Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 23;12:1656420. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1656420

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

First author Intervention group sample size Control group sample size Year Follow-up duration, months Median age (experimental group) Median age (control group) Male/
female (experimental group)
Male/
female (control group)
Intervention arm Control arm Control strategy AF type Country Comorbidities
Nassir F. Marrouche (19) 179 184 2018 37.8 63.67 ± 11.11 64.5 ± 12.96 156/23 155/29 Catheter ablation Rate control +
rhythm control
AADS +
β-blockers +
digoxin
Paroxysmal 48.6%
Persistent 51.4%
USA HTN: 65%, DM: 25%, CAD: 18%
Douglas L. Packer (20) 378 400 2021 48.5 68 ± 6.4 67 ± 6.2 207/171 226/174 Catheter ablation Rate control +
rhythm control
AADS +
β-blockers
Predominantly persistent USA HTN: 71%, DM: 28%, CAD: 20%
Ratika Parkash (21) 214 197 2022 24 66.33 ± 9.63 67.33 ± 9.63 157/57 148/49 Catheter ablation Rate control β-blockers +
digoxin
36% paroxysmal, 64% persistent Canada NR
Karl-Heinz Kuck (22) 68 72 2019 12 65 ± 8 65 ± 8 60/8 66/6 Catheter ablation Rate control +
rhythm control
AADS +
β-blockers +
digoxin
36.9% paroxysmal, 63.1% persistent Germany NR
Ross J. Hunter (23) 26 24 2014 6 59.0 ± 10.0 61.0 ± 9.0 23/3 21/3 Catheter ablation Rate control β-blockers +
digoxin
100% persistent UK NR
Luigi Di Biase (24) 102 101 2016 24 62 ± 10 60 ± 11 77/25 74/27 Catheter ablation Rhythm control AADS 100% persistent USA HTN: 67%, DM: 24%
David G. Jones (25) 26 26 2013 12 64 ± 10 62 ± 9 21/5 24/2 Catheter ablation Rate control β-blockers/
digoxin
100% persistent UK NR
Michael R. MacDonald (26) 22 19 2011 6.9 ± 0.9 62.3 ± 6.7 64.4 ± 8.3 17/5 15/4 Catheter ablation Rate control β-blockers/
digoxin
100% persistent UK HTN: 48%, Stroke/TIA: 11%
Christian Sohns (27) 97 97 2023 18 62 ± 12 65 ± 10 85/12 72/25 Catheter ablation Rate control +
rhythm control
AADS +
β-blockers
100% persistent Germany NR
R J Shelton (28) 30 31 2009 12 74.2 ± 8.0 75.9 ± 11.8 26/4 25/6 Catheter ablation Rate control β-blockers +
digoxin
Not reported UK NR
Chieng D (29) 16 15 2023 6 65.5 ± 7.6 66.7 ± 7.9 8/8 7/8 Catheter ablation Rate control +
rhythm control
AADS +
β-blockers
100% persistent Australia NR
Ronald S. Freudenberger (30) 1661 1650 2007 42 69.0 ± 9.0 69.0 ± 9.0 1230/431 1221/429 Rhythm control Rate control β-blockers +
digoxin
29.2% paroxysmal, 70.8% persistent USA NR
Rosita Zakeri (31) 52 50 2022 94 60 ± 11 63 ± 11 46/6 47/3 Catheter ablation Rate control β-blockers +
digoxin
12% paroxysmal, 88% persistent UK NR
Akira Fukui (32) 35 50 2020 27 70 ± 8 71 ± 13 23/12 32/18 Catheter ablation Rate control +
rhythm control
AADS +
β-blockers +
digoxin
100% persistent Japan NR
Vincent E. Hagens (33) 131 130 2005 27.6 69 ± 8 69 ± 9 85/46 85/45 Rhythm control Rate control β-blockers +
digoxin
100% persistent Netherlands HTN: 54%, DM: 15%, LVH: 20%
Denis Roy (34) 682 694 2008 37 66 ± 11 67 ± 11 532/150 590/104 Rhythm control Rate control β-blockers +
digoxin
not reported Canada HTN: 63%, DM: 18%, CAD: 32%

CA, Catheter ablation; RhC, Rhythm control; RC, Rate control; Rh + RC, Combined rhythm and rate control; HTN, Hypertension; DM, Diabetes Mellitus; CAD, Coronary Artery Disease; LVH, Left Ventricular Hypertrophy; TIA, Transient Ischemic Attack; NR, Not reported. Percentages indicate the proportion of patients within each study arm.