Skip to main content
. 2026 Feb 7;26:472. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-07727-7

Table 6.

Performance comparison of hybrid CNN-Based models for dental condition detection

Model Dental Condition F1-Score Precision Recall Accuracy
CNN + DT Cavity 0.793 ± 0.028 0.789 ± 0.019 0.798 ± 0.026 0.812 ± 0.029
Fillings 0.823 ± 0.022 0.834 ± 0.032 0.812 ± 0.024 0.812 ± 0.029
Impacted Tooth 0.788 ± 0.025 0.784 ± 0.018 0.792 ± 0.026 0.812 ± 0.029
Implant 0.788 ± 0.030 0.801 ± 0.024 0.776 ± 0.026 0.812 ± 0.029
Macro Average 0.798 ± 0.026 0.802 ± 0.023 0.795 ± 0.025 0.812 ± 0.029
CNN + RF Cavity 0.828 ± 0.021 0.823 ± 0.027 0.834 ± 0.023 0.854 ± 0.023
Fillings 0.860 ± 0.033 0.876 ± 0.022 0.845 ± 0.039 0.854 ± 0.023
Impacted Tooth 0.854 ± 0.037 0.848 ± 0.029 0.859 ± 0.020 0.854 ± 0.023
Implant 0.828 ± 0.030 0.839 ± 0.016 0.817 ± 0.037 0.854 ± 0.023
Macro Average 0.843 ± 0.028 0.847 ± 0.024 0.839 ± 0.030 0.854 ± 0.023
CNN + SVM Cavity 0.749 ± 0.019 0.745 ± 0.025 0.754 ± 0.032 0.786 ± 0.031
Fillings 0.787 ± 0.022 0.798 ± 0.024 0.776 ± 0.036 0.786 ± 0.031
Impacted Tooth 0.759 ± 0.034 0.748 ± 0.034 0.771 ± 0.039 0.786 ± 0.031
Implant 0.755 ± 0.019 0.762 ± 0.027 0.748 ± 0.023 0.786 ± 0.031
Macro Average 0.763 ± 0.024 0.763 ± 0.028 0.762 ± 0.033 0.786 ± 0.031