Skip to main content
. 2026 Jan 24;26:261. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-14086-0

Table 2.

Impacts of perceived COVID-19 risks on households’ unmet needs during the first wave of the pandemic (April-August 2020) in Nigeria

Variables Unmet Needsβ
Coefficient (95%CI)
During lockdownθ

-0.07

(-0.21–0.08)

After lockdownθ

-0.08

(-0.18–0.02)

(Medium-risk vs. Low-risk)α × During lockdownθ

0.15*

(-0.01–0.31)

(High-risk vs. Low-risk)α × During lockdownθ

0.10

(-0.07–0.27)

(Epicentre vs. Low-risk)α × During lockdownθ

0.25*

(-0.04–0.53)

(Medium-risk vs. Low-risk)α × After lockdownθ

0.01

(-0.10–0.12)

(High-risk vs. Low-risk)α × After lockdownθ

0.03

(-0.09–0.15)

(Epicentre vs. Low-risk)α × After lockdownθ

0.24**

(0.02–0.46)

Household Fixed Effects Yes
Number of observations 3,689
Number of households 1,509
R-squared 0.03

Notes: Estimations are based on Nigeria GHSP 2019 and 2020 NLPS Round 1

αRepresents the treatment variable assigned with the value of 0 for households in the states with low-risk of COVID-19 infection (number of cases < 100) (as the control group) and 1 for households in the medium-risk (100 ≥ number of cases < 1,000), high-risk (1,000 ≥ number of cases < 10,000), or epicentre state (Lagos State with number of cases > 10,000) (as the treated groups)

θRepresents three periods: before lockdown (January–February 2019), during lockdown (April-May 2020), and after lockdown (June–August 2020). In the difference-in-differences estimation, the period before lockdown is the base period

P values: *** p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.10

β95% CIs are shown in parentheses

Robust standard errors were clustered at the enumeration area (EA)