Abstract
Background
Both lifestyle factors and genetic predisposition contribute to development of diverticulitis.
Objective
To examine whether lifestyle modification can reduce the genetic risk of diverticulitis.
Design
We derived an overall healthy lifestyle score for diverticulitis based on smoking, body mass index [BMI], physical activity, fiber, and red meat among 179,564 participants in three prospective cohorts-the Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), NHSII, and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study (HPFS). The association between the healthy lifestyle score and incident diverticulitis was confirmed among 30,750 participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS). We assessed genetic risk using a polygenic risk score (PRS) among 36,077 individuals with genotype data available. We further validated our findings in the Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB).
Results
A healthy lifestyle score was associated with a decreased risk of diverticulitis. Compared to a score of 0, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for a score of 5 was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.44-0.57; P-trend <.0001). This association was consistent across the SCCS in both non-Hispanic Black and White populations. Each unit increase in the healthy lifestyle score was associated with a reduced diverticulitis risk similarly across genetic risk categories, with HRs of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95) for low, 0.86 (0.81-0.92) for mid, and 0.87 (0.83-0.91) for high genetic risk. In the MGBB cohort, a higher BMI was associated with an increased diverticulitis risk across genetic risk categories.
Conclusion
Maintaining a healthy lifestyle was associated with a reduced risk of developing diverticulitis, regardless of population differences and genetic susceptibilities.
INTRODUCTION
Diverticulitis, inflammation of diverticula that are small sacs forming through weak areas of the colon wall, is the sixth most common gastrointestinal indication for hospitalization1 and is a major reason for emergent colectomy. Patients with diverticulitis suffer from acute symptoms of pain and fever, and some may develop other complications, including peritonitis, obstruction, fistula, or abscess, chronic gastrointestinal complaints, and recurrent episodes2 3.
Both genetic and lifestyle factors have been identified as critical drivers for diverticulitis and more broadly, diverticular disease. Earlier twin studies estimated that 40-53% of the heritability of diverticular disease can be attributed to genetic factors4 5. The candidate gene approach identified the TNFSF15 gene encoding a cytokine of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family associated with diverticulitis6. Multiple genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted and associated 150 genetic variants with diverticular disease, pointing to a role for altered structure of the colon, gut motility, gastrointestinal mucus, and ionic homeostasis that may all contribute to the development of this condition7-11. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) combining the influences of specific risk alleles have demonstrated predictive ability for diverticulitis overall and its severity and recurrences11-13.
Accumulating evidence has also linked lifestyle factors to the development of diverticulitis, including smoking, obesity, lack of physical activity, and a Western dietary pattern of high intake of red and processed meat and low dietary fiber14 15. Adherence to a healthy lifestyle incorporating the individual components could potentially reduce the incidence of diverticulitis by up to 50%16.
However, with the need for datasets containing both genetic inflammation and comprehensive lifestyle data, it remains largely unknown the extent to which genetic risk of diverticulitis can be mitigated by lifestyle changes, or any potential interplay between genetic predisposition and lifestyle in influencing diverticulitis risk. In the current study, we analyzed genetic and detailed lifestyle data from participants in three prospective cohorts, Nurses’ Health Study (NHS), NHSII, and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS). We separately validated the healthy lifestyle score in the Southern Community Cohort Study (SCCS), a cohort with two-thirds non-Hispanic Black individuals. Gene-lifestyle associations were further validated in Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB).
METHODS
Study population
A schema of study population is shown in Supplemental Figure 1. The NHS, NHSII, and HPFS are three ongoing prospective cohort studies of US health professionals. The NHS recruited 121,700 female registered nurses aged 30 to 55 in 1976, while the NHSII recruited 116,429 younger female nurses between 25 and 42 years old in 198917. The HPFS enrolled 51,520 male health professionals aged 40 to 75 in 198618. The participants were followed up every two years by questionnaires querying about health status, medication use, and lifestyle behaviors. Detailed dietary information was obtained through validated food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) every four years19 20. A subset of NHS, NHSII, and HPFS participants of European ancestry had genomic data available from previous GWAS21-23.
The SCCS is a prospective cohort study recruiting 84,507 men and women aged 40 to 79 across 12 US southeastern states between March 2002 and September 200924. Two-thirds of the SCCS cohort were self-reported non-Hispanic Black participants; over half had annual household income <$15,000. Baseline interviews were conducted to collect information on sociodemographics, lifestyle, and medical history. Habitual dietary intake was assessed using a validated FFQ25.
The Mass General Brigham Biobank (MGBB) is a comprehensive repository that houses stored biospecimens linked to clinical information from electronic health records (EHRs) and lifestyle surveys for more than 150,000 consented patients within the MGB healthcare network in Boston, MA. Genomic data is available for over 65,000 participants26.
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Mass General Brigham and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (2014P000837; 2023P001404).
Genotyping and polygenic risk score
The GWAS samples of NHS, NHSII, and HPFS were genotyped in SNP arrays including Illumina HumanHap, Affymetrix, OmniExpress, OncoArray, HumanCoreExome2, and Global Screening Array (GSA). The MGBB samples were genotyped on three arrays offered by Illumina, including the Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array (MEGA), Multi-Ethnic Global (MEG) BeadChip, and the GSA. For both datasets, we used data imputed using the TopMed imputation server based on the GRCh38 human reference genome.
A polygenic risk score (PRS) for diverticulitis was calculated using The Polygenic Score Catalog Calculator (pgsc_calc) with weights derived based on meta-analyzed summary statistics of GWAS for diverticular disease in UK Biobank and Million Veteran Program27. This included all SNPs, not just the significant ones. In brief, a genome-wide association meta-analysis was performed using METAL and was comprised of two independent GWASs for diverticular disease (phecode 562), one in the Million Veteran Program cohort28 and the other performed by the PanUKBB initiative (https://pan.ukbb.broadinstitute.org/phenotypes). The Department of Veteran Affairs Million Veteran Program is a longitudinal cohort of over 1 million veterans and collects precision and genomic information, as previously described in detail elsewhere29. The PanUKBB initiative undertook pan-ancestry genetic analysis of the UK biobank, a publicly available database that recruited approximately 500,000 volunteers and has been described elsewhere30. Polygenic risk weights were calculated using PRS-CSx based on the combined European and African population summary statistics from the GWAS meta-analysis. PRS-CSx is a Bayesian polygenic modeling framework31 and in this study produced a weight file with > 1.2 million SNPs.
Lifestyle factors and healthy lifestyle score
We derived the healthy lifestyle score by considering five major lifestyle factors that have been associated with diverticulitis15, including smoking, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, dietary fiber intake, and total red meat intake (red and processed meat). A summary of the current evidence on the five lifestyle risk factors for diverticulitis is shown in Supplemental Table 1. Participants received a score of 1 for each component if they met the low-risk lifestyle criteria and a score of 0 otherwise. Specifically, those who have never smoked were considered low-risk, as both past and current smoking have been linked to an increased risk of diverticulitis32 33. Individuals with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2 were classified as low-risk since being overweight or obese was associated with a greater risk34. The thresholds for low-risk levels of physical activity (top 40%), fiber intake (top 40%), and total red meat intake (lowest 40%) were determined based on cohort- and questionnaire cycle-specific distributions, consistent with lifestyle score definitions for major chronic diseases and guideline-recommended levels16 35. The overall healthy lifestyle score was calculated by summing up the scores for each individual component (ranging from 0 to 5).
Ascertainment of diverticulitis
Participants of NHS and NHSII were asked if they had diverticulitis requiring antibiotic therapy or hospitalization on biennial questionnaires (2008, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2020 for NHS; 2015, 2017, and 2019 for NHSII). Those who reported having diverticulitis were subsequently asked the year of the episode, dating back to 1990 for NHS and 2003 for NHSII. For HPFS, participants were asked biennially, starting in 1990 until 2020, if they were newly diagnosed with diverticulitis. If they reported diverticulitis, supplementary questionnaires were sent for the date of diagnosis, presenting symptoms, methods of diagnosis, and relevant treatments. Participants were defined as having diverticulitis if they had abdominal pain related to diverticular disease along with one of the following: 1) treated with antibiotic; surgery, or hospitalization; 2) complications such as perforation, abscess, fistula, or obstruction; 3) presentation with fever, requiring medical therapy, or evaluated with computed tomography. The accuracy of ascertaining diverticulitis within the cohorts has been validated33 34 36, with 84%-92% of self-reported cases being confirmed through medical records review.
In the SCCS cohort, diagnosis of diverticulitis was identified through linkage to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and defined as any inpatient, emergency room or outpatient encounter with a colonic diverticulitis diagnosis based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes (ICD9: 562.11, 562.13; ICD10: K57.2, K57.32, K57.33, K57.4, K57.52, K57.53, K57.8 (K57.80, K57.81), K57.92, K57.93) listed as the primary diagnosis.
In the MGBB dataset, we used the same ICD codes (ICD9: 562.11, 562.13; ICD10: K57.2, K57.32, K57.33, K57.4, K57.52, K57.53, K57.8 (K57.80, K57.81), K57.92, K57.93) to identify diverticulitis cases among participants with genomic data and matched each case with five controls according to age, sex, and the last encounter year. We assessed the validity of the identification of patients with diverticulitis using ICD codes by reviewing the medical records of a randomly selected sample of 106 patients, with 91.5% of diverticulitis cases being confirmed.
Statistical analysis
We evaluated the associations of lifestyle factors and the overall healthy lifestyle score with incident diverticulitis in a combined cohort of NHS, NHSII, and HPFS participants. We excluded participants with a history of diverticulitis, cancer, or inflammatory bowel disease, as well as those with missing lifestyle information at baseline. Person-time was calculated from baseline until the date of diagnosis of diverticulitis, death, last follow-up questionnaire, or the end of the study period (1990-2020 for NHS, 2003-2019 for NHSII, and 1986-2020 for HPFS), whichever came first. We used time-varying Cox proportional hazards regression models stratified by age, questionnaire cycle, and cohort and adjusted for other demographical and covariates, including alcohol intake, total calorie intake, regular medication use (aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or acetaminophen), physical examination in the past two years, and menopausal hormone therapy (only for women). Lifestyle factors and covariates were updated by using the most recent information prior to the questionnaire cycle of interest to account for changes over time.
Among participants with genomic data, we examined the association of healthy lifestyle score and PRS individually with diverticulitis, as well as the association between healthy lifestyle score and diverticulitis across PRS categories. We assessed multiplicative interaction using the Wald test by including a product term between continuous measures of lifestyle score and PRS. We also estimated additive interaction between continuous measures of PRS and unhealthy lifestyle score (evaluated in reverse from healthy lifestyle score so effect estimate was positive) by calculating the relative excess risk due to interactions (RERIs), with RERI >0 indicating the presence of significant additive interaction between PRS and unhealthy lifestyle37. We also calculated population-attributable risk (PAR) for lifestyle score overall and within each PRS category.
In the SCCS, we excluded any participants with prevalent diverticulitis or missing lifestyle information and restricted the remaining SCCS participants to those individuals aged ≥ 65 years at cohort enrollment, or persons < 65 years at enrollment who: a) reported being covered by Medicaid (provides medical benefits to low-income adults and uninsured persons) or Medicare (the primary health insurance program for persons aged ≥ 65 or those with disability under age 65) on the baseline questionnaire; or b) did not report Medicare or Medicaid on the baseline questionnaire but had a CMS claim within one year of being enrolled in SCCS. A total of 30,750 participants were included in the analysis of lifestyle and incident diverticulitis using Cox proportional hazard models. Participants were censored on the date of death, diagnosis of diverticulitis, loss to follow-up, or the end of claims data linkage in 2021. We similarly examined the association between healthy lifestyle score and incident diverticulitis as well as potential effect modification by race, with significance evaluated using the Wald test of a product term of healthy lifestyle score and race.
We conducted a case-control study within the MGBB dataset, matching each diverticulitis case with five controls according to age, sex, and year of last encounter. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations of PRS and diverticulitis. To examine potential interaction with lifestyle, we examined BMI in relation to PRS since data on other lifestyle factors were not consistently collected in this cohort.
Patient Involvement
No patients were involved in setting the research question or the outcome measures, nor were they involved in the design and implementation of the study. There are no plans to involve patients in dissemination.
RESULTS
In a combined cohort of 179,564 participants from NHS, NHSII, and HPFS, we documented a total of 10,299 incident diverticulitis cases over an average follow-up of 20 years. Individual lifestyle factors were each significantly associated with the incidence of diverticulitis (Table 1). For example, compared to participants with a BMI < 25 kg/m2, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-1.38) for those who were overweight and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.37-1.52) for those who were obese. Both past smokers (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.12-1.22) and current smokers (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23) had an increased risk of diverticulitis when compared to those who never smoked. Higher levels of physical activity were associated with a reduced risk, with an HR of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79-0.90) comparing participants in the highest to the lowest quintile. Finally, a greater intake of fiber was associated with a reduced risk (extreme-quintile HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.92), whereas a greater intake of red meat was associated with an increased risk (extreme-quintile HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17). When all five lifestyle factors were considered together, a higher score indicating a healthier lifestyle was linearly linked to a lower risk of diverticulitis (HR per 1-point increase: 0.88; 95% CI, 0.86-0.89). Participants with a score of 5 had an HR of 0.50 (95% CI, 0.44-0.57) when compared to those with a score of 0.
Table 1.
Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI) of diverticulitis according to lifestyle risk factors in NHS, NHSII, and HPFS
| Pooled | NHS 1990-2020 (n=56,158) |
NHSII 2003-2019 (n=79,055) |
HPFS 1986-2020 (n=44,351) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases/Person-years | 10,309/3,690,578 | 5,832/1,440,078 | 3,316/1,197,075 | 1,151/1,051,628 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| <25 | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] |
| 25.0-29.9 | 1.32 (1.26-1.38) | 1.29 (1.22-1.37) | 1.48 (1.36-1.61) | 1.13 (0.99-1.29) |
| ≥30 | 1.44 (1.37-1.52) | 1.41 (1.31-1.51) | 1.61 (1.46-1.76) | 1.24 (1.03-1.50) |
| Smoking status | ||||
| Never smoker | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] |
| Past smoker | 1.17 (1.12-1.22) | 1.16 (1.10-1.22) | 1.20 (1.12-1.30) | 1.13 (1.00-1.28) |
| Current smoker | 1.13 (1.04-1.23) | 1.09 (0.97-1.21) | 1.18 (1.02-1.36) | 1.31 (1.04-1.67) |
| Physical activity | ||||
| Q1 (lowest) | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] |
| Q2 | 0.96 (0.91-1.02) | 0.96 (0.89-1.04) | 0.95 (0.86-1.05) | 1.01 (0.84-1.20) |
| Q3 | 0.96 (0.90-1.02) | 0.97 (0.90-1.04) | 0.92 (0.83-1.02) | 0.98 (0.82-1.18) |
| Q4 | 0.92 (0.87-0.98) | 0.91 (0.84-0.99) | 0.91 (0.82-1.02) | 0.97 (0.81-1.17) |
| Q5 (highest) | 0.84 (0.79-0.90) | 0.82 (0.75-0.89) | 0.84 (0.74-0.94) | 0.94 (0.78-1.14) |
| Fiber intake | ||||
| Q1 (lowest) | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] |
| Q2 | 0.94 (0.88-1.00) | 0.97 (0.90-1.05) | 0.93 (0.83-1.03) | 0.83 (0.70-0.99) |
| Q3 | 0.95 (0.89-1.01) | 1.00 (0.92-1.08) | 0.92 (0.82-1.02) | 0.85 (0.71-1.01) |
| Q4 | 0.91 (0.95-0.97) | 0.93 (0.86-1.02) | 0.92 (0.92-1.03) | 0.80 (0.66-0.96) |
| Q5 (highest) | 0.86 (0.80-0.92) | 0.93 (0.85-1.01) | 0.84 (0.75-0.95) | 0.64 (0.51-0.79) |
| Total red meat intake (unprocessed and processed) | ||||
| Q1 (lowest) | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] |
| Q2 | 1.09 (1.02-1.17) | 1.07 (0.98-1.16) | 1.08 (0.96-1.21) | 1.28 (1.04-1.57) |
| Q3 | 1.13 (1.06-1.21) | 1.09 (1.00-1.19) | 1.14 (1.01-1.28) | 1.39 (1.13-1.71) |
| Q4 | 1.10 (1.03-1.18) | 1.06 (0.97-1.16) | 1.15 (1.02-1.29) | 1.21 (0.97-1.50) |
| Q5 (highest) | 1.09 (1.01-1.17) | 1.00 (0.91-1.10) | 1.16 (1.02-1.31) | 1.42 (1.13-1.79) |
| Healthy lifestyle score, out of 5 (components: BMI<25 kg/m2, never smoker, PA Q4-5, fiber intake Q4-5, and red meat intake Q1-2) | ||||
| 0 (unhealthy) | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] |
| 1 | 0.86 (0.81-0.92) | 0.85 (0.78-0.93) | 0.86 (0.76-0.98) | 0.76 (0.63-0.91) |
| 2 | 0.79 (0.74-0.84) | 0.78 (0.72-0.85) | 0.76 (0.67-0.86) | 0.69 (0.57-0.83) |
| 3 | 0.70 (0.65-0.75) | 0.73 (0.66-0.80) | 0.60 (0.53-0.69) | 0.58 (0.48-0.71) |
| 4 | 0.56 (0.51-0.61) | 0.57 (0.51-0.64) | 0.49 (0.42-0.60) | 0.46 (0.36-0.60) |
| 5 (healthy) | 0.50 (0.44-0.57) | 0.49 (0.41-0.60) | 0.42 (0.33-0.53) | 0.54 (0.37-0.78) |
| Per 1 increase | 0.88 (0.86-0.89) | 0.89 (0.87-0.90) | 0.84 (0.81-0.86) | 0.86 (0.82-0.90) |
| P for trend | <.0001 | <.0001 | <.0001 | <.0001 |
Models were adjusted for alcohol intake, total calorie intake, regular aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and acetaminophen use, physical examination in the past two years, and menopausal hormone therapy (only for NHS and NHSII), and stratified by age, questionnaire cycle, and cohort (in the pooled analyses).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HPFS, Health Professionals Follow-up Study; HR, hazard ratio; NHS, Nurses’ Health Study.
The association between the healthy lifestyle score and incident diverticulitis was consistently observed across NHS, NHSII, and HPFS (Table 1). In the SCCS cohort, a total of 2,183 incident diverticulitis cases were ascertained during an average follow-up period of 11.9 years. A healthy lifestyle score similarly showed a significant association with diverticulitis (Figure 1). Those with a healthy lifestyle score of 3-5 had a substantially lower risk (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.58-0.83) compared to those with a score of 0. No notable differences were found comparing the White (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82) and Black (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-0.98; P-interaction = 0.33) populations.
Figure 1. Associations between healthy lifestyle score and risk of incident diverticulitis among 30,750 participants in the Southern Community Cohort Study.

Results from Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age at enrollment, sex, race, educational attainment, annual household income, marital status, enrollment source, and alcohol consumption. Missing data was imputed for race, educational attainment, annual household income, marital status, and alcohol consumption using multiple imputation with 5 imputations. Healthy lifestyle score was derived by summing up scores for individual lifestyle factors. Participants got a score of 1 if they meet the low-risk lifestyle criteria (body mass index <25 kg/m2, never smoker, physically active (≥150 minutes of moderate or ≥75 vigorous leisure-time physical activity per week), fiber intake in the highest quintile, red/processed meat intake in the lowest quintile) and 0 otherwise. Scores 3, 4, 5 were combined due to small numbers in each group. No statistically significant interaction was observed between a healthy lifestyle score and race on the risk of diverticulitis, based on the Wald test of a product term of healthy lifestyle score and race (P for interaction = 0.33).
Among the subset of NHS, NHSII, and HPFS population with available genomic data, there were no notable differences in lifestyle factors across PRS categories (Supplemental Table 2). PRS was significantly associated with incident diverticulitis (Table 2). The adjusted HR was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.52-1.65) for each SD increase in PRS. The link between PRS and diverticulitis appeared to be stronger among younger participants. The HR for diverticulitis with each SD increase in PRS was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.67-1.96) for those younger than 60 years, 1.61 (95% CI, 1.50-1.72) for those aged 60-69 years, and 1.42 (95% CI, 1.33-1.52) for those over 70 years (P-interaction < .0001).
Table 2.
Association of PRS with diverticulitis risk and its interaction with age in NHS, NHSII, and HPFS
| All participants | Age subgroups |
P for interaction b |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <60 years | 60-69 years | ≥70 years | |||
| Cases/Person-years | 2357/808408 | 651/291530 | 832/252267 | 874/264611 | - |
| Age-adjusted HR (95% CI) per 1 SD increase | 1.59 (1.54-1.66) | 1.83 (1.69-1.98) | 1.62 (1.51-1.73) | 1.42 (1.33-1.52) | <.0001 |
| Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI) per 1 SD increase a | 1.58 (1.52-1.65) | 1.81 (1.67-1.96) | 1.61 (1.50-1.72) | 1.42 (1.33-1.52) | <.0001 |
Cox proportional hazards regression models were stratified by age, questionnaire cycle, and cohort.
Multivariable-adjusted models were adjusted for body mass index, aspirin use, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, acetaminophen use, physical examination, smoking status, physical activity, menopausal hormone use, fiber, red meat, alcohol consumption, total calorie intake.
P value for interaction was assessed using the Wald test by including a product term between continuous age and continuous PRS.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PRS, polygenic risk score; SD, standard deviation.
The association between the healthy lifestyle score and diverticulitis was similar across categories of PRS (Table 3). For instance, compared to participants with a score of 0, those with a score of 4-5 had an HR (95% CI) of 0.63 (0.42-0.94) for individuals in the lowest tertile of PRS, 0.48 (0.36-0.64) in the middle tertile, and 0.50 (0.39-0.63) in the highest tertile (P for multiplicative interaction = 0.67). Population-attributable risk analysis showed that adopting a healthy lifestyle could prevent 23% to 42% of diverticulitis cases across PRS categories.
Table 3.
Association of healthy lifestyle score with incident diverticulitis according to PRS tertile in NHS, NHSII, and HPFS
| All participants |
Low PRS | Middle PRS | High PRS |
P for multiplicative interaction b |
P for additive interaction c |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cases/Person-years | 2357/808408 | 470/276342 | 726/272013 | 1161/26005 | - | |
| Healthy lifestyle score, multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI) a | ||||||
| 0 (unhealthy) | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | 1 [ref] | .67 | <.0001 |
| 1 | 0.81 (0.71-0.93) | 1.24 (0.88-1.74) | 0.74 (0.58-0.94) | 0.71 (0.59-0.86) | ||
| 2 | 0.68 (0.59-0.78) | 0.88 (0.62-1.25) | 0.67 (0.52-0.85) | 0.62 (0.51-0.75) | ||
| 3 | 0.66 (0.57-0.76) | 0.99 (0.70-1.41) | 0.58 (0.45-0.75) | 0.60 (0.49-0.74) | ||
| 4,5 (healthy) | 0.50 (0.43-0.59) | 0.63 (0.42-0.94) | 0.48 (0.36-0.64) | 0.50 (0.39-0.63) | ||
| Per 1 increase | 0.87 (0.84-0.90) | 0.89 (0.83-0.95) | 0.86 (0.81-0.92) | 0.87 (0.83-0.91) | ||
| P for trend | <.0001 | .001 | <.0001 | <.0001 | ||
| PAR of healthy lifestyle score d | 26% (18%-34%) | 42% (37%-46%) | 31% (13%-47%) | 23% (11%-35%) | ||
Models were adjusted for alcohol intake, total calorie intake, regular aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and acetaminophen use, physical examination in the past two years, and menopausal hormone therapy, and were stratified by age, questionnaire cycle, and cohort.
P value for multiplicative interaction was assessed using the Wald test by including a product term between continuous healthy lifestyle score and continuous PRS.
P value for additive interaction was assessed between continuous unhealthy lifestyle score (evaluated in reverse from healthy lifestyle score so effect estimate was positive) and continuous PRS. Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) was 0.09 (95% CI, 0.06-0.13).
PAR was calculated with healthy lifestyle score of 4 or 5 as reference, indicating the percentage of diverticulitis that can be prevented if all individuals were in this group.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; PAR, population attributable risk; PRS, polygenic risk score.
We also examined the combined impact of PRS and lifestyle on the risk of diverticulitis. Individuals in the highest PRS group with a healthy lifestyle score of 0 or 1 were 4.8-fold more likely to develop diverticulitis compared to those in the lowest PRS group with a score of 4 or 5 (Supplemental Figure 2). There was a statistically significant additive interaction between lifestyle score and PRS when both were evaluated as continuous variables (RERI: 0.09; 95% CI, 0.06-0.13; P for additive interaction < .0001), indicating that with each 1-point decrease in healthy lifestyle score and each SD increase in PRS, the hazard ratio of developing diverticulitis was 0.09 higher than it would be without the interaction.
In our validation MGBB cohort, an association between PRS and diverticulitis risk was confirmed. We found that for each SD increase in PRS, the odds of developing diverticulitis increased by 1.67 times (95% CI, 1.60-1.75). A higher BMI was associated with an increased risk of diverticulitis regardless of the genetic risk level (Table 4). Individuals in the highest PRS tertile with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 were 5.55 times (95% CI, 4.51-6.82) more likely to develop diverticulitis compared to those in the lowest PRS tertile with a BMI < 25 kg/m2. Furthermore, a similar additive interaction between BMI and PRS on diverticulitis risk was also observed (RERI, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.09-0.17; P for additive interaction < .0001).
Table 4.
Risk of diverticulitis according to joint categories of BMI and PRS in MGBB
| BMI | P for additive interactiona | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRS | <25 kg/m2 | 25-29.9 kg/m2 | ≥30 kg/m2 | |
| Low | 1 [ref] | 1.27 (1.00-1.61) | 1.73 (1.37-2.18) | <.0001 |
| Middle | 1.46 (1.14-1.87) | 2.38 (1.92-2.96) | 2.96 (2.38-3.68) | |
| High | 3.12 (2.50-3.89) | 4.36 (3.53-5.36) | 5.55 (4.51-6.82) | |
P value for additive interaction was assessed between continuous BMI and continuous PRS. Relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) was 0.13 (95% CI, 0.09-0.17).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; MGBB, Mass General Brigham Biobank; PRS, polygenic risk score; RERI, relative excess risk due to interaction
DISCUSSION
In the current study, we showed that a healthy lifestyle score, comprising five components, including no smoking, normal BMI, adequate physical activity, high fiber intake, and low red meat intake, was associated with a lower risk of diverticulitis across multiple cohorts, including a cohort comprised of predominantly non-Hispanic Black participants. Conversely, individuals with a higher PRS were shown to be at increased risk of developing diverticulitis. However, regardless of the genetic risk, adherence to a healthy lifestyle was associated with a significantly decreased risk of the disease in both prospective cohort studies and an EHR-linked biobank study.
Our results support the benefits of adherence to a healthy lifestyle in reducing the risk of developing diverticulitis among various racial groups. Existing evidence on the associations of lifestyle, including obesity36 38, physical activity38 39, smoking32 33, and diet40 41, with the risk of incident diverticulitis was largely from prospective cohorts of predominantly non-Hispanic White populations, whereas the role lifestyle plays in diverticulitis risk among other minority groups remains poorly understood42. The risk of diverticulitis or other diverticular disease may vary by race or ethnicity. For example, non-Hispanic Black individuals were reported to have the highest prevalence of proximal diverticulosis among those who underwent colonoscopies43, while analyses using National Inpatient or Emergency Department Visits data have found that the prevalence of diverticular bleeding was highest in Blacks whereas that of diverticulitis was highest in Whites44 45. By leveraging data from the SCCS cohort including 65% non-Hispanic Black individuals, we were able to enhance the generalizability of our findings and offer insight into the impact of lifestyle on diverticulitis risk in diverse populations.
While the association between overall lifestyle score and diverticulitis was similar across cohorts, we observed differences for individual lifestyle factors. For example, the inverse association of physical activity with diverticulitis in women (NHS/NHSII) was linear. In men (HPFS), however, only vigorous physical activity showed a significant association39. Overweight and obesity appeared to be a more important risk factor in women, whereas diet showed a stronger association with diverticulitis in men. These differences may reflect variation in the relative contribution of potential mechanisms, such as metabolic dysfunction or inflammation, in the development of diverticulitis across populations.
It should be noted that existing GWASs have focused on diverticular disease as the primary outcome due to limitations in the diagnostic coding within biobank studies, making it challenging to distinguish diverticulitis from diverticulosis. Despite this, recent studies have demonstrated that utilizing a PRS combining the subtle effects of individual genetic variants associated with diverticular disease can successfully predict the risk of diverticulitis11-13. A higher PRS was associated with a greater risk of diverticulitis as well as severe diverticulitis and recurrent diverticulitis12 13. We herein validated the association between PRS and incident diverticulitis in both population-based cohort and electronic health record-linked biobank. Additionally, the association on the relative scale appeared to be more pronounced in individuals under the age of 60, indicating that PRS might be more predictive for diverticulitis in younger populations.
There was no statistically significant multiplicative interaction between the healthy lifestyle score and PRS in relation to diverticulitis, suggesting that the impact of genetic or lifestyle factors on diverticulitis does not depend on each other. These results suggest that most individuals, regardless of genetic risk, could achieve similar relative benefits in reducing the risk of diverticulitis by adopting a healthy lifestyle. However, we observed a modest yet significant interaction on the additive scale, indicating the combined impact of genetic susceptibility and lifestyle resulted in a slightly greater risk than the sum of the individual effects when considered independently. This may suggest that the absolute risk of diverticulitis associated with a poor lifestyle varies according to genetic risk, possibly depending on the baseline risk at the population level. These findings have direct implications for both clinical practice and public health.
The notable strengths of this study include the incorporation of well-established prospective cohort studies including diverse racial and ethnic populations leading to greater generalizability, detailed and repeated collection of lifestyle factors to minimize the potential for measurement error, the utilization of PRS based on results from the latest and largest GWAS, as well as the validation of genetic-lifestyle associations with diverticulitis in an external biobank study. Nevertheless, it should be acknowledged that we were unable to examine the interaction between PRS-lifestyle derived from the NHS, NHSII and HPFS cohorts with the full healthy lifestyle score in the MGB Biobank given the available data on lifestyle. Further, the ascertainment of diverticulitis was based on different approaches (i.e., self-reports, ICD codes) in different cohorts. However, the comparative validity of these methods has been demonstrated to be high. Moreover, variation in the ascertainment of diverticulitis within each individual cohort would be expected to underestimate the consistency of the associations that we observed between PRS, lifestyle score, and diverticulitis across the cohorts.
In conclusion, our data provide consistent evidence from multiple datasets indicating that adherence to a healthy lifestyle is linked to a reduced risk of developing diverticulitis, irrespective of one’s genetic predisposition.
Supplementary Material
What is already known on this topic
Prospective cohort studies have linked lifestyle factors to risk of diverticulitis and diverticular disease. Genome-wide association studies have identified up to 150 genetic variants associated with diverticular disease. However, no study has examined whether lifestyle changes can mitigate the genetic risk of diverticulitis or how genetic predisposition and lifestyle factors interact to influence disease risk.
What this study adds
We provide consistent evidence from four prospective cohort studies that a healthy lifestyle score incorporating obesity, physical activity, smoking, dietary fiber, and red meat consumption was associated with a lower risk of diverticulitis across diverse populations. Moreover, regardless of genetic risk, adherence to a healthy lifestyle was associated with a reduced risk of diverticulitis in both prospective cohort studies and an electronic health records-linked biobank study.
How this study might affect research, practice or policy
Maintaining a healthy lifestyle was associated with a reduced risk of developing diverticulitis, regardless of population differences and genetic susceptibilities.
Acknowledgments:
We thank the participants and staff of Nurses’ Health Studies, Health Professionals Follow-Up Study, the Southern Community Cohort Study, and the Mass General Brigham Biobank.
Funding
This work is supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants UM1 CA186107, R01 CA49449, U01 CA176726, R01 CA67262, U01 CA167552, U01 CA202979, R01 DK101495 (ELG, LLS, ATC), R01 DK131694 (LLS), the American Gastroenterological Association Research Foundation’s Research Scholar Awards AGA2021-13-01 (WM), NIH 1K01DK135854-01A1 (WM), and Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Claflin Distinguished Scholar Award (WM). ATC is an American Cancer Society Clinical Research Professor. MSG is supported by the American Diabetes Association grant 9-22-PDFPM-04 and by the NIH grant 5U24DK132733-02. JMD is supported by the MGH Research Training in Digestive Diseases training grant (NIH grant T32 DK007191) and the NIH Loan Repayment Program (L30DK137289). LHM is supported by NIH grant 1K08DK124687. CJN is supported by American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Surgery Resident Research Initiation Grant. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.
Footnotes
Declaration of interests: ATC served as a consultant for Pfizer Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Boehringer Ingelheim and received grants from Pfizer Inc., Zoe Ltd, and Freenome for work unrelated to the topic. LLS is on Data Monitoring Committee for Medtronic for work unrelated to the topic. Other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
REFERENCES
- 1.Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2021. Gastroenterology 2022;162(2):621–44. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.017 [published Online First: 2021/October/23] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Andeweg CS, Berg R, Staal JB, et al. Patient-reported Outcomes After Conservative or Surgical Management of Recurrent and Chronic Complaints of Diverticulitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14(2):183–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.020 [published Online First: 2015/August/26] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bharucha AE, Parthasarathy G, Ditah I, et al. Temporal Trends in the Incidence and Natural History of Diverticulitis: A Population-Based Study. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110(11):1589–96. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Granlund J, Svensson T, Olen O, et al. The genetic influence on diverticular disease--a twin study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;35(9):1103–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05069.x [published Online First: 2012/March/22] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Strate LL, Erichsen R, Baron JA, et al. Heritability and familial aggregation of diverticular disease: a population-based study of twins and siblings. Gastroenterology 2013;144(4):736–42 e1; quiz e14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.030 [published Online First: 2013/January/15] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Connelly TM, Berg AS, Hegarty JP, et al. The TNFSF15 gene single nucleotide polymorphism rs7848647 is associated with surgical diverticulitis. Ann Surg 2014;259(6):1132–7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000232 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sigurdsson S, Alexandersson KF, Sulem P, et al. Sequence variants in ARHGAP15, COLQ and FAM155A associate with diverticular disease and diverticulitis. Nat Commun 2017;8:15789. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15789 [published Online First: 2017/June/07] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maguire LH, Handelman SK, Du X, et al. Genome-wide association analyses identify 39 new susceptibility loci for diverticular disease. Nat Genet 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0203-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schafmayer C, Harrison JW, Buch S, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of diverticular disease points towards neuromuscular, connective tissue and epithelial pathomechanisms. Gut 2019. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Joo YY, Pacheco JA, Thompson WK, et al. Multi-ancestry genome- and phenome-wide association studies of diverticular disease in electronic health records with natural language processing enriched phenotyping algorithm. PLoS One 2023;18(5):e0283553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283553 [published Online First: 2023/May/17] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wu Y, Goleva SB, Breidenbach LB, et al. 150 risk variants for diverticular disease of intestine prioritize cell types and enable polygenic prediction of disease susceptibility. Cell Genom 2023;3(7):100326. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100326 [published Online First: 2023 June 05] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.De Roo AC, Chen Y, Du X, et al. Polygenic Risk Prediction in Diverticulitis. Ann Surg 2022. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005623 [published Online First: 2022/July/26] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schaeffer HD, Smelser DT, Rao HS, et al. Development of a Polygenic Risk Score to Predict Diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2023. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002943 [published Online First: 2023/October/16] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Strate LL. Lifestyle factors and the course of diverticular disease. Dig Dis 2012;30(1):35–45. doi: 10.1159/000335707 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Strate LL, Morris AM. Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatment of Diverticulitis. Gastroenterology 2019. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Liu PH, Cao Y, Keeley BR, et al. Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle is Associated With a Lower Risk of Diverticulitis among Men. Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112(12):1868–76. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bao Y, Bertoia ML, Lenart EB, et al. Origin, Methods, and Evolution of the Three Nurses' Health Studies. Am J Public Health 2016;106(9):1573–81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rimm EB, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of an expanded self-administered semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire among male health professionals. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135(10):1114–26; discussion 27-36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuan C, Spiegelman D, Rimm EB, et al. Validity of a Dietary Questionnaire Assessed by Comparison With Multiple Weighed Dietary Records or 24-Hour Recalls. Am J Epidemiol 2017;185(7):570–84. doi: 10.1093/aje/kww104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Al-Shaar L, Yuan C, Rosner B, et al. Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire in Men Assessed by Multiple Methods. Am J Epidemiol 2021;190(6):1122–32. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa280 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Qi Q, Chu AY, Kang JH, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages and genetic risk of obesity. N Engl J Med 2012;367(15):1387–96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203039 [published Online First: 2012 September 21] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ding M, Ahmad S, Qi L, et al. Additive and Multiplicative Interactions Between Genetic Risk Score and Family History and Lifestyle in Relation to Risk of Type 2 Diabetes. Am J Epidemiol 2020;189(5):445–60. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Thomas G, Jacobs KB, Kraft P, et al. A multistage genome-wide association study in breast cancer identifies two new risk alleles at 1p11.2 and 14q24.1 (RAD51L1). Nat Genet 2009;41(5):579–84. doi: 10.1038/ng.353 [published Online First: 2009 March 29] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Signorello LB, Hargreaves MK, Steinwandel MD, et al. Southern community cohort study: establishing a cohort to investigate health disparities. J Natl Med Assoc 2005;97(7):972–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Signorello LB, Munro HM, Buchowski MS, et al. Estimating nutrient intake from a food frequency questionnaire: incorporating the elements of race and geographic region. Am J Epidemiol 2009;170(1):104–11. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Boutin NT, Schecter SB, Perez EF, et al. The Evolution of a Large Biobank at Mass General Brigham. J Pers Med 2022;12(8) doi: 10.3390/jpm12081323 [published Online First: 2022 August 17] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Neylan CJ, Levin MG, Hartmann K, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analysis identifies 126 novel loci for diverticular disease and implicates connective tissue and colonic motility. medRxiv 2025. doi: 10.1101/2025.03.27.25324777 [published Online First: 2025 March 28] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Verma A, Huffman JE, Rodriguez A, et al. Diversity and scale: Genetic architecture of 2068 traits in the VA Million Veteran Program. Science 2024;385(6706):eadj1182. doi: 10.1126/science.adj1182 [published Online First: 2024 July 19] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gaziano JM, Concato J, Brophy M, et al. Million Veteran Program: A mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;70:214–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.016 [published Online First: 2015 October 09] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med 2015;12(3):e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779 [published Online First: 2015 March 31] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ruan Y, Lin YF, Feng YA, et al. Improving polygenic prediction in ancestrally diverse populations. Nat Genet 2022;54(5):573–80. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01054-7 [published Online First: 2022 May 05] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hjern F, Wolk A, Hakansson N. Smoking and the risk of diverticular disease in women. Br J Surg 2011;98(7):997–1002. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7477 [published Online First: 2011/April/05] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gunby SA, Ma W, Levy MJ, et al. Smoking and Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Incident Diverticulitis in Women. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.11.036 [published Online First: 2023/December/21] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ma W, Jovani M, Liu PH, et al. Association Between Obesity and Weight Change and Risk of Diverticulitis in Women. Gastroenterology 2018;155(1):58–66 e4. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.03.057 [published Online First: 2018/April/04] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chomistek AK, Chiuve SE, Eliassen AH, et al. Healthy lifestyle in the primordial prevention of cardiovascular disease among young women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65(1):43–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.10.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Strate LL, Liu YL, Aldoori WH, et al. Obesity increases the risks of diverticulitis and diverticular bleeding. Gastroenterology 2009;136(1):115–22 e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.09.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Knol MJ, van der Tweel I, Grobbee DE, et al. Estimating interaction on an additive scale between continuous determinants in a logistic regression model. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36(5):1111–8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dym157 [published Online First: 2007 August 27] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hjern F, Wolk A, Hakansson N. Obesity, physical inactivity, and colonic diverticular disease requiring hospitalization in women: a prospective cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107(2):296–302. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.352 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Strate LL, Liu YL, Aldoori WH, et al. Physical activity decreases diverticular complications. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104(5):1221–30. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Crowe FL, Appleby PN, Allen NE, et al. Diet and risk of diverticular disease in Oxford cohort of European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): prospective study of British vegetarians and non-vegetarians. BMJ 2011;343:d4131. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Crowe FL, Balkwill A, Cairns BJ, et al. Source of dietary fibre and diverticular disease incidence: a prospective study of UK women. Gut 2014;63(9):1450–6. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ma W, Hua S, Kaplan RC, et al. Obesity and diverticulitis in U.S. Hispanics/Latinos: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos JAMA Surg 2023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Peery AF, Keku TO, Galanko JA, et al. Sex and Race Disparities in Diverticulosis Prevalence. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18(9):1980–86. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.10.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wheat CL, Strate LL. Trends in Hospitalization for Diverticulitis and Diverticular Bleeding in the United States From 2000 to 2010. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14(1):96–103 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.03.030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zheng NS, Ma W, Shung DL, et al. Sex, Race, and Ethnicity Differences in Patients Presenting With Diverticular Disease at Emergency Departments in the United States: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Gastro Hep Adv 2024;3(2):178–80. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.11.012 [published Online First: 2023 November 27] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
