Skip to main content
. 2025 Oct 21;20(2):275–282. doi: 10.5009/gnl250285

Table 3.

Risk Factor Associated with Recurrence of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor (ver. Mitosis)

Parameter Comparison Univariable analysis Multivariable analysis
HR (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value
ESD Done vs not done 0.89 (0.27–2.99) 0.85
EMR Done vs not done 1.63 (0.43–6.06) 0.46
Endoscopic size 0.91 (0.72–1.16) 0.47
Pathologic size 1.13 (0.92–1.39) 0.23 1.12 (0.86–1.46) 0.41
Grade 2 vs 1 23.60 (5.32–104.68) <0.001
Mitosis 0.001 0.008
2–20 vs <2 (/HPF) 23.65 (1.86–300.50) 0.01 20.88 (1.61–270.19) 0.02
>20 vs <2 (/HPF) 11.19 (1.58–79.31) 0.01 7.93 (0.90–69.87) 0.07
EUS depth 0.58
SM vs MM 3.85 (0.04–356.15) 1.00
PM vs SM 5.16 (0.03–813.78) 0.93
CCI 0.59
1 vs 0 1.37 (0.25–7.66) 1.00
2 vs 0 1.99 (0.43–9.15) 0.62

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection; EMR, endoscopic mucosal resection; HPF, high-power field; EUS, endoscopic ultrasonography; SM, submucosal; MM, muscularis mucosae; PM, muscularis propria; CCI, Charlson Comorbidity Index.