Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 4;16:7305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-37872-6

Table 3.

Parameter estimates (± SE) and confidence intervals (CI; 95% and 85%) from the best supported linear mixed effect models explaining chick growth measurements (body mass (control/enlarged, n = 58/52 chicks), Tarsus (n = 56/50 chicks), bill (n = 56/50 chicks) and total head (n = 47/41 chicks) length) with candidate models including fixed effects of experimental group, chick age, habitat and laying date, and interactions between habitat and chick age, and between experimental group and chick age, and random effects of brood ID and chick ID.

Response 95% CI 85% CI
Model Estimate SE lower upper lower upper p
Mass (Intercept) 1.130 0.030 1.070 1.191 1.086 1.175 < 0.001
Group (enlarged) − 0.084 0.039 − 0.163 − 0.006 − 0.141 − 0.027 0.038
Habitat (marine) − 0.221 0.033 − 0.287 − 0.154 − 0.270 − 0.172 < 0.001
Age − 0.013 0.002 − 0.018 − 0.008 − 0.017 − 0.010 < 0.001
Habitat (marine) * Age 0.025 0.004 0.017 0.033 0.019 0.031 < 0.001
Tarsus (Intercept) 1.028 0.008 1.012 1.045 1.016 1.041 < 0.001
Group (enlarged) − 0.036 0.011 − 0.058 − 0.015 − 0.052 − 0.021 0.002
Habitat (marine) − 0.030 0.009 − 0.049 − 0.011 − 0.044 − 0.016 0.002
Age − 0.003 6.9e–04 − 0.004 − 0.002 − 0.004 − 0.002 < 0.001
Habitat (marine) * Age 0.005 0.001 0.003 0.008 0.004 0.007 < 0.001
Bill (Intercept) 0.960 0.034 0.892 1.029 0.910 1.010 < 0.001
Group (enlarged) 0.002 0.019 − 0.036 0.040 − 0.025 0.030 0.900
Habitat (marine) − 0.068 0.024 − 0.117 − 0.020 − 0.104 − 0.032 0.005
Age − 0.003 0.002 − 0.007 3.5e–04 − 0.006 − 0.001 0.075
Laying date 0.005 0.002 3.6e–04 0.009 0.002 0.008 0.036
Habitat (marine) * Age 0.007 0.003 3.8e–04 0.013 0.002 0.011 0.036
Head and bill (Intercept) 1.003 0.006 0.100 1.016 0.994 1.013 < 0.001
Group (enlarged) − 0.009 0.009 − 0.028 0.010 − 0.023 0.004 0.328