Table 2.
The 2 × 2 analyses [9] of the data in Table 1
| Test | Comparison | a | b | c | d | Odds ratio | Fisher's P value |
| DQA-RA | 179 | 58 | 146 | 160 | 3.4 | 3E-11 | |
| association | |||||||
| SE association | 172 | 65 | 127 | 179 | 3.7 | 3E-13 | |
| DQA-RA association | |||||||
| in SE-positive | ++ vs -+ | 172 | 0 | 127 | 0 | ND | ND |
| DQA-RA association | |||||||
| in SE-negative | +- vs-- | 7 | 58 | 19 | 160 | 1.1 | NS |
| SE association in | |||||||
| DQ-RA-positive | ++ vs +- | 172 | 7 | 127 | 19 | 3.5 | 0.0024; pc = 0.029 |
| SE association in | |||||||
| DQ-RA-negative | -+ vs-- | 0 | 58 | 0 | 160 | ND | ND |
ND, Not defined; NS, not significant; Pc, corrected P value; a and b, numbers of patients with and without marker in question; c and d, numbers of controls with and without marker in question.