Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2026 Mar 12;21(3):e0336416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336416

AI adoption in E-commerce enterprises: Insights into current practices and future directions from an interview study

Tong Zhu 1,*, Mohd Zaidi Abd Rozan 2
Editor: Baogui Xin3
PMCID: PMC12981462  PMID: 41818198

Abstract

With the accelerated integration of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in digital commerce, e-commerce businesses are showing a diversified trend in its application across processes such as marketing, operations, and customer services. This article, based on the TOE (Technology-Organization-Environment) model and the TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) framework, employs a multi-case qualitative interview approach to conduct semi-structured interviews with different types of e-commerce enterprises in Anhui Province, China. It explores their practical implementation paths, feedback on effects, and future plans regarding AI technology adoption. The research findings are as follows: First, AI applications have covered the entire chain of e-commerce operations, including content generation, advertising placement, data analysis, customer service management, and logistics scheduling; however, small and micro enterprises still face significant limitations in technical depth and customization capabilities. Second, while the effects of AI applications are emerging, most processes continue to rely heavily on human collaboration and supervision, resulting in a human-machine collaboration model of “AI pre-processing + human fine-tuning.” Third, the organizational capabilities of enterprises and the AI literacy of employees are key to adoption, while the external policy environment has yet to provide effective guidance. Fourth, enterprises exhibit a stratified integration pattern in AI deployment, ranging from ‘platform-bound’ to ‘tool-augmented’ to ‘self-developed’ models, reflecting significant dynamic variations across different organizational contexts. This study also provides a new theoretical perspective and empirical evidence for understanding the technology adoption logic and digital transformation practices in the AI-driven e-commerce industry.

Introduction

In recent years, the rapid advancement of digital technology has led to the widespread integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across various facets of e-commerce. AI has become a crucial tool for companies seeking to optimize operational efficiency, enhance user experience, and enable intelligent decision-making [1]. Whether in product content generation, advertising placement, or key processes such as customer service, data analysis, and intelligent logistics, AI technology has demonstrated significant empowering potential for e-commerce enterprises. These enterprises encompass diverse forms, including platform-based merchants, self-operated stores, cross-border e-commerce, and live-streaming e-commerce, all conducting commercial transactions on digital platforms through internet technology [2].

However, existing studies reveal that enterprises differ substantially in how AI technologies are applied, integrated, and embedded into e-commerce operations, particularly across firms of different sizes and digital capacities [3]. Although prior research has documented the performance benefits of AI adoption and examined user-level acceptance mechanisms, much of the literature remains either technology-centric, emphasizing efficiency gains, or behavior-centric, focusing on individual adoption intentions [4,5]. Relatively less attention has been paid to how e-commerce enterprises, in practice, deploy AI across different platforms and business processes, evaluate its application outcomes, and adjust usage strategies under concrete platform, organizational, and environmental conditions. As a result, existing research provides limited insight into the diversity of AI application patterns observed across different types of e-commerce enterprises, particularly regarding how operational processes, perceived application effects, and contextual constraints jointly shape AI adoption and use over time.

To address this gap, this study adopts the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) framework and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as complementary analytical perspectives. The TOE framework provides a structural lens for examining the technological conditions, organizational resources, and environmental contexts that shape AI deployment in e-commerce enterprises, while TAM contributes a perceptual lens for understanding how enterprises evaluate the usefulness and usability of AI applications in practice. By integrating these perspectives, this study conceptualizes AI adoption as a multidimensional process shaped by the interaction of technological arrangements, organizational conditions, environmental influences, and enterprise-level perceptions of application effectiveness. Drawing on in-depth interviews with e-commerce enterprises in Anhui Province, this study explores how firms understand, deploy, and adjust AI technologies in real-world business settings. Specifically, the research revolves around the following questions:

  1. How are AI technologies currently applied by e-commerce enterprises of different sizes within their business processes, and what are their specific models and technology acquisition channels?

  2. How do enterprises perceive the effects of AI technologies in actual operations, including the specific aspects where efficiency or value is demonstrated?

  3. What factors influence enterprises’ adoption of AI, and what challenges do enterprises face in the process of integrating AI?

  4. Looking ahead, what are enterprises’ plans, needs, and expectations regarding AI applications?

By systematically examining AI adoption from an enterprise perspective, this study contributes to a more nuanced understanding of digital transformation in e-commerce. It clarifies how AI technologies are operationalized across heterogeneous organizational contexts and offers empirical insights that inform both theory development and practical decision-making for policymakers and technology service providers.

Literature review

Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology is profoundly transforming the field of e-commerce, with applications becoming increasingly widespread in areas such as marketing, supply chain management, and customer service. In this study, AI specifically refers to digital systems and tools that incorporate machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision, or other algorithmic techniques to support and enhance commercial activities conducted via online platforms. To comprehensively understand the current state of AI applications in e-commerce enterprises, this study synthesizes relevant research findings through a literature review, aiming to provide theoretical support for subsequent empirical research.

AI adoption in E-commerce

Artificial intelligence technology enables businesses to achieve their goals by accurately analyzing complex and ambiguous external data to uncover commercial value, thereby driving the intelligent development of e-commerce companies [6]. In the context of e-commerce, artificial intelligence primarily refers to the use of systems and tools that incorporate AI technologies or algorithms to support online product or service-related business activities [7]. Currently, AI technology is widely applied across various fields, including image search, chatbots, cybersecurity, data interpretation, predictive analytics, and operations management [1].

AI has been extensively applied across the e-commerce value chain. In marketing and customer interaction, AI-driven content generation, chatbots, and personalized recommendations have significantly enhanced e-commerce performance by improving both customer engagement and conversion rates [4,8]. In e-commerce logistics operations, predictive analytics and intelligent scheduling improve the consistency of the supply chain, as well as the collaboration and coordination of logistics [9]. In security and infrastructure, AI supports cybersecurity systems and real-time threat detection, which is particularly beneficial for SMEs through scalable services such as SecaaS [10]. Furthermore, AI-driven data analytics and decision support systems enable businesses to extract actionable insights and optimize platform strategies [11].

From a functional perspective, AI adoption in e-commerce can be categorized into four key domains: customer engagement (such as virtual assistants), operational optimization (such as demand forecasting), intelligent decision-making (such as pricing and inventory models), and risk management (such as fraud detection) [3,11,12]. Each domain reflects varying levels of technological intensity and organizational adaptation [13]. Moreover, enterprises can implement artificial intelligence through multiple channels, including AI resources embedded within e-commerce platforms, API or module integration, and in-house development [14]. This indicates that AI adoption in e-commerce is not uniform but occurs through diverse configurations and integration pathways.

While AI's presence in e-commerce is increasing, the depth and customization of its adoption exhibit significant variations across different enterprise types and digital ecosystems [15]. Multidisciplinary perspectives emphasize that AI diffusion across enterprises is mediated by organizational readiness, regulatory environments, and ecosystem dependencies, resulting in differentiated adoption trajectories rather than homogeneous implementation outcomes [16]. Large-scale industry surveys similarly report that, although the overall rate of AI adoption continues to increase, the tangible benefits of AI remain concentrated among a limited group of enterprises that are able to scale and integrate AI more deeply into their operations [17]. In contrast, small and medium-sized enterprises tend to rely on standardized, platform-based, or third-party AI solutions due to constraints in resources, technical expertise, and data infrastructure, resulting in more limited and function-specific applications [18]. Together, these studies highlight that AI adoption in e-commerce is inherently layered, shaped by firm size, digital readiness, and contextual conditions, rather than representing a uniform technological adoption across enterprises.

TOE & TAM in AI adoption

Current research on organizations adopting artificial intelligence mainly relies on established models such as the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) [13]. The TOE framework provides a macro-level perspective by emphasizing how technological characteristics, organizational readiness, and environmental conditions jointly shape firms’ technology adoption decisions, while TAM focuses on the cognitive mechanisms through which users evaluate and accept new technologies. By combining these two perspectives, it is possible to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of AI adoption that incorporates both contextual conditions and evaluative perceptions [19].

The informatization foundation of enterprises is an essential prerequisite for the adoption of artificial intelligence technology [20]. Along with technological capabilities, it determines the depth and breadth of an enterprise's mastery of AI technology and critically influences the complexity of the AI technologies planned for implementation [21]. Furthermore, the maturity of AI technology tools is a necessary condition for encouraging enterprises to adopt AI [22]. The implementation costs and complexity of AI technology directly affect an enterprise's ability to successfully integrate AI into its business functions [23].

Larger organizations possess greater human and financial resources, which often enable them to derive more significant benefits from the use of artificial intelligence technology [20]. Additionally, organizational compatibility plays a crucial role in AI adoption, with flexible organizational adaptability being more conducive to coordinating innovative technologies [19]. Strong leadership support, along with the technological awareness and endorsement of senior management, can substantially accelerate an organization's adoption of artificial intelligence and effectively overcome resistance to technological change [19,24]. Furthermore, internal technical training, project collaboration, and the establishment of dedicated AI teams can reduce implementation challenges and enhance the organization's overall adaptability. [25].

Due to differences in the countries where they are located, technological systems, national innovation systems, and the supportive or obstructive frameworks influencing enterprises’ adoption and use of artificial intelligence technology can vary [20]. Given the resource constraints faced by small and medium-sized enterprises, the use of artificial intelligence technology requires additional government support [26]. Additionally, market pressures from competitors and partners, along with business pressures arising from the growing demand for customer personalization, are important external driving forces that determine whether enterprises adopt artificial intelligence technology [27].

Perceived usefulness generally denotes the degree to which the utilization of a specific technology enhances work performance, whereas perceived ease of use relates to how effortless the operation of that technology is perceived to be [28]. Expectations regarding the advantages, anticipated benefits, and convenience offered by artificial intelligence technology can motivate small and medium-sized enterprises to adopt new technological innovations [29]. Moreover, the adoption of artificial intelligence is significantly influenced by perceived usefulness, while perceived ease of use does not play a decisive role [28]. Perceived security in electronic transactions is a direct determinant of technological willingness and the implementation of e-commerce [30]. Additionally, existing compelling business cases serve as credible sources for adopting new technologies, thereby enhancing trust in the effectiveness and reliability of artificial intelligence technology [22].

The TOE framework captures the technological, organizational, and environmental contexts that shape AI adoption, while TAM explains the cognitive mechanisms through which technologies are evaluated and accepted. Although TAM was originally developed for individual users, in organizational settings technology adoption decisions often emerge from collective managerial evaluations, in which perceived usefulness and ease of use reflect shared organizational judgments rather than individual attitudes. Accordingly, this study integrates TAM into the TOE framework through an organizational perception lens, linking external contextual conditions with enterprises’ internal cognitive evaluations and adoption behaviors. TOE is used to structure the technological, organizational, and environmental contexts surrounding AI adoption, whereas TAM is incorporated to interpret how enterprises collectively assess the usefulness and applicability of AI technologies. This integration enables a more nuanced understanding of AI adoption as both a context-dependent and perception-driven organizational process. At the same time, relying on a single framework may provide only a partial explanation for organizational AI adoption, particularly in platform-based and data-intensive environments such as e-commerce. TOE emphasizes structural conditions but does not explicate how enterprises internally interpret technological value, while TAM centers on evaluation mechanisms without modeling organizational resources or environmental constraints. The combined use of TOE and TAM thus offers an analytically balanced approach that connects contextual conditions with organizational-level perceptions, while situating the analysis at the level of enterprise adoption decisions, rather than modeling broader inter-organizational dynamics or long-term capability evolution.

Challenges and future trends of AI in E-commerce

Artificial intelligence has become an indispensable component of the e-commerce environment [31]. However, the application of AI technology in e-commerce practices still faces both challenges and opportunities [32]. Limited human and financial resources are considered the primary bottlenecks for companies developing AI solutions [33]. Consequently, larger enterprises have a greater advantage in the use of artificial intelligence technology compared to small businesses [20]. Furthermore, critical factors such as the maturity of a company's IT infrastructure, data quality, and internal skill sets directly influence the feasibility of implementing AI technology [22]. Additionally, the knowledge gap resulting from a lack of understanding and awareness contributes to skepticism and resistance toward AI adoption among companies [3].

With the surge in artificial intelligence applications in e-commerce, data privacy, security compliance, and ethical concerns have become critical issues that must be addressed [31]. Data breaches, misuse, and non-compliance with regulations can impede the adoption of artificial intelligence [3]. Additionally, biased data may produce biased outcomes, leading to unfair treatment of customers in e-commerce [3,34]. This not only damages the reputation of businesses but can also result in legal and social responsibility challenges.

By actively addressing these challenges, e-commerce platforms can better establish trust with users and promote a fair and equitable consumption experience [32]. Simultaneously, artificial intelligence offers unique opportunities for new e-commerce markets to transcend traditional retail models [31]. Particularly in areas such as personalized recommendations, intelligent customer service, and supply chain optimization, AI technology is reshaping the competitive landscape of e-commerce [6]. With the increasing prevalence of artificial intelligence and declining costs, the comprehensive adoption of AI will become more widespread and efficient [33]. The future development of e-commerce needs to find a delicate balance between technological innovation and responsible AI usage to ensure the dual realization of commercial value and social responsibility [31].

Limitations of literature research

Despite extensive research currently being conducted on the application of artificial intelligence in e-commerce, covering various dimensions such as intelligent recommendations, automated customer service, and advertising optimization, the existing literature still shows significant shortcomings in terms of theoretical perspectives, research subjects, and methodological approaches.

From a theoretical perspective, although the TOE and TAM models are widely referenced in research on AI technology adoption, most literature focuses on a single dimension, lacking a systematic understanding that integrates different dimensions and the interplay of multiple factors. This makes it difficult to fully reveal the dynamic interaction logic among technology, organization, and environment. Regarding research subjects, existing studies predominantly examine AI practices in large enterprises or platform providers, often overlooking the actual application pathways and strategic adjustments of small and medium-sized e-commerce enterprises, which operate under resource constraints and limited capabilities. This leads to a bias in research conclusions, resulting in an “overestimation of adoption levels and underestimation of real challenges.” From a methodological perspective, a large number of current studies rely on quantitative models, which can depict trends and tendencies in technology adoption but struggle to capture the detailed challenges and strategies faced by enterprises at the operational level, lacking a practical perspective that is “embedded in processes.”

Therefore, the existing literature on the core issue of “how AI is truly deployed in e-commerce processes” continues to reflect a dual bias of “technological optimism” and “operational blind spots.” There is an urgent need for supplementary and corrective research that involves various types of enterprises and employs qualitative methods to engage with real-world scenarios. This study aims to address this academic gap by focusing on the frontline perspective of enterprises and exploring the real pathways and evolutionary logic of the integration of AI and e-commerce processes.

Methodology

This study employs qualitative research methods and develops a theoretical analytical framework based on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). It takes into account four dimensions: technological characteristics, organizational capabilities, external environment, and user perception, providing a systematic support for explaining enterprises’ AI adoption behavior. From a business perspective, the study comprehensively examines the current application status, effects, and future adoption intentions of AI technology among e-commerce companies, aiming to reveal the application characteristics and real challenges of AI technology in the field of e-commerce.

Sample selection and research context

In the selection of research subjects, this study employs a quota sampling strategy to ensure diversity and analytical comparability across enterprise types. Eight e-commerce companies from Anhui Province were selected, including two large, two medium, two small, and two micro enterprises, enabling systematic comparison of AI application patterns across different organizational scales. The sampled enterprises cover multiple e-commerce formats, including live-streaming e-commerce, domestic platform-based e-commerce, cross-border e-commerce, and hybrid models that combine online and offline operations. They also vary in industry background and operational complexity, reflecting heterogeneous technological contexts, organizational capacities, and environmental conditions. The basic profiles of the interviewed enterprises—including business type, scale, platform orientation, and key characteristics—are summarized in Table 1, providing a structured basis for cross-case analysis.

Table 1. Profile of Interviewed E-commerce Enterprises.

Enterprise Code Firm Size Industry Business Type Experience (Years) Key Characteristics
E1 Large E-commerce sales Cross-border E-commerce 7 years Data-intensive operation with multi-platform global reach and high automation demand.
E2 Large Tea Live streaming

E-commerce
5 years With short videos as the orientation and multi-platform live streaming as the core.
E3 Medium Pharmaceutical Domestic

E-commerce
4 years Offline–online integration in a highly regulated industry with multi-platform operations.
E4 Medium Kitchen Supplies Hybrid

E-commerce
5 years Domestic and cross-border retail across multiple platforms in a highly competitive market.
E5 Small Snack Foods Domestic

E-commerce
4 years Multi-store operation on price-sensitive platforms in high-frequency consumer goods.
E6 Small Building Materials Cross-border E-commerce 7 years Cross-border sales via both independent website and international platforms.
E7 Micro Thermos Cup Cross-border E-commerce 6 years Vertically integrated production and sales across platforms and independent channels.
E8 Micro General Merchandise Domestic

E-commerce
5 years Small-scale retail across several domestic platforms with platform-dependent operations.

Anhui Province has experienced rapid growth in its e-commerce sector in recent years, with total e-commerce sales reaching a level above the national average. As a representative province in central China, Anhui reflects both emerging digital transformation dynamics and typical structural constraints faced by many Chinese e-commerce enterprises, thereby providing a meaningful empirical context for exploring AI adoption patterns with broader analytical relevance.

Interview design and data collection

For data collection, this study utilized semi-structured interviews with leader of e-commerce operations departments in each enterprise. The interviews were designed to capture in-depth insights into enterprises’ primary e-commerce platforms, AI applications across core e-commerce processes, perceived effectiveness of AI use, environmental and organizational influences on adoption, and future planning for AI deployment, thereby aligning data collection with the analytical structure of this study.

To ensure the focus and depth of the interview data collection, this study designed and utilized an interview outline consisting of four main questions (Appendix), arranged in a specific order. Each question includes several sub-questions to prevent respondents from straying off-topic and to obtain more structured and informative answers. To ensure theoretical consistency and construct validity, the four main interview questions were mapped to the dimensions of the TOE and TAM frameworks. Specifically, the question on current application status corresponds primarily to the technological context of TOE, exploring the types and integration of AI technologies. The application effectiveness question reflects perceived usefulness and ease of use in TAM, but at the organizational level, focusing on firms’ overall evaluations of AI benefits. The influencing factors question links to the organizational and environmental dimensions of TOE, examining internal resources and external pressures. Finally, the future plans and expectations question integrates all three TOE dimensions to explore enterprises’ strategic intentions and technology evolution paths.

The interview outline was developed based on the TOE and TAM theoretical frameworks and was refined following a round of pre-test interviews to ensure the clarity and relevance of the questions. Interview questions concerning perceived usefulness and ease of use were designed to capture organizational-level perceptions rather than individual attitudes, thereby aligning TAM constructs with enterprise decision-making processes. The data collection process employed a quota sampling strategy across different enterprise size categories and continued until a preliminary level of theoretical saturation was achieved, with no substantially new themes emerging in the final interviews. This indicated that the key constructs related to AI adoption in e-commerce had been thoroughly explored within the scope of the study.

Ethical considerations

All interview procedures complied with established ethical standards for social science research. Prior to data collection, each participant was informed of the study’s purpose, the voluntary nature of participation, and the confidentiality and anonymization of all responses. Verbal informed consent was obtained from all participants before the interviews, which were conducted between March and July 2025. Consent was documented by the interviewer through audio recording at the beginning of each interview and noted in the interview records.

No personal identifiers or sensitive individual information were collected, and all transcripts were anonymized at the enterprise and individual levels. The study involved professional interviews with enterprise representatives and did not collect personal, medical, or vulnerable population data. Based on institutional guidelines, this type of research did not require formal institutional review board (IRB) approval. All data were stored securely and used solely for academic research purposes.

Data analysis and research rigor

The coding process followed a thematic analysis approach using a hybrid strategy that integrated inductive and deductive procedures [35]. In the initial stage, open coding was conducted across all interview transcripts to identify recurring concepts, practices, and expressions related to AI adoption in e-commerce operations. These initial codes were derived directly from the data and reflected participants’ descriptions of platforms, applications, perceived effects, and contextual influences. At this stage, no predefined categories were imposed, allowing patterns such as “platform reliance,” “manual verification,” and “tool integration pathways” to emerge from participants’ own language.

In the subsequent stage, related codes were systematically organized into higher-order themes through axial coding, enabling the consolidation of patterns across enterprises of different sizes. During this phase, the TOE framework and TAM were introduced as sensitizing concepts rather than rigid coding templates [36]. Emerging themes were iteratively compared with the dimensions of Technology, Organization, Environment, and Perceived Usefulness to examine how empirically grounded patterns aligned with, extended, or nuanced these theoretical constructs. For example, inductively generated codes related to “free platform tools,” “paid plug-ins,” and “in-house systems” were synthesized into the theme “application pathways,” which was then analytically linked to the technological and organizational dimensions of TOE.

To enhance analytical rigor and minimize confirmation bias, several measures were implemented. First, coding decisions were continuously compared across cases and enterprise sizes to identify convergent and divergent patterns. Themes were retained only when supported by evidence from multiple enterprises, while boundary cases and contradictory views were explicitly examined to refine category definitions. Second, a member-checking procedure was applied, whereby interview summaries were returned to selected participants for confirmation of factual accuracy. Third, a second researcher conducted an independent review of the coding structure and thematic interpretations.

Through these procedures, the study sought to improve the credibility, dependability, and transparency of the qualitative analysis. The final coding structure and thematic framework derived from NVivo analysis are presented in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Structure for Thematic Codes from Interview Data in Nvivo15.

Fig 1

Interview data findings & analysis

To maintain the focus of the research and facilitate a structured analysis and comparison of interview data, this study categorizes and organizes the interview content by theme. These themes primarily include: the main e-commerce platforms used by the enterprises; specific applications of artificial intelligence technology in e-commerce processes; pathways and modes of AI implementation; organizational influencing factors; external environmental factors; the actual effects following AI adoption; and the enterprises’ plans for future AI applications. Based on these themes, this article systematically summarizes and analyzes the interview data (Table 2).

Table 2. Interview Quotes Supporting AI Adoption Analysis in E-commerce.

Theme Supportive quotes
Main Platforms ‘Online, we have five major sections: Douyin, JD, PDD, Kuaishou, and WeChat Channel. (Interviewee #E2)’, ‘We mainly engage in online cross-border business, with two platforms: an independent site and Alibaba International Site. (Interviewee #E6)’
AI Application Areas ‘This section mainly involves copywriting, as we need to create some operational titles, subtitles, and marketing phrases. Additionally, we will write some advertising copy during the advertising flow process. (Interviewee #E8)’, ‘The keywords for the advertising product, and the specific amount of money to invest, will have a suggestion on the platform that you can follow for your investment. It will also analyze which advertising phrases for this product might be better. (Interviewee #E7)’, ‘Sometimes I use AI to send my requests to it, asking it to help me filter out the key information and output the table for me. (Interviewee #E5)’
Application Pathways and Modes ‘Besides using the systems like Amazon’s backend and DeepSeek for basic data analysis, our company has also developed our own tool specifically for optimizing the display of Amazon front-end. (Interviewee #E1)’, ‘Besides the AI provided by Amazon, we also use SellerSprite and Lingxing. These two aren’t built into the platform, so we have to pay to use them. (Interviewee #E4)’, ‘Other than third-party free AIs like DeepSeek, all the AI tools we use are built-in platform features. (Interviewee #E5)’, ‘Except for the platform's ad placement, all the other tools we use right now is basically free. (Interviewee #E8)’

‘For things like product titles and descriptions, we run them through DeepSeek to translate them into the local language. The error rate is actually pretty low, but we still have someone double-check everything manually, just in case. (Interviewee #E1)’, ‘The platform provides us with the keywords and the exact budget needed for ad placement. and we’ll sometimes just follow those recommendations when we launch a campaign. (Interviewee #E7)’
Observed Effects ‘Amazon has its own built-in AI, which I have used before for generating images. You input a command, and it produces images quite quickly. I feel that the calculations it makes seem a bit too rough, the profits they calculate are higher than I expected. It will be much better than the words you find yourself because the words they recommend have a high level of relevance. (Interviewee # E7)’, ‘During the promotion process, sales and conversion rates increased by about 10%, but it is not very high. (Interviewee # E5)’, ‘It can provide us with a framework that is only for reference and not operational. Ultimately, it still relies on our sales personnel to do the advertising themselves. […] these market analysis tools are quite effective. (Interviewee # E1)’, ‘I think it will help reduce the workload a bit. However, some actual ideas or product choices, as well as certain marketing techniques, still require human involvement. (Interviewee # E6)’
Environmental and Organizational Influences ‘I think the biggest issue with using AI is its tuning. You need to fine-tune it accurately, feed it the right terms, and getting it to produce the correct video takes a considerable amount of time. Additionally, the learning curve is quite steep; some aspects may involve coding issues. It requires a lot of time to learn how to use it and how to operate it. (Interviewee # E2)’, ‘Our current advertising data monitoring relies entirely on manual efforts, basically requiring us to keep an eye on it during working hours. […] we have not yet looked into any policies from the government or industry associations. (Interviewee # E8)’, ‘The management has not considered artificial intelligence at all. […] they are aware of its existence, but it is not included in the company's strategic planning. (Interviewee # E3)’, ‘Sales satisfaction mainly depends on your product and its quality. […] as far as I know, I haven't heard of any policies or subsidies related to this. (Interviewee # E6)’
Future Plans for AI ‘I hope it can make further progress in that image processing, helping me achieve things that some graphic designers can't. The program doesn't need to be too complicated; it should be simple and fast, allowing me to use it easily and quickly see results. (Interviewee # E6)’, ‘What we are looking forward to is that he can quickly help us handle some matters, optimize some of our operational processes, simplify things a bit, and then when we use them, they can bring us better results. (Interviewee # E5)’, ‘They will consider costs and also the issue of waiting and observing. First, they might look at some other companies, which may yield better operational results, and then they will consider integrating. (Interviewee # E7)’

The main platform of enterprise e-commerce

The interview results indicate that e-commerce enterprises of different sizes exhibit diverse characteristics in platform selection, involving various categories such as traditional e-commerce, cross-border e-commerce, mobile e-commerce, and social/live-streaming e-commerce. Regarding traditional e-commerce platforms, companies typically choose mainstream B2C and C2C platforms like Taobao, Tmall, JD.com, and Pinduoduo. In cross-border e-commerce, some companies opt for platforms like Amazon, Temu, Shopify independent sites, and Alibaba International Site, which primarily target the global market. For mobile e-commerce, some enterprises utilize Alipay Mini-Program Engine stores to establish their online sales channels. Additionally, social and live-streaming e-commerce have become significant channels for an increasing number of companies. Some businesses actively engage on short video and live-streaming platforms such as Douyin, Kuaishou, and WeChat Channel, Channels, content marketing and interactive experiences to enhance consumer purchasing intentions. Notably, instant retail platforms like Meituan and Ele.me have also appeared appeared the operational scope of these enterprises, indicating that some e-commerce companies are exploring localized O2O models to enhance enhance experience through instant delivery and meet the demand for fast consumption.

AI applications in E-commerce processes

Artificial intelligence technology has been widely applied across multiple core areas of e-commerce businesses, primarily including product content generation and optimization, advertising placement, data analysis, customer service automation, logistics management, and others (Fig 2). As shown in Fig 2, the values indicate how many enterprises reported using AI in each domain. Since individual firms typically adopt AI across multiple functions, these frequencies reflect the relative prevalence of different application areas. Companies generally utilize AI to optimize product titles, descriptions, images, and videos, thereby enhancing content quality and appeal. Additionally, advertising placement has become a key area for AI applications, which not only includes automated placement and intelligent matching but also involves precise traffic analysis to help businesses optimize promotional effectiveness. Data analysis is an important support for AI applications, encompassing operational data, advertising keywords, traffic sources, and competitor analysis, providing data-driven decision support for businesses to formulate operational strategies. Companies also employ AI-powered customer service systems to achieve automatic responses, monitor return rates, and facilitate intelligent interactions, thereby improving customer service efficiency. In logistics management, AI technology supports inventory management, smart delivery, and anomaly detection. Some companies use AI to monitor data on competitors’ platforms, allowing them to promptly adjust their operational strategies. Overall, AI technology has become deeply integrated into the entire e-commerce process, with companies of various sizes are exploring more efficient and intelligent AI application models to improve operational efficiency and competitive advantage.

Fig 2. The main application areas of artificial intelligence in the e-commerce process.

Fig 2

Application pathways and modes of AI use

Large enterprises typically construct multi-layered application architectures that combine platform-native AI functions, third-party tools, and internally developed systems. This hybrid mode allows them to customize algorithms, integrate cross-platform data, and embed AI deeply into decision-making and operational workflows. In contrast, small and micro enterprises predominantly rely on standardized AI services embedded within e-commerce platforms, such as intelligent pricing, keyword optimization, and traffic recommendation tools. These “platform-bound” pathways lower technical and financial barriers, enabling rapid adoption but limiting the depth of customization. Medium-sized enterprises occupy an intermediate position: while they remain dependent on platform ecosystems, they demonstrate a greater willingness and capacity to invest in paid external tools. Across cases, AI deployment follows a platform-centered integration pattern complemented by external tools. Enterprises of different sizes adopt free services, paid solutions, or self-developed systems according to their resource endowments, resulting in a stratified and dynamically adaptive adoption process.

Alongside these differentiated integration pathways, enterprises consistently described a human–machine collaboration mode characterized as “AI pre-processing + human fine-tuning.” AI is widely used to perform repetitive and standardized tasks, including drafting product descriptions, generating advertising materials, providing first-round customer responses, and producing analytical reports. Human operators then refine outputs, ensure contextual relevance, and conduct judgment-intensive activities such as compliance checks, product selection, and strategic adjustments. This collaborative configuration allows firms to improve efficiency while maintaining control over quality and risk. Rather than replacing human labor, AI functions as an augmentative layer embedded within existing workflows, reshaping task boundaries and redistributing cognitive effort.

Effectiveness of AI applications

The application of artificial intelligence technology in e-commerce companies has generally enhanced work efficiency and reduced operational costs, though certain limitations remain. In content generation, AI can accelerate the production of copywriting, images, and videos, thereby reducing human labor. This capability has been particularly valuable, especially in situations with limited human resources. However, the accuracy, creativity, and compliance of AI-generated content still require improvement. Companies generally report that AI-generated copywriting may not fully or accurately describe products and may even risk violating advertising regulations, necessitating human review. Regarding advertising placement, AI technology has optimized placement strategies, improving the advertising production ratio and making promotional expenses more cost-effective. Nevertheless, some companies have noted that the advertising optimization suggestions provided by AI remain at a conceptual level and lack strong practical applicability, ultimately still requiring human decision-making and execution.

In the fields of data analysis and customer service automation, AI technology offers businesses more systematic and efficient analytical support, such as automatically organizing reports, optimizing advertising keywords, and analyzing market trends, making operational management more precise. However, some companies have pointed out that AI analysis may deviate from actual conditions, particularly in areas like profit estimation and customer satisfaction assessment, which still require human judgment. While automated customer service responses have increased response speed, many businesses believe that AI-driven customer service still requires human assistance and cannot fully replace human agents. In logistics management, AI's capabilities in inventory control, delivery optimization, and anomaly detection help companies improve supply chain efficiency. Overall, the application of AI in e-commerce has brought significant improvements in efficiency and cost optimization, but there remains potential for further advancements in the areas of content quality, advertising optimization, and data accuracy. Companies still need to combine human intervention to fully leverage the advantages of AI technology.

Environmental and organizational influences

In the process of applying artificial intelligence technology, the skill level of personnel within e-commerce companies is crucial for the effective use of AI. Many companies emphasize that employees’ proficiency with AI tools directly impacts outcomes such as writing instructions, adjusting parameters, and analyzing data. Additionally, most companies still rely on manual review processes, especially in areas like content generation, advertising placement, and customer service responses, to ensure accuracy and compliance. Furthermore, the attitudes and decisions of company managers also influence the depth of AI usage; some leaders adopt a wait-and-see approach or lack sufficient knowledge support, which hinders technology adoption. At the same time, many companies believe that the quality of the product itself and the service experience are the primary drivers of sales growth, leading to a relatively cautious investment in AI. Although some companies support the use of AI, they tend to maintain traditional operational frameworks and prefer to utilize AI as an auxiliary tool rather than a complete replacement for human labor.

At the external environment level, the surveyed companies generally showed little consideration for the impact of national or industry policies on the implementation of artificial intelligence applications. This suggests that, at this stage, policy-driven incentives for corporate AI adoption are relatively weak. In addition, some companies refer to the AI usage of their peers in the same industry and adopt a cautious attitude towards AI applications, preferring to observe the AI application results of their competitors before deciding whether to invest further. Consequently, current AI applications in the e-commerce industry are primarily driven by companies’ operational needs and internal management decisions, with external environmental factors exerting relatively limited influence.

Future planning for AI in E-commerce

Although most companies do not yet have clear investment plans for artificial intelligence technology, they have expressed potential needs and expectations for specific functions and tools. Generally, companies hope that AI can play a greater role in enhancing the intelligence of customer service, optimizing the quality of content generation, improving the depth and accuracy of data analysis, and achieving system integration across platforms. Many respondents mentioned that current AI tools mostly provide framework suggestions, lacking specificity and operability, and they hope for more constructive analysis and actionable recommendations in the future. Additionally, companies expect AI to provide more efficient and precise support tools at critical operational points such as product selection, marketing strategy optimization, customer relationship management, and customer feedback management, thereby truly achieving cost reduction and efficiency improvements.

The future planning and investment in AI technology by enterprises are influenced by multiple factors, including business strategy, financial capacity, and industry characteristics. Some large companies have regarded AI applications as an important direction for the future and plan to strengthen development in areas such as smart logistics, market analysis, and data integration, although they also express some uncertainty. Meanwhile, small and medium-sized enterprises tend to gradually integrate AI functions based on their existing foundations. Most of these companies are in a state of “observing the effects on peers and assessing cost-effectiveness,” planning to cautiously advance the application of AI technology according to their own development stage and resource availability.

Discussion & comparative analysis

Based on the analysis of interview data, this article further reveals the similarities and differences between the practical applications of AI in enterprises and existing research. Through comparative analysis, it clarifies the specific contributions of this study in terms of theoretical validation and empirical supplementation, and explores the structural challenges and transformation pathways of AI empowerment in e-commerce.

Summary of key findings

  • (1) The diversification of platform operations drives the differentiation of AI application demands.

The diversification of platform operations in e-commerce enterprises has driven differentiated demands for AI technology applications. The operational logic, content standards, and marketing mechanisms established by various platforms form the foundation for the distinct application of artificial intelligence tools by enterprises. Cross-border e-commerce platforms such as Amazon and Shopify emphasize language adaptation, content standardization, and precise advertising matching, leading enterprises to rely more heavily on AI for multilingual copywriting, image and text generation optimization, and automated advertising recommendations. In contrast, domestic comprehensive platforms like Taobao, JD.com, and Pinduoduo focus on differentiated product presentation and precise recommendations driven by big data, prompting enterprises to prefer using AI to assist with content optimization, keyword matching, and operational data analysis within platform rules. With the rise of live-streaming e-commerce platforms such as Douyin and Kuaishou, some enterprises are increasingly focusing on AI-driven video generation and optimization to enhance traffic acquisition and conversion efficiency. The diversification of platform operations not only broadens the application scenarios for AI but also profoundly influences enterprises’ decision-making processes regarding the selection, deployment, and investment strategies for AI tools.

  • (2) AI applications cover the entire chain of the e-commerce process, but the depth and customization still need to be improved

Currently, e-commerce companies have widely adopted artificial intelligence technologies across various domains, including product content optimization, advertising placement, customer service, data analysis, and logistics management. This has enabled preliminary full-chain technical coverage of e-commerce operations. Especially in high-frequency tasks like product copy generation, image processing, and intelligent customer service, AI tools have significantly improved efficiency and reduced the burden on human resources, becoming an important auxiliary force in daily operations. However, in practice, the use of AI tools still faces challenges related to insufficient depth and limited customization. Many respondents reported that existing AI tools can offer general framework suggestions but lack specificity, detail, and platform adaptability, often requiring substantial manual modifications and reviews, particularly in meeting platform content standards, user personalization requirements, and industry-specific regulations, which AI remains unable to fully deliver. This disconnect between technology capabilities and practical demands restricts the evolution of AI from being merely a “tool” to “decision support” or “process replacement.”

Especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, the high costs of technology development, the complexity of tool usage, and the lack of technical support teams often limit them to using only open-source or free tools, which offer restricted functionality. This makes it challenging for SMEs to systematically integrate and customize solutions according to their own business processes. This situation of “technology existing but difficult to align with the capabilities and scenarios of enterprises” leads SMEs remaining at a superficial level of AI usage, unable to achieve genuine business upgrades driven by AI. Although AI has initially been recognized for its perceived ease of use and usefulness, the gap between actual user experience and expected benefits affects the likelihood of its continued adoption and expanded application. Therefore, to promote high-quality AI applications in e-commerce, it is necessary not only to continuously optimize the technology itself but also to focus on building a matching mechanism between personalized enterprise scenarios and technical solutions.

  • (3) The effects of AI applications are beginning to emerge, but they still depend on human collaboration and supervision

E-commerce companies generally believe that current AI applications have played a preliminary role in improving operational efficiency, content generation, advertising placement, and customer service. However, these companies emphasize that the application of AI has limitations and dependencies: whether it is the accuracy of generated content, the practicality of advertising placement suggestions, or the intelligence of customer service responses, the results produced by AI still face challenges such as generalization, lack of contextual understanding, and an inability to fully meet actual needs. This situation means that AI functions more as a “collaborative tool” rather than a “replacement tool,” requiring human cooperation, review, and correction.

The mechanism of “human-machine collaboration” reflects that current AI technology has not yet matured to the level of fully autonomously executing complex e-commerce tasks. Companies typically implement manual intervention processes at critical stages such as content review, customer interaction, and strategy execution to avoid risks such as low-quality AI-generated content, platform violations, and misinformation. Especially in areas like compliance with advertising laws, professional product descriptions, and diverse customer communications, AI still lacks the ability for contextual judgment and logical reasoning, requiring human judgment to achieve “precise output.” Additionally, many small and medium-sized enterprises, constrained by limited technical capabilities and understanding of platform regulations, must rely on experience and manual judgment to verify AI-generated suggestions, further increasing the workload on personnel (Fig 3). Overall, the application of AI in e-commerce remains at the “assisted intelligence” stage, and its collaboration with humans remains a key guarantee for achieving actual results.

Fig 3. AI-Human Collaborative Workflow in E-commerce.

Fig 3

  • (4) Organizational capability and AI literacy within enterprises have become key factors driving adoption, whereas external policy support remains insufficient

Although some enterprises have introduced AI tools, limited employee capability in using these technologies and insufficient managerial understanding often restrict AI to superficial applications, preventing it from delivering meaningful organizational empowerment. As a result, the functions of AI are confined to superficial applications and fail to achieve genuine empowerment. Additionally, the “default templated output” generated by AI systems requires employees to exercise judgment and optimization skills; without these, there is a risk of producing outputs that do not align with the company's product style or platform rules. This disparity in AI literacy significantly influences the company's perception of AI's usefulness and its willingness to adopt the technology.

At the same time, most enterprises demonstrate a lack of attention to policy guidance and industry support when assessing the external environment. Almost all interviewed companies did not proactively mention national or local policies promoting AI + e-commerce, nor did they consider policy dividends as an external driving force for AI adoption. This phenomenon reveals a weakening of the environmental dimension within the TOE framework and indicates that current AI adoption primarily depends on the internal capabilities of enterprises rather than external drivers. It also suggests that policymakers, in promoting the integration of “AI + e-commerce” in the future, can transform the external environment from “potential” to “explicit supportive force” through demonstration projects, policy guidance, and other strategies.

  • (5) The deployment of AI technology demonstrates a dynamic adaptation mechanism and a paradigm of human-machine collaboration

The current integration of AI technology within e-commerce processes exhibits significant dynamic layering characteristics and human-machine collaboration models. As illustrated in Fig 4, this study anchors AI adoption in a platform-centered architecture supplemented by external tools. However, enterprises follow differentiated paths according to their scale, technological capacity, and resource endowment. Micro and small firms display largely similar patterns, relying primarily on platform-embedded AI functions and a limited number of low-cost or free tools. Medium-sized enterprises, while still operating within a “platform + third-party tools” structure, demonstrate a higher level of investment in paid AI services and cross-platform management systems, reflecting a transitional stage of capability expansion. Large enterprises further extend this architecture by incorporating self-developed AI solutions, forming a three-layer structure of “platform core + external tools + self-developed” that enables deeper integration and refined operational control. This stratified deployment challenges the traditional “one-size-fits-all” assumption of technology adoption. Instead, it suggests that the depth and form of AI integration in e-commerce are shaped by enterprises’ evolving resource conditions and organizational capacities and are better understood as a process of personalized and adaptive alignment rather than generalized application.

Fig 4. Enterprise AI Integration Model in E-commerce.

Fig 4

Simultaneously, the application of AI technology is driving the re-engineering and reconstruction of e-commerce processes. Companies are generally developing a collaborative work paradigm of “AI pre-processing + human fine-tuning.” In areas such as drafting initial copy, designing advertising materials, and providing rapid customer service responses, AI takes on standardized and repetitive tasks, while humans focus on high-value creative work, including product selection and compliance judgment. This model not only enhances operational efficiency but also significantly reduces labor costs, all while ensuring the professionalism and compliance of the content. Therefore, the integration of AI is not merely a replacement through automation, but rather a symbiotic mechanism that complements human capabilities, demonstrating a dual-track collaborative approach of technology embedding and human support in practical operations.

Comparative analysis: Interview findings vs. literature review

This study compares firsthand interview data with existing literature, not only validating the applicability of certain theoretical perspectives but also revealing the limitations of current research when confronted with real-world complexities.

In terms of theoretical validation, this study confirms the fundamental effectiveness of the TOE and TAM theoretical frameworks in explaining the adoption behavior of AI technology within enterprises. Feedback from company interviews regarding the “perceived usefulness” and “ease of use” of artificial intelligence closely aligns with the core concepts of the TAM model. Simultaneously, variations in companies’ technological adaptability, internal organizational capabilities, and perceptions of the external environment also resonate with the core logic of the three dimensions—“Technology-Organization-Environment”—in the TOE model. This confirms that applying these two models in the e-commerce context has a robust theoretical foundation and strong explanatory power.

However, existing literature often assumes that AI technology is a relatively standardized and replicable technical solution applicable to all types of enterprises [37,38]. This study finds that, in practice, there are significant layered integration patterns in AI applications. Large enterprises tend to build a composite technical system of “platform core + external tools + self-developed” solutions, whereas small and medium-sized enterprises typically adopt a “platform-bound” lightweight integration model. This distinction challenges the traditional “one-size-fits-all” adoption assumption in the literature and suggests that researchers should thoroughly consider the actual disparities in organizational capabilities and digital infrastructure when exploring technology adoption.

Although the literature generally emphasizes the important role of external environmental factors, such as policy guidance and industry pressure, in technology diffusion [26,28], interviews revealed that most of the interviewed companies have very limited attention to national or industry policies, and the actual impact of institutional factors is often overestimated. This finding suggests that the current institutional environment's incentive mechanisms for promoting AI applications are not yet fully effective, and there may be biases in how policy variables are represented in research. Future studies should focus more on the institutional signals that companies “perceive” rather than on the “existing” institutional frameworks.

Finally, in terms of the collaboration mechanism between AI and human labor, this study proposes a collaborative paradigm of “AI preprocessing + human fine-tuning,” revealing the realistic path where AI is more likely to serve as an enhancement tool rather than a complete replacement within e-commerce enterprises. This finding offers a significant response to the prevailing “substitutive narrative” [39,40] and serves as a foundational reference for constructing more practical AI deployment models in the future.

Theoretical implications

First, while the TOE and TAM frameworks provide a valid foundation for understanding enterprise-level AI adoption, our findings suggest the need to move beyond static constructs. The evidence of differentiated AI integration paths—namely, “platform-bound adoption,” “external tool enhancement,” and “autonomous system development”—indicates that technology assimilation is a dynamic, staged process. Therefore, this research constructs a “Enterprise AI Integration Model in E-commerce” revealing the phased and differential characteristics of enterprises in technology deployment. This model dynamically supplements the “technological dimension” in TOE theory, emphasizing the non-linearity of the technology adoption process and the matching of organizational conditions.

Second, our discovery of the “AI pre-processing + human refinement” collaboration model introduces a complementary human-machine interaction paradigm. Rather than viewing AI as a replacement, our findings support the concept of AI as an augmentative partner. This contributes to recent theoretical shifts toward co-adaptive technology use, in which AI and human labor are jointly configured based on task complexity and risk. It also highlights the importance of micro-level coordination mechanisms, which have been underexplored in current technology adoption theories.

Conclusion

This study is based on the TOE framework and the TAM theory. Through interviews and research on e-commerce enterprises of different sizes, it systematically outlines the current application status of artificial intelligence technology in e-commerce processes, evaluates its effects, examines the environmental and organizational influencing factors, and discusses future development plans. The aim is to reveal the true nature of the integration of AI technology with e-commerce operations and the challenges it faces.

Research has found that artificial intelligence has gradually been integrated into various processes within e-commerce companies, including product content generation, advertising placement, customer service automation, and data analysis, resulting in a relatively complete coverage of the value chain. However, there are still significant shortcomings in depth and customization. Small and micro enterprises, constrained by costs and technical barriers, primarily adopt a platform-bound integration approach, lacking autonomy and flexibility. AI technology has shown initial effectiveness in improving efficiency and reducing human workload, but most applications still require human collaboration and subsequent review, revealing a misalignment between current technological capabilities and the actual operational needs of enterprises. At the organizational level, the AI literacy of employees and the willingness to adopt AI within the organization are key factors determining the effectiveness of AI deployment. Additionally, the lack of policy support and industry guidance in the external environment has led most enterprises to pay little attention to policy information or lack channels to access it, further affecting the acceptance of AI technology. Although large enterprises demonstrate strong strategic integration capabilities, small and micro enterprises tend to adopt a more cautious, wait-and-see attitude. However, research indicates that various types of enterprises generally hold an optimistic outlook on the future development of AI, particularly expressing strong potential demand in areas such as automation, intelligent recommendations, and data-driven decision-making.

In summary, the application of artificial intelligence in e-commerce is currently in a transitional phase of “from point to surface, from shallow to deep.” Enterprises exhibit distinct characteristics of layered integration and dynamic evolution in their acceptance and deployment of AI. In the future, it is necessary to further enhance the adaptability and usability of AI technologies in small and medium-sized enterprises, promote the implementation of supportive policies and industry guidelines, and improve AI awareness and operational capabilities within organizations through targeted training. These efforts will unlock greater potential for AI to empower high-quality development in e-commerce.

At the same time, this study has several limitations. First, the empirical evidence is drawn from a small number of enterprises within a single province, which may constrain the generalizability of the findings across different regions and institutional contexts. Second, as a qualitative study, the analysis relies on self-reported perceptions and experiences, which may be subject to recall bias or subjective interpretation. Third, the cross-sectional design captures AI adoption at a particular stage and cannot fully reflect its longitudinal evolution.

Future research could address these limitations by expanding the sample across multiple regions or countries, incorporating quantitative methods to test the proposed patterns and mechanisms, and adopting longitudinal designs to track the dynamic evolution of AI adoption over time. Additionally, further studies could examine sector-specific differences and explore how policy instruments and platform governance structures influence organizational AI trajectories. These efforts would deepen our understanding of AI-driven transformation in e-commerce and strengthen the theoretical and practical contributions of this research field.

Supporting information

S1 File. Interview questions.

(DOCX)

pone.0336416.s001.docx (15.9KB, docx)

Acknowledgments

None.

Data Availability

All data underlying the findings have been deposited in a stable public repository (Zenodo) and are freely accessible at: (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18298170). The dataset is fully anonymized and does not contain personal identifiers or sensitive information.

Funding Statement

This research is supported by the project “Application Research of Artificial Intelligence Technology in e-Commerce Enterprises in Anhui Province”, with Fund Number 2024AH052502. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Afroz Lari H, Vaishnava K, K S M. Artifical Intelligence in E-commerce: Applications, Implications and Challenges. Asian J Manag. 2022;13:235–44. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2022.00041 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Naunthong P. Understanding Characteristics of Organizations for E-Commerce Adoption in the New Normal Era. In: 2022 7th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR). 2022. p. 353–8. doi: 10.1109/icbir54589.2022.9786424 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rane N, Choudhary SP, Rane J. Acceptance of artificial intelligence technologies in business management, finance, and e-commerce: factors, challenges, and strategies. Stud Econ Bus Relat. 2024;5(2):23–44. doi: 10.48185/sebr.v5i2.1333 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Madanchian M. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Marketing on E-Commerce Sales. Systems. 2024;12(10):429. doi: 10.3390/systems12100429 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kelly S, Kaye S-A, Oviedo-Trespalacios O. What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telemat Inform. 2023;77:101925. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons. 2019;62(1):15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bawack RE, Wamba SF, Carillo KDA, Akter S. Artificial intelligence in E-Commerce: a bibliometric study and literature review. Electron Mark. 2022;32(1):297–338. doi: 10.1007/s12525-022-00537-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ingriana A, Rolando B. Revolutioning e-commerce: investigating the effectiveness of ai-driven personalization in influencing consumer purchasing behavior. JUMANAGE. 2025;4(1):549–65. doi: 10.33998/jumanage.2025.4.1.2040 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Malhotra G, Kharub M. Elevating logistics performance: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence in e-commerce. IJLM. 2024;36(1):290–321. doi: 10.1108/ijlm-01-2024-0046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mlakar I, Jeran P, Safran V, Logothetis V. A Cost-Effective Security Framework to protect micro enterprises: PALANTIR e-commerce use case. In: 2021 9th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS). 2021. p. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/isdfs52919.2021.9486359 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Oktaviani I, Purawanto E, Triana T. Analysis of AI-Based Big Data for Strategic Decision-Making in E-Commerce. In: Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Health, And Technology. 2024. p. 266–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Prasad KVS, Xavier LA, Jain S, Subba R, Mittal S, Anute N. AI-Driven Chatbots for E-Commerce Customer Support. In: 2024 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Applied Informatics (ACCAI). 2024. p. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/accai61061.2024.10602261 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hussain A, Rizwan R. Strategic AI adoption in SMEs: A prescriptive framework. arXiv. 2024. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.11825 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wei R, Pardo C. Artificial intelligence and SMEs: How can B2B SMEs leverage AI platforms to integrate AI technologies? Ind Mark Manag. 2022;107:466–83. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.10.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu T, Abd Rozan MZ. AI Technology Utilization Mapping for Small Medium Enterprises: An E-commerce Perspective. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci. 2024;14(12). doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i12/24152 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dwivedi YK, Hughes L, Ismagilova E, Aarts G, Coombs C, Crick T, et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management. 2021;57:101994. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McKinsey & Company. The state of AI in 2021: AI adoption on the rise, but benefits remain concentrated. McKinsey & Company; 2021. [cited 2025 Oct 24]. Available from: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/global-survey-the-state-of-ai-in-2021 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hansen EB, Bøgh S. Artificial intelligence and internet of things in small and medium-sized enterprises: A survey. J Manuf Syst. 2021;58:362–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.08.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chatterjee S, Rana NP, Dwivedi YK, Baabdullah AM. Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model. Tech Forecast Soc Change. 2021;170:120880. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kinkel S, Baumgartner M, Cherubini E. Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing – Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies. Technovation. 2022;110:102375. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Baabdullah AM, Alalwan AA, Slade EL, Raman R, Khatatneh KF. SMEs and artificial intelligence (AI): Antecedents and consequences of AI-based B2B practices. Ind Mark Manag. 2021;98:255–70. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.09.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schoeman F, Seymour LF. Understanding the low adoption of ai in south african medium sized organisations. Afr Inst Comput Sci Inf Technol. 2022;85:257–69. doi: 10.29007/c4rr [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Govori A, Sejdija Q. Future prospects and challenges of integrating artificial intelligence within the business practices of small and medium enterprises. J Gov Regul. 2023;12(2):176–83. doi: 10.22495/jgrv12i2art16 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hu C, Mohi Ud Din Q, Tahir A. Artificial Intelligence Symbolic Leadership in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: Enhancing Employee Flexibility and Technology Adoption. Systems. 2025;13(4):216. doi: 10.3390/systems13040216 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Weber M, Bulut E, Bies L, Greff T, Werth D. AI’s role in marketing for smes: knowledge, barriers and application potentials. In: 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Computer, Data Sciences and Applications (ACDSA). 2024. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/acdsa59508.2024.10467979 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Badghish S, Soomro YA. Artificial Intelligence Adoption by SMEs to Achieve Sustainable Business Performance: Application of Technology–Organization–Environment Framework. Sustainability. 2024;16(5):1864. doi: 10.3390/su16051864 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Su J, Zhang Y, Wu X. How market pressures and organizational readiness drive digital marketing adoption strategies’ evolution in small and medium enterprises. Tech Forecast Soc Change. 2023;193:122655. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122655 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Qu C, Kim E. Investigating AI Adoption, Knowledge Absorptive Capacity, and Open Innovation in Chinese Apparel MSMEs: An Extended TAM-TOE Model with PLS-SEM Analysis. Sustainability. 2025;17(5):1873. doi: 10.3390/su17051873 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ikumoro AO, Jawad MS. Intention to Use Intelligent Conversational Agents in e-Commerce among Malaysian SMEs: An Integrated Conceptual Framework Based on Tri-theories including Unified Theory of Acceptance, Use of Technology (UTAUT), and T-O-E. IJARBSS. 2019;9(11). doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i11/6544 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hoque ME, Susanto P, Shah NU, Khatimah H, Mamun AA. Does perceived behavioral control mediate customers’ innovativeness and continuance intention of e-money? The moderating role of perceived risk and e-security. Int J Emerg Mark. 2024;19(12):4481–502. doi: 10.1108/IJOEM-06-2022-0914 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Odeyemi O, Elufioye OA, Mhlongo NZ, Ifesinachi A. AI in E-commerce: Reviewing developments in the USA and their global influence. Int J Sci Res Arch. 2024;11(1):1460–8. doi: 10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0232 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Raji MA, Olodo HB, Oke TT, Addy WA, Ofodile OC, Oyewole AT. E-commerce and consumer behavior: A review of AI-powered personalization and market trends. GSC Adv Res Rev. 2024;18(3):066–77. doi: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.3.0090 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ulrich P, Frank V. Relevance and Adoption of AI technologies in German SMEs – Results from Survey-Based Research. Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;192:2152–9. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.228 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Narula S, Afaq A, Nagar S, Chaudhary M. Transformative Potential and Ethical Challenges of Generative AI in E-Commerce: Data Bias, Algorithm Bias. In: Responsible Implementations of Generative AI for Multidisciplinary Use. IGI Global; 2025. p. 317–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(1):80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bowen GA. Grounded Theory and Sensitizing Concepts. Int J Qual Methods. 2006;5(3):12–23. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500304 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brynjolfsson E, Mitchell T. What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science. 2017;358(6370):1530–4. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cockburn IM, Henderson R, Stern S. The impact of artificial intelligence on innovation: An exploratory analysis. The economics of artificial intelligence: An agenda. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2019. p. 115–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Frey CB, Osborne MA. The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Tech Forecast Soc Change. 2017;114:254–80. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Acemoglu D, Restrepo P. Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor. J Econ Perspect. 2019;33(2):3–30. doi: 10.1257/jep.33.2.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Baogui Xin

6 Jan 2026

Dear Dr. Zhu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I recommend that it should be revised taking into account the changes requested by the reviewers. Since the requested changes include valuable and constructive reviews, I would like to give you a chance to revise your manuscript. The revised manuscript will undergo the next round of review by same reviewers.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 20 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Baogui Xin, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the ethics statement in the Methods, you have specified that verbal consent was obtained. Please provide additional details regarding how this consent was documented and witnessed, and state whether this was approved by the IRB.

3. Thank you for stating in your Funding Statement:

[This research is supported by the project “Application Research of Artificial Intelligence Technology in e-Commerce Enterprises in Anhui Province”, with Fund Number 2024AH052502.].

Please provide an amended statement that declares *all* the funding or sources of support (whether external or internal to your organization) received during this study, as detailed online in our guide for authors at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submit-now. Please also include the statement “There was no additional external funding received for this study.” in your updated Funding Statement.

Please include your amended Funding Statement within your cover letter. We will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

[This research is supported by the project “Application Research of Artificial Intelligence Technology in e-Commerce Enterprises in Anhui Province ”, with Fund Number 2024AH052502.]

We note that you have provided funding information that is currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

[This research is supported by the project “Application Research of Artificial Intelligence Technology in e-Commerce Enterprises in Anhui Province”, with Fund Number 2024AH052502.]

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

6. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

7. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please move it to the Methods section and delete it from any other section. Please ensure that your ethics statement is included in your manuscript, as the ethics statement entered into the online submission form will not be published alongside your manuscript.

If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. Overall, the topic is timely and the study is potentially suitable for PLOS ONE, but my answers above reflect several areas where the reporting is not yet sufficiently clear to allow a confident judgement of technical rigor.

Regarding technical soundness and whether the data support the conclusions, the manuscript presents relevant interview evidence and includes useful quotations, but some higher-level claims and the proposed conceptual framing would be stronger if the link between the interview data and the conclusions were more explicit and consistently demonstrated across cases. At present, a number of interpretations appear reasonable, yet readers cannot always see a clear audit trail showing how specific themes and model components were derived from the coding process and supported across multiple enterprises, including any boundary cases or divergent views.

For the question on statistical analysis, my response reflects that this is primarily a qualitative interview study rather than a quantitative one. In this context, “rigor” depends on transparent and well-justified qualitative analytic procedures. The manuscript would benefit from a fuller description of how thematic analysis was conducted (e.g., whether coding was inductive, deductive, or hybrid), how the TOE and TAM frameworks were applied (as sensitizing concepts versus a formal coding frame), and what steps were taken to minimize confirmation bias and ensure analytic trustworthiness. The current level of detail is not yet sufficient for readers to evaluate the robustness of the analysis.

For data availability, the manuscript’s statements are not fully consistent and do not clearly indicate what underlying interview materials are available. PLOS ONE expects that data underlying the findings are accessible unless there is a justified ethical or legal restriction. For interview-based research, this typically requires either anonymised/appropriately redacted transcripts or a clearly described controlled-access pathway if public sharing is not possible. As currently written, it is difficult to determine what, if any, underlying data can be accessed to verify the findings.

On research ethics, the reporting also requires clarification. The manuscript notes verbal informed consent and suggests formal institutional ethics approval was not required, yet the submission information appears to indicate otherwise. Because this work involves human participants, the ethics pathway should be stated unambiguously, including whether there was ethics approval, exemption, or waiver, and how consent, confidentiality, data handling, and anonymisation were managed. Presenting these details clearly within the Methods section (not only in Declarations) would improve transparency and compliance with journal expectations.

Finally, the manuscript is generally intelligible in English, but it would benefit from careful language polishing to reduce ambiguity and improve precision. In addition, conclusions that suggest broader representativeness should be moderated given the small sample and single-province setting, and any quantitative-sounding improvements (e.g., percentage changes) should be clearly framed as participants’ estimates unless independently verified.

I did not identify clear evidence of dual publication from the materials available to me, but I recommend that the authors ensure the manuscript and any related outputs (e.g., conference proceedings, reports, or preprints) are appropriately disclosed according to journal policy. Overall, addressing the points above would significantly strengthen the manuscript’s methodological transparency, ethical reporting, and the credibility of its conclusions.

Reviewer #2: This study employs the TOE and TAM theoretical frameworks to explore the current application status, effectiveness, and challenges of AI technology through interviews with multiple e-commerce enterprises in Anhui Province. The research design is reasonable, the data is solid, and the findings offer certain insights. However, improvements are needed in theoretical depth, methodological rigor, and clarity of exposition.

1.Introduction Section:①The description of the research gap is somewhat broad and lacks systematic understanding. It does not precisely align with the design of this study.②The logical connection between the proposed multidimensional interaction of "technology-organization-environment-perception" and the integration of the TOE and TAM frameworks is unclear.

2.Literature Review:①It fails to review literature related to "stratified AI adoption," resulting in a lack of academic dialogue foundation for a core finding.②While it cites the TOE and TAM frameworks extensively, it lacks a critical discussion on how these two frameworks are combined at the organizational level. It is recommended to supplement the rationale for selecting these two frameworks, their complementarity, and their potential limitations in studying organizational AI adoption.

3.Methodology:①Sample information is incomplete. Details such as the industry type, revenue scale, and platform operation duration of the enterprises are missing.②The rationale for selecting Anhui Province is not provided. Can the level of e-commerce development in Anhui Province represent the general situation nationwide? A brief background explanation is needed to enhance the external validity of the sample.

4.Interview data findings & analysis:①A serious contradiction exists between Figure 2, where "Content Generation" accounts for only 6%, and the textual description in the results section stating that it is "widely and commonly used" by enterprises.

5.Discussion & Comparative Analysis:①The fifth key finding (dynamic adaptation mechanism) lacks a corresponding thematic section in the results, making its introduction in the discussion seem abrupt and poorly connected.②The comparison with literature lacks specific references. For instance, the claim that "existing literature assumes AI is a standardized solution" is not supported by citations to specific studies.

6.Conclusion:①The research limitations are not explicitly stated. It is recommended to supplement future research directions based on the gaps identified in this study.

7.Formatting and Details:Inconsistent formatting is present in the references section. Please strictly adhere to the journal's required style.

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

Attachment

Submitted filename: renamed_c1794.doc

pone.0336416.s002.doc (26.5KB, doc)
PLoS One. 2026 Mar 12;21(3):e0336416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336416.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 1


19 Jan 2026

Dear Editor and Reviewers,

Thank you very much for your time and effort in reviewing our manuscript titled " AI Adoption in E-commerce Enterprises: Insights into Current Practices and Future Directions from an Interview Study ". We truly appreciate the constructive comments and insightful suggestions provided by the reviewers, which have been immensely helpful in improving the quality and clarity of our paper.

We have carefully considered each of the points raised and have revised the manuscript accordingly. In the following sections, we provide a point-by-point response to the reviewers' comments. The changes in the revised manuscript have been highlighted using Red Color for your convenience.

Response to academic editor

1. The manuscript has been formatted in accordance with the requirements. However, the paragraph spacing has not been changed to double spacing for the sake of easier reading.

2. In this study, informed consent was obtained verbally from all participants prior to each interview. Before interview began, the interviewer explained the study purpose, voluntary nature of participation, confidentiality, and anonymization procedures using a standardized introductory script (see article Appendix). Participants were explicitly asked whether they agreed to participate and to be audio-recorded for academic research purposes. Participants’ agreement was captured on the audio recording at the beginning of each interview.

According to institutional guidelines, this study—based on professional interviews with enterprise representatives and involving no personal, medical, or vulnerable population data—was classified as minimal-risk social science research and did not require formal Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. This exemption applies to studies collecting non-sensitive professional opinions without personal identifiers. We have clarified this procedure in the Methodology section accordingly.

3. We have revised the Funding Statement in accordance with PLOS ONE’s requirements. The amended Funding Statement is provided below for your update of the submission system:

Funding Statement:

This research was supported by the project “Application Research of Artificial Intelligence Technology in E-Commerce Enterprises in Anhui Province” (Fund Number: 2024AH052502). There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funder had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

We confirm that no other institutional, commercial, or personal financial support was received during the conduct of this study.

4. We have removed all funding-related text from the Acknowledgments and all other sections of the manuscript, in accordance with PLOS ONE’s policy.

5. We confirm that our submission now includes the minimal data set required to replicate the findings of this qualitative study. We have deposited an anonymized dataset on Zenodo (DOI:10.5281/zenodo.18298170) containing a structured Excel file that summarizes all interview-derived evidence underlying the reported themes, figures, and conclusions. This dataset includes: The coded thematic summaries for each of the eight enterprises; The values used to construct all figures (such as, frequency of AI application domains, main platform); Metadata describing the operation and application status of the enterprise.

Full verbatim transcripts are not publicly shared due to ethical considerations and participant confidentiality. However, the deposited dataset represents the minimal de-identified data necessary to reproduce all analytical steps and results reported in the manuscript.

6. We have now finalized a data-sharing plan in accordance with PLOS ONE’s open data policy. All data underlying the findings have been deposited in a stable public repository (Zenodo) and are freely accessible at: (DOI:10.5281/zenodo.18298170). The dataset is fully anonymized and does not contain personal identifiers or sensitive information.

7. We have revised the manuscript to ensure that the ethics statement appears only in the Methodology section. All ethics-related text has been removed from any other sections of the manuscript.

Response to reviewer #1

1. We substantially strengthened the transparency of how interview data were transformed into themes and higher-level conclusions. First, we expanded the Methodology section to specify each step of the qualitative procedure, detailing how open codes were generated from raw transcripts, how they were aggregated into axial categories, and how these categories were mapped onto higher-order themes using TOE and TAM as sensitizing concepts. Second, in the Results section, we revised each thematic subsection to directly link major claims to their underlying codes and representative quotations from multiple enterprises. Third, we added summary tables that present enterprise profiles and the correspondence between codes, themes, and interview evidence. These tables provide a transparent basis for tracing how conclusions were grounded in the data.

2. In the revised manuscript, we substantially expanded the Methodology section to provide a transparent account of our qualitative procedures. We now specify that the thematic analysis followed a hybrid strategy, combining deductive and inductive coding. The TOE and TAM frameworks are explicitly described as sensitizing concepts guiding initial coding, while allowing new themes to emerge from the data. We further clarify how codes were developed, refined, and grouped into themes, and how these themes were linked to the analytical framework. To enhance trustworthiness, we detail the use of member checking, cross-review of coding by a second researcher. These additions enable readers to better evaluate the rigor, transparency, and robustness of the analytic process.

3. We have clarified the Data Availability Statement and now provide a de-identified dataset summarizing the interview materials as Supporting Information and in a public repository. This dataset constitutes the minimal data set required to reproduce all reported findings.

4. We have moved and expanded the ethics statement within the Methodology section. The revised text now explicitly describes the ethical pathway, including the use of verbal informed consent, how consent was documented (audio-recorded at the beginning of each interview), the anonymization procedures, data storage, and the basis for exemption from formal IRB review under institutional guidelines for professional, non-sensitive interviews. This ensures transparency and compliance with journal requirements.

5. We carefully edited the entire manuscript to improve clarity, precision, and readability in English. In addition, we added explicit statements in the ‘Sample Selection and Research Context’ section to clarify the limited sample size and the single-province setting, thereby tempering any unintended claims of broad representativeness. We also revised Figure 2 and its accompanying text to ensure that all quantitative-looking results are clearly presented as descriptive summaries of interview data.

Response to reviewer #2

1. Introduction Section

We have revised the Introduction to moderate the scope of the research gap and to ensure closer alignment with the study design. The revised version highlights the limited empirical insight into how AI applications are operationalized across platforms, processes, and enterprise contexts in e-commerce. The revised Introduction explains their complementary roles: TOE provides a structural perspective for examining technological, organizational, and environmental conditions, while TAM contributes a perceptual perspective for understanding how enterprises evaluate the effectiveness of AI applications in practice. This clarification supports the proposed multidimensional interaction of “technology–organization–environment–perception” and ensures a clearer alignment between the theoretical framework and the research design.

2. Literature Review

First, to respond to the absence of prior work on “stratified AI adoption,” we expanded Section ‘AI Adoption in E-commerce’ to incorporate multidisciplinary reviews, industry surveys, and SME-focused studies that document uneven and layered patterns of AI adoption across firms. The revised text now synthesizes evidence showing that AI diffusion and its benefits are distributed asymmetrically, shaped by firm size, digital readiness, and resource endowments.

Second, in response to the concern regarding the conceptual integration of TOE and TAM, we substantially revised Section ‘TOE & TAM in AI Adoption’. The revised section now explicitly clarifies:

(1) The rationale for selecting TOE and TAM—TOE captures structural and contextual conditions, while TAM explains evaluative perceptions shaping adoption;

(2) Their complementarity at the organizational level, where perceived usefulness and ease of use are interpreted as collective managerial evaluations rather than individual attitudes;

(3) Their analytical boundaries in organizational AI adoption research. We now explicitly acknowledge that TOE emphasizes contextual structures without explicating internal evaluation mechanisms, whereas TAM focuses on evaluative perceptions without modeling organizational resources or environmental constraints. The combined use of TOE and TAM is therefore positioned as an analytically balanced approach that links contextual conditions with organizational-level perceptions, while situating the analysis at the level of enterprise adoption decisions rather than broader inter-organizational dynamics or long-term capability evolution.

3. Methodology

We have revised the Methodology section to provide more complete and transparent sample information. A new table (Table 1) has been added to present the basic profiles of all interviewed enterprises, including business type, industry background, organizational scale, and key operational characteristics. This addition clarifies the heterogeneity of the sample and strengthens the basis for cross-case comparison.

In addition, we have expanded the description of the regional context to justify the selection of Anhui Province. The revised manuscript now explains that Anhui represents a transitional e-commerce environment with development indicators close to the national average, combining both emerging and mature digital practices. This positioning enhances the external validity of the study by situating the cases within a region that reflects common conditions faced by many Chinese e-commerce enterprises, rather than an extreme or atypical context.

4. Interview data findings & analysis

We have revised the figure by replacing the original pie chart with a bar chart to more accurately reflect the nature of the data. Because individual enterprises often apply AI across multiple functional areas, the values represent the number of enterprises that mentioned each application domain rather than proportional shares.

We have also added explicit textual clarification in Section ‘AI Applications in E-commerce Processes’ to explain the meaning of the figure and its statistical logic, emphasizing that the frequencies indicate the relative prevalence of AI use across domains.

5. Discussion & Comparative Analysis

(1) To address this issue, we have revised the structure of the Interview Data Findings & Analysis chapter by adding a new subsection ‘Application Pathways and Modes of AI Use’. This subsection is positioned before the analysis of application effectiveness and is explicitly grounded in interview evidence. It systematically reports how enterprises of different sizes integrate AI into their e-commerce operations Based on these findings, the fifth key point in the Discussion “The deployment of AI technology demonstrates a dynamic adaptation mechanism and a paradigm of human–machine collaboration” has been revised and now directly builds upon Section ‘Application Pathways and Modes of AI Use’. The discussion no longer introduces this concept in isolation but synthesizes patterns already identified in the Results. In addition, representative interview excerpts illustrating platform dependence, tool augmentation, and in-house development have been added to the interview summary table to strengthen the audit trail between data, themes, and conclusions.

(2) Based on your suggestions, we have added the missing references in Comparative Analysis: Interview Findings vs. Literature Review, and marked them.

6. Conclusion

We have revised the Conclusion section to explicitly articulate the limitations of the study, including the restricted sample scope, the qualitative and self-reported nature of the data, and the cross-sectional design. In addition, we have added a dedicated paragraph outlining concrete directions for future research, such as multi-regional expansion, mixed-methods validation, and longitudinal investigation of AI adoption.

7. Formatting and Details

By comparing with the formatting requirements, the references and other formats in the article were adjusted accordingly.

Once again, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers for their invaluable feedback. We believe the manuscript has been significantly strengthened through this revision process. We hope that the revised version meets the high standards of PLOS ONE. Please do not hesitate to contact us if any further clarification or additional modification is required. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Tong Zhu, Mohd Zaidi Abd Rozan

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0336416.s003.docx (26.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Baogui Xin

19 Feb 2026

Dear Dr. Zhu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

I recommend that it should be revised taking into account the changes requested by the reviewers. Since the requested changes include valuable and constructive reviews, I would like to give you a chance to revise your manuscript. The revised manuscript will undergo the next round of review by same reviewers.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 05 2026 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org . When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

  • A letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols . Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols .

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Baogui Xin, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Journal Requirements:

1. If the reviewer comments include a recommendation to cite specific previously published works, please review and evaluate these publications to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. There is no requirement to cite these works unless the editor has indicated otherwise.

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? -->?>

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available??>

The PLOS Data policy

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English??>

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

what does this mean? ). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

To ensure your figures meet our technical requirements, please review our figure guidelines: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures

You may also use PLOS’s free figure tool, NAAS, to help you prepare publication quality figures: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-tools-for-figure-preparation.

NAAS will assess whether your figures meet our technical requirements by comparing each figure against our figure specifications.

PLoS One. 2026 Mar 12;21(3):e0336416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0336416.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 2


21 Feb 2026

Dear Editor and Reviewers,

Thank you for your message and for the opportunity to submit the revised version of our manuscript. In this revision, we have carefully reviewed the manuscript in accordance with the journal’s requirements. Specifically:

1. We conducted a thorough check of the entire reference list to ensure completeness, formatting consistency, and accuracy.

2. We identified that one previously cited article (Reference 5) had been retracted. This reference has been removed and replaced with relevant reference that is recent in content.

3. We verified and supplemented DOI information where necessary to ensure that all references are properly documented.

We appreciate the constructive review process and thank you and the reviewers for your guidance. We look forward to your final decision.

Sincerely,

Tong Zhu, Mohd Zaidi Abd Rozan

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

pone.0336416.s004.docx (19KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Baogui Xin

23 Feb 2026

AI Adoption in E-commerce Enterprises: Insights into Current Practices and Future Directions from an Interview Study

PONE-D-25-56804R2

Dear Dr. Zhu,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager®  and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. For questions related to billing, please contact billing support .

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Baogui Xin, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Baogui Xin

PONE-D-25-56804R2

PLOS One

Dear Dr. Zhu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS One. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

You will receive further instructions from the production team, including instructions on how to review your proof when it is ready. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few days to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

You will receive an invoice from PLOS for your publication fee after your manuscript has reached the completed accept phase. If you receive an email requesting payment before acceptance or for any other service, this may be a phishing scheme. Learn how to identify phishing emails and protect your accounts at https://explore.plos.org/phishing.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Baogui Xin

Academic Editor

PLOS One

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Interview questions.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0336416.s001.docx (15.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: renamed_c1794.doc

    pone.0336416.s002.doc (26.5KB, doc)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0336416.s003.docx (26.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers_auresp_2.docx

    pone.0336416.s004.docx (19KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data underlying the findings have been deposited in a stable public repository (Zenodo) and are freely accessible at: (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18298170). The dataset is fully anonymized and does not contain personal identifiers or sensitive information.


    Articles from PLOS One are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES