Abstract
Background
Advocacy is widely recognized as a catalyst for equity in health, yet its conceptual foundations, operational forms, and evaluative criteria remain fragmented. In health systems, advocacy is expected to amplify marginalized voices, address structural determinants, and promote participatory governance, but there is limited consensus on its definition and implementation. This scoping review systematically maps how advocacy has been conceptualized, practiced, and evaluated across public health and healthcare domains in democratic societies, with particular attention to its role in advancing equity.
Methods
We conducted a scoping review across four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL) including peerreviewed literature from health, legal, political, and social domains. Eligible studies explicitly addressed advocacy in health and care contexts, providing conceptual definitions, theoretical frameworks, or descriptions of practice, education, and evaluation. Thematic synthesis was applied to identify recurrent dimensions, strategies, and values.
Results
A total of 146 documents were included. Advocacy was consistently framed as a deliberate, value-driven practice oriented toward systemic change, social justice, and equity, despite considerable conceptual and operational variability. Applications spanned clinical care, public health promotion, community mobilization, and policy reform. Relational and communicative skills were widely emphasized as enabling factors, but evaluation remained limited: only 6 studies (4%) reported the use of specific measurement instruments, none of which were standardized. From this synthesis, we developed a preliminary blueprint for equity-oriented public health advocacy, structured around six components: normative grounding; multilevel orientation; relational and communicative practices; critical and systemic literacy; reflexive professionalism and civic agency; and evaluation and accountability mechanisms.
Conclusions
Advocacy emerges as both a professional competency and a civic practice essential for equity-driven health systems. This review provides a conceptual foundation and a translational framework to guide integration of advocacy into policy, training, and practice. Sustained collaboration between academia, civil society, and health systems is required to institutionalise advocacy as a driver of just and inclusive health governance.
Registration
Keywords: Public health advocacy, Health equity, Health policy, Evidence-based advocacy, Patient engagement, Patient empowerment, Competency-based education, Systematic review
Introduction
Advocacy has become a central concern in contemporary public health and healthcare systems, where it is increasingly recognized as a critical lever to promote equity, amplify marginalized voices, and drive systemic transformation [1, 2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has explicitly positioned advocacy as a fundamental function of health promotion, particularly in advancing people-centered and equity-driven health systems [3]. Across disciplines, advocacy is invoked both as a professional responsibility and as a civic practice, linking lived experiences to institutional decision-making and policy reform [4, 5]. It is also increasingly framed as an essential competency for health professionals, community leaders, and civil society actors to address structural determinants of health, redistribute resources, and challenge entrenched inequities [6–8]. From shaping legislative agendas to fostering community empowerment—understood as strengthening communities’ capacity to articulate priorities, participate in decision-making, and influence the conditions affecting their health—advocacy serves as a bridge between evidence, ethics, and power in the pursuit of just and inclusive health systems [9–11].
However, advocacy cannot be understood as a singular or static concept: while its core normative commitments may remain stable, both the meanings attributed to advocacy and the strategies through which it is enacted evolve in response to changing configurations of power, knowledge, and governance within health systems [12]. For instance, within global public health, advocacy practices and strategies have evolved in parallel with transformations in aid architectures, the rise of philanthropic actors, and transnational movements for human rights and climate justice [13, 14]. These shifts reflect broader dynamics such as health consumerism, welfare restructuring, the growth of civil society, and global mobilisations around equity and health rights [15]. Advocacy may be undertaken by professionals or patients, through formal organisational strategies or grassroots networks, and may target clinical practices, institutional policies, or public legislation. Its expressions are therefore multidimensional, spanning bedside clinical decision-making, patient representation, public campaigns, curriculum development, and legal initiatives. For instance, studies have examined how advocacy is conceptualised, taught, and operationalised within medical, nursing, and public health education. This body of work highlights a growing emphasis on advocacy-related knowledge, skills, and experiential learning within health professional training, particularly in relation to policy engagement, community action, and equity-oriented practice [16–18]; grassroots advocacy has been implemented via community health worker programs aimed at equity in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) [19]; and legal advocacy through medical–legal partnerships demonstrates that addressing health-harming legal needs can contribute to health justice [20]. Throughout this review, the term advocacy is used as an overarching concept to capture a family of practices operating across public health and healthcare contexts. While the analysis is grounded in public health systems and equity-oriented goals, it encompasses diverse forms of advocacy—including public health advocacy, patient advocacy, and community-based advocacy—which differ in actors, targets, and levels of action, but share common normative commitments and mechanisms relevant to equity.
Yet, despite this diversity, advocacy remains under-theorized and inconsistently operationalised across contexts, often described more in normative terms than as an object of systematic study [5, 21]. Despite its strategic relevance, advocacy frequently lacks theoretical clarity and operational consistency. While endorsed in institutional discourse, curricula, and policy guidelines, its ethical assumptions, mechanisms of action, and scope are often implicit or contested [21, 22]. In healthcare settings, advocacy is sometimes reduced to individual acts of speaking up; in public health, it may be framed as either structural reform or a tool for democratic engagement [16, 23]. This conceptual ambiguity mirrors broader debates in political science and social movements research, where advocacy is variably understood as lobbying, activism, representation, or empowerment [22]. Such conceptual fluidity creates challenges for empirical study, curriculum design, policy evaluation, and the professionalization of advocacy roles, thereby hindering its systematic integration into health systems.
Notably, frameworks such as Carlisle’s dual model of representational and facilitative advocacy highlight the dual goals of protecting vulnerable individuals and empowering them to achieve autonomy [24]. Similarly, Christoffel’s process and product model emphasises structured stages and outcomes of public health advocacy [25]. More recent analyses adopt evolutionary and systemic perspectives: Farias et al. [26] conceptualized advocacy as an intentional action spanning micro- to macro-levels, jointly implemented with and for communities, particularly those facing health inequities, with the aim of preserving or improving health, well-being, and empowerment for health promotion. Other scholars highlight advocacy as a practice of ‘boundary spanning’ across clinical, community, and policy domains, requiring relational skills, political literacy, and the ability to mobilize both formal evidence and lived experience [4, 23]. These approaches highlight advocacy’s adaptive and multi-level nature, but also underline the absence of consensus regarding core values, competencies, and evaluation standards.
In health and care contexts—where advocacy directly affects health outcomes, priorities, and resource allocation—there is a vital need to promote evidence-informed advocacy. This concept integrates research evidence with contextual knowledge and stakeholder perspectives, ensuring that advocacy strategies are ethically grounded and demonstrably effective [6, 27, 28]. Farrer et al. [1] define it as a deliberate effort to influence decision-makers using research-based evidence to improve health equity. Nurses’ policy advocacy, for example, has been framed as effective only when grounded in evidence and focused on social determinants of health [29]. Yet, systematic evaluations of advocacy remain scarce, and existing assessment tools are often context-specific and lack validation [30, 31].
This review addresses these gaps by offering a systematic, interdisciplinary analysis of how advocacy is conceptualised, theorised, and operationalised across public health, clinical practice, education, and social science domains in democratic contexts. The objectives are to: (1) clarify the conceptual landscape of advocacy; (2) delineate its core values, strategies, and competencies; (3) examine how advocacy has been integrated into education and training; and (4) assess available approaches to its measurement and evaluation. In doing so, the review lays the groundwork for more coherent, equity-oriented and evidence-informed advocacy scholarship and practice, while also identifying gaps that require further empirical investigation.
Methods
Study design
This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews [32, 33] and is reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) reporting guideline and checklist [34]. The study protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MEJHX) to ensure transparency and methodological rigor.
The objective of the review was to examine how advocacy is defined, conceptualised, and operationalised across public health, clinical practice, education, and social science domains in democratic contexts. The synthesis aimed to identify theoretical models, operational components, values, and educational implications, with particular attention to interdisciplinary perspectives that bridge health, legal, social, and policy domains.
Eligibility criteria
Studies were eligible for inclusion if they:
(a) provided an explicit definition or conceptualization of advocacy in public health and/or (b) presented theoretical models, frameworks, strategies, tools, or core components (e.g., competencies) related to advocacy and (c) were situated in any context where advocacy impacts public health, including through action on the social determinants of health; and (d) were published in English, including both peer-reviewed and grey literature (e.g., empirical studies, policy papers, institutional documents, or editorials with analytical content).
Eligible studies included empirical research, educational reports, and theoretical or conceptual papers. Studies were excluded if they did not focus primarily on the conceptualization or definition of advocacy, if advocacy was not thematically central to the work, or if the discussion was not situated within public health, healthcare, or health-related policy contexts in democratic societies. Review articles, meta-analyses, concept analyses, and opinion pieces lacking analytical grounding were excluded, as were publications not written in English.
Search strategy and information sources
An interdisciplinary search strategy was developed and refined in consultation with domain experts and an advisory group of health researchers and advocates. Searches were conducted across four electronic databases—PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL—to capture a comprehensive body of literature relevant to the conceptualization of advocacy in public health healthcare, education, and social science domains.
The search strategy combined controlled vocabulary and free-text terms across three domains: (1) types of advocacy (e.g., “policy advocacy,” “patient advocacy,” “community advocacy,” “professional advocacy,” “legal advocacy,” “media advocacy,” “youth advocacy”); (2) conceptual or theoretical framing (e.g., “definition,” “conceptualization,” “framework,” “model,” “principle,” “theory”); and (3) public health contexts (e.g., “public health,” “population health,” “global health,” “health promotion,” “health equity,” “health policy,” “health rights”). All searches were run in March 2025.
Screening and selection process
All records identified through the database searches were imported into Rayyan [35] and screened in two phases. In the first phase, titles and abstracts were independently assessed by two reviewers (M.M.; S.B.) for alignment with the inclusion criteria. In the second phase, the same reviewers (M.M.; S.B.) independently examined the full texts of potentially eligible articles. Any discrepancies at either stage were resolved through discussion and consensus. The review team comprised interdisciplinary scholars with expertise in public health, patient engagement, health communication, and health policy.
Data extraction and analysis
Data extraction was carried out using a structured form developed and piloted by the research team. The extracted variables encompassed publication details (authors, year, country, document type, and focus); conceptualizations of advocacy and its application context; advocacy characteristics, including category, level, and form; as well as advocacy goals and operational components. Methodological study design (e.g., quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods) was not systematically extracted, as the primary aim of the review was to map the conceptual, theoretical, and operational representations of advocacy rather than to synthesise empirical effects or outcomes. Consistent with scoping review methodology, emphasis was placed on conceptual content and normative framing rather than on methodological appraisal. Accordingly, data extraction prioritised definitions, normative assumptions, advocacy goals, levels, forms, and operational components. While many included documents drew on empirical material, methodological design and analytic procedures were not treated as analytically central variables within the scope of this review. In addition, information was collected on normative underpinnings, such as underlying values and the implicit vision of health, on reported or expected outcomes, and on advocacy-specific measurement tools, where these were available.
Data were analyzed through a thematic synthesis approach. This process involved inductive coding of textual segments, identification of recurrent patterns across conceptual and empirical contributions, and cross-mapping of emerging themes with advocacy categories and levels. The synthesis was iterative, with regular team discussions to refine thematic groupings and resolve coding ambiguities.
Advisory engagement and reflexivity
To ensure the review’s relevance and credibility across stakeholder groups, the process was supported by a multidisciplinary advisory board, including public health scholars, patient advocates, clinicians, and policy advisors. The advisory board was involved in refining the research questions, validating the methodological approach, and interpreting the emerging themes in light of practice-based insights. Reflexive attention was paid to the positionality of the authors and the diverse epistemological frameworks shaping the interpretation of advocacy in health.
Results
Search results
The initial search yielded 17,194 records. After removal of 8112 duplicates, 9082 records were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 8736 were excluded as not meeting the eligibility criteria. Among the 346 reports sought for full-text retrieval, 52 could not be retrieved because the full texts were unavailable despite attempts to access them through institutional subscriptions, interlibrary loan services, or direct contact with authors, or because the sources were no longer accessible (e.g., inactive links or discontinued publications). The remaining 294 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility, leading to the exclusion of 200 (studies as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Ultimately, 146 documents were included in the final synthesis. The search results and study inclusion process were documented in detail and presented in Fig. 1, following the PRISMA-ScR extension guidelines [34, 36].
Fig. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram of study selection and inclusion process
Descriptive overview of included studies
The included documents consisted predominantly of peer-reviewed scientific articles (n = 142; 97.3%), complemented by a small number of grey literature sources in the form of reports (n = 4; 2.7%). Collectively, these materials reflect both academic and practice-oriented perspectives on advocacy. Although the majority of included documents were peer-reviewed scientific articles, these encompassed a heterogeneous body of work, including conceptual and theoretical papers as well as empirical contributions, the latter most often relying on qualitative or descriptive approaches rather than formal evaluative designs.
The literature was geographically concentrated in high-income countries, with the United States contributing more than half of all documents (n = 81; 55.5%). Other countries with notable contributions were Canada (n = 7; 4.8%), the United Kingdom (n = 6; 4.1%), Australia (n = 7; 4.8%), and India (n = 4; 2.7%). A limited number of studies originated from Brazil, Chile, China, Ethiopia, Germany, Guatemala, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Tanzania, Macedonia, Netherlands, Nigeria, Philippines, South Africa, Spain, Thailand, and Turkey. In addition, a set of 17 documents (11.6%) adopted a global or multi-country perspective. Across the three decades (1995–2025) covered by the review, an increase in publications was observed from 2010 (n = 122; 83.6%), indicating a growing scholarly and policy interest in advocacy within health-related contexts.
Table 1 summarizes the key characteristics of the included studies, including publication details, advocacy domains, conceptualizations, and reported outcomes.
Table 1.
Characteristics and main findings of included studies
| Authors, year | Country | Document type | Focus | Advocacy application context | Advocacy category | Advocacy level | Form of advocacy | Advocacy conceptualization | Implicit health vision | Underlying values | Advocacy goals | Operational components | Expected/reported outcomes | Measuring instruments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abdikeeva & Covaci, 2017 [37] | Macedonia | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Protection of the right to health for roma communities | Policy, Legal, Health | Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy as a rights-based and legal process involving empowerment, documentation, media engagement, and litigation to improve accountability and access to health for Roma communities. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Human Rights | Access, Accountability, Empowerment, Rights | NGOs, Paralegals, Training, Strategic Litigation, Media Advocacy | Increased Awareness Of Rights, Legal Cases, Administrative Changes | NA |
| Abdikeeva et al., 2013 [38] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Protection of the right to health for roma communities in multiple contexts | Policy, Legal, Health | Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy as civil society’s capacity to use legal frameworks and rights-based tools (empowerment, documentation, media, litigation) to challenge systemic violations in healthcare. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Inclusion, Civil And Human Rights | Human Rights, Access, Accountability, Participation | NGOs, Legal Advocacy, Media, Strategic Litigation, Empowerment | Reduction Of Violations, Greater Accountability, Systemic Impact | NA |
| Aliani et al., 2021 [39] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Medical education | Policy, Health | Micro | Professional | Advocacy as broad social, economic, educational, and political action to reduce suffering and improve health, recognized as a core professional responsibility of physicians. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Social Responsibility | Education, Empowerment | Student Feedback, Thematic Analysis Of Focus Groups | Students Felt Unprepared For Advocacy Role | NA |
| Anselin et al., 2024 [40] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Health system and policy | Policy, Health | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as medical students’ engagement in partnerships with communities to address social determinants of health and advance health equity. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Empowerment, Justice | Equity, Participation, Systemic Reform | Stakeholders, Public Institutions | Policy Alignment, Institutional Engagement | NA |
| Babu et al., 2016 [41] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Maternal and child health policy | Policy, Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as a collective and organized effort to secure political and financial support for evidence-based health interventions (specifically, cardiac rehabilitation). | Bio-psycho-social | Accountability, Efficiency | Policy Influence, System Integration | Coalitions, Stakeholder Engagement, Government Outreach | Increased MCH Program Integration | NA |
| Bachofer, Velarde & Clithero, 2011 [42] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Family medicine training, academic and community context | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy as a professional role of physicians, cultivated through training, that enables them to act on behalf of patients and communities in both health and policy arenas. | Bio-psycho-social, Community-centered | Responsibility, Civic Engagement, Self-Determination | Training for Engagement, Participation, Local Advocacy | Medical Residencies, Legislative Sessions, Community Engagement, Policy Analysis | Awareness Of The Physician’s Role As A Civic Actor, Engagement | NA |
| Banas & Gershon, 2024 [43] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Public health education and training | Health, Policy, | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as the ability of students to influence conditions affecting personal, peer, family, school, and community health through planning, communication, and persuasive action. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Inclusion, Preparedness | Professional Preparedness, Systems Change, Policy Engagement | Interdisciplinary Courses, Skills Development, Practice-Based Learning | Increased Student Engagement, Preparedness For Advocacy, Enhanced Policy Literacy | NA |
| Belkowitz et al., 2014 [44] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Pediatric residency training | Health, | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as a set of skills and knowledge developed through service-learning and community partnerships in medical education. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Responsibility, Compassion | Equity, Systems Improvement, Professional Development | Resident Seminars, Case-Based Learning, Project Work | Improved Awareness And Role Identification | NA |
| Bernard et al., 2019 [45] | Canada | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Medical student engagement | Health, | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy as part of physicians’ professional identity across micro, meso, and macro levels of social accountability. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Responsiveness | Social Accountability, Equity | Advocacy Skill-Building, Community Project Involvement | Enhanced Engagement, Empowerment Of Learners | NA |
| Bhattarai et al., 2020 [46] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Medical education | Health, Policy, | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as the application of Rehabilitation Psychology’s foundational principles to promote equity, requiring a shift from individual-level to systemic and structural action. | Bio-psycho-social | Responsibility, Justice | Social Change, Medical Professionalism | Elective Courses, Reflection Exercises | Greater Awareness, Role Clarity | NA |
| Bhatti et al., 2022 [47] | Australia | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Climate and health policy | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as the active support of a cause through diverse strategies (speaking, writing, mobilization) to improve health policy and equity. | Bio-psycho-social | Climate Justice, Public Health | Climate Resilience, Health System Reform | Coalition Building, Media Outreach, Stakeholder Lobbying | COP Participation, Agenda Visibility | NA |
| Bhojani, Venkataraman & Manganawar, 2013 [48] | India | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Tobacco control, urban health | Policy, Community | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy as collective action using legal, media, and civil society strategies to counter harmful industry–state ties in tobacco control. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Participation, Health Rights | Policy Reform, Awareness Raising | Community Coalition, Policy Engagement, Media Use | Tobacco Vendor Policy Changes, Community Mobilization | NA |
| Blenner, Lang & Prelip, 2017 [49] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Public health training, university-community partnerships | Public Health, Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional, Community, Systemic | Advocacy as a broad mechanism for systemic change influencing population health through legislation, policy, community engagement, and media. | Bio-psycho-social, Person-centered | Social Justice, Empowerment, Collective Health | Advocacy Capacity, Public Health, Equity, Participation | Universities, Cbos, Field Training, Policy Projects And Media Advocacy | Advocacy Skills, Systemic Change, Strengthening Of Cbos | NA |
| Bogumil-Uçan & Klenk, 2020 [50] | Germany | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Health policy advisory systems | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as coalition-based policy action shaped by actor beliefs, resources, and governance structures in health digitalization. | Bio-psycho-social | Transparency, Accountability, Normative Guidance | Knowledge-Based Policy Influence, Evidence Translation, System Accountability | Policy Advisors, Scientists, Advisory Bodies, Political Decision-Makers | Conceptual Framework, Improved Understanding Of Advocacy In Policy Advisory | NA |
| Bozlak, Kenady & Becker, 2018 [51] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Childhood obesity prevention | Community, Health | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy as mobilization of community and faith-based resources to influence policy and environmental change for childhood obesity prevention. | Bio-psycho-social | Community Empowerment, Inclusion | Health Equity, Community Mobilization | Resource Assessment, Training, Stipends, Policy Messaging | Community Capacity To Engage In Advocacy | NA |
| Brender et al., 2021 [52] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education | Health, Policy | Meso | Professional | Advocacy as physician action to promote social, economic, educational, and political change to advance health and well-being. | Bio-psycho-social | Empathy, Social Justice, Civic Engagement | Student Empowerment, Health Reform | Workshops, Storytelling, Reflection Exercises | Skill Development, Attitude Change | NA |
| Brown et al., 2018 [53] | Canada | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Health education in regional medical campuses; homeless population | Health | Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy as community engagement and social accountability through research-based theatre in medical education. | Bio-psycho-social, Person-centered | Social Justice, Responsibility, Empowerment | Social Accountability, Empowerment, Education, System Responsiveness | Students, Communities, Research-Based Theater, Educational Strategies, Educational Resources | Empowerment Of Students And Professionals, Change In Perception Of Inequalities | NA |
| Bruns & Brubaker, 2022 [54] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Counseling for gun violence prevention | Policy, Health, Media | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as counselors’ systemic engagement against gun violence, guided by ACA Advocacy Competencies and CSI Wellness Competencies. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Wellness, Community Safety | Safety, Mental Health, Community Wellness | Use Of ACA Advocacy Competencies And CSI Wellness Competencies | Empowerment, Wellness Advocacy | NA |
| Carlisle, 2000 [24] | UK | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Health promotion and public health practice | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Community, Systemic | Advocacy as both case-based protection of the vulnerable and cause-based empowerment of the disadvantaged, integrated into a conceptual framework to address health inequalities. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Representation | Equity, Voice, Social Justice, Empowerment | Nurses, Health Professionals, Service Users, Community Groups | Greater Inclusion, Better Resource Allocation, Influence On Health Policy | NA |
| Carson, Hancher-rauch & Gebru, 2018 [55] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Public health student education | Health, Policy | Meso | Professional | Advocacy as a professional responsibility and skill set that public health practitioners must develop through experiential training to influence policy and improve health outcomes. | Bio-psycho-social | Civic Responsibility, Inclusion | Skill Development, Policy Literacy | Statehouse Advocacy Summit, Planning Toolkit | Increased Confidence In Advocacy Skills | NA |
| Centeno et al., 2018 [56] | Multiple countries | Report | Conceptualization/definition | Palliative care policy | Policy, Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as strategic, multi-stakeholder action to advance global palliative care, ensuring access, policy support, education, and certification. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Dignity, Care Access | Policy Integration, Resource Allocation | European Atlas Development, Partnership With EAPC And WHO | Policy Shifts, Increased Visibility Of Palliative Care | NA |
| Chenli & Abrokwah, 2021 [57] | China | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Community health volunteer organisations | Community, Health | Micro, Meso | Community, Professional | Advocacy as discretionary, voluntary public action by community health volunteers, strengthened through training, supportive relationships, and psychological empowerment. | Bio-psycho-social | Empowerment, Support, Value Creation | Empowerment, Innovation, Improved Public Service | Training Support, Supportive Relationships, Psychological Empowerment | Enhanced Advocacy Behaviours, Increased Psychological Empowerment | NA |
| Coeytaux et al. 2014 [58] | Kenya, Tanzania | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Women’s reproductive health in contexts with limited legal abortion | Community, Policy, Health | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy as community-based education and harm-reduction framing to expand access to misoprostol in restrictive legal contexts. | Bio-psycho-social | Reproductive Justice, Right To Information, Self-Determination | Access, Self-Determination, Reduction of Maternal Mortality | Cbos, Traditional Midwives, Social Media, Pharmacies, Peer-To-Peer Campaigns | Increased Access To Misoprostol, Reduced Stigma, Community Networks | NA |
| Cohen, Taveow & McGrath, 2018 [59] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Public health, community initiatives | Health, Policy, Community | Meso, Macro | Professional, Community | Advocacy as coalition-based mobilization using evidence, public opinion, and strategic campaigning to influence workplace health and safety policies. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Engagement | Policy Change, Access To Services | Community Partnerships, Strategic Messaging, Training | Improved Access, Policy Shifts, Community Empowerment | NA |
| Conrad et al., 2019 [60] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Public health system strengthening | Policy, Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as a professional competency of health promotion, defined as actions by individuals or groups to bring about social, organizational, or policy change to improve health. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Equity, Solidarity | Health Equity, Structural Change | Policy Briefs, Stakeholder Influence, Coalition Building | Improved Policy Attention To Underserved Populations | NA |
| Croft et al., 2012 [61] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Social work education | Policy, Health, Social | Meso | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as a fundamental physician role to promote social, political, and policy changes, requiring systematic curricular inclusion in medical education. | Bio-psycho-social | Self-Determination, Transparency, Inclusion | Empowerment, Participation, Structural Competence | Role-Plays, Reflective Practice, Social Justice Lens | Increased Competency In Advocacy-Related Skills | NA |
| Cropley, Hughes & Belcik, 2024 [62] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Nursing education | Policy, Health | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as nursing students’ capacity to influence health policy, strengthened by integrated curricular strategies combining leadership and population health competencies. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Inclusion, Accountability | Health Equity, Leadership | Leadership Coursework, Policy Pitch, Environmental Scan | Student Readiness, Leadership Growth | NA |
| Crosbie et al., 2024 [63] | Ethiopia | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Tobacco control policy | Health, Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as sustained transnational and local coalition action to support adoption of FCTC-based tobacco control law through evidence use, legal assistance, and media engagement. | Bio-psycho-social | Evidence-Based Policymaking, Protection From Industry Interference | Policy Adoption, Public Health Protection | FCTC Implementation, Multi-Sectoral Collaboration, Legal Reforms | Adoption Of Law 1112, FCTC Compliance | NA |
| Cullerton et al., 2018 [23] | Australia | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Public health nutrition | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as active interventions aimed at influencing government nutrition policy, supported by a conceptual model for resource-poor advocates integrating policy theories and social network insights. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Strategic Influence, Empowerment | Policy Change, Nutrition Equity | Stakeholders, Public Health Advocates, Conceptual Model | Improved Advocacy Capacity (Model Proposed) | NA |
| Damico et al., 2024 [64] | Italy | Scientific article | Measurement tool | Public health nursing | Health, Community | Meso, Macro | Professional, Community | Advocacy as a core ethical and professional practice of public health nurses, operationalised through measurable competencies (raising awareness, empowerment, policy change, collaboration). | Bio-psycho-social | Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, Autonomy | Equity, Self-Determination, Patient Protection | Scale Development, Construct Validation, Factor Analysis | Validated Scale For PHN Advocacy Practices | Public Health Nurses’ Advocacy Practices (PHNAP) Scale, 27 items; Assesses public health nurses’ advocacy practices using five factors structure: (1) Raising awareness – highlighting the challenging situations faced by disadvantaged individuals; (2) Empowerment – supporting disadvantaged individuals to autonomously improve their own situation; (3) Community and local government engagement – establishing a foundation within local governments and community groups of disadvantaged individuals to initiate advocacy activities; (4) Policy change – working toward changes in health and social policies; (5) Collaboration – engaging with stakeholders and organizations to enhance the effectiveness of advocacy activities. |
| de Bok et al., 2024 [16] | Netherlands | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Interdisciplinary medical education | Health, Community, Policy | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy as physicians’ social responsibility to promote prevention and equity, conceptualized in curricula as part of the CanMEDS “health advocate” role, taught via public health and community-based courses. | Bio-psycho-social | Inclusion, Equity, Solidarity | Systemic Awareness, Curricular Reform | Reflective Exercises, Group Dialogues, Scenario Planning | Student-Reported Advocacy Competence Increase | NA |
| Dechert 2019 [65] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Trauma surgery and health disparities | Health, Policy | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as the translation of trauma research findings into policy and community action to address social determinants of health and reduce disparities. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Advocacy As Professionalism | Health Equity, Access, Policy Reform, Social Justice | Doctors, Legislators, Researchers, Students, Academic Education | Policy Change, Education, Professional Awareness | NA |
| Del Mundo et al., 2023 [66] | Philippines | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education (mccod) | Policy, Health | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as structured educational and policy support to institutionalize correct medical certification of cause of death, framed with PRECEDE-PROCEED model. | Bio-psycho-social | Accuracy, Accountability, Health Systems Strengthening | Accurate Mortality Data, Training Quality | Training Modules, Stakeholder Engagement, Digital Learning | Reach Of 4000 Learners, Stakeholder Buy-In | NA |
| Dhaliwal et al. 2022 [67] | India | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Postgraduate medical training (residency) in healthcare | Health | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy as locally rooted and context-specific strategies informed by caregivers’ perceptions of vaccination’s health, social, and economic benefits in low-coverage areas. | Bio-psycho-social, Person-centered | Social Justice, Responsibility, Agency, Professional Ethics | Education, Social Responsibility, Health Justice, Policy Influence | Universities, Academics, Trainees, Training Programs, Evaluation Tools | Improvement In Advocacy Skills, Change In Attitudes, Systemic Impact | NA |
| Dodick et al., 2018 [68] | Multiple countries | Scientific article; Declaration | Conceptualization/definition | Headache disorders and patient care | Patient, Health, Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as collective patient-driven actions (patients, professionals, NGOs, regulators) to promote access to care, reduce stigma, and influence health policy in headache care. | Person-centered | Equity, Access, Recognition | Access To Care, Reduce Stigma, Patient-Centered Policy | Summits, Declarations, Stakeholder Collaboration | Establishment Of Global Patient Advocacy Network | NA |
| Effland et al., 2021 [69] | USA | Scientific article | Strategies/actions | Child welfare system | Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as professional and community mobilization to reform regulatory frameworks, ensuring midwives’ full scope of practice and equitable access to medicines/devices for maternal health. | Bio-psycho-social, Child and family-centeres | Social Justice, Inclusion, Professional Empowerment | Support for Vulnerable Families, Systemic Change, Equity | Social Workers, State Agencies, Trainers, Training Programs | Policy And Practice Changes In Child Welfare Systems | NA |
| Elder et al., 2007 [70] | USA | Scientific article | Measurement tool | Geriatric outpatient setting, patient safety | Patient | Micro | Self, Systemic | Advocacy conceptualized as seniors’ self-advocacy in healthcare safety—behaviors of speaking up, ensuring safe practices, actively engaging in their own care. | Bio-psycho-social | Autonomy, Responsibility, Self-Determination | Error Prevention, Empowerment, Health Safety | Elderly People, Caregivers, Healthcare Workers, Measurement Tools | Improvement In Active Participation In Health Security | Seniors Empowerment and Advocacy in Patient Safety (SEAPS), 21 items; Comprises four subscales: (1) Outcome efficacy (OE), which refers to beliefs about the effectiveness of advocacy actions in producing change; (2) Attitudes (ATT), which capture the orientation toward the importance and legitimacy of advocacy; (3) Self-efficacy (SE), which measures confidence in one’s ability to engage in advocacy tasks; (4) Behaviors (BEH), which assess the frequency and consistency of self-reported advocacy practices. |
| Evans & McGaha, 1998 [71] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Education, social work | Policy, Education | Meso | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy as actions by consumers/families (writing letters, giving testimony, engaging media, lobbying) to influence mental health policy and service delivery—framed as empowerment and equal participation. | Bio-psycho-social | Responsibility, Child-Centered Values | Child Welfare, System Reform | Training, Policy Engagement, School Collaboration | Improved Educator Awareness And System Responsiveness | NA |
| Evans, Williams & Perko, 2018 [72] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Communities, chiropractic, health promotion | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Community, Systemic | Advocacy as chiropractors’ engagement in community-level health promotion, both micro (individual counseling) and macro (policy/community environment change). | Bio-psycho-social, Person-centered | Social Justice, Community Empowerment | Community Health, Prevention, Civic Participation | Chiropractors, Local Communities, Institutions, Policymakers | Improved Community Health And Systemic Changes | NA |
| Fagen et al., 2009 [73] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Public health coalitions | Policy, Community | Meso, Macro | Systemic | Advocacy conceptualized as “a wide range of activities to influence decision makers, such as litigation, lobbying, public education, capacity building, network formation, communication, leadership development.” | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Participation | Improving Health Systems Through Nurse Engagement | Advocacy Planning Frameworks, Coalition Assessment Tools | Improved Advocacy Capacity And Strategic Alignment | NA |
| Fazelipour et al., 2023 [74] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Nursing education | Health, | Meso | Professional | Advocacy conceptualized as a health professional competency role enacted in daily practice (disease prevention, health promotion, seamless care, professional advocacy). | Bio-psycho-social | Social Responsibility, Patient Advocacy | Equity, Participation, Empowerment | Nursing Faculty, Curriculum Redesign | Improved Advocacy Competencies | NA |
| Figueira et al., 2018 [75] | Brazil | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Nursing education | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy conceptualized as defending patients’ rights, promoting autonomy, enabling user participation in health decisions, and changing social realities toward equity. | Bio-psycho-social | Ethics, Justice, Participation | Political Change, Professional Support, Social Justice | Curriculum Content, Educational Planning, Ethical Discussion | Improved Understanding Of Advocacy Roles Among Students | NA |
| Figueira et al., 2022 [76] | Brazil | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Nursing | Policy | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy conceptualized as interventions by nurses to change ineffective policies at institutional, community, or governmental level, distinct from individual health advocacy. | Bio-psycho-social | Civic Engagement, Systemic Transformation | Education, Participation, Social Change | Policy Advocacy Engagement Scale | Increased Nurse Engagement In Political Advocacy | NA |
| Figueroa & Verma, 2023 [77] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Health policy | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as constituent-driven policy action where researchers and community advocates engage policymakers through coalition-building, evidence, and science communication to achieve equitable health policies. | Person-centered | Justice, Inclusion, Responsiveness | Reach Marginalized Populations, Engage in Health Advocacy | Constituents, Coalitions, Leadership, Policy Champions | Policy Change | NA |
| Galer-Unti, Miller & Tappe 2004 [78] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Literature on health promotion and policy advocacy | Policy | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as policy advocacy in health education, operationalised through terminology and coding descriptors to analyze scientific production in CNHEO journals. | Bio-psycho-social, Person-centered | Justice, Ethics, Professional Responsibility | Patient Rights, Self-Determination, Empowerment | Professional Organizations, Scientific Journals, Training Institutions | Increased Publications On Advocacy; Change In Awareness | NA |
| Galer-Unti, Tappe & Lachenmayr, 2004 [79] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Health promotion and health education | Health | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as an intentional process to bring about social/organizational change in support of a health-related goal, with step-by-step strategies for novice advocates. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Responsibility, Ethics | Rights Protection, Quality of Care Improvement, Decision-Making Support | Individuals, Groups, Non-Profit Organizations, Health Professionals, Networks | Greater Participation Of Health Educators And Influence On Policies | NA |
| Garcia & Parker, 2011 [80] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Hiv prevention, religious communities | Health, Religion | Micro, Meso | Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as mobilization of financial, organizational, and cultural resources plus coalition-building, used by faith-based groups to influence HIV policy and prevention. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Inclusion, Equity, Community Empowerment | Health Equity, Empowerment, Legal-Health Integration | Use Of Resource Mobilization, Peer Educator Programs, National Religious Networks | Improved Outreach And Trust In HIV Prevention | NA |
| Gaylord & Grace, 1995 [81] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Nursing field, patient-nurse relationship | Patient | Micro | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as the ethical practice of nursing: protecting the vulnerable, promoting autonomy, and acting across micro–macro levels of care as part of professional duty. | Bio-psycho-social, Person-centered | Ethics, Justice, Autonomy, Compassion | Road Safety, Environmental Health, Political Change | Nurses, Patients, Healthcare Facilities | Not Explicitly Reported | NA |
| Giffords, Guercia & Kass, 2010 [82] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Mental health field, training for patient rights advocacy | Patient | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as coalition-driven legislative change, engaging stakeholders in structured steps to achieve systemic policy reform | Person-centered, Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Social Support, Inclusion | Access To Safe And Legal Abortion; Equity; Rights; Awareness | Social Workers, Students, Clinicians, Vulnerable Patients | Increased Knowledge, Improved Advocacy Capacity | NA |
| Girard et al., 2020 [83] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical-legal partnership, medical education | Health, Law, Education | Meso, Macro | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as interprofessional action (medicine + law) to remove social and legal barriers to health, embedded into medical training | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Collaboration, Empowerment | Empowerment, Awareness, Access, Policy Change | Interprofessional Training, Legislative Preparation, Medical-Legal Partnerships | Increased Medical Student Identity As Advocates, Policy Literacy | NA |
| Gomm et al., 2006 [84] | Australia | Scientific article | Strategies/actions | Advocacy campaign for sustainable transport and environmental health | Public Health, Media | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as community and organizational actions mobilized to address environmental determinants of health, emphasizing participation and empowerment. | Bio-psycho-social | Giustizia Ambientale, Partecipazione, Sostenibilità | Capacity Building, Equity, Training | Alleanze Comunitarie, Cittadini, Enti Locali, Media, Ricercatori | Riduzione Traffico Pesante, Attenzione Pubblica, Pressione Sulle Istituzioni | NA |
| Gormley, 2019 [85] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | School health, leadership education | Health, Education | Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as the nurse’s role in protecting patient dignity, rights, and preferences in end-of-life care, including systemic change and individual patient advocacy. | Bio-psycho-social | Inclusion, Equity, Empowerment | Improving Dementia Care, Systems Change | Workshops, School-Based Projects, Student Mentoring | Improved Leadership Skills And Confidence | NA |
| Hancher-Rauch, Gebru & Carons, 2019 [86] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Public health education | Health, Policy | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as a fundamental competency for public health graduates, involving the ability to influence policy, communicate effectively, and mobilize communities. | Bio-psycho-social | Civic Responsibility, Social Justice | Systemic Change, Patient-Centered Care, Policy Influence | Advocacy Projects, Legislative Visits, Simulations | Increased Knowledge And Advocacy Self-Efficacy | NA |
| Hardin-Fanning et al., 2023 [87] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Undergraduate nursing education | Health | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as a nursing skill and responsibility to engage in policy processes, trained through experiential curriculum design. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Civic Responsibility | Health Equity, Native American Youth Well-Being | Simulations, Storytelling, Reflective Assignments | Improved Advocacy Confidence And Narrative Skills | NA |
| Hatono et al., 2025 [88] | Japan | Scientific article | Measurement tool; Conceptualization/definition | Infermieristica di sanità pubblica a livello comunitario | Public Health | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Community, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as “an act taken to protect and speak up on behalf of those who are not receiving the quality of life and fairness that is guaranteed, to create change in what is causing difficulty in their situation.” | Biopsicosociale, Community-centered | Giustizia Sociale, Uguaglianza, Responsabilità Sociale | Equity, Capacity Building, Policy Change | Infermieri Di Sanità Pubblica, Enti Locali, Stakeholder | Adozione Di Buone Pratiche, Empowerment, Influenza Policy | Scale to Measure Public Health Nurses’ Advocacy Practices, 27 items; Grouped into five factors: (1) Raising awareness of the challenging situations faced by disadvantaged individuals; (2) Empowering disadvantaged individuals to improve their situation autonomously; (3) Establishing a foundation within local governments and community groups of disadvantaged individuals for advocacy initiatives, (4) Working toward policy changes; (5) Collaborating with stakeholders and organizations to enhance the effectiveness of advocacy activities. |
| Hearne, 2008 [89] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Ambito educativo e policy nei programmi di educazione alla salute | Health, Policy | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is understood as skills for translating public health science into policy action, including communication, policy analysis, and campaign strategies. | Person-centered, Bio-psycho-social | Giustizia Sociale, Equità Educativa, Empowerment | Policy Impact, Student Skill Development | Insegnanti, Policy Makers, Istituzioni Educative, Stakeholder | Miglioramento Contenuti Dei Curricula, Influenza Su Policy | NA |
| Hensel et al., 2023 [90] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education | Health, Education | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as community engagement in cancer research, bridging the gap between researchers and marginalized communities, empowering citizens as research advocates. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Professional Responsibility | Policy Improvement, Evidence-Based Impact | Workshops, Scenario-Based Learning, Role-Play | Increased Understanding Of Advocacy Role In Clinical Practice | NA |
| Hessini, 2005 [91] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Reproductive health policy globally | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as strategic action at global, national, and community levels to promote women’s rights, safe abortion, and reproductive justice, integrating public health and rights-based approaches. | Bio-psycho-social, Rights-based | Social Justice, Human Rights, Equity | Vaccine Uptake, Misinformation Reduction | Public Health Experts, Legal Advocates, Media, Health Professionals, Civil Society, Etc. | Policy Change, Increased Access, Public Awareness | NA |
| Hilliard et al., 2015 [92] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Diabetes care and policy (chronic disease) | Health | Micro, Meso, Macro | Self, Community, Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as multi-level efforts (from individual to global) to increase awareness, reduce stigma, secure funding, influence policy, and improve health outcomes for people with diabetes. | Person-centered, Public health-oriented | Empowerment, Equity, Access, Health Literacy | Health Equity, Social Determinants, Access | Individuals, Families, Community Orgs, NGOs, International Federations | Improved Outcomes, Policy Awareness, Advocacy Engagement | NA |
| Hoffman & Silverberg, 2015 [93] | Canada | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Global health education context (student training) | Global Health | Meso, Macro | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as a core skill in global health, requiring experiential education, campaign design, and coalition-building to influence health equity and policy. | Person-centered, Interdisciplinary | Social Responsibility, Equity, Empowerment | Policy Change, Clinical Awareness | Educators, Students, Civil Society, Policymakers | Empowerment, Knowledge, Skill Development, Collaboration | NA |
| Hollister et al., 2021 [94] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Health plan support for people with dementia | Policy, Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as system-level change to improve dementia care capacity, integrating evidence, stakeholder engagement, and policy leverage in managed care health plans. | Bio-psycho-social | System-Level Responsibility, Inclusiveness, Support For Vulnerable Populations | Public Health Impact, Professional Preparation | Systematic Advocacy Model With Steps: Best Practices, Public Policies, Champions, Business Case, TA, Tracking | Improved Care Pathways, Caregiver Support, CBO Referrals | NA |
| Hudson et al., 2021 [95] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Conceptualization/definition | Nursing education reform | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as youth empowerment and support for cancer patients/communities, with branches at national, community, and personal levels | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Voice, Accountability | Improved Care, Equity, Systemic Responsiveness | Revised Nursing Standards, Community Partnerships, Experiential Learning | Updated Accreditation Standards, Increased Policy Engagement | NA |
| Idoate et al., 2020 [96] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Urban native american women’s health and wellness advocacy | Community, Health, Policy | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is framed as “knowing, being, and doing” rooted in Indigenous worldviews, relationality, cultural survival, and community wellness; it extends beyond clinical care to everyday roles of Indigenous women as advocates. | Bio-psycho-social | Respect, Cultural Identity, Equity | Equity, Inclusion, Rights, Systemic Change | Community Engagement, Storytelling, Data Dissemination | Empowerment, Community Action, Youth Health Policy Proposals | NA |
| Israel et al., 2010 [97] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Community-based participatory research in public health | Community, Health | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as community-driven policy change through CBPR, requiring equitable participation, capacity building, and empowerment to address structural health disparities. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Participation, Collaboration, Empowerment | Systemic Reform, Policy Awareness, Population Health | Academic-Community Partnerships, Participatory Evaluation, Dissemination Strategies | Policy Shifts, Increased Capacity, Sustained Partnerships | NA |
| Jansson et al., 2016 [98] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Social work education | Policy, Health, | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as interventions to change dysfunctional policies in institutions, communities, or governments, contrasted with patient advocacy (direct support to individuals). | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Engagement, Rights | Empowerment, Access, Participation | Training Program, Fieldwork, Assessment Tools | Competency Improvement, Readiness For Advocacy Roles | NA |
| Jansson et al., 2017 [99] | USA | Scientific article | Measurement tool; Conceptualization/definition | Social work practice | Policy, Health | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is defined as an intervention to change dysfunctional policies affecting patients’ rights, quality, access, and well-being; contrasted with case-based patient advocacy. | Bio-psycho-social | Inclusion, Justice | Equity, Justice, Voice For Marginalized | Survey Development, Statistical Validation | Validated Advocacy Measurement Scale | Policy Advocacy Engagement Scale (Policy-AES), 7 items; Connects policy advocacy directly with seven categories of patient problems that frontline professionals encounter in daily practice: (1) Issues related to biopsychosocial functioning, (2) Person-in-environment barriers, (3) Patient rights violations, (4) Gaps in patient-centered care, (5) Deficits in cultural responsiveness, (6) Access and affordability challenges, (7) Unmet needs in mental and community-based care. |
| Jennings et al., 2024 | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Vaccine promotion and public health communication | Health, Media | Micro, Meso | Peer, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as personal (peer-to-peer) and social (public communication) efforts to persuade and mobilize people toward vaccine uptake, using narrative or factual messaging. | Bio-psycho-social | Truthfulness, Empathy, Education | Representation, Access, Transparency | Social Media Messages, Narrative/Factual Content Strategies | Increased Advocacy Intentions, Message Effectiveness | NA |
| Kaczorowski et al., 2004 [100] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Medical education and community health | Health | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as a core pediatric role involving partnership with communities and child health organizations to address “new morbidity” (social determinants, prevention, equity). | Bio-psycho-social | Civic Engagement, Equity, Justice | Equity, Access, Systems Change, Collaboration | Medical Students, Faculty, Patients, Communities | Increased Awareness, Educational Impact, Clinical Engagement | NA |
| Kalra, Verma & Sahay, 2023 [101] | India | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Non-communicable diseases, primary care | Health, Policy, Community | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as a cyclical process led by physicians and stakeholders, beginning with awareness and leading to systemic action and policy engagement for NCD control. | Bio-psycho-social | Responsibility, Awareness, Action-Oriented Mindsets | Health Equity, Empowerment, Access, Community Well-Being | 5A Model: Awareness, Acceptance, Assertion, Action, Audit | Strengthened Advocacy Cycle And Clinical Integration | NA |
| Kerr et al., 2017 [102] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Health education certification and training | Health, Policy, | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as a professional responsibility of health educators, encompassing communication, influencing policy, and promoting health systems change to benefit public health. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Responsibility, Empowerment | Reducing Disparities, Equity, Structural Competency | Survey, Training Modules, Policy Engagement | Greater Advocacy Involvement, Identified Training Gaps | NA |
| Knox et al., 2018 [103] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Primary care | Health, Community, Patient | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as physician responsibility to act on social determinants of health, combining medical practice with population health approaches to reduce inequities. | Person-centered | Justice, Empathy | Policy Change, Health Equity, Evidence-Based Practice | Clinical Vignettes, Faculty Mentorship | Reflection, Empowerment | NA |
| Krahn & Campbell, 2011 [104] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Disability rights and inclusion | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as a political and legal process through which people with disabilities and their allies influence public health systems, access to services, and participation in society, complementing public health research and surveillance. | Bio-psycho-social, Rights-Based | Social Justice, Inclusion, Empowerment | Access, Empowerment, Stigma Reduction, Trust | Policy Makers, Advocates, Legal System, NGOs | Systemic Policy Reforms, Access, Cultural Change | NA |
| Krishnamurthy, Soltany & Montez, 2023 [105] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education | Health, Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as any action by physicians to promote social, economic, educational, and political changes that reduce suffering and threats to health, making it a professional responsibility linked to both patient care and systemic reform. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Responsibility, Social Accountability | Trust Building, Access To Care, Inclusion | Physicians, Educators, Curricular Strategies | Training In Advocacy | NA |
| Kuehne et al., 2022 [106] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Refugee and immigrant health | Community | Micro, Meso | Community, Peer | Advocacy is conceptualized as healthcare providers’ active engagement in influencing policies and systems to strengthen PHC, framed as a collective responsibility across professions and countries, guided by equity, social justice, and universal health coverage principles. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Participation, Self-Determination | Policy Impact, Skills Development | Community Leaders, Health Professionals, NGOs, Refugee Groups | Community Engagement, Improved Access To Services | NA |
| Kumar, Meher & Zhang, 2025 [107] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Health policy advocacy on social media (Twitter) during COVID-19 | Policy, Health | Meso, Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as strategic communication by organized groups to influence public opinion and health policy reform, contrasting personalized, equity-driven narratives (PNHP) with data-heavy, industry-centered opposition (P4AHCF). | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Empowerment, Representation | Access, Equity, Literacy | Case Studies, Community Involvement, Stakeholder Mobilization | Awareness, Policy Attention | NA |
| Lazuka-Nicoulaud et al., 2022 [108] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Pharmaceutical policy, patient advocacy | Policy, Patient | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as a structured process of influence—grounded in evidence, awareness, stakeholder mobilization, and empowerment of decision-makers—to advance public health issues like vision care within global development goals. | Bio-psycho-social | Transparency, Patient Rights, Equity | Equity; Rights; Empowerment; Social justice | Stakeholder Engagement, Regulatory Process Involvement, Lobbying | Increased Inclusion In Drug Evaluation Processes | NA |
| Lipsky, Adams & Okeke, 2024 [109] | Nigeria | Policy report | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Universal health coverage | Health, Policy | Meso, Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as collective, networked action by civil society and stakeholders to influence government policy toward UHC, with success tied to cohesion, trust, collaboration, and transparency in advocacy coalitions. | Bio-psycho-social, Rights-Based | Social Justice, Trust, Inclusion, Transparency | Policy Change, Equity, Participation | Csos, Policymakers, Media, Academic Partners, Funders | Legislative Reform, Program Funding, Coalition Effectiveness | NA |
| Logan, 2019 [110] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Community health workers in marginalized communities | Health, Community | Micro, Macro | Community, Systemic, Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as an essential component of the CHW role, empowering clients and communities, addressing social determinants of health, and influencing systemic policies, carried out across micro (individual), macro (community/policy), and professional levels. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Empowerment, Participation, Inclusion | Safety, Empowerment, Access To Resources | Chws, Client Relationships, Advocacy Strategies, Community Coalitions, Healthcare System Integration | Client And Community Empowerment, Increased Legitimacy Of Chws, Improved Social Determinants Of Health | NA |
| Long et al., 2014 [111] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education and health disparities | Health, Education | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as a teachable skill set in medical education, combining communication and negotiation techniques with policy knowledge to empower health professionals to influence healthcare reform. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity | Environmental Change, Policy Engagement | Workshops, Reflective Writing, Narrative Analysis | Improved Structural Competency And Advocacy Mindset | NA |
| Majmundar et al., 2024 [112] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Tobacco control policy | Policy | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as evidence-based, collaborative action between researchers and advocacy organizations to shape tobacco control policy, grounded in shared values (integrity, equity, compassion, courage). | Person-centered, Evidence-based | Integrity, Compassion, Courage, Determination, Diversity | Professional Identity, Ethical Care, Rights Protection | Researchers, Advocates, Policy Makers, NGOs | Policy Influence, Informed Legislation, System Change | NA |
| Makhakhe et al., 2019 [113] | South Africa | Scientific article | Strategies/actions | Sexual and reproductive health of sex workers | Health | Micro, Meso | Peer, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as health NGOs’ role in addressing stigma, discrimination, and systemic exclusion by creating trusted, tailored, and accessible services for marginalized populations (FSWs), filling systemic gaps in healthcare. | Person-centered | Social Justice, Dignity, Non-Discrimination | Empowerment, Competence, Health Equity | NGOs, Peer Educators, Mobile Clinics, Sex Worker Communities | Increased HIV Testing, Health-Seeking Behavior, Trust | NA |
| Manze et al., 2023 [114] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Covid-19 response, immigrant health | Health, Community | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is conceived as physician and clinician action to secure access to abortion and contraception, emphasizing communication, relationship-building, and political engagement. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Cultural Humility | Policy Change, Youth Engagement | Community Health Workers, Outreach Strategies | Increased Outreach, Community Trust | NA |
| Manze et al., 2024 [115] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Public health graduate education | Policy, Health | Meso | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is defined via the AMA’s definition—“the promotion of social, economic, educational, and political changes that ameliorate suffering and contribute to human well-being.” Also operationalised as physicians’ strategic communication, media engagement, policymaking, and provision of abortion care | Bio-psycho-social | Empowerment, Transparency | Policy Change, Empowerment, Addressing Health Disparities | Advocacy Skill-Building, Community Engagement Projects | Stronger Civic Engagement And Policy Awareness | NA |
| Mashamba-Thompson, 2022 [116] | South Africa | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Diagnostics access in vulnerable populations | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy conceptualized as building “diagnostic literacy” in vulnerable populations to empower them in health-seeking and improve equitable access to diagnostics. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Accessibility, Health Justice | Empowerment, Social Justice, Health Equity | Diagnostics Literacy Advocacy Model | Improved Diagnostics Access, Reduced Mortality | NA |
| Mathur et al., 2025 [117] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Oral health at global, national, and community levels | Policy, Patient | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Community | Advocacy is defined as “the strategic effort to support, recommend, defend, or argue for a particular cause or issue to effect change.” | Person-centered, Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Sustainability, Participation, Transparency, Empowerment, Collaboration | Rights, Well-Being, Health Equity | Multi-Stakeholder Coalitions; Economic Argumentation; Data And Emotional Appeals; Use Of Lived Experiences; Oral Health Diplomacy; Cross-Sectoral Partnerships; Community Leader Empowerment; Policy Framing; Commercial Determinant Regulation; Climate And Planetary Health Integration. | Ten Actionable Recommendations For Sustainable Oral Health Advocacy; Strengthening Coalitions; Greater Policy Influence; Inclusion Of Oral Health In Sustainability And UHC Agendas; Improved Oral Health Equity. | NA |
| McCall et al., 2005 [118] | Canada | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Public health education | Health,Policy | Meso | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy conceptualized as networking and coalition-building at international and community levels to support school health promotion and influence policy | Person-centered, Policy-oriented | Social Responsibility, Justice, Empowerment | Awareness, Equity In Care | Students, Educators, Public Health Professionals | Increased Competence, Confidence, Policy Engagement | NA |
| McFarlane & Wiist, 1997 [119] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Abuse prevention among pregnant women | Health, Community | Micro, Meso | Peer, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as support and referral work by community-based “mentor mothers” for abused pregnant women, combining empowerment with systemic linkage | Bio-psycho-social | Safety, Empowerment, Support | Policy Change, Health Equity, Awareness | Mentor Mother Model, Home Visits, Community Referrals | Referral Success Rates, Maternal Health Outcomes | NA |
| McPherson et al., 2012 [120] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Childhood obesity prevention | Policy, Community | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy defined as “speaking on behalf of a group of people within the public sphere around a particular issue.” | Bio-psycho-social | Engagement, Social Change | Protecting Rights, Ensuring Equitable Care Access | Be Our Voice Training, Advocacy Resource Guide | Improved Advocacy Knowledge, Intent To Engage | NA |
| Midik & Coskum, 2018 [121] | Turkey | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Nursing education | Health | Micro, Meso | Professional | Advocacy as an “action by a physician to promote those social, economic, educational, and political changes that ameliorate the suffering and threats to human health and well-being.” And CanMEDS framework—physicians contribute expertise to improve health. | Bio-psycho-social | Ethics, Responsibility, Justice | Cultural Sensitivity, Equity, Patient-Centered Care | Case-Based Teaching, Curriculum Integration | Stronger Sense Of Advocacy Among Students | NA |
| Miller et al., 2022 [122] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education in immigrant/refugee health | Health | Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy conceptualized as equipping healthcare providers with competencies to act on behalf of immigrant and refugee populations, combining education, compassion, and systemic change | Person-centered | Social Justice, Compassion, Equity | Epistemic Justice, Rights Protection | Educators, Modular Curriculum, Interactive Activities, Consortium Platform | Increased Competency, Comfort, Motivation To Care | NA |
| Millstein et al., 2016 [123] | USA | Scientific article | Measurement tool; Conceptualization/definition | Community-based health initiatives | Community, Health | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy refers to the process of increasing support for, recommending, and arguing to promote a cause or policy.” | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Youth Empowerment | Promoting Child Advocacy, Cultural Competence | Training In Media, Organizing, Policy Messaging | Policy Proposals, Youth Participation | Youth Advocacy Scales (YEAH! program), ≈40 items across multiple subscales; The instrument operationalises advocacy through three broad domains: mediators (such as empowerment, self-efficacy, and advocacy skills), intervention processes (including group participation, adult leadership, and collective climate), and proximal outcomes (youth-led actions and policy or environmental changes). |
| Minkler, Griffin & Wakimoto, 2020 [124] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Community-based participatory research | Community, Policy | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is presented as organized, evidence-based policy action led by community-based organizations and formerly incarcerated people to transform structural inequities, drawing on Kingdon’s streams model to frame public health advocacy for decarceration during COVID-19 | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Participation | Policy Reform, Maternal Safety | Community Organizing, Partnership Building, Policy Engagement | Policy Influence, Community Capacity, Sustained Partnerships | NA |
| Miranda, Garcia-Ramirez & Albar-Marin, 2020 [125] | Spain | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Roma communities, ethnic minorities | Community | Meso, Macro | Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as “meaningful community advocacy,” an empowerment process rooted in psycho-political empowerment at intrapersonal, organizational, community, and institutional levels. It emphasizes Roma communities’ leadership, building critical awareness, alliances, and capacity to enact transformative policies for health equity. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Empowerment, Anti-Discrimination | Systemic Change, Access To Trauma-Informed Care | Photovoice, Asset Mapping, Community Agents | Policy And Social Change | NA |
| Moledina et al., 2024 [126] | Canada | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education and resident competency | Health, Policy | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is framed as a core CanMEDS physician competency involving social accountability and responsiveness to patients’ lived experiences and structural determinants of health, taught via experiential learning (“Health Advocacy Day”) to bridge the gap between clinical training and real-world inequities. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Accountability, Advocacy, Equity | Influence Public Policy, Tobacco Advertising Regulation | Physicians, Canmeds Framework, Training Gaps, Systemic Change | Enhanced Preparedness, Competency Frameworks, Systemic Change | NA |
| Morelli et al., 2023 [127] | USA | Report | Curriculum/training | Medical education, disability care | Health, Patient | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is understood as equipping future healthcare professionals with awareness, skills, and empathy to address systemic inequities faced by persons with disabilities. It emphasizes both patient-centered care and structural change, operationalised through immersive training that includes direct interaction with persons with disabilities and assistive technologies. | Person-centered | Equity, Inclusion, Awareness | Access, Equity, Destigmatization, Quality Of Life | Medical Students, Simulation Sessions | Improved Confidence And Understanding | NA |
| Morris et al., 2019 [128] | Canada | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Public health, nursing education | Health, Policy | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is defined as the actions of parents, providers, and health systems to secure appropriate care, resources, and recognition for children with medical complexity. It is both a personal/family practice and a systemic effort to influence healthcare and policy structures for equity in access and support. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Civic Engagement, Responsibility | Empowerment, Improved Health Services Access | Experiential Course, Advocacy Campaign, Media Outreach | Improved Confidence, Public Engagement | NA |
| Nedjat-Haiem et al., 2013 [129] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | End-of-life care for latino patients | Health | Micro, Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as actions by health professionals—especially social workers—to address gaps in care, protect rights, and empower vulnerable Latino patients at the end of life. It emphasizes advocacy as both clinical navigation and systemic change for equitable palliative care access. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Dignity, Patient-Centeredness | Empowerment, Political Action, Behavior Change | Care Coordination, Provider Education, Role Clarification | Improved Support In Terminal Care Decision-Making | NA |
| Noh, 2024 [130] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Nursing education for north korean defectors | Health, Community | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is framed as INGOs’ global political action to promote health justice during COVID-19. It is defined through framing theory as shaping public health agendas with human rights, evidence, and equity frames to counter vaccine nationalism, structural injustice, and market-driven inequities. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Respect, Person-Centeredness | Community Engagement, Policy Change | Nursing Students, Cultural Education, Empathy-Based Strategies | Increased Student Awareness, Improved Cultural Competence, Preparedness For Advocacy | NA |
| Newbigging & Riley, 2018 [131] | UK | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Mental health | Health, Legal, Social | Micro, Meso | Professional | Advocacy is theorized as a liberatory practice aimed at redressing epistemic injustices in mental health. Independent advocacy is framed as enabling marginalized voices to be heard, countering systemic silencing, and creating epistemic justice by validating lived experience within inequitable health systems. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Knowledge, Human Rights | Cancer Awareness, Stakeholder Mobilization | Interviews, Service User Feedback | Epistemic Recognition, Voice To Service Users | NA |
| Pak-Gorstein et al., 2018 [132] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education, global health | Health | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as a professional responsibility of pediatricians to address child health beyond clinical care. It is framed as collaborative, community- and globally-oriented action for systemic child health equity, taught through immersive training (domestic and global) integrating clinical, community, and policy perspectives. | Bio-psycho-social | Cultural Sensitivity, Equity, Advocacy Awareness | Policy Change, Systemic Support For Marginalized Youth | Interactive Curriculum, Global Case Studies, Simulations | Improved Self-Efficacy In Advocacy Roles | NA |
| Payne et al., 2018 [133] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Maternal health and policy | Health, Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as patient-driven collective action to increase disease awareness, ensure earlier diagnosis, and push for equitable treatment access in FH. It emphasizes the interconnection of patient empowerment, professional partnerships, and political influence to achieve systemic change. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Safety, Collaboration | Health Equity, Empowerment, Improved Access, Job Success | Stakeholder Mapping, Agenda Setting, Coalition Building | Legislation Introduced, Public Awareness Increased | NA |
| Pickover et al., 2020 [134] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Clinical psychology, trauma services | Health, Health | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as systematic efforts to ensure just distribution of privileges, opportunities, and resources in society, requiring engagement across multiple ecological levels (micro to macro). It frames advocacy as a core professional competency for behavioral health providers. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Empowerment, Equity | Empowerment, Inclusion, Rights, Personal Development | Case Illustrations, Reflection On Power And Privilege | Conceptual Framework For Advocacy Roles | NA |
| Pierce, Stafford & Daube, 2017 [135] | Australia | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Public health, tobacco control | Policy, Media | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is framed as using media, community engagement, and policy influence to promote independent regulation of alcohol advertising, challenging industry self-regulation. | Bio-psycho-social | Transparency, Public Protection | Capacity Building, Professional Development | Media Strategy Analysis, Public Campaigns | Policy Change, Reduced Tobacco Exposure | NA |
| Potter & Beal-Stahl, 2024 [136] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Access to menstrual products, public health | Health | Meso | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is understood as health professionals leveraging education, research, and policy engagement to address inequities in menstrual product access and combat stigma. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Transparency | Social Justice, Access To Care, Policy Change, Service Improvement | Pharmacists, Education, Cost Analysis, Health Communication | Access To Products, Quality Of Life Improvement, Stigma Reduction | NA |
| Puschel et al., 2024 [137] | Chile | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Primary care, community health, cancer care | Community, Policy | Micro, Meso | Community | Advocacy is defined as “the process of arguing and/or acting in support of a particular cause, policy or group of people” and further conceptualized across practice, community, and policy domains, with competencies in knowledge, skills, and values. | Person-centered, Bio-psycho-social | Participation, Equity, Health Rights | Equity, Access, Empowerment, Systems Change | Community Workshops, Participatory Planning | Enhanced Community Involvement, Service Adaptation | NA |
| Ramirez et al., 2006 [138] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Tobacco control among youth | Policy | Macro | Community, Systemic | Defines policy advocacy as “individual and group actions to influence public policies by writing and/or speaking in person or by other medium in support of an issue at a societal level”. Tobacco control policy advocacy is specified as “actions to support public policies to reduce tobacco use or exposure to environmental tobacco smoke”. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Empowerment, Agency | Child Rights, Service Access, Systemic Change | Youth, Self-Efficacy Theory, Training, Measurement Tools | Increased Advocacy Self-Efficacy, Reduced Tobacco Use | NA |
| Raskob et al., 2024 [139] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Internal medicine residency | Health, Community | Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as community-engaged action, with physicians joining community partners in identifying health needs and pursuing systemic change through shared activism. | Person-centered | Equity, Inclusion, Shared Leadership | Rights, Access, Equity, Public Health | Partnership With Cbos, Advocacy Day, Skills Workshops | Increased Confidence And Advocacy Skills | NA |
| Reams, Odedina & Pressey, 2013 [140] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Cancer programs in Africa | Health, Media | Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as efforts to promote awareness, mobilize communities, and influence policy through media to advance cancer programs in Africa. | Bio-psycho-social | Empowerment, Information Access, Equity | Health Promotion, Equity, Cancer Prevention | Media Use, Training Workshops, Community Engagement | Increased Visibility And Prioritization Of Cancer Programs | NA |
| Reed, Fitzgerald & Bish, 2018 [141] | Australia | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Youth justice and disability services | Policy, Legal, Health | Meso, Macro | Systemic | Nursing advocacy as “action taken to support the health goals of people at the levels of the person, the community and the health system.” Also interpreted as promoting rights, values, and self-determination in end-of-life care. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Inclusion, Rights, Fairness | Empowerment, Participation, Inclusion, Social Change | Policy Analysis, Service Frameworks, Inter-Agency Collaboration | Increased Inter-Agency Support, Improved Service Alignment | NA |
| Rice & Wicks, 2007 [30] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Health promotion for welfare recipients | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is conceptualized as a nursing approach to health promotion that addresses not only individual health but also social determinants (poverty, homelessness, violence, illiteracy) that hinder engagement in health. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Empowerment, Prevention, Equity | Equity, Access, Systemic Reform | Nurses, Health Promotion Programs, Policy Advocacy, Community Participation | Improved Health Outcomes, Greater Job Success, Potential For Economic Independence | NA |
| Ridley, Newbigging & Street, 2018 [142] | UK | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Mental health | Health, Social, Health | Micro, Meso | Self, Peer, Professional | Advocacy is framed as supporting people to have a voice, safeguarding rights, redressing unequal power relations, and enabling empowerment and self-advocacy. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Empowerment | Advocacy Skill-Building, Lifelong Engagement | Focus Groups, Service User Involvement, Feedback Loops | Empowerment, Increased User Involvement, Change In Treatment | NA |
| Rivera et al., 2016 [143] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Student training, public health education | Health, Education | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is framed as a professional responsibility for health education specialists, aligned with credentialing standards. It is conceived as both a skill set to be taught (communication, legislative engagement, everyday advocacy) and a behavior shaping intention to act for health-related change. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Responsibility, Civic Engagement | Health Equity, Access, Rights | Advocacy Workshops, Policy Simulation Exercises | Increased Intent To Engage In Advocacy Post-Graduation | NA |
| Romero, Kwan & Chavkin, 2013 [144] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Maternal, child, and reproductive health policy | Policy, Public Health | Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is understood as the integration of empirical evidence into public health action and policy change, rooted in social justice. It is conceptualized as bridging rigorous research with social change, requiring researchers to embrace advocacy as an appropriate professional role while maintaining methodological rigor. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Scientific Integrity, Equity, Evidence-Based Policy | Policy and Environmental Change | Empirical Studies, Simulated Calls, Surveys, Interviews, Congressional Briefings, Collaboration With Advocacy Groups | Policy Impact, Service Access Changes, Legislative Influence | NA |
| Roy et al., 2024 [145] | India | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Community-based medical education | Policy, Health | Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is framed as system-level mobilization for policy and health system change, emphasizing multi-sectoral collaboration, evidence synthesis, and consensus-building to reduce preventable mortality from trauma. It is less individual-centered and more structural/systemic. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Accountability, Transparency, Equity | Systemic Change, Accountability, Cross-Sector Engagement | Educators, Community Health Needs Assessment, Participatory Training Models | Community Engagement, Improved Health Services | NA |
| Rudolf et al., 1999 [146] | UK | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Paediatrics and public health | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is defined operationally as addressing child health problems where the system fails, requiring political or professional action. It is conceptualized as both individual (clinical support for patients) and collective (community/national policy) responsibility of paediatricians. | Person-centered, Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Equity, Responsibility | Policy Prioritization, Awareness, Structural Change | Clinicians, Clinical Diary Logs, Community Planning | Improved Services, Child Health, Political Engagement | NA |
| Schorn, 2005 [147] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Policy change on emergency contraception access | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized through the Advocacy Coalition Framework—coalitions of diverse actors mobilizing around shared beliefs to influence policy. Here, advocacy is both grassroots (women’s groups) and systemic (legislative action). | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Autonomy, Health Equity | Equity, Influence, Systemic Transformation | Women’s Health Safety Network, Coalition Building, Policy Lobbying | Legislation Proposed, Raised Awareness, Education | NA |
| Selig et al., 2005 [148] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Comprehensive cancer control (ccc) policy strategy | Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is defined as “the act or process of supporting a cause or a proposal”, and interpreted as a central mechanism to shape cancer control policy through mobilization, lobbying, and public engagement. It is positioned as indispensable for advancing comprehensive cancer control. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Accountability, Justice, Transparency | Equity, Inclusion, Mentorship, Visibility | Public-Private Partnerships, Coalition Building, Legislative Action | Policy Gains, Increased Funding, Expanded Programs | NA |
| Servaes & Malikhao, 2010 [149] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Health communication and empowerment programs | Health, Media | Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as participatory-based communication for social change, integrating interpersonal, media, and policy dimensions. It is seen as multidirectional (not only lobbying but also listening, empowering, and mobilizing communities) within broader health communication systems. | Bio-psycho-social | Empowerment, Participation, Equity | Support, Empowerment, Competency Development | Participatory Communication, Media Strategies, Local Empowerment Projects | Increased Participation, Community Agency, Inclusion Of Marginalized Voices | NA |
| Shah & Lou, 2024 [150] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Health policy and equity in oral health | Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as a synergistic partner to quality improvement (QI). It frames advocacy as policy work that creates enabling environments (e.g., Medicaid coverage for donor milk) while QI operationalizes these changes locally. Advocacy is thus seen as systemic leverage to translate policy into improved patient outcomes. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Inclusion, Transparency | Ethical Collaboration, Transparency, Effective Treatment Access | Policy Briefs, Legislative Action, Stakeholder Engagement | Improved Access, Policy Change, Stakeholder Coordination | NA |
| Shankar et al., 2022 [151] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education, public health | Health, Policy | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as a physician’s professional responsibility to engage in social and public health issues, requiring structured training. Here, it is community-centered, stressing relational accountability, mentorship, and long-term engagement with marginalized groups. | Bio-psycho-social | Engagement, Equity, Accountability | Community Change, Policy Support, Senior Health Equity | Fellows, Mentors, Community Experts | Increased Knowledge And Motivation | NA |
| Sharp et al., 2008 [152] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Medical education, health disparities | Health/Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is interpreted as a deliberate, evidence-informed effort by health professionals to influence policy and social determinants of health, positioned at the interface of science, ethics, and political action. | Person-centered, Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Professionalism, Responsibility | Empowerment, Participation, Leadership, Social Justice | Medical Educators, Training Modules, Competencies | Improved Competence, Physician Engagement | NA |
| Shilton, 2006 [153] | Australia | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Physical activity promotion, policy change | Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is seen as social action primarily aimed at effecting changes in legislation, policy, and environments that support healthy living, with WHO definition cited (1995). Interpreted as a systemic, policy-oriented instrument of health promotion, moving beyond individual behavior. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Systems Change, Equity | Educazione, Consapevolezza, Coinvolgimento Nei Policy-Making | Health Professionals, Coalitions, Intersectoral Partnerships | Legislative/Policy Support, Environmental Change | NA |
| Shilton & Milton, 2024 [154] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Global physical activity and health policy | Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is framed as a mix of science and art: using data, evidence, and systems knowledge (science) together with persuasion, relationships, and communication (art). ISPAH illustrates global advocacy as coordinated, long-term mobilization to raise the political profile of physical activity in global policy. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Urgency, Responsibility | Policy Change, Awareness, Integration Of Cessation Practice In Ophthalmology | ISPAH, WHO, Advocacy Toolkit, Policy Briefs | Global Charter Recognition, Multisectoral Collaboration | NA |
| Shneyderman, 2024 [155] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Public health education | Health, Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is presented as one of the main strategies of health promotion, ethically grounded in social justice, aiming both to influence policy and to empower individuals/communities. It encompasses lobbying, media advocacy, and grassroots mobilization. | Bio-psycho-social | Equity, Communication, Leadership | Policy Change, Rural Health Equity, Sustainability | Coursework, Storytelling, Stakeholder Outreach | Increased Confidence In Advocacy, Community Engagement | NA |
| Smith, Artunduaga & Kotsenas, 2023 [156] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Medical professional practice and inclusion | Health | Micro, Meso | Self, Professional | Advocacy (from the Latin “advocare” that literally means to “add” a “voice”) is “any action that pleads for a cause, recommends or defends an action, or supports others or even ourselves.” It is everyday practice that can be small, intentional actions within clinical, educational, or institutional contexts—not only political lobbying. | Bio-psycho-social | Diversity, Inclusion, Empowerment, Intentionality | Social Justice, Systemic Change, Professional Development | Personal Strategies, Mentorship Structures, Institutional Recognition | Personal And Professional Development, Increased Advocacy Skills | NA |
| Soklaridis et al., 2018 [157] | Canada | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Psychiatric training | Health | Micro, Meso | Professional, Self, Peer | Advocacy is a broad spectrum of relational actions—extending from self-advocacy to advocacy within the physician–patient relationship, the health team, and the community. Defined in Canadian CanMEDS framework as physicians contributing expertise and influence to improve health by working with patients, communities, or populations. | Bio-psycho-social | Voice, Empathy, Empowerment | Health Governance, Evidence-Informed Policymaking | Narrative Training, Reflective Writing, Feedback | Greater Empathy, Advocacy Awareness In Psychiatry Residents | NA |
| Stein et al., 2018 [158] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Rare disease treatment development | Patient | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is organizational action by patient groups to influence research, clinical trials, and policy—ensuring ethical, transparent, trust-based relationships with industry to support patients. Seen as a bridge between patients and biopharma. | Person-centered | Trust, Responsibility, Transparency, Patient Centrality | Autonomy, Participation, Informed Decision-Making | Patient Organizations, Biopharma Companies, Expert Panels, Guidelines | Improved Collaborations, Ethical Standards, Clearer Patient Involvement Roles | NA |
| Steinman et al., 2017 [159] | USA | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | State-level policy advocacy for breastfeeding-friendly legislation | Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional, Community, Systemic | Advocacy is interpreted as coalition-based mobilization where groups with shared beliefs push for policy changes. Seen as political and organizational action to promote breastfeeding-supportive environments, requiring framing, coalition-building, and anticipating opposition. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Inclusion, Civic Engagement | Learning, Strategy Refinement, Accountability, Reflection | Community Agencies, Public Health Workers, Students, Cross-Sector Coalitions | Policy Impacts, Empowerment Of Communities, Advocacy Skill Development | NA |
| Story et al., 2018 [160] | USA | Scientific article | Strategies/actions | HIV prevention | Policy | Micro, Meso | Peer, Community | Advocacy is coalition-driven social and political action to advance harm reduction policies (e.g., syringe decriminalization, naloxone access). Conceptualized as collective advocacy for marginalized populations, aiming to shift criminalization frameworks toward public health protection. | Bio-psycho-social | Social Justice, Equity, Participation | Patient Health, Health Equity, Policy Change | Youth Leaders, Adult Allies, Community Organizations | Leadership Development, Increased Community Engagement, System Awareness | NA |
| Talmon et al., 2020 [161] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical education, training pathologists in health policy | Health, Policy | Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as a professional obligation of physicians, including pathologists, to act as “faithful witnesses” to the real-world consequences of legislation and regulation, and to work through professional societies and policy processes to influence health policy in ways that improve patient care. | Person-centered | Educazione, Partecipazione, Responsabilizzazione Professionale | Health Equity, Systemic Change, Global Solidarity | Facoltà, Residenti, Società Professionali, Test Pre/Post, Incontri Educativi | Aumento Conoscenza, Comprensione Ruolo Advocacy, Interesse Futuro | NA |
| Thornton et al., 2007 [162] | UK | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Smoking-related eye disease awareness and policy change | Health, Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as coordinated actions to influence policy, public opinion, and institutional priorities for cancer prevention and control, drawing from examples in tobacco, alcohol, obesity, and screening. | Biomedical | Public Awareness, Prevention, Accountability | Curriculum Innovation, Professional Responsibility, Systems Change | Ophthalmologists, Optometrists, Policy Makers, Media, Public Health Units, NGOs | Awareness Increase, Policy Recommendations, Inclusion Of Warning Labels On Cigarette Packs | NA |
| Tsatali et al., 2024 [163] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Dementia care and support | Health, Policy | Meso, Macro | Peer, Community, Systemic | Advocacy framed as youth-driven efforts to raise awareness, mobilize peers, and influence European tobacco policies, integrating civic engagement and health promotion. | Bio-psycho-social | Inclusion, Compassion, Equity, Human Dignity | Equity, Rights, System Change | Peer Support Workers, Caregivers, NGOs, Health Professionals | Increased Quality Of Life, Reduced Isolation, Improved Support Delivery | NA |
| Tuli et al., 2024 | Ireland | Policy report | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Rural health policy and gp sustainability | Policy, Health | Meso, Macro | Community, Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as collective rural GP and community mobilization to protect healthcare access, counter “structural urbanism,” and influence health system policy, with campaigns such as “No Doctor, No Village.” | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Equity, Collective Action | Empowerment, Autonomy, Rights | Public Campaigns, Community Organizing, Political Engagement | Policy Reinstatement, Funding Restoration, Increased Rural Access | NA |
| Twis, Cimino & Files, 2022 [164] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Strategies/actions | Social work education, youth anti-sex trafficking program | Policy | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is defined as equipping medical trainees with legal and systemic tools to advocate for patient rights and address social determinants of health through interprofessional collaboration. | Bio-psycho-social | Justice, Empowerment, Social Responsibility | Trust, Health Promotion, Participation | Advocacy Courses, Experiential Learning, Political Involvement | Enhanced Competence, Increased Engagement In Advocacy Roles | NA |
| Uzochukwu et al., 2020 [165] | Nigeria | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Health system strengthening | Health, Policy | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is defined as actions enabling social voice, alliance-building, and accountability to prioritize maternal and child health services in policy agendas; both representational and facilitative advocacy are described. | Bio-psycho-social | Accountability, Participation, Collaboration | Empowerment, Inclusion, Service Improvement | Stakeholder Engagement, Capacity Building, Use Of Evidence | Policy Uptake, Improved Health System Responsiveness | NA |
| Vahdat et al., 2015 [166] | Iran | Scientific article | Measurment tool | Chronic patient self-advocacy | Patient | Micro | Self | Advocacy as patients’ active participation in health decision-making, asserting needs, preferences, and rights through communication and informed engagement. | Person-centered | Bioethical Principles, Autonomy, Participation, Respect | Policy Awareness, Anti-Smoking, Youth Involvement | Patients, Healthcare Providers, Scale Designers | Improved Communication, Informed Choices, Autonomy | Patient Self-Advocacy Scale (PSAS) – Persian validated version, 12 items; Assesses patients’ capacity to advocate for their own health needs across three domains: (1) Illness education (knowledge acquisition and provider communication); (2) Assertiveness (confidence in expressing needs and asking questions); (3) Mindful non-adherence (reasoned refusal of recommendations inconsistent with preferences or values). |
| van Oort et al., 2023 [167] | Netherlands | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Global health advocacy program evaluation | Policy, Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy as diverse NGO activities (educating, mobilizing, agenda setting, policy monitoring) and framed as a dynamic process requiring participatory evaluation to strengthen effectiveness. | Bio-psycho-social | Learning, Transparency, Accountability | Engagement, Policy Change Awareness | Participatory Evaluation, Advocacy Tools, Stakeholder Engagement, NGOs | Enhanced Evaluation Practice, Improved Advocacy Strategies, Stakeholder Learning | NA |
| Vance & Kennedy, 2020 [168] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training; Conceptualization/definition | Psychiatric residency education | Health | Micro, Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is defined as physicians’ public support for patient health causes, encompassing policy influence, insurer engagement, and social determinants. | Bio-psycho-social | Professional Responsibility, Equity, Patient-Centeredness | Equity; Rights; Empowerment; Social justice | Didactic Sessions, Experiential Learning (E.G., Legislative Visits), Mentorship | Improved Advocacy Competence, Curriculum Development | NA |
| Vervoot et al., 2021 [169] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Global health and surgery equity, pediatric cardica surgery in LMICs | Policy, Health | Macro | Systemic | Health advocacy as “activities aimed at influencing decisions within political, economic, and social systems”. Advocacy as coordinated stakeholder engagement and messaging to influence domestic and global health policy for congenital heart disease and rheumatic heart disease, aiming at equity in surgical care. | Person-centered, Equity-focused | Social Justice, Equity, Inclusion, Solidarity | Equity; Rights; Empowerment; Inclusion | NGOs, Global Health Actors, Academic Community | Policy Inclusion, Funding Prioritization, Systemic Visibility | NA |
| Walker et al., 2024 [170] | Multiple countries | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Prison health, advocacy for hepatitis C testing and treatment scale-up | Health | Meso, Macro | Professional, Systemic | Advocacy is understood as mobilizing policymakers, prison systems, and stakeholders to ensure equitable access to HCV testing and treatment in prisons, reducing health disparities and supporting WHO elimination goals. | Bio-psycho-social | Collaboration, Justice, Person-Centered Care | Equity; Rights; Participation; Empowerment; Accountability | Co-Designed Curricula, Interprofessional Collaboration, Clinical Integration | Increased Readiness For Advocacy Roles, Systemic Awareness, Interprofessional Competence | NA |
| Warren, Markovic & Manderson, 2006 [171] | Australia | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition | Rural women with gynecological health issues | Lay-Health, Patient | Micro, Meso | Self, Peer | Advocacy as lay-health action by rural women to improve reproductive health services, categorized into typologies (advocacy-seekers, providers, storytellers). | Bio-psycho-social, Person-centered | Social Justice, Equity, Inclusion | Empowerment, Supporto, Rappresentanza, Riduzione Stigma | Rural Women, Storytellers, Social Networks, Support Groups | Reduction Of Isolation, Empowerment, Institutional Recognition | NA |
| Waterston, 2002 [172] | UK | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Children’s health and social policy | Health | Macro | Systemic | Advocacy is framed as the duty of pediatricians to speak on behalf of children and families, ensuring their rights and needs are recognized. It spans both individual support (helping patients navigate health and social systems) and systemic influence (shaping policy, legislation, and services). | Person-centered, Rights-based | Social Justice, Child Rights, Ethical Duty | Equity; Rights; Empowerment; Participation | Health Professionals, Policy Makers, Child Health Organizations | Influence On National And International Child Health Policy | NA |
| Whittaker, 2003 [173] | Thailand | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Abortion law reform advocacy | Health, Policy | Micro, Meso | Systemic | Advocacy is conceptualized as a process of enabling voice and influence in public health, where professionals translate evidence into policy change. It is grounded in equity and representation of marginalized groups, requiring communication and alliance-building. | Bio-psycho-social | Care Ethics, Empowerment, Dignity | Rights; Equity; Empowerment; Participation | Evidence generation, Political lobbying, Coalition building, Media engagement, Framing strategies | Increased Awareness And Skill Among Nursing Students | NA |
| Williams et al., 2023 [174] | Guatemala | Scientific article | Conceptualization/definition; Strategies/actions | Vaccine confidence and local advocacy | Health | Micro, Meso | Community, Peer, Systemic | Advocacy is seen as community-based action to promote vaccination, rooted in trust, local leadership, and collective responsibility. It emphasizes mobilizing voices at the grassroots level to support immunization programs and reduce barriers. | Bio-psycho-social | Trust, Responsibility, Equity | Equity in Health Access, Community participation, Empowerment of local voices | Religious Leaders, Community Members, Health Workers | Increased Vaccine Confidence, Influence Of Local Leaders | NA |
| Yang et al., 2011 [175] | China | Scientific article | Strategies/actions | Tobacco control education | Health | Meso | Professional, Community | Advocacy is defined as students’ ability to act for tobacco control through knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. It combines policy engagement, awareness raising, and professional responsibility, making advocacy a core skill for future public health practitioners. | Bio-psycho-social | Civic Engagement, Health Promotion, Responsibility | Equity; Empowerment; Participation; Rights (protection from secondhand smoke) | Public Health Students, Schools Of Public Health, Training Program | Increased Advocacy-Related Attitudes And Behaviors (Not Smoking) | NA |
| Yu et al., 2022 [176] | USA | Scientific article | Curriculum/training | Medical training during covid-19 | Health | Micro, Meso | Professional | Advocacy is conceptualized as health professionals’ engagement in advancing equitable care through education, organizational involvement, and influencing policy. It reflects a competency that bridges clinical expertise with systemic health change. | Bio-psycho-social | Awareness, Civic Duty | Equity; Participation; Empowerment; Rights (policy engagement in pandemic response) | Virtual Advocacy Day, Evaluation Survey | Greater Advocacy Interest And Intention | NA |
Domains of application and advocacy typologies
The application of advocacy described in the documents included was wide-ranging. A substantial proportion of the literature examined advocacy in medical and health professional education, often in relation to undergraduate curricula or postgraduate training programs. Other works explored advocacy in public health promotion, targeting domains such as tobacco control, lifestyle modification, and health communication. Specific health policy areas were also well represented, particularly maternal and child health, mental health advocacy focusing on stigma reduction and access to care, and advocacy for the prevention and management of chronic conditions, including diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Alongside these more established domains, several studies investigated community-driven initiatives and patient-focused advocacy, reflecting advocacy’s diverse applications across health systems.
Regarding categories, the studies demonstrated an emphasis on health advocacy and policy advocacy, with several documents combining different forms into hybrid approaches that integrated policy, health, legal, and community perspectives. Analysis of the level at which advocacy was enacted revealed that meso-level efforts (n = 103; 70.5%), such as those directed at institutions and organizations, and macro-level activities (n = 92; 63.1%) aimed at systemic and policy reform, were predominant. Micro-level advocacy (n = 41; 28.1%), typically involving individual professionals or small groups, was less frequently reported. Similarly, the categorization by form of advocacy indicated that systemic (n = 91; 62.3%) and professional (n = 88; 60.3%) approaches were most common, while community-based (n = 53; 36.3%) initiatives were less represented. A smaller subset of publications addressed peer (n = 10; 6.8%) or self-advocacy (n = 7; 4.8%), highlighting the breadth but also the uneven emphasis across advocacy practices.
Conceptualization and definitions of advocacy
Most of the included studies provided an explicit conceptualization of advocacy. Commonly, advocacy was framed as a deliberate and purposeful effort to influence health determinants, professional practice, and policy agendas. A recurrent element in many definitions was the reference to social justice, equity, empowerment, and human rights as values underpinning advocacy activities. In several cases, this orientation was linked to a bio-psycho-social understanding of health, highlighting the interplay between social, political, and biomedical determinants.
Several authors presented advocacy as an ethical responsibility intrinsic to the role of health professionals, while others underscored its multidisciplinary and context-sensitive character, adapting across domains and professional fields. Some contributions were domain-specific, linking advocacy to areas such as maternal and reproductive health or nursing practice. At the same time, a number of studies pointed to the need for greater conceptual and operational clarity, particularly in distinguishing advocacy from overlapping practices such as leadership, communication, or patient representation. Despite this, many studies offered explicit definitions.
Illustrative definitions included, for instance, descriptions of advocacy as “the active support of a cause through diverse strategies (speaking, writing, mobilization) to improve health policy and equity” [47] or as “a professional responsibility” [55, 102, 105, 132, 143] to speak and act on behalf of patients and communities in pursuit of equity. Other authors described advocacy as “enabling marginalized voices to be heard” [131], underscoring its function of amplifying marginalized perspectives. Several studies highlighted advocacy as “a collective and organized effort to secure political and financial support for evidence-based health interventions” [41] while others defined it as “an act taken to protect and speak up on behalf of those who are not receiving the quality of life and fairness that is guaranteed” [88]. In more domain-specific framings, advocacy was conceptualized as “a core ethical and professional practice of public health nurses, operationalized through measurable competencies” [64], or as “actions by consumers and families—writing letters, giving testimony, engaging media, lobbying—to influence mental health policy and service delivery” [71].
Taken together, these definitions reveal both the technical-operational side of advocacy—mobilizing resources, building coalitions, engaging media, using legal frameworks—and its ethical dimension, rooted in justice, equity, and professional duty. They also show that advocacy may be framed as a broad systemic endeavor (“a wide range of activities to influence decision makers, such as litigation, lobbying, public education, capacity building” [73]) or as locally grounded, relational work (“community engagement and social accountability through research-based theatre in medical education” [53]). Overall, this diversity of framings is consistent with the coding in the extraction table under the variables “Advocacy conceptualization”, “Implicit health vision”, and “Underlying values”, where social justice, empowerment, and ethical duty were among the most frequently reported anchors.
Strategies and actions in advocacy practice
The literature provided rich descriptions of the strategies and actions through which advocacy is implemented. Commonly reported practices included the formation of coalitions and stakeholder networks, the mobilisation of legal and policy tools, and the strategic use of media and narrative framing to shape public and political discourse. Several studies highlighted grassroots mobilisation and community engagement as central to advocacy efforts, particularly in contexts of health inequities and vulnerable populations. Educational approaches and participatory mechanisms were also frequently described, reinforcing advocacy as both a technical and a social process.
The goals associated with these strategies ranged from improving access to healthcare and protecting individual rights to promoting institutional accountability, systemic reform, and community empowerment. Many studies underscored the interdependence of these goals, suggesting that effective advocacy is not limited to discrete outcomes but rather contributes to broader transformations in health systems and policy environments.
These strategies and goals were directly aggregated from the extraction table categories “Operational components” and “Advocacy goals” where coalition-building, media engagement, and empowerment consistently emerged as dominant themes across literature.
Measurement and evaluation of advocacy
Despite the broad emphasis on strategies and outcomes, only a minority of studies (n = 6; 4.1%) reported the use of instruments to measure advocacy processes or impacts. These tools included locally developed surveys, simulation-based assessments, and qualitative interviews, often tailored to specific educational or community contexts. None of the included documents employed standardized or validated instruments applicable across settings. This finding highlights a significant methodological gap, as advocacy remains largely under-evaluated in terms of its effectiveness and impact on health outcomes.
Beyond formal measurement, many studies described expected or reported outcomes. These included increased awareness of rights among patients or communities, greater institutional accountability, enhanced participation and empowerment, and, in some cases, the integration or reform of health programs and policies. However, such outcomes were typically presented narratively rather than supported by systematic evaluation.
Overall, the evidence indicates that while advocacy is often assumed to contribute to meaningful social and health change, the lack of robust and standardized evaluation frameworks limits the ability to compare across settings or to establish its effectiveness with confidence.
These findings were drawn from the extraction table variables “Measuring instruments” and “Expected/reported outcomes”, which confirm the scarcity of validated instruments and the reliance on narrative accounts of change.
Discussion
This scoping review sought to clarify how advocacy is defined, conceptualized, and operationalised within public health and healthcare literature in democratic societies. Across the 146 included studies, three broad findings stand out. First, advocacy is consistently described as a multidimensional and dynamic practice that adapts to changing social, institutional, and political contexts. Second, while advocacy is widely invoked as a driver of equity and systemic transformation, its conceptualization remains fragmented and inconsistently operationalised across domains. Third, despite the strategic importance attributed to advocacy, robust and validated approaches to training and evaluation are still scarce. Together, these findings confirm that advocacy is both central to contemporary health systems and under-theorized as a professional and civic practice.
While its manifestations vary across disciplines and domains, the literature consistently portrays advocacy as a deliberate, value driven process oriented toward systemic change, social justice, and the redistribution of power in health systems. This normative orientation toward empowerment and participation is consistent with recent work emphasising that equity-oriented action in health systems must be deliberate and co-produced with affected communities, rather than treated as an incidental by-product of innovation or service design [11]. These are foundational principles of health equity, which seek to address avoidable, unfair, and remediable differences in health outcomes across population groups [3, 8]. Our findings resonate with Carlisle’s [24] conceptual framing of advocacy as a central function of health promotion, aimed at challenging inequities and amplifying marginalized voices, and with more recent work emphasizing its inherently normative character, in which advocacy is simultaneously a professional duty and a form of civic engagement [5, 26].
The review also demonstrates that advocacy is not static but evolves alongside transformations in healthcare governance, patient–professional relationships, and public expectations. In line with the results, we observed that the diversification of advocacy models reflects broader contextual changes, such as the expansion of patient and community agency, the politicization of health disparities, and the global movement toward participatory health systems [10, 177]. These findings also mirror themes raised in the introduction, where advocacy was situated within global shifts in philanthropy, human rights, and civil society mobilisation [13, 14]. In this sense, advocacy emerges as an adaptive practice, responsive to emergent equity challenges such as digital divides, environmental crises, and declining trust in science and institutions [14, 178].
Our results confirm that relational and communicative competencies—including storytelling, negotiation, public speaking, and media engagement—are widely recognised as core enablers of advocacy effectiveness, particularly in contexts where policy and public discourse shape the distribution of health opportunities [179, 180]. At the micro level, qualitative evidence further shows that communicative practices are not neutral transmission tools, but relational mechanisms that can either support or undermine engagement, trust, and perceived agency. For instance, studies on clinical documentation highlight how language, tone, and co-designed formats function as extensions of the clinical relationship and shape patients’ capacity to participate meaningfully in care and decision-making [181]. Yet, only around one-third of the studies reported specific tools for measuring advocacy, and these were predominantly context specific and rarely validated. This confirms the gaps noted in the introduction regarding the absence of coherent evaluation frameworks and limits the ability to demonstrate advocacy’s concrete contributions to equity—a gap also highlighted in recent methodological reviews [182]. Recent scoping work further suggests that these evaluation challenges stem less from definitional plurality than from the lack of shared operational anchors across levels and settings, underscoring the need for frameworks that balance conceptual coherence with contextual adaptability [183]. Importantly, the conceptual fluidity of advocacy does not preclude meaningful evaluation. Rather than requiring a single, fixed definition, evaluation can be anchored in relatively stable elements identified across the reviewed literature—such as core equity-oriented values, levels of action, and functional mechanisms through which advocacy seeks to influence health systems and outcomes.
In health and care settings, the case for evidence based advocacy as a driver of equity is compelling. Evidence based advocacy integrates the best available research with contextual knowledge and stakeholder perspectives to ensure that strategies are not only ethically justified but demonstrably effective in reducing disparities [2, 184]. Without such grounding, advocacy risks reproducing existing inequities, misdirecting scarce resources, and losing legitimacy among the communities it seeks to serve. Conversely, when advocacy is guided by robust evidence and equitycentred principles, it can directly inform prioritysetting, strengthen accountability, and promote structural change in health systems [3]. This aligns with educational research showing the need to embed advocacy skills into curricula for health professionals, thus bridging the gap between theory and practice.
The blueprint for equity-oriented advocacy presented below is grounded in the patterns that emerged from the analysis of the included literature. Specifically, it synthesises recurrent conceptual, normative, and operational elements identified across the reviewed papers, translating these shared features into an integrative and practice-oriented framework. Each component of the blueprint reflects domains that were consistently emphasised across the analysed studies, including the normative grounding of advocacy, its multi-level orientation, the centrality of relational and communicative practices, and the limited but emerging attention to evaluation and accountability.
A distinctive contribution of this review lies in its integration of the conceptual synthesis into a structured, equityoriented advocacy framework. The conceptual framework was developed through iterative thematic analysis, moving from descriptive coding of advocacy definitions, values, and practices, to the development of higherorder conceptual categories that captured crosscutting dimensions relevant to health equity. This approach allowed us to map not only the content of advocacy (what it is) but also the processes through which it operates (how it is enacted) and the levels at which it exerts influence (where it acts).
Unlike previous conceptual models, which have often focused on either representational or structural dimensions of advocacy, our framework explicitly integrates normative, relational, and evaluative components into a single equity-oriented structure. This makes it both conceptually comprehensive and practically applicable across different health system contexts. By consolidating these dimensions, we formulated a preliminary blueprint for evidencebased, equityoriented advocacy in health. This conceptual integration is represented in Fig. 2, which depicts the Pyramid Model of Equity-Oriented Advocacy.
Fig. 2.
Conceptual framework for equity-oriented public health advocacy. Reflexive professional role and civic engagement are shown as enabling individual-level capacities that originate at the micro level and support advocacy across meso and macro domains, rather than as a distinct level of action
Clarification is warranted regarding the positioning of “Reflexive Professional Role and Civic Engagement” within the framework presented in Fig. 2. This dimension is not conceived as a separate level of advocacy action, but rather as a set of individual capacities that are primarily enacted at the micro level. At this level, reflexive professionalism refers to critical self-reflection on one’s professional or civic role, ethical awareness of inequities encountered in everyday practice, and recognition of advocacy as a legitimate responsibility. These reflexive processes shape how individuals interpret their power, responsibilities, and opportunities for action, thereby enabling engagement in collective (meso-level) and policy-oriented (macro-level) advocacy. In this sense, reflexive professional role and civic engagement function as enabling conditions that sustain advocacy across levels, rather than as an independent layer of action.
The model illustrates how normative foundations, relational practices, and evaluative mechanisms build progressively from micro to macro levels, highlighting advocacy’s role as a systemic equity driver.
The blueprint bridges the gap between conceptual understanding and practical implementation, providing a translational tool that can guide:
Policy formulation, by articulating advocacy’s role in addressing structural determinants of health;
Training and professional development, by identifying core competencies and reflective practices;
Evaluation, by proposing accountability mechanisms and measurable indicators aligned with equity outcomes.
The framework positions advocacy as a systemlevel change agent and explicitly links it to the redistribution of power, participatory governance, and the pursuit of fair health opportunities. While designed to be adaptable to different health system contexts, its normative grounding in justice and equity makes it particularly relevant for settings aiming to institutionalise advocacy as part of health system governance. The six components of this blueprint—along with their definitions, operational implications, and explicit links to equity—are summarized in Table 2, which is intended as a practical reference for policymakers, educators, and practitioners seeking to integrate advocacy systematically into public health action. Whereas Table 2 details the operational implications of each component, Fig. 2 provides a visual synthesis of their hierarchical and interconnected structure. By making explicit the connections between these recurring findings and the proposed components, the blueprint offers a structured synthesis of the existing literature rather than a prescriptive model detached from it. To support interpretation of this framework, Table 2 provides an expanded description of each component, detailing its operational implications and explicit linkages to equity, including the micro-level processes underlying the “reflexive professional role and civic engagement” dimension.
Table 2.
Preliminary blueprint for equity-oriented advocacy in health: components, operational implications, and equity linkages
| Blueprint component | Definition | Operational implications | Equity linkage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normative grounding | Advocacy anchored in principles of social justice, equity, solidarity, and human rights. | Guides value-based decision-making and priority setting in advocacy actions. | Ensures that advocacy efforts focus on reducing avoidable and unjust health disparities. |
| Multilevel orientation | Advocacy action spanning individual, organizational, community, and policy levels. | Supports the design of interventions that address health determinants across interconnected system layers. | Enables action on inequities at both micro (patients and communities) and macro (institutions and policies) levels. |
| Relational & communicative practices | Use of storytelling, negotiation, alliance-building, and strategic communication. | Strengthens influence, fosters partnerships, and mobilizes stakeholders and coalitions. | Amplifies marginalized voices and improves representation in decision-making spaces. |
| Critical & systemic literacy | Ability to analyse social and structural determinants of health, power relations, and governance processes. | Enables informed, context-sensitive, and strategically targeted advocacy actions. | Directs attention toward structural drivers of health inequities rather than individual deficits. |
| Reflexive professional role and civic engagement (Micro level) | Individual capacity for critical self-reflection on one’s professional or civic role, ethical responsibility, and positionality in relation to communities and systems. | Supports ethical awareness, role clarity, and recognition of advocacy as part of everyday professional or civic practice; prepares individuals to engage in collective and policy-oriented advocacy. | Promotes inclusive and participatory approaches grounded in lived experience and community priorities. |
| Evaluation & accountability mechanisms | Development and use of tools and indicators to assess advocacy processes and outcomes. | Facilitates transparency, learning, and continuous improvement of advocacy strategies. | Ensures accountability and demonstrable impact on equity-relevant outcomes. |
Strengths and limitations
The strengths of this review include its interdisciplinary scope, which integrates conceptual and applied evidence from medicine, nursing, public health, policy studies, and the social sciences, and its inclusion of diverse geographical perspectives that broaden the interpretive lens. This breadth allows for a nuanced understanding of how advocacy contributes to advancing equity across varying sociopolitical contexts. However, certain limitations must be acknowledged: the restriction to English-language peer-reviewed literature may have excluded valuable contributions from the Global South; the heterogeneity of definitions and frameworks required interpretative synthesis; and the reliance on published studies may under-represent informal, community-driven advocacy efforts. Furthermore, the predominance of cross-sectional evidence across the included studies restricts insights into the longitudinal impacts of advocacy initiatives. Importantly, this limitation does not reflect an absence of empirical engagement with advocacy, but rather the predominance of conceptual, descriptive, or qualitatively informed accounts, alongside a relative scarcity of studies employing standardized, comparative, or outcome-oriented evaluative designs. Despite these limitations, the interdisciplinary scope and integration of diverse perspectives ensure that the findings remain directly relevant to policymakers, educators, and practitioners seeking to institutionalise advocacy as a lever for equity.
Future research should focus on codeveloping theorydriven, equityfocused frameworks that can guide both implementation and evaluation of advocacy across health systems. Longitudinal, participatory research is needed to assess how advocacy efforts influence equity trajectories over time. Importantly, the creation of validated, transferable evaluation tools will be critical for demonstrating how advocacy impacts structural determinants of health. By embedding equity as a central criterion for assessing success, the field can move toward a coherent, accountable, and evidenceinformed approach to advocacy that supports more inclusive, just, and resilient health systems.
Conclusion
This review offers a systematic, interdisciplinary analysis of how advocacy is conceptualized, theorized, and operationalised across public health, clinical practice, education, and social science domains in democratic contexts. Taken together, our findings underline advocacy’s dual character as both professional competency and civic practice, oriented toward addressing structural determinants of health and redistributing power. The proposed framework provides a blueprint for integrating equity-oriented advocacy into policy, practice, education, and evaluation.
Future research should focus on the co-development of theory-driven, equity-focused frameworks and validated evaluation tools, as well as on participatory approaches that center the voices of marginalized communities. By embedding equity as both a guiding principle and an evaluative criterion, advocacy can move from fragmented practice toward a coherent, evidence-informed, and accountable force for systemic transformation.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to the members of the ELPA Board (Julio Burman, Milan Mishkovikj, Dr. Tove Frisch Ph.D, Ivana Dragojević, Prof. Dr. Gamal Shiha MD) for their valuable contributions to refining the methodological approach. Their expertise and perspectives have substantially enhanced the rigour, policy relevance, and applicability of the findings to equity oriented advocacy in public health.
Abbreviations
- ACA
American Counseling Association
- AMA
American Medical Association
- CBPR
Community-Based Participatory Research
- CBO
Community-Based Organization
- CSI
Chi Sigma Iota (Counseling Academic & Professional Honor Society)
- ELPA
European Liver Patients’ Association
- FH
Familial Hypercholesterolemia
- JBI
Joanna Briggs Institute
- NGO
Non-Governmental Organization
- PRISMA-ScR
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews
- SEAPS
Seniors Empowerment and Advocacy in Patient Safety
- UHC
Universal Health Coverage
- WHO
World Health Organization
- YEAH
Youth Engagement and Action for Health
Author contributions
Michela Monaci: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – Original Draft; Marko Korenjak: Resources, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing, Patient advocacy Supervision; Beatrice Credi: Resources, Writing – Review & Editing, Patient advocacy Supervision; Sarah Bigi: Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; Serena Barello: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing.
Funding
This review was conducted within the framework of the ICONIC project, which was funded through an unrestricted educational grant provided by European Liver Patients’ Association (ELPA). The funding body had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The data extraction table and related materials are available from the corresponding author only upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable. This study is a systematic review of published literature and did not involve human participants or the collection of identifiable personal data.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Farrer L, Marinetti C, Cavaco YK, Costongs C. Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review. Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):392–437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flavel J, Freeman T, Musolino C, Baum F. Health promotion and the need to accelerate advocacy for health equity. Health Promot Int. 2024;39(3):daae040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.WHO. Framework on integrated, people-centred health services [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2016. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/252698.
- 4.Sykes S, Watkins M, Wills J. Public health practitioners as policy advocates: skills, attributes and development needs. Health Promot Int. 2023;38(5):daad102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.de Leeuw E. The rise of the consucrat. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020;10(4):176–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brownson RC, Fielding JE, Maylahn CM. Evidence-based public health: a fundamental concept for public health practice. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:175–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Woodall JR, Warwick-Booth L, Cross R. Has empowerment lost its power? Health Educ Res. 2012;27(4):742–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Goes AR. Advocacy for health and health equity: a call to public health professionals. Port J Public Health. 2025;43(1):1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Scott MD, McQueen S, Richardson L. Teaching health advocacy: a systematic review of educational interventions for postgraduate medical trainees. Acad Med. 2020;95(4):644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kickbusch I, Gleicher DE. Governance for health in the 21st century [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. 2012. https://repository.graduateinstitute.ch/record/279386.
- 11.Barello S, Monaci M. Patient-centered Innovation must include people with disabilities. JAMA Pediatr. 2025;179(8):927–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Baldwin MA. Patient advocacy: a concept analysis. Nurs Stand. 2003;17(21):33–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Friedman EA, Gostin LO, Buse K. Advancing the right to health through global organizations: the potential role of a framework convention on global health. Health Hum Rights. 2013;15(1):E71–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Labonté R, Ruckert A. Health Equity in a globalizing era: past challenges, future prospects. Oxford University Press; 2019. p. 465. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Cohen BE, Marshall SG. Does public health advocacy seek to redress health inequities? A scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(2):309–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.de Bok FE, Hermans J, Duvivier RJ, Wolff D, Reijneveld SA. Conceptualization and teaching health advocacy in undergraduate medical education: a document analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gandra EC, da Silva KL. Teaching Strategies for health advocacy for undergraduate nursing students: a scoping review. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2023;44(2):92–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schneider GE, DiOrio A, Asada Y, Hearne SA. Charting the advocacy landscape: a qualitative content analysis of syllabi in public health graduate education. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(3):325–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schaaf M, Fox J, Topp SM, Warthin C, Freedman LP, Robinson RS, et al. Community health workers and accountability: reflections from an international “think-in”. Int J Equity Health. 2018;17(1):66, s12939-018-0781-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cannon YZ. How is access to legal resources and advocacy foundational to health justice? AMA J Ethics. 2024;26(8):E596–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). Foundations of Health Promotion [Internet]. Toronto: Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). 2023. https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/Documents/F/2023/focus-on-foundations-health-promotion.pdf.
- 22.Jenkins JC. Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy. In: The Nonprofit Sector: a research Handbook. 2nd ed. Yale University Press; 2006. p. 307–31.
- 23.Cullerton K, Donnet T, Lee A, Gallegos D. Effective advocacy strategies for influencing government nutrition policy: a conceptual model. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carlisle S. Health promotion, advocacy and health inequalities: a conceptual framework. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(4):369–76. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Christoffel KK. Public health advocacy: process and product. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(5):722–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Farias ODO, Fontenele MGM, Lima FET, Galvão MTG, da Silva VM, Lopes MVDO. Analysis of the health advocacy concept from the perspective of the evolutionary method. Rev Esc Enferm Usp. 2023;57:e20230170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, Brownson RC. Bridging research and practice: models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(3):337–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Haby MM, Reveiz L, Thomas R, Jordan H. An integrated framework to guide evidence-informed public health policymaking. J Public Health Policy. 2025;46(1):193–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pérez LM, Martinez J. Community health workers: social justice and policy advocates for community health and well-being. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(1):11–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Rice MC, Wicks MN. The importance of nursing advocacy for the health promotion of female welfare recipients. Nurs Outlook. 2007;55(5):220–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Whitsel LP, Honeycutt S, Radcliffe R, Johnson J, Chase PJ, Noyes P. Policy implementation and outcome evaluation: establishing a framework and expanding capacity for advocacy organizations to assess the impact of their work in public policy. Health Res Policy Sys. 2024;22(1):27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Porritt K, Pilla B, Jordan Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. 2024 edition. Adelaide, Australia: JBI; 2024.
- 33.Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA, 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abdikeeva A, Covaci A. The Impact of legal advocacy strategies to advance Roma health: the case of macedonia. Health Hum Rights. 2017;19(2):99–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Abdikeeva A, Ezer T, Covaci A. Assessing legal advocacy to advance Roma health in Macedonia, Romania, and Serbia. Eur J Health Law. 2013;20(5):471–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Aliani R, Dreiling A, Sanchez J, Price J, Dierks MK, Stoltzfus K. Health advocacy and training perceptions: a comparison of medical student opinions. MedSciEduc. 2021;31(6):1951–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Anselin E, Chisholm D, Sheehan K, Doobay-Persaud A. The community health advocacy Initiative: a longitudinal experiential curriculum in community engagement for preclerkship medical students. MedEdPORTAL. 2024;11415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 41.Babu AS, Thomas RJ, Isaranuwatchai W, Herdy AH, Hoch JS, Grace SL. Advocacy for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation globally in conjunction with the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (ICCPR). BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bachofer S, Velarde L, Clithero A. Laying the foundation. Am J Preventative Med. 2011;41(4):S312–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Banas JR, Gershon S. A biblioguidance approach to fostering students’ self-efficacy to advocate for health. Ped Health Promot. 2024;10(1):63–70. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Belkowitz J, Sanders LM, Zhang C, Agarwal G, Lichtstein D, Mechaber AJ, et al. Teaching health advocacy to medical students: a comparison study. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014;20(6):E10–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Bernard C, Soklaridis S, Paton M, Fung K, Fefergrad M, Andermann L, et al. Family physicians and health advocacy is it really a difficult fit? Can Fam Physician. 2019;65(7):491–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Bhattarai J, Bentley J, Morean W, Wegener ST, Pollack Porter KM. Promoting equity at the population level: putting the foundational principles into practice through disability advocacy. Rehabil Phychol. 2020;65(2):87–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bhatti AJ, Lin S, Post D, Baldock K, Dawes N. Prevalence and characteristics of advocacy curricula in Australian public health degrees. Health Prom J Aust. 2022;33(S1):50–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bhojani U, Venkataraman V, Manganawar B. Challenging ties between state and tobacco industry: advocacy lessons from India. Health promotion perspectives [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2025 Sep 13]. http://journals.tbzmed.ac.ir/HPP/Abstract/HPP_20130727104256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Blenner SR, Lang CM, Prelip ML. Shifting the culture around public health advocacy: training future public health professionals to be effective agents of change. Health Promot Pract. 2017;18(6):785–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bogumil-Uçan S, Klenk T. Varieties of health care digitalization: comparing advocacy coalitions in Austria and Germany. Rev Policy Res. 2021;38(4):478–503. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bozlak CT, Kenady JM, Becker AB. Assessing and mobilizing faith organizations to implement childhood obesity prevention advocacy strategies. Health Promot Pract. 2018;19(5):724–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Brender TD, Plinke W, Arora VM, Zhu JM. Prevalence and characteristics of advocacy curricula in U.S. Medical Schools. Acad Med. 2021;96(11):1586–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Brown A, Ramsay N, Milo M, Moore M, Hossain R. How research-based theatre is a solution for community engagement and advocacy at regional medical campuses: the Health and Equity through Advocacy, Research, and Theatre (HEART) program. Can Med Ed J. 2018;9(1):e6–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Bruns KM, Brubaker MD. Counselor advocacy against gun violence: a systemic perspective with advocacy and wellness competencies. J Counselor Leadersh Advocacy. 2022;9(1):45–56. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Carson A, Hancher-Rauch HL, Gebru Y. Building advocacy capacity and Skills through a Statehouse advocacy day: Indiana SOPHE experience. Health Promot Pract. 2018;19(6):803–06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Centeno C, Sitte T, De Lima L, Alsirafy S, Bruera E, Callaway M, et al. White paper for global palliative care advocacy: recommendations from a PAL-LIFE expert advisory group of the Pontifical Academy for Life, Vatican City. J Palliative Med. 2018;21(10):1389–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Chenli M, Abrokwah E. Training and support relationship influences on volunteers’ public advocacy behaviours: their mediation by psychological empowerment. J Phychol Africa. 2021;31(4):430–33. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Coeytaux F, Hessini L, Ejano N, Obbuyi A, Oguttu M, Osur J, et al. Facilitating women’s access to misoprostol through community-based advocacy in Kenya and Tanzania. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):53–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Cohen AC, Tavrow P, McGrath MR. Advocacy coalition for safer sex in the adult film industry: the case of Los Angeles County’s measure B. Health Promot Pract. 2018;19(3):400–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Conrad EJ, Becker M, Brandley E, Saksvig E, Nickelson J. Advocacy and public policy perceptions and Involvement of college health promotion students. Health Promot Pract. 2019;20(5):730–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Croft D, Jay SJ, Meslin EM, Gaffney MM, Odell JD. Perspective: Is it time for advocacy training in medical education? Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1165–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Cropley S, Hughes M, Belcik K. Qualitative analysis of an integrated curricular strategy to develop health policy advocacy. Nurse Educ. 2025;50(1):46–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Crosbie E, Edison K, Maclean V, Moges D, Fuss C, Muggli ME, et al. Adopting a WHO framework convention on tobacco control-based tobacco control law in Ethiopia: sustained transnational health advocacy and multi-sectoral institutionalized support. IJERPH. 2024;21(3):280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Damico V, Ferri A, Demoro G, Cossalter L, Murano L, Fermi L, et al. Reliability and validity of a scale to measure public health nurses’ advocacy practices in Italy. A validation study. Igiene e Sanità Pubblica. [PubMed]
- 65.Dechert T. Translational research: turning research into advocacy. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):e000416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Del Mundo PFA, Dela Luna NYO, Amoranto AJ, Gaspar MJPO, Sumalo JAO, Angeles KAT, et al. A PRECEDE-PROCEED approach in the advocacy for computer-based education on correct medical certification of cause of death among physician-learners. Acta Med Philipp. 2022;57(8):25–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Dhaliwal BK, Rattani A, Chandrashekhar R, Bloom DE, Shet A, Seth R. Caregiver perceptions of the broader societal benefits of vaccination: a path toward sustainable vaccine advocacy in India. SSM - Qual Res Health. 2022;2:100156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Dodick D, Edvinsson L, Makino T, Grisold W, Sakai F, Jensen R, et al. Vancouver declaration on global headache patient advocacy 2018. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(13):1899–909. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Effland KJ, Hays K, Zell BA, Lawal TK, Grantham RL, Koontz M. Increasing access to medications and devices for the care of low-risk childbearing families: an analysis of existing law and strategies for advocacy. J Midwife Womens Health. 2021;66(5):604–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Elder NC, Regan SL, Pallerla H, Levin L, Post D, Cegela DJ. Development of an instrument to measure seniors’ patient safety health beliefs: the Seniors Empowerment and Advocacy in Patient Safety (SEAPS) survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1–3):100–07. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Evans CJ, McGaha AC. A survey of mental health consumers’ and family members’ involvement in advocacy. Community Ment Health J. 1998;34(6). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 72.Evans MW, Williams RD, Perko M. Public health advocacy and chiropractic: a guide to helping your community reach its health objectives. J Chiropr Med. 2008;7(2):71–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Fagen MC, Reed E, Kaye JW, Jack L. Advocacy evaluation: what it is and where to find out more about it. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10(4):482–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fazelipour M, Dhatt A, Sun T, Nemir A, Wilbur K. Pharmacy students practicing health advocate competency roles in workplace-based training. Am J Pharm Educ. 2023;87(9):100118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Figueira AB, Barlem ELD, Tomaschewski-Barlem JG, Dalmolin GDL, Amarijo CL, Ferreira AG. Actions for health advocacy and user empowerment by nurses of the family health strategy. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2018;52:e03337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Figueira AB, Barlem ELD, Brum AN, Mattos LM, Barlem JGT, Toescher AMR. Clustering the engagement of Brazilian nurses in political advocacy. Rev Bras Enferm. 2022;75(1):e20210105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Figueroa R, Verma R. Constituent-driven health policy informed by policy advocacy literature. Transl Behav Med. 2023;13(5):338–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Galer-Unti RA, Miller SM, Tappe MK. A content analysis of the CNHEO journals for policy and advocacy articles: 1991-2000. Am J Health Educ. 2004;35(1):30–36. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Galer-Unti RA, Tappe MK, Lachenmayr S. Advocacy 101: getting started in health education advocacy. Health Promot Pract. 2004;5(3):280–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Garcia J, Parker RG. Resource mobilization for health advocacy: Afro-Brazilian religious organizations and HIV prevention and control. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(12):1930–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Gaylord N, Grace P. Nursing advocacy: an ethic of practice. Nurs Ethics. 1995;2(1):11–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Giffords ED, Guercia R, Kass D. A model for change: legislative advocacy to improving access for the uninsured and underinsured in New York State 1. J Community Pract. 2010;18(1):5–18. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Girard VW, Moore ES, Kessler LP, Perry D, Cannon Y. An Interprofessional approach to teaching advocacy skills: lessons from an academic medical-legal partnership. J Legal Med. 2020;40(2):265–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Gomm M, Lincoln P, Pikora T, Giles-Corti B. Planning and implementing a community-based public health advocacy campaign: a transport case study from Australia. Health Promot Int. 2006;21(4):284–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Gormley JM. School nurse advocacy for student health, safety, and school attendance: impact of an educational activity. J Sch Nurs. 2019;35(6):401–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Hancher-Rauch HL, Gebru Y, Carson A. Health advocacy for busy professionals: effective advocacy with little time. Health Promot Pract. 2019;20(4):489–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hardin-Fanning FD, Hartson K, Lynette G, Gesler R, Kern N. Socioecological analysis of a nursing advocacy skills-building activity. J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(9):509–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hatono Y, Suzuki H, Shimazu T. Developing a scale to measure public health nurses’ advocacy practices in group and community settings in Japan. Public Health Nurs. 2025;42(1):161–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Hearne SA. Practice-based teaching for health policy action and advocacy. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(2_suppl):65–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Hensel B, Askins N, Ibarra E, Aristizabal C, Guzman I, Barahona R, et al. Florida-California Cancer Health Equity Center (CaRE2) community scientist research advocacy program. J Canc Educ. 2023;38(5):1429–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Hessini L. Global progress in abortion advocacy and policy: an assessment of the decade since ICPD. Reprod Health Matters. 2005;13(25):88–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Hilliard ME, Oser SM, Close KL, Liu NF, Hood KK, Anderson BJ. From individuals to international policy: achievements and ongoing needs in diabetes advocacy. Curr Diab Rep. 2015;15(9):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Hoffman SJ, Silverberg SL. Training the next generation of global health advocates through experiential education: a mixed-methods case study evaluation. Can J Public Health. 2015;106(6):e442–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hollister BA, Yeh J, Ross L, Schlesinger J, Cherry D. Building an advocacy model to improve the dementia-capability of health plans in California. J Am Geriatrics Soc. 2021;69(12):3641–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Hudson L, Prichard C, Weiss LT, Ickes MJ, Vanderford NL. Training appalachian Kentucky youth cancer advocates. South Med J. 2021;114(6):356–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Idoate R, Desmarais MM, Strong B, Steinhoff A, Tamayo L, Carroll G, et al. An indigenist theory of health advocacy. Great Plains Res. 2020;30(1):35–48. [Google Scholar]
- 97.Israel BA, Coombe CM, Cheezum RR, Schulz AJ, McGranaghan RJ, Lichtenstein R, et al. Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating Health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(11):2094–102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Jansson BS, Nyamathi A, Heidemann G, Bird M, Ward CR, Brown-Saltzman K, et al. Predicting levels of policy advocacy engagement among acute-care health professionals. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2016;17(1):43–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Jansson BS, Nyamathi A, Heidemann G, Duan L, Kaplan C. Validation of the policy advocacy engagement scale for frontline healthcare professionals. Nurs Ethics. 2017;24(3):362–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kaczorowski J, Andrew Aligne C, Halterman JS, Allan MJ, Aten MJ, Shipley LJ. A block rotation in community health and child advocacy: improved competency of pediatric residency graduates. Ambul Pediatr. 2004;4(4):283–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Kalra S, Verma M, Sahay R. The 5A model for non-communicable disease advocacy. J Pak Med Assoc. 2023;73(5):1132–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kerr DL, Van Wasshenova E, Mahas R, Everhart FJ, Thompson A, Boardley D. Advocacy and public policy perceptions and involvement of master certified health education specialists. Health Promot Pract. 2017;18(5):706–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Knox KE, Lehmann W, Vogelgesang J, Simpson D. Community Health, Advocacy, and Managing Populations (CHAMP) longitudinal residency education and evaluation. J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2018;5(1):45–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Krahn G, Campbell VA. Evolving views of disability and public health: the roles of advocacy and public health. Disabil Health J. 2011;4(1):12–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Krishnamurthy S, Soltany KA, Montez K. Incorporating health policy and advocacy curricula into undergraduate medical education in the United States. J Med Educ Curric Devel. 2023;10:23821205231191601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kuehne F, Kalkman L, Joshi S, Tun W, Azeem N, Buowari DY, et al. Healthcare provider advocacy for primary health care strengthening: a call for action. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022;13:21501319221078379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kumar S, Meher S, Zhang P. Public health advocacy in times of pandemic: an analysis of the medicare-for-all debate on Twitter during COVID-19. Behav Sci. 2025;15(2):223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lazuka-Nicoulaud E, Naidoo K, Gross K, Marcano Williams J, Kirsten-Coleman A. The power of advocacy: advancing vision for everyone to meet the sustainable development goals. Int J Public Health. 2022;67:1604595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Lipsky A, Adams M, Okeke C. Ground-truthing social network analysis for universal health coverage advocacy networks in Nigeria [Internet]. RTI Press. 2024 May [cited 2025 Sep 13]. https://www.rti.org/rti-press-publication/ground-truthing-social-network-analysis-universal-health-coverage-advocacy-networks-nigeria. [PubMed]
- 110.Logan RI. Being a community health worker means advocating. Anthropol Action. 2019;26(2):9–18. [Google Scholar]
- 111.Long T, Chaiyachati KH, Khan A, Siddharthan T, Meyer E, Brienza R. Expanding health policy and advocacy education for graduate trainees. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(3):547–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Majmundar A, Xue Z, Asare S, MacMahon C, Callaway C, Lacasse L, et al. An advocacy-research collaboration model to inform evidence-based tobacco control efforts. Tob Control. 2024;33(e2):e270–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Makhakhe NF, Meyer-Weitz A, Struthers H, McIntyre J. The role of health and advocacy organisations in assisting female sex workers to gain access to health care in South Africa. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Manze M, Romero D, Kwan A, Ellsworth TR, Jones H. Physician perspectives of abortion advocacy: findings from a mixed-methods study. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2023;49(1):7–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Manze M, Kwan A, Jones H, Roberts L, Romero D. Sexual and reproductive health advocacy successes, failures, and needs in the United States: perspectives from key stakeholders. Health Promot Pract. 2024;25(2):183–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Mashamba-Thompson TP. Diagnostics literacy advocacy model for vulnerable populations. Diagnostics. 2022;12(3):716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Mathur MR, Bhosale AS, Abel SN, Fisher J, Listl S, Carrasco-Labra A, et al. Envisioning sustainable oral health through effective advocacy. BMC Glob Public Health. 2025;3(1):15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.McCall DS, Rootman I, Bayley D. International school health network: an informal network for advocacy and knowledge exchange. Promot Educ. 2005;12(3–4):173–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.McFarlane J, Wiist W. Preventing abuse to pregnant women: implementation of a “mentor mother” advocacy model. J Community Health Nurs. 1997;14(4):237–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.McPherson ME, Mirkin R, Heatherley PN, Homer CJ. Educating health care professionals in advocacy for childhood obesity prevention in their communities: integrating public health and primary care in the be our voice project. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(8):e37–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Midik O, Coskun O. Medical students’ conceptualisation of health advocacy in an interactive programme. Interact Learn Environ. 2020;28(6):729–43. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Miller KK, Rule ARL, Bensman R, Butteris S, Houser L, Kaeppler C, et al. The immigrant partnership and advocacy curricular kit: a comprehensive train-the-trainer curriculum in immigrant and refugee health. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022;106(4):1013–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Millstein RA, Woodruff SI, Linton LS, Edwards CC, Sallis JF. Development of measures to evaluate youth advocacy for obesity prevention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Minkler M, Griffin J, Wakimoto P. Seizing the moment: policy advocacy to end mass incarceration in the time of COVID-19. Health Educ Behav. 2020;47(4):514–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Miranda DE, García-Ramírez M, Albar-Marín MJ. Building meaningful community advocacy for ethnic-based health equity: the RoAd4Health experience. Am J Comm Psychol. 2020;66(3–4):347–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Moledina A, Ruller S, Halman S, Ying Y. Assessing resident experience of a new experiential learning health advocacy curriculum: a mixed methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Morelli PR, Crawford S, Tanios V, Chelko S, Nowakowski A. A novel disability advocacy and awareness program for training future healthcare professionals on care for patients with disabilities. Cureus [Internet]. 2023 Jan 17 [cited 2025 Sep 13]. https://www.cureus.com/articles/112826-a-novel-disability-advocacy-and-awareness-program-for-training-future-healthcare-professionals-on-care-for-patients-with-disabilities. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 128.Morris H, Hagen L, Hyshka E, Francescutti LH. Empowering students and influencing policy change through experiential public health advocacy education. J Nurs Educ. 2019;58(12):698–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Nedjat-Haiem FR, Carrion IV, Cribbs K, Lorenz K. Advocacy at the end of life: meeting the needs of vulnerable Latino patients. Soc Work Health Care. 2013;52(6):558–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Noh JE. The fight for global health justice: the advocacy of international humanitarian and development NGOs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Voluntas. 2024;35(4):661–75. [Google Scholar]
- 131.Newbigging K, Ridley J. Epistemic struggles: the role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health. Soc Sci Med. 2018;219:36–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Pak-Gorstein S, Batra M, Johnston B, Grow HM, Grant A, Shugerman R, et al. Training pediatricians to address health disparities: an Innovative residency track combining global health with community pediatrics and advocacy. Acad Med. 2018;93(9):1315–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Payne J, Williams S, Maxwell D, Pariente MT, Olivares RA, Janssen Ten Haaf M, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia patient support groups and advocacy: a multinational perspective. Atherosclerosis. 2018;277:377–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Pickover AM, Allbaugh LJ, Sun S, Casimir MT, Graves CC, Wood KA, et al. Ecological framework for social justice advocacy by behavioral health professionals in public healthcare. Psychol Serv. 2020;17(S1):5–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Pierce H, Stafford J, Daube M. Developing an alternative alcohol advertising complaint review system: lessons from a world-first public health advocacy initiative. Public Health Res Pract. 2017;27(3). http://www.phrp.com.au/?p=36694. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 136.Potter K, Beal-Stahl J. A pharmacist’s role in increasing access to menstrual products: an education and advocacy approach. Front Reprod Health. 2024;6:1364698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Puschel K, Thompson B, Rioseco A, Leon A, Goic C, Fuentes I, et al. Cancer advocacy in residency education: from principles to competencies. J Cancer Policy. 2024;40:100470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Ramirez AG, Velez LF, Chalela P, Grussendorf J, McAlister AL. Tobacco control policy advocacy attitudes and self-efficacy among ethnically diverse high school students. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33(4):502–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Raskob K, Ramanan RA, Lezak M, Negrete JE, Binder E, Addington-White J, et al. Advocating with community: a community-engaged advocacy curriculum for internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med. 2025;40(1):113–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Reams RR, Odedina FT, Pressey S. Advocacy resource: engaging the media and promoting your cancer program in Africa. Infect Agents Cancer. 2013;8(S1):S5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Reed FM, Fitzgerald L, Bish MR. A practice model for rural district nursing success in end-of-life advocacy care. Scand Caring Sci. 2018;32(2):746–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Ridley J, Newbigging K, Street C. Mental health advocacy outcomes from service user perspectives. MHRJ. 2018;23(4):280–92. [Google Scholar]
- 143.Rivera L, Starry B, Gangi C, Lube LM, Cedergren A, Whitney E, et al. From classroom to capitol: building advocacy capacity through state-level advocacy experiences. Health Promot Pract. 2016;17(6):771–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Romero D, Kwan A, Chavkin W. Application of empirical research findings in public health advocacy: focus on maternal, child, and reproductive health. J Soc Issues. 2013;69(4):633–44. [Google Scholar]
- 145.Roy N, Khajanchi M, Alty IG, Hamzah R, Aroke A, Banerjee N, et al. Consensus recommendations for acute trauma care & outcomes in LMICs from the transdisciplinary research, advocacy & implementation network for trauma in India. IJMR. 2024;159:274–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Rudolf MCJ, Bundle A, Damman A, Garner M, Kaur V, Khan M, et al. Exploring the scope for advocacy by paediatricians. Arch Dis Child. 1999;81:515–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Schorn MN. Emergency contraception for sexual assault victims: an advocacy coalition framework. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2005;6(4):343–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Selig WKD, Jenkins KL, Reynolds SL, Benson D, Daven M. Examining advocacy and comprehensive cancer control. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16(S1):61–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Servaes J, Malikhao P. Advocacy strategies for health communication. Public Relat Rev. 2010;36(1):42–49. [Google Scholar]
- 150.Shah S, Lou L. The entwined circles of quality improvement & advocacy. Semin Perinatol. 2024;48(3):151901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Shankar S, Phinney R, Krapek A, Surapaneni VL. Building a community-centered public health advocacy training program for medical students. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2022;28(4):E692–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Sharp RR, Yarborough M, Walsh JW, Ethical T. Legal, social Issues working group of the alpha-1 foundation. Responsible patient advocacy: perspectives from the alpha-1 foundation. Am J Med Genet Pt A. 2008;146A(22):2845–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Shilton T. Advocacy for physical activity-from to influence. Promot Educ. 2006;13(2):118–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Shilton T, Milton K. Achieving advocacy success-the international society for physical activity and health’s long-term strategy to advance physical activity as a priority in global health policy. J Phys Activity Health. 2024;21(12):1446–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Shneyderman Y. Health promotion and education ethics in client and patient advocacy. Ethics for health promotion and health Education [Internet]. Elsevier. 2024 [cited 2025 Sep 13]. p. 101–11. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780323952293000016.
- 156.Smith EN, Artunduaga M, Kotsenas AL. Everyday advocacy. Clin Imag. 2023;101:66–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Soklaridis S, Bernard C, Ferguson G, Andermann L, Fefergrad M, Fung K, et al. Understanding health advocacy in family medicine and psychiatry curricula and practice: a qualitative study. Laws, MB, editor. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(5):e0197590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Stein S, Bogard E, Boice N, Fernandez V, Field T, Gilstrap A, et al. Principles for interactions with biopharmaceutical companies: the development of guidelines for patient advocacy organizations in the field of rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Steinman LE, Bradford V, Quinn E, Otten JJ, McNamara J, Fisher K, et al. Examining the Washington state breastfeeding-friendly policy development process using the advocacy coalition framework. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(3):659–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Story CR, Members of the Southern Harm Reduction Coalition, Kao WK, Currin J, Brown C, Charles V. Evaluation of the southern harm reduction coalition for HIV prevention: advocacy accomplishments. Health Promot Pract. 2018;19(5):695–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Talmon G, Wolf A, Molani M, Martin K, Waibel E, Jacobs J, et al. The advocacy journal club. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020;153(2):175–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Thornton J, Edwards R, Harrison RA, Elton P, Astbury N, Kelly SP. ‘Smoke gets in your eyes’: a research-informed professional education and advocacy programme. J Public Health. 2007;29(2):142–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Tsatali M, Gaspar De Almeida Santos A, Makri M, Santokhie R, Boccaletti L, Caciula I, et al. Peer support workers as an innovative force in advocacy in dementia care: a transnational project delivered in Norway, Greece, Italy, and Romania. JMDH. 2024;17:3155–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Twis MK, Cimino A, Files M. Does individual advocacy work?: a research and evaluation protocol for a youth anti-sex trafficking program. CrimRxiv [Internet]. 2022 Jul 9 [cited 2025 Sep 13]. https://www.crimrxiv.com/pub/3zyfqkqa. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 165.Uzochukwu B, Onyedinma C, Okeke C, Onwujekwe O, Manzano A, Ebenso B, et al. What makes advocacy work? Stakeholders’ voices and insights from prioritisation of maternal and child health programme in Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20(1):884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Vahdat S, Hamzehgardeshi L, Hamzehgardeshi Z, Hessam S. Psychometric properties of the patient self-advocacy scale: the Persian version. Nurs Open. 40(4). [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 167.Van Oort B, Van‘T Riet H, Parejo Pagador A, Lescrauwaet Noboa R, Aantjes C. Understanding the what, how, and why in advocacy: assessing the applicability of participatory process evaluation methodology in an advocacy context. Evaluation. 2023;29(4):509–27. [Google Scholar]
- 168.Vance MC, Kennedy KG. Developing an advocacy curriculum: lessons learned from a national survey of psychiatric residency programs. Acad Psychiatry. 2020;44(3):283–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Vervoort D, Zheleva B, Jenkins KJ, Dearani JA. Children at the heart of global cardiac surgery: an advocacy stakeholder analysis. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2021;12(1):48–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Walker SJ, Shrestha LB, Lloyd AR, Dawson O, Sheehan Y, Sheehan J, et al. Barriers and advocacy needs for hepatitis C services in prisons: informing the prisons hepatitis C advocacy toolkit. Int J Drug Policy. 2024;126:104386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Warren N, Markovic M, Manderson L. Typologies of rural lay-health advocacy among rural women in Australia. Women Health. 2006;43(4):27–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Waterston T. Advocacy for children. Curr Paediatr. 2002;12:586–91. [Google Scholar]
- 173.Whittaker A. Abortion law reform advocacy in Thailand. Development. 2003;46(2):72–79. [Google Scholar]
- 174.Williams JTB, Robinson K, Abbott E, Rojop N, Shiffman M, Rice JD, et al. Community perceptions of vaccine advocacy for children under five in rural Guatemala. Adetokunboh, OO, editor. PLoS Glob Public Health. 2023;3(5):e0000728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Yang T, Abdullah AS, Rockett IRH, Li M, Zhou Y, Ma J, et al. Assessment of tobacco control advocacy behavioural capacity among students at schools of public health in China. Tob Control. 2011;20(1):20–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Yu Z, Moustafa D, Kwak R, O’Connor DM, Cavanaugh-Hussey MW, Huang JT, et al. Engaging in advocacy during medical training: assessing the impact of a virtual COVID-19-focused state advocacy day. Postgrad Med J. 2022;98(1159):365–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.van de Goor I, Hämäläinen RM, Syed A, Juel Lau C, Sandu P, Spitters H, et al. Determinants of evidence use in public health policy making: results from a study across six EU countries. Health Policy. 2017;121(3):273–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Baum F, Townsend B, Fisher M, Browne-Yung K, Freeman T, Ziersch A, et al. Creating political will for action on health equity: practical lessons for public health policy actors. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(7):947–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.McQueen DV. Strengthening the evidence base for health promotion. Health Promot Int. 2001;16(3):261–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.de Leeuw E, Yashadhana A, Hitch D. Long COVID: sustained and multiplied disadvantage. Med J Aust. 2022;216(5):222–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Monaci M, Romão ME, Bigi S, Credi B, Korenjak M, Barello S. “About the patient, not for the patient”: a qualitative study on medical reports in hepatology. Patient Educ Couns. 2026;142:109363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Naeve K, Fischer-Mackey J, Puri J, Bhatia R, Yegbemey RN. Evaluating advocacy: an exploration of evidence and tools to understand what works and why [Internet]. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie). 2017. https://www.3ieimpact.org/sites/default/files/2019-01/wp29-advocacy.pdf.
- 183.Monaci M, Romão ME, Bigi S, Barello S. After-visit and discharge summaries: a scoping review of stakeholder perspectives and experiences. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026;26(1):18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Musolino C, Freeman T, Flavel J, Baum F. Non-government advocacy for health equity: evidence from Australia. Health Promot Int. 2024;39(6):daae148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files. The data extraction table and related materials are available from the corresponding author only upon reasonable request.


