Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Synth Biol. 2025 May 9;14(6):2170–2180. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5c00085

A Hot-Swappable Genetic Switch: Building an Inducible and Trackable Functional Assay for the Essential Gene MEDIATOR 21

Isabella J Watson 1, Cassandra Maranas 2, Jennifer L Nemhauser 3, Alexander R Leydon 4,*
PMCID: PMC12911314  NIHMSID: NIHMS2139575  PMID: 40340410

Abstract

Essential genes, estimated to be approximately 20% of the Arabidopsis genome, are broadly expressed and required for reproductive success. They are difficult to study, as interfering with their function leads to premature death. Transcription is one of the essential functions of life, and the multiprotein Mediator complex coordinates the regulation of gene expression at nearly every eukaryotic promoter. In this study, we focused on a core mediator component called MEDIATOR21 (MED21), which is required for activation of transcription. Our previous work has also shown a role for MED21 in repression of gene expression through its interaction with a corepressor protein. Here, we sought to differentiate the role MED21 plays in activation versus repression using the model plant Arabidopsis. As mutations in MED21 lead to embryo-lethal phenotypes, we constructed a set of synthetic switches using PhiC31 serine integrases to create an “on-to-off” inducible loss-of-function MED21 in a nonessential tissue. Our technology, which we call Integrase Erasers, enabled med21 mutant plants to survive into adulthood by ablating protein expression selectively in lateral root primordia, allowing quantification and characterization of med21 mutant phenotypes in a postembryonic context. In addition, we engineered chemical induction of the Integrase Eraser to ablate MED21 expression in whole seedlings at a user-specified time point. Finally, we extended this technology to build a hot-swappable Integrase Isoform Switch where expression of the integrase toggled cells from expressing wild-type MED21 to expressing MED21 sequence variants. Our analysis of the entire set of new integrase-based tools demonstrates that this is a highly efficient and robust approach to the study of essential genes.

Keywords: synthetic biology, integrases, MED21, inducible knockouts, variant switching

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-2139575-f0005.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Essential genes perform functions required for survival. They are also likely to be broadly expressed, show up as hubs in protein networks, and be components of stable complexes with other biomolecules.13 Examples like general transcription factors (GTFs) and the Mediator complex play significant roles in regulating transcription at most genes via interactions with gene-specific DNA-binding transcription factors.47 The difficulty in assigning function to mediator subunits is well-documented in plants.4,5,8,9 Previously, we reported that the activity of the plant corepressor TOPLESS (TPL) depends on interaction with the mediator complex through direct contact with the middle domain subunit MEDIATOR21 (MED21).10,11 One consequence of the embryo-lethal phenotype of med21 loss of function mutants12 has been difficulty differentiating its mechanism of action during gene activation versus gene repression.

There are several approaches that have been employed to study essential genes in yeast, such as temperature-sensitive alleles,13 chemically induced nuclear depletion (anchor away),14 and auxin-induced degradation (AID).15 Adaptations of these approaches have been employed in plants,1618 yet the majority of essential genes have been characterized by the embryo-lethal phenotypes found in T-DNA insertion mutants.19 Recent advances in the application and optimization of serine integrase activity in Arabidopsis thaliana provide an alternative means to efficiently, precisely, and irreversibly alter relatively large genomic regions.

Serine integrases, hereafter termed integrases, induce recombination events at asymmetric DNA sequences that are specific to each integrase. Two integrases, Bxb1 and PhiC31, were recently optimized to build a modular toolkit for Arabidopsis.20 In that work, the integrase target site contained a ubiquitous promoter flanked by integrase sites, such that expression of the cognate integrase switched expression from one fluorescent protein to another. Further work using more complicated target design and cell-type-specific developmental promoters allowed order-of-expression cell lineage tracing.22

Here, we extended the work on initial integrase prototypes20 to study the essential gene MEDIATOR21 (MED21). We constructed an “on-to-off” inducible loss-of-function integrase target, which we term an Integrase Eraser. This target switches expression from MED21 to a fluorescent reporter, thereby permanently labeling cells with altered genomes. We tested target behavior using two different PhiC31 expression schemes in planta: (1) an integrase driver that induces loss of function specifically in lateral root primordia and (2) an inducible integrase driver that enables synchronized switching in all cells at a given time point. By expression of these constructs in a med21 mutant plant in combination with the MED21 target, both approaches successfully circumvent the embryonic lethal phenotype. In addition, we engineered an “isoform switch” integrase target, where MED21 is expressed as a P2A-linked self-cleaving fusion with a fluorescent protein, differentially marking cells expressing wild-type or mutant isoform. This new collection of tools, and the ready adaptation of its components to most contexts of potential interest, unlocks the study of essential genes in postembryonic plants while specifically advancing our understanding of the Mediator complex in coordinating transcriptional regulation.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To better understand the function of MED21 in Arabidopsis, we built a synthetic circuit that would allow for selective loss of MED21 function in lateral roots, a nonessential organ. This Integrase Eraser technology is composed of two parts: an “onto-off” inducible loss-of-function integrase target and a driver line that expresses the PhiC31 integrase from a cell-type-specific promoter, pGATA23. To build our target, we adapted a golden gate assembly approach from Guiziou et al.,20 that yielded a final construct with a constitutive promoter (pUBQ10) flanked by integrase sites, positioned between a wild-type copy of MED21 fused to an HA epitope tag and a reporter gene (mScarlet) (Figure 1A, Plasmid Map pNL3779). We also cloned a version of the target lacking the HA tag to control for effects of tag placement on the MED21 protein (Plasmid Map pNL3857). Both constructs were transformed into a heterozygous T-DNA loss-of-function med211 mutant. The target constitutively complements the loss of MED21 until the integrase is active, so it is transformed into mutant plants before the introduction of the driver line (Figure 1B). All cells where the integrase mediates an inversion in the target (a “switch”) are marked by the expression of mScarlet (Figure 1B, lower arrows). Therefore, the presence of mScarlet indicates the loss of wild-type MED21 activity (Figure 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Engineering and rapid prototyping of the integrase eraser approach. (A) Cloning strategy based on (Guiziou et al.20) for the target integrase target with BsaI adapters highlighted for use in golden gate cloning strategies, see Plasmid Maps. (B) Design of the integrase target. The target is composed of two PhiC31 integrase sites (triangles) surrounding a constitutive promoter (pUBQ10), the rescue coding sequence for MED21:6xHA and the fluorescent reporter (mScarlet). In the absence of integrase, MED21:6xHA is expressed. In the presence of integrase, the integrase mediates inversion of the DNA between the integrase sites, inverting the promoter and leading to mScarlet expression. The expression of the integrase is mediated by the selected promoter selected. (C) Rapid prototyping of the MED21 Eraser target in transient transfections of Nicotiana benthamiana at 2 days after injection. On the left side is a control target that switches from mTurquoise to mScarlet alone (top) and with a p35S:PhiC31 construct (bottom). On the right side shows the MED21 target alone (top) and MED21:HA target with a p35S:PhiC31 construct (bottom). The BFP channel for the MED21:HA is shown to demonstrate the level of background expected for the BFP channel in the negative control. Microscopy images were taken on a 20x objective to allow a wide view of switching efficiency, and the 50-μm scale bar in the RFP channels applies to all paired BFP images.

We used rapid prototyping in Nicotiana benthamiana to test the functionality of the MED21 Integrase Eraser target. As a control, we used a previously characterized target that switches from mTurquoise to mScarlet in the presence of the PhiC31 integrase expressed from the strong viral 35S promoter (Figure 1C). Without the addition of PhiC31 integrase, no mScarlet was detected for either the control or MED21 Eraser targets, indicating no stochastic switching occurred. In contrast, in the presence of PhiC31, we observed the presence of cells that expressed nuclear mScarlet. These results confirmed that the MED21 Integrase Eraser was functional and specific.

Next, we generated stable transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the MED21 Integrase Eraser constructs. We first focused on erasing MED21 activity during lateral root initiation, a well-characterized example of de novo organogenesis (Banda et al., 2019).21 Lateral roots are an attractive candidate for this Integrase Eraser technology, as they are not required for plants to survive in controlled environments like growth rooms or greenhouses. Thus, the impact of losing essential gene function can be studied while maintaining largely wild-type levels of plant health and reproductive fitness. Lateral roots develop from a small subset of the xylem pole pericycle (XPP) termed founder cells. GATA TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 23 (GATA23) is strongly and largely specifically expressed in these founder cells, setting into motion the series of asymmetric cell divisions that form the new root.23 Previous use of a pGATA23 integrase driver produced many lines with switching only in cells in the lateral root, that is, cells from a lineage involving GATA23 expression.20 Our use of this same promoter in the MED21 Integrase Eraser should “erase” MED21 in all of the cells that compose the lateral roots (Figure 2A, red lateral roots). It has been recently demonstrated that Arabidopsis promoters behave in a predominantly unidirectional manner,24 and we ensured that pUBQ10 behaved unidirectionally in the context of the integrase target. Indeed, in all MED21 eraser lines, we observed no detectable expression of the upstream RFP gene by microscopy (0/43 MED21:HA target, 0/49 MED21 target) in plants that do not carry an integrase expression construct. We confirmed this by RT-qPCR and observed no detectable expression of the RFP at the molecular level in the absence of the integrase (Figure S1A,B). These results demonstrate that pUBQ10 acts as a strong unidirectional promoter, consistent with our other implementations in Arabidopsis.20,22

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Cell-type-specific integrase eraser implemented in lateral root primordium results in MED21 loss of function and increases in lateral root initiation. (A) Schematic of the predicted behavior for the MED21 eraser approach. Lateral root primordium cells (red) will lose expression of the rescue construct, rendering them an effective knockout for MED21. (B–J) Confocal microscopy analysis of the wild-type control switch (from Figure 1C) and MED21 eraser lateral root initiation. All scale bars are 50 μm. (J) Still image from Supplemental Movie 1 of the root growth phenotype of MED21 eraser lines compared to the wild type at day 11. (K) Whole seedling epifluorescent image of MED21 eraser lines at day 14. Images have been color inverted to allow visualization of the short root phenotype. Natural autofluorescence was captured for whole seedlings on plates, allowing all root tissue to be observed. (L) Lateral root lengths were quantified at day 14 from individual selected T2 lines for each eraser type. The experiment was performed in triplicate for each genotype, with 6 seedlings per plate (n = 18 per genotype, at least 180 lateral roots per genotype). (M) Auxin-induced degradation of IAA14 is strictly required for the initiation of lateral root development. IAA14 recruits TPL, which in turn inhibits the mediator complex through interaction with MED21. Cartoon is modified from ref 10. (N) Lateral root density over time for MED21:HA eraser lines. Data are presented as means ± standard error. The experiment was performed in triplicate for each genotype, with 6 seedlings per plate (n = 18 per genotype). (O) Lateral root density at day 14 of growth for the MED21:HA eraser lines. Each gray color represents an individual lateral root density from 4 to 6 independent lines and is representative of the day 14 data from N. (P) Lateral roots of all stages (emerged and nonemerged) were quantified in homozygous mutant lines at day 14. For (L,O,P), letters indicate significant difference (ANOVA and Tukey HSD multiple comparison test; p < 0.001).

After introducing the pGATA23::PhiC31 driver into med211 plants complemented by the MED21 eraser target (Figure 1B), we identified lines with mScarlet expression predominantly restricted to the lateral roots (Figure 2B; 5 independent MED21:6xHA eraser lines and 9 independent untagged MED21 eraser lines), and compared these to the control switch (Figure 1C) through confocal microscopy. All selected lines demonstrated essentially wild-type pre-emergence lateral root development (Figure 2BG; stages I–VII). However, the loss of MED21 did lead to mild disruptions of architecture in postemergence roots. As early as 10 days post germination (dpg), we observed that MED21 eraser lateral roots had larger root cap zones and abnormally shaped root hairs (Figure 2HI), as well as a reduced length compared with our wild-type controls (Figure 2J). The latter phenotype was even more striking at 14 dpg (Figure 2K,L). Dynamic tracking of lateral root development over 16 days (Supplemental Video 1) highlights the impact of loss of MED21 activity. We observed switching primarily from the early stages of the lateral root initiation; however, we observed some nuclear RFP signal in the plant pericycle outside the developing lateral root, especially in older roots, consistent with the pGATA23 promoter’s native expression behavior. Therefore, in future implementations, the pGATA32 promoter could be tuned to reduce integrase activity to improve specificity through the inclusion of protein degrons to the integrase, or RNA destabilization tags (DSTs) to its transcript.20 Importantly, we also observed no evidence of bidirectional transcription of the MED21:HA gene in dissected lateral root cells that have fully switched to the reverse orientation (Figure S1A,C), again supporting the conclusion that pUBQ10 is unidirectional. If a target needed to have an excisable portion, for example, to eliminate low levels of transcription that may occur in unforeseen circumstances, the reorientation of the target sites to face in the same direction would allow construction of a guaranteed “zero background” integrase target site (Figure S1D).

Previous work has shown that the corepressor TPL interacts with the Mediator complex directly through contacts with MED2110 (Figure 2N). The interaction between the Mediator complex and TPL is critical in maintaining repression of transcription in yeast and plants.10,11 One of the best-studied TPL-regulated pathways is auxin response.25 In low auxin environments, the TPX family (TPL/TPRs) inhibits the activity of auxin response factor (ARF) transcriptional activators through the mutual binding of Aux/IAA proteins (AUXIN/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID). When auxin levels rise, Aux/IAA proteins are degraded, disrupting the connection between ARF and TPX proteins, thereby activating expression of ARF target genes.26 Following this logic, loss of MED21 should reduce TPL activity and phenocopy the addition of auxin. In lateral roots, the loss of MED21 should therefore promote initiation, an auxin-regulated process (Figure 2M). To test our model, we performed a time course growth analysis of MED21:HA eraser lines to determine whether lateral roots were initiated more frequently than controls (lateral root density, Figure 2N). We observed that over time, the MED21:HA eraser lines did indeed have a higher lateral root density than wild-type controls (Figure 2N,O). When we included pre-emergence lateral roots, this trend was even more clear (Figure 2P).

To enable loss of MED21 activity throughout the plant at a specific time point, we engineered a chemically inducible MED21 Eraser (iEraser) (Figure 3A). To do this, we replaced pGATA23 with the well-characterized β-estradiol system, as it is small, fast-acting in nearly every plant cell after treatment, and is fully orthogonal to known plant hormones.20,27 We used our MED21:HA target for these experiments, as it functioned similarly to untagged MED21 (Figure 2) and makes it possible to assay protein levels. Complemented med211, MED21:HA Eraser lines were transformed with -estradiol::PhiC31 and characterized for any leakiness in the expression of the integrase to eliminate these lines from further analysis (Figure S2AC). Progeny from selected transformants (T2 plants) were then transplanted onto estradiol plates for analysis. By 48 h, we observed strong and specific induction of MED21:HA switching only in seedlings exposed to β-estradiol (Figure 3B,C). We defined a seedling as having switched when nuclear RFP was detected in the root tip region by microscopy and considered a line specific when all roots show at least some cell switching (see Methods). Previous integrase induction by β-estradiol was detectable around 48 h, with more than 50% of seedlings fully switched by 72 h.20 In our experiments, we detected 100% switching by 48 h. The efficiency of switching in both tagged and untagged MED21 iEraser lines was similar, with little nonspecific switching found (Figure S2B). The rate of uninduced lines demonstrating leaky switching is consistent with our own observations that the β-estradiol inducible system (XVE, a transcriptional activator composed of a DNA-binding domain of LexA, the transcription activation domain of VP16, and the regulatory region of the human estrogen receptor)27 has a low but detectable transcriptional leakiness and highlights the importance of thorough screening of multiple independent lines. MED21:HA iEraser seedlings demonstrated increased root hair development (Figure 3B,C) and growth reductions following estradiol treatments compared with controls lacking β-estradiol (Figure 3D).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A chemically inducible MED21 eraser. (A) Schematic of the predicted behavior for the MED21 iEraser. The estradiol inducible integrase construct is composed of p35S:XVE (transcriptional activator composed of a DNA-binding domain of LexA, the transcription activation domain of VP16, and the regulatory region of the human estrogen receptor) and pLexA-minimal 35S driving expression of PhiC31. (B,C) Characterization of the iEraser by fluorescence microscopy shows induction as early as 48 h after treatment. The scale bar represents 50 μm (C). (D) Growth phenotypes were visible in estradiol-induced switched plants grown on 1 μM β-estradiol induction plates for 6 days. Seedlings were first grown for 6 days on LS media lacking β-estradiol before being transplanted to induction media (12 days total growth). (E) Protein expression analysis by Western blot for 12 independent iEraser lines. (F) Protein expression analysis by Western blot for roots and shoots isolated from plants grown with or without β-estradiol. Seedlings were grown on LS media for 6 days, and then transplanted to either control or induction media for another 6 days of growth. The experiment was performed in triplicate for each genotype. (G,H) Lengths of lateral (G) and primary (H) roots were quantified at 6 days from the indicated Integrase Eraser type. Seedlings were grown as in (F). Letters indicate significant difference (ANOVA and Tukey HSD multiple comparison test; p < 0.001).

We characterized the expression of MED21 in 12 independent iEraser lines, using the HA epitope tag. All lines had detectable protein expression (Figure 3E), so we focused further characterization of the MED21 iEraser on the progeny of one of these lines. Loss of MED21:HA could be detected in root and shoot tissues isolated from iEraser seedlings exposed to β-estradiol for 6 days, although a low level of protein was still visible on Western blots (Figure 3F). It is possible that the UBQ10 promoter drives high MED21:HA protein levels and therefore longer MED21:HA turnover times, and this could be tuned down by the addition of RNA destabilization tags to achieve lower abundances.20 This raises the possibility that β-estradiol may not be reaching a subset of cells, as has been seen for certain cell types like meristematic tissues.28,29 To test this hypothesis, we took advantage of the irreversible nature of the integrase-mediated switch. We reasoned that if all cells were switched in a parent plant, then the cells of the subsequent gametophyte and germ cells would also be switched, leading to a fully switched seedling in the next generation. Instead, we observed no switching in the progeny of seedlings exposed to β-estradiol (Figure S1D), indicating that at least a subset of meristematic cells must escape the induction of PhiC31.

Significant growth reduction in both primary and lateral roots could be measured in MED21 iEraser seedlings treated with β-estradiol (Figure 3D). This phenotype is consistent with the predicted impact of the loss of this essential gene. As expected, we found that -estradiol::PhiC31 phenocopied the reductions in lateral root length (Figure 3G) observed in pGATA23::PhiC31. Consistent with the difference in expected expression patterns of each promoter, pGATA23 Eraser lines had a similar primary root length to wild type, while primary root length in iEraser plants was sharply reduced (Figure 3H).

To extend the Integrase Eraser platform, we engineered a new technology that we termed Swap, which uses integrase-based recombination to switch between sequence variants (isoforms) of the same gene. We built a prototype of Swap that enabled a switch from the expression of wild-type MED21 to the expression of a mutant form of MED21 (mMED21) selectively in lateral roots (Figure 4A, Plasmid Maps pNL4174–4177). We employed a golden gate assembly approach to build our isoform target constructs, reminiscent of what we used to build our original constructs in Figure 1. The Swap target has a constitutive promoter (pUBQ10) flanked by integrase sites, positioned between the MED21 variants: wild-type MED21 marked with mTurquoise and a mutant form of MED21 marked with mScarlet. To avoid altering protein function through direct fusions, we instead introduced a P2A sequence between the MED21 and reporter sequences (Figure 4B). The P2A peptide induces ribosomal skipping,30 resulting in untagged versions of both MED21 variants and reporters.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Engineering and rapid prototyping of the “hot-swap” isoform switch approach. (A) Schematic of the predicted behavior for the MED21 Swap. Lateral root primordia will switch the expression of the rescue construct from wild-type (blue) to mutant isoform (red). (B) Design of the integrase target. The target is composed of two integrase sites (triangles) surrounding a constitutive promoter (pUBQ10), and each MED21 isoform is fused to the P2A self-cleaving peptide sequence and a fluorescent reporter (mTurquoise or mScarlet). In the basal state, MED21 and mTurquoise are produced. Once the PhiC31 integrase is expressed, it mediates inversion of the DNA between the integrase sites, inverting the promoter and leading to production of mMED21 and mScarlet. (C) Alignment of the AtMED21 N-terminal mutants. (D–G) Epifluorescence microscopy analysis of wild-type and mMED21 swap lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis primary transformants. Microscopy images were taken on a 20x objective, and the scale bar represents 50 μm. (H) Lateral root density (LRD per mm) and (I) lengths of lateral roots (Lateral root length in mm) from primary transformant lines were quantified at 14 days post germination from the indicated Integrase Swap type. At least 15 independent primary transformant lines were tested for each swap type. Lines were transplanted to soil and PCR genotyped for the med21 genotype. In (H), the LRD data points from med21 homozygous plants are colored in blue, while heterozygotes are colored dark gray, and ungenotyped samples are colored light gray. Letters indicate significant difference (ANOVA and Tukey HSD multiple comparison test; p < 0.001). In (I), data are presented as violin plots with nested boxplots to demonstrate that medians and interquartile ranges are comparable across conditions.

We selected mutant alleles of MED21 that are known to disrupt its binding with TPL (Figure 4C). Previous work in our lab has shown that deletions in the first seven amino acids of MED21 compromise TPL-binding activity and interfere with TPL-based repression.10 Ectopic expression of any of these mutant med21 isoforms in xylem pole pericycle cells competes with wild-type MED21, resulting in increased lateral root density.10 Here, we created four Swaps, in which each wild-type MED21 is switched to a different med21 mutant (Δ3MED21, Δ5MED21, Δ7MED21), in addition to the control, which has a wild-type allele on either side of the switch (Figure 4C). We performed rapid prototyping in Nicotiana benthamiana and found that switching of all Swap targets depended on the addition of the integrase (Figure S3A). Once exposed to integrase, Swap targets successfully switched, as indicated by expression of mScarlet.

We introduced the MED21 isoform switch targets into med211/MED21, pGATA23::PhiC31 plants and performed fluorescence microscopy to identify primary transformant lines (T1) with specific switching to mScarlet in only the lateral roots (Figures 4EG and S3BE). We hypothesized that plants with mMED21 isoform switches should lead to increased lateral root density, as was observed previously (Leydon et al.,10). Additionally, the mMED21 isoforms should retain their activation activity in the Mediator complex, leading to more normal lateral root lengths compared to the short lateral root phenotype observed in the MED21 Eraser experiments (Figures 2 and 3). Therefore, we quantified lateral root density in primary transformant mMED21 isoform switch lines (lateral root density, Figure 4H). We observed that at mMED21 N-terminal mutation lines demonstrated higher lateral root density (Figure 4F) and that these lateral roots were similar in length to the wild type (Figure 4I).

CONCLUSIONS

Essential genes are estimated to comprise approximately 20% of the genome,31 and further techniques to study, modify, and engineer these genes are needed to better understand and model their functions. Integrases are a promising tool, especially when compared to artificial microRNAs32 or CRISPR/Cas9-based tissue-specific knock out (TSKO),33 which suffer from low efficiency. In addition, integrase-driven recombination events are highly precise and less likely to produce the heterogeneity and diversity of repair-based mutations that result from Cas-based cleavage. While the tyrosine integrases such as Cre recombinase have been used more extensively in Arabidopsis and other plants to perform lineage tracing,34,35 implement logic circuits36 and study an essential gene HAP2/GCS1,37 there are several advantages that make serine integrases attractive. One clear advantage is that serine integrases bind to two distinct DNA-binding sites, making their modification of DNA irreversible. This is contrary to tyrosine integrases, such as FLP and Cre, which act on two identical sites and are able to catalyze both a forward and reverse reaction.38 Another limitation of tyrosine integrase application in plants has been the observation of low efficiency activity due to CHH context methylation of the tyrosine recombinase sites.39

The current major drawback to the Integrase Eraser approach is the requirement for a heterozygote mutation in the gene of interest; however, large numbers of mutants from gametophyte40 and embryo-lethal19 studies are ripe for reanalysis with such techniques. Another engineering constraint is that the high efficiency of integrase activity can lead to “overswitching” where recombination occurs in cells expressing only a background level of promoter expression. This potential challenge can be addressed by screening multiple lines, as is standard protocol for characterizing transgenic lines, and by using the integrase tuning toolkit described previously20 to attach protein degrons to the integrase, or RNA destabilization tags (DSTs) to its transcript. As a new suite of publicly available tools that directly address the obstacles of pleiotropy and essentiality, Integrase Erasers should enable researchers to gain experimental access to whole new swaths of the genome that have stood just out of reach.

METHODS

Cloning.

Our cloning strategy was based on Golden Gate assembly using appropriate spacers and BsaI-HFv2 (NEB) as the restriction enzyme. The Arabidopsis MED21:HA sequence was amplified by PCR with appropriate Golden Gate restriction sites and the construction of integrase targets was performed by Golden Gate reaction in the modified pGreenII-Hygr vector containing compatible Golden Gate sites defined in Guiziou et al.20 Plasmids used for construction of the novel targets are available at Addgene: 5 prime side mScarlet cassette - L0-T4 tRBSC_mScarlet (Addgene #195887), Integrase site flanked pUBQ10 - L0-T1 Target PhiC31–(Addgene #195890). Control target DNA - T1P/pUBQ10(mTurq→mScarlet) - (Addgene #195945). Each target was constructed into the Plant MoClo backbone vector pICH86966 (Addgene #48075), see Plasmid Maps below. pGATA23 driven PhiC31—L1_GATA23_1—(Addgene #195913) and estradiol inducible promoter: p35S_XVE-PhiC31-tUBQ1–(Addgene # 195932) were made previously. Enzymes for Golden Gate assembly were purchased from New England Biolabs (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA). PCR was performed using 2X Q5 PCR master mix (NEB) and GoTaq master mix for colony PCR (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Primers were purchased from IDT (Louvain, Belgium).Sequences were verified with Sanger sequencing by Azenta Life Sciences (Seattle, USA). Chemically competent cultures of the E. coli strain DH5alphaZ1 (laciq, PN25-tetR, SpR, deoR, supE44, Delta(lacZYA-argFV169), Phi80 lacZDeltaM15, hsdR17(rK−, mK+), recA1, endA1, gyrA96, thi-1, relA1) were transformed with plasmid constructs containing kanamycin resistance. Transformed E. coli was grown in LB media (LB broth, Miller) with kanamycin (Millipore Sigma, 50 μg/mL).

Western Blot.

Protein was collected into 1.5 mL tubes with one steel bead per tube (MN Beads Type D–3 mm steel beads, Machery-Nagel), snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and homogenized on max settings on a tissue homogenizer (MM400, Retsch). Homogenized tissue was resuspended in 2x sample buffer, boiled for 10 min, and spun down before being run on handmade 10% acrylamide SDS-PAGE gels and Western blotted with anti-HA-HRP antibodies from Roche/Millipore Sigma (RRID:AB_390917, REF-12013819001, Clone 3F10), or anti-Actin antibody (Abcam, ab197345). In all experiments, an equivalent mass of protein samples was used for extraction for the compared sample types, i.e., root and shoots.

Plant Growth.

Arabidopsis seedlings were sown in 0.5× Linsmaier and Skoog nutrient medium (LS) (Caisson Laboratories) and 0.8% w/v agar, stratified at 4 °C for 2 days, and grown in constant light at 22 °C. Phyto agar (PlantMedia/bioWORLD) was used when imaging seedlings, and Bacto agar (ThermoFisher) was otherwise. For Arabidopsis thaliana experiments T2 plant lines harboring T-DNAs for MED21 (med211, WiscDsLox461–464 K13) were grown on media supplemented with 25 μg/mL Glufosinate-ammonium (Oakwood Chemical, SC).

Construction and Selection of Transgenic Arabidopsis Lines.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 was transformed by electroporation and subsequently grown in LB media with rifampin (Millipore Sigma, 50 μg/mL), gentamicin (Millipore Sigma, 50 μg/mL), any antibiotics carried on the specific plasmid(s), most often kanamycin (Millipore Sigma, 50 μg/mL). The floral dip method41 was used to generate integrase target lines in Col-0, and then used to introduce each integrase construct into these established target lines. For T1 selection: 120 mg of T1 seeds (~2000 seeds) were sterilized using 70% ethanol and 0.05% Triton-X-100 and then washed using 95% ethanol. Seeds were resuspended in 0.1% agarose and spread onto 0.5X LS selection plates using 25 μg/mL kanamycin for target lines and 25 μg/mL kanamycin and 25 μg/mL hygromycin for lines with both the integrase and the target. The plates were stratified at 4 °C for 48 h, then light pulsed for 6 h, and covered for 48 h. They were then grown for 4–5 days. To select transformants, tall seedlings with long roots and a vibrant green color were picked from the selection plate with sterilized tweezers and transferred to a new 0.5X LS Phyto agar plate for characterization.

Imaging of Reporter and Integrase Lines.

T1 seedlings for each line were grown 4–5 days after transformant selection. Each selected seedling was imaged at 20× magnification using an epifluorescence microscope (Leica Biosystems, model: DMI 3000) using the RFP (exposure 700 ms, gain 2) and CFP (exposure 700 ms, gain 2) channels. Selected T1 seedlings were then transferred to soil, and at maturation, T2 seeds were selected. For later generations, seedlings were sterilized similarly to T1s, stratified, plated on an LS agar plate, grown for 4–5 days, and characterized using the epifluorescence microscope as for T1. Confocal Imaging of the Eraser seedlings were performed using Nikon A1R HD25 laser scanning confocal microscope with 561 laser and 578–623 detector for RFP imaging. For the reporter lines, seedlings were scanned to find early developed lateral roots. Imaging was processed using FIJI.42 For each imaging, a Z-stack was recorded, and a maximum average of the Z-stack in the RFP channel was generated.

Root Growth Phenotyping.

6–8 T2 seedlings from five selected A. thaliana lines were grown on antibiotic LS Phyto plates for 14 days. Each plate was scanned on days 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of growth by using a flatbed scanner (Epson America, Long Beach, CA). Using FIJI, every lateral and primary root was measured in units of millimeters, and every individual lateral root was counted. Then for each of the selected seedlings, we divided the number of lateral roots on the primary root by the root length. The data was graphed through the use of R studio software. Fluorescence microscopy was used to identify and quantify the number of emerging lateral roots for every seedling.

For estradiol induction in T2s, antibiotic selection was performed as described in the section about A. thaliana transgenic lines. Four days after transplanting Kanamycin, Hygromycin resistant seedlings onto 0.5X LS Phyto plates, the seedlings were imaged via microscopy in RFP channels with identical settings as described in the method section about integrase switch seedling characterization. Then the seedlings were transferred onto new 0.5X LS Phyto plates with 10 μM β-estradiol. Each seedling was imaged 24, 48, and 72 h after transfer by both epifluorescence (for switching phenotype) and on a flatbed scanner as described above (for root growth phenotyping). A seedling was considered to exhibit a switch when any nuclear RFP was detected in the root tip region (manual scanning at least 10 mm up each individual root tip). No distinction was made as to the proportion of cells switched, and unswitched seedlings were required to show no evidence of nuclear RFP.

RNA Analysis.

Seedlings for RNA analysis were grown for 14 days before collection of entire roots or microdissected lateral roots that were homogenized by bead beating. The RNA was extracted from these tissues using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), including an on-column DNA digestion procedure RNase-Free DNase Set (Cat. No. 79254, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was obtained with iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA). We analyzed expression levels of the gene of interest with qPCR. The qPCR reaction was carried out on 2 μL of 1/5-diluted cDNA using 2X SYBR Super Mix (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA) with locus-specific primers. We used the reference gene to normalize expression in transgenic Arabidopsis for SERINE/THREONINE PROTEIN PHOSPHOTASE 2A (PP2A). The qPCR primers were as follows: PP2A (F GCGGTTGTGGAGAACATGATACG, R GAACCAAACACAATTCGTTGCTG), mScarlet (F ACCTTGAACCGCATGAACTC, R AGAGGAAAGTCGGAAGTGGTAG), MED21:HA (F ACAAGCTGCTGACAATTGCC, R AGCAGCTCTAGTGGCGTAATC). All primers were optimized for >90% linear efficiency.

Protein Alignments.

The MED21 protein sequence was aligned to homologues using CLC Sequence Viewer 7 (QIAGEN, Aarhus, Denmark), a tree was constructed using a neighbor-joining method, and bootstrap analysis performed with 10,000 replicates.

Quantification and Statistical Analysis.

All quantification and statistical analyses were performed in R (4.4.2), and the corresponding code has been deposited into GitHub: https://github.com/achillobator/Hot-Swappable_Genetic_Switch

Plasmid Maps.

pNL3779_L2_mScarlet-pUBQ10-MED21-HA — https://benchling.com/s/seq-Db4peeJ0ujTdVFozrQrZ?m=slm-V2AY2UyqGBWm9GCGQFgp

pNL3857_L2_mScarlet-pUBQ10-MED21—https://benchling.com/s/seq-2733YDOGQuioeAFeeMtF?m=slm-vZcALggBA2HcJQ27XG0m

pNL4174_L2_ mScarlet—P2A-MED21-pUBQ10-MED21-P2A-mTurq — https://benchling.com/s/seq-GUNlRpAHMR84NYfQsDux?m=slm-PGEFPSnUIDR0XS4CEpD3

pNL4175_L2_ mScarlet—P2A-del3MED21-pUBQ10-MED21-P2A-mTurq—https://benchling.com/s/seq-ZBgrtLvyusbezOjT5XJc?m=slm-Em28XAtBr4AWN9bXCajj

pNL4176_L2_ mScarlet—P2A-del5MED21-pUBQ10-MED21-P2A-mTurq—https://benchling.com/s/seq-RJrmwYXp8ZWQ1pxBfLv2?m=slm-AQekxodEH0LI71MDA1Z5

pNL4177_L2_ mScarlet—P2A-del7MED21-pUBQ10-MED21-P2A-mTurq—https://benchling.com/s/seq-lB7kvjDcc7z8euYfNX1N?m=slm-usEImXgg6j4Gl00Sag89

Supplementary Material

Sup1
Sup2
Sup3
Download video file (21MB, avi)

ASSOCIATED CONTENT

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssynbio.5c00085.

Confirmation that the pUBQ10 promoter behaves unidirectionally in Arabidopsis (Supplemental Figure 1); characterization of independent MED21 iEraser lines, quantification of microscopy analysis (Supplemental Figure 2); characterization of swap targets in plants, in microscopy of rapid prototyping in Nicotiana benthamiana, and in Arabidopsis thaliana primary transformants (Supplemental Figure 3) (PDF)

S5. Supplemental DNA Sequences. Plasmid maps of all PhiC31 target constructs in FASTA and Genbank format (ZIP)

S4. Supplemental Movie 1. Time-lapse imaging of MED21 Eraser root growth phenotype (AVI)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank current and former members of the Nemhauser group, including Dr. Sarah Guiziou, Janet Solano Sanchez, Benjamin Downing for constructive discussions. We thank Dr. Takato Imaizumi, Dr. Adam Steinbrenner, and Dr. Veronica Di Stillio for insightful suggestions. This work was supported by the NIH (R01-GM107084 and R35-GM148135–01 to JLN) and a Faculty Scholar Award from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (to J.N.L.), A.R.L. was supported as a Simons Foundation Fellow of the Life Sciences Research Foundation.

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Contributor Information

Isabella J. Watson, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1800, United States

Cassandra Maranas, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1800, United States.

Jennifer L. Nemhauser, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1800, United States

Alexander R Leydon, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1800, United States.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Cohen O; Oberhardt M; Yizhak K; Ruppin E Essential Genes Embody Increased Mutational Robustness to Compensate for the Lack of Backup Genetic Redundancy. PloS One 2016, 11 (12), No. e0168444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).He X; Zhang J Why Do Hubs Tend to Be Essential in Protein Networks? PLoS Genet. 2006, 2 (6), No. e88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Rancati G; Moffat J; Typas A; Pavelka N Emerging and Evolving Concepts in Gene Essentiality. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2018, 19 (1), 34–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Chen J; Yang S; Fan B; Zhu C; Chen Z The Mediator Complex: A Central Coordinator of Plant Adaptive Responses to Environmental Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23 (11), 6170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Dolan WL; Chapple C Conservation and Divergence of Mediator Structure and Function: Insights from Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2017, 58 (1), 4–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Maji S; Dahiya P; Waseem M; Dwivedi N; Bhat DS; Dar TH; Thakur JK Interaction Map of Arabidopsis Mediator Complex Expounding Its Topology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47 (8), 3904–3920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Malik N; Agarwal P; Tyagi A Emerging Functions of Multi-Protein Complex Mediator with Special Emphasis on Plants. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 52 (5), 475–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Jaskolowski A; Iñigo S; Arellano SM; Arias LA; Fiol DF; Sede AR; Oldra MB; Lorenzi H; Muschietti JP; Pagnussat GC; Cerdán PD. The MED30 Subunit of Mediator Complex Is Essential for Early Plant Development and Promotes Flowering in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Dev. Camb. Engl. 2019, 146 (10), dev175224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Zhang L; Guo C The Important Function of Mediator Complex in Controlling the Developmental Transitions in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21 (8), 2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Leydon AR; Wang W; Gala HP; Gilmour S; Juarez-solis S; Zahler ML; Zemke JE; Zheng N; Nemhauser JL Repression by the Arabidopsis TOPLESS Corepressor Requires Association with the Core Mediator Complex. eLife 2021, 10, No. e66739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Leydon AR; Downing B; Sanchez JS; Loll-krippleber R; Belliveau NM; Rodriguez-mias RA; Bauer A; Watson IJ; Bae L; Villén J; Brown GW; Nemhauser JL A Conserved Function of Corepressors Is to Nucleate Assembly of the Transcriptional Preinitiation Complex. bioRxiv April 1, 2024; p 2024.04.01.587599. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Dhawan R; Luo H; Foerster AM; Abuqamar S; Du H-N; Briggs SD; Mittelsten scheid O; Mengiste T HISTONE MONOUBIQUITINATION1 Interacts with a Subunit of the Mediator Complex and Regulates Defense against Necrotrophic Fungal Pathogens in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009, 21 (3), 1000–1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Li Z; Vizeacoumar FJ; Bahr S; Li J; Warringer J; Vizeacoumar FS; Min R; Vandersluis B; Bellay J; Devit M; Fleming JA; Stephens A; Haase J; Lin Z-Y; Baryshnikova A; Lu H; Yan Z; Jin K; Barker S; Datti A; Giaever G; Nislow C; Bulawa C; Myers CL; Costanzo M; Gingras A-C; Zhang Z; Blomberg A; Bloom K; Andrews B; Boone C Systematic Exploration of Essential Yeast Gene Function with Temperature-Sensitive Mutants. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29 (4), 361–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Haruki H; Nishikawa J; Laemmli UK The Anchor-Away Technique: Rapid, Conditional Establishment of Yeast Mutant Phenotypes. Mol. Cell 2008, 31 (6), 925–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Gosink MM; Vierstra RD Redirecting the Specificity of Ubiquitination by Modifying Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995, 92 (20), 9117–9121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Hoeberichts FA; Vaeck E; Kiddle G; Coppens E; Van de cotte B; Adamantidis A; Ormenese S; Foyer CH; Zabeau M; Inzé D; Périlleux C; Van breusegem F; Vuylsteke M A Temperature-Sensitive Mutation in the Arabidopsis Thaliana Phosphomannomutase Gene Disrupts Protein Glycosylation and Triggers Cell Death*. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283 (9), 5708–5718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Vidali L; Augustine RC; Fay SN; Franco P; Pattavina KA; Bezanilla M Rapid Screening for Temperature-Sensitive Alleles in Plants. Plant Physiol. 2009, 151 (2), 506–514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Winkler J; Mylle E; De meyer A; Pavie B; Merchie J; Grones P; Van damme DL Visualizing Protein-Protein Interactions in Plants by Rapamycin-Dependent Delocalization. Plant Cell 2021, 33 (4), 1101–1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Meinke D; Muralla R; Sweeney C; Dickerman A Identifying Essential Genes in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13 (9), 483–491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Guiziou S; Maranas CJ; Chu JC; Nemhauser JL An Integrase Toolbox to Record Gene-Expression during Plant Development. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14 (1), 1844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Banda J; Bellande K; von Wangenheim D; Goh T; Guyomarc’h S; Laplaze L; Bennett MJ Lateral Root Formation in Arabidopsis: A Well-Ordered LRexit. Trends Plant Sci. 2019, 24 (9), 826–839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Maranas CJ; George W; Scallon SK; Vangilder S; Nemhauser JL; Guiziou S A History-Dependent Integrase Recorder of Plant Gene Expression with Single Cell Resolution. bioRxiv June 4, 2024; p 2024.06.04.597320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).De rybel B; Vassileva V; Parizot B; Demeulenaere M; Grunewald W; Audenaert D; Van campenhout J; Overvoorde P; Jansen L; Vanneste S; Möller B; Wilson M; Holman T; Van isterdael G; Brunoud G; Vuylsteke M; Vernoux T; De veylder L; Inzé D; Weijers D; Bennett MJ; Beeckman T A Novel Aux/IAA28 Signaling Cascade Activates GATA23-Dependent Specification of Lateral Root Founder Cell Identity. Curr. Biol. CB 2010, 20 (19), 1697–1706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Silver BD; Willett CG; Maher KA; Wang D; Deal RB Differences in Transcription Initiation Directionality Underlie Distinctions between Plants and Animals in Chromatin Modification Patterns at Genes and Cis-Regulatory Elements. G3 Bethesda Md 2024, 14 (3), jkae016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Yu Z; Zhang F; Friml J; Ding Z Auxin Signaling: Research Advances over the Past 30 Years. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2022, 64 (2), 371–392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Calderon-villalobos LI; Tan X; Zheng N; Estelle M Auxin Perception—Structural Insights. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2 (7), No. a005546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Zuo J; Niu QW; Chua NH Technical Advance: An Estrogen Receptor-Based Transactivator XVE Mediates Highly Inducible Gene Expression in Transgenic Plants. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000, 24 (2), 265–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Hu Y; Omary M; Hu Y; Doron O; Hoermayer L; Chen Q; Megides O; Chekli O; Ding Z; Friml J; Zhao Y; Tsarfaty I; Shani E Cell Kinetics of Auxin Transport and Activity in Arabidopsis Root Growth and Skewing. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Borghi L; Gutzat R; Fütterer J; Laizet Y; Hennig L; Gruissem W. Arabidopsis RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED Is Required for Stem Cell Maintenance, Cell Differentiation, and Lateral Organ Production. Plant Cell 2010, 22 (6), 1792–1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).De lima JGS; Lanza DCF 2A and 2A-like Sequences: Distribution in Different Virus Species and Applications in Biotechnology. Viruses 2021, 13 (11), 2160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Lloyd JP; Seddon AE; Moghe GD; Simenc MC; Shiu S-H Characteristics of Plant Essential Genes Allow for Within- and between-Species Prediction of Lethal Mutant Phenotypes. Plant Cell 2015, 27 (8), 2133–2147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Tiwari M; Sharma D; Trivedi PK Artificial microRNA Mediated Gene Silencing in Plants: Progress and Perspectives. Plant Mol. Biol. 2014, 86 (1–2), 1–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Decaestecker W; Buono RA; Pfeiffer ML; Vangheluwe N; Jourquin J; Karimi M; Van isterdael G; Beeckman T; Nowack MK; Jacobs TB CRISPR-TSKO: A Technique for Efficient Mutagenesis in Specific Cell Types, Tissues, or Organs in Arabidopsis[OPEN]. Plant Cell 2019, 31 (12), 2868–2887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Efroni I; Mello A; Nawy T; Ip P-L; Rahni R; Delrose N; Powers A; Satija R; Birnbaum KD Root Regeneration Triggers an Embryo-like Sequence Guided by Hormonal Interactions. Cell 2016, 165 (7), 1721–1733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Wachsman G; Heidstra R; Scheres B Distinct Cell-Autonomous Functions of RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED in Arabidopsis Stem Cells Revealed by the Brother of Brainbow Clonal Analysis System. Plant Cell 2011, 23 (7), 2581–2591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Lloyd JPB; Ly F; Gong P; Pflueger J; Swain T; Pflueger C; Fourie E; Khan MA; Kidd BN; Lister R Synthetic Memory Circuits for Stable Cell Reprogramming in Plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 2022, 40 (12), 1862–1872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Nagahara S; Takeuchi H; Higashiyama T Generation of a Homozygous Fertilization-Defective Gcs1Mutant by Heat-Inducible Removal of a Rescue Gene. Plant Reprod. 2015, 28 (1), 33–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Olorunniji FJ; Rosser SJ; Stark WM Site-Specific Recombinases: Molecular Machines for the Genetic Revolution. Biochem. J. 2016, 473 (6), 673–684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Liu R; Long Q; Zou X; Wang Y; Pei Y DNA Methylation Occurring in Cre-Expressing Cells Inhibits loxP Recombination and Silences loxP-Sandwiched Genes. New Phytol. 2021, 231 (1), 210–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Johnson MA; Von besser K; Zhou Q; Smith E; Aux G; Patton D; Levin JZ; Preuss D Arabidopsis Hapless Mutations Define Essential Gametophytic Functions. Genetics 2004, 168 (2), 971–982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Clough SJ; Bent AF Floral Dip: A Simplified Method for Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Arabidopsis Thaliana. Plant J. 1998, 16 (6), 735–743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Schindelin J; Arganda-carreras I; Frise E; Kaynig V; Longair M; Pietzsch T; Preibisch S; Rueden C; Saalfeld S; Schmid B; Tinevez J-Y; White DJ; Hartenstein V; Eliceiri K; Tomancak P; Cardona A Fiji: An Open-Source Platform for Biological-Image Analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9 (7), 676–682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Sup1
Sup2
Sup3
Download video file (21MB, avi)

RESOURCES