Skip to main content
Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences logoLink to Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences
. 2025 Nov 8;16:e52. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2025.52

Examination of the biological effects of sunlight on the skin: a review

Zahra Razzaghi 1, Alireza Ahmadzadeh 2,3,*
PMCID: PMC12958273  PMID: 41789281

Abstract

Introduction: Sunlight is essential for all living beings. While certain effects of sunlight are well-established, others require further investigation. Sunlight is composed of electromagnetic spectrum radiation, which can be grouped into three main types: visible, ultraviolet (UV), and infrared (IR). UV radiation is split into three subtypes: UVA, UVB, and UVC, each of which owns unique properties and varying effects on the skin.

Methods: In this review, the main databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar were investigated for studies examining the biological effects of sunlight on the skin by using suitable keywords and specific strategies from 2007 to 2024. All the studies that were not about sunlight and skin were excluded.

Results: The influence of sunlight, particularly UV radiation can lead to a range of biological effects that may be both advantageous and detrimental. Sunlight is closely linked with common skin issues such as sunburn, skin aging, and skin cancer; therefore, the primary objective of this review is to examine the various benefits and drawbacks of sunlight exposure on human skin. The negative impact of solar radiation on the skin is especially evident with prolonged exposure, where UV radiation poses serious health risks, including squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma, and basal cell carcinoma, which are the three most common types of skin cancer.

Conclusion: cancers mainly occur due to DNA damage induced by UV, especially UVB radiation. Furthermore, chronic exposure to UV radiation causes photoaging, which is characterized by the early onset of wrinkles, reduced elasticity, and alterations in skin pigmentation, all of which underscore the enduring effects of sunlight on the skin’s texture.

Keywords: Sunlight, Skin, Biological effect

Introduction

Sunlight plays a noteworthy role in human life, and life would be almost unfeasible for humans in its absence. Sunlight, which encompasses UV, visible, and IR light, influences different perspectives of human life.1 Sunlight is vital for the conversion of 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin to previtamin D3, which is then processed to the active form of vitamin D.2 Sunlight increases the production of serotonin and endorphins, which can uplift mood and decrease the possibility of seasonal affective disorder.3 Moreover, controlled UV emission is utilized to treat skin disorders like vitiligo, eczema, and psoriasis.4 Although sunlight is fundamental for our wellbeing, it can also lead to a variety of adverse effects on the skin.5 The foremost unfavorable impacts of sunlight are basically caused by UV radiation.6 Short-term and long-term exposure to sunlight can yield varying impacts on the skin.7 The prompt results of solar radiation contain erythema, pigmentation, burns, and irritation, and long-lasting exposure to sunlight may cause immunosuppression, premalignant lesions, photoaging,DNA damage, mutations, and skin cancer.8,9 Due to concerns regarding the effects of sunlight on skin health, it is crucial to examine the impact of solar radiation on the skin. Thus, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the biological effects of sunlight on the skin, with a special emphasis on the mechanisms of damage by UV radiation on human skin.

Methodology

The Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases were studied to find any study investigating the effect of sunlight on human skin. The databases were investigated via the keywords “solar”, “skin”, “sunlight”, “biological effect”, “electromagnetic radiation,” “ultraviolet ray”, “visible light”, “infrared radiation”, and their mixtures. All articles, with these keywords in their titles or abstracts, were selected, and unrelated articles were removed. Articles were excluded if they were not published in English, were outdated, or were duplicates. In addition, papers with titles or abstracts that did not address the purpose of this review were excluded from the study (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria included studies in English that examine the effect of sunlight on the skin.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow diagram of the study

The Spectrum of Sunlight

Overall sunlight consists of approximately 44% visible light (ranging from 400 to 780 nm), 53% IR radiation (spanning from 700 nm to 100 μm), and 3% to 7% UV light.10 According to the wavelengths, UV is classified into three distinct categories: UVA (320-400 nm), UVB (290-320 nm), and UVC (100-290 nm).11 Earth’s atmosphere predominantly absorbs UVC radiation, thereby inhibiting its penetration to the skin. UVB radiation is primarily responsible for directly damaging DNA and is the leading cause of sunburn, while UVA radiation penetrates more deeply into the skin, significantly contributing to photoaging and causing indirect DNA damage.12 Sunlight serves as the main natural source of visible light. Visible light, especially within the blue light spectrum, has gained attention for its influence on skin pigmentation and oxidative stress.13 Infrared radiation, especially in the Near-Infrared (NIR) spectrum, has the ability to penetrate the skin significantly, causing the production of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and thermal damage (Table 1).14

Table 1. Composition and wavelength spectrum of sunlight .

Sunlight composition Amount Wavelength Spectrum
IR radiation 53% 750 nm–100 μm Near 0.76 - 1 μm
Mid 3 - 8 μm
far infrared 15 - 1000 μm
Visible light 44% 400 - 780 nm Red 625-750nm
Orange 590-625nm
Yellow 565-590nm
Green 500-565nm
Cyan 485-500nm
Blue 450-485nm
UV 3% to 7% 100-400 nm UVA (320-400 nm)
UVB (290-320 nm)
UVC (100-290 nm)

Sunlight Benefits

The skin acts as a secondary eye for humans. Similar to the eyes, human skin possesses proteins that resemble rod and cone photoreceptors. Human melanocytes and keratinocytes have rhodopsin, which helps melanin production in melanocytes (Figure 2). Moreover, rhodopsin decreases the expression levels of keratin-1 and keratin-10 mRNA, which are the markers of keratinocyte differentiation. 15,16 Exposure to small amounts of sunlight, particularly in the morning before it reaches its peak intensity, can have beneficial effects on humans in various ways. The required amount of sunlight differs based on such features as age, diet, health history, skin tone, and geographical place. Generally, experts recommend 5-15 minutes of sun exposure, and up to 30 minutes for individuals with darker skin tones, to maximize benefits while minimizing health risks.17 The sun’s UV rays assist the human body in producing Vitamin D, which is essential for bone health, blood cell formation, and immune function. Additionally, it aids in the absorption and utilization of specific minerals such as calcium and phosphate.18 Sunlight is essential for regulating the biological clock. Specifically, getting some sunlight in the early morning seems to facilitate nighttime sleep and positively influence both the duration and quality of sleep.19 Exposure to sunlight aids in eliminating excessive body fat. Morning sunlight appears to assist individuals in maintaining weight loss. Regular exposure to the safe amounts of sunlight can help speed up metabolism and might be an effective way to reduce obesity.20 Exposure to sunlight can enhance human mood. Spending 10 to 15 minutes in sunlight daily increases serotonin levels. Furthermore, light has been shown to affect the binding of serotonin at the serotonin 1A receptor site.21,22 In addition, sunlight can be used to treat jaundice that frequently affects infants. It occurs when there is too much bilirubin in the blood, which makes a baby’s skin appear yellow. Getting sunlight for 30 to 60 minutes twice a day can help bilirubin removal.23

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Rhodopsin receptor and signaling pathway in melanocyte. Sunlight activates the rhodopsin receptor and causes the influx of Ca2+, which is followed by the stimulation of the CAMK /ERK (Ca calmodulin-dependent protein kinase/ Extracellular signal-regulated kinases) pathway, and it finally results in the phosphorylation of MITF (Melanocyte Inducing Transcription Factor), which increases the melanogenesis enzymes like tyrosinase

Harmful Effects of Sunlight

Short-Term Effects

1. Sunburn

Sunburn or erythema is an acute inflammatory response of the skin triggered by exposure to UVB radiation. Sunburn is clinically presented as erythema (redness) of the skin and may result in pain and blister formation. It is an accepted risk factor for the onset of cutaneous melanoma and keratinocyte cancers and may correlate with an elevated risk of herpes zoster.24-26

2. Pigmentation

Pigmentation is produced by specialized dendritic cells referred to as melanocytes. These cells synthesize melanin within particular organelles known as melanosomes, which are then conveyed to neighboring keratinocytes. The presence of melanin and the distribution of melanosomes in the epidermis are critical factors in safeguarding the skin against the dangerous effects of UV rays.27,28 UVA and UVB rays stimulate pigmentation through different mechanisms. UVA causes immediate darkening of pigment shortly after exposure, as well as delayed tanning that occurs over several days, whereas UVB is responsible solely for delayed tanning.29

Long-Term Effects

1. Photoaging

Prolonged exposure to UVA radiation and UVB radiation leads to photoaging, a condition characterized by the early onset of skin aging.30 This phenomenon is characterized by the development of wrinkles, a decrease in skin elasticity, and alterations in pigmentation, primarily due to the harmful impact of UV rays on collagen and elastin fibers.31 Additionally, there is an increase in metalloproteinases (MMPs) within dermal fibroblasts and a buildup of oxidative stress in the skin. Such damage leads to a rough skin texture and uneven pigmentation, both of which are hallmarks of aging.32,33 Although treatments like lasers and chemical peels can alleviate some symptoms of photoaging, they are unable to fully reverse the effects of prolonged UV exposure.34

2. DNA damage

UVA and UVB rays both contribute to DNA damage, but UVA is less potent in causing direct DNA damage compared to UVB rays.35 UVA radiation produces ROS, including singlet oxygen and hydroxyl radicals, which have the potential to oxidize DNA bases, leading to mutations like 8-oxoguanine.36 UVB radiation is absorbed directly by DNA, resulting in the creation of thymine dimers. This DNA damage causes distortions in the helical structure, which disrupts both replication and transcription processes.37

3. Immunosuppression

UV radiation contributes to the suppression of both local and systemic immune responses38 by directly or indirectly activating various cells located in the skin. These include epidermal keratinocytes, lymphocytes, Langerhans cells, and mast cells.39 UV radiation alters the activity of cytokines and other immune response mediators, such as platelet-activating factor (PAF), prostaglandin E2, nitric oxide, and antimicrobial peptides.40 Some of these mediators facilitate the recruitment of circulating immune cells from the bloodstream. For instance, after exposure to solar radiation, neutrophils quickly infiltrate the skin. These UV-recruited neutrophils and regulatory T cells generate anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive cytokines such as IL-4, resulting in local immune suppression.41,42

4. Skin cancer

Skin cancer primarily develops due to DNA damage caused by UV radiation that goes unrepaired, along with the effects of immune suppression.Base substitution and pyrimidine dimer formation are among the most important mutations induced by sunlight.43,44 There are three main types of skin cancer:basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma.45,46 Basal cell carcinoma represents the more common kind of skin cancer, which typically occurs in the body areas that are frequently exposed to sunlight. This form of cancer generally exhibits slow growth and has a low likelihood of metastasis; however, if left untreated, it can lead to the formation of significant sores.47,48 Squamous cell carcinoma, while also common, carries a higher risk due to its ability to metastasize, rendering it more perilous than basal cell carcinoma.49,50 Although melanoma is the rarest type, it is the most aggressive type of skin cancer and accounts for the majority of fatalities associated with this disease. It is marked by the appearance of new lesions and is closely associated with intermittent ultraviolet exposure and severe sunburn, particularly during childhood and adolescence.51,52

Conclusion

Sunlight has both positive and negative impacts on the skin. While controlled exposure is needed for the generation of vitamin D and improves psychological health, excessive exposure causes serious concerns like photoaging, DNA harm, and an elevated danger of skin cancer. Due to the diverse impacts of sunlight on skin health, it is critical to conduct research on the biological influences of sunlight on skin health, which was the aim of this study. Future examinations should give enhanced protective strategies and treatments to reduce the long-term consequences of sunlight on the skin.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by IR.SBMU.RETECH.REC.1404.064.

Funding

This manuscript supported by Proteomics Research Center.

Please cite this article as follows: Razzaghi Z, Ahmadzadeh A. Examination of the biological effects of sunlight on the skin: a review. J Lasers Med Sci. 2025;16:e52. doi:10.34172/jlms.2025.52.

References

  • 1.Verma A, Zanoletti A, Kareem KY, Adelodun B, Kumar P, Ajibade FO, et al. Skin protection from solar ultraviolet radiation using natural compounds: a review. Environ Chem Lett. 2024;22(1):273–95. doi: 10.1007/s10311-023-01649-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Prabhu AV, Luu W, Li D, Sharpe LJ, Brown AJ. DHCR7: a vital enzyme switch between cholesterol and vitamin D production. Prog Lipid Res. 2016;64:138–51. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2016.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mead MN. Benefits of sunlight: a bright spot for human health. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(4):A160–7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.116-a160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vieyra-Garcia PA, Wolf P. A deep dive into UV-based phototherapy: mechanisms of action and emerging molecular targets in inflammation and cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;222:107784. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tang X, Yang T, Yu D, Xiong H, Zhang S. Current insights and future perspectives of ultraviolet radiation (UV) exposure: friends and foes to the skin and beyond the skin. Environ Int. 2024;185:108535. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gallagher RP, Lee TK. Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation: a brief review. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2006;92(1):119–31. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2006.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Merin KA, Shaji M, Kameswaran R. A review on sun exposure and skin diseases. Indian J Dermatol. 2022;67(5):625. doi: 10.4103/ijd.ijd_1092_20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shin DW. Various biological effects of solar radiation on skin and their mechanisms: implications for phototherapy. Anim Cells Syst (Seoul) 2020;24(4):181–8. doi: 10.1080/19768354.2020.1808528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Letsiou S, Koldiri E, Beloukas A, Rallis E, Kefala V. Deciphering the effects of different types of sunlight radiation on skin function: a review. Cosmetics. 2024;11(3):80. doi: 10.3390/cosmetics11030080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Solano F. Photoprotection and skin pigmentation: melanin-related molecules and some other new agents obtained from natural sources. Molecules. 2020;25(7):1537. doi: 10.3390/molecules25071537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dale Wilson B, Moon S, Armstrong F. Comprehensive review of ultraviolet radiation and the current status on sunscreens. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2012;5(9):18–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Richard EG. The science and (lost) art of psoralen plus UVA phototherapy. Dermatol Clin. 2020;38(1):11–23. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.de Gálvez EN, Aguilera J, Solis A, de Gálvez MV, de Andrés JR, Herrera-Ceballos E, et al. The potential role of UV and blue light from the sun, artificial lighting, and electronic devices in melanogenesis and oxidative stress. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2022;228:112405. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2022.112405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Henderson TA, Morries LD. Near-infrared photonic energy penetration: can infrared phototherapy effectively reach the human brain? Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:2191–208. doi: 10.2147/ndt.S78182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim HJ, Son ED, Jung JY, Choi H, Lee TR, Shin DW. Violet light down-regulates the expression of specific differentiation markers through rhodopsin in normal human epidermal keratinocytes. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e73678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.de Assis LV, Moraes MN, Magalhães-Marques KK, de Lauro Castrucci AM. Melanopsin and rhodopsin mediate UVA-induced immediate pigment darkening: Unravelling the photosensitive system of the skin. Eur J Cell Biol. 2018;97(3):150–62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Farrar MD, Kift R, Felton SJ, Berry JL, Durkin MT, Allan D, et al. Recommended summer sunlight exposure amounts fail to produce sufficient vitamin D status in UK adults of South Asian origin. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;94(5):1219–24. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.019976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sawicki CM, Van Rompay MI, Au LE, Gordon CM, Sacheck JM. Sun-exposed skin color is associated with changes in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D in racially/ethnically diverse children. J Nutr. 2016;146(4):751–7. doi: 10.3945/jn.115.222505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Blume C, Garbazza C, Spitschan M. Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood. Somnologie (Berl) 2019;23(3):147–56. doi: 10.1007/s11818-019-00215-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fleury N, Geldenhuys S, Gorman S. Sun exposure and its effects on human health: mechanisms through which sun exposure could reduce the risk of developing obesity and cardiometabolic dysfunction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(10):999. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13100999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Sunshine, serotonin, and skin: a partial explanation for seasonal patterns in psychopathology? Innov Clin Neurosci. 2013;10(7-8):20–4. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lambert GW, Reid C, Kaye DM, Jennings GL, Esler MD. Effect of sunlight and season on serotonin turnover in the brain. Lancet. 2002;360(9348):1840–2. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)11737-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Horn D, Ehret D, Gautham KS, Soll R. Sunlight for the prevention and treatment of hyperbilirubinemia in term and late preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;7(7):CD013277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013277.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Olsen CM, Pandeya N, Law MH, MacGregor S, Iles MM, Thompson BS, et al. Does polygenic risk influence associations between sun exposure and melanoma? A prospective cohort analysis. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(2):303–10. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Savoye I, Olsen CM, Whiteman DC, Bijon A, Wald L, Dartois L, et al. Patterns of ultraviolet radiation exposure and skin cancer risk: the E3N-SunExp study. J Epidemiol. 2018;28(1):27–33. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20160166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kawai K, VoPham T, Drucker A, Curhan SG, Curhan GC. Ultraviolet radiation exposure and the risk of herpes zoster in three prospective cohort studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2020;95(2):283–92. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.08.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sturm RA. Human pigmentation genes and their response to solar UV radiation. Mutat Res. 1998;422(1):69–76. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00176-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maddodi N, Jayanthy A, Setaluri V. Shining light on skin pigmentation: the darker and the brighter side of effects of UV radiation. Photochem Photobiol. 2012;88(5):1075–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2012.01138.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lerche CM, Philipsen PA, Wulf HC. UVR: sun, lamps, pigmentation and vitamin D. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2017;16(3):291–301. doi: 10.1039/c6pp00277c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tanveer MA, Rashid H, Tasduq SA. Molecular basis of skin photoaging and therapeutic interventions by plant-derived natural product ingredients: a comprehensive review. Heliyon. 2023;9(3):e13580. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Salminen A, Kaarniranta K, Kauppinen A. Photoaging: UV radiation-induced inflammation and immunosuppression accelerate the aging process in the skin. Inflamm Res. 2022;71(7-8):817–31. doi: 10.1007/s00011-022-01598-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cannarozzo G, Fazia G, Bennardo L, Tamburi F, Amoruso GF, Del Duca E, et al. A new 675 nm laser device in the treatment of facial aging: a prospective observational study. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021;39(2):118–22. doi: 10.1089/photob.2020.4908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Liebel F, Kaur S, Ruvolo E, Kollias N, Southall MD. Irradiation of skin with visible light induces reactive oxygen species and matrix-degrading enzymes. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(7):1901–7. doi: 10.1038/jid.2011.476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Avci P, Gupta A, Sadasivam M, Vecchio D, Pam Z, Pam N, et al. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) in skin: stimulating, healing, restoring. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2013;32(1):41–52. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mullenders LH. Solar UV damage to cellular DNA: from mechanisms to biological effects. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 2018;17(12):1842–52. doi: 10.1039/c8pp00182k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rastogi RP, Richa Richa, Kumar A, Tyagi MB, Sinha RP. Molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage and repair. J Nucleic Acids. 2010;2010:592980. doi: 10.4061/2010/592980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Vechtomova YL, Telegina TA, Buglak AA, Kritsky MS. UV radiation in DNA damage and repair involving DNA-photolyases and cryptochromes. Biomedicines. 2021;9(11):1564. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.González Maglio DH, Paz ML, Leoni J. Sunlight effects on immune system: is there something else in addition to UV-induced immunosuppression? Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1934518. doi: 10.1155/2016/1934518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hart PH, Norval M. Are there differences in immune responses following delivery of vaccines through acutely or chronically sun-exposed compared with sun-unexposed skin? Immunology. 2020;159(2):133–41. doi: 10.1111/imm.13128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hart PH, Norval M. More than effects in skin: ultraviolet radiation-induced changes in immune cells in human blood. Front Immunol. 2021;12:694086. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.694086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Bernard JJ, Gallo RL, Krutmann J. Photoimmunology: how ultraviolet radiation affects the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(11):688–701. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0185-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Katiyar SK. UV-induced immune suppression and photocarcinogenesis: chemoprevention by dietary botanical agents. Cancer Lett. 2007;255(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2007.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hayward NK, Wilmott JS, Waddell N, Johansson PA, Field MA, Nones K, et al. Whole-genome landscapes of major melanoma subtypes. Nature. 2017;545(7653):175–80. doi: 10.1038/nature22071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Premi S, Han L, Mehta S, Knight J, Zhao D, Palmatier MA, et al. Genomic sites hypersensitive to ultraviolet radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(48):24196–205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907860116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jones OT, Ranmuthu CKI, Hall PN, Funston G, Walter FM. Recognising skin cancer in primary care. Adv Ther. 2020;37(1):603–16. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01130-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Garbe C, Forsea AM, Amaral T, Arenberger P, Autier P, Berwick M, et al. Skin cancers are the most frequent cancers in fair-skinned populations, but we can prevent them. Eur J Cancer. 2024;204:114074. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Dika E, Scarfì F, Ferracin M, Broseghini E, Marcelli E, Bortolani B, et al. Basal cell carcinoma: a comprehensive review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(15):5572. doi: 10.3390/ijms21155572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Baba PU, Hassan AU, Khurshid J, Wani AH. Basal cell carcinoma: diagnosis, management and prevention. J Mol Pathol. 2024;5(2):153–70. doi: 10.3390/jmp5020010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Combalia A, Carrera C. Squamous cell carcinoma: an update on diagnosis and treatment. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020;10(3):e2020066. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1003a66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jiang R, Fritz M, Que SKT. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: an updated review. Cancers (Basel) 2024;16(10):1800. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Davis LE, Shalin SC, Tackett AJ. Current state of melanoma diagnosis and treatment. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20(11):1366–79. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2019.1640032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hsieh MY, Hsu SK, Liu TY, Wu CY, Chiu CC. Melanoma biology and treatment: a review of novel regulated cell death-based approaches. Cancer Cell Int. 2024;24(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12935-024-03220-9. Equis elisi tem quatest, non. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES