Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 27;16(12):11217–11245. doi: 10.1039/d5ra10006b

Table 4. Material layers used in PSCs with advantages, limitations, and recycling implications79.

Material layer Material options Advantages Limitations Recycling implications
Substrate Glass Excellent thermal stability Rigid Highly compatible with mechanical recycling
Strong barrier against moisture and chemicals Relatively expensive Can be integrated into existing silicon PV recycling streams
Polymers (PET, PEN) Flexible and lightweight Poor heat resistance Recycling is challenging under harsh thermal/chemical treatments
Lower cost Brittle under stress
Transparent conducting electrode FTO (fluorine-doped tin oxide) Good thermal stability Higher surface roughness Durable and less prone to degradation during recycling
Cost-effective
ITO (indium-doped tin oxide) Smooth surface Lower thermal stability Recycling is critical to recover indium, a scarce raw material
High optical transparency Expensive
ETL (electron transport layer) Inorganic (TiO2, SnO2, ZnO) Stable Strong adhesion to substrates complicates separation Difficult to recycle due to tight bonding with substrates
Low-cost
Easy fabrication
Organic (PCBM) Low processing temperature Poor stability Degrades under heat/solvent exposure
Low electron mobility Removal requires toxic solvents (e.g., chlorobenzene)
HTL (hole transport layer) Inorganic (NiOx, CuSCN) Chemically and thermally stable Possible interfacial reactions Strong adhesion reduces recyclability
Cost-effective
Organic (PEDOT: PSS, spiro-OMeTAD, PTAA) Solution-processable High cost Dopants complicate chemical separation during recycling
Enhanced charge transport Complex synthesis, poor long-term stability
Perovskite layer Pb-based High efficiency Toxicity concerns Pb recovery is essential to prevent environmental contamination
Tin-based Non-toxic Easily oxidized Oxidation complicates recovery and reuse
Air instability
Bismuth-based Stable Low efficiency Recycling pathways are not yet established
Low toxicity Early-stage technology
Back electrode Gold (Au) Excellent conductivity Very expensive. Requires vacuum deposition Can be selectively etched and recovered
High work function
Silver (Ag) Lower cost than gold Diffusion into perovskite Recoverable, but diffusion complicates separation
Requires vacuum deposition
Copper (Cu) Low cost Prone to oxidation Residual halides contaminate copper during recycling
Good conductivity
Carbon (C) Cheap Low work function Difficult to isolate during recycling
Chemically inert