Table 3.

Aggregated responses to quantitative feedback items.

Variable	Wave 1		Wave 2		Community X
	N	Mean (SD) or n (%)	N	Mean (SD) or n (%)	N	Mean (SD) or n (%)
Perceived helpfulness (1 = not at all helpful, 5 = extremely helpful)	78	4.42 (0.61)	40	4.25 (0.77)	15	4.07 (0.68)
Perceived relevance (1 = not at all relevant, 5 = extremely relevant)	78	4.36 (0.82)	40	4.48 (0.74)	15	4.13 (0.96)
Usefulness of didactic (1 = not at all useful, 5 = extremely useful)	75	4.56 (0.57)	40	4.25 (0.70)	28a	3.82 (0.54)
Usefulness of case presentation or discussion (1 = not at all useful, 5 = extremely useful)b	71	4.25 (0.97)	37	4.18 (0.83)	19	4.00 (0.79)
Presentation addressed racial and social equity	78	70 (90%)	40	36 (90%)	NAc	NAc

^aThe Community X LC on Bipolar Disorder included two didactics and participants could rate the usefulness of both, thus leading to the greater sample size for this item.

^bIf a LC included a case presentation, the feedback questionnaire included an item about the usefulness of the case presentation, while the LCs that did not include a case presentation had an item about the usefulness of the discussion. Very few LCs asked about both case presentations and discussions (n = 3) or neither (n = 1).

^cCommunity X attendees were not asked whether the presentation addressed racial and social equity, as that question was added later in the series.