Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ther. 2025 Mar 10;56(4):680–688. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2025.02.005

Table 3.

Predictors of Ratings for ChatGPT-Generated Hierarchies

Appropriateness Specificity Variability Safety Overall Usefulness
OCD Sub-Type F(2,69) = .73,
p = .49		 F(2,69) = 2.52,
p = .09		 F(2,69) = .54,
p = .59		 F(2,69) = 1.29,
p = .28		 F(2,69) = 1.26,
p = .29
Symptom Number F(2,69) = .33,
p = .72		 F(2,69) = 1.71,
p = .19		 F(2,69) = .09,
p = .92		 F(2,69) = .41,
p = .66		 F(2,69) = .03,
p = .97
Symptom Detail F(1,70) = 6.92,
p = .01 		F(1,70) = 11.51,
p = .001 		F(1,70) = 8.31,
p = .005 		F(1,70) = 2.16,
p = .15		 F(1,70) = 6.93,
p = .01
Age F(1,70) = 1.05,
p = .31		 F(1,70) = .13,
p = .72		 F(1,70) = .72,
p = .40		 F(1,70) = .65,
p= .42		 F(1,70) = .18,
p = .67
Gender F(1,70) = 1.36,
p = .25		 F(1,70) = .02,
p = .90		 F(1,70) = .72,
p = .40		 F(1,70) = .03,
p = .87		 F(1,70) = 2.86,
p = .10