Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 21;20(2):275–282. doi: 10.5009/gnl250285

Table 2.

Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Recurrence

Patient Sex Age at
diagnosis, yr
EUS ESD/
EMR
Endoscopic size, mm Pathologic size, mm Grade (pathology) Mitosis (/10HPF) DOTA PET Rectal MRI Lesion of metastasis Days of recurrence
1 M 54 NA EMR 3 Missing Missing Missing NA NA Metachronous lesion 454
2 M 33 NA ESD 8 8 1 <2 NA NA Metachronous lesion 400
3 F 57 NA EMR 3 4 Missing <2 NA NA Metachronous lesion 1,269
4 M 39 NA EMR 4 3.5 Missing <2 NA NA Metachronous lesion 401
5 M 61 NA ESD 3 4 Missing <2 NA NA Metachronous lesion 2,279
6 F 50 SM ESD 7.7 7 2 2-20 NA NA Lymph node 574
7 M 38 NA EMR 3 6 1 Missing Done Done Metachronous lesion 82
8 M 51 NA EMR 3 2 1 Missing NA NA Metachronous lesion 1,236
9 M 48 NA EMR 3 3 1 <2 NA NA Metachronous lesion 546
10 M 61 SM EMR 6 4 1 Missing NA NA Focal 314
11 M 50 NA EMR 13 12 2 >20 NA NA Lymph node & liver
metastasis
1,656
12 M 67 SM ESD 9 8 2 >20 NA NA Liver metastasis 2,476

EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; HPF, high-power field; DOTA PET, 68Ga-labeled DOTA-peptide positron emission tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NA, not available; SM, submucosa.