Table 2. CERA-Specific FINER Framework to Evaluate the Research Question.
|
FINER Criteria for Research Question Development | |
|---|---|
|
Feasibility |
The question can be addressed given a 10-question survey. Feasible: Understand the perceived level of importance, knowledge, and level of comfort that family physicians feel discussing menstrual health. Not feasible: Understand the value of menstrual health discussions with family medicine patients. |
|
Interesting |
The question should be intriguing to the investigative team and audience. Interesting: What are the effects of grade appeals on the clerkship director? Not interesting: What is the pathway to anesthesia residency completion? |
|
Novel |
The question and hypothesis should not have been studied previously. Review the prior CERA survey data and complete a brief literature review to identify publications and research in a similar area. |
|
Ethical |
The hypotheses and questions asked uphold the safety and well-being of the population being studied. Questions that could place a chair, program director, or member of STFM at risk of being harmed (often psychologically) are not accepted by CERA. |
|
Relevance |
The research should add to the science of family medicine. Relevance evolves; at the publication of this article, vaccine uptake in primary care is key. A relevant question may be, “What are the barriers to adult vaccination uptake (eg, shingles, pneumococcal) in patients aged 60+ in a family medicine clinic?” |
Abbreviations: CERA, Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance; FINER, feasibility, interesting, novel, ethical, relevance; STFM, Society of Teachers of Family Medicine