Abstract
Transmembrane protein tetraspanins either promote or suppress tumor invasion and metastasis. Their effects on tumor progression depend on the multimolecular transmembrane complex called tetraspanin-enriched microdomain (TEM) and are attributed to the alterations in the 1) motogenic and mitogenic behaviors and/or 2) microenvironmental interactions of tumor cells. As the modifiers of cell membrane structure and function, tetraspanins have emerged as diagnostic and prognostic markers and therapeutic targets for tumor progression.
Introduction
Tumor cells progress through multiple and orchestrated steps before the metastatic lesions are established in distant organs. Among the progression, cell motility-related metastatic steps include the invasion before intravasation, intravasation, extravasation, and invasion after extravasation. Success in these steps requires the coordination between tumor cell-cell adhesion, cell-matrix adhesion, matrix degradation, and cell migration. Notably, transmembrane proteins of the tetraspanin superfamily directly regulate all of these cellular events (1–5). Tetraspanin are the type III proteins that contain four membrane-spanning segments with conserved CCG motifs, transmembrane polar residues, and multiple acylation sites (Figure 1) and are widely expressed in all eukaryocytes (1–5). Importantly, tetraspanins regulate not only the motility-related behaviors of tumor cells but also the interaction between tumor cells and their microenvironment. For example, CD151 promotes the neovascularization in breast cancer xenografts (6), and Tspan8 or CO-029 elevates the angiogenesis of pancreatic cancer through secreted exosomes (7–8). Another characteristic related to tumor progression of tetraspanins is their ability to organize other transmembrane proteins such as cell adhesion molecules, growth factor receptors, and proteases into membrane complexes termed tetraspanin webs, glycosynapses, or tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs), with which intracellular signaling proteins such as PI4K, PKC, and syntenin are associated (3, 9–14). Upon partition into TEMs, the activity of these transmembrane proteins becomes altered, although the biochemical and biophysical mechanisms remain unclear. Of the 33 human tetraspanins, approximately half have been experimentally studied, and several have been shown to correlate with tumor patient prognosis and regulate tumor progression and metastasis. This review focuses on the roles and mechanisms of relatively better understood tetraspanins, i.e., CD9, CD63, CD82, CD151, and Tspan8, in tumor invasion and metastasis (Table 1).
Figure 1. Schematic depiction of tetraspanins and tetraspanin-enriched microdomain (TEM).


(A) Tetraspanins feature four transmembrane, two extracellular (EC1 and EC2), and an intracellular N-terminal, loop, and C-terminal domains. Most tetraspanins are glycosylated in either EC2 or EC1 domains. For example, CD63, CD82, CD151, and Tspan8 are glycosylated in EC2 while CD9 in EC1. The cysteine residues in EC2, typically in even number, form disulfide bonds, while the cysteine residues proximal to the interface between inner leaflet and cytosol are constantly palmitoylated. Characteristic strong polar residues are found in the transmembrane domains. Some tetraspanins such as CD63, CD82, CD151, and Tspan8 also contain “YXXΦ” sorting motif in C-terminus while others such as CD9 do not. Letters denote the code of amino acids. (B) TEMs are formed on the basis of dimeric tetraspanins, and these dimers further associate with each other to form multimeric tetraspanin complex in which cell adhesion proteins, growth factor receptors, proteases, and intracellular signaling proteins are sequestered. TEMs likely interact with a specific set of membrane lipid and alter the glycosylation of membrane molecules.
| Roles in tumor progression | Tumors involved | Associated proteins | Expression patterns in nontumor tissues | Possible mechanisms involved in tumor progression | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tspan 8 (CO-029) | Correlates | Colorectal, gastric, esophageal, pancreatic, and liver cancers | Tetraspanins CD9 and CD81 IgSF member FPRP EpCAM CD44 Integrins α6β4, α3β1, and α6β1 Intracellular protein PI4K. |
Epithelial, endothelial, muscle, and nerve tissues | Facilitates metastasis by promoting angiogenesis. |
| CD151 | Correlates | Breast, prostate, colon, liver, pancreas, lung, and gum cancers | Tetraspanins CD9, CD63, CD81, CD82, and Tspan 8 IgSF member EWI-2 EpCAM Integrins α3β1, α5β1, α6β1, and α6β4 Intracellular proteins PI4K and PKC |
Epithelial, endothelial, platelets, and muscle tissues | Facilitates metastasis by promoting invasion, intravasation, and probably angiogenesis and by upregulating proteases responsible for degrading extracellular matrix. |
| CD9 | Inversely correlates | Lung, breast, colon, skin, ovary, uterus, stomach, oral cavity, head and neck, prostate, and pancreas cancers and hematopoietic malignancy | Tetraspanins CD63, CD81, CD82, CD151, and Tspan8 IgSF members EWI-2, FPRP, and ICAM Integrins α2β1, α3β1, α5β1, and α6β1 Intracellular proteins PI4K and PKC |
Epithelial, endothelial, muscle, nerve, and hematopoietic tissues | Downregulates the motility of tumor cells and growth factor signaling in tumor cells, regulates the activity of matrix-degrading enzymes, and forms a complex with podoplanin, which sensitizes tumor cells to be arrested in microcirculation or to be lysed by IL2-activated T and NK cells. |
| CD63 | Probably inversely correlates | Melanoma, ovarian tumor, and lung cancer | Tetraspanins CD9, CD81, CD82, and CD151. Integrins α4β1, α3β1, α5β1, α6β1, and αIIbβ3. Intracellular proteins PI4K and syntenin-1 |
Ubiquitously expressed as a lysosome marker | Facilitates the transport of matrix-degrading proteins to lysosome to be degraded and upregulates the activity of MMP inhibitors. |
| CD82 | Inversely correlates | Prostate, breast, lung, bladder, colon, pancreas, stomach, liver, oral, esophageal, penile, and endometrial cancers | Tetraspanins CD9, CD63, CD81, and CD151. IgSF member EWI-2 Integrins α3β1, α4β1, and α6β1 |
Epithelial, endothelial, and hematopoietic tissues | Downregulates the signaling pathways of its associated proteins such as cell adhesion molecules and growth factor receptors to inhibit cell motility, probably also alters the compartmentalization and cytoskeletal interaction of plasma membrane to inhibit cell motility, and interacts with DARC on endothelial cells to cause the senescence of tumor cells. |
Tumor progression-promoting tetraspanins
Tspan8
Tspan8 or CO-029 was originally identified as a tumor-associated antigen (15), and its expression correlates with, or promotes, tumor progression (7, 16–18). The upregulation of Tspan8 expression is associated with the progression of pancreatic, hepatic, esophageal, gastric, and colorectal carcinomas, i.e., higher Tspan8 expressions are typically found in the more advanced stages of these tumors (15, 17–20). The occurrence and level of Tspan8 expression seem associated with the poor prognosis of gastrointestinal tumor patients.
The forced expression of Tspan8 in pancreatic and esophageal tumor cells promotes the metastasis to a distal organ like lung in animal spontaneous and/or experimental metastasis assays (16, 20). Tspan8 also facilitates the intrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular tumor cells (21). It appears that tumor cells expressing Tspan8 prefer metastasizing without stopping in lymph nodes. In pancreatic tumor, Tspan8 expression leads to the hemorrhage around primary and metastatic tumors and disseminated intravascular coagulation (16)
The forced expression of Tspan8 results in ADAM12m-mediated enhancement of the migratory and invasive abilities of esophageal tumor cells (20). Notably, Tspan8 promotes tumor angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer animal models by enhancing endothelial cell migration and proliferation, capillary sprouting, and endothelial progenitor cell maturation (7–8). Through the tumor-secreted exosomes that are enriched with integrin α4 and VCAM-1, Tspan8-expressing tumor cells upregulate the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor, chemokines and their receptors, von Willebrand factor, and Tspan8 itself in endothelial cells and VEGF, matrix matalloproteinases (MMPs), and urokinase plasminogen activator (UPA) in tumor-adjacent fibroblasts (7–8).
In addition to the classical constituents of TEM such as tetraspanins, integrins, and IgSF proteins, Tspan8-enriched microdomain also contains EpCAM, CD44v6, claudin 7, and C4.4A in colorectal cancer and pancreatic cells (16, 18, 22–23). Also in colorectal and pancreatic cancer cells, integrin α6β4 selectively associates and colocalizes with CD151 and Tspan8 and such coalescence is strengthened by protein kinase C (PKC) activation (19, 22).
CD151
CD151 expression is upregulated upon the progression and metastasis of various human solid malignant tumors such as breast, prostate, colon, liver, pancreas, and gum cancers, compared with that in corresponding normal tissues (6, 24–30). In general, higher CD151 expression correlates with a worse prognosis for cancer patients, i.e., lower survival and/or higher recurrence rates (6, 25–26, 28, 31–32).
In animal tumor models, CD151 promotes the distal metastasis of tumor by, at least, enhancing tumor cell intravasation (33) and tumor vascularization (6). CD151 monoclonal antibodies block the lung metastasis of epidermoid carcinoma, fibroblastoma, and colon adenocarcinoma in mice (34–35), while CD151 silencing reduces the lung metastasis of breast cancer in an experimental metastasis mouse model (36). In addition, CD151 silencing or overexpression significantly affects primary tumor growth in animals (6, 27–28). Notably, CD151 silencing sensitizes breast cancer cells to the ErbB2 antagonist treatment (37).
Direct enhancement of tumor cell movement appears to be the cellular mechanism for CD151 to promote tumor metastasis. In vitro, the overexpression of CD151 promotes tumor cell migration and invasion while the knockdown of CD151 usually inhibits them (27–28, 32, 35, 38–40). In vivo, a CD151 monoclonal antibody that blocks tumor metastasis inhibits the movement of tumor cells away from the primary tumor mass by attenuating the rear detachment from matrix of the invading tumor cells (33). Recent studies underline that CD151 expression in tumors correlates with the degree of tumor neovascularization and ability of tumor cells to induce angiogenesis (6, 32), implying that angiogenesis is involved in the prometastatic activity of CD151.
CD151 facilitates or stabilizes tumor cell-cell adhesion and strengthens tumor cell-laminin adhesion (38, 40–43). In addition, CD151 upregulates growth factor-induced signaling in tumor cells. CD151 expression is functionally associated with HGF/c-Met signaling in breast, liver, and salivary gland cancers (28, 39); and CD151 silencing specifically attenuates TGFβ1-induced p38 MAP kinase activation in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (36). Moreover, CD151 enhances the pericellular proteolysis of tumor cells through association and activation of MMP7 and upregulation of MMP9 expression (28, 32, 35, 44). CD151-dependent pericellular proteolysis and -facilitated signaling likely contribute to its mediated promotion of tumor progression. However, it is unclear how CD151-dependent strengthening of cell-cell and cell-ECM adhesions leads to more progressive tumors. Presumably proper tumor cell-cell adhesion could accelerate collective movement of tumor cells when they depart from the primary tumor as a cohort or enhanced tumor cell adhesiveness facilitates the homing of metastatic tumor cells to the target tissue. It is also unclear how CD151-enhanced pericellular proteolysis reconciles with its reinforcement roles in cell adhesions.
Tumor progression-suppressing tetraspanins
CD9
CD9 is considered to function primarily as a progression and metastasis suppressor in solid tumors (5). Clinical and pathologic findings indicate that downregulation of CD9 correlates with the progression of malignant tumors from lung, breast, colon, skin, ovary, uterus, stomach, oral cavity, head and neck, prostate, pancrease, and several other organs and tissues (45–58). CD9 expression was also reported to correlate inversely with the progression of several hematopoietic malignancies (59–61). Reduced expression of CD9 is commonly observed in metastatic lesions compared with primary tumor, and patients with tumors lacking CD9 are typically at advanced stages. Although the prognostic importance of CD9 in the survival of tumor patients has not always been conclusive, most studies support the idea that CD9 expression in tumors correlates with better overall and/or disease-free survival rates, longer disease-free interval, and/or low recurrence rate (25, 49, 52, 55, 57, 62–66). In contrast, two studies on gastric cancer suggest that higher CD9 expression appears to be associated with more progressive tumors and poorer prognosis (67–68).
Studies with CD9 overexpression, silencing, and antibody treatment using spontaneous metastasis assay in orthotopic or ectopic tumor implantation models emphasize that CD9 suppresses the local lymph node and/or distal organ metastasis of various solid tumors in mouse (69–73). Because CD9 inhibits cell motility such as migration and invasion of neoplastic cell lines from lung, breast, skin, gastric, pancreatic, and bladder tumors in vitro (24, 69, 74–76), CD9 likely renders tumor cells more static in vivo, leading to the suppression of tumor metastasis. However, it was also reported that CD9 expression positively correlates with cell motility in some tumor cells. For example, the overexpression of CD9 in B16F1 and SbCl2 melanoma cell lines had increased capability to invade Matrigel (77), and CD9 silencing in MCF7 breast cancer cells reduces invasiveness (78). Such discrepancy reflects the complexity of CD9 function and may result from different lipid compositions such as GM3 content in the plasma membrane of different tumor cells (74, 76). In addition, CD9 may regulate tumor-endothelial cell interaction and tumor lymphangiogenesis because of its presence in lymphatic vessels (55–56, 79). Interestingly, the cell surface CD9 proteins reduce platelet aggregation activity and lung retention of HT1080 fibroblastoma cells by associating with podoplannin, a metastasis-promoting and platelet aggregation-inducing factor (80). CD9-podoplannin complex neutralizes podoplannin-mediated platelet aggregation, which facilitates the arrest of tumor cell emboli in the microcirculation and prevents tumor cells from immune assault in the circulation. Another observation related to immune assault is that CD9 overexpression sensitizes myeloma cells to the lysis mediated by interleukin 2-activated T and NK cells (81). Finally, the attenuated proliferation and survival of tumor cells could partially contribute to CD9-mediated suppression of tumor progression (73, 77, 82–84).
How CD9 inhibits tumor cell motility is not firmly established. The mechanistic analyses have focused on integrin-mediated cell-ECM adhesion based on knowledge of the CD9-integrin complex. But CD9 appears to regulate both cell-cell and -ECM adhesions, as well as adhesion-dependent cytoskeletal reorganization and cellular morphological changes (79, 83, 85–87). Also, CD9-containing TEMs associate and colocalize with MT1-MMP and modulate the proteolytic activities of MT1-MMP, MMP-2, and MMP-9 (78, 82, 85, 88). The reported effects of CD9 on cell adhesion and MMP activity, however, are diverse as the effect of CD9 on cell motility, and further clarifications are needed. Studies on CD9 signaling have provided additional or alternative insights into the mechanisms. For example, CD9 potentiates the juxtacrine activities of proHB-EGF and transmembrane TGFα but specifically attenuates EGFR signaling through the downregulation of surface expression of EGFR (53, 89, 90), suggesting that CD9 alters growth factor signaling in tumor cells. CD9-containing TEMs also alter PI3K/Akt and Wnt signaling (82, 85, 87). The conclusions from these signaling studies are consistent with the observations that CD9 affects not only cell motility but also cell survival and proliferation. In summary, it is relatively clear that CD9 suppresses cancer progression, but more studies are required to appreciate how CD9 expression and signaling contributes to the cancer phenotype.
CD63
The expression of CD63 is downregulated upon the progression of melanoma, ovarian tumor, and lung adenocarcinoma in some studies (91–94) but does not correlate with the progression of tumors from prostate, lung, thyroid, and pancreas in other studies (49, 95–97). Nevertheless, the subcutaneous injection of CD63-overexpressing melanoma cells into nude mice led to the decreased rate of tumor growth while the intravenous injection had the reduced numbers of peritoneal and subcutaneous metastases (98). Up- or downregulating cellular expression of CD63 in vitro revealed that CD63 inhibits tumor cell migration and invasion, reduces matrix degradation, and alters cell-matrix adhesion (99–100). Besides interacting with TEM, CD63 reduces MT1-MMP expression by driving MT1-MMP to lysosomes for degradation (101) and binds to TIMP-1, an inhibitor of MMPs, on the cell surface (102). Consistently, decreased CD63 expression leads to increased activity of MMP2 and MMP9 (100).
CD82
CD82 is widely expressed in epithelial tissues, but its expression is often reduced or lost upon tumor progression (103–108). CD82 level is inversely correlated with patient prognosis in a variety of solid tumors such as prostate, breast, colorectal, pancreatic, bladder, lung, oral, gastric, liver, esophageal, penile, and endometrial cancers (103, 109–115). Notably, in breast cancer, CD82 expression is preferentially lost in estrogen receptor-positive tumors but constantly found in the primary and metastatic lesions of estrogen receptor-negative ones (116–118)
In animal models, CD82 inhibits tumor metastasis, in the majority of reports, without affecting the proliferation of primary tumors (103–104, 106–107, 109, 111–113). The forced expression of CD82 in prostate, breast, and liver cancer cells, as well as melanoma and fibroblatoma cells, significantly suppressed metastasis in spontaneous and/or experimental metastasis assays (103, 111, 119–121). Direct administration of CD82-expressing viruses into pancreatic or lung cancer also suppressed metastasis in orthotopic tumor animal models (72, 122).
At the cellular level, CD82 directly inhibits tumor cell migration and/or invasion (106). In migrating cells, CD82 inhibits both protrusive and retraction cellular processes by deregulating actin organization (our unpublished data). CD82 also indirectly inhibits cell motility by elevating cell-cell adhesion (112). Recently, CD82 was found to directly bind to Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) on endothelium at the intravasation step, thereby leading to the growth arrest and senescence of CD82-positive tumor cells. In contrast, CD82-negative tumor cells entered the circulation and subsequently established metastasis (123).
At the molecular level, CD82 alters the functions or activities of membrane molecules such as integrins, EGFR, c-Met, and uPAR, some of which associate with CD82 in TEMs, by modulating either their trafficking or membrane compartmentalization (124–127). Such effects likely result from the specific interaction of CD82 with membrane lipids such as GM2 and CD82-induced alteration of membrane lipid composition (128–130). Consequently, the downstream signaling derived from these membrane molecules such as src, p130CAS/Crk, and Rho small GTPases are subsequently downregulated or deregulated by CD82 (126, 131–132) and lead to the perturbation of cytoskeletal rearrangements that are required for cell motility. It was also reported that CD82 expression reduced MMP9 enzymatic activity and increased TIMP1 level (133).
Concluding remarks
Being localized at cell-cell and -matrix contacts and associated with cell adhesion molecules such as IgSF proteins and integrins, tetraspanins regulate cell-cell and -matrix adhesion. Lines of evidence support the assumption that tetraspanins also modify growth factor signaling. Because cell adhesion molecules and growth factors directly regulate cell motility, tetraspanins basically modulate most motogenic signaling activities at or from the cell membrane. One emerging theme is that tetraspanins take an active part in membrane trafficking such as endocytosis and exocytosis (134). Another emerging theme is that tetraspanins are associated with the proteolysis at or near the plasma membrane by modulating the activities of various proteases such as MMP, MT1-MMP, ADAM, and γ-secretase (14, 135–137). Both themes provide additional dimensions of regulatory mechanisms for cell-cell adhesion, cell-matrix adhesion, and growth factor signaling. Based on their functional relationship with cell membrane, we postulate that, at the molecular level, tetraspanins are organizers for membrane proteins and lipids. Also, the signaling events associated with pro- or antitumor progression activity of a given tetraspanin are typically multifarious, implying that tetraspanins affect the global functions of, and at, the cell membrane.
At the cellular level, tetraspanins typically regulate tumor cell movement by altering cell-cell and -matrix interactions. Hence, whether epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) or mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) is involved becomes an interesting question. It was reported that tetraspanin TM4SF5 promoted liver tumorigenesis through EMT (138). CD151, however, strengthened cell-cell adhesion despite enhancing tumor cell movement. Also, the genetic ablations of several tetraspanins that regulate tumor progression did not reveal altered EMT or MET during animal development though genetic compensation may exist. Hence, if EMT and/or MET are involved, they may not be the canonical ones, but they do deserve further study.
The functional difference between tetraspanins in tumor progression may result from the compositional difference of TEMs. The difference in TEM constituents leads to diversity of TEMs in membrane properties such as signaling, cytoskeletal connection, and/or curvature and subsequent difference in function. For example, CD82 and CD151 likely sequester and associate different proteins and lipids to form distinct TEMs. In addition, different abilities and behaviors of tetraspanins in trafficking may also contribute to their functional differences. For example, CD82 and CD151 exhibit significant differences in trafficking kinetics, route, and destination (130, our unpublished data). Such diverse behaviors in trafficking could result in different destiny of their associated cell adhesion proteins, growth factor receptors, and proteases and subsequently lead to opposite functions.
Tetraspanins discussed herein are the ideal diagnostic, staging, and prognostic markers and promising therapeutic targets for tumor progression. For example, the interference of coordinated activities of protease-tetraspanin complex may be a constructive therapeutic approach to limit tumor invasion and metastasis. Besides either promoting or suppressing tumor progression, tetraspanins are typically the wide-spectrum modifiers for the progression of various solid tumors, suggesting that the element(s) determining the activities of tetraspanins toward tumor progression lies within tetraspanin molecules per se. Identifying the structural element(s) could be therapeutically beneficial. However, the analyses of 1) structural similarities between promoters such as CD151 and Tspan8 or between suppressors such as CD9 and CD82 and 2) structural differences between promoters and suppressors have so far not resulted in meaningful insight. Although the aforementioned tetraspanins are not crucial for cell survival or proliferation, they alter the growth of primary tumor in animal model (6, 27). A few studies noted that the expression of tetraspanins such as CD151 and Tspan8 desensitized tumor cells to chemotherapy or apoptosis (23, 37). The mechanism is unclear but is probably unrelated to their association with integrins, because tumor cells typically survive and proliferate well in an anchorage- or integrin-independent manner. Compared to cell movement, the effect of tetraspanins on tumor growth and survival appears to be less prominent but nevertheless provides another advantage therapeutically. Together, more molecular and cellular information on tetraspanins needs to be obtained and deeper mechanistic insight on the roles of tetrapsanins in tumor progression needs to be gained before clinical applications of tetraspanins can be realized. Thus, in addition to delineating the mechanisms at the molecular, cellular, and organism levels and assessing the roles of “novel” tetraspanins in tumor progression, future studies should further explore the possibility of tetraspanins as diagnostic, staging, and prognostic markers and therapeutic targets for tumor progression.
Acknowledgement
Because of the limited numbers of reference, we could not cite many original research articles. We apologize to the authors of these publications. We thank Dr. David Armbruster for critically reading the manuscript.
Grant Support
This work was supported by American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid to L. K. Jennings and National Institutes of Health Grant CA096991 and American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid 0855307E to X. A. Zhang.
Abbreviations:
- DARC
Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines
- ECM
extracellular matrix
- EMT
epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- KO
knock out
- MET
mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition
- MMP
matrix metalloproteinase
- PI-3K
phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase
- PI-4K
phosphatidylinositol-4 kinase
- PKC
protein kinase C
- TEM
tetraspanin-enriched microdomain
- UPA
urokinase plasminogen activator
- VEGF
vascular endothelial growth factor
Footnotes
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
None.
References
- 1.Hemler ME, Mannion BA, Berditchevski F. (1996) Association of TM4SF proteins with integrins: relevance to cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1287:67–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Boucheix C, Duc GH, Jasmin C et al. (2001) Tetraspanins and malignancy. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2001:1–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wright MD, Moseley GW, van Spriel AB (2004) Tetraspanin microdomains in immune cell signalling and malignant disease. Tissue Antigens 64:533–42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lazo PA (2007) Functional implications of tetraspanin proteins in cancer biology. Cancer Sci 98:1666–77 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zöller M (2009) Tetraspanins: push and pull in suppressing and promoting metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 9:40–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sadej R, Romanska H, Baldwin G et al. (2009) CD151 regulates tumorigenesis by modulating the communication between tumor cells and endothelium. Mol Cancer Res 7:787–98 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gesierich S, Berezovskiy I, Ryschich E et al. (2006) Systemic Induction of the angiogenesis switch by the tetraspanin D6.1A/CO-029. Cancer Res 66(14): 7083–7094 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nazarenko I, Rana S, Baumann A et al. (2010) Cell surface tetraspanin Tspan8 contributes to molecular pathways of exosome-induced endothelial cell activation. Cancer Res 70:1668–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Boucheix C, Rubinstein E. (2001) Tetraspanins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 58:1189–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hakomori SI. (2002) Inaugural Article: The glycosynapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 99:225–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Levy S, Shoham T. (2005) Protein-protein interactions in the tetraspanin web. Physiology. 20:218–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hemler ME (2005) Tetraspanin functions and associated microdomains. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6:801–811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Charrin S, le Naour F, Silvie O et al. (2009) Lateral organization of membrane proteins: tetraspanins spin their web. Biochem J 420:133–54 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yáñez-Mó M, Barreiro O, Gordon-Alonso M et al. (2009) Tetraspanin-enriched microdomains: a functional unit in cell plasma membranes. Trends Cell Biol 19:434–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Szala S, Kasai Y, Steplewski Z et al. (1990) Molecular cloning of cDNA for the human tumor-assocaited antigen CO-029 and identification of the related transmembrane antigens. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87:6833–6837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Claas C, Seiter S, Claas A et al. (1998) Association Between the Rat Homologue of CO-029, a Metastasis-associated Tetraspanin Molecule and Consumption Coagulopathy. J Cell Biol 141:297–280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kanetaka K, Sakamoto M, Yamamoto Y et al. (2001) Overexpression of tetraspanin CO-029 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Hepatology 35:637–642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Le Naour F, André M, Greco C, Billard M et al. (2006) Profiling of the tetraspanin web of human colon cancer cells. Mol and Cell Proteomics 5.5845–857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gesierich S, Paret C, Hildebrand D, et al. (2005). Colocalization of the tetraspanins, CO-029 and CD151, with Integrins in Human Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Impact on cell motility. Clin Cancer Res 11(8): 2840–2852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zhou Z, Ran YL, Hu H et al. (2008) TM4SF3 promotes esophageal carcinoma metastasis via upregulating ADAM12m expression. Clin Exp Metastasis 25(5):537–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kanetaka K, Sakamoto M, Yamamoto Y et al. (2003) Possible involvement of tetraspanin CO-029 in hematogenous intrahepatic metastasis of liver cancer cells. J Gastroenterol Hepato 18(11):1309–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Claas C, Wahl J, Orlicky DJ et al. (2005) The tetraspanin D6.1A and its molecular partners on rat carcinoma cells. Biochem J 389: 99–110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kuhn S, Koch M, Nübel T et al. (2007) A complex of EpCAM, claudin-7, CD44 variant isoforms, and tetraspanins promotes colorectal cancer progression. Mol Cancer Res 5:553–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sauer G, Kurzeder C, Grundmann R et al. (2003) Expression of tetraspanin adaptor proteins below defined threshold values is associated with in vitro invasiveness of mammary carcinoma cells. Oncol Rep 10(2):405–10 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hashida H, Takabayashi A, Tokuhara T et al. (2003) Clinical significance of transmembrane 4 superfamily in colon cancer. Br J Cancer 89:158–67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ang J, Lijovic M, Ashman LK et al. (2004) CD151 protein expression predicts the clinical outcome of low-grade primary prostate cancer better than histologic grading: a new prognostic indicator? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11:1717–21 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yang XH, Richardson AL, Torres-Arzayus MI et al. (2008) CD151 accelerates breast cancer by regulating alpha 6 integrin function, signaling, and molecular organization. Cancer Res 68:3204–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ke AW, Shi GM, Zhou J, et al. (2009) Role of overexpression of CD151 and/or c-Met in predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 49:491–503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hirano C, Nagata M, Noman AA et al. (2009) Tetraspanin gene expression levels as potential biomarkers for malignancy of gingival squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Cancer 124(12):2911–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Novitskaya V, Romanska H, Dawoud M et al. (2010) Tetraspanin CD151 regulates growth of mammary epithelial cells in three-dimensional extracellular matrix: implication for mammary ductal carcinoma in situ. Cancer Res 70:4698–708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tokuhara T, Hasegawa H, Hattori N et al. (2001) Clinical significance of CD151 gene expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7:4109–14 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shi GM, Ke AW, Zhou J et al. (2010) CD151 modulates expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 and promotes neoangiogenesis and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 52:183–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zijlstra A, Lewis J, Degryse B et al. (2008) The inhibition of tumor cell intravasation and subsequent metastasis via regulation of in vivo tumor cell motility by the tetraspanin CD151 Cancer Cell 13:221–34 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Testa JE, Brooks PC, Lin JM et al. (1999) Eukaryotic expression cloning with an antimetastatic monoclonal antibody identifies a tetraspanin (PETA-3/CD151) as an effector of human tumor cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res 59:3812–20 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kohno M, Hasegawa H, Miyake M et al. (2002) CD151 enhances cell motility and metastasis of cancer cells in the presence of focal adhesion kinase. Int J Cancer 97:336–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sadej R, Romanska H, Kavanagh D et al. (2010) Tetraspanin CD151 regulates transforming growth factor beta signaling: implication in tumor metastasis. Cancer Res 70:6059–70 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yang XH, Flores LM, Li Q et al. (2010) Disruption of Laminin-Integrin-CD151-Focal Adhesion Kinase Axis Sensitizes Breast Cancer Cells to ErbB2 Antagonists. Cancer Res 70:2256–63 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hong IK, Jin YJ, Byun HJ, Jeoung DI, Kim YM, Lee H. Homophilic interactions of Tetraspanin CD151 up-regulate motility and matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression of human melanoma cells through adhesion-dependent c-Jun activation signaling pathways. J Biol Chem. 2006. 281:24279–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Klosek SK, Nakashiro K, Hara S et al. (2005) CD151 forms a functional complex with c-Met in human salivary gland cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 336(2):408–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Winterwood NE, Varzavand A, Meland MN et al. (2006) A critical role for tetraspanin CD151 in alpha3beta1 and alpha6beta4 integrin-dependent tumor cell functions on laminin-5. Mol Biol Cell 17:2707–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shigeta M, Sanzen N, Ozawa M et al. (2003) CD151 regulates epithelial cell-cell adhesion through PKC- and Cdc42-dependent actin cytoskeletal reorganization. J Cell Biol 163(1):165–76 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nishiuchi R, Sanzen N, Nada S et al. (2005) Potentiation of the ligand-binding activity of integrin alpha3beta1 via association with tetraspanin CD151. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(6):1939–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Johnson JL, Winterwood N, DeMali KA et al. (2009) Tetraspanin CD151 regulates RhoA activation and the dynamic stability of carcinoma cell-cell contacts. J Cell Sci 122:2263–73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hasegawa M, Furuya M, Kasuya Y et al. (2007) CD151 dynamics in carcinoma-stroma interaction: integrin expression, adhesion strength and proteolytic activity. Lab Invest 87(9):882–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Si Z, Hersey P (1993) Expression of the neuroglandular antigen and analogues in melanoma. CD9 expression appears inversely related to metastatic potential of melanoma. Int J Cancer 54(1):37–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Miyake M, Nakano K, Leki Y et al. (1995) Motility related protein 1 (MRP-1/CD9) expression: inverse correlation with metastases in breast cancer. Cancer Res 55(18):4127–31 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Cajot JF, Sordat I, Silvestre T et al. (1997). Differential display cloning identifies motility-related protein (MRP1/CD9) as highly expressed in primary compared to metastatic human colon carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 57(13):2593–7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mori M, Mimori K, Shiraishi T et al. (1998). Motility related protein 1 (MRP1/CD9) expression in colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res 4(6):1507–10 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sho M, Adachi M, Taki T et al. (1998). Transmembrane 4 superfamily as a prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer. Int J Cancer 79(5):509–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Uchida S, Shimada Y, Watanabe G et al. (1999) Motility-related protein (MRP-1/CD9) and KAI1/CD82 expression inversely correlate with lymph node metastasis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 79(7-8):1168–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Kusukawa J, Ryu F, Kameyama T et al. (2001). Reduced expression of CD9 in oral squamous cell carcinoma: CD9 expression inversely related to high prevalence of lymph node metastasis. J Oral Pathol Med 30(2):73–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Miyamoto S, Maruyama A, Okugawa K et al. (2001) Loss of motility-related protein 1 (MRP1/CD9) and integrin alpha3 expression in endometrial cancers. Cancer 92(3):542–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Murayama Y, Miyagawa J, Shinomura Y et al. (2002) Significance of the association between heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and CD9 in human gastric cancer. Int J Cancer 98(4):505–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Houle CD, Ding XY, Foley JF et al. (2002) Loss of expression and altered localization of KAI1 and CD9 protein are associated with epithelial ovarian cancer progression. Gynecol Oncol 86(1):69–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Erovic BM, Pammer J, Hollemann D et al. (2003) Motility-related protein-1/CD9 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 25(10):848–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Sauer G, Windisch J, Kurzeder C et al. (2003). Progression of cervical carcinomas is associated with down-regulation of CD9 but strong local re-expression at sites of transendothelial invasion. Clin Cancer Res 9(17):6426–31 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Mhawech P, Herrmann F, Coassin M et al. (2003) Motility-related protein 1 (MRP-1/CD9) expression in urothelial bladder carcinoma and its relation to tumor recurrence and progression. Cancer 98(8):1649–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang JC, Bégin LR, Bérubé NG et al. (2007) Down-regulation of CD9 expression during prostate carcinoma progression is associated with CD9 mRNA modifications. Clin Cancer Res 13(8):2354–61 Epub 2007 Apr 3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Yau JC, Dabbagh LK, Formenti KS et al. (1998) Expression of transmembrane 4 superfamily member, CD9, is related to improved progression-free survival in patients with diffuse non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncol Rep 5(6):1507–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.De Bruyne E, Bos TJ, Asosingh K et al. (2008) Epigenetic silencing of the tetraspanin CD9 during disease progression in multiple myeloma cells and correlation with survival. Clin Cancer Res 14(10):2918–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yoon SO, Zhang X, Freedman AS et al. (2010) Down-regulation of CD9 expression and its correlation to tumor progression in B lymphomas. Am J Pathol 177(1):377–86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Higashiyama M, Taki T, Ieki Y et al. (1995) Reduced motility related protein-1 (MRP-1/CD9) gene expression as a factor of poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 55(24):6040–4 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Miyake M, Nakano K, Itoi SI et al. (1996) Motility-related protein-1 (MRP-1/CD9) reduction as a factor of poor prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Res 56(6):1244–9 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Miyake M, Adachi M, Huang C et al. (1999) A novel molecular staging protocol for non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene 18(14):2397–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mhawech P, Dulguerov P, Tschanz E et al. (2004). Motility-related protein-1 (MRP-1/CD9) expression can predict disease-free survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Cancer 90(2):471–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Woegerbauer M, Thurnher D, Houben R et al. (2010) Expression of the tetraspanins CD9, CD37, CD63, and CD151 in Merkel cell carcinoma: strong evidence for a posttranscriptional fine-tuning of CD9 gene expression. Mod Pathol 23(5):751–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Hori H, Yano S, Koufuji K et al. (2004) CD9 expression in gastric cancer and its significance. J Surg Res 117(2):208–15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Soyuer S, Soyuer I, Unal D et al. (2010). Prognostic significance of CD9 expression in locally advanced gastric cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Pathol Res Pract [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ikeyama S, Koyama M, Yamaoko M et al. (1993) Suppression of cell motility and metastasis by transfection with human motility-related protein (MRP-1/CD9) DNA. J Exp Med 177(5):1231–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Miyake M, Inufusa H, Adachi M et al. (2000) Suppression of pulmonary metastasis using adenovirally motility related protein-1 (MRP-1/CD9) gene delivery. Oncogene 19(46):5221–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zheng R, Yano S, Zhang H et al. (2005) CD9 overexpression suppressed the liver metastasis and malignant ascites via inhibition of proliferation and motility of small-cell lung cancer cells in NK cell-depleted SCID mice. Oncol Res 15(7-8):365–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Takeda T, Hattori N, Tokuhara T et al. (2007) Adenoviral transduction of MRP-1/CD9 and KAI1/CD82 inhibits lymph node metastasis in orthotopic lung cancer model. Cancer Res 67(4):1744–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Nakamoto T, Murayama Y, Oritani K et al. (2009) A novel therapeutic strategy with anti-CD9 antibody in gastric cancers. J Gastroenterol 44(9):889–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ono M, Handa K, Sonnino S et al. (2001) GM3 ganglioside inhibits CD9-facilitated haptotactic cell motility: coexpression of GM3 and CD9 is essential in the downregulation of tumor cell motility and malignancy. Biochemistry 40(21):6414–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Funakoshi T, Tachibana I, Hoshida Y et al. (2003) Expression of tetraspanins in human lung cancer cells: frequent downregulation of CD9 and its contribution to cell motility in small cell lung cancer. Oncogene 22(5):674–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mitsuzuka K, Handa K, Satoh M et al. (2005) A specific microdomain (“glycosynapse 3“) controls phenotypic conversion and reversion of bladder cancer cells through GM3-mediated interaction of alpha3beta1 integrin with CD9. J Biol Chem 280(42):35545–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Fan J, Zhu GZ, Niles RM (2010) Expression and function of CD9 in melanoma cells. Mol Carcinog 49(1):85–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Lafleur MA, Xu D, Hemler ME (2009) Tetraspanin proteins regulate membrane type-1 matrix metalloproteinase-dependent pericellular proteolysis. Mol Biol Cell 20(7):2030–40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Longo N, Yáñez-Mó M, Mittelbrunn M et al. (2001) Regulatory role of tetraspanin CD9 in tumor-endothelial cell interaction during transendothelial invasion of melanoma cells. Blood 98(13):3717–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Nakazawa Y, Sato S, Naito M et al. (2008) Tetraspanin family member CD9 inhibits Aggrus/podoplanin-induced platelet aggregation and suppresses pulmonary metastasis. Blood 112(5):1730–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Shallal S, Kornbluth J (2000) CD9 expression enhances the susceptibility of myeloma cell lines to cell-mediated cytolysis. Blood 96(1):224–33 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Saito Y, Tachibana I, Takeda Y et al. (2006) Absence of CD9 enhances adhesion-dependent morphologic differentiation, survival, and matrix metalloproteinase-2 production in small cell lung cancer cells. Cancer Res 66(19):9557–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ovalle S, Gutiérrez-López MD, Olmo N et al. (2007) The tetraspanin CD9 inhibits the proliferation and tumorigenicity of human colon carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 121(10):2140–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zvereff V, Wang JC, Shun K et al. (2007) Colocalisation of CD9 and mortalin in CD9-induced mitotic catastrophe in human prostate cancer cells. Br J Cancer 97(7):941–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Sugiura T, Berditchevski F (1999) Function of α3β1-tetraspanin protein complexes in tumor cell invasion. Evidence for the role of the complexes in production of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2). J Cell Biol 146:1375–89 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Furuya M, Kato H, Nishimura N et al. (2005) Down-regulation of CD9 in human ovarian carcinoma cell might contribute to peritoneal dissemination: morphologic alteration and reduced expression of beta1 integrin subsets. Cancer Res 65(7):2617–25 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Huang CL, Ueno M, Liu D et al. (2006) MRP-1/CD9 gene transduction regulates the actin cytoskeleton through the downregulation of WAVE2. Oncogene 25(49):6480–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hong IK, Kim YM, Jeoung DI et al. (2005) Tetraspanin CD9 induces MMP-2 expression by activating p38 MAPK, JNK and c-Jun pathways in human melanoma cells. Exp Mol Med 37(3):230–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Higashiyama S, Iwamoto R, Goishi K, et al. (1995). The membrane protein CD9/DRAP 27 potentiates the juxtacrine growth factor activity of the membrane-anchored heparin-binding EGF-like growth factor. J Cell Biol. 128(5):929–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Imhof I, Gasper WJ, Derynck R (2008). Association of tetraspanin CD9 with transmembrane TGFα confers alterations in cell surface presentation of TGFα and cytoskeletal organization. J. Cell Sci 121:2265–2274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Atkinson B, Ernst CS, Ghrist BF et al. (1985) Monoclonal antibody to a highly glycosylated protein reacts in fixed tissue with melanoma and other tumors. Hybridoma 4:243–55 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Kondoh M, Ueda M, Ichihashi M et al. (1993) Decreased expression of human melanoma-associated antigen ME491 along the progression of melanoma pre-canceroses to invasive and metastatic melanomas. Melanoma Res 3:241–245 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Zhijun X, Shulan Z, Zhuo Z et al. (2007) Expression and significance of the protein and mRNA of metastasis suppressor gene ME491/CD63 and integrin alpha5 in ovarian cancer tissues. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 28:179–183 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Kwon MS, Shin SH, Yim SH et al. (2007) CD63 as a biomarker for predicting the clinical outcomes in adenocarcinoma of lung. Lung Cancer 57:46–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Adachi M, Taki T, Higashiyama M et al. (2000) Significance of integrin alpha5 gene expression as a prognostic factor in node-negative non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 6:96–101 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Liu AY, Roudier MP, True LD (2004) Heterogeneity in primary and metastatic prostate cancer as defined by cell surface CD profile. Am J Pathol 165(5):1543–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chen Z, Mustafa T, Trojanowicz B et al. (2004) CD82, and CD63 in thyroid cancer. Int J Mol Med 14:517–527 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Radford KJ, Mallesch J, Hershey P (1995) Suppression of human melanoma cell growth and metastasis by the melanoma-associated antigen CD63 (ME491) Int J Cancer 62:631–635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Radford KJ, Thorne RF, Hersey P (1997) Regulation of tumor cell motility and migration by CD63 in a human melanoma cell line. J Immunol 158:3353–3358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Jang HI, Lee H (2003) A decrease in the expression of CD63 tetraspanin protein elevates invasive potential of human melanoma cells. Exp Mol Med 35:317–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Takino T, Miyamori H, Kawaguchi N et al. (2003) Tetraspanin CD63 promotes targeting and lysosomal proteolysis of membrane-type 1 matrix metalloproteinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 304:160–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Jung KK, Liu XW, Chirco R et al. (2006) Identification of CD63 as a tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 interacting cell surface protein. EMBO Journal 25:3934–3942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Dong JT, Lamb PW, Rinker-Schaeffer CW et al. (1995) KAI1, a metastasis suppressor gene for prostate cancer on human chromosome 11p11.2. Science 268:884–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Tonoli H, Barrett C (2005) CD82 metastasis suppressor gene: a potential target for new therapeutics? Trends Mol Med 11: 563–570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Jackson P, Marreiros A, Russell PJ (2005) KAI1 tetraspanin and metastasis suppressor. Int. J Biochem Cell Biol 37:530–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Liu WM, Zhang XA (2006) KAI/CD82, a tumor metastasis suppressor. Cancer Letters 240:183–194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Miranti C (2009) Controlling cell surface dynamics and signaling: How CD82/KAI1 suppresses metastasis. Cellular Signaling 21: 196–211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Malik FA, Sanders AJ, Jiang WG (2009) KAI-1/CD82, the molecule and clinical implication in cancer and cancer metastasis. Histol Histopathol 24:519–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Adachi M, Taki T, Ieki Y et al. (1996) Correlation of KAI1/CD82 gene expression with good prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Research 56:1751–1755 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Dong JT, Lamb PW, Rinker-Schaeffer CW, Vukanovic J, Ichikawa T, Issacs JT, Barrett JC. Genomic Organization of the human KAI1 metastasis-suppressor gene. Genomics 1997; 41: 25–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Yang X, Wei LL, Tang C et al. (2001) Overexpression of KAI1 suppresses in vitro invasiveness and in vitro metastasis in breast cancer cells. Cancer Research 61:5284–5288 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Abe M, Sugiura T, Takahashi M et al. (2008) A novel function of CD82/KAI1 on E-cadherin-mediated homophillic cellular adhesion of cancer cells. Cancer Letters 266:163–170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Protzel C, Kakies C, Kleist B et al. (2008) Down regulation of the metastasis suppressor protein KAI1/CD82 correlates with occurrence of metastasis, prognosis and presence of HPV DNA in human penile squamous cell carcinoma. Virchows Arch 452:369–375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Ruseva Z, Geiger PX, Hutzler P et al. (2009) Tumor suppressor KAI1 affects integrin alphavbeta3-mediated ovarian cancer cell adhesion, motility, and proliferation. Exp Cell Res 315(10):1759–1771 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Choi U, Jee B, Lim Y, Lee K (2009) KAI1/CD82 decreases Rac1 expression and cell proliferation through PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in H1299 lung carcinoma cells. Cell Biochem Funct 27:40–47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Huang H, Groth J, Sossey-Alaoui K et al. (2005) Aberrant expression of novel and previously described cell membrane markers in human breast cancer cell lines and tumors. Clin Cancer Res 11(12):4357–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Christgen M, Bruchhardt H, Ballmaier M et al. (2008) KAI1/CD82 is a novel target of estrogen receptor-mediated gene repression and downregulated in primary human breast cancer. Int J Cancer 123(10):2239–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Christgen M, Christgen H, Heil C et al. (2009) Expression of KAI1/CD82 in distant metastases from estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Cancer Sci 100(9):1767–71 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Takaoka A, Hinoda Y, Sato S et al. (1998) Reduced invasive and metastatic potentials of KAI1-transfected melanoma cells. Jpn J Cancer Res 89:397–404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Yang JM, Peng ZH, Si SH et al. (2008) KAI1 gene suppresses invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma MHCC97-H cells in vitro and in animal models. Liver Int 28(1):132–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Bari R, Zhang YH, Zhang F et al. (2009) Transmembrane interactions are needed for KAI1/CD82-mediated suppression of cancer invasion and metastasis. Am J Pathol 174(2):647–60 Epub 2008 Dec 30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Xu JH, Guo XZ, Ren LN et al. (2008) KAI1 is a potential target for anti-metastasis in pancreatic cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol 14(7):1126–32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Bandyopadhyay S, Zhan R, Chaudhuri A et al. (2006) Interaction of KAI1 on tumor cells with DARC on vascular endothelium leads to metastasis suppression. Nat Med 12:933–938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.He B, Liu L, Cook GA, Grgurevich S, Jennings LK, Zhang XA. Tetraspanin CD82 attenuates cellular morphogenesis through down regulating integrin alpha-6 mediated cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2005; 280(5): 3346–3354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Odintsova E, Sugiura T, Berditchevski, F. Attenuation of EGF receptor signaling by a metastasis suppressor, the tetraspanin CD82/KAI-1. Curr Biol 2000; 10: 1009–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Sridhar SC, Miranti CK. (2006). Tetraspanin KAI1/CD82 suppresses invasion by inhibiting integrin-dependent crosstalk with c-Met receptor and Src kinases. Oncogene. 25(16):2367–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Bass R, Werner F, Odintsova E, Sugiura T, Berditchevski F, Ellis V. (2005). Regulation of urokinase receptor proteolytic function by the tetraspanin CD82. J Biol Chem. 280(15):14811–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Odintsova E, Butters T, Monti E et al. (2006) Gangliosides play an important role in the organization of CD82-enriched microdomains. Biochem J 400:315–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Todeschini AR, Dos Santos JN, Handa K et al. (2007) Ganglioside GM2/ tetraspanin CD82 complex inhibits Met activation, and its cross-talk with integrins: Basis for control of cell motility through glycosynapse. J Biol Chem 282:8123–33 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Xu C, Zhang YH, Thangavel M, Richardson MM et al. (2009) CD82 endocytosis and cholesterol-dependent reorganization of tetraspanin webs and lipid rafts. FASEB J 10:3273–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Zhang X, He B, Zhou B, et al. (2003). Requirement of the p130CAS-Crk coupling for metastasis suppressor KAI1/CD82-mediated inhibition of cell migration. J Biol Chem 278:27319–27328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Takahashi M, Sugiura T, Abe M, et al. (2007) Regulation of c-MET signaling by the tetraspanin KAI-1/CD82 affects cancer cell migration. Int J Cancer 121: 1919–1929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Jee BK, Park KM, Surendran S et al. (2006) KAI1/CD82 suppresses tumor invasion by MMP9 inactivation via TIMP1 up-regulation in the H1299 human lung carcinoma cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 342:655–661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Berditchevski F,Odintsova E (2007) Tetraspanins as regulators of protein trafficking. Traffic 8:89–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Arduise C, Abache T, Li L et al. (2008) Tetraspanins regulate ADAM10-mediated cleavage of TNF-alpha and epidermal growth factor. J Immunol 181:7002–13 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Xu D, Sharma C, Hemler ME (2009) Tetraspanin12 regulates ADAM10-dependent cleavage of amyloid precursor protein. FASEB J 23:3674–81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Wakabayashi T, Craessaerts K, Bammens L et al. (2009) Analysis of the gamma-secretase interactome and validation of its association with tetraspanin-enriched microdomains. Nat Cell Biol 11:1340–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Lee SA, Lee SY, Cho IH, et al. (2008) Tetraspanin TM4SF5 mediates loss of contact inhibition through epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human hepatocarcinoma. J Clin Invest 118:1354–66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
