Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Mar 13.
Published in final edited form as: Proc Des Med Devices Conf. 2025 May 24;2025:10.1115/dmd2025-1021. doi: 10.1115/dmd2025-1021

TABLE 2:

CHANGE IN ACCEPTABILITY OF INTERVENTION MEASURE (AIM), FEASIBILITY OF INTERVENTION MEASURE (FIM), AND MOBILE APPLICATION RATING SCALE (MARS) ACROSS ITERATIONS.

Score
AIM
  Prototype 1 Mean 4.4
  Prototype 2 Mean+ 4.4
  Change Score 0.0
FIM
  Prototype 1 Mean 4.2
  Prototype 2 Mean+ 4.5
  Change Score 0.3
MARS
 Section A: Engagement
  Prototype 1 Mean 4.0
  Prototype 2 Mean+ 4.0
  Change Score 0.0
 Section B: Functionality
  Prototype 1 Mean 4.2
  Prototype 2 Mean+ 4.3
  Change Score 0.1
 Section C: Aesthetics
  Prototype 1 Mean 4.2
  Prototype 2 Mean+ 4.2
  Change Score 0.0
 Section E: App Subjective Quality
  Prototype 1 Mean 4.0
  Prototype 2 Mean+ 4.2
  Change Score 0.2
 Section F: App-Specific
  Prototype 1 Mean 4.2
  Prototype 2 Mean+ 4.1
  Change Score −0.1

Note: AIM: Acceptibility of Intervention Measure, FIM: Feasiblity of Intervention Measure, MARS: Mobile Application Rating Scale. MARS Section D (Information, e.g., app store description, use in published scientific research) was omitted due to the development phase of this work.

+

11 of 12 participant responses to date.