Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 2;26:139. doi: 10.1186/s12871-026-03618-0

Table 4.

Comparison between the two studied groups according to Boezaat surgical filed grading

Boezaat surgical filed grading Group TN(n = 30) p0 Group PC(n = 30) p0 U p
Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
15 min. 3 (3 – 4) 3 (3 – 4) 450.0 1.000
30 min. 2 (2 – 3) <0.001* 2 (2 – 3) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
45 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
60 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
75 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
90 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
105 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
120 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
135 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 450.0 1.000
150 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 420.0 1.000
165 min. 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 2 (2 – 2) <0.001* 420.0 1.000
180 min. 2 (2 – 2) 0.001* 2 (2 – 2) 0.001* 91.00 1.000

IQR Inter quartile range, U Mann Whitney test, p0 p value for Friedman test for comparing between 15 min. and each period, p p value for comparing between the two studied groups

*: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05