Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 9;17(4):1120–1137. doi: 10.1007/s12671-026-02787-w

Table 2.

Sample demographics and utilization metrics for Sample 1 (N = 26,532)

Variable Mean SD n % Min Max Skew Kurtosis
Sum Practice 9.27 10.68 2 224 4.15 35.33
Sum Practice (winsorized) 7.92 6.04 2 20.1 0.9 2.48
Sum Days 8.57 6.92 1 31 1.31 4.05
Sum Sitting 5.88 7.78 0 124 3.94 31.19
Sum Active 3.39 6.36 0 147 7.87 106.7
Active Proportiona 0.38 0.27 0 1 0.51 2.39
Used HMP on day 30b 4724 7.2%
Age
 Above 34 17,933 67.6
 34 or less 8132 30.9
 Unknown 467 1.8
Gender
 Man 8244 31.1
 Woman 17,492 65.9
 Other 397 1.5
 Unknown 301 1.5
Education
 Non-college grad 6046 22.8
 College grad or higher 16,984 64.0
 Unknown 3502 13.2
Marital status
 Unmarried 12,244 46.1
 Married 13,413 50.7
 Unknown 875 3.3
Race and ethnicity
 NL White 18,097 68.2
 Black 994 3.7
 Latine 1703 6.4
 Asian 1409 5.3
 Native 190 0.7
 Other 681 2.6
 Unknown 3398 13.0

M(SD) = mean (standard deviation); Min minimum, Max maximum, NL White Non-Latine White, winsorized winsorized to two standard deviations

aThe Active Proportion when examining > 2 practices was 0.37, when examining > 3 practices was 0.36 and when examining > 9 practices was 0.35. When examining just the first 7 days of engagement for individuals who engaged in > 1 practice, Active Proportion was 0.40

bThis percentage is based on the sample of HMP users who provided any demographic data (N = 65,755, i.e., prior to restricting to those with ≥ 2 practices)