. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Mar 10.

Published before final editing as: Mindfulness (N Y). 2026 Mar 9:10.1007/s12671-026-02787-w. doi: 10.1007/s12671-026-02787-w

Table 7.

Predicting Utilization and Clinical Outcomes from Active Proportion in Sample 2

Outcome Variable	Active Proportion Variable	Number of Days of App Engagement	Number of Practices	β	95% CI	p
Sum Practice	Active Proportion	30	>1	0.57	[0.16, 0.98]	0.007
Sum Practice	Active Proportion²	30	>1	−0.43	[−0.84, −0.02]	0.039
Sum Days	Active Proportion	30	>1	0.54	[0.14, 0.95]	0.008
Sum Days	Active Proportion²	30	>1	−0.43	[−0.83, −0.03]	0.036
T2 Psychological Distress	Active Proportion	30	>1	0.35	[0.01, 0.69]	0.043
T2 Psychological Distress	Active Proportion²	30	>1	−0.30	[−0.64, 0.04]	0.083
T3 Psychological Distress	Active Proportion	30	>1	0.35	[0.03, 0.67]	0.034
T3 Psychological Distress	Active Proportion²	30	>1	−0.40	[−0.72, −0.08]	0.016

Note. Active Proportion = the proportion of active meditation practice divided by the overall number of practices. β = standardized coefficient. The sample size for the analyses was 248. Demographics and T1 Psychological Distress were included as covariates in all models.