Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 10;13:1751477. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1751477

Table 3.

Relationship between HDL-C and MASLD risk in different sensitivity analyses.

Exposure Model 5 (OR, 95% CI, p) Model 6 (OR, 95% CI, p)
HDL-C 0.46 (0.35, 0.61) < 0.0001 0.44 (0.35, 0.55) < 0.0001
HDL-C (quartile)
Q1 ref ref
Q2 0.92 (0.77, 1.10) 0.3828 0.90 (0.77, 1.04) 0.1500
Q3 0.61 (0.49, 0.76) < 0.0001 0.62 (0.52, 0.75) < 0.0001
Q4 0.48 (0.36, 0.64) < 0.0001 0.43 (0.34, 0.56) < 0.0001
p for trend <0.0001 <0.0001

Model 5 was sensitivity analysis after excluding those with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. We adjusted age, ethanol consumption, smoking, physical activity, SBP, DBP, BMI, TC, TG, HbA1c, and FPG.

Model 6 was sensitivity analysis after excluding those with age ≥ 60 years. We adjusted age, ethanol consumption, smoking, physical activity, SBP, DBP, BMI, TC, TG, HbA1c, and FPG.

OR, Odds ratios; CI, Confidence interval; Ref, Reference.