Skip to main content
. 2026 Mar 9;17(4):1120–1137. doi: 10.1007/s12671-026-02787-w

Table 3.

Sample demographics and utilization metrics for Sample 2 (N = 248)

Variable Mean SD n % Min Max Skew Kurtosis
Sum Practice 19.35 8.64 2 33  − 0.52 2.10
Sum Days 14.96 7.37 1 29  − 0.14 1.95
Sum Sitting 13.68 7.89 0 30 0.20 2.01
Sum Active 5.67 6.17 0 25 1.28 3.92
Active Proportiona 0.28 0.26 0 1 0.75 2.49
Used HMP on day 30 69 27.8
T1 Psychological Distressb 0.02 0.86  − 2.58 2.03  − 0.24 2.79
T2 Psychological Distressc  − 0.62 0.89  − 3.31 1.82  − 0.15 3.07
T3 Psychological Distressd  − 0.50 0.83  − 2.69 1.70 0.02 2.74
Age 42.6 10.61 23 73 0.31 2.61
Gender
 Man 26 10.5
 Woman 221 89.1
 Unknown 1 0.4
Education
 Non-college grad 26 10.5
 College grad or higher 221 89.1
 Unknown 1 0.4
Marital status
 Unmarried 70 28.2
 Married 177 71.4
 Unknown 1 0.4
Income
 $50,000 or less 40 16.1
 $50,000–$100,000 101 40.7
 $100,000–$150,000 77 31.0
 $150,000 or more 27 10.9
 Unknown 3 1.2
Race and ethnicity
 NL White 223 89.9
 Black 3 1.2
 Latine 1 0.4
 Asian 4 1.6
 Multiracial 11 4.4
 Unknown 6 2.4

M(SD) = mean (standard deviation); Min minimum, Max maximum, NL White Non-Latine White, winsorized winsorized to two standard deviations

aThe Active Proportion when examining > 2 practices was 0.28, when examining > 3 practices was 0.28 and when examining > 9 practices was 0.29. When examining just the first 7 days of engagement for individuals who engaged in > 1 practice, Active Proportion was 0.30

b T1 Psychological Distress at baseline (n = 246)

cT2 Psychological Distress at post-treatment (n = 228)

dT3 Psychological Distress at 3-month follow-up (n = 228)