Table 3.
Relationship between HDL-C and MASLD risk in different sensitivity analyses.
| Exposure | Model 5 (OR, 95% CI, p) | Model 6 (OR, 95% CI, p) |
|---|---|---|
| HDL-C | 0.46 (0.35, 0.61) < 0.0001 | 0.44 (0.35, 0.55) < 0.0001 |
| HDL-C (quartile) | ||
| Q1 | ref | ref |
| Q2 | 0.92 (0.77, 1.10) 0.3828 | 0.90 (0.77, 1.04) 0.1500 |
| Q3 | 0.61 (0.49, 0.76) < 0.0001 | 0.62 (0.52, 0.75) < 0.0001 |
| Q4 | 0.48 (0.36, 0.64) < 0.0001 | 0.43 (0.34, 0.56) < 0.0001 |
| p for trend | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Model 5 was sensitivity analysis after excluding those with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. We adjusted age, ethanol consumption, smoking, physical activity, SBP, DBP, BMI, TC, TG, HbA1c, and FPG.
Model 6 was sensitivity analysis after excluding those with age ≥ 60 years. We adjusted age, ethanol consumption, smoking, physical activity, SBP, DBP, BMI, TC, TG, HbA1c, and FPG.
OR, Odds ratios; CI, Confidence interval; Ref, Reference.