Table 2.
Probit analysis of nematicidal activity against second-stage juveniles (J2) of Meloidogyne incognita
| Sample | Exposure time (h) | LC50 (µg/mL) | 95% CI (LL–UL) | Probit parameters | Model fit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAO | 24 | (> 1000) | 155.33–9700.25 | β = 1.069, Intercept = − 3.30 | χ2 = 0.83, p = 0.361 |
| 48 | 722.01 | 127.72–4081.44 | β = 1.25, Intercept = − 1.25 | χ2 = 0.38, p = 0.536 | |
| 72 | 498.69 | 98.98–2512.41 | β = 1.33, Intercept = − 3.60 | χ2 = 0.04, p = 0.838 | |
| 96 | 455.84 | 455.84–1504.986 | β = 1.84, Intercept = − 0.489 | χ2 = 0.08, p = 0.769 | |
| CSNP | 24 | 290.64 | 142.49–592.83 | β = 3.68, Intercept = − 9.07 | χ2 = 0.01, p = 0.922 |
| 48 | 239.53 | 108.55–528.54 | β = 1.54, Intercept = − 0.214 | χ2 = 1.54, p = 0.21 | |
| 72 | 133.72 | 40.30–443.711 | β = 2.59, Intercept = − 5.51 | χ2 = 4.26, p = 0.039 | |
| 96 | 12.88 | 0.42–388.98 | β = 1.06, Intercept = − 1.18 | χ2 = 0.93, p = 0.334 | |
| Nimitz | 24 | 259.43 | 85.67–785.65 | β = 2.12, Intercept = − 5.12 | χ2 = 0.00, p = 0.987 |
| 48 | 112.54 | 25.78–491.167 | β = 1.91, Intercept = − 3.93 | χ2 = 0.64, p = 0.421 | |
| 72 | 33.23 | 2.67–412.28 | β = 1.29, Intercept = − 1.97 | χ2 = 0.02, p = 0.872 | |
| 96 | 0.046 | 0.00–337.23 | β = 0.44, Intercept = 0.59 | χ2 = 0.17, p = 0.675 |