Table 8.
Comparative results between the clinical dataset (I) and the Wisconsin dataset (II).
| Metric | Dataset I | Dataset II | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (Std.) | 0.92 | 0.94 | +10.3% |
| Precision (Std.) | 0.91 | 1.000 | +17.9% |
| Recall (Std.) | 0.91 | 0.90 | +3.8% |
| F1 score (Std.) | 0.93 | 0.92 | +10.3% |
| AUC | 0.95 | 0.99 | +9.1% |
| Certain accuracy (τ = 0.15) | 0.95 | 0.98 | +5.7% |
| Certain precision | 1.000 | 1.000 | – |
| Uncertain predictions (%) | 10.9 | 8.8 | ↓2.1% |