Table I.
Developmental Stage | MMC | 2N 2C | 3N 2C | 3N 3C | 4N 2C | 4N 3C | 4N 4C | (4–8)N (3–7)C |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | ||||||||
Class 1 (4)b | 15–46 | 54–64 | 0–9 | 0–4 | 0–5 | 0–5 | 0–3 | 0–4 |
Class 2 (6) | 2–3 | 85–100 | 0–3 | 0–4 | 2–14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | 0–3 |
Class 3 (3) | – | 48–62 | 2–9 | 0–8 | 2–42 | 3–17 | 2–13 | 3–4 |
Class 4 (5) | – | 8–36 | 3–10 | 5–12 | 0–6 | 2–32 | 24–70 | 3–6 |
MMC, Microspore mother cells, which had one to two nuclei; N, nuclear no. in meiotic products; C, cell no. in meiotic products.
Anthers were assigned to four classes based on their developmental stages, as judged by the distribution of microspore mother cells and meiotic products. Class 1 was the least advanced in development because it had the highest percentage of microspore mother cells (one cell, one–two nuclei). Class 2 was more advanced than class 1 because it had a higher percentage of dyads (two cells) and a lower percentage of microspore mother cells. Class 3 was more advanced than class 2 because it no longer had microspore mother cells and had more tetrads than class 2. Class 4 was the most advanced because it had the highest percentage of tetrads.
No. of anthers examined.