Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Mar 4;69(3):e70164. doi: 10.1111/myc.70164

Retrospective Epidemiological Analyses of 12,976 Culture‐Positive Superficial Fungal Infections in Shanghai, East China

Chunjiao Zheng 1, Wenjing He 1, Jingwen Tan 1, Xiaoping Liu 1, Yuanyuan Wang 1, Lulu Li 1, Linan Ni 1, Qian Yu 1,, Lianjuan Yang 1,
PMCID: PMC12958013  PMID: 41777220

ABSTRACT

Background

Superficial fungal infections (SFIs) are common dermatological conditions, and both domestic and international reports indicate an increasing incidence in recent years. Their prevalence is strongly affected by climate, temperature, humidity and lifestyle, resulting in significant regional variations.

Objective

To describe the epidemiological characteristics of superficial fungal infections in Shanghai, East China, from 2022 to 2024.

Methods

This single‐centre retrospective observational study was conducted at Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital. Clinical specimens, including skin scales, hair and nails, were examined using KOH microscopy, followed by culture on Sabouraud dextrose agar. Fungal identification was primarily based on colony morphology and microscopic features.

Results

A total of 12,976 cases of superficial fungal infections were recorded during the study period. Onychomycosis was the most common infection (33.75%), followed by tinea cruris (20.05%) and tinea pedis (18.63%). Significant gender differences were identified: females showed higher rates of onychomycosis and tinea pedis, while males more frequently presented with tinea cruris, tinea corporis and other SFIs. The highest number of infections occurred in individuals aged 31–40 years, with onychomycosis, tinea pedis and tinea versicolor being most prevalent in this group. Among culture‐positive samples, dermatophytes accounted for the majority (52.54%), with Trichophyton rubrum being the most frequently isolated species (44.27%). Dermatophyte infections were more common in males, whereas yeast infections were more frequent in females. Dermatophyte infections peaked in the 31–40 and 61–70 age groups, while yeast infections were most common among individuals aged 21–40.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable epidemiological insights into superficial fungal infections in Shanghai, offering necessary guidance for clinical diagnosis, treatment decision‐making and prevention strategies.

Keywords: Candida, dermatophytes, Malassezia, superficial fungal infections, tinea

1. Introduction

Superficial fungal infections (SFIs) represent a common dermatological issue, with recent studies reporting a continuous increase in their incidence [1, 2, 3, 4]. Their occurrence is strongly influenced by climatic factors, particularly temperature, humidity and lifestyle habits, resulting in significant regional differences [2, 5, 6, 7]. The primary causative agents include dermatophytes, yeasts and moulds.

In China, most existing epidemiological research has focused on specific fungal diseases, and comprehensive data on the overall epidemiology of dermatophytosis remain limited. Shanghai was selected as the study site for three key reasons that highlight its unique epidemiological relevance. First, the city has a subtropical monsoon climate marked by high humidity, hot, rainy summers and clear seasonal fluctuations. Second, the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, the largest specialised dermatological institution in East China, serves as a major referral centre with more than one million outpatient visits annually. Its patient population is diverse, drawn not only from Shanghai but also from surrounding provinces such as Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Anhui. Third, despite rapid urbanisation and lifestyle changes that may influence SFIs' distribution, recent large‐scale epidemiological data for Shanghai remain insufficient.

To address this gap, this study collected skin, hair and nail specimens from patients diagnosed with superficial fungal infections between January 2022 and September 2024. These samples were subjected to microscopic examination and fungal culture, followed by statistical analysis. This represents the first study to systematically assess the spectrum and clinical types of superficial fungal infections in Shanghai, East China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area Characteristics

This study was conducted in Shanghai, a major metropolitan city in eastern China. The region experiences a subtropical monsoon climate characterised by high humidity, pronounced seasonal variations and frequent rainfall. Summer temperatures typically range from 28°C to 38°C (http://data.cma.cn/), creating a warm and moist environment favourable for fungal growth. Lifestyle factors such as high population density, increased indoor activity associated with urbanisation, and frequent use of shared public facilities (e.g., swimming pools and gyms) may further contribute to the spread of superficial fungal infections. Socioeconomic factors, including access to healthcare, educational levels and certain occupations (e.g., manual labourers at higher risk of dermatophyte exposure) may also influence infection patterns. These regional characteristics were taken into account when interpreting the epidemiological findings of superficial fungal infections.

2.2. Clinical Data

Data were collected from patients diagnosed with superficial fungal infections who visited the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital between January 2022 and September 2024, except for February, April and May 2022 due to COVID‐19 lockdowns. Patients with clinically suspected SFIs who underwent both microscopic examination and fungal culture were included. Cases with contaminated cultures or incomplete clinical information were excluded. This study was observational in design, and the protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital (Approval No. 2025–34).

2.3. Sample Collection and Identification Methods

Lesion samples were collected using sterilised blunt knives to scrape scales from the margins of affected areas. Nail material was obtained by scraping with a sterile scalpel. For hair infections, approximately 10 infected hairs were collected, and the surrounding follicular scales were scraped or compressed using tweezers. Samples were placed on glass slides, treated with a fluorescent stain, coverslipped and examined microscopically. Portions of each specimen were subsequently inoculated onto Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) containing chloramphenicol and incubated at 26°C for four weeks, with observations performed twice weekly.

Fungal identification was based on macroscopic colony characteristics, including morphology, pigmentation and growth appearance, as well as microscopic features. For detailed examination of mould structures, a sellotape touch preparation stained with lactophenol cotton blue was used. In cases of suspected pityriasis versicolor or folliculitis, skin scrapings showing the characteristic ‘spaghetti and meatballs’ pattern under 10% KOH were cultured on SDA slants overlaid with sterile olive oil and incubated at 30°C. These cultures were monitored daily for Malassezia growth. CHROMagar medium was also used when necessary to differentiate certain Candida species.

Dermatophyte differentiation, particularly among Trichophyton species, relied on macroconidia morphology and colony pigmentation. For non‐dermatophyte moulds, only organisms generally associated with superficial mycoses, especially nail infections, were identified, and their clinical significance was assessed using three criteria: (i) direct microscopy showing irregular, broad, tortuous septate hyphae; (ii) positive culture defined as pure growth of the same mould at all inoculation points and (iii) when possible, consistent isolation of the same organism from two separate specimens collected 2–3 weeks apart [8]. The identification process incorporated direct microscopic findings, colony morphology and the clinical relevance of isolated fungi. Furthermore, lesion type and patient symptoms were correlated with laboratory results to improve clinical interpretation.

2.4. Statistical Methods

Data analysis and visualisation were performed using SPSS 26.0. Categorical variables were presented as counts (n) and percentages (%), and gender differences were assessed using chi‐square tests. A p‐value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of Infection Types and Patient Demographics

During the study period, 32,390 patients were clinically suspected of having superficial fungal infections. Of these, 12,976 cases (40.06%) with positive microscopy and culture results were included in the analysis. The cohort comprised 7130 males and 5846 females, yielding a male‐to‐female ratio of 1.22:1. Patient ages ranged from under 1 year (recorded as 0) to 98 years, with a mean age of 45.37 ± 18.44 years. Nine types of superficial fungal infections were identified. Onychomycosis was the most prevalent (4380 cases, 33.75%), followed by tinea cruris (2602 cases, 20.05%), tinea pedis (2418 cases, 18.63%), tinea corporis (1261 cases, 9.72%), tinea manuum (813 cases, 6.27%), folliculitis (658 cases, 5.07%), tinea versicolor (520 cases, 4.01%), tinea faciei (274 cases, 2.11%) and tinea capitis (50 cases, 0.39%).

3.2. Comparison of Infection Types by Gender

Among females, onychomycosis was the most common infection, followed by tinea pedis and tinea cruris. In comparison, males most frequently presented with tinea cruris, followed by onychomycosis and tinea pedis. Onychomycosis and tinea pedis were more prevalent in females, whereas males showed higher rates of tinea cruris, tinea corporis, tinea manuum, folliculitis and tinea versicolor. These gender‐related differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). No significant gender differences were found for tinea faciei or tinea capitis (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Comparison of different infectious diseases by gender.

Disease Female n (%) Male n (%) χ 2 p
Onychomycosis 2582 (19.90) 1798 (13.86) 515.842 < 0.001
Tinea cruris 553 (4.26) 2049 (15.79) 744.683 < 0.001
Tinea pedis 1310 (10.10) 1108 (8.54) 99.949 < 0.001
Tinea corporis 516 (3.98) 745 (5.74) 9.635 0.002
Tinea manuum 309 (2.38) 504 (3.88) 17.390 < 0.001
Tinea faciei 112 (0.86) 162 (1.25) 1.972 0.160
Tinea capitis 29 (0.22) 21 (0.16) 3.399 0.065
Folliculitis 242 (1.86) 416 (3.21) 19.170 < 0.001
Tinea Versicolor 193 (1.49) 327 (2.52) 13.785 < 0.001
Total 7130 (54.95) 5846 (45.05)

3.3. Fungal Infection Rates in Various Age Groups

As illustrated in Figure 1, the highest number of infections occurred in the 31–40 age group (2773 cases), followed by the 61–70 age group (2271 cases). Infections were comparatively uncommon among individuals aged 10 years or younger and those aged 80 years or older. Onychomycosis, tinea pedis and tinea versicolor were most frequently observed in the 31–40 age group, whereas tinea cruris, tinea corporis, tinea manuum and tinea faciei were more common among individuals aged 61–70. Folliculitis was most prevalent in the 21–30 age group, while tinea capitis occurred most often in the youngest age group.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Superficial fungal infection distributions by patient age.

3.4. Pathogenic Fungal Distributions and Gender Differences

Among the 12,976 culture‐positive specimens, dermatophytes were the most frequently identified pathogens (6818 strains, 52.54%), followed by yeasts (3239 strains, 24.96%) and moulds (2919 strains, 22.50%). Fourteen pathogenic species were detected, including three classified as ‘others’ due to unidentified dermatophytes, yeasts or moulds. Trichophyton rubrum ( T. rubrum ) was the predominant species (5744 strains, 44.27%), while Trichophyton tonsurans (T. tonsurans) was the least common (4 strains, 0.03%). Among the yeasts, Candida was the most prevalent genus (1422 cases, 10.96%), with Candida albicans as the leading species. Only a minimal number of Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis were detected, and no Candida krusei was identified during the study period. Aspergillus was the most common mould (1187 strains, 9.15%) (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Species composition of pathogenic fungi and gender‐based comparative analysis.

Pathogenic fungi Count Percentage (%) Female n (%) Male n (%) χ 2 p
Dermatophytes 2848 (21.95) 3970 (30.59) 62.460 < 0.001
T. rubrum 5744 44.27 2257 (17.39) 3487 (26.87) 138.089 < 0.001
Other Trichophyton species 615 4.74 301 (2.32) 314 (2.42) 3.948 0.047
T. mentagrophytes 197 1.52 119 (0.92) 78 (0.60) 19.049 < 0.001
M. canis 190 1.46 145 (1.12) 45 (0.35) 76.132 < 0.001
E. floccosum 56 0.43 18 (0.14) 38 (0.29) 3.786 0.052
N. gypsea 6 0.05 4 (0.03) 2 (0.02) 0.419 0.256
T. violaceum 6 0.05 3 (0.02) 3 (0.02) 1.000 0.560
T. tonsurans 4 0.03 1 (0.01) 3 (0.02) 0.632 0.390
Yeasts 1466 (11.30) 1773 (13.66) 0.076 0.783
Candida 1422 10.96 684 (5.27) 738 (5.69) 5.994 0.014
Malassezia 1178 9.08 435 (3.35) 743 (5.73) 34.194 < 0.001
Other Yeasts 639 4.92 347 (2.67) 292 (2.25) 23.236 < 0.001
Moulds 1532 (11.81) 1387 (10.69) 84.018 < 0.001
Aspergillus 1187 9.15 634 (4.89) 553 (4.26) 36.882 < 0.001
Penicillium 834 6.43 437 (3.37) 397 (3.06) 19.427 < 0.001
Other filamentous moulds 898 6.92 461 (3.55) 437 (3.37) 15.389 < 0.001
Total 12,976 100 5846 7130

Gender‐based differences were evident in the distribution of pathogenic fungi. Males had higher rates of dermatophyte infections, whereas females showed higher rates of yeast infections. Males were more frequently infected with T. rubrum , Candida and Malassezia (p < 0.05), while females had a higher prevalence of Trichophyton mentagrophytes (T. mentagrophytes), Microsporum canis ( M. canis ) and moulds (p < 0.05). Infection rates of Epidermophyton floccosum (E. floccosum), Nannizzia gypsea (N. gypsea), Trichophyton violaceum ( T. violaceum ) and T. tonsurans did not differ significantly between genders (Table 2).

3.5. Associations Between Pathogenic Fungi and Patient Age

Dermatophyte infections were most common in individuals aged 31–40 and 61–70 years. T. rubrum , other dermatophytes and T. mentagrophytes were predominantly detected in the 31–40 age group, whereas M. canis occurred mainly in patients aged 30 years or younger. E. floccosum showed its highest prevalence among those aged 41–50 years. Yeast infections, including Malassezia spp., were most frequently observed in individuals aged 21–40, whereas Candida infections were more common in individuals aged 61–70. Mould infections were similarly concentrated in the 31–40 age range (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Distribution of pathogenic species based on patient age. No graphs were prepared for N. gypsea, T. violaceum or T. tonsurans due to the relatively limited case numbers.

3.6. Associations Between Infection Types and Pathogenic Fungi

As shown in Table 3, the most frequently detected pathogenic fungi were T. rubrum , Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., which were most closely associated with onychomycosis, tinea cruris and tinea pedis, respectively. M. canis was predominantly linked to tinea corporis, tinea manuum and tinea capitis. E. floccosum was mainly associated with tinea cruris and tinea pedis, while N. gypsea and T. violaceum were identified in cases of tinea corporis and tinea capitis. T. tonsurans was occasionally observed in tinea faciei, tinea corporis and tinea capitis. T. rubrum was the principal pathogen responsible for onychomycosis, tinea cruris, tinea pedis, tinea corporis, tinea manuum and tinea faciei, whereas M. canis was the leading cause of tinea capitis. Tinea versicolor and folliculitis were primarily attributed to Malassezia spp.

TABLE 3.

Relationship between various diseases and pathogenic fungi.

Pathogenic fungi Onychomycosis Tinea cruris Tinea pedis Tinea corporis Tinea manuum Tinea faciei Tinea capitis Folliculitis Tinea versicolor Total
Dermatophytes
T. rubrum 1562 1769 1142 744 378 143 6 0 0 5744
Other Trichophyton species 227 130 124 78 28 25 3 0 0 615
T. mentagrophytes 34 11 121 13 5 10 3 0 0 197
M. canis 1 8 1 127 3 21 29 0 0 190
E. floccosum 1 18 31 2 4 0 0 0 0 56
N. gypsea 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 0 0 6
T. violaceum 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 6
T. tonsurans 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 4
Yeasts
Candida 543 377 192 117 172 20 1 0 0 1422
Malassezia 0 0 0 0 0 0 658 520 1178
Other Yeasts 382 54 130 32 41 0 0 0 0 639
Moulds
Aspergillus 720 74 254 50 69 19 1 0 0 1187
Penicillium 443 71 209 34 61 15 1 0 0 834
Other filamentous moulds 467 88 214 58 52 19 0 0 0 898
Total 4380 2602 2418 1261 813 274 50 658 520 12,976

4. Discussion

The Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital is situated in a rapidly developing coastal region of eastern China, characterised by high population density, a substantial migrant worker presence and convenient transportation networks. As a result, the hospital receives patients from both Shanghai and neighbouring provinces. In this study, analysis of individuals clinically suspected of superficial fungal infections revealed a male‐to‐female ratio of 1.22:1. These results are in good agreement with previously reported studies [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. The most frequently diagnosed infections were onychomycosis, tinea cruris and tinea pedis, a pattern comparable to that reported in Hangzhou, Southeast China [11]. However, significant differences emerged when comparing data from other regions. Studies from Guangzhou, southern China, reported tinea cruris, tinea capitis and tinea pedis as the predominant infections [7]. Those from Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo identified tinea corporis, tinea capitis and tinea pedis as the most common [13]. In Cayenne, French Guiana, onychomycosis, tinea capitis and tinea pedis were the leading presentations [14]. In comparison, in Japan, tinea pedis, onychomycosis and tinea corporis were most prevalent. These variations highlight the influence of regional environmental, socioeconomic and demographic factors on the distribution of superficial fungal infections [15].

Gender‐specific differences in the incidence of superficial fungal infections were clearly observed. Tinea cruris, tinea corporis, tinea manuum, folliculitis and tinea versicolor were more frequently diagnosed in males, while onychomycosis was more common in females. These findings are consistent with previous domestic and international reports [7, 11, 16, 17]. The higher prevalence of certain fungal infections in males may be attributed to lifestyle and physiological factors [18, 19]. Elevated androgen levels can increase sebum secretion and perspiration, creating a slightly alkaline skin environment favourable for fungal growth. Similarly, men are more likely to engage in physical labour and outdoor activities, which heighten exposure to environmental fungi, and they may pay less attention to personal hygiene [20, 21, 22]. The greater incidence of onychomycosis and tinea pedis among females may relate to nail barrier damage from household chores, frequent nail treatments involving chemical agents and the use of poorly ventilated footwear, such as high heels and boots, that promotes sweating and moisture retention. Moreover, women may be more inclined to seek medical care due to heightened concern about cosmetic appearance [1, 11, 22, 23].

Age‐related differences in infection patterns were also evident. The highest incidences of onychomycosis, tinea pedis and tinea versicolor were observed in individuals aged 31–40 years, while folliculitis was most common in the 21–30 age group. Adults aged 21–40 represent the primary working population, characterised by active social interactions, increased perspiration and frequent exposure to environmental fungi. This age group also tends to demonstrate strong physiological activity, including elevated hormone and sebum production, which creates a skin microenvironment conducive to fungal growth. Shanghai's subtropical monsoon climate further promotes fungal proliferation, and the city's economic development and extensive population mobility may contribute to the higher susceptibility of younger individuals to various infections, including those caused by Malassezia spp. In comparison, individuals aged 61–70 years showed increased rates of tinea cruris, tinea corporis, tinea manuum and tinea faciei.

Tinea capitis is most commonly seen in children, likely due to their underdeveloped sebaceous glands and relatively immature immune systems [24, 25, 26]. M. canis was identified as the predominant pathogen causing tinea capitis, consistent with findings from both domestic and international studies [25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. This zoophilic species is frequently carried by household pets such as cats and dogs and can readily infect children who have close contact with these animals [24, 26].

In this study, 14 pathogenic species were isolated, with T. rubrum being the most prevalent, an observation that aligns with previous research [6, 10, 31]. A significant number of Candida infections was also detected, which may be attributed to an ageing population and the widespread use of broad‐spectrum antibiotics, corticosteroids and immunosuppressive therapies [32, 33]. These trends underscore the growing importance of recognising and managing Candida infections.

Moulds, widely recognised as important global pathogens, were primarily associated with onychomycosis in this study. The prevalence of mould‐related infections varies considerably across regions [3]. Studies from Brazil [34], Sri Lanka [35] and Thailand [36] have reported mould involvement in approximately 60% of cases, whereas rates in Europe are substantially lower, at around 5% [3]. In tropical climates such as Thailand, Trichophyton spp. are the predominant pathogens [36, 37], while in Europe, Scopulariopsis brevicaulis, Aspergillus spp., Acremonium spp. and Fusarium spp. are more common [3]. In this study, Aspergillus spp. were the most commonly identified moulds, predominantly causing onychomycosis. These pronounced regional variations likely reflect differences in climate and environmental conditions, as well as socioeconomic and lifestyle factors [38].

This study has several limitations. First, as a single‐centre investigation, the generalisability of the findings may be restricted. Second, auxiliary diagnostic methods incorporating molecular identification were not included. Hopefully, our ongoing research integrates advanced technologies, including a novel artificial intelligence (AI)‐based fluorescence microscopic image analyser (FMIA) [39], MALDI‐TOF MS and combines them with PCR, to develop a comprehensive fungal strain library. This effort will not only reinforce the foundation for future studies but also significantly improve diagnostic accuracy in clinical mycology.

It is also important to recognise that the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections is dynamic and evolves alongside demographic and medical shifts. As China transitions into an ageing society, the proportion of older adults, who are more vulnerable to onychomycosis and Candida infections due to comorbidities and age‐related immune decline is expected to rise [21, 32]. At the same time, the increasing use of immunosuppressive therapies and broad‐spectrum antibiotics may further influence host‐pathogen interactions and alter the spectrum of superficial fungal diseases [40, 41, 42]. As a result, our findings reflect a cross‐sectional snapshot of current epidemiological patterns. A decade from now, pathogen distribution, affected age groups and clinical presentations may differ significantly, just as our results already diverge from reports published in previous decades [21]. These observations underscore the importance of continuous long‐term surveillance to track evolving trends and anticipate emerging challenges in the prevention and management of superficial fungal infections.

Author Contributions

Lianjuan Yang and Qian Yu designed this study. Chunjiao Zheng and Wenjing He performed the data analysis and visualisation. Chunjiao Zheng wrote the paper. Jingwen Tan, Xiaoping Liu, Yuanyuan Wang, Lulu Li and Linan Ni contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Lianjuan Yang and Qian Yu were primarily responsible for the final content.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82173429).

Contributor Information

Qian Yu, Email: yuqian1127@163.com.

Lianjuan Yang, Email: lianjuanyang@163.com.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Havlickova B., Czaika V. A., and Friedrich M., “Epidemiological Trends in Skin Mycoses Worldwide,” Mycoses 51, no. 4 (2008): 2–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zhan P. and Liu W., “The Changing Face of Dermatophytic Infections Worldwide,” Mycopathologia 182, no. 1–2 (2017): 77–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Chanyachailert P., Leeyaphan C., and Bunyaratavej S., “Cutaneous Fungal Infections Caused by Dermatophytes and Non‐Dermatophytes: An Updated Comprehensive Review of Epidemiology, Clinical Presentations, and Diagnostic Testing,” Journal of Fungi 9, no. 6 (2023): 669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kruithoff C., Gamal A., McCormick T. S., and Ghannoum M. A., “Dermatophyte Infections Worldwide: Increase in Incidence and Associated Antifungal Resistance,” Life 14, no. 1 (2023): 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Sharma B. and Nonzom S., “Superficial Mycoses, A Matter of Concern: Global and Indian Scenario‐An Updated Analysis,” Mycoses 64, no. 8 (2021): 890–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Song G., Zhang M., Liu W., and Liang G., “Changing Face of Epidemiology of Dermatophytoses in Chinese Mainland: A 30‐Year Nationwide Retrospective Study From 1991 to 2020,” Mycoses 65, no. 4 (2022): 440–448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Cai W., Lu C., Li X., et al., “Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Guangdong, Southern China: A Retrospective Study From 2004 to 2014,” Mycopathologia 181, no. 5–6 (2016): 387–395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Faure‐Cognet O., Fricker‐Hidalgo H., Pelloux H., and Leccia M. T., “Superficial Fungal Infections in a French Teaching Hospital in Grenoble Area: Retrospective Study on 5470 Samples From 2001 to 2011,” Mycopathologia 181, no. 1–2 (2016): 59–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Welsh O., Welsh E., Ocampo‐Candiani J., Gomez M., and Vera‐Cabrera L., “Dermatophytoses in Monterrey, México,” Mycoses 49, no. 2 (2006): 119–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sacheli R., Cuypers L., Seidel L., et al., “Correction to: Epidemiology of Dermatophytes in Belgium: A 5‐Year' Survey,” Mycopathologia 186, no. 6 (2021): 897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li Q., Li J., Zhi H., et al., “Epidemiological Survey of 32,786 Culture‐Positive Dermatophytosis Cases in Hangzhou From 2018 to 2023,” Mycopathologia 189, no. 6 (2024): 98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gamage H., Sivanesan P., Hipler U. C., Elsner P., and Wiegand C., “Superficial Fungal Infections in the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Jena: A 7‐Year Retrospective Study on 4556 Samples From 2007 to 2013,” Mycoses 63, no. 6 (2020): 558–565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Seudjip N. L. J., Libeko S. K., Ntshila L. K., et al., “Retrospective Epidemiology of Dermatomycosis in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, From 2000 to 2023,” Mycoses 67, no. 12 (2024): e70010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Simonnet C., Berger F., and Gantier J. C., “Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Diseases in French Guiana: A Three‐Year Retrospective Analysis,” Medical Mycology 49, no. 6 (2011): 608–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Nakamura K. and Fukuda T., “2021 Epidemiological Survey of Dermatomycoses in Japan,” Medical Mycology Journal 64, no. 4 (2023): 85–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Song G., Zhang M., Liu W., and Liang G., “Epidemiology of Onychomycosis in Chinese Mainland: A 30‐Year Retrospective Study,” Mycopathologia 187, no. 4 (2022): 323–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Powell J., Porter E., Field S., O'Connell N. H., Carty K., and Dunne C. P., “Epidemiology of Dermatomycoses and Onychomycoses in Ireland (2001‐2020): A Single‐Institution Review,” Mycoses 65, no. 7 (2022): 770–779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Dubljanin E., Zunic J., Vujcic I., et al., “Host‐Pathogen Interaction and Resistance Mechanisms in Dermatophytes,” Pathogens 13, no. 8 (2024): 657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Martinez‐Rossi N. M., Peres N. T. A., Bitencourt T. A., Martins M. P., and Rossi A., “State‐Of‐The‐Art Dermatophyte Infections: Epidemiology Aspects, Pathophysiology, and Resistance Mechanisms,” Journal of Fungi 7, no. 8 (2021): 629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Laughter M. R., Maymone M. B. C., Karimkhani C., et al., “The Burden of Skin and Subcutaneous Diseases in the United States From 1990 to 2017,” JAMA Dermatology 156, no. 8 (2020): 874–881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Qin Q., Su J., Liu J., et al., “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Fungal Skin Diseases in 204 Countries and Territories From 1990 to 2021: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Mycoses 67, no. 8 (2024): e13787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Seebacher C., Bouchara J. P., and Mignon B., “Updates on the Epidemiology of Dermatophyte Infections,” Mycopathologia 166, no. 5–6 (2008): 335–352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Ameen M., “Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections,” Clinical Dermatology 28, no. 2 (2010): 197–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Patel G. A. and Schwartz R. A., “Tinea Capitis: Still an Unsolved Problem?,” Mycoses 54, no. 3 (2011): 183–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Xiao Y. Y., Zhou Y. B., Chao J. J., and Ma L., “Epidemiology of Tinea Capitis in Children in Beijing and Adjacent Regions, China: A 15‐Year Retrospective Study,” Mycopathologia 188, no. 5 (2023): 531–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Chen X. Q., Zheng D. Y., Xiao Y. Y., et al., “Aetiology of Tinea Capitis in China: A Multicentre Prospective Study,” British Journal of Dermatology 186, no. 4 (2022): 705–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cai W., Huang J., Li J., et al., “Epidemiology and Clinical Findings of Tinea Capitis: A 23‐Year Retrospective, Single‐Center Study in Guangzhou, China,” Mycopathologia 188, no. 5 (2023): 507–514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Abastabar M., Babaei M., Mohammadi R., et al., “Iranian National Survey on Tinea Capitis: Antifungal Susceptibility Profile, Epidemiological Characteristics, and Report of Two Strains With a Novel Mutation in SQLE Gene With Homology Modeling,” Mycopathologia 188, no. 5 (2023): 449–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lee W. J., Lee E. H., Bang Y. J., and Jun J. B., “Retrospective Two‐Centre Study on Prepubertal Children With Tinea Capitis in Korea,” Mycoses 63, no. 1 (2020): 52–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Gangneux J. P., Miossec C., Machouart M., et al., “Epidemiology and Management of Tinea Capitis in France: A 6‐Year Nationwide Retrospective Survey,” Medical Mycology 62, no. 7 (2024): myae047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Uhrlaß S., Mey S., Koch D., et al., “Dermatophytes and Skin Dermatophytoses in Southeast Asia‐First Epidemiological Survey From Cambodia,” Mycoses 67, no. 4 (2024): e13718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Shahabudin S., Azmi N. S., Lani M. N., Mukhtar M., and Hossain M. S., “ Candida albicans Skin Infection in Diabetic Patients: An Updated Review of Pathogenesis and Management,” Mycoses 67, no. 6 (2024): e13753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Lu H., Hong T., Jiang Y., Whiteway M., and Zhang S., “ Candidiasis: From Cutaneous to Systemic, New Perspectives of Potential Targets and Therapeutic Strategies,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 199 (2023): 114960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cursi I. B., Freitas L. B., Neves Mde L., and Silva I. C., “Onycomychosis due to Scytalidium spp.: A Clinical and Epidemiologic Study at a University Hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil,” Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia 86, no. 4 (2011): 689–693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Ranawaka R. R., Nagahawatte A., Gunasekara T. A., Weerakoon H. S., and de Silva S. H., “Randomized, Double‐Blind, Comparative Study on Efficacy and Safety of Itraconazole Pulse Therapy and Terbinafine Pulse Therapy on Nondermatophyte Mold Onychomycosis: A Study With 90 Patients,” Journal of Dermatological Treatment 27, no. 4 (2016): 364–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ungpakorn R., Lohaprathan S., and Reangchainam S., “Prevalence of Foot Diseases in Outpatients Attending the Institute of Dermatology, Bangkok, Thailand,” Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 29, no. 1 (2004): 87–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Assadamongkol R., Lertwattanarak R., Wannachalee T., Bunyaratavej S., Leeyaphan C., and Matthapan L., “Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Type of Organism in Fungal Foot Infection and Toenail Onychomycosis in Thai Diabetic Patients,” Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 99, no. 6 (2016): 659–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Li D., Fan S., Zhao H., et al., “Worldwide Trends and Future Projections of Fungal Skin Disease Burden: A Comprehensive Analysis From the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2021,” Frontiers in Public Health 13 (2025): 1580221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. He W., Zheng C., Yang L., and Tan J., “Automatic Fluorescence Microscopic Image Analyzer: A Novel AI‐Based Tool for Early Diagnosing Superficial Fungal Infections,” BMC Infectious Diseases 25, no. 1 (2025): 908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Liu H., Zhou L., Song Z., Zhang R., and Kang Y., “Biologic Therapy and Superficial Fungal Infection Risk in Moderate‐To‐Severe Psoriasis: A Meta‐Analysis,” Mycoses 68, no. 6 (2025): e70081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Enoch D. A., Ludlam H. A., and Brown N. M., “Invasive Fungal Infections: A Review of Epidemiology and Management Options,” Journal of Medical Microbiology 55, no. Pt 7 (2006): 809–818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Drummond R. A., Desai J. V., Ricotta E. E., et al., “Long‐Term Antibiotic Exposure Promotes Mortality After Systemic Fungal Infection by Driving Lymphocyte Dysfunction and Systemic Escape of Commensal Bacteria,” Cell Host & Microbe 30, no. 7 (2022): 1020–1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Mycoses are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES