Abstract
Objective
Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can automatically quantify parenchymal abnormalities on chest CT imaging using deep learning. We leveraged QCT to detect pulmonary abnormalities in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared to healthy controls.
Methods
We analyzed high-resolution CT chest imaging from participants with early RA in the prospective, multicenter, SAIL-RA study and healthy non-smoking controls from the COPDGene study. A deep learning classifier quantified the percentage of normal lung, interstitial abnormalities, and emphysema for each participant. We compared the percentage of QCT features between early RA participants and healthy comparators and examined associations using multivariable linear regression.
Results
We analyzed 200 participants with early RA (median RA duration 8.3 months, mean age 55.7 years, 74.5% female) and 104 healthy controls (mean age 62.0 years, 68.3% female). The median percentage of interstitial abnormalities on QCT was 3.7% (IQR 2.1, 6.1%) for early RA and 1.6% (IQR 0.8, 2.4%) for healthy controls (p<0.0001). Early RA was associated with 9.3% less normal lung on QCT than healthy controls, adjusted for age and sex (p<0.0001). Among RA participants, QCT interstitial abnormalities were associated with older age (multivariable β=0.1 per year, 95%CI 0.07-0.2, p<0.0001) and higher DAS28-ESR (multivariable β=0.6 per unit, 95%CI 0.01-1.3, p=0.046).
Conclusion
Participants with early RA had less normal lung and more interstitial abnormalities on a deep learning-derived QCT measure than healthy controls. These results suggest that loss of normal lung is already present in early RA and emphasizes the urgent need for strategies to preserve lung health in RA.
INTRODUCTION
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a spectrum of interstitial lung disease (ILD) severity that ranges from subclinical abnormalities to clinically apparent lung disease that contributes to significant morbidity and mortality1–5. Detection and monitoring of RA-ILD typically relies on visual interpretation of high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) chest imaging, which requires significant expertise and can be insensitive to subtle abnormalities and changes over time6. Several quantitative CT (QCT) techniques have been developed to automatically quantify abnormal lung features using machine learning7. However, there has been limited application of these techniques to RA-ILD.
The early RA period represents an important opportunity to identify and quantify lung abnormalities and identify risk factors for the presence and progression of RA-ILD. Several epidemiological studies have detailed that RA-ILD can occur early in the RA disease course or prior to the development of articular symptoms8. Since only a subset of patients with subclinical disease will progress to clinically apparent RA-ILD, there is significant uncertainty about optimal monitoring and treatment strategies during this period. QCT techniques have been deployed in multiple research settings and have demonstrated strong associations with respiratory symptoms and all-cause mortality in population-based studies9,10. Additionally, QCT techniques have been used to monitor changes in interstitial abnormalities10 and may be an attractive approach for monitoring progression as well as the effect of immunosuppressive and antifibrotic therapies in patients with RA-ILD.
We used data from a multicenter, prospective cohort study of patients with early RA as well as a study that included healthy controls to investigate the association of QCT findings with RA and demographic, lifestyle, and RA clinical factors. All participants were assessed with HRCT chest imaging that was processed using a deep learning QCT classifier. We hypothesized that early RA would be associated with increased quantitative interstitial abnormalities compared to healthy controls and that higher RA disease activity would be associated with increased interstitial abnormalities among those with early RA.
METHODS
Early RA participants
We analyzed baseline data of the longitudinal prospective Study of Inflammatory Arthritis and Interstitial Lung Disease in Early RA (SAIL-RA). All participants were diagnosed with early RA, defined as within two years of study enrollment and met 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA11. Study participants were recruited at five United States (US) academic healthcare centers between 2017 and 2024: Brigham and Women’s Hospital (Boston, MA), Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA), University of Colorado (Aurora, CO), University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, MI), and University of Nebraska Medical Center (Omaha, NE). The SAIL-RA study was approved by the Mass General Brigham (#2020P003768) and University of Nebraska Medical Center (#0282-16-FB) Institutional Review Boards.
Healthy controls
Healthy, never-smoker controls were recruited through the COPDGene study, a multicenter, prospective, cohort study that recruited a group of healthy never smoker comparators in addition to a larger group of current and former smokers12,13. COPDGene participants were recruited at 21 clinical centers in the US between 2007 and 2011. Participants completed baseline health questionnaires at enrollment that included self-reported physician diagnosis of RA and current medication use. For this analysis, we defined healthy controls as any of the healthy, never-smokers who did not self-report a history of RA or use of a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) medication.
This COPDGene substudy was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (protocol #2020P000558). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants across both studies.
Study measures
As previously reported14, all SAIL-RA participants were assessed with surveys, history, physical examination, HRCT chest imaging, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and laboratory testing at the baseline study visit. Survey data included demographics, smoking status (never, past, or current smoker), and pack-years of cigarette smoking. HRCT scans were performed on multidetector CT scanners (at least 16 detectors) with inspiratory, supine volumetric images and image reconstruction using 1 to 1.25mm slice thickness. PFTs included forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Laboratory testing for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was performed on peripheral blood collected during the study visit. Data on rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide were obtained from review of clinically performed laboratory tests. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight measured as part of the study visit physical examination. Tender and swollen joint assessments were performed by trained rheumatologists at all sites.
For each participant, current medications and RA diagnosis date were obtained from review of electronic health records. Disease Activity Score with 28 joints and ESR (DAS28-ESR) was calculated based on tender and swollen joint counts, patient global assessment, and ESR measurement performed as part of the study visit15,16. Disease activity was further characterized into remission or low (DAS28-ESR <3.2) or moderate or high (DAS28-ESR ≥3.2). For 11 patients who were missing ESR, we used the Clinical Disease Activity Index16 to determine disease activity category. Additionally, there were 13 patients missing FEV1 and FVC and 36 patients missing DLCO.
In COPDGene, the healthy controls provided demographic data and completed surveys at the baseline study visit. They were assessed with supine CT chest imaging performed using multi-detector CT scanners (at least 16 detector channels) with volumetric acquisitions at full inspiration as well as spirometry to obtain FVC, but DLCO was not obtained.
In SAIL-RA and COPDGene, the chest CT scans were reviewed by up to three thoracic radiologists for visual evidence of interstitial lung abnormalities according to the Fleischner criteria17, as previously described14.
QCT analysis
For both the early RA participants and healthy controls, we analyzed their baseline chest CT scans using a previously described QCT analysis method18. Briefly, an ensemble of convolutional neural networks was trained to identify 2D and 3D areas of imaged lung and classify the areas of interest as normal lung, emphysema, or interstitial abnormalities using factors such as tissue density and distance from the pleural surface. Interstitial abnormalities were further subclassified into ground glass opacities, nodular changes, linear scarring, reticular changes, or honeycombing. Each feature was then summed, standardized to total lung volume, and reported a percentage of lung occupied by each feature.
Statistical analysis
We compared baseline characteristics of the early RA participants to healthy controls using chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and t-tests for continuous variables. We compared the percentage of normal lung, interstitial abnormalities, and emphysema determined by QCT between the early RA participants and the healthy controls using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. We also compared the percentage of interstitial abnormality subfeatures between early RA participants and healthy controls. We also compared the percentage of normal lung, interstitial lung and subfeatures, and emphysema between early RA patients with and without interstitial lung abnormalities identified by thoracic radiologists. Those indeterminate for interstitial lung abnormalities were excluded for this analysis.
Among early RA participants, we examined the correlation between the percentage of QCT features (percentage of normal lung as well as interstitial abnormalities and emphysema) with DAS28-ESR, ESR, FVC % predicted, and DLCO % predicted using Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
We assessed the association of RA with QCT features in linear regression models. We included all early RA participants and healthy comparators and determined the association of RA with QCT features in unadjusted linear regression. We then repeated our analysis after additional adjustment for age and sex. In a sensitivity analysis, we limited our analysis to the n=125 early RA never smokers and compared these to the healthy controls (all of whom were never smokers).
Among the participants with early RA, we performed unadjusted linear regression models to investigate the associations between QCT features and demographics, lifestyle factors, RA characteristics, and PFT parameters. We then performed multivariable models that assessed for associations between QCT features and significant factors identified in the unadjusted models as well as sex, given the significant associations noted between sex and RA-related lung diseases in other studies1,19,20. We did not include FVC or DLCO in the multivariable model since these are affected by interstitial abnormalities and thus on the causal pathway.
All analyses were performed using SAS v9.4 (Cary, NC). Two-sided p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Study sample and baseline characteristics
We analyzed early RA participants (n=200) from SAIL-RA and non-RA never smokers (n=104) in COPDGene who served as the healthy controls. Baseline characteristics of these groups are described in Table 1. The mean age of early RA participants was 55.7 years (SD 13.9) and 62.0 years (SD 9.5) for the healthy controls. The majority of both groups – 74.5% of early RA and 68.3% of the healthy controls – were female. Both the early RA (85.0%) and healthy controls (93.3%) were predominantly White race. Of the early RA participants, 125 (62.5%) were never smokers.
Table 1:
Baseline characteristics of participants with early RA in SAIL-RA (n=200) compared with healthy controls in COPDGene (n=104)
| Characteristic | Early RA (n=200) | Healthy controls (n=104) |
|---|---|---|
| Demographics and Lifestyle | ||
| Age, years (mean, SD) | 55.7 (13.9) | 62.0 (9.5) |
| Female sex at birth | 149 (74.5%) | 71 (68.3%) |
| Race | ||
| Asian | 8 (4.0%) | 0 |
| Black | 10 (5.0%) | 7 (6.7%) |
| White | 170 (85.0%) | 97 (93.3%) |
| Other | 12 (6.0%) | 0 |
| Smoking status | ||
| Never | 125 (62.5%) | 104 (100.0%) |
| Past | 64 (32.0%) | 0 |
| Current | 11 (5.5%) | 0 |
| Smoking pack-years, median (IQR) | 0 (0, 7) | 0 |
| BMI, kg/m2, median (IQR) | 27.8 (24.3, 32.8) | 27.7 (24.6, 31.5) |
| PFTs | ||
| FEV1/FVC (median, IQR) | 0.78 (0.73, 0.82) | 0.80 (0.76, 0.84) |
| FEV1% predicted (median, IQR) | 97 (84.8, 108) | 101 (91, 113) |
| FVC% predicted (median, IQR) | 98.1 (87.5, 109) | 98 (90, 108) |
| DLCO% predicted (median, IQR) | 89 (76.6, 100) | - |
| FVC% predicted <80% | 27/192 (14.1%) | 7 (6.7%) |
| FEV1/FVC <70% | 29/193 (15.0%) | 0 |
| DLCO% predicted <75% | 38/169 (22.5%) | - |
| RA characteristics | ||
| RA duration, months (median, IQR) | 8.3 (4.1, 19.0) | - |
| DAS28-ESR (median, IQR) | 3.1 (2.0, 4.3) | - |
| TJC28 (median, IQR) | 1 (0, 4) | - |
| SJC28 (median, IQR) | 1 (0, 3) | - |
| PtGA (median, IQR) | 20 (10, 50) | - |
| ESR (median, IQR) | 16 (7, 33) | - |
| Disease activity | ||
| Remission/low | 107 (53.5%) | - |
| Moderate/high | 93 (46.5%) | - |
| Seropositive for anti-CCP and/or RF | 167/196 (85.2%) | - |
| Current medications | ||
| Glucocorticoids | 58 (29.0%) | 0 |
| Methotrexate | 141 (70.5%) | 0 |
| Other csDMARDs | 71 (35.5%) | 0 |
| TNFi | 38 (19.0%) | 0 |
| Non-TNFi b/tsDMARDs | 11 (5.5%) | 0 |
Anti-CCP = anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, b/tsDMARD = biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug, csDMARD = conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug, DAS28-ESR = disease activity score of 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, DLCO = diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity, HRCT = high resolution computed tomography, IQR = interquartile range, RF = rheumatoid factor, SD = standard deviation, SJC = swollen joint count, TJC = tender joint count, TNFi = tumor necrosis factor inhibitor
Among the early RA participants, the median RA duration at study baseline was 8.3 months (interquartile range - IQR 4.1 to 19.0) and 46.5% had moderate or high disease activity at baseline. Methotrexate was being used by 70.5% and 29.0% were using glucocorticoids at study baseline.
QCT results
When comparing the QCT results between early RA participants and healthy controls in unadjusted analyses (Table 2), the early RA participants had less normal lung (median 90.2% vs. 96.5%, p<0.0001), more interstitial abnormalities (median 3.7% vs. 1.6%, p<0.001), and slightly more emphysematous changes (median 0.7% vs. 0.5%, p=0.01). Early RA participants also had increased median percentage of interstitial abnormality subfeatures – median 3.5% vs. 1.5% (p<0.0001) for reticular changes; 0.03 vs. 0.01% (p<0.0001) for nodular changes, and 0.1% vs. 0.03% (p<0.0001) for honeycombing when to healthy controls.
Table 2:
Baseline QCT features of participants with early RA in SAIL-RA (n=200) compared with healthy controls in COPDGene (n=104)
| QCT features, % (median and IQR) | Early RA (n=200) | Healthy controls (n=104) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 90.2 (87.0, 92.5) | 96.5 (95.8, 97.2) | <0.0001 |
| Interstitial | 3.7 (2.1, 6.1) | 1.6 (0.8, 2.4) | <0.0001 |
| Reticular | 3.5 (1.9, 5.6) | 1.5 (0.8, 2.3) | <0.0001 |
| Ground glass | 0 (0, 0.03) | 0 (0, 0) | <0.0001 |
| Nodular | 0.03 (0.01, 0.2) | 0.01 (0, 0.03) | <0.0001 |
| Linear scar | 0.01 (0, 0.05) | 0.00 (0, 0.01) | <0.0001 |
| Honeycombing | 0.1 (0.07, 0.2) | 0.03 (0.02, 0.05) | <0.0001 |
| Emphysema | 0.7 (0.3, 1.3) | 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) | 0.01 |
| Paraseptal | 0.5 (0.2, 1.0) | 0.4 (0.2, 0.5) | 0.02 |
| Centrilobular | 0.2 (0.03, 0.4) | 0.1 (0.05, 0.2) | 0.28 |
Due to rounding and small amounts of unclassified lung, values may not add to 100%.
COPDGene = genetic epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease study, IQR = interquartile range, QCT = quantitative computed tomography, RA = rheumatoid arthritis, SAIL-RA = study of inflammatory arthritis and interstitial lung disease in early rheumatoid arthritis
When comparing early RA participants with visually-determined interstitial lung abnormalities to those without interstitial lung abnormalities, the patients with interstitial lung abnormalities had less normal lung (median 82.4% vs. 90.7%) and more quantitative interstitial abnormalities (median 11.4% vs. 3.3%) compared to those without interstitial lung abnormalities (Supplemental Table S1).
Early RA vs. Healthy controls for QCT features
In the multivariable linear regression models examining the association of RA status with QCT features (Table 3), we observed that early RA was associated with lower percentage of normal lung (−9.3%, 95%CI −10.8 to −7.8), increased interstitial abnormalities (4.6, 95%CI 3.3 to 5.9), and increased emphysema (0.7%, 95%CI 0.3 to 1.0). We observed similar findings when we restricted the early RA participants to the subgroup of n=125 participants who were never smokers (−8.5% less normal lung in early RA vs. healthy controls; p<0.0001).
Table 3:
Linear regression of QCT in participants with early RA in SAIL-RA (n=200) and subgroup of never smokers (n=125) compared with healthy non-smoking controls in COPDGene (n=104)
| QCT features | Adjusted* β (All early RA vs healthy controls) (95%CI) | p-value | Adjusted* β (Never smokers with early RA vs healthy controls) (95%CI) | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | −9.3 (−10.7, −7.8) | <0.0001 | −8.5 (−10.0, −7.1) | <0.0001 |
| Interstitial | 4.6 (3.2, 5.9) | <0.0001 | 3.9 (2.7, 5.1) | <0.0001 |
| Ground glass | 0.02 (0.003, 0.04) | 0.02 | 0.03 (0.01, 0.05) | 0.02 |
| Reticular | 4.2 (3, 5.4) | <0.0001 | 3.6 (2.5, 4.7) | <0.0001 |
| Nodular | 0.1 (0.06, 0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.1 (0.05, 0.2) | 0.0007 |
| Linear scar | 0.04 (0.03, 0.06) | <0.0001 | 0.02 (0.01, 0.04) | 0.0001 |
| Honeycombing | 0.2 (0.12, 0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.2 (0.11, 0.2) | <0.0001 |
| Emphysema | 0.7 (0.3, 1.0) | 0.0001 | 0.6 (0.2, 1.0) | 0.003 |
| Paraseptal | 0.4 (0.1, 0.6) | <0.0001 | 0.3 (0.2, 0.5) | 0.0005 |
| Centrilobular | 0.3 (0.1, 0.5) | 0.003 | 0.3 (0.03, 0.5) | 0.03 |
= multivariable linear regression adjusted for age and sex
CI = confidence interval, COPDGene = genetic epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease study, QCT = quantitative computed tomography, RA = rheumatoid arthritis, SAIL-RA = study of inflammatory arthritis and interstitial lung disease in early rheumatoid arthritis
Associations with QCT interstitial abnormalities among early RA participants
We then examined correlations between QCT features and DAS28-ESR, ESR, FVC % predicted, and DLCO % predicted among the early RA participants. Results are displayed in Figure 1 and Supplemental Figures S1–S2. We observed that QCT interstitial percentage was positively correlated with DAS28-ESR (rho=0.22, p=0.003) and ESR (rho=0.30, p<0.0001). Additionally, QCT interstitial percentage was inversely correlated with FVC % predicted (rho=−0.26, p=0.0003) and DLCO % predicted (rho=−0.44, p<0.0001).
Figure 1: Among participants with early RA in SAIL-RA, correlations of QCT interstitial changes with (A) forced vital capacity, (B) diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide, (C) erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and (D) DAS28-ESR disease activity.
DAS28-ESR = disease activity score with 28 joints and with ESR, DLCO % = diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide % predicted, ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate, FVC % = forced vital capacity % predicted, QCT = quantitative computed tomography
Results from the linear regression models examining the associations between baseline factors with percentage of interstitial abnormalities on QCT are displayed in Table 4. In these models, the β represents the increase or decrease in the percentage of interstitial abnormalities associated with each factor. In the unadjusted models, older age (0.2% per year, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.2), past smoking status (+2.2% ever vs. never smoking, 95%CI 0.2 to 4.3), DAS28-ESR (+0.6 per unit, 95%CI 0.02 to 1.3), higher ESR (+0.08 per mm/hr, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.1), RF-positive status (+2.2 vs. negative 95%CI 0.001 to 4.4) were each associated with higher QCT interstitial percent. Decreasing FVC % predicted (−0.09 per unit, 95%CI −0.2 to −0.03) and DLCO (−0.2 per unit, 95%CI −0.2 to −0.1) were inversely associated with QCT interstitial percentage.
Table 4:
Associations of baseline factors with percentage of interstitial changes on QCT among participants with early RA in SAIL-RA (n=200)
| Characteristic | Unadjusted β | 95%CI | p-value | Multivariable* β | 95%CI | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics | ||||||
| Age at RA (per year) | 0.2 | (0.1, 0.2) | <0.0001 | 0.1 | (0.07, 0.2) | 0.0001 |
| Age at RA, categorical | ||||||
| <60 years | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
| ≥60 years | 3.8 | (1.9, 5.6) | <0.0001 | |||
| Male (vs. female) | 1.0 | (−1.2, 3.2) | 0.36 | 0.9 | (−1.3, 3.1) | 0.43 |
| Lifestyle | ||||||
| Smoking status | ||||||
| Never | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Past | 2.2 | (0.1, 4.3) | 0.04 | 0.6 | (−1.5, 2.6) | 0.58 |
| Current | −0.4 | (−4.6, 3.8) | 0.84 | −2.8 | (−7.0, 1.5) | 0.20 |
| Smoking pack-years (per unit) | −0.003 | (−0.03, 0.02) | 0.81 | |||
| BMI (per unit) | 0.06 | (−0.1, 0.2) | 0.43 | |||
| RA characteristics | ||||||
| DAS28-ESR (per unit) | 0.6 | (0.02, 1.3) | 0.04 | 0.6 | (0.01, 1.3) | 0.046 |
| TJC28 (per unit) | 0.02 | (−0.2, 0.2) | 0.82 | |||
| SJC28 (per unit) | 0.03 | (−0.2, 0.3) | 0.81 | |||
| PtGA (per unit) | 0.02 | (−0.02, 0.05) | 0.34 | |||
| ESR (per unit) | 0.08 | (0.03, 0.1) | 0.0006 | |||
| Moderate/high DAS28-ESR (vs. remission/low) | 3.2 | (1.3, 5.1) | 0.0009 | |||
| Seropositive (vs. seronegative) | 0.9 | (−1.9, 3.6) | 0.54 | |||
| Anti-CCP positive (vs. anti-CCP negative) | 0.7 | (−1.5, 3.0) | 0.54 | |||
| RF positive (vs. RF negative) | 2.2 | (0.001, 4.4) | 0.05 | 1.8 | (−0.4, 3.9) | 0.11 |
| Current medications | ||||||
| Glucocorticoids (vs. not) | 2.1 | (−0.03, 4.1) | 0.054 | |||
| Methotrexate (vs. not) | 0.6 | (−1.5, 2.7) | 0.58 | |||
| TNF inhibitors (vs. not) | −1.5 | (−3.9, 0.9) | 0.22 | |||
| PFTs | ||||||
| FEV1/FVC (per unit) | −0.1 | (−0.6, 0.3) | 0.54 | |||
| FEV1% (per unit) | −0.04 | (−0.1, 0.01) | 0.13 | |||
| FVC% (per unit) | −0.09 | (−0.1, −0.03) | 0.002 | |||
| DLCO% (per unit) | −0.2 | (−0.2, −0.1) | <0.0001 |
= multivariable linear regression adjusted for age at RA diagnosis, sex, smoking status, RF status, and DAS28-ESR
Anti-CCP = anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody, csDMARD = conventional synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drug, DAS28-ESR = disease activity score of 28 joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate, DLCO = diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity, HRCT = high resolution computed tomography, IQR = interquartile range, MRC = modified research council, QCT = quantitative computed tomography, RF = rheumatoid factor, SD = standard deviation, SJC = swollen joint count, TJC = tender joint count, TNFi = tumor necrosis factor inhibitor
In the multivariable model that included age (per year), sex, smoking status, and DAS28-ESR (Table 4), older age (0.1 per year, 95%CI 0.07 to 0.2, p=0.0001) and higher DAS28-ESR (0.6 per unit, 95%CI 0.01 to 1.3, p=0.046) were significantly associated with higher interstitial percentage. We observed similar findings in the analyses examining the associations of the same baseline factors with percentage of normal lung by QCT (Supplemental Table S2), with older age and higher DAS28-ESR associated with less normal lung by QCT in the multivariable model. There were no statistically significant associations between the baseline factors with QCT emphysema percentage except for older age and male sex (Supplemental Table S3).
DISCUSSION
In this prospective, multicenter cohort study of participants with early RA, we found that the patients with early RA had a median of about 9% less normal lung by a QCT deep-learning measure of HRCT than healthy controls, not explained by age, sex, or smoking. This was mostly explained by excess interstitial abnormalities. We found that older age and higher RA disease activity were associated with increased interstitial abnormalities by QCT. These findings emphasize the importance of further studies investigating the use of QCT for screening and monitoring of RA-ILD and the role of inflammation in RA-ILD pathogenesis. This also suggests that normal lung architecture may be lost in pre-RA and early RA, emphasizing the need to identify strategies to preserve lung health in people with RA.
Our study adds to the prior literature investigating pulmonary abnormalities in the early RA period. In a prior study using the SAIL-RA cohort, we demonstrated that 11% of participants with early RA had subclinical ILD detected using visual inspection. We noted a strong association between subclinical ILD and moderate or high RA disease activity14. Another prior study of 36 Australian patients with RA, with less than 2 years of RA joint disease found that 58% had ILD-related abnormalities on a series of pulmonary tests that included HRCT, bronchoalveolar lavage, and nuclear scanning21. Another investigation performed HRCT in 105 Swedish patients with early untreated RA and found that 54% had some form of parenchymal lung abnormalities including nodules and interstitial abnormalities 22. A Japanese study of n=65 patients with less than 1 year of RA disease duration found that 13.8% had classical ILD patterns on HRCT23. Our findings further emphasize the significant burden of often subclinical lung findings in the early RA period.
To our knowledge, this is the first study with a specific focus on QCT findings in an early RA population while including healthy controls. One prior study examined 193 patients with RA with a median RA disease duration of 8 years and found that high attenuation areas on QCT analysis were associated with known RA-ILD risk factors including the MUC5B promoter variant, cigarette smoking, and higher levels of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies but did not include healthy controls24. Another general population-based study performed in the MESA cohort demonstrated an association between high attenuation areas on cardiac CT and RA-associated autoantibodies, though they could not identify RA diagnosis or duration25. We led a prior study investigating participants with prevalent RA among the smoker group in the COPDGene study and found that RA was associated with increased quantitative interstitial abnormalities compared to non-RA smokers26. While those studies were largely focused on subclinical ILD, one recent study demonstrated that among patients with known RA-ILD, the percentage of interstitial QCT features was associated with mortality27. Notably, the ongoing FIBRONEER-SARD trial, which is investigating the use of nerandomilast in patients with RA-ILD and other forms of systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated ILD is using a different QCT measure of fibrosis as a primary trial endpoint28.
Our study has several strengths to consider. First, we used a QCT measure that has demonstrated strong associations between quantitative abnormalities and key outcomes, including all-cause mortality in large population-based cohorts10,29. Second, we included healthy, non-smoking controls and demonstrated an association between RA status and QCT interstitial abnormalities, including after adjustment for age and sex and in our secondary analysis that compared never smoker early RA participants to the healthy controls. Finally, we focused on the early RA period, when early detection of subtle abnormalities may be of significant clinical and research interest.
Our study also has certain limitations to consider. First, although the healthy controls and early RA patients used the same QCT analysis protocol, the participants were recruited during different years and at different sites, which may impact our comparisons. Second, the majority of SAIL-RA participants were female and agreed to actively participate in a longitudinal research study. Thus, the generalizability of our findings to the general RA population or to more male-predominant RA populations remains unknown. Third, although quantitative interstitial abnormalities have been associated with increased mortality in population-based studies, the clinical significance of the interstitial subfeatures (e.g., “honeycombing”) is not currently known. Additionally, although we used a validated QCT method18, other methods such as using high attenuation areas24,25, CALIPER30, SATORI31, and QILD32 are available and may offer different results. Also, findings from the QCT-derived interstitial variable may be due to causes from other forms of lung injury that include inhalant or smoking injury, infection, and scarring so may not be due to ILD. Fourth, data on key genetic risk factors like the MUC5B promoter variant or proteomics markers such as Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) are not currently available for SAIL-RA participants. Finally, this analysis represents a cross-sectional analysis of the SAIL-RA cohort. Future studies to investigate the progression and impact of subclinical interstitial abnormalities are ongoing.
In conclusion, we found that participants with early RA had less normal lung and higher percentage of interstitial abnormalities detected by QCT when compared to non-RA comparators. Interstitial abnormalities in early RA correlated with pulmonary function test parameters and were associated with higher RA disease activity. These findings highlight the promise of QCT measures for detection and monitoring of RA-ILD in the early RA period and suggest that inflammation plays a central role in the genesis of ILD in early RA. Finally, these results emphasize that significant lung damage may have accrued by the time patients are diagnosed with RA and highlight the urgent need to improve disease detection methods and strategies to preserve lung health in RA.
Supplementary Material
Funding:
GCM is supported by the Rheumatology Research Foundation Scientist Development Award. KDD is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases R01 AR077607. BRE is supported by the VA CSR&D (I01 CX002972, IK2 CX002203), the Rheumatology Research Foundation, and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54 GM115458), which funds the Great Plains IDeA-CTR Network. MHC is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL135142). JAS is supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (grant numbers R01 AR080659, R01 AR077607, P30 AR070253, and P30 AR072577), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes (grant number R01 HL155522), the Arthritis Foundation, the R. Bruce and Joan M. Mickey Research Scholar Fund, and the Llura Gund Award funded by the Gordon and Llura Gund Foundation. This work was supported by a Research Support Fund grant from the Nebraska Health System and the University of Nebraska Medical Center. COPDGene was supported by Award Number U01 HL089897, Award Number U01 HL089856, and by NIH contract 75N92023D00011 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. COPDGene is also supported by the COPD Foundation through contributions made to an Industry Advisory Board that has included AstraZeneca, Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sunovion. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute or the National Institutes of Health.
Conflicts of interest:
GCM reports research support from Boehringer Ingelheim. MLP reports stock ownership for United Health Group. NK reports grant support from AstraZeneca. PAJ reports honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, and AstraZeneca, and grant support from Novartis, unrelated to this work. TJD is currently a full-time employee of Sanofi and has received support from Bayer and Sanofi. PFD reports grant support from Genentech and Bristol Myers Squibb; royalties or licenses from UpToDate, Inc; and participation on a Federal Drug Administration advisory board. RSJE received grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim, and he is a cofounder and equity holder of Quantitative Imaging Solutions. GRW reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; consultancy for Pulmonx, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Vertex; and is founder and co-owner of Quantitative Imaging Solutions. MHC reports grant support from Bayer and consultancy from Apogee and BMS. EKS has received institutional grant support from Bayer and Northpond Laboratories. MBB reports institutional grant support from Genentech, Mitsubishi, and Prometheus; consultancy for Johnson & Johnson and Boehringer Ingelheim; payment or honoraria from Medscape, the American Board of Internal Medicine, and Elsevier; and leadership/fiduciary roles with the American College of Rheumatology and American Board of Rheumatology. KDD has received research support from Boehringer Ingelheim. DK reports grants or contracts from the US Department of Defense, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Merck, consultancy from Abbvie, Amgen, Argenx, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cabaletta, Certa, Merck, Novartis, and Fate Therapeutics; participation in a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Abbvie. BRE has received research support from Boehringer Ingelheim and consulted with Boehringer Ingelheim and Artiva Biotherapeutics. JAS has received research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Sonoma Biotherapeutics and performed consultancy for AbbVie, Amgen, Anaptys, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead, Inova Diagnostics, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, MustangBio, Optum, Pfizer, Sana, Sobi, and ReCor unrelated to this work. Other authors report no financial disclosures.
Footnotes
Disclaimer: The funders had no role in the decision to publish or in the preparation of this article. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of Harvard University, its affiliated academic healthcare centres or the National Institutes of Health.
REFERENCES
- 1.Bongartz T, Nannini C, Medina-Velasquez YF, et al. Incidence and mortality of interstitial lung disease in rheumatoid arthritis - A population-based study. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62(6):1583–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hyldgaard C, Hilberg O, Pedersen AB, et al. A population-based cohort study of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: Comorbidity and mortality. Ann Rheum Dis 2017;76(10):1700–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Duarte AC, Porter JC, Leandro MJ. The lung in a cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients-an overview of different types of involvement and treatment. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019;58(11):2031–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang D, Zhang J, Lau J, et al. Mechanisms of lung disease development in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019;15(10):581–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Raimundo K, Solomon JJ, Olson AL, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis-Interstitial Lung Disease in the United States: Prevalence, Incidence, and Healthcare Costs and Mortality. J Rheumatol 2019;46(4):360–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hata A, Schiebler ML, Lynch DA, Hatabu H. Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: State of the Art. Radiology 2021;301(1):19–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Weatherley ND, Eaden JA, Stewart NJ, et al. Experimental and quantitative imaging techniques in interstitial lung disease. Thorax 2019;74(6):611–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McDermott GC, Doyle TJ, Sparks JA. Interstitial lung disease throughout the rheumatoid arthritis disease course. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2021;33(3):284–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ash SY, Choi B, Oh A, Lynch DA, Humphries SM. Deep Learning Assessment of Progression of Emphysema and Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Abnormality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2023;208(6):666–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Choi B, Adan N, Doyle TJ, et al. Quantitative Interstitial Abnormality Progression and Outcomes in the Genetic Epidemiology of COPD and Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study Cohorts. Chest 2023;163(1):164–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62(9):2569–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Regan EA, Hokanson JE, Murphy JR, et al. Genetic epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study design. COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2010;7(1):32–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Maselli DJ, Bhatt SP, Anzueto A, et al. Clinical Epidemiology of COPD: Insights From 10 Years of the COPDGene Study. Chest 2019;156(2):228–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.McDermott GC, Gill R, Byrne S, et al. Risk factors for interstitial lung disease in early rheumatoid arthritis and external validation of screening strategies: a cross-sectional analysis of the prospective SAIL-RA cohort in the USA. Lancet Rheumatol [Internet] 2025;7(12):e851–63. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2665991325001584 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.van der Heijde DM, van ’t Hof MA, van Riel PL, et al. Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score. Ann Rheum Dis 1990;49(11):916–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aletaha D, Nell VPK, Stamm T, et al. Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score. Arthritis Res Ther 2005;7(4):R796–806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hatabu H, Hunninghake GM, Richeldi L, et al. Interstitial lung abnormalities detected incidentally on CT: a Position Paper from the Fleischner Society. Lancet Respir Med 2020;8(7):726–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bermejo-Peláez D, Ash SY, Washko GR, San José Estépar R, Ledesma-Carbayo MJ. Classification of Interstitial Lung Abnormality Patterns with an Ensemble of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Sci Rep 2020;10(1). [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kelly CA, Saravanan V, Nisar M, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis-related interstitial lung disease: Associations, prognostic factors and physiological and radiological characteristics-a large multicentre UK study. Rheumatology (United Kingdom) 2014;53(9):1676–82. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kiely P, Busby AD, Nikiphorou E, et al. Is incident rheumatoid arthritis interstitial lung disease associated with methotrexate treatment? Results from a multivariate analysis in the ERAS and ERAN inception cohorts. BMJ Open 2019;9(5). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gabbay E, Tarala R, Will R, et al. Interstitial lung disease in recent onset rheumatoid arthritis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156(2 I):528–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Reynisdottir G, Karimi R, Joshua V, et al. Structural changes and antibody enrichment in the lungs are early features of anti-citrullinated protein antibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol [Internet] 2014;66(1):31–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24449573 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mori S, Cho I, Koga Y, Sugimoto M. Comparison of pulmonary abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography in patients with early versus longstanding rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology 2008;35(8):1513–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Alevizos MK, Danoff SK, Pappas DA, et al. Assessing predictors of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease using quantitative lung densitometry. Rheumatology (Oxford) [Internet] 2022;61(7):2792–804. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34747452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bernstein EJ, Barr RG, Austin JHM, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis-associated autoantibodies and subclinical interstitial lung disease: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Thorax 2016;71(12):1082–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.McDermott GC, Hayashi K, Yoshida K, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis, quantitative parenchymal lung features and mortality among smokers. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2025;64(1):133–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Oh JH, Kim GHJ, Cross G, et al. Automated quantification system predicts survival in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2022;61(12):4702–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.ClinicalTrials.gov. A Study to Test Whether Nerandomilast Helps People With Lungfibrosis Related to Rheumatic Diseases (NCT06806592). 2025; [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ash SY, Harmouche R, Putman RK, et al. Clinical and Genetic Associations of Objectively Identified Interstitial Changes in Smokers. Chest 2017;152(4):780–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zavaletta VA, Bartholmai BJ, Robb RA. High resolution multidetector CT-aided tissue analysis and quantification of lung fibrosis. Acad Radiol 2007;14(7):772–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hoffmann T, Teichgräber U, Lassen-Schmidt B, et al. Artificial intelligence-based quantification of pulmonary HRCT (AIqpHRCT) for the evaluation of interstitial lung disease in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Int 2024;44(11):2483–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kim HJ, Li G, Gjertson D, et al. Classification of parenchymal abnormality in scleroderma lung using a novel approach to denoise images collected via a multicenter study. Acad Radiol 2008;15(8):1004–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

