Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 12;16:1778687. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1778687

Table 1.

Research trials on multimodal combination therapy related to omCSPC.

Author Trials Number of metastasis Treatment (patients) Control (patients) Results Safety
Boevé LMS (54) HORRAD ≥1† ADT + EBRT[216] ADT[216] mOS: 45 (40.4–49.6) vs 43 (32.6–53.4) months; mPSA-PFS: 15 (11.8–18.2) vs 12 (10.6–13.4) months
Parker CC (35) STAMPEDE ≥1† ADT+RT[1032] ADT[1029] FFS: HR 0.76 Grade ≥3 AEs: 39% vs 38%
Decaestecker K (42), Ost P (43) STOMP ≤3‡ MDT +AS[31] AS[31] mADT-FS: 21 (14–29) vs 13 (12–17) months Grade 1 AEs: 19% vs –
Armstrong AJ (55), Armstrong AJ (56) ARCHES ≤5† Enzalutamide+ADT[224] PBO+ADT[221] OS: HR 0.59; rPFS: HR 0.27 Grade 3 AEs: 27% vs 26%; Grade >3 AEs: 21% vs 20%
>5 Enzalutamide+ADT[220] PBO+ADT[242] OS: HR 0.55; rPFS: HR 0.33 Grade 3 AEs: 20% vs 22%; Grade >3 AEs: 14% vs 20%
Saad F (57) ARANOTE ≥1† Darolutamide+ADT[446] PBO+ADT[223] OS: HR 0.81; rPFS: HR 0.54 Grade 3–4 AEs: 30.8% vs 30.3%; Grade 5 AEs: 4.7% vs 5.4%
Chi KN (58), Chi KN (59) TITAN ≥1† Apalutamide+ADT[525] PBO+ADT[527] 24-month OS: 82.4% vs 73.5%; 24-month rPFS: 68.2% vs 47.5% Grade 3–4 AEs: 42.4% vs 40.8%
Sweeney CJ (60) ENZAMET ≥1† TS+Enzalutamide[563] TS+NSAA[562] 5-year OS: 67% vs 57%; PSA-PFS: 54% vs 25%; cPFS: 56% vs 28% Grade 3–4 AEs: 47% vs 33%; Grade 5 AEs: 2% vs 2%
Agarwal N (61) SWOG-1216 ≥1† ADT+Orteronel[638] ADT+ Bicalutamide[641] mOS: 47.6 vs 23.0 months; mPFS: 81.1 vs 70.2 months Grade 3–4 AEs: 43% vs 14%
Fizazi K (62), Fizazi K (63) LATITUDE ≥3† AAP+ADT[597] PBO+ADT[602] mOS: NR vs 34.7 months; mrPFS: 33.0 vs 14.8 months Grade 3–4 AEs: 63% vs 48%; Grade 5 AEs: 28% vs 24%
Kyriakopoulos CE (64) ECOG3805 CHAARTED ≤3† ADT+DTX[134] ADT [143] mOS: NR
>3 ADT+DTX[263] ADT [250] mOS: 51.2 vs 34.4 months
Marvaso G (41) RADIOSA ≤3‡ ADT + SBRT[53] SBRT[52] mPFS: 32.2 (22.4–NR) vs 15.1 (12.4–13.4) months Grade ≥3 AEs: 2% vs 0%
Gravis G (65) GETUG-AFU 15 ≥1† ADT +DTX[192] ADT[193] mOS: 58.9 (50.8–69.1) vs 54.2 (42.2–NR) months
Deek MP (66) ≤5‡ MDT+ADT[105] MDT[158] 5-year bPFS: 24% vs 29%; dPFS: 11% vs 19%; cPFS: 41% vs 9%
Tang C (40) EXTEND ≤5† RP+intermittent ADT[43] intermittent ADT[44] mPFS: NR vs 15.8 (13.6–21.2) months Grade 3 AEs: 7.0% vs 4.5%
Conde-Moreno AJ (67) SBRT-SG 05 ≤3† ADT + SBRT[67] bRFS/PFS: 1-yr 91%/92%, 2-yr 73.7%/81%, 3-yr 50.6%/67% Grade ≥3 AEs: None
Fizazi K (68) PEACE-1 ≥1† ADT+DTX +AA[335] ADT+DTX[335] OS: HR 0.75; rPFS: HR 0.50 Grade ≥3 AEs: 63% vs 52%
Hussain M (69) ARASENS ≤3† Darolutamide+ADT+DTX [154] PBO+ADT+DTX [146] OS: HR 0.68 Grade 3–4 AEs: 70.1% vs 61.1%
>3 Darolutamide+ADT+DTX [497] PBO+ADT+DTX [508] OS: HR 0.69 Grade 3–4 AEs: 64.9% vs 64.2%
Turner PG (70) ADRRAD ≤3† ADT +RP+Radium-223[30] mPFS: 20.5 months Grade 3 AEs: 20%
Nickols NG (71) SOLAR ≤5† RT\RP+AAT+SBRT[24] Primary endpoint met: 20/24 (no progression); 3/4 non-responders progressed Grade ≥3 AEs: 12.5%
Nikitas J (72) SATURN ≤5‡ ADT+AAT+SBRT[26] PSA <0.05 ng/ml at 6 months: 13/26 patients Grade 2/3 AEs: 21%/21%

† Synchronous omCSPC.

‡ Metachronous omCSPC.

ADT, androgen deprivation therapy; EBRT, external beam radiation therapy; mOS, median overall survival; mPSA-PFS, median prostate-specific antigen-progression-free survival; RT, Radiotherapy; FFS, Failure-Free Survival; HR, hazard ratio; AEs, adverse events; G1-5, grade1-5; MDT, Metastases-directed therapy; AS, active surveillance; mADT-FS, median ADT-free survival; PBO, placebo; rPFS, radiographic progression-free survival; DTX, Docetaxel; SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy; mPFS, median progression-free survival; AAP, abiraterone acetate and prednisone; NR, not reached; bPFS, Biochemical progression-free survival; dPFS, distant progression-free survival; cPFS, combined biochemical progression-free survival; RP, radical prostatectomy; bRFS, biochemical recurrence-free survival; TS, testosterone suppression; NSAA, non-steroidal antiandrogen (bicalutamide, nilutamide, or flutamide).