Skip to main content
. 2005 Dec;187(23):8127–8136. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.23.8127-8136.2005

TABLE 4.

Change in transcript levels of genes in B. subtilis in response to TPP

Genea thi Box elemente Enzyme/functiona Ratiob
WT/WT+c Dereg+/WT+d
thiC + Biosynthesis of hydroxymethylpyrimidine phosphate 58 105
ywbI Similar to LysR family of transcriptional regulators NC NC
thiM Hydroxyethylthiazole kinase NC NC
thiE Thiamine phosphate synthase NC NC
tenA + Thiaminasef 68 62
tenI + Possible antagonist of TenA 25 27
thiO (goxB) + Glycine oxidase 67 56
thiS (yjbS) + Sulfur carrier protein 87 86
thiG (yjbT) + Thiazole synthase 82 61
thiF (yjbU) + ThiS adenylyltransferase 87 96
thiD (yjbV) + Phosphomethylpyrimidine kinase 27 34
pdxK (thiD) Pyridoxal/pyridoxal/pyridoxamine kinase NC NC
thiL (ydiA) TMP kinase NC NC
thiN (yloS) Thiamine pyrophosphorylase NC NC
ytbJ Possible thiI orthologs (sulfur transferase) NC NC
dxs (yqiE) 1-Deoxy-d-xylulose synthase NC NC
ykoC + Possible transmembrane component of thiamine-related ABC transporter 10 15
ykoD + Possible ATPase component of thiamine-related ABC transporter 11 16
ykoE + Possible transmembrane component of thiamine-related ABC transporter 22 32
ykoF + Possible ligand-binding protein of thiamine-related ABC transporter 17 23
yuaJ + Possible thiamine permease 6.6 8.4
ylmB + Similar to acetylornithine deacetylase 15 11
a

Gene names and functions were described by Perkins and Pero (27) and in SubtiList (http://genolist.pasteur.fr/SubtiList).

b

Transcript ratios were calculated by dividing the average difference values (after normalization) from hybridization experiments of wild-type cells grown to exponential phase in MM without TPP treatment by those with TPP treatment (WT/WT+) or from hybridization experiments of deregulated mutant cells grown to exponential phase in MM with TPP treatment by those of wild-type cells grown under the same condition (Dereg+/WT+). For some genes (in bold), average difference values were obtained from duplicate probe sets per hybridization experiment: NC, no change in average difference values. Some data were taken from Table 1 in a report by Lee et al. (16).

c

r value of 0.95 (TPP-treated versus untreated data sets).

d

r value of 0.85 (TPP-treated TH48 versus TPP-treated PY79 data sets).

e

Under thi box element control according to report by Rodionov et al. (29).

f

See reference 32.