Table 2.
Responses to generative artificial intelligence relationship items among individuals endorsing lifetime generative artificial intelligence use (N=846). Numbers vary by item as a result of missing responses.
| Variables | Low risk (n=605), n (%) | Elevated risk (n=241), n (%) | ORa (95% CI) | Chi-square (df) | P value | |||||||||
| Companion (N=846) | 1.76 (1.30-2.39) | 13.44 (1) | <.001 | |||||||||||
|
|
No (n=531, 62.8%) | 403 (66.6) | 128 (53.1) |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Yes (n=315, 37.2%) | 202 (33.4) | 113 (46.9) |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Therapist (N=846) | 3.08 (2.24-4.24) | 50.24 (1) | <.001 | |||||||||||
|
|
No (n= 601, 71%) | 472 (78.0) | 129 (53.5) |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Yes (n=245, 29%) | 133 (22.0) | 112 (46.5) |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Friend (N=846) | 2.52 (1.85-3.43) | 35.61 (1) | <.001 | |||||||||||
|
|
No (n=549, 64.9%) | 430 (71.1) | 119 (49.4) |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Yes (n=297, 35.1%) | 175 (28.9) | 122 (50.6) |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Romantic partner (N=846) | 2.62 (1.29-5.32) | 7.56 (1) | .006 | |||||||||||
|
|
No (n=814, 96.2%) | 589 (97.4) | 225 (93.4) |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Yes (n=32, 3.8%) | 16 (2.6) | 16 (6.6) |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Sexual partner (N=846) | 0.92 (0.38-2.22) | 0.03 (1) | .86 | |||||||||||
|
|
No (n=820, 96.9%) | 586 (96.9) | 234 (97.1) |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Yes (n=26, 3.1%) | 19 (3.1) | 7 (2.9) |
|
|
|
||||||||
aOR: odds ratio.