TABLE V.
Adaptability of the LeqMod to different denoising baselines.
| GAN | SwinUNETR | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NRMSE (↓) | TLG bias (%) (o) | NRMSE (↓) | TLG bias (%) (o) | ||||||
| w/o | w | w/o | w | w/o | w | w/o | w | ||
| Quadra | 1% | 0.273 | 0.266 † | −5.115 | −4.444 † | 0.294 | 0.284 † | −7.395 | −5.304 † |
| 2% | 0.252 | 0.234 † | −4.092 | −3.376 † | 0.240 | 0.231 † | −5.617 | −3.889 † | |
| 5% | 0.196 | 0.194 | −2.592 | −2.328 † | 0.207 | 0.216 | −4.244 | −2.980 † | |
| 10% | 0.178 | 0.169 † | −1.787 | −1.583 † | 0.184 | 0.180 | −3.312 | −2.133 † | |
| 25% | 0.146 | 0.131 † | −1.035 | −0.879 † | 0.173 | 0.137 † | −2.193 | −1.163 † | |
| 50% | 0.100 | 0.094 | −0.699 | −0.610 | 0.140 | 0.114 † | −2.095 | −0.964 † | |
| uExplorer | 1% | 0.551 | 0.536 † | −13.231 | −9.671 † | 0.574 | 0.555 † | −15.354 | −13.586 † |
| 2% | 0.439 | 0.432 † | −8.601 | −6.696 † | 0.453 | 0.440 † | −11.286 | −8.921 † | |
| 5% | 0.354 | 0.353 † | −4.869 | −4.163 † | 0.371 | 0.349 † | −7.069 | −5.080 † | |
| 10% | 0.284 | 0.274 † | −3.285 | −3.092 † | 0.303 | 0.294 † | −5.371 | −3.672 † | |
| 25% | 0.213 | 0.224 | −1.800 | −1.679 † | 0.231 | 0.226 † | −3.721 | −2.249 † | |
| 50% | 0.153 | 0.142 † | −1.016 | −1.028 | 0.182 | 0.165 † | −2.805 | −1.351 † | |
| mCT | 5% | 0.538 | 0.527 † | −8.466 | −7.428 † | 0.531 | 0.524 † | −8.485 | −7.507 † |
| 10% | 0.523 | 0.449 † | −5.828 | −5.056 † | 0.459 | 0.430 † | −6.070 | −4.990 † | |
| 20% | 0.344 | 0.339 † | −3.604 | −3.037 | 0.361 | 0.348 † | −4.187 | −3.712 | |
P<0.05 based on the Wilcoxon signed-rank test between the w/o and w LeqMod groups.
(↓) and (o) represent expecting lower and zero-approaching values, respectively.