Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 14;60(4):299–308. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255

TABLE 3.

Summary of Mean Effect Estimates From Meta-analysis for Sensitivity, Specificity, PPVadj, and NPVadj for the TSP-9 Test [mean, (95% CI)]

Sensitivity* Specificity* NPVadj (TSP-9 high/int risk)* PPVadj (TSP-9 high/int risk)* PPVadj (TSP-9 high risk)
Common-effect model 0.61 (0.54; 0.68) 0.81 (0.78; 0.84) 0.97 (0.96; 0.98) 0.14 (0.09; 0.21) 0.28 (0.17; 0.42)
Random-effects model 0.62 (0.48;0.75) 0.81 (0.77; 0.85) 0.97 (0.96; 0.98) 0.14 (0.09; 0.21) 0.28 (0.17; 0.42)
*

For the calculation of sensitivity and specificity, NPVadj, and PPVadj, TSP-9 high- and intermediate-risk (high/int) results were combined.

The PPVadj was also calculated using the TSP-9 high-risk result. For this analysis, the Khoshiwal et al, 202324 study was not included because the number of only high-risk results was not reported.

PPVadj indicates prevalence-adjusted positive predictive value; NPVadj, prevalence-adjusted negative predictive value; TSP-9, tissue systems pathology-9; CI, confidence interval.