenbrunner for preparing the soil sampling site map and assisting with the graphical abstract design. Laboratory support by Ara Bitar, Alexander Epov, Sarah Mühlbacher, Michael Schober, and Sara Widhalm is also sincerely appreciated.
Author contribution
Stefan Wagner: conceptualization, methodology, investigation, formal analysis, data curation, validation, visualization, project administration, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing
Jakob Santner: conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing—review and editing
Markus Puschenreiter: methodology, resources, writing—review and editing
Johanna Irrgeher: methodology, writing—review and editing
Thomas Prohaska: conceptualization, methodology, resources, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, writing—review and editing
Funding
Open access funding provided by Montanuniversität Leoben. This study was funded in whole or in part by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, Grant DOIs: 10.55776/P30085 and 10.55776/PIN8195924). Additional funding for JS was provided by the FWF and the Federal State of Lower Austria (P27571-BBL).
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval
This study did not involve humans or animals.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Johanna Irrgeher is a member of ABC’s International Advisory Board but was not involved in the peer review of this paper.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Reimann C, Flem B, Fabian K, Birke M, Ladenberger A, Négrel P, et al. Lead and lead isotopes in agricultural soils of Europe – the continental perspective. Appl Geochem. 2012;27(3):532–42. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bataille CP, Crowley BE, Wooller MJ, Bowen GJ. Advances in global bioavailable strontium isoscapes. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol. 2020;555: 109849. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhu X-K, Benefield J, Coplen TB, Gao Z, Holden NE. Variation of lead isotopic composition and atomic weight in terrestrial materials (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem. 2021;93(1):155–66. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Capo RC, Stewart BW, Chadwick OA. Strontium isotopes as tracers of ecosystem processes: theory and methods. Geoderma. 1998;82(1):197–225. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Banner JL. Radiogenic isotopes: systematics and applications to earth surface processes and chemical stratigraphy. Earth-Sci Rev. 2004;65(3):141–94. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Müller W, Fricke H, Halliday AN, McCulloch MT, Wartho JA. Origin and migration of the Alpine Iceman. Science. 2003;302(5646):862–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prohaska T, Wenzel WW, Stingeder G. ICP-MS-based tracing of metal sources and mobility in a soil depth profile via the isotopic variation of Sr and Pb. Int J Mass Spectrom. 2005;242(2):243–50. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haak W, Brandt G, Jong HNd, Meyer C, Ganslmeier R, Heyd V, et al. Ancient DNA, strontium isotopes, and osteological analyses shed light on social and kinship organization of the later stone age. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(47):18226–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cheng H, Hu Y. Lead (Pb) isotopic fingerprinting and its applications in lead pollution studies in China: a review. Environ Pollut. 2010;158(5):1134–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Coelho I, Castanheira I, Bordado JM, Donard O, Silva JAL. Recent developments and trends in the application of strontium and its isotopes in biological related fields. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2017;90:45–61. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wooller MJ, Bataille C, Druckenmiller P, Erickson GM, Groves P, Haubenstock N, et al. Lifetime mobility of an Arctic woolly mammoth. Science. 2021;373(6556):806–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miller EK, Blum JD, Friedland AJ. Determination of soil exchangeable-cation loss and weathering rates using Sr isotopes. Nature. 1993;362(6419):438–41. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chadwick OA, Derry LA, Bern CR, Vitousek PM. Changing sources of strontium to soils and ecosystems across the Hawaiian Islands. Chem Geol. 2009;267(1–2):64–76. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Aguzzoni A, Bassi M, Robatscher P, Tagliavini M, Tirler W, Scandellari F. Plant Sr isotope ratios as affected by the sr isotope ratio of the soil and of the external Sr inputs. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(40):10513–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Thomsen E, Andreasen R. Agricultural lime disturbs natural strontium isotope variations: implications for provenance and migration studies. Sci Adv. 2019;5(3):eaav8083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Prohaska T, Watkins M, Latkoczy C, Wenzel WW, Stingeder G. Lead isotope ratio analysis by inductively coupled plasma sector field mass spectrometry (ICP-SMS) in soil digests of a depth profile. J Anal At Spectrom. 2000;15(4):365–9. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ettler V, Mihaljevič M, Komárek M. ICP-MS measurements of lead isotopic ratios in soils heavily contaminated by lead smelting: tracing the sources of pollution. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004;378(2):311–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Žerdoner T, Burger J, Kranjc I, Turšič J, Zuliani T. Revealing long-term anthropogenic influence on PM10 through lead isotope signatures in a post-mining region. Atmos Environ. 2026;366:121666. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prohaska T, Irrgeher J, Zitek A, Jakubowski N (eds.). Sector field mass spectrometry for elemental and isotopic analysis. R Soc Chem. 2014;666. 10.1039/9781849735407.
- 20.Hajj F, Poszwa A, Bouchez J, Guérold F. Radiogenic and “stable” strontium isotopes in provenance studies: a review and first results on archaeological wood from shipwrecks. J Archaeol Sci. 2017;86:24–49. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hoogewerff JA, Reimann C, Ueckermann H, Frei R, Frei KM, van Aswegen T, et al. Bioavailable 87Sr/86Sr in European soils: a baseline for provenancing studies. Sci Total Environ. 2019;672:1033–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jung M-J, Jeong Y-J, Shin W-J, Cheong AC-s. Isotopic distribution of bioavailable Sr, Nd, and Pb in Chungcheongbuk-do Province, Korea. J Anal Sci Technol. 2024;15(1): 46. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hartman G, Richards M. Mapping and defining sources of variability in bioavailable strontium isotope ratios in the Eastern Mediterranean. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2014;126:250–64. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Büntgen U, Oulehle F, Oppenheimer C, Svoboda J, Erban Kochergina YV, Rybníček M, et al. Potential and limitations of strontium isotopic fingerprinting in wood. Geophys Res Lett. 2025;52(19):e2025GL117556. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Holt E, Evans JA, Madgwick R. Strontium (87Sr/86Sr) mapping: a critical review of methods and approaches. Earth Sci Rev. 2021;216: 103593. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Erban Kochergina YV, Novak M, Erban V, Stepanova M. 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios in trees as an archaeological tracer: limitations of linking plant-biomass and bedrock Sr isotope signatures. J Archaeol Sci. 2021. 10.1016/j.jas.2021.105438. [Google Scholar]
- 27.DIN ISO 19730. Bodenbeschaffenheit - Extraktion von Spurenelementen aus Böden mit Ammoniumnitratlösung (ISO 19730:2008) 2009. Available from: https://shop.austrian-standards.at/action/de/public/details/338432/DIN_ISO_19730_2009_07. Accessed 8 Nov 2021.
- 28.Blum WEH, Spiegel H, Wenzel WW. Bodenzustandsinventur: Konzeption, Durchführung und Bewertung ; Empfehlungen zur Vereinheitlichung der Vorgangsweise in Österreich. Vienna: Inst. für Bodenforschung, Univ. für Bodenkultur Wien u.a.; 1996. p. 102. https://permalink.obvsg.at/AC01691378.
- 29.Austrian Standards International. ÖNORM L 1089: Chemische Bodenuntersuchungen - Extraktion von Schwermetallen mittels EDTA 2014. Available from: https://shop.austrian-standards.at/action/de/public/details/529745/OENORM_L_1089_2014_11_01. Accessed 14 Jul 2023.
- 30.Swoboda S, Brunner M, Boulyga SF, Galler P, Horacek M, Prohaska T. Identification of Marchfeld asparagus using Sr isotope ratio measurements by MC-ICP-MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008;390(2):487–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brunner M, Katona R, Stefánka Z, Prohaska T. Determination of the geographical origin of processed spice using multielement and isotopic pattern on the example of Szegedi paprika. Eur Food Res Technol. 2010;231(4):623–34. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aguzzoni A, Bassi M, Pignotti E, Robatscher P, Scandellari F, Tirler W, et al. Sr isotope composition of Golden Delicious apples in Northern Italy reflects the soil 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the cultivation area. J Sci Food Agric. 2020;100(9):3666–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Degryse F, Smolders E, Zhang H, Davison W. Predicting availability of mineral elements to plants with the DGT technique: a review of experimental data and interpretation by modelling. Environ Chem. 2009;6(3):198–218. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang H, Davison W. Use of diffusive gradients in thin-films for studies of chemical speciation and bioavailability. Environ Chem. 2015;12(2):85–101. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Guan D-X, He S-X, Li G, Teng HH, Ma LQ. Application of diffusive gradients in thin-films technique for speciation, bioavailability, modeling and mapping of nutrients and contaminants in soils. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 2021. 10.1080/10643389.2021.1900765. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Luo J, Cheng H, Ren J, Davison W, Zhang H. Mechanistic insights from DGT and soil solution measurements on the uptake of Ni and Cd by radish. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(13):7305–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hanousek O, Santner J, Mason S, Berger TW, Wenzel WW, Prohaska T. Diffusive gradients in thin films measurement of sulfur stable isotope variations in labile soil sulfate. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(29):8333–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wagner S, Santner J, Irrgeher J, Puschenreiter M, Happel S, Prohaska T. Selective diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT) for the simultaneous assessment of labile Sr and Pb concentrations and isotope ratios in soils. Anal Chem. 2022;94(16):6338–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hanousek O, Mason S, Santner J, Chowdhury MMA, Berger TW, Prohaska T. Novel diffusive gradients in thin films technique to assess labile sulfate in soil. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(24):6759–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yin H, Yao H, Yuan W, Lin C-J, Fu X, Yin R, et al. Determination of the isotopic composition of aqueous mercury in a paddy ecosystem using diffusive gradients in thin films. Anal Chem. 2023;95(33):12290–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yin H, Yao H, Meng B, Lin C-J, Yuan W, Yin R, et al. Sources and transformation of methylmercury in paddy water: insights from mercury isotopes collected by diffusive gradients in thin films. Anal Chem. 2025;97(17):9183–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhang H, Davison W. Performance characteristics of diffusion gradients in thin films for the in situ measurement of trace metals in aqueous solution. Anal Chem. 1995;67(19):3391–400. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Brand WA, Coplen TB, Vogl J, Rosner M, Prohaska T. Assessment of international reference materials for isotope-ratio analysis (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl Chem. 2014;86(3):425–67. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Friesl W, Friedl J, Platzer K, Horak O, Gerzabek MH. Remediation of contaminated agricultural soils near a former Pb/Zn smelter in Austria: batch, pot and field experiments. Environ Pollut. 2006;144(1):40–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lestan D. Novel chelant-based washing method for soil contaminated with Pb and other metals: a pilot-scale study. Land Degrad Dev. 2017;28(8):2585–95. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Vítková M, Puschenreiter M, Komárek M. Effect of nano zero-valent iron application on As, Cd, Pb, and Zn availability in the rhizosphere of metal(loid) contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2018;200:217–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Austrian Standards International. ÖNORM L 1080: Chemische Bodenuntersuchungen - Bestimmung des organischen Kohlenstoffs durch trockene Verbrennung mit und ohne Berücksichtigung von Carbonaten 2013. Available from: https://www.austrian-standards.at/de/shop/onorm-l-1080-2013-03-15~p1993883. Accessed 2 Mar 2020.
- 48.OneGeology. Europe GISEurope 1:1.5M Bedrock Age 2025. Available from: https://portal.onegeology.org/OnegeologyGlobal/. Accessed 20 Aug 2025.
- 49.Zhou C, van de Velde S, Baeyens W, Gao Y. Comparison of Chelex based resins in diffusive gradients in thin-film for high resolution assessment of metals. Talanta. 2018;186:397–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Doolette CL, Howard DL, Afshar N, Kewish CM, Paterson DJ, Huang J, et al. Tandem probe analysis mode for synchrotron XFM: doubling throughput capacity. Anal Chem. 2022;94(11):4584–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chang L-Y, Davison W, Zhang H, Kelly M. Performance characteristics for the measurement of Cs and Sr by diffusive gradients in thin films (DGT). Anal Chim Acta. 1998;368(3):243–53. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Devillers D, Buzier R, Charriau A, Guibaud G. Improving elution strategies for Chelex®-DGT passive samplers. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(30):7183–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Oorts K, Smolders E, Lanno R, Chowdhury MJ. Bioavailability and ecotoxicity of lead in soil: implications for setting ecological soil quality standards. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021;40(7):1948–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Retzmann A, Zimmermann T, Pröfrock D, Prohaska T, Irrgeher J. A fully automated simultaneous single-stage separation of Sr, Pb, and Nd using DGA resin for the isotopic analysis of marine sediments. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(23):5463–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zimmermann T, Retzmann A, Schober M, Pröfrock D, Prohaska T, Irrgeher J. Matrix separation of Sr and Pb for isotopic ratio analysis of Ca-rich samples via an automated simultaneous separation procedure. Spectrochim Acta B At Spectrosc. 2019;151:54–64. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Irrgeher J, Prohaska T, Sturgeon RE, Mester Z, Yang L. Determination of strontium isotope amount ratios in biological tissues using MC-ICPMS. Anal Methods. 2013;5(7):1687–94. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Horsky M, Irrgeher J, Prohaska T. Evaluation strategies and uncertainty calculation of isotope amount ratios measured by MC ICP-MS on the example of Sr. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(2):351–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Rodushkin I, Pallavicini N, Engström E, Sörlin D, Öhlander B, Ingri J, et al. Assessment of the natural variability of B, Cd, Cu, Fe, Pb, Sr, Tl and Zn concentrations and isotopic compositions in leaves, needles and mushrooms using single sample digestion and two-column matrix separation. J Anal At Spectrom. 2016;31(1):220–33. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kragten J. Tutorial review. Calculating standard deviations and confidence intervals with a universally applicable spreadsheet technique. Analyst. 1994;119(10):2161–5. [Google Scholar]
- 60.Linsinger T. Application Note 1 - Comparison of a measurement result with the certified value Geel: European Commission - Joint Research Centre Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (IRMM); 2010. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/erm_application_note_1_en.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2021.
- 61.Kabata-Pendias A. Trace elements in soils and plants (4th ed.). CRC Press; 2011. p. 534. 10.1201/b10158.
- 62.Tommasini S, Marchionni S, Tescione I, Casalini M, Braschi E, Avanzinelli R, et al. Strontium isotopes in biological material: a key tool for the geographic traceability of foods and humans beings. In: Gupta DK, Walther C, editors., et al., Behaviour of strontium in plants and the environment. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 145–66. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Austrian Standards International. ÖNORM L 1075: Principles for the evaluation of the content of selected chemical elements in soils 2017. Available from: https://www.austrian-standards.at/en/shop/onorm-l-1075-2017-11-01~p2341253. Accessed 16 Jul 2025.
- 64.Degryse F, Waegeneers N, Smolders E. Labile lead in polluted soils measured by stable isotope dilution. Eur J Soil Sci. 2007;58(1):1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Garmo ØA, Røyset O, Steinnes E, Flaten TP. Performance study of diffusive gradients in thin films for 55 elements. Anal Chem. 2003;75(14):3573–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Amelung W, Blume H-P, Fleige H, Horn R, Kandeler E, Kögel-Knabner I, et al. Scheffer/Schachtschabel Lehrbuch der Bodenkunde (17th ed.). Heidelberg: Springer Spektrum Berlin; 2018. p. 750. 10.1007/978-3-662-55871-3.
- 67.Bio-Rad. Chelex 100 and Chelex 20 chelating ion exchange resin instruction manual: bio-rad laboratories; 2020. Available from: https://www.bio-rad.com/webroot/web/pdf/lsr/literature/LIT200.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2025.
- 68.Tye AM, Young S, Crout NMJ, Zhang H, Preston S, Zhao FJ, et al. Speciation and solubility of Cu, Ni and Pb in contaminated soils. Eur J Soil Sci. 2004;55(3):579–90. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Lehto NJ. Principles and application in soils and sediments. In: Davison W, editor. Diffusive gradients in thin-films for environmental measurements. Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. pp. 146–73.
- 70.Puy J, Galceran J, Rey-Castro C. Interpreting the DGT measurement. In: Davison W, editor. Diffusive gradients in thin-films for environmental measurements. Cambridge Environmental Chemistry Series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2016. pp. 66–92.
- 71.Neumann G, Römheld V. Chapter 14 - rhizosphere chemistry in relation to plant nutrition. In: Marschner P, editor. Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. p. 347–68. 10.1016/B978-0-12-384905-2.00014-5.
- 72.Hoefer C, Santner J, Borisov SM, Wenzel WW, Puschenreiter M. Integrating chemical imaging of cationic trace metal solutes and pH into a single hydrogel layer. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;950:88–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bilyera N, Hummel C, Daudin G, Santangeli M, Zhang X, Santner J, et al. Co-localised phosphorus mobilization processes in the rhizosphere of field-grown maize jointly contribute to plant nutrition. Soil Biol Biochem. 2022;165:108497. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gaw SK, Kim ND, Northcott GL, Wilkins AL, Robinson G. Uptake of ΣDDT, arsenic, cadmium, copper, and lead by lettuce and radish grown in contaminated horticultural soils. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(15):6584–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Noller C, Friesl-Hanl W, Hood-Nowotny R, Watzinger A. Remediating garden soils: EDTA-soil washing and safe vegetable production in raised bed gardens. Toxics. 2022;10(11):652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 76.Elgawhary SM, Malzer GL, Barber SA. Calcium and strontium transport to plant roots. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1972;36(5):794–9. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Berger TW, Swoboda S, Prohaska T, Glatzel G. The role of calcium uptake from deep soils for spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica). For Ecol Manag. 2006;229(1):234–46. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Burger A, Lichtscheidl I. Strontium in the environment: review about reactions of plants towards stable and radioactive strontium isotopes. Sci Total Environ. 2019;653:1458–512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Kodithuwakku K, Huang J, Doolette CL, Mason S, Boland J, Lehto NJ, et al. Plant responses to nitrate and ammonium availability in Australian soils as measured by diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) and KCl extraction. Geoderma. 2024;449: 116997. [Google Scholar]
- 80.European Commission. Commission regulation (EU) 2023/915, on maximum levels for certain contaminants in food and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 2023. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R0915. Accessed 16 Apr 2025.
- 81.Trimmel S, Wagner S, Feiner L, Feiner M, Haluza D, Hood-Nowotny R, et al. Compost amendment in urban gardens: elemental and isotopic analysis of soils and vegetable tissues. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024;31(34):47022–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wang Y, Shen H, Xu L, Zhu X, Li C, Zhang W, et al. Transport, ultrastructural localization, and distribution of chemical forms of lead in radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 83.Kopittke PM, Asher CJ, Kopittke RA, Menzies NW. Toxic effects of Pb2+ on growth of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Environ Pollut. 2007;150(2):280–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Yan K, Dong Z, Wijayawardena MAA, Liu Y, Naidu R, Semple K. Measurement of soil lead bioavailability and influence of soil types and properties: a review. Chemosphere. 2017;184:27–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tandy S, Bossart K, Mueller R, Ritschel J, Hauser L, Schulin R, et al. Extraction of heavy metals from soils using biodegradable chelating agents. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(3):937–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Minami M, Suzuki K. 87Sr/86Sr compositional linkage between geological and biological materials: a case study from the Toyota granite region of Japan. Chem Geol. 2018;484:224–32. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Chenery SR, Izquierdo M, Marzouk E, Klinck B, Palumbo-Roe B, Tye AM. Soil–plant interactions and the uptake of Pb at abandoned mining sites in the Rookhope catchment of the N. Pennines, UK — a Pb isotope study. Sci Total Environ. 2012;433:547–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Li HB, Yu S, Li GL, Deng H, Luo XS. Contamination and source differentiation of Pb in park soils along an urban–rural gradient in Shanghai. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(12):3536–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Melcher F, Onuk P. Potential of critical high-technology metals in Eastern alpine base metal sulfide ores. BHM Berg Huttenmann Monatsh. 2019;164(2):71–6. [Google Scholar]
- 90.Henjes-Kunst E. The Pb-Zn deposits in the Drau Range (Eastern Alps, Austria/Slovenia): a multi-analytical research approach for investigation of the ore-forming mechanisms [Doctoral Thesis]. Leoben: Technical University of Leoben; 2014. Available from: https://pureadmin.unileoben.ac.at/ws/portalfiles/portal/2404254/AC11823328n01vt.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2026.
- 91.Dolníček Z, Ulmanová J, Sejkora J, Knížek F, Škácha P. Mineralogy and genesis of the Pb-Zn-Sb-Ag vein H32A in the Příbram uranium and base-metal district, Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic. Ore Geol Rev. 2023;162:105695. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ettler Vc, Legendre O, Bodénan Fo, Touray J-C. Primary phases and natural weathering of old lead-zinc pyrometallurgical slag from Príbram, Czech Republic. Can Mineral. 2001;39(3):873–88. [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rodushkin I, Stenberg A, Andrén H, Malinovsky D, Baxter DC. Isotopic fractionation during diffusion of transition metal ions in solution. Anal Chem. 2004;76(7):2148–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Desaulty A-M, Méheut M, Guerrot C, Berho C, Millot R. Coupling DGT passive samplers and multi-collector ICP-MS: a new tool to measure Pb and Zn isotopes composition in dilute aqueous solutions. Chem Geology. 2016;450(Supplement C):122–34. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supplementary file1 Additional details on laboratory procedures, solutions, and materials; total soil and extract digestion; plant sample preparation and digestion; matrix separation; optimization procedures of MC-ICP-MS measurements; characteristics of soils; background equivalent concentrations, limits of detection, and limits of quantification of TK100 and Chelex DGT; elution parameters of automated matrix separation; instrumental parameters of MC-ICP-MS measurements; elemental and isotope ratio analysis results of certified reference materials; Sr and Pb mass fractions in plant tissues; relationships between Sr plant uptake and soil bioavailability indices; Ca/Sr, Rb/Sr, and Ca/Pb mass fraction ratios in DGT eluates and extracts; relative and absolute Sr and Pb isotope ratios in DGT-labile, extractable, and total soil fractions; relative and absolute Sr and Pb isotope ratios in lettuce, wheat, and radish tissues; isotopic differences of Sr and Pb between DGT-labile soil fractions and plant tissues. (PDF 472 KB)
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


