Skip to main content
Blood Research logoLink to Blood Research
. 2026 Mar 7;61(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s44313-026-00127-4

Epstein–Barr virus-associated lymphoma: current understanding and treatment strategies

Hee Young Ju 1,
PMCID: PMC12972171  PMID: 41793645

Abstract

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) infection is well-known for its high prevalence rate, association with several diseases including cancer and autoimmune conditions, and a wide variety of symptoms and prognosis. When acquired at a young age, primary infections are often asymptomatic; however, in adolescence and young adulthood, symptomatic infections develop, such as in infectious mononucleosis. A special feature of EBV infection is its ability to establish a latent infection in B cells which can lead to long-term infection. Subsequent cellular transformation and viral protein expression can result to EBV-mediated carcinogenesis. Latent proteins expressed by EBV play a role in the pathogenesis of EBV infection and carcinogenesis. These proteins are responsible for a diverse range of functions including cell transformation, cell reprogramming, immune evasion, immune suppression, angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation, and B-cell receptor mimicry.

EBV infection is associated with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, NK/T cell lymphoma, Burkitt lymphoma, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, and primary CNS lymphoma. The clinical presentation varies depending on the specific disease and EBV status, with EBV-positive lymphomas generally associated with poorer prognosis than EBV-negative cases.

This review aimed to examine the current understanding of the pathogenesis of EBV-associated lymphoma and to evaluate emerging and accepted therapeutic strategies.

Keywords: Epstein–Barr virus, Lymphoma, Lymphomagenesis

Introduction

The Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a large (−175 kb) gamma herpesvirus that infects > 90% of the human population [1]. EBV was initially observed in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt lymphoma sample by M.A. Epstein, Y.M. Barr, and B.G. Achong and reported in 1964 [2, 3]. Thus, the association between EBV and lymphoma has been known since its discovery.

EBV infection in early childhood is usually asymptomatic, but can manifest as infectious mononucleosis in adolescents and young adults. Human B cells are the main host cells for EBV, and one of its defining characteristic is its capacity to cause latent B cell infection [4]. EBV latency is thought to be established by a combination of low antigen expression, dedicated immune evasion proteins, and microRNAs [57].

EBV-associated cancer can develop when the infection is not well controlled within the B cells or if the virus spreads to other lymphocyte populations, such as T cells and previously mutated epithelial cells. EBV-associated tumors account for approximately 2% of all human malignancies [8, 9].

EBV and lymphomagenesis

Observations of the geographic distribution of endemic Burkitt lymphoma has improved the understanding of EBV-associated lymphoma pathogenesis. The incidence of endemic Burkitt lymphoma, which is related to co-infection with Plasmodium falciparum malaria and EBV, is high in the mid-African damp and humid regions. This finding is explained by the fact that P. falciparum malaria promotes prolonged expansion of germinal centers containing activation-induced cytidine deaminase-expressing B cells and a more mature lymphoma phenotype [10]. In addition, P. falciparum co-infection might compromise EBV-specific immune control, particularly Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA) 1, resulting in elevated EBV viral loads [11, 12]. Other co-infections known to be related to EBV-associated lymphoma include human immunodeficiency virus infection, which suppresses immune responses against EBV, thus promoting lymphoma development [13]. Another unique population is EBV-associated lymphoma, which is related to immune suppression by inborn errors of immunity (e.g., X-linked lymphoproliferative disease) [14]. The host’s genetics and co-infection with disparate pathogens both promote EBV-associated lymphomagenesis by limiting the host’s immune responses.

After transmission via saliva, EBV reaches the mucosal epithelial cells of the host and, after transcytosis, reaches the submucosal lymphoid tissues. Subsequently, EBV infects B cells. Then, the EBV genome circularizes into episomes and starts to express viral anti-apoptotic proteins, viral BCL-2 homologues BamHI-A rightward frame (BARF1) and BHRF1, as well as the latent EBV gene products, EBNA2 and EBNA-leader protein (EBNA-LP). Subsequently, EBNA2 and EBNA-LP amplify the expression of latency-associated EBV gene products (EBNA1, EBNA2, EBNA3A, EBNA3B, EBNA3C, and EBNA-LP), non-translated RNAs, and microRNAs, consequently replicating the viral DNA through host cell proliferation [7]. The produced proteins play important roles in the pathogenesis of EBV infection and carcinogenesis through cell transformation, cell reprogramming, immune suppression, immune evasion, angiogenesis, cell cycle regulation, and B cell receptor (BCR) mimicry [15, 16]. Latent membrane protein (LMP)1 can emulate the signaling of the B cell surface receptor CD40, thereby activating the nuclear factor kappa B (NF‐κB), c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK), mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathways to facilitate B cell proliferation and modulate the immune response for survival. This function is pivotal in EBV infection and latency establishment. During the transition from latent to lytic infection, EBV strategically targets the host Toll-like receptors to diminish the production of type I interferons (IFNs) and the host antiviral activity, thereby evading immune detection. Among the lytic EBV proteins, BamHI Z fragment leftward open reading frame (BZLF1) reduces the responsiveness of intracellular receptors to tumor necrosis factor-alpha and IFNγ) as well as regulates NF‐κB activity and inhibits the expression of IFN-α and IFN-β. By employing various immunomodulatory strategies during its latent and lytic phases, EBV ensures the persistence of its genome and production of viral particles, thereby facilitating infection. Investigating the mechanisms and distinctions of immune regulation during the latent and lytic phases of EBV infection is essential for developing novel therapeutic strategies for managing EBV-associated diseases [17].

EBV can establish multiple types of latent infections—latency 0, I, II, and III— with different viral proteins produced at each latency. Malignancies are strongly associated with specific latent states (Fig. 1). Burkitt lymphoma is associated with type I latency, whereas Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is associated with type II or III latency. Hodgkin lymphoma and NK/T lymphomas exhibit type II latency, whereas post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is usually associated with type III or II latency [18]. Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpes virus-associated primary effusion lymphomas express latency I, while nasopharyngeal carcinoma and gastric carcinoma express latency IIa and I, respectively [7].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-driven lymphomagenesis. EBNA, Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen; EBNA-LP, Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen leader protein; LMP, latent membrane protein

Burkitt lymphoma exhibits type I latency, with EBNA1 as the main latency protein. Several studies have shown that EBNA1 miRNAs alter gene expression in multiple cellular processes including apoptosis, transcription, and gene regulation [19]. In addition, EBNA1 knockout results in the apoptosis of EBV-infected cells and leads to episomal loss in Burkitt lymphoma cells, showing that EBNA1 can enhance resistance to apoptosis [20].

DLBCL expresses Type III latency, and EBNA2 has been reported to play a role in oncogenesis [21]. EBNA2 is known to increase Programmed Death Ligand (PD-L)1 expression by downregulating miR-34a. In addition, the inactivation of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 signaling induces constitutive expression of the PI3K pathway [22]. EBV-associated DLBCL expresses increased levels of NF-kB and EBV-mediated STAT3 upregulation, which results to inhibition of B-cell differentiation and downregulation of apoptosis genes [23, 24].

NK/T cell lymphoma expresses type II latency. LMP1 activates NF-kB, which in turn activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) coactivator-1 β (PGC1β), leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and reactive oxygen species generation.

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma is also associated with type II latency. LMP1 reprograms germinal center B cells to resemble the Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) phenotype [25]. Moreover, LMP1 activates the PI3K-protein kinase B (AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) axis to inhibit T cell activation. This leads to enhanced regulatory T cell recruitment and autophagy regulation [26]. The tumor microenvironment (TME) also plays a significant role in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. With LMP2A expression, Syk/PI3K/NF-kB signaling is activated, attracting immune cells into the TME. Furthermore, EBV promotes the migration of regulatory T cells to the TME, providing EBV-infected cells with the ability to downregulate anti-tumor immune responses [27]. Recent studies have shown that although the lymphoma clone loses its EBV genome over time, EBV infection is still detectable using highly sensitive methods, indicating that lymphomagenesis of a subset of EBV-negative lymphomas is related to EBV [28].

EBV-associated lymphoma: classification

Table 1 summarizes the lymphoma subtypes that incorporate EBV into their diagnostic classification, as outlined in the newly updated World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumors (WHO-HAEM) [29]. While EBV may not be explicitly mentioned in the diagnostic classification nomenclature, it is widely recognized that EBV plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of various lymphomas. For example, Burkitt lymphoma has been historically categorized into three subtypes: "endemic," "non-endemic or sporadic," and "immunodeficiency-associated" [30]. However, recent findings indicate that EBV-positive and -negative Burkitt lymphomas represent distinct biological categories based on their molecular characteristics, independent of the epidemiological context and geographic location. EBV-positive and -negative Burkitt lymphomas share coding mutations that affect pathways such as BCR and PI3K signaling, apoptosis, the SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable complex, and G protein-coupled receptor signaling [3133]. Nevertheless, EBV-positive Burkitt lymphoma demonstrates significantly higher levels of somatic hypermutations, especially in non-coding regions near the transcription start site; contain fewer driver mutations, particularly in the apoptosis pathway; and has a lower incidence of mutations in genes encoding the transcription factor TCF3 or its repressor ID3 than EBV-negative Burkitt lymphoma [31]. Based on these findings, the WHO-HAEM5 advises distinguishing EBV-positive and EBV-negative Burkitt lymphoma. Furthermore, unlike tumors such as Burkitt lymphoma or nasopharyngeal carcinoma, in which the EBV genome is consistently detected, only a portion of patients with classic Hodgkin lymphoma exhibit a persistent presence of EBV. In EBV-positive classic Hodgkin lymphoma, viral latent proteins such as LMP1 and LMP2A deliver essential survival and proliferative signals, whereas in EBV-negative classic Hodgkin lymphoma, similar oncogenic pathways are activated through somatic mutations, particularly involving the NF-κB signaling cascade. These observations indicate that EBV represents one of several alternative mechanisms that rescues BCR-negative germinal center B cells and promotes HRS cell survival [34].

Table 1.

EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders by WHO classifi cation

WHO Classification, 5th edition WHO Classification, revised 4th edition
Large B-cell lymphomas
 EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, NOS
Lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas associated with immune deficiency and dysregulation
 EBV-positive mucocutaneous ulcer (same)
EBV-positive NK/T-cell lymphomas
 EBV-positive nodal T- and NK-cell lymphoma Not previously included
 Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma Extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal-type
EBV-positive T- and NK-cell lymphoid proliferations and lymphomas of childhood
 Severe mosquito bite allergy (same)
 Hydroa vacciniforme lymphoproliferative disorder Hydroa vacciniforme-like lymphoproliferative disorder
 Systemic chronic active EBV disease

Chronic active EBV infection of T- and NK-cell type,

systemic form

 Systemic form Systemic EBV-positive T-cell lymphoma of childhood (same)
Mesenchymal dendritic cell neoplasms
 EBV-positive inflammatory follicular dendritic cell sarcoma Inflammatory pseudotumour-like follicular/fibroblastic dendritic cell sarcoma

Excerpt from “The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms” [29]

Clinical implications of EBV in lymphoma

EBV-positive lymphomas have fewer driver mutations than EBV-negative cases, especially in genes involved in apoptosis. A recent study comparing the genomic and transcriptomic characteristics of endemic Burkitt lymphoma cases from Uganda and sporadic cases from the United States showed that activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AICDA) activity was much higher in endemic Burkitt lymphoma cases. Increased AICDA activity is reportedly associated with fewer driver mutations [31]. This indicates that EBV-induced immunomodulation plays a role in oncogenesis with a relatively low mutational burden.

Various studies have shown that persistent and high titers of EBV have prognostic significance. In a study of EBV-positive Hodgkin lymphoma, the plasma EBV-DNA viral load correlated with tumor burden, decreasing with chemotherapy but increasing with relapse [35]. It has been reported that plasma EBV-DNA is highly concordant with viral nucleic acid in situ hybridization on tissue sections in Hodgkin lymphoma. Pretreatment plasma EBV positivity was reported to be an independent predictor of treatment failure, and EBV positivity after treatment was related to failure-free survival in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma [36]. The prognosis according to EBV positivity has also been reported for other lymphomas. A multinational study conducted in South Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore on extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma showed that the post-treatment Deauville score and EBV-DNA positivity were independently associated with progression-free survival and overall survival [37].

Treatment of EBV-associated lymphoma

Different combinations of chemotherapy regimens are used, depending on the lymphoma subtype. Nevertheless, for EBV-positive lymphoma, targeting EBV is expected to improve treatment outcomes. Based on the understanding of EBV lifecycle and oncogenesis, several treatment approaches have been proposed.

During latency, the viral genome persists as episomes in the nucleus and only a limited number of viral genes are expressed. The EBV becomes resistant to nucleoside-type antivirals because the viral enzyme thymidine kinase, which is a target of many antiviral drugs, is not expressed during latency. Consequently, the concept of inducing EBV-infected cell death by promoting the reactivation of EBV from latent to lytic replication, referred to as the lytic induction treatment, has been proposed. An early study on combined treatment with ganciclovir and arginine butyrate, which can induce EBV-thymidine kinase expression during latency, showed an anti-tumor response [38]. EBV reactivation can help control EBV-associated diseases for several reasons. First, EBV reactivation directly induces apoptosis. Upon EBV reactivation, an intrinsic response to cellular injury is triggered, activating NF‐κB and IRF3 signaling, which facilitates apoptosis [39]. Quercetin, a licorice flavonoid, can induce EBV lytic proteins through mechanisms involving the heat shock response and the MAPK/extracellular signal-regulated kinase and MAPK/JNK pathways [40]. MYC is a protein associated with Burkitt lymphoma and is essential for maintaining EBV latency. Disruption of MYC expression by CBL0137 induces EBV reactivation [41].

Epigenetic modification is another method for EBV lytic induction. A preclinical study showed that decitabine induces the expression of viral antigens in a Burkitt lymphoma xenograft model. Treatment of EBV-positive Burkitt lymphoma cells with decitabine, followed by treatment with EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes, resulted in T cell homing to tumors and inhibition of tumor growth, highlighting the epigenetic factors required to maintain latency in EBV-infected cells [42]. A recent phase 1b/2 study of recurrent EBV-positive lymphoid malignancies treated with nanatinostat (a hydroxamic acid-based class I-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor) and valganciclovir in patients without viable curative treatment options showed a 40% overall response rate, with a median response of 10.4 months [43].

Another approach for treating EBV-associated lymphoma is immune checkpoint inhibition. A preclinical study reported that following EBV infection of naïve B cells, PD-L1 and PD-L2 protein expression are upregulated. PD-L1 blocking with the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, pembrolizumab, resulted in more efficient killing of EBV-infected B cells by EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes [44]. Furthermore, a positive response was observed when a combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy was administered to patients with refractory EBV -associated DLBCL who exhibited resistance to first-line immunochemotherapy regimens [45].

Adoptive T cell therapy, the therapeutic transfer of defined T cell immunity, offers great potential for the treatment of challenging viral infections owing to its high specificity for tumor cells and low off-target toxicity. Both autologous and third-party EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes have been considered for difficult-to-treat EBV infections.

A multinational phase II study involving an autologous EBV-specific T cell product (baltaleucel T) for advanced, relapsed extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma showed anticancer activity with an overall response rate of 50% [46]. A more recent global phase 3 trial of off-the-shelf EBV-specific cell therapy for relapsed/refractory EBV-positive PTLD reported excellent survival outcomes, with 50% of the patients achieving an objective response and 100% overall survival at one year [47].

Another approach involves the use of an EBV vaccine; potential targets include gp350, gp42, gH-gL, EBNA1, LMP1, and LMP2. Among the various targets, a monoclonal antibody targeting EBV gp42 has been reported to be effective in preventing lymphomas [48].

Conclusion

EBV plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of lymphoma, and its mechanisms vary according to the specific subtype. Nevertheless, EBV serves as a valuable predictor of disease activity and prognosis in various lymphoma types. Notably, EBV is characterized by its latent capacity, which suggests that lytic induction can enhance treatment efficacy. In challenging cases of EBV-associated lymphoma, the development of EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy and vaccines is essential.

Author’s contributions

Ju HY wrote and revised the main manuscript text.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding support.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Damania B, Kenney SC, Raab-Traub N. Epstein-Barr virus: biology and clinical disease. Cell. 2022;185(20):3652–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Epstein MA, Achong BG, Barr YM. Virus particles in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt’s lymphoma. Lancet. 1964;1(7335):702–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Epstein MA, Henle G, Achong BG, Barr YM. Morphological and biological studies on a virus in cultured lymphoblasts from Burkitt’s lymphoma. J Exp Med. 1965;121(5):761–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thorley-Lawson DA, Gross A. Persistence of the Epstein-Barr virus and the origins of associated lymphomas. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(13):1328–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ressing ME, van Gent M, Gram AM, Hooykaas MJ, Piersma SJ, Wiertz EJ. Immune evasion by Epstein-Barr virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2015;391:355–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Guo R, Gewurz BE. Epigenetic control of the Epstein-Barr lifecycle. Curr Opin Virol. 2022;52:78–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Munz C. Epstein-Barr virus pathogenesis and emerging control strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2025;23(10):667–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Martel C, Georges D, Bray F, Ferlay J, Clifford GM. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: a worldwide incidence analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e180–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wong Y, Meehan MT, Burrows SR, Doolan DL, Miles JJ. Estimating the global burden of Epstein-Barr virus-related cancers. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022;148(1):31–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Robbiani DF, Deroubaix S, Feldhahn N, Oliveira TY, Callen E, Wang Q, et al. Plasmodium Infection Promotes Genomic Instability and AID-Dependent B Cell Lymphoma. Cell. 2015;162(4):727–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Moormann AM, Heller KN, Chelimo K, Embury P, Ploutz-Snyder R, Otieno JA, et al. Children with endemic Burkitt lymphoma are deficient in EBNA1-specific IFN-gamma T cell responses. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(7):1721–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Moormann AM, Chelimo K, Sumba OP, Lutzke ML, Ploutz-Snyder R, Newton D, et al. Exposure to holoendemic malaria results in elevated Epstein-Barr virus loads in children. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(8):1233–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McHugh D, Myburgh R, Caduff N, Spohn M, Kok YL, Keller CW, et al. EBV renders B cells susceptible to HIV-1 in humanized mice. Life Sci Alliance. 2020;3(8):e202000640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Shannon-Lowe C, Rickinson A. The global landscape of EBV-associated tumors. Front Oncol. 2019;9:713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sausen DG, Basith A, Muqeemuddin S. EBV and Lymphomagenesis. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(7). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 16.Chiu YF, Ponlachantra K, Sugden B. How Epstein Barr Virus Causes Lymphomas. Viruses. 2024;16(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 17.Jiang J, Zhu X, Li S, Yan Q, Ma J. Building a bridge between the mechanism of EBV reactivation and the treatment of EBV-associated cancers. J Med Virol. 2025;97(2):e70192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marques-Piubelli ML, Salas YI, Pachas C, Becker-Hecker R, Vega F, Miranda RN. Epstein-barr virus-associated B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders and lymphomas: a review. Pathology. 2020;52(1):40–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vereide DT, Seto E, Chiu YF, Hayes M, Tagawa T, Grundhoff A, et al. Epstein-barr virus maintains lymphomas via its miRNAs. Oncogene. 2014;33(10):1258–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Noh KW, Park J, Kang MS. Targeted disruption of EBNA1 in EBV-infected cells attenuated cell growth. BMB Rep. 2016;49(4):226–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang X, Li J, Dong K, Lin F, Long M, Ouyang Y, et al. Tumor suppressor miR-34a targets PD-L1 and functions as a potential immunotherapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Signal. 2015;27(3):443–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stelling A, Hashwah H, Bertram K, Manz MG, Tzankov A, Muller A. The tumor suppressive TGF-beta/SMAD1/S1PR2 signaling axis is recurrently inactivated in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2018;131(20):2235–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nagel S, Uphoff CC, Dirks WG, Pommerenke C, Meyer C, Drexler HG. Epstein-barr virus (EBV) activates NKL homeobox gene HLX in DLBCL. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0216898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Montes-Moreno S, Odqvist L, Diaz-Perez JA, Lopez AB, de Villambrosia SG, Mazorra F, et al. EBV-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the elderly is an aggressive post-germinal center B-cell neoplasm characterized by prominent nuclear factor-kB activation. Mod Pathol. 2012;25(7):968–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vockerodt M, Morgan SL, Kuo M, Wei W, Chukwuma MB, Arrand JR, et al. The Epstein-Barr virus oncoprotein, latent membrane protein-1, reprograms germinal centre B cells towards a Hodgkin’s Reed-Sternberg-like phenotype. J Pathol. 2008;216(1):83–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Aravinth SP, Rajendran S, Li Y, Wu M, Yi Wong AH, Schwarz H. Epstein-Barr virus-encoded LMP1 induces ectopic CD137 expression on Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells via the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway. Leuk Lymphoma. 2019;60(11):2697–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Incrocci R, McAloon J, Montesano M, Bardahl J, Vagvala S, Stone A, et al. Epstein-Barr virus LMP2A utilizes Syk and PI3K to activate NF-kappaB in B-cell lymphomas to increase MIP-1alpha production. J Med Virol. 2019;91(5):845–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mundo L, Del Porro L, Granai M, Siciliano MC, Mancini V, Santi R, et al. Frequent traces of EBV infection in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas classified as EBV-negative by routine methods: expanding the landscape of EBV-related lymphomas. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(12):2407–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Alaggio R, Amador C, Anagnostopoulos I, Attygalle AD, Araujo IBO, Berti E, et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms. Leukemia. 2022;36(7):1720–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 30.Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J, et al. World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting-Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(12):3835–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grande BM, Gerhard DS, Jiang A, Griner NB, Abramson JS, Alexander TB, et al. Genome-wide discovery of somatic coding and noncoding mutations in pediatric endemic and sporadic Burkitt lymphoma. Blood. 2019;133(12):1313–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Panea RI, Love CL, Shingleton JR, Reddy A, Bailey JA, Moormann AM, et al. The whole-genome landscape of Burkitt lymphoma subtypes. Blood. 2019;134(19):1598–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Greenough A, Dave SS. New clues to the molecular pathogenesis of Burkitt lymphoma revealed through next-generation sequencing. Curr Opin Hematol. 2014;21(4):326–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Murray PG, Young LS. An etiological role for the Epstein-Barr virus in the pathogenesis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2019;134(7):591–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Spacek M, Hubacek P, Markova J, Zajac M, Vernerova Z, Kamaradova K, et al. Plasma EBV-DNA monitoring in Epstein-Barr virus-positive Hodgkin lymphoma patients. APMIS. 2011;119(1):10–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kanakry JA, Li H, Gellert LL, Lemas MV, Hsieh WS, Hong F, et al. Plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA predicts outcome in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma: correlative analysis from a large North American cooperative group trial. Blood. 2013;121(18):3547–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kim SJ, Choi JY, Hyun SH, Ki CS, Oh D, Ahn YC, et al. Risk stratification on the basis of Deauville score on PET-CT and the presence of Epstein-Barr virus DNA after completion of primary treatment for extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type: a multicentre, retrospective analysis. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2(2):e66-74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perrine SP, Hermine O, Small T, Suarez F, O’Reilly R, Boulad F, et al. A phase 1/2 trial of arginine butyrate and ganciclovir in patients with Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphoid malignancies. Blood. 2007;109(6):2571–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.SoRelle ED, Haynes LE, Willard KA, Chang B, Ch’ng J, Christofk H, et al. Epstein-Barr virus reactivation induces divergent abortive, reprogrammed, and host shutoff states by lytic progression. PLoS Pathog. 2024;20(10):e1012341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Lee M, Son M, Ryu E, Shin YS, Kim JG, Kang BW, et al. Quercetin-induced apoptosis prevents EBV infection. Oncotarget. 2015;6(14):12603–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Guo R, Jiang C, Zhang Y, Govande A, Trudeau SJ, Chen F, et al. MYC Controls the Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Switch. Mol Cell. 2020;78(4):653–69 e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 42.Dalton T, Doubrovina E, Pankov D, Reynolds R, Scholze H, Selvakumar A, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming sensitizes immunologically silent EBV+ lymphomas to virus-directed immunotherapy. Blood. 2020;135(21):1870–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Haverkos B, Alpdogan O, Baiocchi R, Brammer JE, Feldman TA, Capra M, et al. Targeted therapy with nanatinostat and valganciclovir in recurrent EBV-positive lymphoid malignancies: a phase 1b/2 study. Blood Adv. 2023;7(20):6339–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Bednarska K, Chowdhury R, Tobin JWD, Swain F, Keane C, Boyle S, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-associated lymphomas decoded. Br J Haematol. 2024;204(2):415–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Li Y, Wu Y, Cao S, Yu B, Zhang Q, Xia Z, et al. PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for refractory EBV-positive DLBCL: a retrospective analysis. Blood Res. 2024;59(1):36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kim WS, Oki Y, Kim SJ, Yoon SE, Ardeshna KM, Lin Y, et al. Autologous EBV-specific T cell treatment results in sustained responses in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T lymphoma: results of a multicenter study. Ann Hematol. 2021;100(10):2529–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mahadeo KM, Baiocchi R, Beitinjaneh A, Chaganti S, Choquet S, Dierickx D, et al. Tabelecleucel for allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell or solid organ transplant recipients with Epstein-Barr virus-positive post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after failure of rituximab or rituximab and chemotherapy (ALLELE): a phase 3, multicentre, open-label trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25(3):376–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bu W, Kumar A, Board NL, Kim J, Dowdell K, Zhang S, et al. Epstein-Barr virus gp42 antibodies reveal sites of vulnerability for receptor binding and fusion to B cells. Immunity. 2024;57(3):559–73 e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.


Articles from Blood Research are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES