Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 25;2(4):557–565. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neh138

Table 1.

CHIS-CAM and CHIS 2001 sample characteristics (unweighted n, weighted %)

n CHIS-CAM (%) CHIS 2001 (%)
Gender
    Male 3668 48.5 48.8
    Female 5519 51.5 51.2
    Total 9187 100 100
Age
    18–35a 1545 32.0 37.2
    36–50 3073 32.6 31.3
    51–64 2352 19.6 17.1
    65+ 2216 15.9 14.4
    Total 9186 100 100
Race
    White 3660 55.5 55.8
    Latino 2267 23.8 23.7
    Asian-American and Pacific Islander 1336 11.4 11.3
    African-American 961 5.8 5.8
    Others 963 3.1 3.1
    Total 9187 100 100
Rural/urban
    Urban 3155 40.5 41.1
    Second city 2150 18.9 18.8
    Suburban 1957 28.7 27.9
    Small town–exurban 919 7.2 7.3
    Rural 996 4.7 4.8
    Total 9187 100 100
Poverty
    0–99% 1313 13.0 14.2
    100–199% 1903 18.2 19.7
    200–299% 1330 12.9 14.3
    300% and above 4641 55.9 51.9
    Total 9187 100 100
Education
    Less than high school 1571 14.7 15.7
    Grade 12/HS diploma 2154 24.3 26.3
    Some college 2511 26.1 27.1
    College graduate or more 2951 34.8 30.9
    Total 9187 100 100
Insurance
    Insured 8052 85.2 84.3
    Not insured 1135 14.8 15.7
    Total 9187 100 100
Health status
    Chronic illness, no cancerb 4951 57.5
    No chronic illnessb 2392 35.3
    Cancer 1844 7.2 6.4
    Total 9187 100

aThere are no respondents aged 18 or 19 in the CHIS-CAM data.

bThere is no comparable measure for chronic illness status in CHIS 2001.